Existing Conditions Summary (Draft for Review)

Similar documents
WEST OAKLAND SPECIFIC PLAN & DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

IMPLEMENTING SOMERSET COUNTY S INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

EXHIBIT A. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Town Center) First Amended Project Plan 1

Access to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Hospitals, and Chapel Hill Transit.

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

CHAPTER 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

ROBBINSDALE LRT STATION CDI DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

LAND USE OVERVIEW WHAT YOU WILL FIND IN THIS CHAPTER

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

CITY OF WAUKEGAN MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN GUIDELINES

LAND USE MEADOWS PLANNING AREA

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

Institutional Overlay Zone (IOZ) Regulatory Framework

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

City of Meriden Harbor Brook Flood Control Project Overview

S C O P E O F W O R K A P R I L

To ensure that resources will be available to provide a consistent level of public services to the community.

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

STAFF SUMMARY FOR S17-02 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

NASSAU COUNTY TOWN HALL NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES. A Unique Bi-State Partnership to Improve Jobs, Housing and Transportation

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Appendix E Section 4(f) Evaluation

Windsor Locks Transit-Oriented Development Planning Grant Request. Project Background

BUDGETING FOR OUTCOMES TRINITY RIVER CORRIDOR

Municipal Comprehensive and Open Space Plans

3.5 Historic Old Town Character Area

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

Vision & Land Use. Discussion. Historic Preservation Plan. Foggy Bottom Campus Plan:

NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN ELEMENT

Illustration of Eastlake Farmer s Cooperative Grain Elevator. Chapter 5: implementation 5-1

Equitable Growth Through TOD Planning

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 18, 2016

Designation Information

Prince George s County Economic Development Corporation David Iannucci President & CEO

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Staff Report and Recommendation

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

SECTION UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION Part 1 Ordinance. ARTICLE 1 Zoning Districts

Dignowity Hill Neighborhood Plan & Eastside Reinvestment Plan

LAND USE TANGLEWILDE/THOMPSON PLACE PLANNING AREA. C. Identified Neighborhood Groups and Homeowner s Associations

Draft TISCORNIA ESTATE SPECIFIC PLAN/EIR

KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION

MAIN STREET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

City of Chickasaw Land Use Comprehensive Plan 2030 Chapter5-Draft(2)Public review_

Atlanta BeltLine. Subareas 9 & 10. Master Plan Updates. March 26, Washington Park Jamboree 1

WATERFORD Plan of Preservation, Conservation and Development Supplement Part 1 - Policy Element

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan

Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center

Development Solicitation Request for Qualifications. The Historic Hollering Place Development

Eastlake Subarea plan land use comparison

SOUTHEND REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

2136 & 2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Region of Halton

CRYSTAL CITY BLOCK PLAN # CCBP- G 1 DRAFT

CONTENTS 8.0 LAND USE 8.1 GENERAL LAND USE 8.2 RESIDENTIAL 8.3 MIXED USE 8.4 COMMERCIAL 8.5 EMPLOYMENT LANDS

SUMMERSIDE / MT. CARMEL REINVESTMENT CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Chapter 9. Historic Preservation Element

The University District envisions, in its neighborhood

City of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004

Land Use. Hardware Street Vendor Mixed-Use

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

Robbinsdale LRT Station. CDI Development Guidelines. August Overview

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Making Transit Oriented Development Work For Boonton, NJ

The transportation system in a community is an

PLANNING COMMISSION. Agenda Item # 1.

Kensington Center. Public Meeting # Transit-Oriented Development, Town of Berlin, CT

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION

and services The protection and conservation of environmentally significant and sensitive natural heritage features and functions.

In surveys, Dallas residents say what they want to change most

Northwest commuter rail station US 36 BRT. Westminster Station

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

Employment and Commercial Review Analysis of Policy Directions

General Location Annex, Rezone & Preliminary Plat Lansdowne Addition, Unit Three

D-O LRT Zoning Discussion. Chapel Hill Boards & Commissions October 16, 2017

178 Carruthers Properties Inc.

APPENDIX D: BACKGROUND AND VISION

Section 9 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

NACCED/NACo CONFERENCE JULY 10, 2015

2.0 AREA PLANS. Lakeside Business District. Lakeside Business District Land Use Categories:

POLICY AMENDMENT AND LAND USE AMENDMENT TUXEDO PARK (WARD 9) CENTRE STREET N AND 26 AVENUE NE BYLAWS 36P2017 AND 234D2017

ATTACHMENT A. Town of Lebanon Village Center Study Proposal Cover Sheet (to be included with Proposal) Contract shall not exceed $48,500.

NORTH CIRCULAR ROAD - REGENERATION IN ACTION

M E M O R A N D U M SITE DATA

Transcription:

Existing Conditions Summary (Draft for Review) Prepared by March 16, 2015 Bird s-eye-view of Norwalk in 1899 (Cropped)

Existing Conditions Summary (Draft for Review) March 16, 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction Page 1 2. Planning Area Page 2 Existing Land Use 3. Historic Resources and Preservation Page 4 Historic Building Inventory 4. Redevelopment Conditions Page 11 Parcel Structure Ownership and Occupancy Patterns Building Conditions Assessment of Redevelopment Conditions 5. Regulatory Conditions Page 15 Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning Regulatory Findings and Recommendations 6. Appendix Page 19

INTRODUCTION This report contains a summary and assessment of the existing conditions in the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue neighborhood of South Norwalk. This analysis has been prepared as part of a comprehensive study to preserve the historic character of the district and enhance its overall quality of living. The resulting plan will be based on the assessment of historic resources and their characteristics which could qualify them for National Register District nomination. The main goals of this study are as follows: historic preservation and community planning, support and incentives for renovation and adaptive reuse, enhancement of the quality and value of living in the neighborhood, and coordination of plans for the neighborhood with other ongoing planning and development initiatives in the vicinity. This assessment and historic preservation strategy is being funded through a grant from the Connecticut Trust for Historic Preservation as part of their Vibrant Communities Initiative. This study is being prepared by for the Norwalk Redevelopment Agency, with Heritage Resources as the historic consultant. Figure 1. Bird s-eye-view of Norwalk in 1899 (Cropped). The Whistleville / Lexington Avenue neighborhood is visible on the lower left portion of the image. Existing Conditions Summary Page 1

PLANNING AREA Figure 2. Whistleville / Lexington Avenue Planning Area Boundaries The planning area is centered on Lexington Avenue and generally bounded by Mulvoy Street on the north; a former rail alignment, Hemlock Place and Oxford Street on the east; Meadow Street Extension and Tito Court on the south; and Dr. Martin Luther King Drive and the Amtrak rail alignment on the west. Existing Conditions Summary Page 2

Existing Land Use Figure 3. Existing Land Use Land use in the planning area is largely residential, with commercial / residential mixeduse buildings grouped along the northern portion of Ely Avenue and several church properties located along Lexington Avenue and the southern portion of Ely Avenue. Existing Conditions Summary Page 3

HISTORIC RESOURCES AND PRESERVATION This section contains a preliminary inventory and summary of existing historic buildings in the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue planning area. This preliminary inventory is focused on the assessment of the buildings architectural design elements and qualities that contribute to the distinctive historic character of the neighborhood, based on an analysis of building types and year of construction. The main source of information for this analysis is the data from the City of Norwalk Assessor s Office as recorded in its Geographic Information System (GIS) database. A comprehensive analysis and inventory of the individual building characteristics that would qualify them to support historic district designation is currently in progress, and will be submitted under separate cover as part of the documentation to support a National Register District nomination. Each building considered for inclusion in the National Register and its physical condition will be recorded on a typical form supplied by the Connecticut State Historic Preservation Office (see Appendix on page 19). Historic Building Inventory There are 270 built properties within the planning area according to GIS, of which 246 were built before 1965. For the purposes of historic analysis, buildings constructed before 1965 are considered as candidates for historic designation or as buildings that may contribute to the historic character of the district, and they are herein referred to as historic. Figure 4 (on page 5) identifies historic buildings in the planning area by year built. As the map shows, the majority of the buildings in Whistleville / Lexington Avenue were constructed between 1880 and 1920, following two significant periods of development and construction. The first period took place after the Civil War, when Lexington Avenue first appears recorded on maps under the name Lockwood Avenue (shown on Figure 1, page 1). The second period of significant development and construction coincides with the arrival of large numbers of European immigrants to South Norwalk and the development of industrial mills in the vicinity of the rail station. Existing Conditions Summary Page 4

Figure 4. Buildings Constructed before 1965 By Year Built Most of historic buildings in the planning area are residential in use and design character (226 buildings) ranging from single family homes to multi-family buildings (5-8 unit apartments). Table 1 (on page 6) summarizes the existing buildings by type, breaking down residential buildings by the number of units and providing information on representative properties. Existing Conditions Summary Page 5

Table 1. Summary of Building Types (1965 and Older) Bldg Type Number of Bldgs Year Built Representative Address Notes Single Family 64 1890-1963 5-9 Kossuth, 13 Lexington, 5 Lubrano, 6 Lubrano, 2-4 Olean, 7 Snowden Bungalow/ Cape Cod/ Colonial / Conventional in GIS 2 Family 117 1850-1963 9 Hemlock, 3 Laura, 6 Laura, 14 Lexington, 30 Lexington, 32 Lexington, 117 Lexington, 125 Lexington 3 Family 32 1855-1947 4 Laura, 25 Lexington, 70 Lexington, 127 Lexington, 6 Mulvoy Colonial / Conventional/ Family Duplex in GIS Colonial / Conventional in GIS 4 Family 8 1885-1923 24 Laura, 69 Lexington Colonial / Conventional in GIS 5-8 Unit Apt 5 1890-1959 15 Kossuth, 18 Laura Commercial/Apt 9 1870-1940 25 Ely, 45 Ely, 35 Lexington, 39 Lexington Church 4 1900-1923 19 Lexington, 50 Lexington, 4 Tito Off/Ret/Apt/ Commercial in GIS Calvin Reformed Church, Faith Lighthouse Church, New Jerusalem Missionary Baptist Church Church/ Community 3 1940-1954 22 Lexington, 25 Kossuth, 218 Ely New Light Missionary Baptist Church, Gethsemane Outreach Ministries, Macedonia Church Club/Lodge 1 1937 92-94 Lexington William Moore Lodge - 1533 Light Industrial 1 1921 7 Lexington Service Shop/ Garage 2 1924-1955 109 Lexington, 245 Ely Service Shop/ Outbuilding in GIS Existing Conditions Summary Page 6

Table 1 indicates that the majority of buildings in the planning area are distributed among three predominant building types: 2-family homes (117 buildings), single family homes (64 buildings) and 3-family homes (32 buildings). Altogether, these building types account for 86% of the historic buildings and 79% of all the buildings in the planning area. These facts are mapped on Figure 5 below. Photographs of representative buildings are presented in Table 2 (on pages 8 to 10). Figure 5. Location of Historic Residential Buildings by Type (Built Prior to 1965) Existing Conditions Summary Page 7

Table 2. Photographs of Representative Historic Building Types 7 Kossuth Street [Single Family] 5 Lubrano Place [Single Family] 13 Lexington Avenue [Single Family] 14 Lexington Avenue [2-Family] 30 Lexington Avenue [2-Family] 9 Hemlock Place [2-Family] 4 Laura Avenue [3-Family] 127 Lexington Avenue [3-Family] Existing Conditions Summary Page 8

Table 2. Photographs of Representative Historic Building Types (continued) 24 Laura Avenue [4-Family] 69 Lexington Avenue [4-Family] 18 Laura Avenue [5-8 Unit Apt] 15 Kossuth Street [5-8 Unit Apt] 39 Lexington Avenue [Commercial/Apt] 25 Ely Avenue [Commercial/Apt] 45 Ely Avenue [Commercial/Apt] 59-65 Ely Avenue [Commercial/Apt] Existing Conditions Summary Page 9

Table 2. Photographs of Representative Historic Building Types (continued) 19 Lexington Avenue [Church] 50 Lexington Avenue [Church] 22 Lexington Ave. [Church/Community] 25 Kossuth Street [Church/Community] 92-94 Lexington Avenue [Club/Lodge] 92-94 Lexington Avenue [Club/Lodge] 7 Lexington Avenue [Light Industrial] 7 Lexington Avenue [Light Industrial] Existing Conditions Summary Page 10

REDEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS Parcel Structure Figure 6. Parcel Distribution by Size Parcels in the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue neighborhood are generally small in area; most of them are less than 0.27 acres (18,000 square feet). This is consistent with the predominant residential land use of 2-family and single-family homes. Existing Conditions Summary Page 11

Only 22 parcels are larger than 0.27 acres and only 6 parcels are larger than 0.5 acres or 22,000 square feet, with the largest parcel measuring 1.76 acres (76, 665 square feet). Ownership and Occupancy Patterns A review of the assessor s data for the planning area indicates that approximately 51 % of the existing properties (including condominium units) are owner-occupied. This estimate has been obtained by comparing tax billing addresses and street addresses, and assuming that buildings where both addresses are the same are owner-occupied. Restricting the comparison and analysis to those buildings that could qualify for historic designation (those constructed prior to 1965) indicates that 123 out of 270 buildings are owner-occupied. This represents 45% of the historic buildings. Of the historic buildings occupied by owners, approximately half of them are 2-family homes (60 buildings) while one-third are single-family homes (37 buildings). This may be an important consideration at the time of outlining strategies to encourage and promote the preservation of historic resources. Property owners of large parcels include businesses and religious institutions. A few businesses own clusters of adjacent parcels that often share a common access, with a similar land use. Table 3 summarizes parcels larger than 0.5 acres and clusters of adjacent parcels that share use and ownership. Table 3. Large Parcels and Clusters of Parcels with Shared Use and Ownership Street Address / Addresses Total Use Acreage 10 Lubrano Pl / 12 Lubrano Pl / 26 Hemlock Pl / 7 Olean St / 9 Olean 2.03 Commercial / Light Industrial / Warehouse St / 13 Olean St 15 / Olean St 19 Lexington Ave 1.76 Church, ancillary building, parking 111 Lexington Ave / 1.11 Apt [5-8 Unit] / Commercial 117 Lexington Ave/ 119 Lexington Ave / 18 Knapp St / 24 Knapp St 215 Martin Luther King Bvd 1 Vacant 97 Lexington 0.96 Apt [5-8 Unit] / Commercial 218 Ely Ave 0.7 Church Historic Land / Single-family 8 Mulvoy St 0.7 Commercial / Nurseries Existing Conditions Summary Page 12

Building Conditions Figure 7. Building Conditions per Assessor s Data Figure 7 represents existing building conditions as recorded by the City s assessor s data base. This will be complemented by a more detailed assessment on a building-bybuilding basis, which is currently underway as part of the Historic Resources Inventory required for National Register District nomination. Existing Conditions Summary Page 13

Assessment of Redevelopment Conditions Figure 7 above indicates that the majority of the buildings are in Average or Good condition (49% and 31% of total historic buildings respectively). However, it is noticeable that many buildings are in need of exterior repairs. There also are buildings that have been altered or expanded through the years without necessarily maintaining the original design qualities that would correspond to their historic character. These particular building conditions will be recorded in detail as part of the Historic Resources Inventory. The need for exterior repairs, however, would not be conducive to a significant redevelopment of the majority of small residential properties unless they could be assembled into larger parcels that could support larger buildings. A review of ownership patterns indicates that only 30 property owners in the planning area own more than one parcel, and of those, only 7 owners are registered as owning 2 adjacent parcels or more. Parcels that individually or as a result being adjacent to each other and having the same owner are larger than 0.27 acres (18,000 square feet) will be analyzed in more detail as part of the next phase of the study, in order to estimate their likely redevelopment potential and identify strategies that will promote historic preservation. Crime Statistics Crime statistics for the year 2014 indicate that there were 212 incidents reported in the planning area. Of these, 162 incidents were on Ely Avenue (76% of the total), 38 on Lexington Avenue (18%) and 12 on Mulvoy Street/Henry Street Extension (5%). There were no incidents reported on other streets. Most of these incidents were recorded as assault, destruction of property/vandalism, or trespass of real property. Although these incidents have little or no relation to the historic character of the neighborhood, they may have a negative impact on the overall quality of living in the community. These conditions may provide a basis for the consideration of community development and revitalization strategies aimed at improving the image and public safety of the affected locations. Existing Conditions Summary Page 14

REGULATORY CONDITIONS The Building Zone Regulations for the City of Norwalk apply to the planning area. Existing Zoning There are currently five zones in the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue planning area, distributed as shown in Figure 8 (see next page). C Residence (C) D Residence (D) Industrial No. 1 (I1) Neighborhood Business (NB) Restricted Industrial (RI) C Residence (C) This zone provides areas for single-family dwellings on lots with an area of 5,000 square feet or more and two-family dwellings on lots with an area of 6,000 square feet or more, and other compatible uses. Certain other uses consistent with the allowed density may be permitted by Special Permit. It is intended that all uses be harmonious with local street characteristics and the limitation of available utilities and other public services. D Residence (D) This zone provides areas for multifamily dwellings (less than 12 units), as well as singleand two-family dwellings and other compatible uses. Certain other uses consistent with the allowed density may be permitted by Special Permit. It is intended that all uses be harmonious with local street characteristics and the limitation of available utilities and other public services. Neighborhood Business (NB) This zone permits a diversity of uses which serve neighborhood retail and service needs at a scale appropriate to the residential areas which surround it. The intent of this zone is to encourage mixed-use development in neighborhood commercial areas. The provisions of this zone are designed to ensure that all permitted uses and structures will be compatible with each other and will provide protection to adjacent residential areas. Multifamily dwellings, retail, office, banks, restaurants, and boutique manufacturing are all permitted. Existing Conditions Summary Page 15

Figure 8. Existing Zoning Existing Conditions Summary Page 16

Industrial No. 1 (I1) This zone provides areas for manufacturing and related uses - warehouse, office, retail and single- and two-family housing. Heavy industrial uses are allowed by Special Permit. The district is intended to provide low-scale industrial facilities interspersed with other uses and with the utilities and infrastructure necessary to support such industrial operations. Provisions of this zone recognize the need for manufacturing space while setting standards for compatibility with residential areas. This zone allows all uses permitted in the C Residence Zone, as well as multifamily buildings, and a large variety of light industrial and manufacturing uses. Restricted Industrial (RI) This zone provides areas exclusively for light industrial manufacturing uses and other compatible uses, including single- and multi-family residential uses with recreational facilities, on a parcel containing 25 acres or more, as well as limited areas of artist workspace, non-accessory office, college or university use, which will contribute to the economic base of the city and which will constitute a harmonious and appropriate part of the physical development of the city. Proposed Zoning New zoning recommendations have been proposed for areas of South Norwalk located within easy walking distance of the South Norwalk Metro-North Railroad Station. These recommendations are aimed at directing and supporting improvements and developments within walking distance of the rail station and strengthening the walkability of the district. Design guidelines for the design and development aspects associated with transit oriented development are also being proposed as part of the South Norwalk TOD Redevelopment Plan. At least part of the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue planning area is within the proposed TOD Zoning Area. As the historic preservation strategies for Whistleville are defined and developed into their own set of historic preservation standards and guidelines, the compatibility between the proposed TOD zoning as it applies to the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue planning area needs to be carefully assessed and evaluated. Existing Conditions Summary Page 17

Regulatory Findings and Recommendations The existing C Residence and D Residence zones are compatible with the existing land use, building types and urban design character of the areas to which they apply. The same cannot be said for the Neighborhood Business (NB) and Industrial No.1 (I1) zones, however. Although these zones allow for the presence of single family, 2-family, 3-family and 4-family buildings, they are intended to promote the development of multifamily residential, mixed-use and commercial buildings, which runs contrary to the goal of preserving the historic character of the neighborhood at many locations. The development pressures and opportunities for redevelopment that the NB and I1 zones could promote could be devastating to the urban design and historic character of the properties located along Lexington Avenue, and in particular to the prevalent Single Family and 2-Family homes that constitute the most characteristic building type in the planning area. Historic preservation strategies for the Whistleville / Lexington Avenue planning area need to include zoning recommendations that address these vulnerabilities. This could be achieved by either proposing direct changes to the current zoning or outlining an overlay zoning district, including specific design standards and guidelines aimed at protecting buildings that contribute to the historic character of the neighborhood from demolition or substantial change. Existing Conditions Summary Page 18

APPENDIX Figure A-1. Historic Resources Inventory Form, page 1 Existing Conditions Summary Page 19

Figure A-2. Historic Resources Inventory Form, page 2 Existing Conditions Summary Page 20