IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY 2016 IOWA EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AND PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY 2016 IOWA EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AND PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS"

Transcription

1 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 0 IOWA EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AND PLANT-INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS CORN PESTS RESEARCH PROJECT DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY AMES, IOWA 00-0 SUE BLODGETT, CHAIR INSECT INVESTIGATED Corn Rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera and Diabrotica barberi Report Authors March 9, 0 Aaron Gassmann File number: 0- Patrick Weber

2 0 IOWA EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AND PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page. Research Personnel.... Introduction and Objective.... Testing Procedures and Evaluations.... Results and Discussion.... Studies Conducted Corn Rootworm Evaluation Tables Ames (Johnson Farm) Comparison among Bt Corn Traits Root Injury/Percent Consistency... 9 AMVAC Aztec-HC Efficacy and Yield Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... 9 Stand Count... 0 Yield... 0 FMC Evaluations Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Yield... FMC Experimental Capture RIVE D on Bt Corn Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Yield... FMC Experimental Capture RIVE D on non-rw Bt Corn Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Yield...

3 Table of Contents (Continued) Page Ames (Johnson Farm)-Continued Neudorff Study on non-rw Bt corn Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Yield... Valent Ampex Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Yield... 8 Boone (Bruner Farm) Comparison among Bt Corn Traits Root Injury/Percent Consistency... 8 Dow AgroSciences Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... 9 Stand Count... 9 Yield... 9 FMC Evaluations Root Injury/Percent Consistency... 0 Stand Count... 0 Yield... FMC Experimental Capture RIVE D on Bt Corn Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Yield... Crawfordsville Valent Ampex Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Lodging... Yield...

4 Table of Contents (Continued) Page Nashua Comparison among Bt Corn Traits Root Injury/Percent Consistency... AMVAC Aztec HC Efficacy and Yield Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... Lodging... Yield... Marrone Bio Innovations Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... Stand Count... 8 Lodging... 8 Yield... 9 Valent Ampex Study Root Injury/Percent Consistency... 9 Stand Count... 0 Lodging... 0 Yield.... Appendix I - Agronomic Information Appendix II Weather Data Appendix III - Materials Tested Appendix IV - Research Pictures... 8

5 0 IOWA EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AND PLANT INCORPORATED PROTECTANTS CORN PESTS RESEARCH PROJECT DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY AMES, IOWA 00-0 Project Leader: Agricultural Specialist: Postdoctoral Research Associate: Research Associate Graduate Research Assistants: Technical Assistants: University Research Farm Superintendents: Aaron Gassmann Patrick Weber Ram Shrestha Ben Brenizer Eric Clifton Kenneth Masloski Coy St. Clair Eric Yu Pierre Alameda Elisabeth Anderson Nao Demand Colton Schaben Devon Shields Kent Berns Mike Fiscus Dallas Maxwell Kenneth Pecinovsky Myron Rees Terry Tuttle

6 INTRODUCTION In Iowa, the species of corn rootworm (CRW) include western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virfigera LeConte and northern corn rootworm D. barberi Smith and Lawrence, and these two species are the most damaging pests of corn, Zea mays, in the Unites States Corn Belt. Eggs are laid in the soil during the summer and hatch the following spring. Larval feeding on corn roots in June may diminish yield by reducing plant growth and drought tolerance, and by imposing harvest losses due to plant lodging. Adult emergence from the soil is underway by early July and continues through late summer. Additional crop losses may be caused by adult beetles feeding on the corn silk and on soft doughy kernels. In Iowa, crop rotation, where it fits cropping practices, remains the preferred method of management. However, it is also economically feasible to protect corn roots with soil applied insecticides and plant-incorporated protectants, which are transgenic corn hybrids that produce insecticidal toxins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). In additional to corn rootworm, several aboveground lepidopteran pests feed on corn in Iowa. These include the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis, black cutworm Agrotis ipsilon, fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda, and corn earworm Helicoverpa zea. Over the last decade, Bt corn varieties have been made commercially available to protect corn from these pests. OBJECTIVE The goal of this research program is to serve the agricultural community of Iowa by monitoring and evaluating the performance of registered and precommercial insecticides and transgenic corn hybrids. To achieve this goal, we maintain a viable, proactive, progressive and scientifically sound product evaluation program. TESTING PROCEDURES AND EVALUATIONS Field Sites: Research plots were established at four Iowa State University research farms in 0: ) Johnson Farm (Ames), ) Bruner Farm (Boone), ) Northeast Research and Demonstration Farm (Nashua) and ) Southeast Research and Demonstration Farm (Crawfordsville). At all locations, two sections of the study site are rotated annually as either research plots or lateplanted trap crop. The seed planted for the trap crop is a mixed maturity blend with a greater proportion of latematuring varieties. This trap crop constitutes a favorable environment for adult female CRW late in the season when other fields are maturing, and can result in a high abudance of CRW larvae the following season. Table lists the studies conducted at each location. METHODS Field plot design: With the exception of the Southeast Research and Demonstartion Farm (Crawfordsville), the experimental design was a randomized complete block with either four or six replications. At the Crawfordsville location, the experimental design had four replications of the two treatments, and these were planted in an alternating pattern. Plot lengths and the number of replications per study are provided in Table.

7 Planting: Seeds were pre-bagged in the laboratory and then planted with a fourrow John Deere Max Emerge TM 00 Integral Rigid Frame Planter that had 0 inch row spacing. Seeds were planted at a depth of inches with a spacing of 0. inches between seeds (,00 seeds per acre). The standard planter fiberglass seed hoppers with attached finger-pickup mechanism were replaced with modified units. On these modified units, the metal plate that covered the fingers had been replaced with a /8 inch clear Plexiglas plate. Inserted through the Plexiglas was a small stainless steel cylinder. The cylinder was positioned to deliver seed to the pickup fingers. At the beginning of each replication, pre-bagged seeds were dumped into the steel cylinder. At the beginning of each replication, a hydraulic motor (attached to the planter s drive shaft) was activated to deliver seed immediately into the ground. At the end of each replication, this same hydraulic motor was activated to expel any unplanted seed, and the finger pickup mechanism was visually inspected through the clear Plexiglas plate to ensure that no seed was present. Planting of three FMC studies (two replicates of FMC Experimental Capture RIVED on non-rw Bt corn and one replicate of FMC Experimental Capture RIVED on Bt Corn), was accomplished with a two-row John Deere planter that had 0 inch row spacing and bulk seed hoppers. Plant-incorporated protectants: Plantincorporated protectants were evaluated in corn hybrids producing insecticidal toxins derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), and these are described in Appendix III. Seed treatments: All the DeKalb hybrids were treated with Poncho 00. All the Mycogen hybrids were treated with Cruiser Extreme 0. All the Syngenta hybrids were treated with Cruiser 0 or 0. All the Pioneer hybrids were treated with either Cruiser 0 + Maxim Quattro + Poncho0/Votivo + PPCT/, or Cruiser 0 + Maxim Quattro + PPCT0. These seed treatments target secondary pests, such as wireworm and seed corn maggot but may have some, limited efficacy against CRW larave at levels higher than 0 mg active ingredient per kernel. Granular soil-applied insecticides: The granular insecticide Force.0G was applied with modified Noble metering units mounted on the planter. The Noble units were calibrated in the laboratory to accurately deliver material at a tractor speed of mph. Force.0G insecticide was applied with in-furrow placement. For the evaluation of Antixx Plus, this product was hand applied for both infurrow and T-Band (eight inches wide) placement in the respective treatments. This Antixx Plus product was weighted out into deli style containers for application in the field. Liquid soil-applied insecticides: Ampex.SC, Capture LFR.SC, Ethos LFR.0SC, Ethos XB.SC, Expedient.0SC, Force 0CS, Tepera Plus 0.8SC, Venerate XC and MBI- 0BMSE were applied in-furrow at planting with a compressed-air system built directly into the planter by Almaco manufacturing (Nevada, IA). Ampex

8 .SC, Capture LFR.SC, Ethos LFR.0SC, Ethos XB.SC, Expedient.0SC, Force 0CS and Tepera Plus 0.8SC were applied as ounces per 000 row feet. Venerate XC and MBI- 0BMSE were applied as gallons per acre. All liquid insecticide was applied with a Teejet XR800EVS spray nozzles at psi to deliver GPA of finished spray at a tractor speed of mph. Ampex, Ethos LFR, Ethos XB, Expedient and Tepera Plus was applied using a starter fertilizer (Nucleus HP 8- -) as the carrier. Capture LFR was applied using both water and starter fertilizer (Nucleus HP 8--) as the carrier. Force 0CS, MBI-0BMSE and Venerate XC used water as the carrier. Liquid products applied in the three FMC studies included Capture LFR.SC, Capture RIVE D.SC, Ethos LFR SC, Ethos XB.SC, Force 0CS, VGR.0WP. These studies were planted with a two row John Deere 00 planter that had 0 inch row spacing. All insecticides were applied as fluid ounces per 000 row feet except for VGR.0WP, which was applied as grams per acre. Capture RIVE D and Force used water as the carrier and all other products used fertilizer (Nucleus Hyperlink HP 8--) as a carrier. All these products were applied in-furrow at a tractor speed of mph. SmartBox TM application of soilapplied insecticides: Aztec-SB.G, and Aztec-HC 9.G insecticide treatments were applied with modified SmartBox TM metering units mounted on the planter. The commercial SmartBox TM units were removed from their large-base containers and sandwiched between a flat metal plate on the bottom and a custom-made, threaded plastic cap on the top. The bottom plate had been fabricated so that it could slide in and out of the same planter mounting brackets used for the Noble units. An inverted L Nalgene bottle attached to the top provided a secure and sealed container for insecticide for the SmartBox TM units. Clear plastic tubes directed the granular insecticides to both the in-furrow and T- band placement. A controller mounted in the tractor cab was used to operate all the SmartBox TM metering units. These units were managed using the AMVAC SmartBox System Manager. All treatments were applied at mph using the fixed speed mode on the SmartBox TM controllers. These SmartBox TM metering units were calibrated before going to the field to deliver ounces of product per 000 row feet. General methodology: During planting, each row was constantly monitored to ensure that insecticides were applied correctly. Final incorporation was accomplished with drag chains mounted behind the closing wheels. Evaluations Stand counts: The number of plants in. row-ft was recorded. This was done early and late in the growing season and then averaged to provide one value for stand counts for each treatment in each block. Root injury: After the majority of corn rootworms had finished feeding, roots were dug to assess feeding injury. This took place from July to August,

9 0. Prior to leaving the field, excess soil was removed from roots and all roots were labeled with study name and plot number using a permanent marker. Roots were cleaned at the ISU Johnson Farm s root washing station. These roots were first soaked in water for between and hours and then washed with a hose to remove any remaining soil. Roots were evaluated for rootworm feeding injury following the Iowa State 0 to Node-Injury Scale: Node-Injury Scale (0-): No feeding injury (lowest rating that can be given)..0 - One node (circle of roots), or the equivalent of an entire node, pruned to within. inches of the stalk or soil line Two nodes pruned Three or more nodes pruned. (Highest rating that can be given) Injury in between complete nodes pruned is noted as the percentage of the node missing (e.g.,.0 = one and a half nodes pruned and 0. = one quarter of one node pruned). The linear node-injury scale allows injury to be expressed intuitively and has proved useful in evaluating minor injury. For an interactive guide to the node-injury scale, see the website for the Department of Entomology at Iowa State University. Lodging counts: A plant was considered lodged if it was leaning at least 0 degrees from vertical. These data were taken at harvest time along with final stand counts. Yields: Studies that were taken to yield were machine harvested with a modified John Deere 90 or 90 plot combine owned by Iowa State University. Weight (pounds) and percent moisture were recorded with either a HarvestMaster brand or Shivvers brand 00 moisture meter and Avery-WeighTronix weigh system/9 weigh scale indicator harvest data collection system. These measurements were converted to bushels per acre of No. shelled corn ( lbs. per bushel) at.% moisture in Microsoft Excel. Data analysis Data were analyzed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures using SAS 9.. When a significant treatment effect was present pairwise comparisons made among means with an experiment wise error rate of P < 0.0. Product consistency: Percent product consistency was calculated as the percentage of times a treatment limited feeding injury to 0. node or less (greater injury can result in economic yield loss, especially when plants are moisture stressed).

10 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Rootworm populations continued to increase in abundance during 0, after falling to very low levels in 0. A survey of injury to untreated checks at the provides a general sense of larval rootworm pressure during 0. Feeding pressure at the Johnson Farm remained moderate to light with untreated checks suffering between 0. nodes to just under.0 nodes of injury. At the Bruner Farm, untreated checks suffered only around 0. nodes of injury. By contrast, injury to untreated non-rootworm Bt corn at the Southeast Research and Demonstration Farm was over. nodes, and at the Northeast Research and Demonstration Farm ranged from just over 0. nodes to just under.0 nodes. In general, growing conditions were good during 0 and effects of root injury on yield were not detected, although a number of differences among treatments in the level of root injury were observed. The one exception was the Southeast Research and Demonstration Farm where soil-applied insecticide increase yield (Table ). At the Johnson Farm, very good root protection was observed in most studies with either Bt-rootworm corn or soil-applied insecticide on non-rootworm Bt corn. A comparison of multiple Bt products found that all significantly reduced injury compared to the untreated check (Table ). Similar results were found in a second study (Table ). This study also found that the addition of soil-applied insecticide achieved a similar level of root protection when applied to Bt versus non-rootworm Bt corn (Table ). A comparison of several soil-applied insecticides containing the active ingredient (AI) bifenthrin all showed similar and significant levels of root protection (Table ), and similar results were found in a study that compared insecticides with different AIs (Table 8). Interestingly, CryBb corn continues to provide a level of root protection similar to soil-applied insecticides at the Johnson Farm, indicating that CryBb resistance remains rare at this location (Table 9). Due to the low to moderate rootworm pressure at Johnson Farm, some studies yielded very little separation between means (Table and Table ). Results for the Bruner were very similar to the Johnson Farm (Tables to 0). At the Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, issues with western corn rootworm resistance to CryBb corn, and cross-resistance to mcrya and ecry.ab, were observed. Both CryBb corn and corn pyramided with mcry and ecry.ab suffered significantly higher injury than corn with Cry/Ab (Table ). Similarly, we found that CryBb corn had higher injury than corn with Cry/Ab or non-bt corn with soil-applied insecticide (Table ). For corn with Cry/Ab and a blended refuge (i.e., non-bt seeds mixed with Bt seeds), the application of soil-applied insecticide led to a decrease in root injury (ca. 0. nodes). However, these differences were not statistically significant. In a study comparing various soil-applied insecticides on nonrootworm Bt corn, all insecticides reduced injury compared to the untreated check, however, differences among insecticides were present (Table ). Aztec, Force and Ampex all led to a greater reduction in injury than Capture, and Aztec reduced injury more than all other insecticides (Table ).

11 AGRONOMIC INFORMATION, WEATHER DATA AND MATERIALS TESTED AND PICTURES OF RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Agronomic information and field history are listed in Appendix I. Weather data from the test site or the nearest Iowa climatological station are listed in Appendix II. Information on materials tested is listed in Appendix III. Pictures of various research activities are in Appendix IV. RESEARCH SUPPORT Support for this research was provided by the Iowa State University Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station and by the following companies: AMVAC, Dow AgroSciences, DuPont- Pioneer, FMC, Neudorff, Marrone Bio Innovations, Monsanto, and Valent. WAIVER OF ENDORSEMENT This report deals with the relative ability of each treatment to protect corn from damage by insects. This information is not presented to endorse the use of any product and the name of Iowa State University should not appear in any advertising without prior written consent. Iowa State University, their respective officers, agents, or employees, have not made, and do not hereby make, any representation, warranty or covenant with respect to the use of these test results, nor will they be liable for any damages, losses, or claims, including those of an incidental or consequential nature, arising out of the use of these test results. We would also like to thank Calcium Products (Andrew Hoiberg) for the generous donation of tons of pelletized lime for applying at the ISU Johnson farm to adjust the ph of the field plot soils.

12 8 Table. Iowa evaluation of insecticides and plant-incorporated protectants. Experimental Unit Size Table Entries/ Rows/ Row # Test Location Type of Studies Numbers Test Plot Length (ft) Reps Ames-Johnson Farm Boone-Bruner Farm )Comparison among Bt Corn Traits )AMVAC Aztec-HC Efficacy and Yield Study )FMC Evaluations )FMC Capture RIVED on Bt Corn )FMC Capture RIVED on non-rw Bt Corn )Neudorff Study on non-rw Bt Corn )Valent Ampex Study )Comparison among Bt Corn Traits )Dow AgroSciences Study )FMC Evaluations )FMC Experimental Capture RIVED on Traited Corn All these studies were conducted following corn rootworm trap crop, to ensure the presence of rootworm larvae in the study Crawfordsville ) Valent Ampex Study - 8 Nashua )Comparison among Bt Corn Traits )AMVAC Aztec-HC Efficacy and Yield Study )Marrone Bio Innovations Study )Valent Ampex Study

13 9 Table. Node injury and product consistency in comparison among Bt corn traits: Johnson Farm, Ames Node- Product Treatment Injury,, Consistency 8,9 Agrisure Duracade 0.0a 00a DeKalb VT 0.0ab 9a Pioneer HXX 0.8 b 80a Agrisure, DeKalb, Pioneer non-rw Bt 0.9 c 0 b Planted April, 0; evaluated August 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; The following three non-rw Bt seeds were mixed together equally in bag; Agrisure non-rw Bt (Agrisure NH-GTA); DeKalb non-rw Bt (DKC 8-89 VTP RIB); Pioneer non-rw Bt (P088HR); Pioneer HXX = Pioneer HXX (P08HXX); DeKalb VT = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple (DKC 8-8); Agrisure Duracade = Agrisure Duracade Artesian (Agrisure NA-A) Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Table. Average root-injury and product consistency for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Johnson Farm, Ames. Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency,8 DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 9a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a DeKalb SSTX RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.08a 00a Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.a 9a DeKalb SSTX RIB a 9a Pioneer AMX a 90a Pioneer AMXT a 8a DeKalb VT RIB a ab DeKalb non-rw Bt a 0ab Pioneer non-rw Bt b b Planted May, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less

14 0 Table. Average stand count for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Johnson Farm, Ames. Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb RIB SSTX DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB. Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.0 DeKalb VT RIB Pioneer AMXT DeKalb RIB SSTX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00 DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt Pioneer AMX Pioneer non-rw Bt Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00 Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00 Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = Insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Table. Average yield for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Johnson Farm, Ames. Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 9a DeKalb non-rw Bt a DeKalb VT RIB a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0a DeKalb RIB SSTX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 9a DeKalb RIB SSTX a Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 9 b Pioneer AMXT b Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 9 b Pioneer non-rw Bt b Pioneer AMX b Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 80 b Planted May, 0; machine harvested October 9, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x 8 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture

15 Table. Average root injury and product consistency for FMC evaluations: Johnson farm, Ames Treatment Form Form. Node- Product Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0a 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Tepera Plus 0.8SC 0. Furrow 0.0a 00 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0a 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0. Furrow 0.0a 00 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Expedient.0SC 0. Furrow 0.0a 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt b 0 Planted May, 0; evaluated August 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -98); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet T-band & In-furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Stand counts for FMC evaluations: Johnson Farm, Ames Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb non-rw Bt + Tepera Plus 0.8SC 0. Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0. Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Expedient.0SC 0. Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 9.00 Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -98); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluations) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

16 Table 8. Average yield for FMC evaluations: Johnson Farm, Ames Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Tepera Plus 0.8SC 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 8 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Expedient.0SC 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0. Furrow 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted May, 0; machine harvested October 9, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -98); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture Table 9. Node injury and product consistency for FMC Capture RIVED on Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow 0.09a 9 DeKalb VTP + Force 0CS 0. Furrow 0.09a 9 DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.a 9 DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow 0.a 9 DeKalb VTP RIB a 9 DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.a 8 DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.a DeKalb non-rw Bt b 0 Planted May, 0; evaluated August 0, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier. All Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet except product VGR listed as grams per acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

17 Table 0. Stand counts for FMC Capture RIVED on Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow.00 DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb VTP RIB + Force 0CS 0. Furrow.00 DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow.0 DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow.0 DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow. DeKalb VTP RIB Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier All Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet except product VGR listed as grams per acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x. row-feet/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Yield for FMC Capture RIVED on Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb VTP RIB R DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Force 0CS 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow Planted May, 0; Machine harvested October 9, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier. All Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet except product VGR listed as grams per acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture

18 Table. Node injury and product consistency for FMC Capture RIVED on non-rw Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames. Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force 0CS 0. Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.8 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow 0.9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. DeKalb VTP RIB DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow 0. 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted May, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier. Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Stand counts for FMC Capture RIVED on non-rw Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames. Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow.00a DeKalb non-rw Bt ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force 0CS 0. Furrow.0ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow.0ab DeKalb VTP RIB ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow.ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow.00 b DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow.00 b Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x. row-feet/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0)

19 Table. Yield for FMC Capture RIVED on Non-RW Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames. ` Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb VTP RIB R DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force 0CS 0. Furrow 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 8 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow Planted May, 0; Machine harvested October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier. Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture Table. Node injury and product consistency for Neudorff study on non-rw Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force G 0. Furrow 0.a 90 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a T-Band 0.ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a Furrow 0.ab DeKalb non-rw Bt ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a Furrow 0. b 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a T-Band 0. b 0 Planted May, 0; evaluated August 9, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb - 98 RIB VTP) Force Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow & T-Band = insecticide and bait applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

20 Table. Stand counts for Neudorff study on non-rw Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a T-Band. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force G 0. Furrow.0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a T-Band.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a Furrow 0.0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb - 98 RIB VTP) Force Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow & T-Band = insecticide and bait applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x. row-feet/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Yield for Neudorff study on non-rw Bt corn: Johnson Farm, Ames Treatment Form. Rate R Bushels/ Placement Acre,, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a Furrow 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a Furrow 8 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force G 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a T-Band 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb non-rw Bt + Antixx Plus lbs/a T-Band Planted May, 0; Machine harvested October 9, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb - 98 RIB VTP) Force Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow & T-Band = insecticide and bait applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture

21 Table 8. Average root injury and product consistency for Valent Ampex study: Johnson Farm, Ames Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.09ab 00a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force.0G 0. Furrow 0.09ab 00a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. b 80 b DeKalb non-rw Bt c 0 b Planted May, 0; evaluated August 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Chemical and check means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9. No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table 9. Stand counts for Valent Ampex study: Johnson Farm, Ames Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force.0G 0. Furrow.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow. Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluations) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

22 8 Table 0. Average yields for the Valent Ampex study: Johnson Farm, Ames Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb VT + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 9 DeKalb VT + Force.0G 0. Furrow 8 DeKalb VT + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB DeKalb VT + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb VT Planted May, 0; machine harvested October 9, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-rows/ treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture Table. Node injury and product consistency in comparison among Bt traits study: Bruner Farm, Boone Node- Product Treatment Injury,, Consistency, Agrisure Duracade 0.a 90a DeKalb VT 0.a 9a Pioneer HXX 0.a 9a Agrisure, DeKalb, Pioneer non-rw Bt 0. b 0 b Planted May, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; The following three non-rw Bt seeds were mixed together equally in bag; Agrisure non-rw Bt (Agrisure NH-GTA); DeKalb non-rw Bt (DKC 8-89 VTP RIB); Pioneer non-rw Bt (P088HR); Pioneer HXX = Pioneer HXX (P08HXX); DeKalb VT = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple (DKC 8-8); Agrisure Duracade = Agrisure Duracade Artesian (Agrisure NA-A) Means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0)

23 9 Table. Average root injury and product consistency for the Dow AgroSciences study: Bruner Farm, Boone Node- Product Treatment Injury,, Consistency, Mycogen Smartstax 0.0a 00 Mycogen non-rw Bt 0. b 8 Planted May, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Mycogen non-rw Bt = Mycogen brand (Mycogen A-base genetics); Mycogen Smartstax = Mycogen brand Smartstax (Mycogen A) Check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Chemical and check means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less. No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Stand counts for the Dow AgroSciences study: Bruner Farm, Boone Stand Treatment Counts, Mycogen non-rw Bt.0 Mycogen Smartstax 9. Planted May, 0; evaluated June and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Mycogen non-rw Bt = Mycogen brand (Mycogen A-base genetics); Mycogen Smartstax = Mycogen brand Smartstax (Mycogen A) Check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluations) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Average yields for the Dow AgoSciences study: Bruner Farm, Boone Bushels/ Treatment Acre,, Mycogen non-rw Bt Mycogen Smartstax Planted May, 0; machine harvested October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Mycogen non-rw Bt = Mycogen brand (Mycogen A-base genetics); Mycogen Smartstax = Mycogen brand Smartstax (Mycogen A) Check means based on observations (-rows/ treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture

24 0 Table. Average root injury and product consistency for FMC evaluations; Bruner farm, Boone Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0. Furrow 0.09a 90 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0a 00 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Expedient.0SC 0. Furrow 0.0a 90 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0a 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Tepera Plus 0.8SC 0. Furrow 0.a 90 DeKalb non-rw Bt b 0 Planted May, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -98); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Stand counts for FMC evaluations: Bruner Farm, Boone Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Expedient.0SC 0. Furrow. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Tepera Plus 0.8SC 0. Furrow 0.0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0. Furrow 0.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted May, 0; evaluated May and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -98); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluations) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

25 Table. Average yield for FMC evaluations: Bruner Farm, Boone. Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos LFR.0SC 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Tepera Plus 0.8SC 0. Furrow 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Expedient.0SC 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted May, 0; machine harvested October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -98); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture Table 8. Node injury and product consistency for FMC Capture RIVED on Bt corn: Bruner Farm, Boone Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb VTP RIB + Force 0CS 0. Furrow 0.0a 00a DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0a 00a DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow 0.0a 00a DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.08a 00a DeKalb VTP RIB a 00a DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.09a 9a DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow 0.0a 9a DeKalb non-rw Bt b b Planted May, 0 evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier All Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet except product VGR listed as grams per acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0)

26 Table 9. Stand counts for FMC Capture RIVED on Bt corn: Bruner Farm, Boone Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt a DeKalb VTP RIB b DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow.00 b DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow.00 b DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow.00 bc DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow.00 c DeKalb VTP RIB + Force 0CS 0. Furrow. c DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow. c Planted May, 0; evaluated June and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier All Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet except product VGR listed as grams per acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x. row-feet/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Table 0. Yield for FMC Capture RIVED on Bt corn: Bruner Farm, Boone Treatment Form. Rate R Bushels/ Placement Acre,, DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR+VGR.SC Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 9 DeKalb VTP RIB DeKalb VTP RIB + Ethos XB.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb VTP RIB + Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb VTP RIB + Force 0CS 0. Furrow 0 8 Planted May, 0; Machine harvested October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP RIB (DeKalb -98); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC -9); All treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier except the Force and Capture RIVE D treatments which used water as a carrier All Insecticides listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet except product VGR listed as grams per acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x row-feet/treatment x replications) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture 8 These mean data based on observations (-row treatment x row-feet/treatment x replications)

27 Table. Average root injury and product consistency for the Valent Ampex study: Southeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Crawfordsville Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0. Furrow 0.a a DeKalb non-rw Bt b b Planted April, 0; evaluated July 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0). Both treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier. Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations (0 roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Chemical and check means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9. Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Table. Stand counts for the Valent Ampex study: Southeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Crawfordsville Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0. Furrow 9.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted April, 0; evaluated May and November, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0). Both treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier. Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluations) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

28 Table. Average lodging for the Valent Ampex study: Southeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Crawfordsville Treatment Form. Rate Placement Lodging, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0. Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt Planted April, 0; evaluated November, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0). Both treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier. Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (8 rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Average yields for the Valent Ampex study: Southeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Crawfordsville Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0. Furrow 90a DeKalb non-rw Bt b Planted April, 0; machine harvested November, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0). Both treatments included Starter Fertilizer as a carrier. Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-rows/ treatment x 0 row-feet/treatment x replications) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture

29 Table. Node injury and product consistency for comparison among Bt traits: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Node- Product Treatment Injury,, Consistency, Pioneer HXX 0.0a 00a Agrisure Duracade 0. b 0a DeKalb VT 0. b 0ab Agrisure, DeKalb, Pioneer non-rw Bt. c 0 b Planted April, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; The following three non-rw Bt seeds were mixed together equally in bag; Agrisure non-rw Bt (Agrisure NH-GTA); DeKalb non-rw Bt (DKC 8-89 VTP RIB); Pioneer non-rw Bt (P088HR); Pioneer HXX = Pioneer HXX (P08HXX); DeKalb VT = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple (DKC 8-8); Agrisure Duracade = Agrisure Duracade Artesian (Agrisure NA-A) Means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Table. Average root-injury and product consistency for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency,8 Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a DeKalb RIB SSTX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.ab 9a Pioneer AMX abc 90a DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.abc 80a DeKalb RIB SSTX abc 90a Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.abc 8a Pioneer AMXT bcd 0ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.8 cd 0abc DeKalb VT RIB d abc DeKalb non-rw Bt e bc Pioneer non-rw Bt e 0 c Planted May, 0; evaluated August, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less

30 Table. Average stand count for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00a Pioneer non-rw Bt a DeKalb RIB SSTX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.00a Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB.a DeKalb non-rw Bt ab Pioneer AMX ab Pioneer AMXT ab DeKalb RIB SSTX ab Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 9.0abc DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 8.00 bc DeKalb VT RIB c Planted May, 0; evaluated June and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) Table 8. Average lodging for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Treatment Form. Rate Placement Lodging, DeKalb RIB SSTX a Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0a Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0a DeKalb RIB SSTX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB ab Pioneer AMX ab Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB ab Pioneer AMXT ab DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB ab DeKalb VT RIB ab Pioneer non-rw Bt ab DeKalb non-rw Bt b Planted May, 0; evaluated October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on 8 observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0)

31 Table 9. Average yield for AMVAC Aztec-HC efficacy and yield study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB DeKalb RIB SSTX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0 DeKalb RIB SSTX DeKalb VT RIB + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 0 DeKalb non-rw Bt Pioneer AMXT + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 00 DeKalb VT RIB Pioneer AMX Pioneer AMX + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 9 Pioneer AMXT Pioneer non-rw Bt + Aztec-HC 9.G 0. Furrow-SB 8 Pioneer non-rw Bt Planted May, 0; machine harvested October 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTP (DKC 8-89); DeKalb VTP RIB = DeKalb brand YieldGard VT Triple Pro RIB (DKC 8-8); DeKalb SSTX RIB = DeKalb brand Smartstax RIB (DKC 8-8); Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P9R); Pioneer AMX = Pioneer brand Herculex XTRA (P9AMX); Pioneer AMXT = Pioneer Optimum AcreMax Extreme (P9AMXT) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture Table 0. Average root-injury and product consistency for Marrone Bio Innovations study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow 0.a Pioneer non-rw Bt + MBI-0BMSE Furrow 0.8ab Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow 0.abc Pioneer non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. bc 0 Pioneer non-rw Bt c 0 Planted April, 0; evaluated August &, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P08HR) Capture LFR Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet. Venerate XC & MBI-0BMSE products listed as gallon per Acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9 No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

32 8 Table. Average stand count for Marrone Bio Innovations study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow.0 Pioneer non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.0 Pioneer non-rw Bt Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow 0.00 Pioneer non-rw Bt + MBI-0BMSE Furrow 0.00 Planted April, 0; evaluated June and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P08HR) Capture LFR Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet. Venerate XC and MBI-0BMSE products listed as gallon per Acre Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluation dates) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Average lodging for Marrone Bio Innovations study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Treatment Form. Rate Placement Lodging, Pioneer non-rw Bt + MBI-0BMSE Furrow Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow Pioneer non-rw Bt Pioneer non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow Planted April, 0; evaluated October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P08HR) Capture LFR Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet. Venerate XC & MBI-0BMSE products listed as gallon per Acre Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0)

33 9 Table. Average yield for Marrone Bio Innovations study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow Pioneer non-rw Bt Pioneer non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 8 Pioneer non-rw Bt + Venerate XC Furrow Pioneer non-rw Bt + MBI-0BMSE Furrow Planted April, 0; machine harvested October 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; Pioneer non-rw Bt = Pioneer brand RR (P08HR) Capture LFR Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet. Venerate XC & MBI-0BMSE products listed as gallon per Acre Furrow = insecticide applied at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-row treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture Table. Average root injury and product consistency for the Valent Ampex study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Node- Product Treatment Form. Rate Placement Injury,, Consistency 8,9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB 0.0a 00a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force.0G 0. Furrow 0. b ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow 0.8 b 0ab DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. c b DeKalb non-rw Bt d 0 c Planted April, 0; evaluated August &, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on 0 observations ( roots/ rows x replications) Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-). Number of full or partial nodes completely eaten Chemical and check means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0) 8 Product consistency = Percentage of times nodal injury was 0. (¼ node eaten) or less 9. Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0)

34 0 Table. Stand counts for the Valent Ampex study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Stand Treatment Form. Rate Placement Counts, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow.00 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force.0G 0. Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow 0. DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB 9.00 Planted April, 0; evaluated June and October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications x evaluations) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Table. Average lodging for Valent Ampex study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Treatment Form. Rate Placement Lodging, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB 0a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force.0G 0. Furrow 0a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 0a DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow a DeKalb non-rw Bt b Planted April, 0; evaluated October, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations ( rows/ treatment x. row-ft/treatment x replications) Means sharing a common letter do not differ significantly according to Ryan s Q Test (P < 0.0)

35 Table. Average yields for the Valent Ampex study: Northeast Iowa Research and Demonstration Farm, Nashua Bushels/ Treatment Form. Rate Placement Acre,, DeKalb non-rw Bt + Force.0G 0. Furrow 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt + Aztec-SB.G 0. Furrow-SB 9 DeKalb non-rw Bt DeKalb non-rw Bt + Ampex.SC 0.0 Furrow DeKalb non-rw Bt + Capture LFR.SC 0.0 Furrow 9 Planted April, 0; machine harvested October 8, 0 non-rw Bt = an absence of any Bt trait targeting corn rootworm; DeKalb non-rw Bt = DeKalb brand VTPro RIB (DKC -0) Insecticide listed as ounces a.i. per,000 row-feet Furrow = Insecticide applied at planting time; Furrow-SB = insecticide applied with SmartBox system at planting time Chemical and check means based on observations (-rows/ treatment x 9 row-feet/treatment x replications) No significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.0) Yields converted to.% Moisture

36 APPENDIX I Agronomic Information

37 0 Field History Data Ames, IA-ISU Johnson Farm Corn Rootworm studies (following trap crop) Boone, IA-ISU Bruner Farm Corn Rootworm studies (following trap crop) Insecticide History 0 No Insecticide (trap crop) Corn (Trap crop) 0 Insecticide Test Plot Corn (Insecticide Test Plot) 0 No Insecticide (trap crop) Corn 0 Insecticide Test Plot Corn Tillage Variety Fall 0-disk ripper ( inch) Spring 0-field cultivation (X) DeKalb DKC 8-8 VT, DeKalb DKC 8-89 VTP RIB, Pioneer P088HR, Pioneer P08HXX, Agrisure NH- GTA, Agrisure NA-A, DeKalb DKC -98 VTP RIB, DKC -9 VTP RIB, DKC -0 VTP RIB Fall 0-chopped stalks & Chisel plow; Spring 0-field cultivation (X) DeKalb DKC 8-8 VT, DeKalb DKC 8-89 VTP RIB, Pioneer P088HR, Pioneer P08HXX, Agrisure NH-GTA, Agrisure NA-A, DeKalb DKC -98 VTP RIB, DKC -9 VTP RIB Mycogen A Planting Date April, May,,, May Planting Rate,00 seeds/a,00 seeds/a Herbicides. pts. Surestart + 0 oz. Harness-April -PRE; oz. Capreno + COC-June -POST. oz. Corvus + UAN-May - PRE; 0. oz. Impact +. oz. Roundup-June -POST;. oz. Laudis-June -POST Fertilizer N P K S Zn N P K S Zn Fall/0 Preplant Fall/ Applied 000 ecce lbs (actual) of 9% ecce pelletized lime Dates Stand Count May & ; October & June ; October Root Digging August & 0 August Lodging October & October Harvest October 9 October Soil Type Clay loam & loam Silty clay loam Soil Organic Matter %.. Soil ph.. Expressed as formulation per acre. Expressed as pounds per acre. Fall/0 applied- lbs. Nitrogen, 0 lbs. Phosphorus, 0 lbs. Potassium, lbs. Sulfur,. lbs. Zinc applied on November, 0 at ISU Johnson Farm (Ames); Spring-preplant 90 lbs., Liquid UAN applied on April at ISU Johnson Farm (Ames); Fall/0 applied- 8 lbs. Nitrogen, 0 lbs. Phosphorus, lbs. Sulfur,. lbs. Zinc applied on November 9, 0 at ISU Bruner Farm (Boone); Spring- Spring-preplant 9 lbs., UAN applied on May at ISU Bruner Farm (Boone); Spring-preplant 0 lbs., dry potash fertilizer applied on March at ISU Bruner Farm (Boone);

38 0 Field History Data Crawfordsville, IA-ISU Southeast Farm Corn Rootworm studies (following trap crop) Nashua, IA-ISU Northeast Farm Corn Rootworm studies (following trap crop) Insecticide History 0 No Insecticide (trap crop) No Insecticide (trap crop) 0 Insecticide Test Plot Insecticide Test Plot 0 No Insecticide (trap crop) No Insecticide (trap crop) 0 Insecticide Test Plot Insecticide Test Plot Tillage Fall 0-chisel plow; Spring 0-field cultivation (X) Fall 0-chisel plow; Spring 0-field cultivation (X) Variety DeKalb DKC -0 VTP RIB DeKalb DKC 8-89 VTP RIB, DeKalb DKC 8-8 VTP RIB, DeKalb DKC 8-8 SSTX RIB, Pioneer P9R, Pioneer P9AMX, Pioneer P9AMXT, Pioneer P08HR, DeKalb DKC -0 VTP RIB, Pioneer P08HXX, Agrisure NH-GTA, Agrisure NA-A Planting Date(s) April April Planting Rate,00 seeds/a,00 seeds/a Herbicides oz. Zidua +. lbs. Atrazine-May -PRE; pts. Halex GT + Atrazine 0. lb.-june -POST. pts. Guardsman Max-April 8- PRE; oz. Roundup WeatherMax- June 0-POST Fertilizer N P K N P K Preplant Dates Stand Count May ; November June ; October Root Digging August August Lodging November October Harvest November October 8 Soil Type Silty Clay Loam Loam Soil Organic Matter %..9 Soil ph.9. Expressed as formulation per acre. Expressed as pounds per acre. Spring-Preplant 00 lbs. per acre actual nitrogen applied as anhydrous ammonia (8.-0-0) on April at Crawfordsville. Spring-Preplant 00 lbs. per acre actual nitrogen applied as anhydrous ammonia (8.-0-0) on April 0 at Nashua.

39 APPENDIX II Weather Data

40 Ames & Boone 0 Rainfall and Temperature April May June Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located miles WSW of Ames at ISU AEA/Agronomy Farm. Low/High Temperatures & Rainfall amounts for Ames & Boone from Mesonet Weather Station website at:

41 Ames & Boone 0 Rainfall and Temperature July August September Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located miles WSW of Ames at ISU AEA/Agronomy Farm.

42 8 Ames & Boone 0 Rainfall and Temperature October Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total.9 0. Normal.. D.F.N.. -. Weather station located miles WSW of Ames at ISU AEA/Agronomy Farm.

43 9 Crawfordsville 0 Rainfall and Temperature April May June Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located at study site. Rainfall amounts manually recorded at study site. Low/High Temperatures for Crawfordsville from Mesonet Weather Station website at:

44 0 Crawfordsville 0 Rainfall and Temperature July August September Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located at test site. Rainfall amounts manually recorded at study site.

45 Crawfordsville 0 Rainfall and Temperature October November Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located at test site. Rainfall amounts manually recorded at study site.

46 Nashua 0 Rainfall and Temperature April May June Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Tr-Rn Tr-Sn Frost Tr-Rn Tr-Rn Tr-Rn Tr-Rn Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located at test site. Rainfall amounts manually recorded at study site. Low/High Temperatures for Nashua from Mesonet Weather Station website at:

47 Nashua 0 Rainfall and Temperature July August September Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Tr-Rn Tr-Rn Tr-Rn Mean/Total Normal D.F.N Weather station located at Study site. Rainfall amounts manually recorded at study site.

48 Nashua 0 Rainfall and Temperature October Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Temp ( F) Rainfall Day Low High Inches Low High Inches Low High Inches Mean/Total.. Normal 9..0 D.F.N Weather station located at test site. Rainfall amounts manually recorded at study site.

49 APPENDIX III Materials Tested

50 Table. Conventional insecticides used in studies in 0 Product name Rate (ounces a.i. per 000 row-feet; unless specified) Active ingredient Company Ampex.SC 0.0 clothianidin Valent Corporation Antixx Plus & 0 lbs/a Iron phosphate Neudorff Aztec-SB.G 0. tebupirimphos & cyfluthrin AMVAC Chem. Corp. Aztec-HC 9.G 0. tebupirimphos & cyfluthrin AMVAC Chem. Corp. Capture RIVE D.SC 0.0 bifenthrin FMC Corporation Capture LFR.SC 0.0 bifenthrin FMC Corporation AMVAC Chem. Expedient 0. bifenthrin Corp. Ethos LFR.0SC 0.9 bifenthrin FMC Corporation Ethos XB.SC 0.0 bifenthrin FMC Corporation Force G 0. tefluthrin Syngenta Force 0CS 0. & 0. tefluthrin Syngenta Tepera Plus 0.0 bifenthrin FMC Corporation Heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain A9 Marrone Bio Venerate XC 0. &.0 Gallon/Acre cells and spent fermentation media Innovations

51 Table. Rootworm active Bt Traits Product name Events targeting rootworm Toxin Company Agrisure 000GT Agrisure MIR0 mcrya Syngenta Agrisure DAS-9- + MIR0 Cry/Ab + mcrya Syngenta Agrisure A MIR0 + 0 mcrya + ecry.ab Syngenta Herculex DAS-9- Cry/Ab Pioneer & Dow AgroSciences Pioneer AMX DAS-9- Cry/Ab DuPont-Pioneer Pioneer AMXT DAS-9- + MIR0 Cry/Ab + mcrya DuPont-Pioneer Pioneer OAM DAS-9- Cry/Ab DuPont-Pioneer Smartstax DAS-9- + MON 880 Cry/Ab + CryBb Dow AgroSciences & Monsanto VT Triple MON 880 CryBb Monsanto

52 8 APPENDIX IV Research Pictures

53 9 Field crew for 0 Evaluating corn root systems for corn rootworm larvae feeding following the Iowa State Node-Injury Scale (0-)

54 0 Field research personnel evaluating seed corn maggot study at the ISU Johnson farm Screen houses installed over corn plots at the ISU Bruner Farm in Boone, IA. Screen houses are used to collect corn rootworm beetles from traited and non-rw Bt corn.

(F) CORN: Zea mays L. 'Pioneer 32T85, Pioneer 32T84 HERCULEX BT TRANSGENIC HYBRIDS AND FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE AT

(F) CORN: Zea mays L. 'Pioneer 32T85, Pioneer 32T84 HERCULEX BT TRANSGENIC HYBRIDS AND FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE AT (F) CORN: Zea mays L. 'Pioneer 32T85, Pioneer 32T84 HERCULEX BT TRANSGENIC HYBRIDS AND FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2008 Terry A. DeVries South Central Agricultural

More information

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN (F) CORN: Zea mays L. DeKalb DKC63-33 RIB and DeKalb DKC63-25 EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL,

More information

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN

EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN (F) CORN: Zea mays L. DeKalb DKC64-87RIB and DeKalb DKC64-89RIB EVALUATION OF SMARTSTAX TRAITED AND REFUGE CORN HYBRIDS IN COMBINATION WITH SOIL INSECTICIDES AT PLANTING FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL,

More information

2006 CORN ROOTWORM EFFICACY TRIAL YIELDGARD ROOTWORM COMPARISON TO SOIL INSECTICIDES AND SEED TREATMENTS 1. Final Report

2006 CORN ROOTWORM EFFICACY TRIAL YIELDGARD ROOTWORM COMPARISON TO SOIL INSECTICIDES AND SEED TREATMENTS 1. Final Report The linked image cannot be dis 2006 CORN ROOTWORM EFFICACY TRIAL YIELDGARD ROOTWORM COMPARISON TO SOIL INSECTICIDES AND SEED TREATMENTS 1 Final Report University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development

More information

INVESTIGATOR: Bruce Potter - University of Minnesota Extension Travis Vollmer University of Minnesota Southwest Research and Outreach Center

INVESTIGATOR: Bruce Potter - University of Minnesota Extension Travis Vollmer University of Minnesota Southwest Research and Outreach Center SW MN IPM RESEARCH - 2017 STUDY: 2017 Rootworm Insecticide on Refuge Hybrid INVESTIGATOR: Bruce Potter - University of Minnesota Extension Travis Vollmer University of Minnesota Southwest Research and

More information

2007 Herculex Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide / Seed Treatment Efficacy Experiment. 1. Data Summary

2007 Herculex Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide / Seed Treatment Efficacy Experiment. 1. Data Summary 2007 Herculex Corn Rootworm Soil Insecticide / Seed Treatment Efficacy Experiment. 1 Data Summary University of Nebraska Agricultural Research and Development Center Mead, Nebraska Lance J. Meinke, Jim

More information

GRANULAR AND LIQUID INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS FOR LARVAL CORN

GRANULAR AND LIQUID INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS FOR LARVAL CORN (F) CORN: Zea mays L. 'Novartis N71M-GT/CB/LL' GRANULAR AND LIQUID INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS FOR LARVAL CORN ROOTWORM CONTROL, 2008 Terry A. DeVries South Central Agricultural Laboratory University of Nebraska-Lincoln

More information

2000 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA

2000 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2000 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA Lance J. Meinke, Jim Brown, Jenny Stebbing, Bill McCormick Department

More information

2001 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA

2001 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA 2001 CORN ROOTWORM SOIL INSECTICIDE EVALUATIONS AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MEAD, NEBRASKA Lance J. Meinke, Jim Brown, Jenny Stebbing, Bill McCormick Department of Entomology University

More information

2013 BT-Corn Rootworm Failure in CNY: A canary in the coal mine? Elson Shields, Dept of Entomology Cornell University, Ithaca

2013 BT-Corn Rootworm Failure in CNY: A canary in the coal mine? Elson Shields, Dept of Entomology Cornell University, Ithaca 2013 BT-Corn Rootworm Failure in CNY: A canary in the coal mine? Elson Shields, Dept of Entomology Cornell University, Ithaca Corn Rootworm Adults Northern corn rootworm is on the left Western corn rootworm

More information

Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005

Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005 Corn Rootworm Control in Field Corn with planting time treatments. Soil Insecticide Test # 3, 2005 Pest: Crop: Location: Western Corn Rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Corn, Zea mays L. 26 treatments

More information

Has the Reserve Team become the Varsity?

Has the Reserve Team become the Varsity? Corn Pest Management Has the Reserve Team become the Varsity? Advanced Crop Advisers Workshop February 10, 2015 Fargo, North Dakota Janet Knodel NDSU Extension Entomologist Dean Malvick UMN Extension Plant

More information

Pennsylvania Fresh-market Sweet Corn IPM. by Shelby Fleischer, Lee Young & David Biddinger 11/9/07

Pennsylvania Fresh-market Sweet Corn IPM. by Shelby Fleischer, Lee Young & David Biddinger 11/9/07 Pennsylvania Fresh-market Sweet Corn IPM by Shelby Fleischer, Lee Young & David Biddinger 11/9/07 Pennsylvania sweet corn production ranks in the top ten nationally with more than 20,000 acres worth about

More information

County: Columbia. See factors. N/A Starter : N/A N/A N/A Post plant : See factors 6 /15/17 N/A. Insecticide:

County: Columbia. See factors. N/A Starter : N/A N/A N/A Post plant : See factors 6 /15/17 N/A. Insecticide: 133 Title: Personnel: Location: Supported By: Site Information Field: ARS:336 Soil Test: Date: 11/1 /16 FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Multi-factor effects for continuous and rotated corn Experiment: 19Systems

More information

Developing integrated control tactics for cole crop pests. Final report, 13 February 2008

Developing integrated control tactics for cole crop pests. Final report, 13 February 2008 Developing integrated control tactics for cole crop pests Final report, 13 February 2008 Celeste Welty, Associate Professor of Entomology; OSU Extension Entomology Building, 1991 Kenny Road, Columbus OH

More information

CPICOOP.COM SEED GUIDE PUBLICATION

CPICOOP.COM SEED GUIDE PUBLICATION CPICOOP.COM 205 SEED GUIDE A PUBLICATION 02-08 RELATIVE MATURITY KEY -Best -Good 5-Watch EARLY CORN HYBRIDS BRAND DEKALB DEKALB DEKALB NK NK NK MYCOGEN MYCOGEN HYBRID 5-9 54-8 52-6 NK59B N45P N54H 2K595

More information

EFFECT OF IN-FURROW FUNGICIDE APPLICATION METHOD ON CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA AND SUGARBEET STAND ESTABLISHMENT. Jason R. Brantner and Jeffrey D.

EFFECT OF IN-FURROW FUNGICIDE APPLICATION METHOD ON CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA AND SUGARBEET STAND ESTABLISHMENT. Jason R. Brantner and Jeffrey D. EFFECT OF IN-FURROW FUNGICIDE APPLICATION METHOD ON CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA AND SUGARBEET STAND ESTABLISHMENT Jason R. Brantner and Jeffrey D. Nielsen Research Fellow and Assistant Scientist, respectively

More information

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY 114 FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY Title: Corn silage yield and quality response to fungicides Experiment: 10Pest Trial ID: 6123 Year: 2016 Personnel: Location: Supported By: J. G. Lauer, T. H. Diallo, K. D.

More information

Why Azospirillum? Azospirillum is a naturally occurring soil bacteria that stimulates root development.

Why Azospirillum? Azospirillum is a naturally occurring soil bacteria that stimulates root development. Azospirillum Why Azospirillum? Azospirillum is a naturally occurring soil bacteria that stimulates root development. Azospirillum also captures atmospheric nitrogen and converts it to a form of nitrogen

More information

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 10 and 13, points possible

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 10 and 13, points possible AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 10 and 13, 2013 100 points possible Name There are 15 questions plus a bonus question, each of which requires a short answer. Please be concise. Best wishes for your success!

More information

Why We Sell Conventional Corn

Why We Sell Conventional Corn & RR1 Seed Product Guide Fall 2016 Spring 201 Why We Sell Corn Our goal at Ag Performance is to offer growers innovative financial and agronomic services. Our sales team has been trained to help you select

More information

SMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDAL CONTROL OF THE SUGARCANE BORER IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE, 2011

SMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDAL CONTROL OF THE SUGARCANE BORER IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE, 2011 SMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDAL CONTROL OF THE SUGARCANE BORER IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE, 2011 T.E. Reagan, B.E. Wilson, J.M. Beuzelin, and M.T. VanWeelden Department of Entomology, LSU AgCenter Seven

More information

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Phillip Roberts, Mike Toews, and David Buntin)

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Phillip Roberts, Mike Toews, and David Buntin) INSECT MANAGEMENT (Phillip Roberts, Mike Toews, and David Buntin) A number of insect pests are capable of severely damaging soybeans. However, it is important to realize that soybeans can withstand considerable

More information

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 12 and 13, points possible. a) The actual seeding rate for this row segment is.

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 12 and 13, points possible. a) The actual seeding rate for this row segment is. Name AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 12 and 13, 2006 100 points possible There are 15 questions plus a bonus question, each of which requires a short answer. Please be concise. Best wishes for your success!

More information

Control of both the European corn borer and corn rootworms with one application of insecticide

Control of both the European corn borer and corn rootworms with one application of insecticide Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 1967 Control of both the European corn borer and corn rootworms with one application of insecticide Ralph Eugene Munson Iowa State University Follow this and additional

More information

EC Corn Rootworm Management

EC Corn Rootworm Management University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Historical Materials from University of Nebraska- Lincoln Extension Extension 1999 EC99-1563 Corn Rootworm Management Robert

More information

Potatoes (2007) Potatoes Comparisons of Nitrogen Sources and Foliars (2008) Potatoes Nitrogen Types (2008) Potato Seed Piece Direct Fertilizer

Potatoes (2007) Potatoes Comparisons of Nitrogen Sources and Foliars (2008) Potatoes Nitrogen Types (2008) Potato Seed Piece Direct Fertilizer Potatoes Potatoes (2007) Potatoes Comparisons of Nitrogen Sources and Foliars (2008) Potatoes Nitrogen Types (2008) Potato Seed Piece Direct Fertilizer Application at Planting (2008) Experiment: Potatoes

More information

FORCE 3.0G INSECTICIDE

FORCE 3.0G INSECTICIDE Approved Pamphlet Force 2317 04-02-20 Page 1 of 6 FORCE 3.0G INSECTICIDE GROUP 3 INSECTICIDE AGRICULTURAL A SOIL-APPLIED INSECTICIDE FOR CONTROL OF CORN ROOTWORM, BLACK CUTWORM, WIREWORMS AND SEEDCORN

More information

Effect of Max-In Technology on Roundup Power Max Performance on Sugarbeet and Weeds at Mitchell, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season.

Effect of Max-In Technology on Roundup Power Max Performance on Sugarbeet and Weeds at Mitchell, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Effect of Max-In Technology on Roundup Power Max Performance on and Weeds at Mitchell, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson A field study was initiated near Mitchell, Nebraska to examine

More information

An Economic Analysis Of Corn Rootworm Management: Areawide Pest Management Versus Soil Insecticides-A Net Present Value Approach

An Economic Analysis Of Corn Rootworm Management: Areawide Pest Management Versus Soil Insecticides-A Net Present Value Approach An Economic Analysis Of Corn Rootworm Management: Areawide Pest Management Versus Soil Insecticides-A Net Present Value Approach Christina Welch Stair, Peter Quan, and Marshall A. Martin 1 1 Graduate Assistant,

More information

APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF QUADRIS FOR CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT. Jason R. Brantner and Carol E. Windels

APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF QUADRIS FOR CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT. Jason R. Brantner and Carol E. Windels APPLICATION METHOD AND RATE OF QUADRIS FOR CONTROL OF RHIOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT Jason R. Brantner and Carol E. Windels Research Fellow and Professor, respectively University of Minnesota, Northwest

More information

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 15, points possible

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 15, points possible AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III December 15, 2015 100 points possible Name There are 15 questions plus a Bonus question. Each question requires a short answer. Please be thorough yet concise and show your work where

More information

Improving Corn Water Use With Hybrid Selection: Trait evaluation for both dryland and limited irrigated systems

Improving Corn Water Use With Hybrid Selection: Trait evaluation for both dryland and limited irrigated systems Improving Corn Water Use With Hybrid Selection: Trait evaluation for both dryland and limited irrigated systems 2018 TAWC Water College, Lubbock Texas Jourdan M. Bell Texas A&M AgriLife Extension and Research

More information

RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT ON SUGARBEET FOLLOWING CORN

RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT ON SUGARBEET FOLLOWING CORN RHIZOCTONIA CROWN AND ROOT ROT ON SUGARBEET FOLLOWING CORN Jason R. Brantner 1, Mark Bredehoeft 2, Carol E. Windels 1, and Chris Dunsmore 2 1 University of Minnesota, Northwest Research and Outreach Center,

More information

Introduction: Objectives of research trial:

Introduction: Objectives of research trial: Final report, 1/3/2017 Project Title: Squash vine borer management by trap cropping and insecticides. Principal Investigator(s): Mike McFarland (Graduate student) and Celeste Welty (Associate Professor

More information

Determining the Host-Plant Resistance Mechanisms for Banded Sunflower Moth

Determining the Host-Plant Resistance Mechanisms for Banded Sunflower Moth Determining the Host-Plant Resistance Mechanisms for Banded Sunflower Moth Anitha Chirumamilla 1, Larry Charlet 2, Janet Knodel 1, and Theresa Gross 2 1 NDSU 2 USDA-ARS What is Host-plant resistance? Any

More information

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs

Imperial County Agricultural Briefs Imperial County Agricultural Briefs Features From your Farm Advisors September, 2011 Table of Contents SAMPLE OF FERTILIZERS USED ON MAJOR FIELD CROPS IN THE IMPERIAL VALLEY....... Khaled M. Bali - 2 -

More information

Tank Mixes. There are no registered tank mixes for this product. View more tank mixes info

Tank Mixes. There are no registered tank mixes for this product. View more tank mixes info Products Voliam Xpress Insecticide Uses CROPS Field corn; Seed corn; Sweet corn; FOR MANAGEMENT OF Corn earworm; European corn borer; Western bean cutworm; use info Application Information 202 ml/ac Water

More information

ACTION THRESHOLDS FOR FRESH MARKET SWEET CORN

ACTION THRESHOLDS FOR FRESH MARKET SWEET CORN ACTION THRESHOLDS FOR FRESH MARKET SWEET CORN I. WHORL STAGES Whorl-stage plants can tolerate a substantial amount of leaf and/or stem damage by ECB and FAW before the number and quality of marketable

More information

Biology of Wireworms, Baiting and. Insecticide BMPs

Biology of Wireworms, Baiting and. Insecticide BMPs Biology of Wireworms, Baiting and Brian Beaton, P.Ag. Insecticide BMPs PEI Department of Agriculture and Forestry We are not alone. Wireworm populations and damages are on the rise globally. (Ritter and

More information

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN 2018 Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN 2018 Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN 2018 Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist ENT 62 This publication was prepared as a guide for use in the selection of agricultural insecticides. It is not

More information

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] OAKES Tony Gebhardt, Dickey County, ND 58474

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] OAKES Tony Gebhardt, Dickey County, ND 58474 2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] OAKES Tony Gebhardt, Dickey County, ND 58474 Test by: Northland F.I.R.S.T., LLC, Moorhead, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / Spartan, Metribuzin,

More information

TURFGRASS AND LAWNS - CONTROL OF RED IMPORTED FIRE ANTS

TURFGRASS AND LAWNS - CONTROL OF RED IMPORTED FIRE ANTS TURFGRASS AND LAWNS - CONTROL OF RED IMPORTED FIRE ANTS General Information RESTRICTIONS Do not apply by air. Do not water the treated area to the point of run-off. Do not make applications during rain.

More information

Control of Soil Insect Pests Attacking Sweet Corn

Control of Soil Insect Pests Attacking Sweet Corn Control of Soil Insect Pests Attacking Sweet Corn H. H. Crowell H. E. Morrison Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College Corvallis Circular of Information 540 April 1954 Control of Soil Insect

More information

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato

Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium on Tuber Set, Yield, and Quality in Goldrush Potato Carl Rosen, Charles Hyatt, and Matt McNearney Dept. of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota crosen@umn.edu

More information

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] KULM Lowell Berntson, LaMoure County, ND 58456

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] KULM Lowell Berntson, LaMoure County, ND 58456 2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] KULM Lowell Berntson, LaMoure County, ND 58456 Test by: Brendemuhl Seed Research, LLC, Moorhead, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / Roundup

More information

Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley

Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley Introduction Managing Phosphorus to Optimize Potato Tuber Yield in the San Luis Valley Samuel YC Essah Assistant Professor and State Extension Specialist Colorado State University, San Luis Valley Research

More information

Onions: Onion is not ph tolerant and grows best in soil less than 7.5 ph. The trial was

Onions: Onion is not ph tolerant and grows best in soil less than 7.5 ph. The trial was Yield data on other crops being raised on permanent raised beds using SRI principles with mechanization: Report from Asif Sharif, GM, FarmAll Technology Pvt. Ltd., Lahore, Pakistan (8/1/10) asif@farmalltechnology.com

More information

7. Cabbage / AARS / Lepidoptera Foliar Trial

7. Cabbage / AARS / Lepidoptera Foliar Trial 76 7. Cabbage / AARS / Lepidoptera Foliar Trial Field applications of Venerate XC for the control of damaging lepidopteran pests on cabbage Arlington Agricultural Research Station Arlington, Wisconsin,

More information

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] JAMESTOWN Marvin Frey, Stutsman County, ND 58401

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] JAMESTOWN Marvin Frey, Stutsman County, ND 58401 2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report North Dakota Southeast [ NDSE ] JAMESTOWN Marvin Frey, Stutsman County, ND 58401 Test by: Brendemuhl Seed Research, LLC, Moorhead, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / Roundup

More information

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed

Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed USING SYSTEMIC INSECTICIDES FOR APHID CONTROL Steven R. James and Gary L. Reed Abstract Identical experiments to evaluate systemic insecticides on long-term aphid control in potatoes were planted May 13,

More information

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James '

THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES. Steven R. James ' THE EFFECTS OF MINITUBER SIZE AND HARVEST DATE ON GERMINATION, TUBER SET, AND YIELD OF RUSSET BURBANK POTATOES Steven R. James ' ABSTRACT An experiment was established in 1985 at Powell Butte to evaluate

More information

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota East Central [ MNEC ] FOLEY Milo Katke, Benton County, MN 56329

2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota East Central [ MNEC ] FOLEY Milo Katke, Benton County, MN 56329 2017 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota East Central [ MNEC ] FOLEY Milo Katke, Benton County, MN 56329 Test by: NewVenture, LLC, Ellendale, MN PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean SOIL DESCRIPTION: Mora sandy

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet 20130111a.pdf IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet Researcher(s) Gary Chastagner Affiliation: Washington State University Trial: 2012 WA Pullayup WA PhoneNumber: (253) 445-4528

More information

Radish IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Radish IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Radish IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Celeste Welty (Entomology); Bob Precheur, Mark Bennett, Doug Doohan (Horticulture & Crop Science); Sally Miller (Plant

More information

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN ENT -62 Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN ENT -62 Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN - 2019 ENT -62 Raul T. Villanueva, Extension Entomologist This publication was prepared as a guide for use in the selection of agricultural insecticides. It is not

More information

Walnut Marketing Board Final Project Report December Project Title: Irrigation Management and the Incidence of Kernel Mold in Walnut

Walnut Marketing Board Final Project Report December Project Title: Irrigation Management and the Incidence of Kernel Mold in Walnut Walnut Marketing Board Final Project Report December Project Title: Irrigation Management and the Incidence of Kernel Mold in Walnut Project Leader: Terry Prichard, Dept. of LAWR, University of California

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report Project Title: Evaluation of phytotoxicity of V-1142 on Dwarf Periwinkle (Vinca minor Bowles ) IR4 PR#: 2549 Report date: November 22, 26 Authors: Heiner Lieth and Linda Dodge Department of Plant Sciences

More information

High Tunnel Pepper Variety Trial, 2011

High Tunnel Pepper Variety Trial, 2011 High Tunnel Pepper Variety Trial, 2011 Judson Reid, Kathryn Klotzbach and Nelson Hoover Cornell Vegetable Program Introduction Peppers offer a viable option to tomatoes for commercial production in high

More information

Ditylenchus dipsaci, which proliferates in the storage

Ditylenchus dipsaci, which proliferates in the storage RESPONSES OF GARLIC TO NEMATODE SEED TREATMENT, NEMATICIDE AND TIME OF PLANTING Frederick J. Crowe Central Oregon Experiment Station Oregon State University Redmond, Oregon ABSTRACT Planting date effects

More information

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans Banded cucumber beetle 5 Bean leaf beetle 5 Beet armyworm 3 per s Treated Sevin (Carbaryl) (4) 16 oz 0.5 8 Four beetles per sweep. Karate Z (2.08) 1.28-1.60 oz 0.02-0.025 100-80 Declare (1.25) 1.02-1.28

More information

RIDOMIL GOLD 1G FUNGICIDE AGRICULTURAL

RIDOMIL GOLD 1G FUNGICIDE AGRICULTURAL Approved Bag for RIDOMIL GOLD 1G Fungicide 26612 04-03-17 Page 1 of 7 GROUP 4 FUNGICIDE RIDOMIL GOLD 1G FUNGICIDE AGRICULTURAL Systemic fungicide for the control of Cavity Spot in Carrots, Damping Off

More information

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN ENT -62 Prepared by Ric Bessin and Douglas W. Johnson, Extension Entomologists.

INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN ENT -62 Prepared by Ric Bessin and Douglas W. Johnson, Extension Entomologists. INSECTICIDE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POPCORN - 2006 ENT -62 Prepared by Ric Bessin and Douglas W. Johnson, Extension Entomologists This publication was prepared as a guide for use in the selection of agricultural

More information

At-Plant Soil Insecticide Applications: Best Management Practices for Leafy Vegetables and Cole Crops

At-Plant Soil Insecticide Applications: Best Management Practices for Leafy Vegetables and Cole Crops Technical Update From DuPont Crop Protection At-Plant Soil Insecticide Applications: Best Management Practices for Leafy Vegetables and Cole Crops For use on selected vegetables for control of labeled

More information

FACTORS AFFECTING JAPANESE BEETLE GRUB CONTROL WITH OFTANOL* AND TRIUMPH* Patricia J. Vittum University of Massachusetts, Waltham, MA

FACTORS AFFECTING JAPANESE BEETLE GRUB CONTROL WITH OFTANOL* AND TRIUMPH* Patricia J. Vittum University of Massachusetts, Waltham, MA FACTORS AFFECTING JAPANESE BEETLE GRUB CONTROL WITH OFTANOL* AND TRIUMPH* Patricia J. Vittum University of Massachusetts, Waltham, MA White grubs in general, and Japanese beetle grubs in particular, cause

More information

Soybean plant health: Foliar fungicide and insecticide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Soybean plant health: Foliar fungicide and insecticide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I. Soybean plant health: Foliar fungicide and insecticide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I. Bruce Potter, J. Irlbeck and J. Getting, University of Minnesota, Southwest Research

More information

Foliar fungicide timing and interaction with soybean maturities: Effect on soybean disease suppression and yield

Foliar fungicide timing and interaction with soybean maturities: Effect on soybean disease suppression and yield Trial: 2005 Fungicide Growth Habit Study Foliar fungicide timing and interaction with soybean maturities: Effect on soybean disease suppression and yield Bruce Potter, University of Minnesota Department

More information

Management Approaches for Thrips and Garden Symphylans in Lettuce 2

Management Approaches for Thrips and Garden Symphylans in Lettuce 2 3. REPORT: sub-report 2 Project Title Management Approaches for Thrips and Garden Symphylans in Lettuce 2 Project Investigator Dr. Shimat Villanassery Joseph IPM Entomology Advisor University of California

More information

Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Peas / Prowl, OpTill Port Byron silt loam, mod. well drained, non-irrigated. PREV. CROP/HERB: Early-Season Test

Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Peas / Prowl, OpTill Port Byron silt loam, mod. well drained, non-irrigated. PREV. CROP/HERB: Early-Season Test 2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Minnesota Southeast [ MNSE ] CANNON FALLS Hernke Inc., Marc Hernke, Goodhue County, MN 55009 Test by: IMQ, LLC, New Richland, MN Peas / Prowl, OpTill Port Byron silt

More information

EFFECTS OF TANK MIXES OF ROUNDUP WITH FUNGICIDES AND INSECTICIDES ON ROUNDUP READY SOYBEANS

EFFECTS OF TANK MIXES OF ROUNDUP WITH FUNGICIDES AND INSECTICIDES ON ROUNDUP READY SOYBEANS EFFECTS OF TANK MIXES OF ROUNDUP WITH FUNGICIDES AND INSECTICIDES ON ROUNDUP READY SOYBEANS Jarrod T. Hardke, Gus M. Lorenz, Adam Chappell, Craig Shelton University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service,

More information

Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation

Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation Lesco Fertilizer Evaluation Dr. James T. Midcap Department of Horticulture The University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602 Nature of Work: Lesco=s 18-6-12 Experimental urea formaldehyde fertilizer with minors

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet 20150415c.pdf IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet Researcher(s) Nora J Catlin Trial: 2014 NY Affiliation: Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffol 423 Griffing Avenue Riverhead

More information

Trap Design and Bait Longevity Experiments for Managing Spotted Wing Drosophila

Trap Design and Bait Longevity Experiments for Managing Spotted Wing Drosophila Trap Design and Bait Longevity Experiments for Managing Spotted Wing Drosophila Chris Castro, Rebekah Jackson, Ashlynn Johnson, Randy Lee, and Mark Salser All are members of Snohomish County Fruit Society,

More information

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER

POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER POTATO VARIETY RESPONSE TO PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER Mike Thornton 1, Deron Beck 1, Jeff Stark 2 and Bryan Hopkins 3 1 University of Idaho, Parma Research and Extension Center 2 University of Idaho, Idaho

More information

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1

Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1 Effect of Method of Application of Double Superphosphate on the Yield and Phosphorus Uptake by Sugar Beets 1 W. E. LARSON 2 Optimum phosphate fertilizer placement for sugar beets is probably dependent

More information

Insect Pests of Potato Tubers

Insect Pests of Potato Tubers I Press or radio announcement i Ibudetiri < ' APR Insect Pests of Potato Tubers H. E. Morrison H. H. Crowell Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College Corvallis Circular of Infownafion 538 April

More information

CRP Conversion: Missouri

CRP Conversion: Missouri Water Resources: BIOEN3 Issues & Opportunities in March 2012 Bioenergy Generation Factsheet 3.2.5 CRP Conversion: Missouri As CRP contracts expire, producers must decide whether to renew the contract or

More information

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Cycocel (Chlormequat Chloride) for Growth Control of Sweet Potato Vine (Ipomoea batatas Tricolor )

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Cycocel (Chlormequat Chloride) for Growth Control of Sweet Potato Vine (Ipomoea batatas Tricolor ) toxicity and Efficacy of Cycocel (Chlormequat Chloride) for Growth Control of Sweet Potato Vine (Ipomoea batatas Tricolor ) By Heiner Lieth, Director Linda Dodge Shannon Still Ron Lane Jackie Bergquist

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report Project Title: Evaluation of phytotoxicity of Sulfentrazone on American Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis Emerald Green ) IR4 PR#: 25362 Report date: November 21, 26 Authors: Heiner Lieth and Linda Dodge

More information

Crop Management Details Start from Parameters settings Emergence Planting Seed brand: Settings Parameter settings Hybrid-specific Generic

Crop Management Details Start from Parameters settings Emergence Planting Seed brand: Settings Parameter settings Hybrid-specific Generic 2.3.4. Crop Management Details Start from: A Hybrid-Maize simulation can start from either planting or emergence. Make that choice and select the appropriate date from the month/date boxes on the right.

More information

MANAGING STALK ROTS FACTORS LEADING TO STALK ROTS

MANAGING STALK ROTS FACTORS LEADING TO STALK ROTS MANAGING STALK ROTS FACTORS LEADING TO STALK ROTS Symptoms of crown rot were observed throughout fields across SE MN in 2014. Many plants were stunted and yellowed even with relatively mild crown decay.

More information

Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels

Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels Potassium Applications and Yellow Shoulder Disorder of Tomatoes in High Tunnels Elizabeth T. Maynard, Israel S. Calsoyas, and Jill Malecki, Purdue University, P.O. Box 1759, Valparaiso, IN 46384 emaynard@purdue.edu

More information

Test not planted due to persistent wet soil

Test not planted due to persistent wet soil 2013 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Wisconsin Central [ WICE ] TAYLOR Jeff Guza, Jackson County, WI 54659 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. NCB, Inc., Lanark, IL PREV. CROP/HERB: Corn / Capreno, Atrazine, Roundup

More information

BOLLGARD 3 RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP)

BOLLGARD 3 RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP) BOLLGARD 3 RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (RMP) RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Resistance Management Plan is based on three basic principles: (1) minimising the exposure of Helicoverpa spp. to the Bacillus

More information

Update on Root Rot Research: Aphanomyces and Rhizoctonia

Update on Root Rot Research: Aphanomyces and Rhizoctonia Update on Root Rot Research: Aphanomyces and Rhizoctonia Carol E. Windels & Jason R. Brantner University of Minnesota NW Res. & Outreach Ctr., Crookston 2011 Sugarbeet samples (183 total) Number of fields

More information

2016 Tillage Radish Planting Date x Seeding Rate Trial

2016 Tillage Radish Planting Date x Seeding Rate Trial 2016 Tillage Radish Planting Date x Seeding Rate Trial Dr. Heather Darby, UVM Extension Agronomist Nate Brigham, Erica Cummings Hillary Emick, Abha Gupta, and Sara Ziegler University of Vermont Crops and

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report Project Title: Evaluation of phytotoxicity of V-1142 on American Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis Emerald Green ) IR4 PR#: 25396 Report date: November 21, 26 Authors: Heiner Lieth and Linda Dodge Department

More information

Prionus root borer: biology, behavior and management. Angelita L. Acebes-Doria Tree Nut Entomology University of Georgia - Tifton

Prionus root borer: biology, behavior and management. Angelita L. Acebes-Doria Tree Nut Entomology University of Georgia - Tifton Prionus root borer: biology, behavior and management Angelita L. Acebes-Doria Tree Nut Entomology University of Georgia - Tifton Foliage Feeders Aphids, Mites, Phylloxera, Leaffeeding caterpillars Nut

More information

North American Bramble Growers Research Foundation. Grit Weeding to Efficiently Control Weed Populations in Primocane-Fruiting Raspberries

North American Bramble Growers Research Foundation. Grit Weeding to Efficiently Control Weed Populations in Primocane-Fruiting Raspberries North American Bramble Growers Research Foundation Grit Weeding to Efficiently Control Weed Populations in Primocane-Fruiting Raspberries Principal Investigators: Steve Poppe 1, Mary Rogers 2, Frank Forcella

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet 20161206e.pdf IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet Researcher(s) Nora J Catlin Trial: 2015 NY Affiliation: Cornell Cooperative Extension of Suffol 423 Griffing Avenue Riverhead

More information

MANAGEMENT OF DISEASES ON COTTON AND SOYBEAN,

MANAGEMENT OF DISEASES ON COTTON AND SOYBEAN, MANAGEMENT OF DISEASES ON COTTON AND SOYBEAN, 1999 ENTOMOLOGY AND PLANT PATHOLOGY DEPARTMENTAL SERIES NO. 2 MARCH 2000 ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION LUTHER WATERS, DIRECTOR AUBURN UNIVERSITY

More information

Guidelines for Managing Onion Thrips on Onion

Guidelines for Managing Onion Thrips on Onion Cornell University Cooperative Extension provides equal program and employment opportunities. Please contact our office if you have any special needs. Guidelines for Managing Onion Thrips on Onion By Brian

More information

Biology and Control of the Sugarbeet Root Maggot in the Red River Valley Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports.

Biology and Control of the Sugarbeet Root Maggot in the Red River Valley Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports. iology and Control of the Sugarbeet Root Maggot in the Red River Valley - 2002 2002 Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports. Volume 33, Page 134-152 IOLOGY AND CONTROL OF THE SUGAREET ROOT MAGGOT IN THE

More information

Pepper IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Pepper IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Pepper IPM Elements Revised March, 2012 Edited by Jim Jasinski Contributing Authors: Celeste Welty (Entomology); Bob Precheur, Mark Bennett, Doug Doohan (Horticulture & Crop Science); Sally Miller (Plant

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report Project Title: Evaluation of phytotoxicity of Sedgehammer (Halosulfuron) on Dwarf Periwinkle (Vinca minor Bowles ) IR4 PR#: 2517 Report date: November 2, 26 Authors: Heiner Lieth and Linda Dodge Department

More information

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Missouri Central [ MOCE ] SWEET SPRINGS Bruce Strobel, Saline County, MO 64020

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Missouri Central [ MOCE ] SWEET SPRINGS Bruce Strobel, Saline County, MO 64020 2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Missouri Central [ MOCE ] SWEET SPRINGS Bruce Strobel, Saline County, MO 64020 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / XtendiMax SOIL

More information

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Missouri Central [ MOCE ] ORCHARD FARM Scott Boschert, St. Charles County, MO 63301

2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Missouri Central [ MOCE ] ORCHARD FARM Scott Boschert, St. Charles County, MO 63301 2018 Corn Grain Top 30 Harvest Report Missouri Central [ MOCE ] ORCHARD FARM Scott Boschert, St. Charles County, MO 63301 Test by: F.I.R.S.T. MSR, Inc., Columbia, MO PREV. CROP/HERB: Soybean / Blanket,

More information

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system

Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system Evaluation of grafting for the mature green tomato production system Brenna Aegerter Scott Stoddard UCCE San Joaquin Co. UCCE Merced Co. University of California Cooperative Extension Minghua Zhang & Mike

More information

David G. Hall Research Department United States Sugar Corporation P.O. Drawer 1207 Clewiston, FL ABSTRACT

David G. Hall Research Department United States Sugar Corporation P.O. Drawer 1207 Clewiston, FL ABSTRACT Hall: Laboratory Screening of Insecticides for Preventing Injury by the Wireworm Melanotus Communis (Coleoptera : Elateridae) to Germinating Sugarcane LABORATORY SCREENING OF INSECTICIDES FOR PREVENTING

More information

SOIL TEST HANDBOOK FOR GEORGIA

SOIL TEST HANDBOOK FOR GEORGIA SOIL TEST HANDBOOK FOR GEORGIA Georgia Cooperative Extension College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences The University of Georgia Athens, Georgia 30602-9105 EDITORS: David E. Kissel Director, Agricultural

More information