Section 2 Core Area 2.1 Downtown Area / Station Area. Introduction DOWNTOWN AREA

Similar documents
Figure Example of out door dining in the public right-of-way.

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

THE CIVIC DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

A P P E N D I X B - O P P O R T U N I T Y S I T E S

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

A Vibrant Downtown. Chapter 5 Cary Public Art Opportunities 31

DRAFT Civic Center Station Area Plan. Executive Summary

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

CHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1

Derry Green Corporate Business Park

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

Comprehensive Plan Advisory Panel Meeting #3

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

The Baileys Planning District portion of the Comprehensive Plan contains site design recommendations for both the Baileys Crossroads Community

appendix and street interface guidelines

Good Design Guidelines for Downtown. Preliminary Findings and Recommendations

Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

GREENING THE BOULEVARD Master Plan Concepts for Venice Boulevard between Lincoln and Sawtelle

FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project

DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITES

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

3.1 Existing Land Use

Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Strategic Growth Area #1 Northampton Boulevard Corridor Area

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

MALL REVITALIZATION CASE STUDIES

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

01 the vision NEW LYNN IS WAITING FOR THE GREAT LEAP FORWARD

The transportation system in a community is an

THE GAS PLANT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN SCENARIO 2. COMMUNITY MEETING August 6, 2018

SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION. introduction

DENVER DESIGN DISTRICT GDP

CONTENTS 6.1 URBAN DESIGN

Mark-up of the effect of the proposed Bronte Village Growth Area OPA No.18 on the text of section 24, Bronte Village, of the Livable Oakville Plan

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

City Council Presentation November 6, 2017

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

Community Design Plan

THAT the attached Terms of Reference for the Thornhill Centre Street Study be approved.

Corridors. Re-vitalize our Corridors and Gateways

Draft Memorandum #1: Goals and Vision for Revitalization

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

6. DOWNTOWN. The Downtown Element focuses on supporting and expanding the vitality and enhancement of Downtown Chico as the City s central core.

YONGE STEELES CORRIDOR SECONDARY PLAN. Young + Wright / IBI Group Architects Dillon Consulting Ltd. GHK International (Canada) Ltd.

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

hermitage town center

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY

2.0 THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE VISION

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

Project Profile BAR HARBOR

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

Chapter 6--Urban Design

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

PIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE. October 19, 2017

Speers Road Corridor Study. Livable Oakville (Official Plan) Council Sub Committee March 20, 2017

PORT OF VANCOUVER WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT. Concept Development Plan City Center Redevelopment Authority April 20, 2017

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

public review draft Key objectives for this chapter are:

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

The Village at Loomis. Long-Envisioned A Wonderful Place to Call Home

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

SECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts

3. Urban Design in the Central Area

EXPO LINE COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS NOVEMBER 27 TH & DECEMBER 3 RD Los Angeles Department of City Planning

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

4- PA - LD - LIVELY DOWNTOWN. LD - Background

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

5 Land Use Element49

Transcription:

Section 2 Core Area Introduction DOWNTOWN AREA Many Thanks Austin, Texas Santa Rosa Downtown Figure 2.1.1 Santa Rosa circa. 1885 Courtesy of Burger and Evans Lithograph The City of Santa Rosa wishes to thank the City of Austin Texas, Design Commission, and particularly Michael Knox, Development Services Process Coordinator, for allowing us to model our Downtown Area after theirs. We appreciate the many hours that these dedicated members and staff spent crafting their document. As a result, the time we spent creating the following Downtown was significantly shortened. Thank you City of Austin! With the establishment of the voter approved 20 year Urban Growth Boundary in 1996, Santa Rosa began to consider ways in which growth could advantageously be encouraged in the Downtown area. Since its beginnings, the Downtown area has been the focus of cultural, commercial, financial and administrative activity for Santa Rosa as well as for the greater Sonoma County region. Santa Rosa s Downtown area presently benefits from a diverse central business district, including County and State administrative services, combining to form a rich downtown nucleus bounded by Santa Rosa Creek, historic residential and commercial districts and interwoven with a pattern of parks. Refer to Section 4.7-Historic Districts, for more detail on the historic districts Cherry Street, Olive Park, Railroad Square, St. Rose and the West End districts within and adjacent to the Downtown Area. With appropriate guidance, the development of uses and activities can be encouraged and made to grow into an energized environment. Similarly, residential densities can be developed and will help to create variety and vitality in Santa Rosa s downtown thereby enhancing safety by reducing unpopulated and unused areas. Additionally, it can result in a walkable, bicycle friendly downtown where our reliance on cars is reduced and where we can live, work and shop in town without getting on a freeway. For those who don t live downtown, a dense core can produce the kind of pressure necessary to support mass transit, further reducing Santa Rosa s reliance on cars. Downtown Area Boundaries: The Downtown Area is bound by College Avenue to the north, Brookwood Avenue/South E Street to the east, Santa Rosa Creek and Sonoma Avenue to the south, and the Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) Road tracks on the west. 2.1.1

Introduction Section 2 Core Area STATION AREA The Downtown Station Area Specific Plan (Specific Plan) was the result of a community based vision for the downtown area of Santa Rosa. Centered on a proposed Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) station site, the Specific Plan defines the framework for future development in the Plan Area. The Specific Plan area (Station Area) encompasses approximately 1,560 parcels, totaling 650 acres, and contains a diverse mix of land uses, development intensities, building heights and circulation patterns. To preserve the character of these diverse neighborhoods while guiding appropriate development, the Station Area is divided into seven distinct sub-areas, which include Courthouse Square, Railroad Square, Railroad Corridor, Park and Gardens, Imwalle Gardens, Residential and Historic Residential sub-areas. Figure 2.1.2 Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Sub-Area Map The citizens of Santa Rosa have a vision of the downtown area that includes bicyclists, pedestrians, transit riders and drivers sharing an attractive network of streets; it includes a mix of housing, shopping, entertainment and jobs in a compact area; and it includes preserving the history, character, and natural benefits of the existing environment while allowing for change. The Specific Plan was a result and an extension of that vision and it provides the regulatory framework for future development of Santa Rosa s downtown area. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to intensify land uses, improve connectivity and circulation, and create safe, attractive walkable environments. Implementation of the Specific Plan will provide opportunities for new development that respect the existing character of the area, improves connections for pedestrian, bicycle and transit riders, and celebrates the natural and historic amenities existing there. A primary objective of the Specific Plan is to increase the number of residents and employees within walking distance of the proposed SMART site through the intensification of land uses in the Station Area. Design related policies from the Specific Plan have been incorporated into this Core Area section of the Design. In addition, minor amendments have been made to the Core Section goals and guidelines, bringing this section into conformance with the Specific Plan. Station Area Boundaries: The Station Area is bound by College Avenue to the north, E Street to the east, Sebastopol Road and Highway 12 to the south, and Dutton Avenue and Imwalle Gardens to the west. 2.1.2

Section 2 Core Area Introduction The overarching goal of these is to encourage diverse uses which mutually reinforce each other and create a twenty-four hour, pedestrian friendly city center that exhibits Superior Design. Santa Rosa is committed to ensuring that all new development and redevelopment is designed in such a way as to revitalize the Downtown Area and Station Area. New buildings should contribute to the richness of our community and interconnect with surrounding structures and breathe life into the city center environment. Here s why I don t like segregation into night things and day things: You don t get the additional things that the workers and the people living there support jointly. Jane Jacobs 1998 Figure 2.1.3 Downtown Market The following apply to all proposed buildings in the Downtown Area and Station Area. In the process of developing these guidelines, the Community Development staff and the Design Review Board consulted numerous city documents and other published literature. Many of the city documents involved extensive public input and many public workshops. The most useful and heavily referenced documents follow: 2.1.3

Introduction Section 2 Core Area Figure 2.1.4 Map of the Downtown Area and Station Area 2.1.4

Section 2 Core Area Introduction Supporting Documents Documents from Santa Rosa: R/UDAT and R/UDAT Follow-up, Santa Rosa, 1998 Downtown Linkages,Santa Rosa, CA Courthouse Square Reunification Study, April 2004 Santa Rosa 2020: General Plan, June 18, 2002 Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, October 9, 2007 Credits Others: Downtown Austin Design, Austin, TX May 2000 Commercial Design, Burlingame, CA - 2001 Our Vision of Downtown San Rafael and Our Implementation Strategy - San Rafael Downtown Community Plan, San Rafael, CA - 1993 Locust Street Extension, Walnut Creek, CA -August 1999 East Mt. Diablo Boulevard Specific Plan, Walnut Creek, CA -August 1996 Ralf Konietzko, Bill Mastick and Fred Flynn, City of Santa Rosa Design Review Board Scott Bartley and Shaun Faber, City of Santa Rosa Planning Commission Paul Eelkema and Stan Henrikson, City of Santa Rosa Cultural Heritage Board Kevin Kellogg and Associates, Architecture and Urban Design Maureen Rich, City of Santa Rosa Department of Community Development 2.1.5

Introduction Section 2 Core Area This page intentionally left blank. 2.1.6

Section 2 Core Area Density Goal 2.1.1 Encourage dense development in the downtown area and station area, redirecting the focus of current growth away from the periphery and concentrating uses in an area with existing infrastructure and services. Figure 2.1.5 A. Allow buildings up to 10 stories within the downtown consistent with the Zoning Map of the City of Santa Rosa. 2.1.7

Mixed Use Goal 2.1.2 Section 2 Core Area Encourage buildings that accommodate mixed uses in the downtown to promote synergy between uses and pedestrian activity that extends beyond the typical 9 to 5 workday and decrease the need for commuting. Figure 2.1.6 Example of housing situated over a commercial use. A. Provide a variety of uses within proposed developments, including residential land uses. Low occupancy uses such as warehouses, storage and parking should not be counted as contributing to mixed-use development. 2.1.8

Section 2 Core Area Buffering Goal 2.1.3 Consider existing residential neighborhoods when designing and planning adjacent commercial development. Figure 2.1.7 Residential uses in an urban context. A. Projects should be planned to minimize increased use of neighborhood streets. Where possible, parking, loading and other vehicular access should occur at mid-block or alley. B. Commercial property with frontage on a neighborhood street should limit public access from that street, and limit business associated parking on that street, so as to avoid significant alterations of the residential character and scale of the existing street. 2.1.9

Art Section 2 Core Area Goal 2.1.4 Encourage the inclusion of civic art to help define public spaces, provide detail and include the rich expressions of our Santa Rosa heritage. Figure 2.1.8 Kinetic artwork by Ned Kahn. A. Encourage developers of new projects to incorporate artists into the design team from the inception of planning in order to integrate works of art into their projects. B. Civic art should: Be incorporated into public infrastructure projects such as bridges, transit systems, highways and roadways; Express local history and identity through functional and ornamental design elements and works of civic art; Mark significant intersections; Create a system of Historical/Cultural/Information points that could mark unique places in the urban context (plaques, walking maps, etc.). 2.1.10

Section 2 Core Area Historic Compatibility Goal 2.1.5 Honor the authenticity and maintain the value of old buildings by directing additions, renovations and new construction to reflect the era in which they are constructed. Figure 2.1.9 New residential that respects the integrity of existing residential. A. Additions, renovations and new buildings should be designed in such a way that they don t appear to have built significantly earlier than they were. This does not preclude the use of materials, scale or massing found in older buildings. B. Buildings date the historical development of the City. It is important that any mimicry of past architectural styles not be exercised in such a way that the historical records become confused. 2.1.11

Adjacency and Context Goal 2.1.6 Section 2 Core Area Encourage appropriate interfaces between old and new structures, thoughtfully considering scale, building articulation and mass. Figure 2.1.10 Demonstrates the compatibility of existing and new vertical and horizontal elements. A. Development in the Downtown should respond to adjacent historically zoned buildings and avoid creating awkward or incompatible design solutions. B. Compatible design need not be created through historic replication, but should reflect a consideration of the materials, scale and massing of the adjacent historic buildings. 2.1.12

Section 2 Core Area Rooftops Goal 2.1.7 Enhance the experience of elevated views through the protection of important views of the surrounding hillsides and screening of undesirable views. Figure 2.1.11 Rooftop view devoid of excessive mechanical equipment. A. Roofs should be designed and constructed in such a way that they acknowledge their visibility from other buildings in the downtown and from the street. Mechanical equipment should be screened when visible from the street or from potential or existing buildings nearby. B. Unused equipment should be removed from view. Screen rooftop equipment from visibility. The point of view for determining visibility shall be 5 feet above grade at a distance of 200 feet. When the roof top is visible from adjacent buildings, screen equipment to the height of the equipment, at a minimum. Screening material should be compatible with the building architecture. C. Integrate attached structure and equipment such as solar collector panels, antennas, satellite dishes, and so on, into the project architecture or screen from view. 2.1.13

On-Site Parking Goal 2.1.8 Control on-site surface parking. Section 2 Core Area 20 Example: Side Parking Figure 2.1.12 Parking location diagrams. Example: Station Area Streets Combining District Parking A. When on site parking is required, locate it to the rear or side of the site. B. Do not place on-site parking in front of the building. C. Locate building entrance at street sidewalk and not adjacent to parking lot. D. Parking lots are not as interesting to pedestrians as buildings and store fronts. E. If parking is located behind the sidewalk, screen vehicles with low walls and/or landscaping. (See Figure 4.2.8 in Section 4.2) F. Provide on-street parking whenever possible. G. Refer to Section 4.2 (Off Street Parking), for additional parking guidelines. H. For properties that are zoned with the Station Area Street Combining District, ground floor parking is not permitted within 20 feet of the street frontage or back of sidewalk, whichever is greater. 2.1.14

Section 2 Core Area Courthouse Square Goal 2.1.9 Treat Courthouse Square with special consideration. Figure 2.1.13 Pedestrian and vehicular enhancements are critical to the success of a reunified Courthouse Square. A. Development facing the public square should receive special architectural consideration. B. Buildings facing the public square should offer fairly consistent building heights and make efforts to establish the civic significance through unique architectural treatment. C. Primary building entrances should face the public square. D. Loading docks, utilities, and service areas should not face the public square unless otherwise required to be on the public square side of the building. E. Activate the ground floor of surrounding Courthouse Square with pedestrian scaled amenities and outdoor dining areas. 2.1.15

Gateways and Terminated Vistas Section 2 Core Area Goal 2.1.10 Provide special treatment to gateway sites and terminated vistas. Figure 2.1.14 Sites in need of special consideration. A. Projects on visually prominent sites should clearly respond to the street and to the adjacent architecture. B. Projects located on gateway sites should incorporate pedestrian amenities such as plazas or benches. C. If the gateway site is located on a corner lot, the project should have a clear relationship with the projects on the opposite corners so that each building supports perception as a pair of buildings. D. Projects on gateway sites should not be seen as opportunities for advertising. Buildings should not be designed as billboards for their particular tenants. E. Signage on gateway sites should incorporate more subdued signage since the building already has a distinct advantage over other buildings in the area. 2.1.16

Section 2 Core Area Fourth Street and Mendocino Avenue Goal 2.1.11 Protect the intimate quality of Mendocino Avenue (between Seventh Street and Transit Mall) and Fourth Street (between B and E Streets). Figure 2.1.15 Map illustrating Mendocino Avenue and 4 th Street area. A. Buildings should reflect a strong sense of human scale within the pedestrian realm. B. The intimate pedestrian-oriented character along Fourth and Mendocino (as illustrated) should be retained in the design of the ground floor, reflecting small scale, development at the street level. C. Architectural step backs above the third floor are encouraged along the street frontage. Consideration should be given to surrounding buildings and the step backs provided on those buildings. A cookie-cutter design, with numerous buildings along one frontage stepping back at exactly the same point should be avoided. 2.1.17

Station Area Sub-Areas Goal 2.1.12 Section 2 Core Area Preserve the distinct character of each Sub-Area within the Station Area by designing new development with the unique characteristics and vision for the seven diverse neighborhoods. Figure 2.1.16 Photographs illustrating four of the seven Station Area Sub-Areas. A. The Courthouse Square Sub-Area is the City s urban center and is envisioned to be a vibrant mixed use area with new housing added to the existing office and retail uses. B. The Railroad Square Sub-Area is the historic transportation center of Santa Rosa and is envisioned to be a mixed use area with residential, hotel, office and retail uses. C. The Railroad Corridor Sub-Area is the area historically influenced by commercial railway operations, but is envisioned to be a diverse mix of multi-family housing, live-work housing and mixed use residential with neighborhood serving retail. D. The Park and Gardens Sub-Area is currently characterized as a commercial strip, but is envisioned to be a mixed use area with housing and retail uses throughout and where new development provides a shared identity for the Julliard Park and Burbank Garden neighborhoods. E. The Imwalle Gardens Sub-Area, once farmed by the Imwalle family, is envisioned to be a residential community with direct pedestrian and bicycle access to the downtown rail station via the Prince Memorial Greenway. F. The Residential and Historic Residential Sub-Areas include eight distinct residential neighborhoods envisioned to maintain and enhance their existing residential characters. 2.1.18