Rezoning Issues Setting a Foundation for Zoning Decisions

Similar documents
Transportation Land Use Integration & Regional Planning. Don Kostelec, AICP Senior Planner, Louis Berger Group February 1, 2010

Land Use Policy & Development Ordinance Update

Planning Charlotte s Future. Transportation & Planning Committee March 14, 2016

A BLUEPRINT FOR BROCKTON A CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee May 17, 2016

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

SAN RAFAEL GENERAL PLAN 2040 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

ITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.

Executive Summary. NY 7 / NY 2 Corridor

Implementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen

Planning Charlotte s Future. Planning Committee June 21, 2016

Blueprint Denver A BLUEPRINT FOR AN INCLUSIVE CITY. Executive Summary

Welcome to the Oakridge Centre Open House

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

TOD 101 CREATING LIVABLE COMMUNITIES WITH TRANSIT

Independence Boulevard Area Plan Planning Committee Public Comment May 18, 2010

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview March 10, 2011

2040 LUP is a part of the Comprehensive Plan and carries the same legal authority. Economic Challenges

Corridor-Level Approaches to Creating Transit-Oriented Districts

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

Preliminary Plan Framework: Vision and Goals

Public Open House. Overview of the Downtown Plan Official Plan Amendment April 23, 2018

PSRC REVIEW REPORT & CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION

Plano Tomorrow Vision and Policies

TENNESSEE STATE ROUTE 109 CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT ALONG STATE ROUTE 109

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

Introduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1

Table A-4...Professional and Do-It-Yourself Improvement Expenditures by Homeowner Characteristics: 2007

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

JANUARY 19, 2011 CENTRAL AVENUE-METRO BLUE LINE TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT COMMUNITY FORUM

Roosevelt Corridor. R e i n v e s t m e n t P l a n. Public Meeting Gilbert Elementary School May 12, :00 pm

Urban Planning and Land Use

TOD IMPLEMENTATION BEST PRACTICE TOOLBOX Leveraging Transit for City Shaping

40 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Partnerships in Transportation Transit-oriented Development The Return on Investment

Chapter 2: Vision, Goals and Strategies

Comprehensive Plan. Faribault, Minnesota. Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Claybaugh Preservation Architecture Inc. Howard R. Green Company Bonz/REA

Cobb County Design Guidelines Mableton Parkway & Veterans Memorial Highway Community Design Workshop January 12, 2017

DRAFT PLAN PRESENTATION

Economic Development & Housing Council Committee Comprehensive Plan Update September 20, 2005

Official Plan Review

SUMMERSIDE / MT. CARMEL REINVESTMENT CORRIDOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY

Table W-4...Total Improvement Expenditures by Homeowner Characteristics:

KEY FINDINGS. Community Engagement + Research

CITY CLERK. Parkland Acquisition Strategic Directions Report (All Wards)

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

DRAFT Amsterdam/Churchill Community Plan (4/17/08) Adopted By the Gallatin County Commission

Route 1 Corridor Study

Living in Albemarle County s Urban Places

City of Nogales General Plan

Remi Mendoza City Planning Academy March 13, 2017

India Basin/Hunters Point Shoreline Community Workshop May 21, 2008

Table A-4...Professional and Do-It-Yourself Improvement Expenditures by Homeowner Characteristics: 2013

Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. June 24, 2008

Silverdale Regional Center

Broken Arrow Comprehensive Plan Update Public Workshop Meeting #3 January 23,

Date: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

Corridor Vision. 1Pursue Minnehaha-Hiawatha Community Works Project. Mission of Hennepin County Community Works Program

V. Vision and Guiding Principles

2030 Comprehensive Plan VISION STATEMENT

It Takes A Village.. Preserving Rural Character In Standish

CITY OF SACRAMENTO GENERAL PLAN. UC Davis ESP 171 Urban and Regional Planning April 21, 2011

3. ELEMENTS OF THE METRO VISION 2035 PLAN

Steering Committee Meeting

Ranking US Cities Oil Addiction: Sprawl and Car Commuting Emerge as Real Estate Risk Factors

Public Forum. Kelley s Corner: The Corner that Connects Us. The Cecil Group. March 7, Acton 2020 Town of Acton.

City of Fort Lauderdale UPTOWN URBAN VILLAGE. Public Workshop December 7, 2016

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis September 17, 2018

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

COLLABORATION BETWEEN CITY, COUNTY, UNIVERSITY AND PROPERTY OWNERS

Cumberland Region Tomorrow is a private, non-profit, citizen based regional organization working with Greater Nashville Regional Council

Blueprint Denver Task Force Meeting #

1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1

THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR WALKABLE COMMUNITIES. Community Technical Assistance Program Building Active Communities Institute March 2016

Community Open House March 26 th, 2018

Concord Community Reuse Project Goals and Guiding Principles. Overarching Goals (OG)

Port Lavaca Future Land Use

Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project. Onondaga County Planning Federation June 7, Onondaga County Sustainable Streets Project 1

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Parks, Trails, and Open space Element

Unique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors

Burton Station Village Community Meeting February 26, 2014

Streets for People, Place-Making and Prosperity. #TOcompletestreets

Good Neighbor Plan Dallas Love Field Airport Transportation and Environment Committee

INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD AREA PLAN. Economic Development Committee Overview May 25, 2010

Draft Bergamot Area Plan

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.

Welcome. Walk Around. Talk to Us. Write Down Your Comments

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

North Fair Oaks Community Plan Summary and Information

DRAFT MAP AMENDMENT FLU 04-4

Transcription:

Rezoning Issues Setting a Foundation for Zoning Decisions City Council Workshop May 2, 2016

Agenda Goal Need actionable items and sequence of steps Foundation for Zoning Decisions Council Workshop Discussion (April 4 th ) Topic Focus: Zoning & Transportation Discussion & Next Steps 2

Foundation for Zoning Decisions 1. Plan Consistency 2. Character & Context 3. Community Infrastructure - Transportation - Schools - Other (water/sewer, police/fire, etc.) 4. Community Resources - Archeological - Environmental - Historical - Cultural 5. Affordable Housing 3

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Plan Consistency In considering any petition to reclassify property, the City Council shall consider the following items: (Sec. 6.111.2.a of the Zoning Ordinance) Whether the proposed reclassification is consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the adopted "Generalized Land Plan" and any amendment to that plan through an adopted district or area plan covering the subject property; 4

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Character & Context In considering any petition to reclassify property, the City Council may consider, although is not required to, the following: Whether the proposed reclassification is compatible with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; (Sec. 6.111.3 of the Zoning Ordinance) 5

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Community Infrastructure In considering any petition to reclassify property, the City Council may consider, although is not required to, the following: (Sec. 6.111.3 of the Zoning Ordinance) The adequacy of public facilities and services intended to serve the subject property, including but not limited to roadways parks and recreational facilities police and fire protection schools stormwater drainage systems water supplies, and wastewater treatment garbage services 6

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Community Resources In considering any petition to reclassify property, the City Council may consider, although is not required to, the following: (Sec. 6.111.3 of the Zoning Ordinance) Whether the proposed reclassification will adversely affect a known archaeological environmental historical or cultural resource 7

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Affordable Housing In considering any petition to reclassify property, the City Council shall not: (Sec. 6.111.4 of the Zoning Ordinance) Discriminate against affordable housing units for families or individuals with incomes below eighty percent (80%) of area median income. Reclassification of property by the City Council based on considerations of limiting high concentrations of affordable housing is permissible. Per General Statute: 41A-4 & 41-A-5(a) 8

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Council Discussion Plan Consistency Council Comments (April 4 th Workshop) Where is the vision? List of issues is incremental. Focus where we want more intense development to go. Are we getting investment in all of Charlotte? Jobs where people live Reinvestment in aging neighborhoods Should be implementing plans. Events/development is outrunning the plans and tools. Area plans are outdated, but the train needs to continue to run. Can Council help prioritize areas to focus on? 9

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Council Discussion Character & Context Council Comments (April 4 th Workshop) The Big Picture - Make a place everyone is proud to live in. Are we really creating walkable places or just increasing vehicle traffic? Too many variances Are we addressing live/work/play mixed use projects, job creation. 10

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Council Discussion Community Infrastructure Council Comments (April 4 th Workshop) Break the City into segments and define capacity? Pace of growth is out-pacing our ability to serve What is the real cost of development? How do we share cost? What options do we have to mitigate the impact of growth? Need to educate the public on the cost of growth. How do we get ahead of growth? (e.g. Northlake) Need transportation options & diversity (8-80). Need transportation options in low income areas Collaboration with school system define our role and manage expectations Open Space? 11

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Council Discussion Community Resources Council Comments (April 4 th Workshop) Do no harm, ensure we protect value (preserve and increase) Historic Preservation? Environmental Stormwater is behind and underfunded 12

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Council Discussion Affordable Housing Council Comments (April 4 th Workshop) Concern over the consistency and implementation of continued case-by-case negotiation. Affordable housing vs. workforce (need to define) 13

Questions & Discussion 14

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Conditional Rezoning Foundation for Zoning Decisions Conditional Rezoning Plan Consistency Other Considerations Negotiations Area Plans Future Land Use Centers, Corridors & Wedges Growth Framework General Development Polices Character & Context Community Infrastructure Community Resources Affordable Housing Site design Scale transitions Street activation Open space Access & connectivity Transportation mitigation Architectural design Affordable housing Environmental preservation 15

Foundation for Zoning Decisions New Development Ordinance A New Unified Development Ordinance That reflects the character and vision of Charlotte as it grows Provides a clear vision of the community we want to create Easy for the community to use & understand New & refined districts that minimize the reliance on conditional rezoning Links all our development ordinances and policies together 16

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Community Character Manual Place-Based Ordinance Foundation Community Character Manual (CCM) Place-types will function as the foundation for zoning districts Place types reinforce existing quality & character and/or facilitate change where desired Place types established by the CCM will provide clear link to Zoning Map Each place type may result in multiple zoning districts 17

Questions & Discussion 18

Foundation for Zoning Decisions 1. Plan Consistency 2. Character & Context 3. Community Infrastructure - Transportation - Schools - Other (water/sewer, police/fire, etc.) 4. Community Resources - Archeological - Environmental - Historical - Cultural 5. Affordable Housing 19

Zoning & Transportation Overview Zoning & Transportation What are the Issues? Regional Growth & By-Right Development Rezoning Evaluation Key Policy Questions Role of Transportation Action Plan 20

Zoning & Transportation Issues Transportation Issues Need transportation options and diversity (8-80 Cities concept) Are we really creating walkable places or just increasing vehicle traffic? Focus where we want more intense development to go. More transportation options in low income areas (e.g. transit, shuttles, etc.) Congestion & impacts on neighborhoods Safety Incomplete sidewalks & pedestrian crossings Disconnected bicycle network 21

Zoning & Transportation Ongoing Regional Growth Rank City Population 1 New York City 8,491,000 2 Los Angeles 3,929,000 3 Chicago 2,722,000 4 Houston 2,240,000 5 Philadelphia 1,560,000 6 Phoenix 1,537,000 7 San Antonio 1,437,000 8 San Diego 1,381,000 9 Dallas 1,281,000 10 San Jose 1,016,000 11 Austin 913,000 12 Jacksonville 853,000 13 San Francisco 852,000 14 Indianapolis 849,000 15 Columbus 836,000 16 Fort Worth 812,000 17 Charlotte (2014) 810,000 18 Detroit 680,000 19 El Paso 679,000 20 Seattle 668,000 21 Denver 664,000 22 Washington 659,000 23 Memphis 657,000 24 Boston 656,000 25 Nashville 644,000 + 400,000 (44 new residents per Day) Rank City Population 1 New York City 8,491,000 2 Los Angeles 3,929,000 3 Chicago 2,722,000 4 Houston 2,240,000 5 Philadelphia 1,560,000 6 Phoenix 1,537,000 7 San Antonio 1,437,000 8 San Diego 1,381,000 9 Dallas 1,281,000 Charlotte (2040) 1,200,000 10 San Jose 1,016,000 11 Austin 913,000 12 Jacksonville 853,000 13 San Francisco 852,000 14 Indianapolis 849,000 15 Columbus 836,000 16 Fort Worth 812,000 18 Detroit 680,000 19 El Paso 679,000 20 Seattle 668,000 21 Denver 664,000 22 Washington 659,000 23 Memphis 657,000 24 Boston 656,000 25 Nashville 644,000 22

Zoning & Transportation Congestion in the Charlotte Region Population by Metropolitan Areas Charlotte (23) Charlotte is ranked 23rd nationally in population, and ranks 25 th in congestion. Congestion Index by Metropolitan Areas Charlotte (25) More people will mean more development. Most development will happen without rezoning. Travel demand will increase with or without rezoning. (Congestion rankings by Inricks) 23

Zoning & Transportation Transportation Action Plan Charlotte s comprehensive transportation plan Adopted in 2006; updated every five (5) years Includes funding plan for transportation projects to address existing and anticipated needs The plan also recognizes need for funding partnerships. The 2016 update is underway with the Transportation and Planning Committee 24

Zoning & Transportation By-Right Development Governed by development ordinances. Zoning Tree Ordinance Subdivision Post-Construction Controls No City Council involvement. Development proceeds if ordinance requirements are met. Transportation improvements are typically localized and ensure public safety and provide incremental improvements. 25

Zoning & Transportation Rezoning Evaluations How does CDOT evaluate a rezoning petition? The basics: Calculate what the expected trip generation of the site will be Conduct traffic studies to identify impacts (in some cases) Determine what transportation mitigations are needed beyond ordinance requirements Ensure consistency with related development ordinances Identify safest and most efficient locations for access Identify opportunities to achieve other transportation goals that may include pedestrian crossings, completing off-site sidewalk gaps, traffic calming, or dedication of public right-of-way for future improvements. 26

Zoning & Transportation Key Policy Questions 1) Why do we support intensification in Transportation Corridors and Activity Centers? Answer: If the growth is inevitable, the question is not how much new development should the city support; the question is where should it go? Activity Centers and Transportation Corridors offer the best chances for transportation capacity now and in the future. Adopted Policy Guidance: Centers Corridors and Wedges Growth Framework 27

Zoning & Transportation Key Policy Questions 2) Why aren t we fully mitigating the impacts of traffic? Answer: Sometimes we do. In greenfield development, new infrastructure is often created commensurate with development impacts. However, eventually the number of travel lanes and turn lanes needed to offset the impact of development creates other problems, including impacts to neighborhoods and barriers to walking, cycling, and transit access. Adopted Policy Guidance: Urban Street Design Guidelines 28

Zoning & Transportation Key Policy Questions 3) Why do we try to connect streets together if that creates cut-through traffic in neighborhoods? Answer: Many of the greatest transportation challenges Charlotte faces stem from patterns of disconnected neighborhoods and land uses. Making new street connections can help shorten vehicle trips, reduce pressure on arterial streets, and provide better options for walking and biking. Charlotte employs the use of traffic calming devices to help mitigate the effect of higher volumes and speeds. Adopted Policy Guidance: Connectivity Policy Statements (Incorporated into TAP) 29

Zoning & Transportation Key Policy Questions 4) What are we doing about the cumulative impact of each development? When do we say there is too much congestion? Answer: Charlotte does not have a policy that governs when there is too much congestion. We have focused on form and scale as being appropriate or not. Area plans provide guidance on the types and intensities of uses that are appropriate. The area plans are informed by the Centers Corridors and Wedges Growth Framework, and various transportation plans, including the Thoroughfare Plan, and the Transit System Plan. 30

Zoning & Transportation Transportation Action Plan Policies Projects 31

Questions & Discussion 32

Foundation for Zoning Decisions Questions for Council: Any issues not identified? What are your priorities? 1. Plan Consistency 2. Character & Context 3. Community Infrastructure - Transportation - Schools - Other (water/sewer, police/fire, etc.) 4. Community Resources - Archeological - Environmental - Historical - Cultural 5. Affordable Housing 33

Next Steps Goal Need actionable items and sequence of steps June Workshop Identify & prioritize concerns & issues Discussion of short & long term policy considerations 34