Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Similar documents
Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE SIGNAGE VILLAGE OF GLENVIEW

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

Attachment 3: Plan Commission Staff Report

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

D E S I G N R E V I E W B OA R D

COLERAIN TOWNSHIP ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 18, :00 p.m.

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

11 March 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BUDDHIST EDUCATION CENTER OF AMERICA DONG HUNG TEMPLE, INC. PROPERTY OWNER: MOY FAMILY, LLC

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA. ITEM NO: 6.a 6.b STAFF: LONNA THELEN

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Request Conditional Use Permit (Car Wash Facility) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

VILLAGE OF CHANNAHON COMMERCIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Village of Channahon S. Navajo Drive Channahon, IL (815)

CITY OF KEIZER MASTER PLAN APPLICATION & INFORMATION SHEET

6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CAH HOLDINGS, LLC

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

Community Development Department Council Chambers, 7:30 PM, February 18, Skokie Boulevard

City of Yorba Linda Memorandum

ZONING AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 4, 2013

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

PROJECT REVIEW GROUP REPORT. TO: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS PREPARED BY: Martha Dooley Landscape and Sustainability Planner

STAFF REPORT. April 30, 2018 May 9, 2018

D. Landscape Design. 1. Coverage Intent: To provide adequate landscaping materials that enhance the appearance of development projects.

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Statement of Intent Proposed Development Five Forks Athletics Scuffletown Rd, Greenville SC

P: Site Plan Approval

KNOXVILLE/KNOX COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION SUBDIVISION REPORT - CONCEPT/USE ON REVIEW

Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 5, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Agenda Item. Applicant Logan Virginia Properties, LLC Property Owners Byler Azalea, LLC & Gateway Free Will Baptist Chuch

County of Loudoun. Department of Planning MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: ZMOD , Dulles North Business Park Comprehensive Sign Plan, 2 nd Referral

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN. APPLICANT: Cedar Grove Hospitality, LLC HEARING DATE: December 18, 2014

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

CITY OF GARDEN CITY. Garden City Design Review Committee Staff Contact: Chris Samples STAFF REPORT: DSRFY Page 1

MEMORANDUM. Planning and Zoning Division Department of Community Development TO: FROM: DATE: July 23, SUBJECT: PLNSUB : Salt City Plaza

ARTICLE RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT

Kingfisher Planned Development (PLNSUB ) and Special Exception (PLNPCM ) Planned Development and Special Exception

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

P: Site Plan Approval

Hidden Pointe Landscape Master Plan. June, archi terra

PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

11 October 8, 2014 Public Hearing

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Urban Planning and Land Use

Design Review Commission Report

ZONING ORDINANCE FOR THE ZONED UNINCORPORATED AREAS ARTICLE 1150 OF PUTNAM COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA Page 95 ARTICLE 1150 SITE PLAN REVIEW

At Your Disposal CUP Amendment, Lot 20, Village Service Commercial, at 128 Bastille Dr. (PLN17-208)

4 September 14, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

Request Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. CS Commercial, LLC 1337 Riverside Avenue, Unit 1 Fort Collins, CO 80524

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

Architectural and Appearance Design Manual. Town of Lexington, SC 1

Urban Planning and Land Use

Deerfield Township Community Development Department

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

*/ * ELIZABETH AVE AC AC NS O-2 MUDD(O) MUDD(O) COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

PLANNING BOARD REPORT PORTLAND, MAINE

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012

Urban Planning and Land Use

Boulder County Comprehensive Drilling Plan Surface Owner Meeting. Thursday, Oct. 19, 2017

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN PLANNING COMMISSION June 24, 2015 MINUTES

Mayor Leon Skip Beeler and Members of the City Commission. Anthony Caravella, AICP, Director of Development Services

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

City Center Specific Plan Amendments And Background Report City of Richmond. PLANNING COMMISION FINAL DRAFT January, 2001

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL, REZONING & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: February 7, 2013

Article 7.05 Manufactured Home Park Districts

Chapter LANDMARKS AND HISTORIC SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICTS A.120 Enforcement A.130 Severability. Tacoma Municipal Code

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

Access. Chapel Parking & Entry Loop Snowbridge Square Skier/Visitor Parking. Dumpster Access. 3 Entry Monument Future Chapel Park

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)

Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Transcription:

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission STAFF REPORT June 6, 2012 TO: Chairman and Appearance Commissioners FROM: Planning & Economic Development Department CASE #: A2012-044 LOCATION: PROJECT NAME: 2301 Patriot Blvd & 2651 Compass Rd Anixter Annex Building CASE MANAGER: Jeff Brady, AICP, Director of Planning SUBJECT: Preliminary Appearance Approval ACTION REQUESTED: Staff requests a final determination on the proposal. APPLICANT: Anixter Real Estate, Inc. 2301 Patriot Boulevard Glenview, IL 60026 Ken Hagaman Tel: (224) 521-8385 OWNER: Aug Six, LLC 2591 Compass Road, Suite 105 Glenview, IL 60026 Tel: (847) 486-9781 PROPOSAL: The applicant, Anixter Corporation, is requesting Preliminary Appearance Approval to allow a two-story, 61,898 s.f. office building, parking lot modifications, and site improvements to connect to the existing Anixter corporate headquarters on a 3.88 acre parcel. Report Disclaimer: Village staff makes no representations regarding support, endorsement, or the likelihood of approval or disapproval by any Glenview regulatory commission or the Village Board of Trustees.

Site Assessment AERIAL: 2

PICTOMETRIC PHOTOGRAPHY: South Elevation 3

Project Summary PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Anixter Real Estate Inc., is requesting Preliminary Approval from the Appearance Commission to allow a two-story, 61,898 s.f. office building annex, parking lot modifications, and site improvements on a 3.88 acre parcel. This annex building will be linked via the parking lot and walkways to the existing Anixter corporate headquarters to the west. The new building will be two stories compared to the single story building that was originally contemplated, but never constructed, for this site as part of the previous Titan Development Company design. The smaller building foot print allows the applicant to construct additional parking, while maintaining much of the existing parking locations and drive aisles. A new loading area is being provided and the garbage enclosure is being relocated on the site. The building architecture will match the existing Anixter building architecture, materials, and color. The landscaping will match the existing Anixter lot design and include additional buffering along the berm adjacent to the residential neighborhood. New Sternberg light fixtures are being added to the existing ones on site and the proposed lighting levels are in compliance with the Village s lighting requirements. The two existing monument signs will be modified to included identification for the Anixter building. The signage for both building tenants will consist of 6-inch metal letters, with the same color and font style, which will be externally illuminated from the existing ground fixtures. The applicant is also proposing to remove ten (10) spaces on the existing Anixter lot to accommodate the drive aisle connection and walkway connections to the annex. In order to replace those spaces, twenty-two (22) spaces will be added which were originally approved, but never installed. Included on the landscape plan is a design to provide additional buffering for the adjacent residential development along these new parking stalls. BACKGROUND: Anixter International was founded in Chicago in 1957 and is now a Fortune 500 company (ranked 414 in 2011) that is the leading global supplier of communications and security products, electrical and electronic wire and cable, fasteners, and other small components. Anixter has 7,900 employees with sales offices and distribution centers in 50 countries serving over 100,000 customers. On April 16, 2002, the Village approved a $2 million TIF incentive for Anixter to relocate their corporate headquarters building from Skokie, Illinois to the Prairie Glen Corporate Campus. Subsequently, an approximate 167,000 s.f. building was constructed and occupied in 2003 and now employs approximately 670 individuals. This facility produces approximately $1 million in annual property taxes. Anixter has several other office locations in the Chicagoland region including Wood Dale and Morton Grove. On April 17, 2012 the Village Board of Trustees approved the support of property tax assistance in order for the Glenview site to be competitive with other potential locations for this expansion - in particular, Anixter s Wood Dale facility. The original Anixter development was approved in 2002 (see attached Ordinance 4392) and the original Titan Development Company design for the lot where the annex building would be located was approved in 2004 (see attached Ordinance 4614). The subject parcel was originally planned for a onestory medical/dental office building, but has been vacant since marketing of The Glen commenced in 1998. 4

On May 29, 2012 the Plan Commission recommended the Village Board grant Final Site Plan Approval for the proposed development. During the meeting the Commission had a few questions on the circulation patterns of the vehicles through the site and how many workers would be anticipated using the pedestrian connection to the building. Following the Commission comments the project was approved as submitted. There was no public in attendance at the meeting. The recommendation will be considered by the Village Board on June 19, 2012. Appearance Commission Review APPEARANCE PLAN COMMENTS: Staff comments after evaluating the proposal for compliance with the Appearance Plan: Building Design Criteria from Appearance Plan: Quality of design and relationship to surroundings Good scale and harmonious conformance with neighboring development Materials with architectural character and harmony with adjoining buildings Building components with good proportions and relationship to one another Harmonious colors Avoidance of monotony; avoidance of inappropriate, incompatible, bizarre and exotic designs Staff comments: o The petitioner shall furnish a sample board with the proposed materials and colors for the development for the file and review by the Appearance Commission. Sign Criteria from Appearance Plan: Compatibility with building architecture Compatibility with signs on adjoining buildings Harmony with surrounding landscape Good scale in relationship to surroundings Use of harmonious colors Staff comments: o The petitioner shall furnish a material sample that demonstrates the proposed letter color. Landscaping Criteria from Appearance Plan: Grades of walks, terraces and other paved areas shall provide an inviting and stable appearance for walking, and if seating is providing, for sitting. Landscape treatment shall be provide to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and provide shade. Plant material shall be selected for interest in its structure, texture, and color and for its ultimate growth. Plants should be indigenous, hardy, harmonious and of good appearance. Where plants are susceptible to injury they should be protected. Staff comments: o None of the existing trees have reached 16-inch DBH size that would trigger regulation by the Village s Tree Preservation Ordinance, however the petitioner has listed the quantity that are being removed, transplanted, and replaced for the Commission s reference. 5

Lighting Criteria from Appearance Plan Enhancement of the building design and adjoining landscape Compatible design and size with the building and adjacent areas Restraint in design Avoidance of excessive brightness and brilliant colors Staff comments: o The proposed lighting includes the compliant Sternberg lighting fixtures (18 tall fixture location) that complie with the Village s lighting requirements. POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS: The applicant proposes additional parking improvements adjacent to the multi-family residential development named Cambridge at the Glen. As a result, adequate buffering of the parking lot, clarification of any engineering modifications related to overland drainage that may affect properties to the south, and the lighting levels may be concerns raised by the neighbors. Village Staff has contacted the Cambridge at the Glen HOA President to let her know of the proposed work and forwarded her the staff report. As of press time, no correspondence was received from the public or neighboring properties regarding the proposal. Technical Review PROJECT TIMELINE: A. 05/17/12 Appearance Commission Application received B. 05/29/12 Plan Commission Meeting C. 06/06/12 Appearance Commission Meeting D. 06/15/12 First & Final Consideration by Board of Trustees 2012 A B C D Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 6

REQUIRED APPROVAL(s): The following chart details the necessary required approvals and is provided as a Regulatory Review Appendix. The appendix includes specific descriptions of each regulatory approval, the review criteria, and standards for approval. Each Commissioner has a copy of the appendix and copies for the public are located on the table near the Board Room entrance doors and are available in the Planning Division section of the Village website www.glenview.il.us. Required Regulatory Review A. Annexation B. Annexation with Annexation Agreement C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment D. Official Map Amendment E. Rezoning F. Planned Development G. Conditional Use H. Final Site Plan Review I. Second Curb Cut J. Subdivision (Preliminary, Final, and Waivers) K. Variation(s) (Zoning Board of Appeals) L. Certificate of Appropriateness (Appearance Commission) M. Final Engineering Approval & Outside Agency Permits N. Building Permits O. Building & Engineering Inspections P. Recorded Documents (Development Agreements, Easements, Covenants, etc.) Q. Business License R. Certificate of Occupancy Attachments & Exhibits 1. Sample Motion 2. Ordinance 4392 3. Ordinance 4614 4. Petitioner s Application & Exhibits 7

Sample Motion A. I move in the matter of A2012-044, Anixter Annex Building, the Appearance Commission grants Preliminary Approval, based upon the findings the petitioner, through testimony and application materials, has demonstrated compliance with Section 54-64 Appearance Plan and in accordance with the following documents prepared by Heitman Architects and dated 05/18/12: 1. West and South Elevations (A5.0) 2. East and North Elevations (A5.1) 3. South and West Elevations Enlarged (A5.2) 4. Sign and Trash Enclosure (A1.2) 5. Rendering of Southwest Corner of Anixter Annex Building. B. Anixter Annex (L-2.0 & L-2.1) landscaping plan documents prepared by Rosborough Partners, Inc. and dated 05/16/12. C. Photometrics Plan (EL1.0) prepared by Cartland and Kraus Engineering, LTD and dated 05/18/12. 8