STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

Similar documents
Public Hearing. Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 14, open house at 4 p.m., formal presentation at 5 p.m.

2.1.8 Cultural Resources Regulatory Setting. Affected Environment, Environmental

The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass

Open House Public Involvement Meeting Howland High School Cafeteria, 200 Shaffer Drive NE, Warren, Ohio. Informational Handout

ITS Concept Development Activity Descriptions

SECTION 4(f) DE MINIMIS DOCUMENTATION

PROJECT STATEMENT LOCATION/DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING. 19 th AVENUE NORTH EXTENSION PROJECT FROM SPRINGDALE DRIVE TO NORTH 2 ND STREET/U.S.

WELCOME! 8 8:30 6: TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Open House. Presentation & Q&A

TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Appendix E Memorandum of Agreement between FHWA and the SHPO

DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION INTERSTATE 73 FEIS: I-95 to I-73/I-74 in North Carolina

North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch

CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION DETERMINATION I 435/I 35/K 10 INTERCHANGE (JOHNSON COUNTY GATEWAY)

PURPOSE: The purpose is to provide commercial facilities in the Vancouver and Clark County vicinity.

FDOT D4 Complete Streets

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

2.4 FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives and Policies

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

PD&E STUDY SR 9/I-95 FROM SOUTH OF SR 870/COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD TO NORTH OF CYPRESS CREEK ROAD FM # ETDM 14222

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

7th Avenue Creek Master Plan Development Project. City of St. Charles, IL. IAFSM CONFERENCE March 14, 2018 MARKET

Overview of Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission s (SPC) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)

Draft Environmental Assessment Appendix A. SHPO Correspondence, January 19, 2017

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

Page. I. Introduction 1. II. Project Purpose and Need 2. IV. Description of Section 4(f) Property 2. V. Impacts to Section 4(f) property 3

Response: The public school use, including the SWM facility, is within the R-1 District.

PennDOT. single spann lanes and 3- mayy need to be to accommodate. any bridge. addition to III. Date: CRP 07/27/2015 CRP.

Clay Street Bridge Replacement Project

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016

Goal 1 To establish and follow land use patterns for the long-range development of the campus.

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 TH 14 WEST STUDY AREA Project Description Functional Classification Purpose of the Project

IOWA HIGHWAY 57 / WEST 1 ST STREET STUDY PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING APRIL 22, 2014

Appendix E Preliminary Location Hydraulic Study

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 9, KAUAI COUNTY CODE 1987, RELATING TO STREET REQUIRE:MENTS FOR SUBDIVISIONS

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

Pittsburgh District Pittsburgh, PA Notice No Closing Date: May 29, 2015

G. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT. The following summarizes the Recreation and Open Space Element:

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

September 26, Ms. Elizabeth Hughes State Historic Preservation Officer Maryland Historical Trust 100 Community Place Crownsville MD

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

SBCAG STAFF REPORT. MEETING DATE: March 17, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: 5I

7.0 SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Appendix I. Checklists

ARGENTA TRAIL (CSAH 28/63) REALIGNMENT SOUTH PROJECT (CP 63-25)

Public Information Meeting

Public Meeting. US Highway 14 (6TH Street) from Main Ave to Medary Ave Urban Reconstruction Project Brookings, SD P-PH 0014(179)419 PCN 027B

Beckett Bridge PD& E Study. Presentation to: Board of County Commissioners

DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference June 21, 2013 TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) WORKSHOP

SUMMARY. Support the Southeast Arkansas Regional Intermodal Facility.

2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC

PARTF Scoring System for Grants

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

7.0 SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION

Mississippi Skyway Preliminary Engineering Report

Project Description WOO/LUC-SR /0.00. Waterville Bridge Replacement

Provide and maintain sufficient public parks, recreation facilities, and open space to meet the recreational needs of County residents and visitors.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Section 1. Executive Summary

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Rutherford County Projects

Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run

LEGAL NOTICE. City of Tacoma Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance. Fred Wagner, Wagner Development. Demolition of Manitou school buildings

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Bostwick Road. Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Public Information Centre #2 June 14, City of London

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

S SUMMARY S.1 PREFACE S.2 PURPOSE AND NEED S.3 PROJECT BACKGROUND

The transportation system in a community is an

7.0 DRAFT SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION

PUBLIC HEARING. Thursday, December 14, 2017 FDOT Urban Office 2198 Edison Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32204

LITTLE ITALY UNIVERSITY CIRCLE (MAYFIELD STATION) COMMUNITY MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2013

HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

To qualify for federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds a project must meet two basic federal requirements:

STAFF SUMMARY FOR S17-02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on January 14, 2010, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

Maury County Projects

Decision Notice. Proposed Action

Definitions. Average Daily Traffic Demand (ADT): The actual number or projected number of cars that pass a point in a 24-hour period.

City of Fort Lupton Site Plan Process

Chapter 13: Implementation Plan

RUTHERFORD NASHVILLE AREA MPO FY TIP - ADOPTED DECEMBER

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION... 1 A. General Description... 1 B. Historical Resume and Project Status... 2 C. Cost Estimates...

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

Revised Long Range Transportation Plan

OFFICE CONSOLIDATION SECONDARY PLAN AREA 22 THE BRAMALEA SOUTH INDUSTRIAL SECONDARY PLAN

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

CHARLES COUNTY GOVERNMENT RFP NO POPES CREEK RAIL TRAIL DESIGN

THE GARDEN CITY PLAN. City of St. Catharines Official Plan. City of St. Catharines

Southern Gateway Project and Public Green

ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS: SECTION 106 AND SECTION 4(F)

Resources Evaluated Relative to the Requirements of Section 4(f) and Proposed De Minimis Determination

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

RIVER ARTS DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION PROJECT

Transcription:

STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Suite 900 - James K. Polk Building 505 Deaderick Street Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0334 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Files Joe W. Matlock, Transportation Planner, Region IV NEPA Documentation Office Local Programs DATE: March 31, 2010 SUBJECT: Programmatic Categorical Exclusion for Improvements to SR 3/US 51/Elvis Presley Boulevard from SR 175/East Shelby Drive to I-55 City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee PIN #: 113028 The Local Government has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with environmental laws and regulations. The Local Government finds that the above referenced project as proposed will not directly, indirectly or cumulatively have any significant environmental impacts. It is Local Government s determination that this project complies with the criteria for Categorical Exclusions(CEs) for certain projects identified in 23 CFR Part 771.I 17(d) and further finds that if meets the conditions identified in September 2007 Programmatic Categorical Exclusion agreement with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This finding is herein submitted to the Tennessee Department of Transportation for environmental review. Project Purpose Elvis Presley Boulevard serves as both a gateway to an important tourist attraction, Graceland, as well as the major commercial corridor for residents of the Whitehaven community. Commercial decline, with increased vacancies and neglect, has resulted in an increase in crime and a deteriorated appearance along a corridor intended to welcome visitors to both Graceland and the City of Memphis. A variety of economic development plans prepared by local residents, the City and Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. (the company managing Graceland and related attractions) call for improvements along the corridor to spur redevelopment and create a more appropriate and welcoming gateway entrance to Graceland and the City.

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion for Improvements to SR 3/US 51/Elvis Presley Boulevard from SR 175/East Shelby Drive to I-55 City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee PIN #: 113028 Page 2 Due to the age of the roadway and the heavy levels of truck traffic, the road condition has deteriorated, creating safety issues in the area. Additionally, the high levels of pedestrian traffic associated with Graceland and the lack of both pedestrian-friendly crossings and continuous sidewalks create an unwelcoming and potentially unsafe environment for tourists and other pedestrians moving through the corridor. The purpose of the proposed project, as defined in the Transportation Planning Report, includes: 1. Support Memphis tourism goals; 2. Support planned economic development and enhance opportunities for redevelopment; 3. Address safety issues and deficiencies along the corridor; and 4. Enhance multimodal travel in the Whitehaven area. Project Description Proposed project improvements were evaluated in a Transportation Planning Report (TPR), approved by TDOT in July of 2009. Two alternatives were studied for each of the three project segments described above. The City of Memphis selected Alternative 1 for all three of the segments because it would have substantially fewer property impacts but would still meet the project purpose and need. The City of Memphis proposes streetscape improvements along a 2.81-mile long segment of Elvis Presley Boulevard from SR 185/East Shelby Drive to I-55. Improvements proposed for all segments of the project corridor include: New or upgraded sidewalks and crosswalks; Landscaping; New lighting standards; Curb and gutter; A buffer strip that can accommodate landscaping between the curb and sidewalk; and New pavement. Specific improvements proposed for each of the three project segments are outlined in the attached file: Conclusion Local Government has certified to the Environmental Division that the preparer and or the appropriate Local Government official have read and understand the conditions for Programmatic Categorical Exclusions as specified in the appendix of this document and that the information provided to TDOT meets those conditions to the best of their knowledge and understanding. And that this project has been appropriately coordinated with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Tennessee State Historic Preservation Office. The Environmental Division TDOT has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with environmental laws and regulations. The project as proposed will not directly, indirectly or cumulatively have any significant environmental impacts. Therefore it is this office s finding that this project complies with the criteria for Categorical Exclusions (CEs) for certain projects identified in 23 CFR Part 771.I 17(d). This office further finds that this project meets the conditions identified in September 2007 Programmatic Categorical Exclusion agreement with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This memorandum and the attached appendix document this determination. This project has environmental approval as of the date of this memorandum.

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion for Improvements to SR 3/US 51/Elvis Presley Boulevard from SR 175/East Shelby Drive to I-55 City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee PIN #: 113028 Page 3 JWM: jwm Attachments CC: TDOT HQ Staff TDOT Regional Staff TDOT Environmental Division Staff Mr. Ronnie Porter Local Government

Attachments

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 1 Project Location Maps and Preliminary Project Plans

Project in Its Regional Context Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 2

Project Location Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 3

FHWA-TDOT Programmatic Agreement Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 6

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 7

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 8

9 Transportation Improvement Program Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 9

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 10

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 11 Cultural Resources

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 12

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 13 Ecology

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 14

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 15 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 16

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 17

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 18

Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 19 Hazardous Materials

Air and Noise Impacts Air Quality Transportation Conformity This resurfacing project is exempt from conformity per 40 CFR 93.126. Mobile Air Source Toxics (MSATs) Since the project is exempt from conformity, it is also exempt from MSATs analysis. The project is Type I so a noise study is not needed. Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 21

MEMORANDUM To: Jim Ozment, Transportation Manager II NEPA Documentation Office Date: March 31, 2010 File Name: Programmatic Categorical Exclusion for Improvements to SR 3/US 51/Elvis Presley Boulevard From SR 175/East Shelby Drive to Interstate 55 City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee PIN #: 113028 Mr. Ozment Project Information The City of Memphis proposes to improve a section of State Route (SR) 3/US 51/Elvis Presley Boulevard (Elvis Presley Boulevard) from SR 175/East Shelby Drive to Interstate 55 (I-55). The proposed project will be partially funded with Transportation Enhancement Grant funding directed to the City of Memphis through the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) Local Programs office, and is thus subject to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In addition, the Memphis Metropolitan Planning Organization s (MPO) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) specifies additional federal funding assistance through the Transportation, Community and System Preservation Program (TCSP). The MPO which includes the City of Memphis, amended its TIP on January 28, 2010 to reflect the proposed project (see attachments). The project is listed in the TIP as TIP# ENH-2010-01. The proposed project is located in the City of Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee. Maps of the project in its regional context and of the project location are included in the attachments. Elvis Presley Boulevard is an Urban Principal Arterial and serves as a connection between the City of Memphis and Hernando, Mississippi. The project corridor provides access to Graceland, a major Memphis tourist attraction and National Historic Landmark (NHL); serves local residents as the primary commercial corridor within the Whitehaven community; and acts as an alternative route to nearby I-55 for regional truck traffic serving the area around the Memphis International Airport. The project corridor, between SR 175/East Shelby Drive and I-55, is approximately 2.81 miles in length and has been divided into three segments. Segment 1 (1.60 miles in length), from SR 175/East Shelby Drive to Craft Road, consists of four to five travel lanes with a center turn lane within 80 to 90 feet of right-of-way (ROW). Segment 2 (0.69 mile in length), which contains Graceland, extends from Craft Road to Winchester Road and is considered the priority segment for improvements. ROW along Segment 2 ranges from 91 to 121 feet, with the widest ROW adjacent to the Graceland Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 26 1

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Elvis Presley Boulevard, City of Memphis, Shelby County, TN PIN 113028.00 property. The existing typical section along Segment 2 includes three southbound and two northbound travel lanes and a center turn lane. Through the Graceland property frontage, the turn lane is replaced by a raised grass, landscaped median. North of the Graceland property, the roadway widens to six travel lanes and the median is replaced by a center turn lane. Segment 3 (0.62 mile in length), from Winchester Road to I-55, consists of six travel lanes and a center turn lane within 100 feet of ROW. There are six-foot existing sidewalks in some locations along the project corridor. The proposed projects meet all criteria of the September 10, 2007 Programmatic Agreement between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and TDOT (attached). Project Description Proposed project improvements were evaluated in a Transportation Planning Report (TPR), approved by TDOT in July of 2009. Two alternatives were studied for each of the three project segments described above. The City of Memphis selected Alternative 1 for all three of the segments because it would have substantially fewer property impacts but would still meet the project purpose and need. The City of Memphis proposes streetscape improvements along a 2.81-mile long segment of Elvis Presley Boulevard from SR 185/East Shelby Drive to I-55. Improvements proposed for all segments of the project corridor include: New or upgraded sidewalks and crosswalks; Landscaping; New lighting standards; Curb and gutter; A buffer strip that can accommodate landscaping between the curb and sidewalk; and New pavement. Specific improvements proposed for each of the three project segments are outlined below: Segment 1, Alternate 1: Improvements proposed for Segment 1 include two 10-foot inside travel lanes, two 14-foot outside travel lanes to accommodate a shared vehicle/bicycle lane, a 12-foot center turn lane with special pavement treatment, 2-foot curb and gutter on each side of the roadway, 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the roadway, and a 3-foot buffer between curb and sidewalk to accommodate landscaping and lighting. Segment 2, Alternate 1: Improvements proposed for Segment 2 include six 11-foot travel lanes, a 12-foot center turn lane with raised median, 2-foot curb and gutter on each side of the roadway, 8-foot sidewalks on both sides of the roadway, and a 4.5-foot buffer between curb and sidewalk to accommodate landscaping and lighting. In front of the Graceland property at the location of the observational pull-out, the improvements will also include a 5-foot landscaping zone adjacent to the roadway curb, an additional 20 feet of pavement, and a 7.5-foot sidewalk to accommodate vehicles and pedestrians stopping along the roadway to take photographs of the Graceland property. Segment 3, Alternate 1: Improvements proposed for Segment 3 include six 11-foot travel lanes, a 12-foot center turn lane with special pavement treatment, 2-foot curb and gutter on both sides of the roadway, 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the roadway, and a 4-foot buffer between curb and sidewalk to accommodate landscaping and lighting. All proposed improvements will occur primarily within existing ROW, with only minimal additional ROW required. No ROW would be acquired from the historic Graceland property. Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 27 2

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Elvis Presley Boulevard, City of Memphis, Shelby County, TN PIN 113028.00 Purpose and Need The purpose and need for the proposed project was defined in the TPR. Elvis Presley Boulevard serves as both a gateway to an important tourist attraction, Graceland, as well as the major commercial corridor for residents of the Whitehaven community. Commercial decline, with increased vacancies and neglect, has resulted in an increase in crime and a deteriorated appearance along a corridor intended to welcome visitors to both Graceland and the City of Memphis. A variety of economic development plans prepared by local residents, the City and Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. (the company managing Graceland and related attractions) call for improvements along the corridor to spur redevelopment and create a more appropriate and welcoming gateway entrance to Graceland and the City. Due to the age of the roadway and the heavy levels of truck traffic, the road condition has deteriorated, creating safety issues in the area. Additionally, the high levels of pedestrian traffic associated with Graceland and the lack of both pedestrian-friendly crossings and continuous sidewalks create an unwelcoming and potentially unsafe environment for tourists and other pedestrians moving through the corridor. The purpose of the proposed project, as defined in the TPR, includes: 1. Support Memphis tourism goals; 2. Support planned economic development and enhance opportunities for redevelopment; 3. Address safety issues and deficiencies along the corridor; and 4. Enhance multimodal travel in the Whitehaven area. Right or Way and Relocation Impacts This project will be constructed within the existing right of way. This project will not involve any relocations. Should it be found that any new right of way or easements be required Local Government will carry out a right-of-way and relocation program. This program will be in accordance with the Tennessee Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1972 and the Uniform Relocation and Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646). Cultural Resources Section 4 (f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (as amended) The proposed project will not affect any lands or properties protected under Section 4 (f). No public parks or recreation lands, wildlife or waterfowl refuges, or known historical or archaeological sites of local, state or national significance, as listed in the National Register of Historic Places will be involved. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Native American Coordination The 2001 Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations, 36 CFR 800, stipulates that Indian tribes that attach religious and cultural significance to properties that may be affected by an undertaking be invited to participate in the project review process as consulting parties. This project is exempt from this requirement as it requires no new right of way. Archaeological, Historical Preservation, Architectural Survey and Findings Pursuant to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and implementing regulations 36 CFR 800, a survey is required by Local Government Contract Cultural Resource employees to identify National Register listed or eligible resources (eligibility criteria are set forth in 36 CFR 60.4) within the area of potential effect of the proposed project. The surveyed includes areas that might possibly be affected by changes in air quality, noise levels, setting, and land use. It is the opinion of the Local Government that the project, as Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 28 3

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Elvis Presley Boulevard, City of Memphis, Shelby County, TN PIN 113028.00 presently designed, will have no effect on any archaeological, architectural or historical resources included in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places and that there will be no Section 4(f) use of a historic property. The State Historic Preservation Officer has concurred with this finding and his letter of concurrence is included in the Appendix of this document Endangered Species Act of 1973 Coordination with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was undertaken regarding potential impacts to threatened and endangered species. In a letter dated October 27, 2009 (see attachments), the USFWS responded that available records did not indicate the presence of federally-listed threatened or endangered species in the project area. The USFWS stated that the proposed project did not appear to adversely impact fish and wildlife or their habitats, and the agency expressed no opposition to the proposed project. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 As the proposed project does not cross any streams and occurs primarily within existing ROW, no channelization is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. In a letter dated October 27, 2009 (see attachments), the USFWS concurred that the proposed project would have no adverse impacts on fish and wildlife or their habitats. Executive Order 11988 Floodplain Management According to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps, 100-year floodplains associated with Nonconnah Creek are located near the northern project terminus at I-55. A map depicting floodplains and their relationship to the project area is included in the attachments. As the proposed project involves streetscaping primarily within the existing ROW, the project is not anticipated to encroach upon the floodplain or impact beneficial floodplain values in the project area. Executive Order 11990 Wetlands National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps indicate that there are no known wetlands located within the project area. The nearest wetland is located approximately 1,200 feet east of the project corridor. A map depicting this wetland is included in the attachments. As there are no wetlands located within the project area, no wetland impacts are anticipated to result from the proposed project. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, a report outlining the potential historic/architectural and archaeological resources within the project area was prepared and submitted to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for review. The report, Assessment of Historic Architectural and Archaeological Resources and Project Effects, identified one historic property within the project s area of potential effect (APE): Graceland, the former home of Elvis Presley. As no land will be taken from within the NHL boundary of the property and the project is intended to enhance the setting around Graceland by upgrading the aesthetics and making the area more pedestrian-friendly, the report found that the property will not be adversely affected. Additionally, the land within the ROW where the project will occur has been previously disturbed by past roadway construction activities including roadway pavement, curbed median, curb and gutter, sidewalks and installation of utility lines and poles. As the proposed project involves the replacement of these features and no excavation work is anticipated to go below the grade of previous excavations, no impacts to potential archaeological resources are anticipated. Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 29 4

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Elvis Presley Boulevard, City of Memphis, Shelby County, TN PIN 113028.00 In a letter dated November 23, 2009 (see attachments), the SHPO concurred with the findings of the report that the proposed project will have no adverse impacts on historic architectural or archaeological resources within the project area. Hazardous Materials According to a search of EPA CERCLIS and TDEC databases, there are no known hazardous materials sites located in the proposed project area. Three sites listed in the state s Dry Cleaner Environmental Response Program (DCERP) are located along Elvis Presley Boulevard. Additionally, there are 23 gas and service stations that operate Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) in the project area. The locations of the DCERP sites and USTs are identified on a map included in the attachments. As the proposed project consists primarily of roadway resurfacing and reconstruction of deteriorated sidewalks largely within the existing ROW, impacts to USTs and DCERP sites are not anticipated. Air Quality This proposed project is exempt from transportation conformity per 40 CFR 93.126. Since the proposed project is exempt from conformity, it is further exempt from Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs) analysis. Noise As the proposed project is not a Type I project, a noise study is not required. Bicycle and Pedestrian Impacts Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach is a policy statement adopted by the United States Department of Transportation. The Design Guidance incorporates as a key principle a policy statement that bicycling and walking facilities will be incorporated into all transportation projects unless exceptional circumstances exist. It is the policy of TDOT to routinely integrate bicycling and walking options into the transportation system as a means to improve mobility and safety of non-motorized traffic. This project will comply with the intent of this policy and will provide bicyclists and pedestrians full access to the project. Construction Impacts Adverse impacts from construction are primarily short-term in duration or exist only during construction periods. Some construction inconveniences such as noise, dust, traffic conflicts, etc., are unavoidable Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 30 5

Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Elvis Presley Boulevard, City of Memphis, Shelby County, TN PIN 113028.00 Conclusion The above findings demonstrate that the project as proposed will not directly, indirectly or cumulatively have any significant environmental impacts. Therefore it is the finding of the Local Government that this project complies with the criteria for Categorical Exclusions (CEs) for certain projects identified in 23 CFR Part 771.I 17(d). The Local Government further finds that this project meets the conditions identified in September 2007 Programmatic Categorical Exclusion agreement with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This memorandum and the attached appendix document this determination. The undersigned hereby certifies that I have read and understand the Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Agreement between the Federal Highway Administration Tennessee Division and the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT). I further certify that this project has been appropriately coordinated with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Tennessee State Historic Preservation Office. Signed Copy on file with the Local Government Wain Gaskins, P.E. City of Memphis, City Engineer Date: Signature of the highest ranking person in the local government having direct supervisory responsibility for the project, With Attachments Elvis Presley Boulevard Page 31 6