Corridor Beautification Partnership

Similar documents
FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

City of Aurora Planning Department DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL DISPENSING STATION. August 3, 1998

ZONING. 300 Attachment 1. City of Oneonta. Design Guidelines ( )

Table of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

At Your Disposal CUP Amendment, Lot 20, Village Service Commercial, at 128 Bastille Dr. (PLN17-208)

Town of White Springs Design Standards

U.S. Highway 377 North Overlay District. 1. General Purpose and Description

A Plan Enhancement Process for the Future of Howard Design Studio 2 May 28-30, The Howard Plan

DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

appendix and street interface guidelines

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

180 ZONING 180. ARTICLE XLII STREETSCAPE ENHANCEMENT OVERLAY ( SEO ) DISTRICT [Added Ord. No. 1086]

3.4 Business & Light Industrial Parks and Buildings

*/ * ELIZABETH AVE AC AC NS O-2 MUDD(O) MUDD(O) COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

1. General Purpose. 3. Uses

BEST PRACTICES FOR PROJECT NOMINATIONS TA Set-Aside Program

Town of Cedarburg Design Guidelines & Standards Commercial / Multi Family / Senior Care /Institutional/ Government Facilities Adopted August 6, 2014

Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board

DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

Roanoke Rapids Streetscape Master Plan. City Council Presentation

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

The Auburn Plan Designing the Future of Auburn February 28, 2005

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

TEMPLE MEDICAL & EDUCATION DISTRICT

Motor City Re-Store Design Guidelines

PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

Prepared by: LCT Design Group, LLC 401 North Franklin Street, Suite 5S Chicago, Illinois 60610

Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Urban Planning and Land Use

On the agenda. Mandan Architectural Review Commission. Mandan Architectural Review Commission. Purpose & Procedures MARC Directive.

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014

CITY OF DAVIS DESIGN REVIEW INFORMATION CHECKLIST

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

ARTICLE RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES

Community Design Plan

Design Guidelines and Development Standards for Southwood Ranch. Prepared February, 2016 by

Community Meeting November 18, 2015

Design Guidelines for Residential Subdivisions

Golden Gate Downtown Center Commercial Overlay District (GGDCCO).

Streetscape Patterns. Design Guidelines, Ridgewood Village Center Historic District, Ridgewood, N.J. page 20

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

d Escoto, M. City of Chicago Streetscape and Urban Design Program, Chicago Department of Transportation. (2003). Streetscape Guidelines.

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

TEAM INPUT SUMMARY. Postcard Image?

COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION

general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

Section 511: 11 th Street Overlay District 1. Intent: 11 th Street is the primary entrance route into the city from the south, providing direct

Design Guidelines: Brownsville Rd Façade Improvement Program

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

Pedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO

Development and Engineering Services

PLANNING AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR BLOCK C OF THE MT. DIABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by Design Review Commission February 4, 2004

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF NORTHVIEW FUNERAL HOME HIGHBURY AVE N, LONDON, ON

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

VICTORIA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

Gas Stations ottawa.ca

Site Development Plan (SDP) Checklist

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT S. Apartments Planned Development PLNSUB Planned Development 247 West 1400 South March 12, 2014

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

Volume 2: Implementation Plan

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

The transportation system in a community is an

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation May 30, 2017

LITTLETON CENTER DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Residential Development

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

urban design Introduction

Planning Board Report: Zoning Amendments (Articles 20 & 21)

DOWNTOWN FACADE GUIDELINES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

The Lincoln Neighborhood Corridor Plan. The LiNC

City of Hermosa Beach Administrative Policy #

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Turf Removal Program / Drought Tolerant landscape Rebate Program

C I T Y O F T O R O N T O L A W R E N C E A V E N U E E A S T S T U D Y. Northwest Corner of Birchmount Road and Lawrence Avenue East

Commercial Development Permit Area

TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF. August, MOUNTLAKE TERRACE TOWN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS August,

*/ * ELIZABETH AVE AC AC NS O-2 MUDD(O) MUDD(O) COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL

Transcription:

Corridor Beautification Partnership December 6, 2016 Lindsey Guindi, Director of Strategic Projects Lindsay Hackett, Staff Planner Stephanie Doland, Staff Planner

Corridor Beautification Partnership FY 2017 Allocated Funding $100,000 New program Similar structure to: Downtown Improvement Program Life Safety Grant Grant Guidelines: Boundaries Character Zones Grant Allocation/Criteria Qualifying Improvements Submittal Requirements Review Board Timeline

Relation to Comprehensive Plan By the late 1960s Texas Avenue had superseded Downtown Bryan as the central business district for the entire region. Such unregulated growth has resulted in a development pattern that exists today. Subsequent to the unregulated growth, age, obsolescence, deferred maintenance has created an unhealthy business environment that in many areas is unsightly. As has been identified during the public engagement process, current conditions along the Texas Avenue corridor is perceived as an obstacle to the future success of the community.

Relation to Comprehensive Plan To address the above issues, the following actions should be considered: Offer matching grants and incentives for exterior maintenance and landscaping of existing buildings not within redevelopment focus areas. Create a theme for the corridor. Develop appearance standards that match the desired theme. Consolidate lots where possible to create larger regional retail and office establishments. Create pedestrian and bicycle linkages to adjacent neighborhoods. To assist in traffic management along Texas Avenue, cross access and shared driveways should be required where possible. All types of retail uses are desired and restaurants are encouraged.

Proposed Character Zones

Corridor Beautification Partnership College Station to Villa Maria Distance: 1.3 miles Approx. 65 parcels Mixture of zoning: primarily retail RNC (North Oakwood) Existing land use retail and office

Proposed Character Zones Villa Maria to Coulter Distance: 1.38 miles Approx. 65 parcels Mixture of zoning: retail primarily commercial Existing land use: retail and commercial

Proposed Character Zones Coulter Dr to SH-21 Distance: 2.15 miles Approx. 125 parcels Mixture of zoning retail commercial south college business downtown civic residential district Existing land use Institutional, office, commercial

Proposed Character Zones SH-21 to SH-6 Distance: 3 miles Approx. 125 parcels Mixture of zoning: retail commercial industrial residential district agriculture Existing land use primarily residential

Boundary Options Option 1 Revolving eligibility Proposed Character Zones College Station to Villa Maria 65+ parcels Villa Maria to Coulter 125+ parcels Coulter to SH-21 65+ parcels SH-21 to SH-6 125+ parcels Option 2 Entire Corridor Open application for all properties in Bryan adjacent to Texas Avenue Option 3 Any combination of options 1 & 2 Change boundaries

Grant Allocation Criteria Amount requested vs. Impact of project (efficiency use of dollars) Increase to ad valorem tax and sales tax Visibility to intersections Visibility from Texas Ave Occupancy of vacant buildings Creation of jobs Improvement to dilapidated buildings Consolidation of properties/ Parcel Size Increased compliance to City of Bryan Code of Ordinances

Grant Allocation Smaller projects Larger quantity of small impact projects Example: sign replacement, parking lot striping Larger projects Fewer quantity of larger impact projects Example: façade renovation, landscaping renovation, driveway closing Must meet economic development goals and objectives, such as: Meet minimum increase in taxable value, or Increase number of jobs High Impact Low Impact

Landscaping/Irrigation Improvements Encouraged: Parking lot screening Local drought-resistant vegetation (xeriscaping: seen to the right) Planters and planter boxes High efficiency irrigation systems (buried or drip systems) Landscaping at base of signage Discouraged: Non drought resistant landscaping Landscaping that blocks vehicular line-of-sight Sprinkler based irrigation By Jeffrey Beall - Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41849718

Building Material/Façade Improvements Encouraged: Finished masonry or equivalent Decorative concrete, native stone, brick/brick veneer Cement Fiberboard (hardiplank) Stucco Glass (particularly at the pedestrian level) Window security film Discouraged: Vinyl, wood fiber hardboard, oriented strand board, plastic, or fiberglass siding EIFS (synthetic stucco) Metal sidings of any kind (excluding roofs, awnings, and canopies) Unfinished cinderblock Un-textured concrete finishes Glass mirrored at more than 20%

Parking/Circulation/Access Improvements Encouraged: Compliant parking lot standards and access Improved internal circulation New parking lot striping Wayfinding signage Landscaping in end islands ADA Improvements Increase to required number of ADA spaces Crosswalks Ramps Discouraged: Spot filling pot holes instead of repaving entire parking area Unseen improvements to back of property Unnecessary/oversized curb cuts Unimproved surfaces Crushed granite Limestone Gravel http://www.all-ritesealcoating.com/portfolio_category/parking-lotstriping/#prettyphoto[gallery678]/0/

Signage Improvements Encouraged: Compliance with Sign Ordinance Removal of abandoned signs Replacement of outdated signs Recessed lighting Externally illuminated signage and lettering Internally illuminated signs with opaque field and translucent letters Landscaping around freestanding signs Discouraged/Prohibited: Off premises signs Temporary signs Snipe signs Rooftop signs Flashing, blinking, revolving, digital, video or traveling lighted signage Internally illuminated signs External reflectors Window signs

Existing Land Uses Encouraged: Parking at rear of structure Landscaping Along Texas Avenue Screening parking, dumpsters Storage area limited to 10% of total lot (or at rear of building) Vehicles undergoing repair to be stored indoors Increased compliance with development standards Discouraged: Outside storage Outside display Display/parking vehicles in the setbacks View of damaged vehicles from Texas Ave ROW Temporary/portable structures

Submittal Requirements A completed application form Comprehensive photos of existing site conditions A narrative of the project describing the work to be completed Drawings/plans detailing the proposed improvements (PDF format) Two (2) itemized cost estimates from two independent sources Current tax certificate showing no delinquent taxes for the property Owner s certification and proof of ownership

Review Board Application Review Board Economic Development Transportation Engineering Chief Building Official Planning

Timeline December 6, 2016 Council Workshop Presentation January 10, 2017 CAF to Council February 6, 2017 Open application (Monday) March 17, 2017 Close application (Friday) April 25, 2017 Staff makes recommendations to Council End April 2017 Notifications mailed out

Summary Grant Guidelines Boundary Options Character Zones Entire Corridor Hybrid Version Grant Allocation/Criteria Landscaping & Irrigation Building Materials & Façade Parking, Circulation & Access Signage Improvements Existing Land Uses Qualifying Improvements Smaller Projects Larger Projects Submittal Requirements Review Process Staff Review Board Council Approval Timeline Application Deadline

Discussion and Questions