Standards (R-3) Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit

Similar documents
Concrete Flat Tile Roofs Large Exposed Overhangs Oversized Bracing Predominately Gable Roofs With Non-Plaster Gable End Treatments.

Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines November 18, 2015 B-35

Chapter 5: Mixed Use Neighborhood Character District

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

for Master Planned Development Framework Design Standards & Guidelines

4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

CHAPTER FIVE COMMUNITY DESIGN

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

ATTACHMENT A. SILVERDALE DESIGN STANDARDS Amendments to the Waaga Way Town Center Chapter

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

VILLAGES AT RIVERDALE

VILLAGES AT RIVERDALE

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

Chapter 3: Office & Office Mixed-Use Project Types

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

Greater East Wenatchee Urban Growth Area. Design Standards & Guidelines

SECTION V: DESIGN GUIDELINE EXAMPLES

5-4 SAN LUIS OBISPO AIRPORT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards July, 2015

Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Residential Development

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards July, 2015

Guidelines. Building 1. Zoning Provision Building height limit shall be 11m to the mid point of the roof. 2. Building setbacks see Sample Plan.

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

Urban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West

Appendix A COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon

INSTITUTIONAL USE DESIGN COMPATIBILITY TECHNIQUES

Cit of Kitchener Ur 6 an Design Manual PARTA. Desi n for _--::

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Draft Memorandum #1: Goals and Vision for Revitalization

Chapter 11. Industrial Design Guidelines 11.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 11.3 SITE PLANNING GUIDELINES 11.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

Design Guidelines and Development Standards for Southwood Ranch. Prepared February, 2016 by

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

(Note: bold typing indicates sections that have been added or modified from the currently adopted Design Guidelines.)

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Park Types and Attributes

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

Welcome! to Keller Town Hall

Planning Board Briefing

5.1 Site Plan Guidelines

Residential Design Guidelines

Division 9 Southwood Ranch (CR 484/475/475A Corridor-Gateway Development Overlay) Purpose and Intent Applicability.

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

E. Natural areas include habitats such as wetlands, tidal marshes, waterways, natural drainage-ways, woodlands and grassland meadows.

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Community Design Plan

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Buildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

2.5 Roads. Loading and service areas adjacent to Highway 401 should be screened through architectural walls and/or landscape buffer planting.

VILLA STORIA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. General Plan Amendment, Zone Amendment, Tentative Map, Development Plan, and Historic Permit

Single-Family Detached Residential Design Guidelines

GREENING THE BOULEVARD Master Plan Concepts for Venice Boulevard between Lincoln and Sawtelle

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

3.13. Development Guidelines

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

Urban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges

SEAPINES STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH MARCH 2017

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

Commercial Development Permit Area

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

Throughout. square. (Crystal City Vision Plan 2050)

New-Cast Mixed-use Development Proposal King Street West, Newcastle, Ontario

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

APPENDIX C. Architectural and Environmental Design Standards. Environmentally sensitive areas should be protected.

Proposed for Vic West Neighbourhood Plan. Design Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development - Townhouse and Attached Dwelling

Single-Family Attached Residential Design Standards

Gateway commercial MIXED USE MASTER SITE PLAN. CITILAND AIrDRIE GATEWAY VENTURE INC. airdrie GATEWAY COMMERCE CENTRE. airdrie, ALBERTA FEBRUARY 2012

Corridor Identity. Section 9. Introduction. Corridor Guiding Principles

BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

public review draft Key objectives for this chapter are:

Guidelines. Building. The minimum setback of an attached garage from the lot line shall be 6m. 4. Zoning Provision

MILTON HEIGHTS COMMUNITY January 2006 Revised February 2015 Revised November 2015

Urban Design Brief. Watson Parkway North & Watson Road North Guelph, Ontario. Prepared by Coletara Development

R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

Transcription:

Avila Ranch Avila Ranch Specific Plan Development Standards High Medium Density - High Residential Density Residential Lot and Building Lot and Standards Building (R-3) Standards (R-3) EXAMPLES These sketches shows a site layouts that would follow from the standards. Not all features shown in the sketch are standards. Public Street STANDARDS (minimums) Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Front Setback Dwelling Front Porch Rear Setback Dwelling Parking 1,000 N/A ft N/A 20 ft N/A 40 ft 15 ft 1510 ft ft 10 ft 10 10 ft ft 0 ft 0 ft N/A N/A N/A 15 ft 10 ft 10 ft 0 ft Side Setback (A) (applies to any structure, including covered parking) Street (corner lot) as as provided in in R-2 R-2 zone 15 15 ft ft as provided in R-2 zone 15 ft Figure B-11: R-3 Residential Standards Exhibit Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines B-13

Parking BUFFER BUFFER Earthwood Lane BUFFER Parking BUFFER Buildings Fronting and Oriented to Street Buildings Fronting and Oriented to Street Common Space Common Space Figure B-12: R-4 Residential Standards Exhibit B-14 Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines

Avila Ranch This Page Intentionally Left Blank Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines B-15

B.2 Pedestrian Activity Areas Neighborhood parks, open space trails, plazas, and amenities in the Town Center comprise the primary pedestrian activity areas within Avila Ranch. These areas are envisioned to encourage healthy, active lifestyles within individual neighborhoods while also providing a medium for ongoing neighborhood social events. R-1 Residential Road Standards B.2.1. Goal 5.3 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Pedestrian Activity Areas section. B.2.2. The northwestern and southwestern corners of Jespersen Drive/Horizon Lane at the R-1 Residential Road intersection (Town Center) shall include plazas of a minimum 1,200 square feet that are oriented towards the Neighborhood Park and Town Center Plaza as illustrated on Figure B-13. Neighborhood Commercial uses should have windows and entries that open up onto these plazas to ensure that there is interaction between these public spaces, retail, and services uses. These plaza areas shall also have a transit stop integrated into the final design in conjunction with input from SLO Transit or other transit provider. B.2.3. Mini Parks and Pocket Parks shall be provided within or adjacent to each individual neighborhood of Avila Ranch as delineated in Figure B-14 These parks shall be provided at a rate such that the total amount of Mini- Parks and Pocket Parks shall not be less than 5 acres per thousand population. Total Park areas, e.g. including the Neighborhood park, shall not be less than 10 acres per thousand population. Transit Stop Figure B-13: Town Center Plazas Plaza Plaza 1,200 sf min. 1,200 sf min. Plaza 2,500 sf min. Jespersen Drive Transit Stop B.2.4. A plaza shall be located within the Neighborhood Park directly across from the Town Center along Jespersen Drive/Horizon Lane of a minimum 2,500 square feet. This plaza is intended to be used for community gathering functions such as farmer s markets and shall include a transit stop. B-16 Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines

Avila Ranch Figure B-15 Figure B-14: Park Locations LEGEND Neighborhood Parks: Linear, Pocket, and Open Space Oriented Parks. Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines B-17

Guidelines A. Each neighborhood area should provide convenient access to the Tank Farm Creek pedestrian trail through the incorporation of multiple pathway entry points. See Figure B-15. B. The character of Jespersen Drive/Horizon Lane and the R-1 Residential Road abutting the Town Center should provide a pedestrian-friendly environment with accessible sidewalks, bulbouts, parkway landscaping, street trees, limited driveway access points, and reduced front building setbacks. C. Roundabout, bulbouts, and decorative paving should be incorporated at primary intersections locations such as Venture Drive/Earthwood Lane or Jespersen Drive/R-1 Residential Road, where appropriate. Roundabouts shall provide decorative landscaping, including trees that provide for monumentation and reference points within the project. The Town Center roundabout shall also include agricultural implements such as water towers and windmills to accentuate the agricultural design character of the Town Center. D. The Neighborhood Park should be designed to provide neighborhood recreation needs including a mix of passive and active areas that foster social interaction and healthy lifestyles. E. Neighborhood Park facilities may include informal turf areas, bocce ball courts, children s play areas, group barbeque areas, group picnic facilities and shade structures, clubhouse, pool, pedestrian and bicycle trails, and community gardens. Earthwood Lane Tank Farm Creek Figure B-15: Neighborhood Access to Tank Farm Creek Tank Farm Creek Trail Entry Points F. Programming of the Neighborhood Park may include shared facilities or related uses with on-site agricultural production such as outdoor learning areas, picnic, farming and cooking demonstrations, and a farm stand. G. The plaza located within the Neighborhood Park directly across from the Town Center should incorporate ample seating, trash receptacles, bicycle racks, a central organizing feature, unique landscaping, and pervious hardscape. B-18 Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines

Avila Ranch B.3 Parking Parking is an essential component of all proposed land uses within the Avila Ranch project. Ensuring adequate buffering between abutting land uses, public streets, and commercial parking areas will ensure the promotion of the high-quality environment envisioned for the development. Parking requirements for specific land uses within Avila Ranch are found within Chapter 17.16.060 of the City of San Luis Obispo Municipal Code. Parking for the R-2 zone shall be provided with two covered spaces per unit, on street parking, and at least two on-site guest parking spaces per 6-pack or 4-pack cluster. Parking stalls to be designed per Engineering Standards 2220. Standards B.3.1. Goal 5.4 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Parking section. BUFFER R-1 Residential Road Jespersen Drive Minimum 10 Foot Landscaped Buffer. Planted with trees of substantial height for vertical screening. Driveway access along R-1 Residential Road B.3.2. Parking for the Neighborhood Park shall be provided through both on-site parking and shared parking with the Town Center commercial area. Any on-site parking associated with the Neighborhood Park shall be located within a parking lot or other parking space configurations on the north side of the park. These parking lots shall provide for bicycle storage, staging areas, and special event parking. B.3.3. Driveway access points for the Neighborhood Commercial Town Center shall be located along the R-1 Residential Road adjacent to the R-1 Residential zone as shown in Figure B-16. B.3.4. Parking shall be designed and sited to minimize and buffer commercial noise from adjacent residential land uses. Figure B-16: Neighborhood Commercial Driveway Access B.3.5. A ten foot minimum landscape buffer shall be provided on the Neighborhood Commercial properties adjacent to the R-1 Residential zone and the Neighborhood Commercial Town Center. In addition there shall be a minimum forty-five (45) foot rear yard for any R-1 units that back onto the Neighborhood Commercial properties due to ALUP Safety Area requirements. B.3.6. Parking for the R-4 units shall be carports for added noise mitigation and visual screening. Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines B-19

Guidelines A. Residential walkways within front yard setbacks should utilize alternative paving materials such as stamped/ colored concrete, paving stones, tiles, and/or bricks B. Parking courts and common driveways should incorporate accent paving that emphasizes pedestrian connections to main residential entries, and should utilize alternative paving materials such as stamped/colored concrete, paving stones, tiles, and/or bricks. B.4 Outdoor Use Areas While outdoor use areas, as defined by the AASP, are unlikely to occur within the project area, any outdoor use areas proposed in conjunction with Avila Ranch land uses will meet the standards and guidelines outlined within the AASP. Standard B.4.1 Goal 5.5 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Outdoor Use Areas section. B.5 Screening Service, storage areas, trash and recycling collection areas, and utilities associated with proposed Avila Ranch land uses will be properly screened to minimize visual impact and promote the natural, unobstructed open space views. Standard B.5.1 Goal 5.6 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Screening section. Guideline A. Equipment related to on-site agricultural production should be properly stored and screened from public view. C. Preservation of Views and Scenic Resources C.1 Views from the Road The City of San Luis Obispo General Plan identifies Buckley Road as a scenic corridor that should be maintained in order to protect views of surrounding open space resources. A minimum 300-foot wide buffer has been incorporated into the Avila Ranch Development Plan along Buckley Road to maintain the scenic nature and the rural/agricultural character of this corridor. Uses within this buffer provide a wide range of amenities for the area including accessible multi-use trails, naturalized open spaces, and agriculture production. Views of structures visible from Buckley Road are minimized through the incorporation of landscaping and natural screening techniques. Standards C.1.1 Goal 5.7 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Views from the Road section. B-20 Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines

Avila Ranch C.1.2 Views along Buckley Road towards the Irish Hills to the west and towards the Santa Lucia range and foothills to the east shall be maintained through the incorporation of an open space and park buffer of a minimum 300 feet wide along Buckley Road as shown in Figure B-17. C.1.3 Views along Jespersen Drive at the crossing of Tank Farm Creek shall be maintained to maximize views of surrounding open spaces. Guidelines A. Visible building facades from Buckley Road should be minimized to maintain the scenic nature of the corridor through landscaping and/or other natural screening techniques. B. Cul-de-sacs should be open ended and/or dead-end onto open space or park areas. C.2 Gateways The AASP does not identify areas within the Avila Ranch development as possible locations of a gateway for the City of San Luis Obispo. If a gateway is identified and proposed on the Avila Ranch site within the future, goals, standards, and guidelines found within the AASP will take precedent. Standard C.2.1 Goal 5.8 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Gateways section. C.2.2 A project complimentary (e.g. Figure B-1) Entry Gateway shall be provided at intersection of Jespersen Drive and Buckley Road. See Figure B-5. R-1 Units abutting the 300 foot Buckley buffer/url are limited to single story height for noise compatibility unless noise study demonstrates consistency with city noise standards Landscaped Berm shall include existing and additional rock outcroppings, riparian tree species, and native shrubs R-1 Residential Zone Landscaped Berm Figure B-17: Buckley Road Agriculture and Open Space Buffer Section Multi-Use Trail 300 Buffer Buckley Road Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines B-21

Residential walkway. Figure B-18: Residential Character along typical residential street. B-22 Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines

Avila Ranch D. Architecture D.1 Architectural Character The architectural character of Avila Ranch is to be representative of the agricultural heritage associated with southern San Luis Obispo as well as architectural styles typically found within the city. A contextual appropriate selection of architectural styles aides in defining the context of the site from the rural character along the southern property line to the industrial character found along the northern property edge. A list of permitted architectural styles appropriate for each land use within Avila Ranch has been provided to ensure consistency with the overall project vision. Standards D.1.1 Goal 5.9 (and associated standards and guidelines) incorporated as part of this Avila Ranch Architectural Character section. D.1.2 The architectural styles for residential land uses within Avila Ranch shall be Agrarian, California Bungalow, Contemporary, Craftsman, or Mission as illustrated in Figures B-19 through B-23. Steep Pitch Gable Fronts e.g. 6:12 Vertical Accent e.g. Board and Batt siding Metal Accent Roof at Porches Vertical Window Proportions Figure B-19: Agrarian Architecture Style Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines B-23

Low Pitch Predominately Hip Roofs e.g. 3:12 Flat Concrete Tile Roofs Minimal Trim Simple Columns Figure B-20: California Bungalow Architectural Style Non Plaster Wainscot Accent, e.g. Brick or Stone Low Pitch or Flat Roofs Predominately Shed Smooth Plaster Finish with Score Line Features Large Simple Windows Simple Columns Non Plaster Accent Feature Figure B-21: Contemporary Architectural Style e.g. Mid-Century Modern B-24 Appendix B - Design Standards and Guidelines