Piles, Trenching, Inverters, Cables, Material Deliveries

Similar documents
Piles, inverters, trenching, cabling, assembly.

Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar) and Ryan Molsee (Enel).

Methods, approaches, and procedures to minimize active agricultural land impacts during pipeline construction, surface restoration, and pipeline

Methods, approaches, and procedures to minimize active agricultural land impacts during pipeline construction, surface restoration, and pipeline

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE

5/15/2013. Basin Area. Vegetation. Rainfall & Runoff. Soil Type. Topics. Factors Influencing Erosion. Factors Influencing Erosion

MARBLE RIVER WIND POWER PROJECT Agricultural Protection Measures

Shelbyville, KY Stormwater Best Management Practices. Section 2 EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN

EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL

Storm Water Basics for Construction Sites Presented by Representatives from the City of Grass Valley and Nevada County

General Information. Site Conditions. 9b 9b. 9a 1b. Best Management Practices Illustration

Wisconsin Contractors Institute Continuing Education

December 13, 2005 Meeting Status of NPDES Post Fire BMPs

Plan of Development Mountain Valley Pipeline Project. APPENDIX M Winter Construction Plan

UPLAND EROSION CONTROL, REVEGETATION, AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

Information for File # JTF

SECTION 6. Routine Maintenance Activity Details

STORMWATER PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT POST-CONSTRUCTION SOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH WORKSHEET

Preventing Storm Water Pollution: What We Can Do

SOP 6: Erosion and Sedimentation Control SOP 6: EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL

PERMANENT SEEDING. Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices. Practice no. 6.11

A. Install all temporary erosion control measures (in accordance with MNDOT General Conditions 2573) prior to site disturbance.

Soil Reclamation and Site Reinstatement

Urban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT

A. Contractor shall provide product data for each type of product indicated.

2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens

Site Formation Excavation - 6' depth square yard $8.00 $0.00 Grading square yard $1.50 $0.00 Hauling off-site - 6' depth square yard $10.00 $0.

Illinois Urban Manual

Information for File # ARC

Protect Stormwater Quality Project and Site Management Training for General Contractors. Presenter Becky Pearson Professional Civil Engineer

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

A. Install all temporary erosion control measures (in accordance with MNDOT General Conditions 2573) prior to site disturbance.

Department of Agriculture. Conservation Service. United States. Natural Resources REVISED 8/26/16


STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION Manheim Borough

IMPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMPS AND FLOOD PREPAREDNESS FOR 2016 EL NIÑO STORMS

Structural Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Drainage Analysis-Newgate/Phelps & Hatchett Hill Road Areas Rev. 0 Erosion & Sediment Control Measures

2018 Annual Landfill Inspection Report

Vegetation Management

The proper use of erosion and sediment controls will allow the following objectives to be met:

Erosion Control for Home Builders in the. City of Jacksonville

Project Applicant Checklist for NPDES Permit Requirements SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING

City of Stoughton Erosion Control Permit Application (effective 2/6/2018)

Feet. Overland. Drainage Area Boundary. To Swale. Swale. To Catch Basin. Culvert Pipe. To Drain Outfall. NRCS Soil Area Boundary

2016 Annual Inspection Report

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

Part IV(a): BMPs for Erosion, Sediment, Velocity Control

Triangle Land Conservancy Conservation Area Monitoring Report Carolina North

Alternative Names: Erosion Control Matting, Erosion Control Netting, Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP)

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

Nevada Contractors Field Guide for Construction Site Best Management Practices (BMPs)

Town of Essex Small Site Erosion Control Guide

Erosion & Sediment Control Plan Application Form & Checklist

Public Works Department 104 W. Magnolia Street, Suite 109 Bellingham, WA (360)

SILT FENCE MACHINE SLICED ERO-1A STEEL FENCE POST (T-POST), MINIMUM 5' LONG, 6' MAXIMUM SPACING.

A DIVISION OF L & M SUPPLY EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS, WATTLES AND LOGS

CITY OF TUMWATER 555 ISRAEL RD. SW, TUMWATER, WA (360) (360) (FAX)

Cedar Niles Future Park Site Wetland #1

Landscape Rebate: Rainwater Harvesting Rain Garden Installer Guidelines

WQ-23 MOUNTAINOUS AND STEEP SLOPE SITES

Caribbean Area PO Box San Juan, PR Page Topics

Low Flow Rates Low Filtration Sandy Soils Medium Flow Rates Medium Filtration Clayey Soils [1] High Flow Rates High Filtration Polluted Soils

The Low Risk Site Handbook

VEGETATED SLOPE STABILIZATION DESCRIPTION APPLICABILITY. Advantages

Revetting and Supporting River Banks 4.7 Bank revetment using low steel sheet piling and coir rolls

Chapter 2 Roof Downspout Controls

Chagrin River Watershed Partners, Inc. Local Regulations. Amy H. Brennan (440)

Triangle Land Conservancy Conservation Area Monitoring Report Carolina North

I N D U S T R I A L Y A R D S

A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF FINDINGS B. EXISTING CONDITIONS. Table 10-1 Adjacent Storm Drains

ARROW BOWEN PIPELINE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN OUTLINE SOIL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Planting Guide for Buffers

Rain Garden Installation Guide

Landfill Closure, Intermediate Cover & Post-Closure Care. Municipal League Meeting

RECOMMENDED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR RESTORATION OF WETLANDS AFTER TEMPORARY IMPACTS

Guidance on Preparation of Construction and Maintenance Costs

5.0 Storm Water Landscape Guidance Introduction

RAIN GARDEN ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD. (feet) CODE 897 DEFINITION

2

Vegetated Filter Strips and Buffers

CHAPTER 4. SPECIAL CONDITION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES

12/7/2007. Christopher B. Burke Engineering West, Ltd Aux Sable Creek Watershed Plan Update 1

MAIN ROADS Western Australia COALFIELDS HIGHWAY PROJECTS ROADSIDE REVEGETATION MANAGEMENT

SECTION SEEDING

Homeowners Guide to Stormwater BMP Maintenance

Buffer Zone (BZ) Stream Protection. The width and plant composition of a buffer zone will determine its effectiveness.

These tools may be useful when constructing the rain garden. Power tools can make the work easier, but are not essential. n Stakes or marking flags

11 Convey Water in Swales

Using the Updated RI Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. The Introductory Workshop for RIDEM/CRMC Staff January 23, 2015

THE OBJECTIVES OF ROUTINE ROAD CUTS AND FILLS

ATTACHMENT 1 WILSON MINE LECROY AREA SEMIPERMANENT DEWATERING SYSTEM

Adaptive Management of Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practices (BMPs) Presenter: Denis Rushton, P. Eng. Date: May 18, 2016

SECTION 900 TURF ESTABLISHMENT

field note Culvert foundation improvement design concepts The challenge of low-cost culvert foundations

BEFORE INSTALLATION BEGINS

Kittson Parkway / Watershed Park Parking Lot

Transcription:

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Albany Date of Inspection 20161012 Start/End Time 7:50 am Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles, Trenching, Inverters, Cables, Material Deliveries Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Mostly cloudy, temperature in the upper 30 s to low 40 s. General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson, and Ryan Molsee (Enel). Site is in good condition. Most compliance items observed last week have not yet been resolved as Minnesota Native Landscapes (MNL) has been working on other sites; compliance work for this site is scheduled. Michels is planning to use a skid-steer to begin dressing up closed trenches and remove any excess subsoil remaining on the topsoil surface. An improper de-watering set up was observed in the southeast corner of the site. The hose was discharging onto a composite mat to prevent scouring but no sediment bag was present. Topsoil was pushed up in unprotected berms on either side of the discharging water to route the water offsite. The water was discharging into vegetation but no other sediment treatment was occurring. The pump was shut down and the site manager was notified. Issues Noted During Inspection: Compliance items noted during the previous inspection on 10/6/2016 remain; compliance work is scheduled with MNL. Water was being pumped and discharged offsite without the use of a sediment bag or other treatment. Unprotected topsoil was used to divert the pumped water offsite. Agricultural Inspection Report Albany 20161012

Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: Use of an adequate filter bag for sediment collection when de-watering; Use of straw wattles or equivalent treatment of water leaving the site; and Use of alternative methods to divert water; if topsoil is the only option, protective covering to prevent topsoil loss is required. Photos: Photo 1: De-watering hose discharging onto composite mat to prevent scouring. Unprotected topsoil berms used to divert water offsite, no further treatment of water prior to leaving site. Agricultural Inspection Report Albany 20161012

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Annandale Date of Inspection 20161012 Start/End Time 3:00 pm Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles and inverters installed, access roads complete, SWPPP updates/maintenance, material delivery, trenching, cabling, assembly Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Partly Cloudy, Low 60s General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Ryan Molsee (Enel), and Jacob Thompson (Barr Engineering). Soil mixing is occurring in trench spoils in some areas where soil horizons are clearly defined; problem areas were pointed out to Nate (Biosar site manager). Appropriate de-watering methods were discussed as trenching has encountered ground water in some locations due to the elevated water table. Various instances of deep rutting caused by lull traffic were discussed. Ruts typically are not resulting in mixing of soil horizons. Erosion control devices in the southwest portion of the site have held up relatively well; Jacob and Paula discussed repairs that were needed to the area. Issues Noted During Inspection: Soil horizon mixing in trench spoils clearly defined horizons. Rutting (not severe at this point) Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: Agricultural Inspection Report Annandale 20161012

Ensure equipment operators understand soil segregation requirements. Limit traffic to the extent possible to designated travel routes. Photos: Photo 1: Soil horizon mixing in trench spoil piles. Agricultural Inspection Report Annandale 20161012

Photos: Photo 2: Trench with clearly defined soil horizons; topsoil not placed a sufficient distance from trench. Photo 2: Trench with ground water present. Agricultural Inspection Report Annandale 20161012

Photos: Photo 4: Minor SWPPP repairs needed at borrow area. Agricultural Inspection Report Annandale 20161012

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Atwater Date of Inspection 20161012 Start/End Time 11:45 am Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles, Inverters, Material Deliveries and Staging, Trenching, Assembly, SCADA house. Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Partly cloudy, temperatures in the low 40s. General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson (Barr) and Ryan Molsee (Enel. Most trenches are excavated properly with good segregation of soil horizons. One location along the eastern portion of the southeast inverter did not have adequate soil segregation. Space in the area was limited and the trench involved a portion of the access road. Spoil piles had evidence of more topsoil material in the bottoms of the piles with subsoil piled on top. Spoils were also falling into adjacent trenches. Topsoil remaining from the SCADA house and junction box excavations can be used to cover areas where sufficient topsoil is lacking due to mixing in spoil piles. An improper de-watering set up was observed on the north side of the main wetland. Only a small filter sock was present at the discharge point; the sock had blown off the end of the hose and cloudy water was present in an area approximately five feet wide and 50 to 60 feet long along the wetland perimeter silt fence. Water entering the wetland was clear. Most of the sediment had settled out of the water on the outside of the wetland silt fence. A second area of de-watering was observed near the southeast inverter. Pumping was complete but evidence of scouring was present. There was no indication that a sediment bag or other appropriate filtration or velocity dissipation measures were used. Issues Noted During Inspection: De-watering of trenches without proper measures taken to prevent erosion and sedimentation. Agricultural Inspection Report Atwater 20161012

Mixing of soil horizons during trenching activities in one location. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: Photos: Review of proper de-watering requirements, and Discussion on mitigation of mixed topsoil. Photo 1: Insufficient filter sock at discharge location. Agricultural Inspection Report Atwater 20161012

Photos: Photo 2: Sediment remaining at water discharge location; sediment will not have a significant impact on topsoil. Photo 3: Second de-watering location; hose imprint and scoured area are visible. Agricultural Inspection Report Atwater 20161012

Photos: Photo 3: Scouring caused by lack of sediment bag and velocity dissipation measures during dewatering. Photo 4: Aggregate material stored on top of access road area to avoid mixing with topsoil. Agricultural Inspection Report Atwater 20161012

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Dodge Center Date of Inspection 20161013 Start/End Time 5:05 pm Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles, inverters, and most panels installed; trenching; cabling; SCADA work. Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Clear to partly cloudy, temperature in the low to mid-50 s General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson (Barr), and Ryan Molsee (Enel). Vacuum trucks were used to suck the water and sediment out of the combiner box trenches. A makeshift pit area was constructed at the top of the site just to the west of the main laydown yard for the trucks to empty into. The area was surrounded by the perimeter silt fences on the south, an unprotected earthen berm on the east, one row of silt fence on the west, and a partial earthen berm on the north (front) side of the dumping area. When we arrived for the inspection, the pit was failing, causing sediment-laden water and muck to pour over and seep under the perimeter controls. Several cubic yards of subsoil material will need to be scraped off of topsoil within and vegetation surrounding the dumping area. A second location was used to dump vacuumed material on the north end of the site near the lower entrance. This location also require sediment to be scraped up off of topsoil. Minnesota Native Landscapes (MNL) has performed maintenance of erosion control devices onsite and upgraded installations in some areas. Issues Noted During Inspection: Dumping of vacuum truck contents has resulted in a substantial amount of sediment placed directly on top of topsoil. Agricultural Inspection Report Dodge Center 20161013

Sediment laden water and muck has breached the perimeter silt fence in multiple locations along the southwestern portion of the site. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: Allow sediment to dry; scrape material off of topsoil and vegetation within and surrounding the pit area. Replace SWPPP devices impacted by the sediment flows. Remove and protect topsoil that was used to create the earthen berms. Photos: Photo 1: Vacuum trucks rinsing out into a containment area. Double row of perimeter silt fence formed the southern boundary of the area. Agricultural Inspection Report Dodge Center 20161013

Photos: Photo 2: Perimeter silt fence was breeched by the muck. Photo 3: West edge of the containment area was damaged, allowing sediment and water to continue flowing downhill to the west. Agricultural Inspection Report Dodge Center 20161013

Photos: Photo 4: Water and sediment traveling beyond the perimeter silt fence. Photo 5: New BMP installation in southwest corner of the site. Agricultural Inspection Report Dodge Center 20161013

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Eastwood Date of Inspection 20161013 Start/End Time 1:30 pm Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles, material delivery, inverters set, trenching, SCADA house work Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Sunny, temperature in the 50 s General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson (Barr), and Ryan Molsee (Enel). Site is in overall good condition. A large amount of sand remains along the central access road and will be used to backfill trenches. The site manager is aware of the need to scrape up the excess sand to prevent excessive amounts of sand being incorporated into the topsoil. No compliance items were noted at this time. Issues Noted During Inspection: None at this time. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: None at this time. Agricultural Inspection Report Eastwood 20161013

Photos: Photo 1: Area with trenching and cabling completed. Photo 3: Remaining sand stockpile. Agricultural Inspection Report Eastwood 20161013

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Hastings Date of Inspection 20161014 Start/End Time 7:45 am Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Assembly, pile driving, pile drilling, material deliveries, inverters Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Clear, temperature in the low 40s. General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson (Barr) and Ryan Molsee (Enel). Canada thistle and other weeds throughout a portion of the site were mowed by the pile driving crew. However, dense patches of flowering and seeding thistle remain in the southwest corner of the site and pose a risk to the neighboring field. Jacob and Paula discussed appropriate methods of control, including cutting and bagging the flowering and seeding plants to avoid spreading seed and mowing of the remaining vegetative plants. Minnesota Native Landscapes has not yet been onsite to repair the damaged silt fence that was observed last week. Issues Noted During Inspection: Noxious weeds (Canada thistle) are still a problem in the southwest corner of the site and are spreading seed. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: Properly dispose of flowering and seeding plants to avoid spreading seed; mow remaining plants. Agricultural Inspection Report Hastings 20161014

Photos: Photo 1: Example of well-established vegetative thistle plants. Agricultural Inspection Report Hastings 20161014

Photos: Photo 2: Canada thistle plants flowering and dispersing seed. Photo 3: Silt fence has been completely flattened; silt still needs to be removed and relocated up the hill. Agricultural Inspection Report Hastings 20161014

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Lake Pulaski Date of Inspection 20161013 Start/End Time 7:40 am Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Grading, piles, access roads Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Mostly cloudy, upper 60s General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson (Barr) and Ryan Molsee (Enel). The site is in nearly the same condition as during last week s site visit. Topsoil stockpile covers have been replaced and fixed more securely. The earthen berm along the northeast corner of the site is complete and topsoil was spread over the berm. It was noted that the dozer that spread the topsoil traveled along the length of the berm, perpendicular to the slope. This action results in the cleats of the dozer tracks leaving shallow imprints that run parallel all along the slope and provide a route for rain runoff to create rills. We discussed alternative methods to finish the berm that would help to secure the soil. A crew was working on the access road, filling the road cut with compacted sand. Crushed granite rock was added to the wheel tracks in soft areas. It is our understanding that additional rock will be laid to finish the road and provide stability. Little further work was done in the western portion of the site due to continued wet conditions. Issues Noted During Inspection: No new compliance items were noted. Corrective Actions: Agricultural Inspection Report Lake Pulaski 20161013

Corrective actions discussed onsite included: None. Photos: Photo 1: Repaired topsoil covering. Agricultural Inspection Report Lake Pulaski 20161013

Photos: Photo 2: Crushed granite added to soft spots in the road. Photo 3: Access road work. Agricultural Inspection Report Lake Pulaski 20161013

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Montrose Date of Inspection 20161012 Start/End Time 5:25 pm Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles, access road and laydown yard complete; trenching and drain tile work. Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Mostly cloudy, temperature in the mid 50 s. General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Jacob Thompson (Barr) and Ryan Molsee (Enel). Blattner personnel were onsite beginning trenching activities in the southern portion of the site. Equipment was removing the topsoil layer only from the southernmost trench. Topsoil removal was excellent. Hodgeman drain tile personnel were onsite installing new tile through the central portion of the site. Soil horizons were appropriately separated and segregated. Site is in good condition. Issues Noted During Inspection: No new compliance items were observed. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: None. Agricultural Inspection Report Montrose 20161012

Photos: Photo 1: Topsoil removed from first trench. Photo 2: Subsoil replaced over newly installed drain tile. Topsoil remains segregated. Agricultural Inspection Report Montrose 20161012

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name Paynesville Date of Inspection 20161012 Start/End Time 10:20 am Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Piles installed, trenching, cabling, inverters, SCADA work, assembly, deliveries. Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Partly sunny, temperature in the upper 30 s to low 40s. General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald, Jacob Thompson (Barr) and Ryan Molsee (Enel). Site was sprayed for noxious weed control on Friday, October 7, 2016. There are multiple places throughout the site where lull tracks are found to be causing ruts. According to Mark (Biosar site manager), it is difficult on this site to restrict access for the lulls due to muddy conditions. None of the rutting was observed to be causing mixing of soil horizons at this time, though additional widespread de-compaction efforts will likely be necessary at this site during restoration. Bio-rolls around the boring site within the wetland on the west portion of the project site were installed incorrectly; MNL will be notified of necessary corrections. Issues Noted During Inspection: Rutting this is not a compliance item at this time but site conditions will continue to be monitored; an increase in severity of ruts may result in non-compliance. SWPPP device installations minor item that will be flagged for correction. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: Agricultural Inspection Report Albany 20161012

Reduce traffic routes, Correct SWPPP installations where necessary. Photos: Photo 1: Increase in redundant travel routes. Agricultural Inspection Report Albany 20161012

Photos: Photo 4: Incorrect SWPPP device installation; no overlapping of ends and the roll does not maintain contact with the ground. Agricultural Inspection Report Albany 20161012

Agricultural Inspection Report General Information Project Name West Waconia Date of Inspection 20161013 Start/End Time 9:45 am Inspector s Name(s) Inspector s Title(s) Describe present phase of construction Shannon Kulseth Agricultural Monitor Grading complete, pile installation nearly complete, trenching, cabling Weather Information Weather at time of this inspection? Overcast, temperature in the mid-50 s. General Inspection Notes: Additional personnel accompanying me on the site inspection today included Paula Fitzgerald (Biosar), Ryan Molsee (Enel) and Jacob Thompson (Barr). Chip (Biosar site manager) noted that composite mats were arriving onsite shortly to be used on soft portions of the access road to reduce rutting. We noted a few areas where residual subsoil from trenching activities may adversely affect vegetation establishment during restoration; Chip stated that additional subsoil cleanup activities will occur when trenching is complete. Trench spoils were mixed in areas that had previously been graded; this has been a common occurrence since the re-grading of topsoil over subsoil increases the difficulty of later separation. An improper de-watering set up was observed on the west side of the wetland in the southern portion of the site. A filter bag was present but was not attached to the discharge hose. The water was flowing directly toward the wetland perimeter silt fence. The water was not being pumped at a high velocity and the water entering the wetland through the silt fence was clear. Chip attached the filter bag while we observed the setup. Canada thistle plants were found to be going to seed in several locations across the site. The large topsoil sediment flow on the northeast side of the wetland needs to be scraped up and either replaced uphill or stored for later use. Equipment is traveling through the area and rutting the sediment. Agricultural Inspection Report West Waconia 20161013

Issues Noted During Inspection: De-watering set up did not have a filter bag attached. This was remedied while we were onsite. Noxious weeds (Canada thistle) are flowering and dispersing seed in various locations across the site. Other items noted were not significant at this time. Corrective Actions: Corrective actions discussed onsite included: In addition to the correction of the immediate problem with the de-watering set up, the subcontractor (Michels) needs to be informed of de-watering requirements as at least three improper set ups were observed during this week s inspections. Properly dispose of thistle plants that are flowering and going to seed; mow vegetative plants to prevent flowering. Photos: Photo 1: Canada thistle is flowering and dispersing seed. Agricultural Inspection Report West Waconia 20161013

Photos: Photo 2: Soil horizons seem to be very difficult for operators to separate once they have been graded. Photo 3: De-watering hose with filter bag unattached. Agricultural Inspection Report West Waconia 20161013

Photos: Photo 4: Topsoil that washed downhill during previous rain events needs to be collected and stockpiled or replaced uphill. Agricultural Inspection Report West Waconia 20161013