Murphy Crossing Site Redevelopment Community Engagement Meeting September 19, 2016

Similar documents
Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Pathways to Urban Sustainability

Chapter 1: Introduction

Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. Scoping Meeting August 2008

Transit Implementation Strategy Westside Study Group Meeting

ELK GROVE GENERAL PLAN VISION

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Town of Oakville Streetscape Strategy

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

Strategic plan framework Steering Committee Meeting

Equitable Growth Through TOD Planning

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

The Atlanta BeltLine. Quarterly Briefing March @atlantabeltline. Reynoldstown Senior Affordable Housing

Subareas 9 & 10 Master Plan Updates

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN

greenprint midtown SUSTAINABILITY ACTION PLAN 2012

Lynn Waterfront Master Plan

Mini Technical Assistance Panel. Rock Spring Park

FUNDING CORRIDOR REVITALIZATION

Market Demand and Land Use

Animating the Rideau Canal December 2013

1.0 Purpose of a Secondary Plan for the Masonville Transit Village

ASPEN HILL Minor Master Plan Amendment

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Fort McPherson Master Plan

Design Fort Ord. welcome why we are here what happened this week design guidelines: ideas so far 2/12/2015. Regional Urban Design Guidelines (RUDG)

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

WAC #7 3/14/14. Coachella General Plan Update

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

RE-Imagining the Downtown Colorado Springs Master Plan

Good Neighbor Plan Dallas Love Field Airport Transportation and Environment Committee

MALL REVITALIZATION CASE STUDIES

Streets, Connectivity & Built Environment Working Group August 2, 2017

City of Long Beach. creating vibrant and exciting places

WELCOME. Lemoyne Middle School Redevelopment Project Public Engagement Meeting #2. August 20, 2018

7Page 1 CLEMMONS COMMUNITY COMPASS 1 PLAN OVERVIEW

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Sahuarita District & Phase 1 Master Plan. Town Council December 11, 2017

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

Urban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas

About Momentum Midland

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

Visioning Statement and Guiding Principles

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

VIRGINIA / LAKE HIGHLAND TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY

Presenting a Vision for Thread Lake

Por favor, levanten la mano si necesita traduccion en espanol Please raise your hand if you need Spanish translation

THEMES, VISION, + PRINCIPLES

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

GOODY CLANCY WITH KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES RHODESIDE & HARWELL FARR ASSOCIATES W-ZHA

New Rochelle Arts + Cultural District Master Plan Conceptual Plan. February 4, 2015

12/9/2013. HOLLYWOOD/PINES CORRIDOR PROJECT AMPO 2013 Annual Conference October 24, Our Perspective. Broward.

John M. Fleming Managing Director, Planning and City Planner. Old East Village Dundas Street Corridor Secondary Plan Draft Terms of Reference

Promoting Economic Development Through Upfront SEPA Review: Lessons from South Downtown Tacoma

City of Le Sueur DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y JACKSON HIGHWAY & GRANT LINE EAST VISIONING STUDY

City of Ennis. Downtown Master Plan Catalyst Projects

SPRINGHILL LAKE TRANSIT VILLAGE

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

U T D N o r t h C a m p u s T O D and D o w n t o w n D e n t o n T O D

SUBJECT: Waterfront Hotel Planning Study Update TO: Planning and Development Committee FROM: Department of City Building. Recommendation: Purpose:

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

Public Open House #1

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Ann Arbor Downtown Street Design Manual. Ann Arbor DDA IDA 2015 Awards Planning Category

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

Vision & Land Use. Discussion. Historic Preservation Plan. Foggy Bottom Campus Plan:

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

Draft Cary Community Plan Review Part 3: Shop, Engage, Serve, Special Area Plans, Other Updates. October 27, 2015 Police Department Training Room

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Centers, Corridors and Wedges Update. Public Meeting April 20, 2010

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

CITY OF UNION CITY MINUTES GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

East Bench Master Plan Update

Create Policy Options Draft Plan Plan Approval. Public Consultation Events. Phase 2

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

WELCOME and introduction

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY WORKING GROUP AND CHARGE

WELCOME. The Yonge-Eglinton area has experienced significant growth and change in the last decade.

Hopkins. Development Guidelines May Overview. Sponsored by: Blake Road Corridor Collaborative City of Hopkins

1.0 VISION STATEMENT. December 6, PRINCIPLES

Welcome to Our Open House


WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Public may provide comments on the GDP within the next two weeks (December 24)

Transcription:

Murphy Crossing Site Redevelopment Community Engagement Meeting September 19, 2016

SUMMARY 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STATEMENT OF PURPOSE ABI has conducted a detailed study of 1. Market potential 2. Building & site analysis 3. Transportation Needs 4. Site Activation Needs 5. Community Stakeholder Outreach 6. Case Studies of similar developments Establish Strategic Activation Options MURPHY CROSSING 2

MURPHY CROSSING COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TIMELINE March 24 Group Meeting April 19 Special Call Study Group Meeting May 17 Special Call Study Group Meeting Summer Follow-up Meeting (September 19) MURPHY CROSSING 3

Summary Map of Atlanta and Murphy Crossing MURPHY CROSSING 4

Sylvan Road SW Summary Map of Murphy Crossing Study Area Interstate 20 Warner Street SW The Murphy Crossing Study Area ( Study Area ) is the area being considered in the Market and Economic Analysis. It consists of a one mile radius extending from the center of the site. The Study Area encompasses the neighborhoods of Adair Park, Oakland City, West End, Capital View, and Pittsburgh. MURPHY CROSSING 5

Sylvan Road SW Neighboring Developments Map of Nearby Projects under Development Interstate 20 Turner Field Redevelopment Warehouse Row Murphy Crossing Warner Street SW Fort McPherson Redevelopment 352 University Ave. Mixed-Use Project MURPHY CROSSING 6

Summary Demographic and Economic Conditions While the demographic and economic conditions in the Murphy Crossing area are more challenging relative to the Atlanta Metro Area, the redevelopment of Murphy Crossing can help accelerate economic opportunity for the surrounding community. Demographic Net population growth at Murphy Crossing has been flat over the past 15 years. Other parts of the Atlanta Metro Area are seeing more robust population increases. Incomes in the Study Area are low when compared to the surrounding Atlanta Metro Area. Murphy Crossing has a fewer number of working-age residents than other areas studied. Economic Murphy Crossing saw no growth in the number of working residents from 2002 to 2014. The share of residents making over $40,000 annually has grown slowly in the Study Area. The Atlanta Metro Area has seen steady job growth post-recession. MURPHY CROSSING 7

Summary Real Estate Market Conditions Traditional market analysis indicators do not reveal a natural demand for most product types, so redevelopment of Murphy Crossing must focus on place-making and creation of a curated destination to attract economic activity from beyond the immediate Study Area. Office There has been little new office development, and there are no high quality spaces for businesses to occupy. Despite low vacancy rates, Murphy Crossing is not a traditional office submarket. Careful curation of unique industrial buildings could make Murphy Crossing an alternative office destination. Retail Residential The majority of retail within the Study Area is small-scale and of relatively poor quality, with a Kroger supermarket on the edge of the 1mile radius Study Area. Low retail vacancy rates imply potential retail demand within the Study Area. Higher quality options could capitalize on the quality gap and reach new consumers. Home values in the Murphy Crossing area are lower than in other areas of Atlanta but are beginning to increase. Atlanta-area destination developments like Ponce City Market and Krog Street Market typically command a premium on multifamily residential rents. Industrial There are numerous industrial properties around Murphy Crossing. Regional developers state there is demand for light industrial or flex space. MURPHY CROSSING 8

Summary Building and Transportation Evaluations Toward achieving this new place-making objective at Murphy Crossing, Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. will need to make tactical investments to address the condition of existing buildings, improve access to the property from the surrounding community, and improve circulation within the property. Building Evaluation Most buildings require at least moderate repairs. The site s 233,473 square foot building portfolio provides flexibility and space for significant amounts of job creation. Buildings located on the northern portion of the site and a new, Atlanta BeltLine-adjacent Event Lawn have the potential to activate the site due to their visibility and locational advantages. Transportation Evaluation The site benefits from MARTA access (existing and proposed) and a forthcoming Atlanta BeltLine connection should be incorporated into transportation planning for the site. A new internal street grid should be implemented in order to increase flow throughout the site. Several projects should be undertaken to connect roadways surrounding the site, thus improving vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access. MURPHY CROSSING 9

Summary Case Study Assessment, Phasing Strategy, and Development Concepts Redevelopment of Murphy Crossing can leverage regional and national case studies of mixed-use and adaptive reuse projects to identify best practices and strategies for phasing, activation, and long-term uses. Case Study Assessment Successful redevelopments of similarly challenged industrial sites had robust phasing strategies, capitalized on location and transportation advantages, and had clear master planning. Deliberate redevelopment and activation works. Unsuccessful redevelopments were poorly phased or too intricately linked to the economic success of private developers. Phasing Strategy The creation of a Murphy Crossing identity is paramount interim uses and activation strategies are vital to achieving this goal. As the site gains activity and visibility, a more diverse set of uses can be incorporated. In the long-term, the Murphy Crossing site has the potential to increase in density. Development Concepts Murphy Crossing s diverse building portfolio provides flexibility for activation and initial development. Each concept has distinct advantages depending on Atlanta BeltLine s priorities, certain concepts can be incorporated during different development phases. MURPHY CROSSING 10

Summary Implications for the Future of the Murphy Crossing Site Short Term (1-5 years) Economically, the Murphy Crossing Study Area is economically challenged, though recent home sale prices in the area imply economic growth and change. The development of the Murphy Crossing site may expedite this economic progress. The Murphy Crossing Study Area may experience significant access and transportation improvements in the short term. With the completion of the Westside trail, ease of access to the site will increase. There are additional opportunities to improve connectivity to the Study Area and site through further road improvements and the addition of a MARTA infill station. Development at Murphy Crossing should prioritize activation of the site in the short-term. Best practices and other lessons can be learned from similar, nearby developments as how to best activate a site in this area of Atlanta. National and international case studies of similar industrial redevelopments can help shape a vision for what Murphy Crossing can become. Early infrastructure improvements will be necessary to prepare the site for public use. Zoning and replatting adjustments may be necessary to prepare the site for activation. Interim uses can be utilized to bring activity to the site and create an identity for Murphy Crossing. These uses can be incorporated into existing buildings with little investment in building adaptation. By emulating strategies seen in the case studies and concepts, Murphy Crossing could initially create the foundation for supporting a new market for a mixed-use destination for jobs, housing and recreation. At the same time, development must be tailored to the site and respond to the heritage of Murphy Crossing and the needs of the surrounding community. MURPHY CROSSING 11

Market Study Other Atlanta BeltLine Projects Overview In order to provide a vision for future development at the Murphy Crossing site, additional projects on the Atlanta BeltLine were chosen as successful examples of similar redevelopment projects. The two sites chosen are adjacent to the Atlanta BeltLine and were completed in the past several years. Both developments took an industrial site and created a mixed-use, market-style destination that retrofitted existing, historic buildings to meet a modern need. The two chosen developments are Ponce City Market and Krog Street Market. These developments are analyzed throughout this report in order to give context to the development potential of the Murphy Crossing site. Similar to the Murphy Crossing Study Area, the study areas surrounding these markets are 1 mile radii catchment zones. Ponce City Market Krog Street Market MURPHY CROSSING 12

Introduction Ponce City Market Area Overview The Ponce City Market Study Area consists of a one mile ring radius surrounding Ponce City Market. Located in the Old Fourth Ward or Poncey Highlands neighborhood, Ponce City Market is a recently redeveloped mixed-use site located adjacent to the Atlanta BeltLine. Opened on August 25 th, 2014, Ponce City Market has become a local destination featuring restaurants, retail, residential, and office uses. Ponce Market Study Area MURPHY CROSSING 13

Introduction Krog Street Market Area Overview The Krog Street Market Study Area consists of a one mile ring radius surrounding Krog Street area. Directly off the Atlanta BeltLine, Krog Street area is located in Inman Park on the east side of Atlanta. Krog Street Market is housed in the former Atlanta Stove Works building and was opened in the summer of 2014. The complex combines local merchants and restaurants with over 250 apartments and flex office space in the Krog St, Irwin St and Edgewood Rd area. Krog Street Market Study Area MURPHY CROSSING 14

PROJECT PHASING GREENSBORO DOWNTOWN AREA INVESTMENT STRATEGY Working Draft, April 2010 15 15

Project Phasing Objectives As reflected in the market assessment, the market potential of the Murphy Crossing site is neither clear nor immediately evident. However, and as indicated by the case studies reviewed, deliberate creation of a destination can be successful and attraction of job opportunities can raise economic achievement levels. While developments in other parts of Atlanta have utilized proximity to the Atlanta BeltLine to create successful mixed-use developments that transformed underutilized space, areas near Murphy Crossing does not possess the same degree of existing investment interest. To overcome this challenge, Atlanta BeltLine should focus on a multi-step approach for Murphy Crossing to stabilize and activate the site, working toward the creation of a market-making destination that builds momentum for long-term reuse. Site stabilization Interim site activation uses Mid-term site uses Long-term site uses Site Stabilization Interim Site Activation Uses Mid-Term Site Uses Long-Term Site Uses MURPHY CROSSING 16

Project Phasing Site Stabilization To prepare the Murphy Crossing site for new uses, there are a number of steps that must be taken that to ensure that it is a safe, attractive, and welcoming environment for new activation and development. Basic site needs that must be addressed include: Targeted removal of buildings that are encumbrances or non-salvageable Installation of restrooms in public areas Installation of utilities to support new uses Construction of temporary roadways and parking spaces to access the interior of the site Installation of fencing to close off areas not currently open to the public or that present safety challenges Development of green space for site activation Area of Focus Site Stabilization Interim Site Activation Uses Mid-Term Site Uses Long-Term Site Uses MURPHY CROSSING 17

Project Phasing Site Stabilization Location: The focus of site stabilization will be on areas that will be used in the shortterm and areas directly adjacent to the Atlanta BeltLine will be important. However, site stabilization will likely be necessary to some degree across all parts of the site. Costs: A large portion of site stabilization costs will be the responsibility of Atlanta BeltLine Inc. Other costs may be deferred to individual developers. Area of Focus ***This diagram is a concept and does not constitute an approved site plan or other use commitment Site Stabilization Interim Site Activation Uses MURPHY CROSSING 18

Project Phasing Once the Murphy Crossing site has been stabilized, attention will shift to the creation of interim uses that activate the site. The focus of interim site uses will be on uses that don t require extensive build out of space and can begin to establish an identity for Murphy Crossing. Examples interim site activation include: Interim Site Activation Uses Events / Festivals Outdoor movies on the Lawn Food truck events Live music Flea markets / Pop-up markets Farmers Market Public art / Art installations Sporting events *** Use examples do not reflect committed uses for the site but are intended for informational purposes only. Site Stabilization Interim Site Activation Uses MURPHY CROSSING 19

Project Phasing Location: Interim site uses should leverage the adjacency of the site to the Atlanta BeltLine and traffic that it generates. The creation of an Event Lawn along the Atlanta BeltLine will be critical in the success of interim uses that require open space. Buildings 3 and 4 have particular relevance for potentially holding light industrial, jobcreating tenants. Costs: Emphasis for initial site activation will be on uses and activities that can be provided at a very low cost. Uses requiring significant investment will be difficult to attract to the site before market potential is demonstrated in some way. Interim Site Activation Uses Area of Focus ***This diagram is a concept and does not constitute an approved site plan or other use commitment Site Stabilization Interim Site Activation Uses MURPHY CROSSING 20

THANK YOU GREENSBORO DOWNTOWN AREA INVESTMENT STRATEGY Working Draft, April 2010 21 21