These meeting minutes summarize the community meeting held on February 22 nd, 2018 with the Greater Park Hill community.

Similar documents
Building Great Neighbourhoods. Strathcona

PUBLIC MEETING APRIL 21, 2016

North Adelaide Playspace and Pocket Orchard

More than 30 adults and 19 children were involved in these community workshops.

DRAFT IMPACCT BROOKLYN VISIONING SESSION WITH MYRTLE VILLAGE GREEN SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SUNDAY OCTOBER 2, MYRTLE AVE, BROOKLYN NY

Barrie Park Site Master Plan

MASTERPLAN AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS

Meeting Notes. Meeting Date: Feb. 28, Re: Public Meeting #2 Cornerstone Baptist Church Date Issued: February 29, 2012 Compiled By: Paul Thomas

Section 4 - Public Realm & Landscape proposals Landscape Masterplan. Section 4 52

Haysboro Community Park: Building Community through Play

Urban Design and Livability

M E E T I N G S U M M A R Y

Benedict Fountain Park Meeting Notes Wednesday, February 15, 2012

ROSENTHAL CARPARK LIFE BETWEEN BUILDINGS IN LANE COVE

Executive Summary Public Space / Community Space

ANCHORAGE PARK REPORT CARD Assessing A Park s Appearance, Function, & Condition

NEIGHBOURHOOD DECISION MAKING SOUTHEAST LONDON

Programming Ideas for Parks Professionals

5.1. INTRODUCTION 5.2. INDEPENDENCE 60 WESKOPPIES

Montana Rail Link Park

February 27, 2018 City Council Presentation The Crown Jewel Park in the City of Fairfax

TWAIN HARTE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

Evaluation Summary. Years Gardening 20% 19.3% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0% 2016 (n=55) (n=254)

Lowe Park Master Plan Update Marion, IA August 25 th, 2011

Connecting Children and Families to Nature

Lesson Plan for Fire Safety Starts with You!

Welcome to the Neighborhood! COPPERLEAF NEIGHBORHOOD GUIDE

100 Dix Drive Conceptual Master Plan. Wyatt Thompson, PLA, ASLA, Assistant Director Lindsay Stucki, Intern Park Planner

I-70 Highway Cover Study MARCH 4, 2015 COMMUNITY WORKSHOP SUMMARY

Design Alternatives Workshop. Hilfiker Park Master Plan Workshop #2

South th E ast Communit ity Centre (SECC)

Neighborhood Districts

Blood Alley Square/Trounce Alley Redesign

Checklist for Working with a Landscape Architect to Get the Results You Want! By Susan Friedman

MISSISSIPPI GORGE REGIONAL PARK MASTER PLAN

LOMA VISTA ROUND 1 - COMMUNITY WORKSHOP AND OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY

PCAL Case Study Open Spaces: Blayney Heritage Park

Washington Park Diagonal

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

Reimagining Arnolds Creek. Community engagement report. May 2018

Arlington County. Courthouse Square Community Outreach Workshop. 23 April 2014

Lasley Park Design Concepts Feedback from meeting on March 3, 2016

CITY OF NAPA PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT

FACT SHEET: COMMUNITY INPUT S IMPACT ON THE DESIGN FOR THE OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CENTER

Juri Commons Design Review

Experience. the lifestyle. Entertainment. Convenient Controls. Green Living. Home Theater re. Home Automation. Energy Management

RA1.01. Project Description:

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW. Game Plan for a Healthy City

Enhancing Attawandaron Park

Long Branch-Wayne Local Park Renovation Project

RPD GEORGE CHRISTOPHER PLAYGROUND COMMUNITY MEETING 1 SEPTEMBER 24, Duncan St

CITY OF GAINESVILLE PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT VISION 2020

CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1

Public Workshop 2 December 11, 2014 OLIN

Note: This checklist is not intended as a research tool but as an aid to planning and evaluating playgrounds.

JACKsON STREET PIER CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PACKAGE SEPTEMBER 21, 2017

World Towns Agreement

Digital Photograph of Poster

CATEGORY SUB-CATEGORY COMMENT

Errol Heights Park and Community Garden Frequently Asked Questions March 22, 2018

JIANHUACHEN LA 2111L SPTIAL DESIGN LABORATARY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN PROCESS PORTFOLIO

CONSULTATION SUMMARY. Public and Online Consultation #1

Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Acting Planning and Capital Program Director

1 October Dear Citizens of Charlotte and Mecklenburg County,

Welcome. Have your say on the new ten-year vision for Manchester s Parks. Parks and open spaces consultation

The 3 Common Landscape Challenges. & How to Transform them into Features

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

APPENDICES DESIGNING PUBLIC SPACES - ENERGIZED PUBLIC SPACES DESIGN GUIDELINES WORKING DRAFT DECEMBER 2018 A1

Appendix A: Park Improvement Plan. Cecelia Ravine Park Improvement Plan. Summary Report. April Cecelia Ravine Park Improvement Plan

Community Garden Classroom Activity

Information Summary Redstone HOA Event October 17, 2015

Focus Groups. 8 Focus Group meetings including 2 with staff, 1 with seniors, and 1 with students

City Council Update October 24, 2017

Consultation Outcomes 2013

Designing the City for Play

Design for Healing Spaces - Therapeutic Gardens by Daniel Winterbottom & Amy Wagenfield (Timber Press 2015)

Planning Board Briefing

PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM

4 Park Planning and Design

Elegant Outdoor Living LANDSCAPE PERGOLAS

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

Designing Open Spaces for Recreation

Tucker Road A New Ice Rink Community Meeting 25 October 2018

Bear Creek Greenway. Volunteer Program

10.0 Open Space and Public Realm

2.5.2 Design Study - Outdoor 0.0 Play Heading Spaces

REMODELING SUCCESS BY DFW IMPROVED

WARM SPRINGS PARK MASTER PLAN

Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works Karen Ginsberg, Director of Community and Cultural Services

Inner Courtyards as Public Open Spaces

Community Garden Application Packet for School Based Gardens

Community Meeting #2. Cabrillo Playground Renovation A 2008 Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Bond Project

Welcome! HORSESHOE BAY PARK. Welcome!

Engagement Summary Gastown Streets: Local Business Visioning Workshop

Cover Planning. January I-70 East Final Environmental Impact Statement

April 11, 2016 Park Board Chair and Commissioners General Manager Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation New Brighton Salt Marsh - Preferred Concept

Topham Mall, Bentham, Pitt and Waymouth Street Place Plan

Facts. Brookgreen Gardens

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Transcription:

FAIRFAX NEIGHBORHOOD PARK Community Meeting #1 Meeting Minutes Date: February 22 nd, 2018 Location: Stedman Elementary School These meeting minutes summarize the community meeting held on February 22 nd, 2018 with the Greater Park Hill community. Welcome and Introductions Happy Haynes welcomed the community on behalf of Denver Parks and Recreation (DPR) and reiterated the purpose of this process. Appreciation for the time and effort the community dedicated to facilitating previous discussions was expressed. It was reiterated that DPR understands the importance of working closely with the community to ensure that this park reflects the neighborhood character and community desires. Community members were asked to share questions and concerns and are summarized below. Q. The community is concerned about transparency and a lack of trust between neighbors and the city regarding the park and land swap. A. There is currently no deal regarding a land swap. There is a proposal. DPR should have started this process as they are now. A main goal of this process is to build neighborhood trust and identify community desires for this park. Q. What does it mean there is no deal? A. Land has been purchased from Xcel. There was an offer made by the developer to accelerate the park design/construction process by including the park as part of the development. The impetus for conversations with the developer was a lack of secured funding for DPR to design and build the park in the immediate future. DPR acknowledges that it was an error to co-develop a concept for the park with the developer without initiating a public process. Q. How quickly would DPR be able to build the park without developer funds? A. The park would be placed on DPR s list of capital improvement projects. Projects typically remain as a request on the list for several years until funding is secured. It is anticipated to take 2-4 years to secure funding. 2.22.18 Community Meeting #1 Minutes

Q. There is concern among long-time residents that this park is primarily for people who will reside in the new development. Will the park be open to the public? Will there be an entry system restricting access? A. This will be a public park accessible to all. DPR has no private parks. When the park is established (fully constructed and warranty periods have concluded), it will be designated as a park. This designation ensures it is protected as a park and open to the public. Q. The community initiated a park visioning/design process in the fall. What will happen to this work/feedback received? A. DPR appreciates the feedback gathered by the community-led process and has the report summarizing the process and findings. DPR is not starting this process from scratch and this work will be incorporated into the DPR-led public process. Q. Does DPR support the land swap? A. At this point, DPR has no recommendation. This community process must be completed before DPR will make a recommendation regarding the proposed swap. Park Experience/Programming Activity Steve Charbonneau described the intent of the meeting was to identify the types of experiences the community desires and the park should offer. The following describes the format for the break-out discussion: Community-led Discussion Divide into small groups (preferably with other community members who are new to you!). Introduce yourself. Share a favorite park memory. - Why does this experience stand out? - How did the park contribute to this memory? Was it the stuff to do at the park, the gathering space, etc.? - Record 2-3 key points on each person s memory. What experience should this park provide the Park Hill neighborhood? Describe in terms of experience, not elements. - Record experiences. Community reports back to the group In 1 minute, highlight key experiences members of your small group talked about and what made them stand out. 2.22.18 Community Meeting #1 Minutes

Representatives from each group shared the following favorite park memories: As a child: - Experiencing the thrill of swings and slides - Visiting to Curtis Park pool and the creamery - Feeling a sense of freedom independence to visit the park without adult supervision - Gathering and playing with friends outside of home - Making ill-advised decisions (freedom with safety) - Enjoying unstructured play - Explorating - Sledding - Connecting/playing in water - Fishing As an adult: - Walking in parks as exercise - Enjoying the trees and open space in the city - Celebrating child s first birthday neighbors joined in regardless of invitations, more fluid/sense of community - Retreating to a place for mom and dad to get a break/decompress As a child and adult: - Playing sports - Attending festivals - Throwing frisbees - Enjoying family time What experience should this park provide the Park Hill neighborhood? Describe in in terms of experience, not elements. Connecting with nature Enjoying the outdoors/open space Sitting and contemplating Sitting and reading (shaded spots to view play and other areas) Appreciating flowers, trees, butterflies, bees and birds Finding respite Eating/drinking (and sharing!) Climbing, swinging and playing Enjoying Inclusivity Connecting with neighbors and attending events (e.g., movie night) Gathering and interacting with neighbors (gathering space or elements that encourage park users to speak/work together) Retreating to a safe place (eyes on the street) Connecting to neighbors 2.22.18 Community Meeting #1 Minutes

Meeting participants also identified the following desires: The park should be welcoming and inclusive. This could be cultivated though signs, park name, design, and programming. The park could be designed so it engages the street and reaches out to passing community members. The neighborhood history could be incorporated into the park through signs, design and name. Safety is important. Park could be designed to cultivate interactions between users and create a place where kids and parents can be together. Interactive play equipment where parents gather (swings, slides, etc.). Elements that spark conversation or encourage park users to interact/work with each other (climbing feature, zipline, etc.). Park could offer multigenerational experiences. Park could feature water the sound of water is calming and mud and water attract kids/creates opportunities for unstructured play. The park design can ensure the community aspect by: - Featuring messaging around the edges of the park that highlight the community - Providing space to host events - Acknowledging the neighborhood history in picture or text - Providing ongoing, living history of our changing community - Creating a sense of pride - Featuring a thematic design that highlights history and inclusivity - Naming the park to reflect the community/park intent Park Concerns and Aspiration Boards Meeting participants were provided with post-it notes to record concerns and aspirations throughout the meeting. At the end of the meeting, participants posted these concerns and aspirations on the wall. What are your great concerns for the park? Safety, community access, public agreement Folks will visit liquor store and head straight for park benches. There is a liquor store on the block, so I am somewhat concerned about people drinking and disturbing others. Park feels separate: from the rest of the block and becomes dirty with litter, graffiti, etc. Consider the fact that the community has already gone through this process once already, it would save a lot of time if the plan that was developed from those meetings was presented to the group. Especially considering the fact that 2.22.18 Community Meeting #1 Minutes

the majority of the attendees here tonight were the same attendees of the previous meetings. Drugs. The Park Hill neighborhood doesn t need another sore point to divide us. That it won t meet the aspirations of the community. Greater Park Hill Board voted down this development and the pocket park. That a small, vocal group will force their plan, it will be adopted and not reflect the majority of the neighborhood. That the land swap won t happen, and we will be left without a park because GPHC won t be able to raise necessary funds. Why wasn t this a bond request? Why not have both green space by developer and park at transfer station. That there will be no park or we will have to wait 2-4 years for DPR to have budget. The suggestion to build an 8 ft (or any size) wall. No wall. We need visibility. Not big enough. That City Council will assume GPHC speaks for nearby residents when NO polling was done. Many support the land swap for fast, economical build out! Economically disadvantaged people will feel unwelcome. We want a park not a plaza. Delay of park construction. A giant wall along the alley (we live right behind and want a good-looking boundary marker). Regarding the land swap, I am concerned that the desires of neighbors will not be represented by the GPHC vote or by other who represent us. What is your aspiration for the park? Play structure and shade (I support GPH s designs). Monkey bars (because most parks don t have them) and basketball court. Swinging and running in the grass. Park is well lit at night and does not have a lot of hidden corners or structures. A truly unique urban oasis to create a safe, multi-generational experience. An inclusive welcoming place to gather and have community events (and trees). Honor rich neighborhood history. Use Matt s design. Safety, public agreement for how the park is designed. Public acceptance for the park. A tree to read under. Neighbors meeting one another. A place to relax, sit in the shade, etc. A place my 10-year-old can go on his own and place my husband and I can go to. 2.22.18 Community Meeting #1 Minutes

Open space. Safety, visibility, nature, gathering place, inclusive. Welcome to all. Park serves the entire community regardless of age, economic status, ethnicity, etc. Use the community input that s already been done. That we will take the developer up on his offer to develop and maintain the park, as long as he is serious about it. And I think that means that means the east side of the block which I support because of his offer. That it feels welcoming to everyone nearby and not just a courtyard. That it will be kept clean and free of liquor bottles that can sometimes litter the block this will help it feel more welcoming. Lighting for safety. Open space for free play. Shade, trees, landscaping. Multi-generational use. Movies. Lots of trees with tables to sit. The park to have a distinct feature and identity. The park to be on the eastside of Fairfax. Community movies and events. The park honors and shares the diverse history of the neighborhood. Open park to the east No wall. The alley has been a place for crime to take place. We are open to having the developer build, maintain and provide safety as planned. We are open to the design of the developer with new items identified from these meetings. Inclusion. Park provides greenspace (lawn) and trees (shade and comfort!). Restful, shady, reading spot. Open space comfortable seating. Implementation to occur sooner rather than later. A gathering space. Honor nature. A multi-generational space. Honor the small scale of kids make believe. 2.22.18 Community Meeting #1 Minutes