FREEWAY MAINLINE FAIR SHARE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR

Similar documents
4.1 Build Alternative 1 Construction Phasing

Community Meeting US 101/Peninsula Avenue Interchange Project JUNE 25, 2015

4.11 TRAFFIC Existing Conditions Existing Project Site. Existing Street System

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION

2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED. 2.1 Purpose. 2.2 Need Traffic Congestion in and around Downtown Derry

Section 4.11 Traffic and Transportation 4.11 TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT UPDATE BON AIR ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE WATER QUALITY FACILITIES

SR-2 Freeway Terminus Improvement Project

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

Division of Land / Environmental Review. Volume I FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WEST LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY PLAN AREA

Welcome. Northern Segment of Hwy 100 I-90 to South of Madison Street Meeting Goals:

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?

Transportation Improvements

MEMORANDUM. California State University Channel Islands Evacuation Planning Analysis

NORTH, NORTH REDWOOD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY

Chapter Three. Recommendations

Creative Engineering Group Inc, (Creative) Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Professionals

Alaskan Way, Promenade, and Overlook Walk Final EIS Appendix D - Supplemental Draft EIS Comments and Responses October 2016.

FANSHAWE PARK ROAD/RICHMOND STREET INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS. PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE 2 June 16, 2016

SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY MIMP Condition Status Matrix: July 1, 2015 June 30, 2016

Response: The public school use, including the SWM facility, is within the R-1 District.

I-95 Girard Avenue Interchange Near Neighbors Meeting. Project Status

A raised and landscaped median will be constructed in South College Avenue between Trilby Road and Skyway Drive.

Mavis Road Class Environmental Assessment

Whitehurst Freeway Deconstruction Feasibility Study

Moving The Metro. A special construction update for the metro Omaha area.

4.0 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

6 November 10, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: ZION TEMPLE MINISTRIES COGIC

Puget Sound Gateway Program Team. Phase 1, SR 509 Completion Project NEPA Re-evaluation

North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

Table of Contents. Executive Summary...S-1

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

Attachment No. 8. SUMMARY OF IVY STATION INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (IS/MND) COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSES February 2016

Commerce Station (P06-018) Mitigation Monitoring Program

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING

Debra Larson and Director Malcolm Dougherty

RESOLUTION NO. PC

Cotton Belt Corridor. Area Focus Group (AFG) Richardson/Plano August 24, John Hoppie, Capital Planning

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE SCH NUMBER:

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS. Riverfront Boulevard Design From Continental Avenue to Cadiz Street

Boster, Kobayashi & Associates 59 Rickenbacker Circle Office: (925) P.O. Box 2049 Fax: (925) Livermore, CA

ACCESS MANAGEMENT REPORT U.S S.H. 1 TO S.H. 14 S.H U.S. 287 TO I-25

Kurt G. Larson, PE, PTOE

Chesterfield County Project Update

THE NE QUADRANT LAND USE PLAN

NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

Open House Public Involvement Meeting Howland High School Cafeteria, 200 Shaffer Drive NE, Warren, Ohio. Informational Handout

Municipality of Anchorage. Community Council Survey Capital Projects Needs Ranking Survey (ALPHABETICAL) Airport Heights

Citizen Concerns I-16/I-75 Interchange Design

Preliminary Construction & Traffic Planning Intro to Shop Local/Shop Eglinton Initiative. June 27, 2012

Jordan Harrison, Planner III, San Francisco Recreation and Park Department

DOWNTOWN REDMOND LINK EXTENSION SEPA Addendum to the East Link Project Final Environmental Impact Statement

4GROWTH MANAGEMENT 4.1 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 4-1

APPENDIX D TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FACTORS

4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY

5 Eireann Quay Site Plan Control Application

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Population and Demographics Alternatives Development Design Criteria Stormwater Management Guidelines Alternative 1: No Build

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

Route 7/15 Norwalk. Route 7/15 Norwalk Project Project Advisory Committee Meeting #5. Wednesday, November 14 th, Norwalk City Hall

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

FY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Transportation Authorities Project Descriptions

Project Status. Construction is underway for Phase 3. Overall Project Area and Schedule. Schedule of Current Construction Phases.

2014 PSPE Philadelphia Chapter Outstanding Engineering Achievement Award Nomination

SPECIFIC DESIGN PLAN

CHAPTER 10-D GREATER MONTEREY PENINSULA AREA PLAN

Glenn Highway MP DSR. Landscape Narrative

New Stanton Project Update July 3, 2012

7 June 13, 2012 Public Hearing

3.0 Existing Corridor Infrastructure

Findings of Fact and Conclusion

2040 Long Range Transportation Plan

3. Additional driveways may be permitted where determined by the Planning Commission to adequately accommodate traffic or ensure public safety.

Zoning Ordinance Section 1.100

Burton Station Village Community Meeting February 26, 2014

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Green Book 7 th Edition Summary of Changes. Jim Rosenow NCITE Geometric Design Committee August 30, 2018

Appendix G Response to Comments

RIVERSIDE, Newton MA June 9, 2011

3.5 - Land Use and Planning

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY HALL TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA TELEPHONE: (408)

Urban Planning and Land Use

Proposed FY 2004 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Projects

Revised Long Range Transportation Plan

C. WATER. 1. Surface Water Runoff. See Section C.3, Flood Hazard/Mudflow Hazard, page Ground Water

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Coastal Zone Staff Report for Highway 101: Carpinteria to Santa Barbara Local Coastal Program Amendment

Preserving Green Streetscape Character on Hillside Drive

ACTIONS Board of Supervisors Meeting of October 11, 2006

4.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

III. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MARGARITA ROAD. Harveston Community 1,900 homes centered around Harveston Lake DATE STREET ±180,000 CPD. Future French Valley Overpass On/Off Ramp

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Public Information Centre #1

Transcription:

APPENDIX C

FREEWAY MAINLINE FAIR SHARE WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Freeway Segment Direction From To Existing Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project Fair Share % * North Street Riverside Avenue 1,986 3,260 3,478 6% Riverside Avenue Knighton Road 2,061 3,210 3,515 9% I-5 Northbound Knighton Road S. Bonnyview Road 2,111 3,430 3,788 9% S. Bonnyview Road Cypress Avenue 2,313 3,740 3,958 6% Cypress Avenue CA Highway 44 3,134 4,450 4,607 3% CA Highway 44 Cypress Avenue 2,739 4,430 4,586 3% Cypress Avenue S. Bonnyview Road 2,539 4,230 4,447 5% I-5 Southbound S. Bonnyview Road Knighton Road 2,503 4,350 4,707 8% Knighton Road Riverside Avenue 2,406 4,410 4,715 6% Riverside Avenue North Street 2,388 4,650 4,868 4% * Fair Share Calculation for these freeway mainline segments are based on a revised formula (Project Traffic/Cumulative Plus Project Traffic) to account for existing unacceptable Level of Service at each location that the proposed project is not responsible for. Source: Fehr & Peers, 2010 / Quad Knopf, 2010

FREEWAY MAINLINE FAIR SHARE SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK HOUR Freeway Segment Direction From To Existing Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project Fair Share % * North Street Riverside Avenue 1,987 3,260 3,533 8% Riverside Avenue Knighton Road 2,247 3,670 4,052 9% I-5 Northbound Knighton Road S. Bonnyview Road 2,467 3,960 4,405 10% S. Bonnyview Road Cypress Avenue 2,599 4,210 4,481 6% Cypress Avenue CA Highway 44 3,849 5,470 5,665 3% CA Highway 44 Cypress Avenue 2,092 3,380 3,576 5% Cypress Avenue S. Bonnyview Road 1,722 2,940 3,213 8% I-5 Southbound S. Bonnyview Road Knighton Road 1,592 2,710 3,158 14% Knighton Road Riverside Avenue 1,448 2,520 2,899 13% Riverside Avenue North Street 1,348 2,360 2,630 10% * Fair Share Calculation for these freeway mainline segments are based on a revised formula (Project Traffic/Cumulative Plus Project Traffic) to account for existing unacceptable Level of Service at each location that the proposed project is not responsible for. Source: Fehr & Peers, 2010 / Quad Knopf 2010

INTERSECTION FAIR SHARE CALCULATIONS WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Location Existing Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project Fair Share % Cypress Avenue / I-5 SB Ramps 4,039 4,900 5,076 * Cypress Avenue / I-5 NB Ramps 4,154 4,960 5,047 * Bonnyview Road / I-5 SB Ramps 2,651 4,050 4,321 No Mitigation Required Bonnyview Road / I-5 NB Ramps 2,208 3,270 3,419 12%*** Churn Creek Road / Rancho Road 867 1597 1710 * Churn Creek Road / E Niles Lane 317 424 557 Knighton Road / Airport Road 932 1,770 1,980 Knighton Road / Churn Creek Road 666 1,130 1,384 Knighton Rd / Churn Creek Rd / Pacheco Rd 692 1,220 1,552 No Mitigation Required No Mitigation Required No Mitigation Required No Mitigation Required Knighton Road / I-5 NB Ramps 786 1,270 3,615 ** Knighton Road / I-5 SB Ramps 525 710 1703 ** Knighton Road / Riverland Drive 239 320 355 No Mitigation Required Riverside Avenue / I-5 SB Ramps 1,118 1,920 2,085 8%**** Riverside Avenue / I-5 NB Ramps 888 1,770 1,866 5%**** Knighton Rd / Project Access Churn Creek Rd / Project Access (1) Churn Creek Rd / Project Access (2) Churn Creek Rd / Project Access (3) To Be Constructed by Project To Be Constructed by Project To Be Constructed by Project To Be Constructed by Project

Location Existing Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project Fair Share % Churn Creek Rd / Project Access (4) To Be Constructed by Project * Fair Share Calculation to be in accordance with Major Road Impact Fees Program adopted by the Board of Supervisors in June 1991 (Resolution 91-115, A Resolution Establishing Major Road Impact Fees for the South Central Regional Area). ** Fair Share Calculation to be in accordance with Shasta County Ordinance 665 Public Facilities Impact Fees. *** Fair Share Calculation = Project Traffic/Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Existing Traffic **** Fair Share Calculation for these intersections are based on a revised formula (Project Traffic/Cumulative Plus Project Traffic) to account for existing unacceptable Level of Service at each location that the proposed project is not responsible for. Source: Fehr & Peers and Quad Knopf, 2010 ROADWAY SEGMENT FAIR SHARE CALCULATIONS AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME Location From Segment To Existing Cumulative No Project Cumulative Plus Project Fair Share % I-5 Southbound Ramps I-5 Northbound Ramps 5,572 7,500 14,549 * Knighton Road I-5 Northbound Ramps Churn Creek Road 6,705 11,100 25,021 * Churn Creek Road Churn Creek Road Airport Road 3,756 5,600 7,891 Knighton Road E. Niles Lane 2,753 4,800 6,034 E. Niles Lane Rancho Road 4,100 5,000 6,057 Rancho Road I-5 15,296 17,000 17,176 No Mitigation Required No Mitigation Required No Mitigation Required No Mitigation Required * Fair Share Calculation to be in accordance with Shasta County Ordinance 665 Public Facilities Impact Fees. Source: Fehr & Peers and Quad Knopf, 2010

Traffic Model Runs (6/10/2010) Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants