Outline of remarks. Corridor ecology: a snapshot. Definitions, cont.

Similar documents
Consequences of Landscape Patterns on Flows of Energy, Nutrients, Organisms

Reconnect, Rewild & Restore

Landscape Ecology and Amphibians

Wildlife Connections 101: Confronting the Challenge of Habitat Fragmentation

Potential Solutions to Transportation-Wildlife Conflicts An Overview. Tony Clevenger WTI Montana State University

Conserving Large Landscapes One Highway at a Time

5. Initiating a restoration project

Lecture: Landscape Ecology

Phase I Ecological Network Report Terms of Reference

Landscape Ecology and EA in Ontario:

A Joined-up Regional Landscape: A Roadmap to connect the parts

Policy & Procedure Effective Date: Parks Department Page of

Countywide Green Infrastructure

Planning Considerations for Wildlife Passage in Urban Environments. (Prepared by Tony Clevenger, PhD)

Habitat Connectivity and Wildlife Corridor Stakeholder Meeting

Mosaic of patches Agents of patch formation: Environmental constraints (Abiotic) Biotic processes Disturbances (natural and human induced)

Virginia DCR- Natural Heritage Program. Tools for Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning

Public Review Draft Oceanside Subarea Habitat Conservation Plan/ Natural Communities Conservation Plan

COLORADO S Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy Linking Conservation and Transportation Planning August 15, 2006

Roads and Ecological Integrity. Best Management Practices. September 2016: Version 1.1

Can urban areas have ecological integrity?

Executive Summary. Essential Connectivity Map (Figure ES-1)

Rocky Areas Project Guidance HABITAT

GREENBANK DEVELOPMENT MASTERPLAN

Connectivity conservation: maintaining connections for nature

Objectives and Strategies for the Integration of Recreation, Parks and Open Space in Regional Plans

6Natural. Environment Development Permit Guidelines

Principles for Ecological Landscape Design in Brownfield Business Parks

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

UNIVERSITY TOWN NEIGHBOURHOODS 5.2 ECO-CORRIDOR MELBOURNE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 2014

Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE

One County s Success in Linking Watershed Protection and Land Use Planning

Incorporating climate change and connectivity into the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan

Review of 12/17/2012 meeting and other core team meetings. Review mapping approaches taken by other states

All Roads Lead to Fragmentation: Exploring Habitat Connectivity and Wildlife Underpasses through the Florida Panther and the Jaguar

Donaldson Run Tributary B Stream Restoration Project Update. February 23, 2011 Taylor Elementary School

A Network Theory Framework for Urban Cultural Heritage Conservation. Manal Ginzarly LEMA, Université de Liège

Monitoring for Ecological Integrity and State of the Parks Reporting

Tackling Difficult SEQR Topics

Study Area Map. Wasatch Hollow Open Space Restoration, Use, & Management Plan. Legend. Harrison Ave East. Roosevelt East.

Colorado Outdoor Partnership

NATIVE PLANTS. Native Plants. Exotic Plants

Landscape Strategies for Promotion of Urban Biodiversity Involvement of Ecologists Maryann Harris Past-President Irish Landscape Institute

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

ADDENDUM TO BIOLOGICAL SCOPING SURVEY REPORT, BOTANICAL SURVEY AND WETLAND DELINEATION

4. What are the goals of the Kawarthas, Naturally Connected project? 7. What are watersheds and why are they being used as the project boundaries?

Chapter 5: Natural Resources and Environment

4.0 KEY ISSUES AND MANAGEMENT ZONES

Grades & Levels Handout 1: high school (all levels) Handout 2: high school (advanced/ap) undergraduate (year 1 2)

4.3. Spacing of wildlife crossings Guidelines for the selection of wildlife crossings Wildlife crossing design types

Ecological Landscape Planning and Design of an Urban Landscape Fringe Area: A Case Study of Yang an District of Jiande City

Biodiversity and Urban Streets

Gloucester County s Comprehensive Plan. The Community Connection

Outline MANAGING INVASIVE PLANTS ON YOUR LAND. Invasive Species. Definitions 1/12/2015

Master Plan Objectives and Policies

Large Landscape Restoration and the National Park System

Antioch Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan

Surrey Ecosystem Management Study

Article 6 Tree Protection

A Master Plan for High Park s Hillside Garden and other Ornamental Gardens: Recommendations from the High Park Natural Environment Committee

City of Nogales General Plan

WHERE. is vegetation managed? Power lines. Rail lines. Oil and gas sites. Roadsides

Green Infrastructure Planning for Sustainability and Resiliency

Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed. STOP. Yes. Place on invasive plant list, no further investigation needed.

THE LANDSCAPE ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT MODEL AND ITS APPLICATIONS

Burrowing Owl Habitat Project at the Albany Plateau. (a component project of the Gilman Street Playing Fields Project City of Berkeley) March 10, 2006

Visual Impact Rating Form - Instructions

LIFE LINES - Linear Infrastructure Networks with Ecological Solutions LIFE14 NAT/PT/001081

Abbey Paulson Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Colorado Ramaley N122, UCB 334 Boulder, CO

3-2 Environmental Systems

Stormwater Standards. Clackamas County Service District No. 1. Planting Guide for Buffers

RIPARIAN HABITAT RESTORATION. Helen Swagerty Senior Restoration Biologist/Project Manager

Making Space for Nature A Leicester Case Study. Dr Helen O Brien Leicester City Council

Presentation. Effects of roads on fauna Loss, fragmentation and degradation of habitat. Questions

NJ Habitat Connectivity Initiative

AN ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR GREATER MANCHESTER. Frame work def. a support used as a basis for something being constructed

Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative

Linked Ecological and Economic State and Transition Model for Adaptive Management of Rangeland Ecosystems

Kibworth Harcourt. Introduction. Introduction


PRESENTATION ON JOHANNESBURG S BIODIVERSITY PROGRAMME

Could this be a concrete solution to biodiversity loss?

Los Angeles River-Arroyo Seco Confluence Restoration Vision Plan. Professor Meredith McKenzie, JD Urban & Regional Planning Dept Cal Poly Pomona

Public Services Committee Meeting Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 Time: 12:00 PM Location: City Hall - Boardroom 2-1

6.8 SCENIC HIGHWAYS Introduction

Working Group Meeting

City of Surrey Ecosystem Management Study. Integration of ecological processes with land use

Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design

GIS to Estimate Archaeological Site Loss and Develop Conservation Strategies

Basic Information: Vernal Pool Systems

Healthy land stewardship.

SUSTAINABILITY PLAN OTTAWA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FALL 2017

CALGARY: City of Animals Edited by Jim Ellis

Transportation Enhancements TE-2012-US Fish and Wildlife Service Quality of Life. Type of Improvement

Ecosystem services of Urban rivers

What is the EDPA? The EDPA has three objectives: 1. Protect biodiversity. 2. Mitigate damage during development. 3. Restore degraded ecosystems

An Evaluation of the Consequences of EIAs on KZN s Biodiversity Targets

I ll be talking about the Designing Sustainable Landscapes project today. This is a large integrated modeling effort our group at UMass has been

Greenways as an alternative to traditional infrastructure. Green Infrastructure

Arkansas River Corridor

Transcription:

Outline of remarks Corridor ecology: a snapshot William Z. Lidicker, Jr. Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley 1. Definitions of corridor a) Structural b) Functional 2. Advantages of corridors 3. Potential disadvantages Corridor definitions Corridors imply connections between entities, but how do we know if we have a wildlife corridor? And how do we know how to build one if we want one? Structural definitions are popular. 1. Based on linearity in shape, physical connection between patches of same community-type, physiognomic distinctiveness from adjacent matrix, and especially visibility on aerial photos. 2. May be continuous or stepping-stone. Definitions, cont. 3. May be natural or man-made. Functional definition 1. Does a presumptive corridor actually serve as a conduit for movement of organisms? 2. A corridor must enhance movements beyond what is possible through adjacent matrix, or assist in crossing a barrier to movements. 3. May not be visible in aerial photos, or may be visible, but not functional as corridor. 1

Definitions, concluded If a presumptive corridor is to be useful in conservation, it must function as a corridor, not necessarily look like one. It can be natural or man-made, or mixed. Such a functional definition means that corridors encompass a wide range of structures ranging from scent trails and culverts to huge swaths of natural habitat that connect similar communities on a continental scale. Schematic representation of two habitat patches connected by two continuous corridors and a stepping-stone corridor Riparian corridor in exurbian development, Bridger Mountains, near Bozeman, Montana A culvert undercrossing, trans-canada highway, Banff National Park; built in 1998 2

Wildlife overpass across trans-canada highway, Banff National Park, Alberta Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative: connecting the Rocky Mountain spine with 17 critical core and corridor areas Road sign signaling seasonal road closure to allow newts to cross a major park road to reach a breeding stream; Tilden Park, Contra Costa Co., Calif. Advantages of corridors Fragmentation leads to decreasing sizes of remaining habitat patches. Small fragments generate small populations of the organisms living in the patches. Small populations are at high risk of extinction for demographic, genetic, and stochastic reasons. Connecting such fragments through corridors or other means produces a metapopulation structure which has a much improved chance for sustainability. 3

Metapopulations and metacommunities Four types of metapopulations Persistence of metapopulations (and hence metacommunities) depends on two things. 1. Risk of demic extinction (population in a fragment) = mortality rate. 2. Rate of colonization of empty fragments = birth rate Movements among patches influence both death and birth rates, and so are critically important in this equation. Births (colonizations) must exceed or equal deaths for persistence of metapopulation. Potential disadvantages of corridors Disadvantages are less well understood than the advantages. While advantages generally exceed the disadvantages, understanding the possible negative consequences of corridors can help us to avoid them. Artificial or heavily human modified corridors are more likely to suffer negative effects than natural corridors. A culvert that helps mountain lions cross a freeway may not meet its objectives if it simply leads the lions into a suburban area. What are some potential disadvantages? 1. Edge effects a. Since corridors are often narrow, they may be largely or entirely edge in character. b. There is thus an increase in the total amount of edge in a given area. c. Edges may not be suitable for dispersal of interior species (those that avoid edges), and may increase the impact of predators, parasites, or competitors that either are attracted to edges or penetrate patches from the matrix. 2. Community drift changes in the community composition within the connected patches because of differential use of corridors a. Change in community-type over time b. Disruption of strong coactions may lead to cascade of extinctions. 4

Disadvantages, cont. 3. Invasion of exotic species a. Access through corridor, from the edge, or from the matrix b. Spread among patches 4. Invasion of deleterious native species a. Access to patch facilitated for predators, parasites, and competitors that negatively impact target species within the patch that may be too few or too unhealthy to withstand their impact b. Virulence of pathogens may increase with connectedness. 5. Demographic impacts a. Spillover predation or parasitism b. Corridors as demographic sinks c. Synchrony among patches increases chances of metapopulation extinction d. Connected patches may support predators or parasites which could not persist if patches were isolated. e. Increased exposure to human depredations: humans are edge creatures themselves and hunt preferentially in corridors. Disadvantages, cont. 6. Social impacts a. Corridors may be inadequate for dispersal of social groups. b. Social fence effect of residents living in corridors. 7. Genetic impacts a. Outbreeding depression b. Loss of local adaptation c. Hybridization between taxonomic units d. Genetic swamping of rare species by invading exotic 8. Conflicting scientific objectives a. Corridor projects must be clear about objectives, priorities, and realistic possibilities, egs. provision of habitat or conduit; target species, land acquisition realities. Disadvantages, cont. b. Target species requirements vs metacommunity conservation c. Urgent short-term objectives versus long-term sustainability d. Alternative conservation strategies (corridors, matrix improvements, translocations) 9. Economic impacts a. Costs of acquisition and construction b. Costs of maintenance c. Costs of monitoring d. Lost opportunity costs e. Unforseen negative impacts on adjacent matrix f. Benefits generally ignored (education, aesthetics, research, increases in quality of life, biodiversity conservation, recreation, ecosystem services, employment opportunities) Conclusion Sometimes our best efforts end badly, but mostly we can look forward to achieving significant improvements in the human predicament. Keep trying! A mule deer in Utah whose dispersal attempt was unsuccessful 5