CALEDON EAST COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY. Background and Assessments Report

Transcription

1 CALEDON EAST COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY Background and Assessments Report Final Draft May 14, 2013

2

3 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Table of Contents 1. Introduction Purpose of the Study Process Purpose of this Report The Study Area Legislation and Policy Review Planning Act Other Applicable Legislation Provincial Policy Provincial Plans Oak Ridges Moraine Plan Greenbelt Plan Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe Peel Region Official Plan Town of Caledon Official Plan Land Use Plan Community Improvement Policies Zoning By law Town Design Guidelines and Streetscape Studies Caledon East Streetscape Study Architectural Guidelines (1994) and Design Concept (1994) Caledon East Community Design and Architectural Design Guidelines (2000) Industrial and Commercial Design Guidelines Peel Region Active Transportation Plan Region of Peel Streetscaping Guidelines Peel Regional Road Characterization Study Peel Region Healthy Communities Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study i

4 Peel Healthy Development Index Report (2009) Health Background Study: Development of a Health Background Study Framework (May 2011) The Healthy Development Index Recommendations Report (October 2011) City and Regional Residential Preferences Study Changing Course: Creating Environments for Healthy Living in Peel Healthy Canada by Design SWOT Analysis Other Approaches to Community Revitalization Bolton Community Improvement Plan Downtown Perth Community Improvement Plan Haldimand County Downtown Areas Community Improvement Plan Chatham Kent Downtown and Main Street Areas Community Improvement Plan New Tecumseth Community Improvement Plan Lessons Learned Consultation Stakeholder Meeting Advisory Committee Meeting Public Open House and Workshop Future Consultation Basis for the Community Improvement Plan Critical Needs and Guiding Principles Incentive Program Options Eligibility for Incentives Municipal Leadership Program Options Conclusion and Next Steps FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

5 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper 1. Introduction Caledon East is a picturesque rural community, located in the heart of Caledon s rural landscape and at the edges of the Niagara Escarpment and Oak Ridges Moraine. The community thrives as the Town s administrative centre, and as one of the Town s focal points for growth. However, there is tremendous potential to revitalize the community s historic core and to achieve a unified vision for the community s public realm. To accomplish these goals, the Town of Caledon and the Region of Peel have initiated the preparation of a community improvement plan for the community of Caledon East. A community improvement plan is a tool that enables a wide range of programs intended to support revitalization and private investment, including grants for private property owners and tenants, as well as municipal property acquisition and improvements. The Town and the Region have retained the services of MMM Group Limited to assist in the completion of this important study. 1.1 Purpose of the Study A community improvement plan is being prepared to promote the revitalization and improvement of Caledon East. A community improvement plan can enable the Town to offer financial incentives to property owners and tenants who wish to make improvements to their property. Additionally, a community improvement plan can plan a strategy for municipal leadership in community revitalization, such as streetscape improvements, additional design studies, or other activities. Above: Photos of Caledon gateway and Caledon Trailway/Centreville Creek Caledon East is guided by a number of planning documents, including a detailed Secondary Plan, which plans for compatible redevelopment in the community s core, encourages conservation of historic buildings, and supports continued revitalization and improvement. In many respects, the community improvement plan is an essential tool for achieving the goals of the Secondary Plan, since a community improvement plan can encourage investments in the building stock, including compatible redevelopment. Additionally, the community improvement plan can help to implement applicable design guidelines, by requiring compliance with the guidelines to be eligible for financial incentives. The Plan has the potential to bring together the numerous plans, guidelines, projects and goals, and establish a clear and coordinated implementation strategy. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 1

6 A community improvement plan is prepared for an area designated by the Town as a community improvement project area. The community improvement project area and the plan are prepared and adopted in accordance with the Planning Act for Ontario. The plan will also need to have consideration for the policies of the Town of Caledon s Official Plan, and other policies, guidelines and regulations that impact the revitalization of the community and improvement of quality of life and healthy living. The Town of Caledon has already approved and implemented a Community Improvement Plan for Bolton, which includes a number of financial incentives which are available to property owners. The Caledon East Community Improvement Plan is considered a separate study, which will be Caledon s second community improvement plan. It will be important that the plan specifically address the needs and issues of the community. While there may be administrative tie ins between the Caledon East and Bolton Plans, the Caledon East Plan should be specific to the context and circumstances of the community. 1.2 Process A community improvement plan functions as an integrated community planning, economic development and urban design tool. It should be based on a thorough planning analysis, inclusive of a transparent consultation process with multiple opportunities for public and stakeholder engagement. The incentives offered to the community and other implementation programs and projects should directly relate to the community s needs, issues and opportunities, so that they may be effectively utilized. The process for preparing the community improvement plan was broadly outlined in the Terms of Reference for this study, and refined through initial discussions between Town staff and the consulting team. The final process consists of the following steps: 1. Preparation of the Background Data Assessments and Discussion Paper (this report); 2. Initial consultation with the public and stakeholders (a public/stakeholder open house and workshop); 3. Initial consultation with Council; 4. Preparation of a draft Community Improvement Plan, including a plan for marketing the Community Improvement Plan; 5. Further consultation with the public and stakeholders; 6. A workshop with Council to discuss the draft Community Improvement Plan programs; FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

7 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper 7. Finalization of the Community Improvement Plan, based on consultation and input; and 8. A public meeting required by the Planning Act and adoption of the Plan by Council. Upon completion of the Community Improvement Plan, the Town will assume responsibilities for implementing the plan, including funding the programs and administration of any financial incentives in the Plan. 1.3 Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is to establish a foundation for preparing the community improvement plan. This report identifies the issues and opportunities which should be addressed through a community improvement plan, and describes how a community improvement can be used to benefit and revitalize Caledon East. It is the intent of this report to help answer the following questions: What are the legislation, policies, studies and regulations that are relevant to preparing a community improvement plan? How can a community improvement plan complement or help to implement these studies? What are Caledon East s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, especially with regard to the matters that could be addressed by a community improvement plan? This may include matters such as: Urban design, built form and streetscapes; Building and property condition; Walkability and active transportation; Amenities, business mix; Heritage conservation; Housing availability and affordability; and Transportation and parking. What are Caledon East s critical needs the key issues and opportunities that should be addressed through a community improvement plan? What types of incentive programs and municipal leadership strategies should the Town utilize through a community improvement plan, to help address the community s critical needs? Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 3

8 2. The Study Area Caledon East is a small urban community located in the geographic heart of the Town of Caledon. The centre of the community is located about 15 km from Downtown Bolton and about 12 km from the northern edge of Brampton s urban area. The geographic context is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 Study Area FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

9 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper According to the Architectural Guidelines: Caledon East Streetscape Study (February 1994), the growth of Caledon East occurred in three distinctive phases: Once land began to be settled for agricultural uses in the period between 1820 and 1850, the hamlet was likely established due to the convergence of the stream, Airport Road and Old Church Road, as well as the valley setting. Few buildings in Caledon East remain from this era. According to the Town s list of historical properties, only a few properties around this era remain. The properties include Airport Road ( ), the St. James Anglican Cemetery at Innis Lake Road (prior to 1850), the James Watson farmhouse at Airport Road ( ), the Cranston Freeborn House at 9 Antrium Court ( ), a farmhouse at 89 Walker Road West ( ), the Orange Lodge property at 1 Greer Street (prior to 1850), and the Knox Presbyterian Church at Airport Road ( ). Additional growth took place when the connection to the Hamilton and North Western Railway was completed, meaning that goods could be more easily shipped. A number of buildings from this period, between 1870 and 1914, remain. These buildings include primarily houses, but several churches, farmhomes, barns, commercial buildings, and a school have survived from this era. The buidings are located on Old Church Road, Airport Road, Mountainview Road, Antrim Court, McCaffery Lane, Walker Road West, Parsons Avenue, Emma Street, Dufferin Street and Maple Street. Significant additional growth did not take place until the 1950s, coinciding with rapid growth of the Greater Toronto Area in general and improvements to the highway network and roadways. The development character of this period is similar to other communities, with some automobile oriented commercial development and housing subdivisions. Above: Historic photos of Caledon East, circa 1910 (top), 1915 (upper middle), 1930 (lower middle), and aerial photo of Caledon Trailway and Airport Road area in 1969 Land continues to be developed and is anticipated to continue in the future in Caledon East. New residential subdivisions have been built on the north and south sides of Walker Road, at the northwest corner of the community. Several new streets and residential uses are being constructed on the north side of Old Church Road. Projections about future growth are discussed in Section 2 of this report. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 5

10 Caledon East is distinguished by its location in a valley and its woodland surroundings. Caledon East is located at the junction of the Oak Ridges Moraine, Niagara Escarpment and the Peel Plain. Woodlands surround the community to the north, west and southeast. The east west Centreville Creek corridor, including the Caledon Trailway, bisects the community just south of the core area. The corridor forms a connection between the woodlands to the west with the woodlands further to the south east of the community. These woodlands form clear edges to Caledon East s urban area in the north, west and southeast. The boundaries of Caledon East to the east and south are not as sharply defined. Rather, there is a transition between the urbanized community into the rural landscape. The outskirts of the community include several estate residential subdivisions on the southwest, south and north/northeast sides. The Old Church Road corridor and Airport Road corridor transitions into a mix of rural land uses, agriculture, and rural residential lots. As Old Church Road and Airport Road are Regional roads, it will be important to collaborate with the Region on community revitalization solutions. Caledon East functions as an important administrative centre in the Town of Caledon. The Town s municipal office, as well as the Caledon East Community Complex, are located on Old Church Road, east of the historic core. A fire hall and a former Ontario Provincial Police facility are also located on Old Church Road. The community has two elementary schools (Caledon East Public School and St. Cornelius Catholic School) and one secondary school, Robert F. Hall Catholic Secondary School. St. Cornelius Catholic and Robert F. Hall Catholic Secondary School are located close to the Town s municipal offices, on the north side of Old Church Road, while Caledon East Public School is accessed from Airport Road and Jean Street, just south of the historic core. The core of the Town is generally located along Airport Road, extending from the Caledon Trailway to just north of Old Church Road. The buildings in the core consist mainly of one and two storey buildings. The built form character is best described as a small town or village main street, with some gabled roofs, and lack of a continuous street wall, as most buildings have a driveway on one side, and some buildings have parking in the side yard. The front yard setbacks of buildings vary, though most buildings are located close to the sidewalk. A few newer commercial buildings are setback substantially from the sidewalk, with parking in front. This variety of character creates challenges in terms of defining a very clear vision for community improvement. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited Above: Centreville Creek at Airport Road, looking east (top), Old Church Road looking east (upper middle), Airport Road looking west (lower middle) and Caledon East Gateawy at Airport Road, looking north (bottom)

11 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper There is substantial vegetation in the streetscape, especially south of Old Church Road, where there are maturing trees planted in the street and planted in landscape strips in front yards. Pedestrian amenities include some street furniture, including a few trash receptacles, benches and planters, as well as a few signs with educational information about community heritage. The overhead utility wires are located on the east side of Airport Road. Street light fixtures are provided consistently along Airport Road and Old Church Road. The core area includes mostly commercial tenants, as indicated in Figure 2. The businesses shown to the south are the highway commercial plaza, which includes the Foodland store. There are two existing development proposals, related to vacant properties at the corner of Airport Road and Old Church Road, and further to the north on Old Church Road. Figure 2 Business Mix in the Core Area of Caledon East, as of April 2011 (source: Province of Ontario) Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 7

12 3. Legislation and Policy Review 3.1 Planning Act The Ontario Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, is the key piece of legislation for regulating community planning in Ontario. It outlines the tools, methods and procedures that municipalities use to manage land use planning and development in Ontario s municipalities. Section 28 of the Planning Act allows municipalities to prepare and adopt community improvement plans for designated community improvement project areas. The Act states that municipalities may pass a by law to designate a community improvement project area, provided that the municipality has an Official Plan in effect which has policies regarding community improvement in the municipality. The community improvement project area may apply to the entirety of the municipality or to just a portion of the municipality (Section 28(2)). Where a community improvement project area has been designated by bylaw, Council may: a) acquire land with the approval of a minister, where a community improvement plan is not in effect (Minister approval is not required if a community improvement plan is in effect) (Section 28(3)(a)); b) hold land that has been acquired (Section 28(3)(b)); c) clear, grade or otherwise prepare land for community improvement (Section 28(3)(c)); or d) prepare and adopt a community improvement plan (Subsection 28(4)). The community improvement plan may be used by the municipality to: a) construct, repair, rehabilitate or improve buildings or land in conformity with the community improvement plan, and sell, lease or dispose of such buildings and land in the community improvement project area (28(6)(a)); FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

13 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper b) sell, lease or dispose of land acquired or held by the municipality in the community improvement project area to any person for use which conforms to the community improvement plan (28(6)(b)); c) make grants or loans to registered owners, assessed owners or tenants of land and buildings in the community improvement project area to pay for the whole or any part of the eligible costs of the community improvement plan (28(7)). Eligible costs include costs for conducting environmental site assessments, environmental remediation, as well as the development, redevelopment, construction, and reconstruction of land and buildings for rehabilitation purposes or for the provision of energy efficient uses, buildings, structures, works, improvements or facilities (28(7.1)). Note that the total amount of grants and loans and any tax assistance as defined in Section of the Municipal Act, 2001, must not exceed the value of eligible costs (28(7.3)). Agreements for loans and grants issued under Subsection 28(7) may be subject to registration against the land, so that the municipality can enforce the provisions of the agreement to subsequent owners and tenants, subject to the Registry Act and Land Titles Act. d) make grants or loans for repairs, where an owner does not comply with and has been given an order under Section 15.2(2) of the Building Code Act to repair their building or clear their land (32(1)). Note that in this case, loans are subject to the provisions of 32(2) and 32(3), which set out requirements for collection of taxes through municipal tax collection and registration of certificate of loan to the land registry office; and e) enter into agreements with any governmental authority or agency for the completion or implementation of studies, plans and programs (with Minster approval) or enter into similar agreements with other municipalities (Minister approval not required). The tools that can be utilized by a municipality in conformity with a community improvement plan above are very broad. The Planning Act specifies that municipal decisions regarding land acquisition and property improvements must be in conformity with the adopted community improvement plan, meaning that the community improvement plan should establish clear policies and guidelines for the use of these tools. It is interpreted that the powers to issue grants and loans applies to a very wide range of issues, given that eligible costs broadly include development, redevelopment, construction and reconstruction of lands and buildings for Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 9

14 rehabilitation purposes. It is intended that the Official Plan can more specifically outline the intended use of community improvement plans, which can be further refined by the community improvement plan itself. Some municipalities have broadly interpreted the application of Subsection 28(7) to include tax increment equivalent grants. If a property owner s tax assessment is expected to increase due to eligible community improvement activities (i.e., the tax increment), the value of that tax increment is granted to the owner after the full taxes are paid, inclusive of the tax increment. The municipality may choose to grant the tax increment over a number of years, usually in decreasing amounts each year. This program is intended to overcome the notion that tax assessment increases are a barrier to development or redevelopment. The rebates give the owner time to adjust to the new tax assessment, where the assessment as increased as a result of their development project. 3.2 Other Applicable Legislation Section of the Municipal Act allows municipalities to pass by laws to cancel, reduce or refund taxes levied for local municipal and school purposes for eligible properties. Municipalities are required to give notice of this decision to the Regional municipality, who may choose to provide a similar cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes which are levied by the upper tier municipality. However, this applies only to properties classified in the residential property class, the farm property class or the managed forests class, which typically would not apply to a community improvement plan. Therefore, this potential program should not be considered as a potential incentive program for the Caledon East Community Improvement Plan. Similarly, under subsection 365.1(1) taxes may be cancelled by by law for properties which are considered to be contaminated (i.e., a phase two environmental site assessment has been conducted and which did not meet the standards specified under Section 168.4(1) of the Environmental Protection Act). In order for the taxes to be cancelled, the property must be included in a community improvement project area, and the community improvement plan must contain provisions to enable this tax assistance. Additionally, in order to provide tax assistance for the portion of taxes used for school purposes, approval from the Minister of Finance must be obtained (365.1(6)). The municipality may outline conditions respecting the tax assistance, which, if not met, may become payable to the municipality (365.1(3.1)). The municipality is required to issue notice of tax cancellation to the upper tier municipality, who may choose to cancel upper tier taxes. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

15 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper This program is typically known as the Brownfields Financial Tax Incentive Program. Under Section of the Municipal Act, a program for tax reductions or refunds may be developed for eligible heritage properties, including properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act or Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act (i.e., within a heritage conservation district), and which are subject to an easement agreement with the municipality (under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act) Ontario Heritage Foundation (under Section 22 of the Ontario Heritage Act), or another agreement with the municipality respecting its maintenance and preservation. The municipality may outline additional eligibility criteria to define properties eligible for tax reductions or refunds. Other requirements under Section will apply. This program is often called the Heritage Property Tax Relief Program and is often integrated in community improvement plans. Under Section 39 of the Ontario Heritage Act, municipalities may pass bylaws providing grants or loans to the owner of a heritage property designated under Part IV of the Act, to assist in paying for the alteration of the property on the terms described by the by law. Occasionally, municipalities implement this program through a community improvement plan. If such a program is not incorporated in the community improvement plan, it should be coordinated with the plan, to ensure there is no overlap in grants. The Town has implemented such a program, which provides for matching grants of up to 50% of eligible costs, to a maximum of $4,000 per project, and subject to funding availability. Three of seven designated properties in Caledon East have received grants under this program, including Airport Road the Cranston Moses Graham House, 9 Antrium Court the Cranston Freeborn House, and 15 Emma Street the St. James Parsonage/Rectory home. Some municipalities have incorporated programs to reduce, cancel or refund fees for planning applications. This is sometimes based in part on Section 69(2) of the Planning Act, which permits council, committee of adjustment or planning board to reduce or waive the requirement of a fee where it is determined that payment would be unreasonable. A planning fee refund program may also be viewed as an interpretation of the eligible costs under Section 28(7) of the Planning Act. Most municipalities that have implemented this program fund the fee refund from the annual budget for community improvement plan incentive programs, so that expected revenues from planning fees can be maintained. Similarly, municipalities have interpreted this as a basis for refunding development charges or building permit fees. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 11

16 3.3 Provincial Policy Under Section 3(1) of the Planning Act, the Province may issue policy statements on municipal planning matters considered to be of Provincial interest. Decisions by the municipality are to be consistent with the policy statements (5(1)). The current Provincial Policy Statement came into effect on March 1, Provincial Policy Statement Cover Policy promotes the regeneration of settlement areas. Policy states that planning authorities are to promote opportunities for intensification and redevelopment, including brownfield redevelopment. Healthy and active communities should be promoted by facilitation of pedestrian movement and cycling, and providing for a full range of accessible recreation opportunities (Policy 1.5.1). The revitalization of main streets is promoted by Policy 1.7.1(b). Section 2.1 provides policies respecting the long term protection of natural features and areas. Policy requires that significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes are to be conserved. The PPS therefore supports the maintenance and revitalization of Caledon East, which could include the use of a Community Improvement Plan to, for example: Promote the economic viability of the main street area; Promote opportunities for appropriate intensification and redevelopment; Help conserve cultural heritage resources; Help promote protection of natural heritage features; and Promote or create new active transportation and recreational opportunities. The Province is currently undertaking a five year review of the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement, which is required by Subsection 3(10) of the Planning Act. The draft policies build on the policies of the 2005 Provincial Policy Statement, and are intended to provide clearer direction to municipalities. There are no specific new policies regarding community revitalization. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

17 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper 3.4 Provincial Plans Oak Ridges Moraine Plan Caledon East in the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan The Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Act, S.O. 2001, provided the basis for preparing the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan, which went into effect in The Plan is intended to protect the Oak Ridges moraine, a significant landform which has important environmental, geological and hydrological features and performs important ecological functions. Municipal planning decisions are to conform to the Plan. Caledon East is located at the western edge of the Oak Ridges Moraine (see image at right). A portion of the community is not located in the Moraine. Lands to the north, west and southeast of the community are designated Natural Core Area. Lands further to the south and small portions of lands to the north are designated Natural Linkage Area. The built up area of the community is designated a mix of Settlement Area, while the fringe areas including some of the estate subdivisions are designated Countryside Area. Natural Core Areas represent lands with a concentration of natural heritage features and are critical to the overall integrity of the Moraine. Natural Linkage Areas represent open spaces, natural features, rivers and streams that connect Core Areas. Countryside Areas transition between settlements, Natural Core Areas and Natural Linkage Areas. Settlement Areas include existing and planned urban areas, which are planned by Official Plans. The community improvement plan will focus on the revitalization, regeneration and improvement of the existing Settlement Area. Subsection 18(1) of the Plan intends to focus and contain urban growth by promoting the efficient use of land, including intensification and redevelopment, and minimizing the encroachment and impact of development on ecological functions and hydrological features of the Plan Area. It is intended that official plans will guide land use and growth management in Settlement Areas. The Plan also promotes improvement of natural heritage features and functions, and accommodates a trail system (Subsection 18(2)). Caledon East in the Greenbelt Plan Greenbelt Plan Like the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan, the Greenbelt Plan (2005) is a Provincial Plan and municipal decisions must conform to the Plan. Caledon East is Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 13

18 located within the Greenbelt Plan Area (see image at left). Much of the community is designated Towns and Villages, while a portion of the Community falls within the Oak Ridges Moraine Area, because it is subject to the Oak Ridges Moraine Plan. Lands on the south side of the community is designated Protected Countryside by the Greenbelt Plan. The following policies apply: Towns and Villages are subject to the policies of These settlements, including Caledon East are intended to be governed principally by the municipal official plan, and are only subject to the policies for external connections in 3.2.5, which promotes the maintenance and improvement of connections between natural heritage features and ecological/hydrological functions and processes. Within the Protected Countryside, lands are intended to support agricultural uses, but a range of non agricultural uses which support the resource/agricultural sectors or recreational activities are supported (Section 4.0) Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2006) outlines a policy framework for managing growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The plan is intended to be complementary to the policies of the Greenbelt Plan. The Growth Plan generally encourages the development of complete communities, higher density development where appropriate, and promoting and requiring a certain amount of intensification (Section 2.2.2). The plan recognizes that Rural Settlement areas are the key to the vitality and economic well being of rural communities, and municipalities are encouraged to plan for a variety of cultural and economic opportunities within rural settlement areas to serve the needs of rural residents and businesses. Caledon East in the Region of Peel s Structure Plan (Schedule D of the Offiical Plan) 3.5 Peel Region Official Plan The Peel Region Official Plan (November 2008 Office Consolidation) provides guidance on matters such as management of resources, land use structure, infrastructure and development policies. It is intended that municipal official plans are to be in conformity with the Region s Official Plan. The Plan promotes restoration of the natural environment (section 2.5) and conservation of heritage resources (section 3.6). It identifies a Greenlands System, which incorporates the Centreville Creek corridor and woodlands surrounding Caledon East. Caledon East is designated as one of FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

19 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper three Rural Service Centres in the Region, and is located in the heart of the Rural System (see image at right). It is intended that growth in the Rural System will be focused in the Rural Service Centres, and a wide range of uses and activities are contemplated for these settlements (section 5.4.3). Regional Official Plan Amendment 26 (included in the February 2013 Office Consolidation) provides polices regarding community improvement plans. It is intended that plans may address Regional infrastructure, intensification in association with transit, affordable housing and other matters as prescribed by the Province. Specific policies regarding incentives for intensification are under appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board. 3.6 Town of Caledon Official Plan The Town of Caledon Official Plan (December 31, 2008 Consolidation) guides municipal decision making with respect to land use, growth and change Land Use Plan Caledon East is designated as a Rural Service Centre, meaning that Caledon East is intended to be a focus of growth and service provision in the central part of the Town of Caledon (Section ). Caledon East is subject to a Comprehensive Secondary Plan (Section 7.7), and the land use is shown in Schedule D (Figure 3). It is intended that growth will be permitted in Caledon East, while recognizing its rural setting and role as the Town s administrative centre. It is the objective of the plan to promote compact development, to strengthen the commercial core, to protect cultural resources, and encourage pedestrian activity. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 15

20 Figure 3 Land Use Plan for Caledon East (Schedule D, Caledon Official Plan) Growth in Caledon East is intended to increase the population to 6,400 before Further development will occur between 2016 and 2021, increasing the population to 8,400. With regard to community design, the Secondary Plan for Caledon East intends that the commercial core consist of a traditional main street. The Streetscape Concept and Architectural Guidelines are adopted to guide the redevelopment of the Commercial Core. Outside of the Commercial Core, mixed use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor and residential units above will be considered on Old Church Road and Airport Road, but the buildings and lots will be residential in character. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

21 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper The land use plan illustrates Caledon East s planned community structure, permitted land uses and other general policies regarding infrastructure, development and urban design. The Commercial Core Area is considered to include properties on Airport Road, south of Walker Road, extending to the Caledon Trailway in the south. This includes both existing commercial uses in the core area, as well as some homes and apartments further north on Airport Road. The land is designated General Commercial. Permitted uses include a variety of commercial uses with the exception of automotive related uses and drivethrough restaurants ( ). The redevelopment of this area is encouraged ( ). Policy supports the designation of a Business Improvement Area for Caledon East s commercial area. A portion of the Commercial Core Area, south of Old Church Road, is identified as a Flood Potential Study Area. The study is currently being finalized by the Town. At this time, it is anticipated that development may not be permitted in the high risk flood area. The Flood Risk Study will need to be reviewed in relation to the Community Improvement Plan. The area between the Commercial Core Area and South Commercial Area is designated low density residential on the west side of Airport Road and Special Use Area on the east side of Airport Road (refer to the discussion on Special Use Areas below). Currently, these lands are used for single detached homes. A South Commercial Area is identified on the east side of Airport Road in the south side of the community, and is also designated General Commercial. This is the existing highway commercial plaza, including the Foodland and other retail stores. It is intended that retail commercial uses will solely be located in the Commercial Core and the South Commercial Area ( ). Permitted uses are the same as the Commercial Core Area. The institutional designation includes the Town s places of worship, located near the Commercial Core Area, as well as the Town s schools and administrative facilities. The Caledon East Community Complex and associated outdoor recreational facilities are designated Open Space/Institutional Policy Area. Planned future development is designated as Policy Area Residential, inclusive of conceptual future roadways. These areas are located at the far northwest and far northeast corners of the community. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 17

22 Special study areas are located at the northeast of the Community on the north side of Old Church Road and on the east side of Airport Road at the north end of the community. The former is subject to further environmental studies, to determine development constraints. The latter block is being set aside to be considered for parks and recreational purposes, depending on future needs. Four Special Use Areas are also identified on the Plan (refer to Figure 3), and subject to the following: Allison s Grove (A): This area is intended to be an attractive gateway, which will complement the existing designated heritage residence on the site. Airport Road (B): This area includes commercial uses in existing residences. It is intended that future land use changes will not be permitted until a more comprehensive study addressing the transition of this area into a mixed commercial/residential district can be completed. Community Focus Area (C): This area is intended to accommodate a public gathering place which will complement the Town s administrative centre and surrounding open space. Permitted uses will include mixed use buildings up to three storeys. A maximum of 650 square metres of retail commercial use is permitted in this area. Old Church Road (D): Residential uses, small scale office and personal services will be permitted, but retail uses will not be permitted. The majority of residential areas are designated low density residential, with a couple of medium density residential blocks that were recently built. A special residential area located at the south west of the community consists of estate like residential lots in a wooded setting. To date, the Allison s Grove property (A) has had interest from potential developers, not an application has not been submitted. The lands north of the Foodland plaza (B) are not subject to a development application. The Community Focus Area (C) is intended to be a future commercial block. The blocks on Old Church Road, north of the Town s administrative campus (D) are subject to two site plan applications to permit live/work units, fronting on Atchison Road and on Old Church Road, with townhouse units proposed behind the live/work units. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

23 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Community Improvement Policies Section 5.17 of the Town s Official Plan provides for the selection of community improvement areas, which may be subject to a community improvement project area by law and a community improvement plan. A number of objectives are provided for community improvement areas (5.17.1). It is intended that public infrastructure be maximized in these areas; that the Town s physical, social and recreational facilities continue to be improved, to preserve and enhance commercial and employment areas; to participate in projects and programs which improve the physical environment and expand the economic base; to support private initiatives in property redevelopment or rehabilitation; and to coordinate funding resources to achieve community improvement. Community Improvement Areas are selected in accordance with the criteria outlined in Section For residential areas, criteria include: deficiencies in water/wastewater/storm water infrastructure; a need for substantial maintenance or rehabilitation of the housing stock; deficiencies in roads, sidewalks or related transportation infrastructure; a lack of recreational facilities; incompatible land uses; and opportunities for historical preservation. For commercial areas, criteria include: deficiencies in water/wastewater/storm water infrastructure; a need for maintenance, rehabilitation or redevelopment of a substantial portion of buildings; deficiencies in roads, sidewalks or related transportation infrastructure; a need for aesthetic improvements through landscaping, signage and façade improvement; indication of economic decline, such as a declining tax base, retail sales, or high vacancy rates; and opportunities for historical preservation. For industrial areas, criteria include deficiencies in infrastructure and the transportation network as above, as well as deficiencies in site usage/parking, building conditions and environmental problems. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 19

24 Section outlines the activities that the Town may undertake to support community improvement policies. This includes the designation of community improvement project areas and preparation of plans detailing required improvements. Funds may be allocated to acquire lands and undertake physical improvements, and the Town may participate in federal or Provincial funding programs which provide assistance to the municipality, community organizations or to landowners. Passage and enforcement of a Maintenance and Property Standards By law and Zoning restrictions is also considered to be a means of community improvement. Additionally, consideration may be given to a mix of land uses and bonus provisions for infill development, local improvements in accordance with the Local Improvements Act, and special arrangements with community organizations. Prior to adopting a Community Improvement Plan, Council is to be satisfied that it can reasonably finance implementation ( ). 3.7 Zoning By-law Zoning By law for Caledon is prepared to implement the policies of the Official Plan. It details the permitted uses, lot and building requirements for all lots in the community. In order to obtain a building permit, a property owner must be in compliance with the Zoning By law. The zoning for Caledon East is illustrated in Figure 4. This By law does not yet incorporate by law , which addresses lands within the Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Area. By law is still subject to the Minister s approval. Therefore, for lands in the Oak Ridges Moraine, By law still applies. The majority of properties in the Commercial core are zoned Commercial Village (CV), although some properties are subject to an exception. A number of commercial uses are permitted in this zone, including: animal hospitals; business offices; clinics; dry cleaning/laundry facilities; accessory dwellings (i.e., detached dwellings accessory to a nonresidential use); accessory dwelling units (i.e., a dwelling unit contained within and accessory to a non residential use); financial institutions; fitness centres; funeral homes; FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

25 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper merchandise service shops, motor vehicle gas bars; motor vehicle rental establishments; motor vehicle repair facilities; motor vehicle sales establishments; farmers markets; commercial and municipal parking lots; personal service shops; places of assembly; places of entertainment, excluding theatres; private clubs; restaurants; retail stores, not exceeding 925 m 2 net floor area per building; sales, service and repair shops; training facilities; and video outlet/rental stores, not exceeding 185 m 2 of net floor area. Note that in the CV zone, one accessory dwelling and one accessory dwelling unit may be permitted per establishment. It is unclear if dwellings above commercial uses are permitted; it appears that this type of mixed use is only permitted in the Village Core Commercial (CCV) zone, which permits dwelling units in addition to commercial uses. The CCV zone has not been applied to Caledon East. These uses are generally consistent with the uses permitted in the Official Plan, with the exception of motor vehicle uses, which the Official Plan intends are not permitted. However, this permission may be intended to recognize the existing gas bar in the core of the community. This permission would allow further development of motor vehicle related uses in the core area, which is not consistent with the intent of the Caledon East Secondary Plan. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 21

26 Figure 4 Zoning for Caledon East (under By-law ) FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

27 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper The lot and building standards include: A minimum lot area of 2,000 m 2 ; A minimum lot frontage of 30 metres; A maximum building area (lot coverage) of 25%; A minimum front yard of 9 metres; A minimum exterior side yard of 9 metres; A minimum rear yard of 10.5 metres, abutting a residential zone, or 7.5 metres abutting another zone; A minimum interior side yard of 4.5 metres; Planting strips at a minimum of 3 m are required along any portion of a rear lot line and any portion of an interior lot line which abuts a residential zone; A minimum front yard setback of 4.5 metres and minimum sight triangle setback of 3.5 metres is required for gas bars; Driveways are to be located a minimum of 4.5 metres from a lot line abutting a residential zone, and 1.5 metres from all other lot lines; and Buildings are a maximum of 10.5 metres. Some of these standards are not consistent with the established mainstreet character, where front yard setbacks are between 0 metres and about 3 metres (although there are a few exceptions). Additionally, the existing core area lots would likely require a higher building area than 25%. In order to redevelop uses in a manner that is consistent with the existing mainstreet character in the Commercial Core, a zoning amendment or variance(s) may be required. A 9 metre front yard setback could permit front yard parking, which may not be desirable along the mainstreet. Additionally, the maximum building height of 10.5 metres would permit up to three storeys as of right, where much of the established height along the mainstreet is one to two and a half storeys. The only existing three storey building is the new commercial building located on the east side of Airport Road, just north of the Caledon Trailway. It may be appropriate to provide three storeys in some contexts, where a transition in height can be provided. The existing one storey buildings may not be compatible with an adjacent three storey building. The design guidelines can be used to supplement the considerations for contextual appropriateness, and help the Town to limit development to two storeys where it is appropriate. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 23

28 The Institutional (I) zone applies to two lots in the core area. It permits a wide range of institutional type uses, ranging from cemeteries and parks to hospitals, schools and libraries. The lot standards are somewhat consistent with the CV zone, except that the minimum front yard is only 3 metres for serviced lots and 9 metres for unserviced lots. The 10.5 metre maximum building height also applies, except that it may be increased to 12.2 metres for Town of Caledon public uses and schools. The other standards are similar. There are six CV exceptions on Airport Road, which typically relate to permissions for higher lot coverage, both smaller and larger front yard setbacks, and various use permissions. The southern highway commercial area is also zoned an exception to the Commercial Village (CV) zone. Which provides for a limited range of commercial and office uses, including retail, and some reduced lot standards. A minimum front yard of 6.4 metres and maximum building area of 40% applies. The majority of residential areas in Caledon East are zoned Rural Residential (RR), which permits detached dwellings, as well as accessory apartments, private home day cares and home occupations (with a maximum of 6 students permitted for one lesson in relation to a home occupation involving instruction, among other criteria). 3.8 Town Design Guidelines and Streetscape Studies Caledon East Streetscape Study Architectural Guidelines (1994) and Design Concept (1994) According to the Caledon east Streetscape Study Architectural Guidelines Report, Caledon East was viewed as entering a new phase of growth, following the loss of much of the historic buildings, and a new opportunity for continued evolution and regeneration. It was recognized that future growth would place pressure on the community to accommodate new highway commercial development, and there would be challenges regarding road widenings and the potential for undesirable development. The intent of this document was to assist in the design of sidewalks, curbs, street plantings and furniture, and to assist in the design and physical form of the street, in a manner that is consistent with the vision and spirit of the community. Caledon East Architectural Guidelines Cover (top) and example of illustration guiding appropriate infill development on Airport Road FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

29 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Section 8 of the document addresses the guideline recommendations. The guidelines do not just relate to architecture, but apply to streetscape, built form and character in general. Guidelines are recommended for: Identification, maintenance, restoration, alterations and expansion of historic buildings; Maintenance, alterations and expansion of non historic buildings; Infill development (with specific guidelines for local context objectives, envelope, height, setbacks, density, design, features and materials); and General area policies for the various character areas of the community. The Design Concept report provides recommendations for specific public realm improvements, and provided an analysis of issues with regard to setbacks, parking, appearance of the streetscape, engineering concerns, and landscaping. The Plan also provides recommendations respecting development, to be considered in the site plan review process, such as the location of parking, access, sight triangles, and other elements. The authors of the Plan view that Caledon East is at a crossroads, in which appropriate infill and development and sensitive restoration of the village core will help to recreate a strong sense of place Caledon East Community Design and Architectural Design Guidelines (2000) The intent of this document was to support the implementation of the Caledon East Secondary Plan, which was approved in May The Guidelines assist in evaluating development proposals for appropriateness and compatibility. Generally speaking, the guidelines and illustrations apply primarily to new ground level residential uses in the new community areas. The guidelines address: Example illustrations showing guidelines for several prominent lots in new communities Architectural styling, based on historical precedents in the community (Sections ); Orientation of buildings on Airport Road, Old Church Road and Walker Road (Section 2.3); Special architectural detailing and landscaping for new dwellings at the new community gateways, which are shown on the Secondary Plan (Section 2.4); Architecture of dwellings adjacent to or near parks, trails and open space (Section 2.5); Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 25

30 Use of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Guidelines for infill development, including having similar massing/height/orientation of roof gables, setbacks, materials, proportions of architectural details, etc. (Section 2.7); Guidelines for the Special Use Areas shown on the Secondary Plan (section 2.8); Guidelines for streetscapes, addressing local roads (sidewalks on one side) and street furniture and mail boxes (Section 3.0); Guidelines for new neighbourhoods, including street pattern, lot size and building types, garages, building height, prominent lot considerations, massing, fencing and variety in housing types (Section 4.0); and Guidelines for individual homes, including guidelines for setbacks, elevations, garages, porches/entries/balconies, roofs, materials, wall finishes, windows, and special guidelines for townhouse blocks and general guidelines mixed use buildings, which have nonresidential uses in singles/semis/townhouses or multi storey buildings. A few guidelines may have some application to infill development and redevelopment, which may be promoted through the community improvement plan. However, the document is largely intended to be applicable to new, subdivision style development in new community areas in the Town. The document revisits the recommendations of the original 1994 study. The 2009 study recommends a number of specific improvements, including: A crosswalk on Airport Road, connecting the Caledon Trailway; Public art; Coordinated trash receptacles; A new seating area at the northwest corner of Airport Road and Walker Road West; Replacement of bollards to be consistent with the Plan; A special sign district should be created to guide store signage and street signage; and Municipal signage should be added to indicate locations of parkland and the Caledon Trail. Additionally, the study provides detailed recommendations for other streetscape areas not initially reviewed in the 1994 Study, including design concepts for each of the five road segments shown in Figure 5. Specific improvements to streetscapes and the public realm are detailed in Section FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

31 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Figure 5 Caledon East Streetscape Study Addendum Study Area 3. The Addendum also includes streetscape sections at selected locations in Appendix F. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 27

32 In addition, Section 3.1 provides general requirements for all areas, including minimum 1.5 metre sidewalks for all mixed use and nonresidential uses, street oriented development, implementation of street trees, coordinated light fixtures matching the 1994 study (with arms for hanging baskets and banners), improvements to all crosswalks at significant intersections are recommended (impressed asphalt and additional landscaping), two or three streamed trash receptacles, decorative fencing, and screened utility boxes. The Town currently applies these guidelines to development applications, and implements the proposed improvements through development applications. At this time, the public spaces intended for Old Church Road are being designed as part of the applicable development applications, including the two on going site plan applications for live/work units and townhouses on Old Church Road Industrial and Commercial Design Guidelines The Town has adopted general design guidelines applicable to commercial and industrial development. The guidelines address building siting, parking, access, landscaping, loading, outdoor display, lighting, and many other aspects of commercial and industrial design. The guidelines primarily apply to greenfield industrial and commercial development, where the context would differ from Caledon East, where no new commercial and industrial areas are proposed, and most future commercial development will take place in the form of redevelopment and infill. However, there are some transferrable guidelines that may be considered for the eligibility criteria in the community improvement plan, but they will be subject to considering the context of the subject property. 3.9 Peel Region Active Transportation Plan The Active Transportation Plan was prepared to support a more balanced, integrated and sustainable transportation system. This means increasing the share of trips made by walking, cycling, or other modes of active transportation, and contributing to a safe, accessible and pedestrianfriendly transportation network. The study recommends a vision, goals, as well as policies, guidelines and programs for achieving the vision and goals. A long term pedestrian and cycling network is recommended as part of the Plan. The Plan also includes recommendations regarding maintenance and monitoring/evaluating the implementation of the Active Transportation Plan. Long-term pedestrian network (upper image) and long-term cycling network (bottom image) according to the Region s Active Transportation Plan FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

33 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper There are some tie ins between the recommendations in the Caledon East Streetscape Study and the Peel Region Active Transportation Plan. While the Caledon East Streetscape Study makes recommendations for streetscape improvements, the design and implementation of these improvements should be made in consideration of the Active Transportation Plan, which contains recommendations for street configuration. For example, the recommended street crossing improvements and Caledon Trailway crossing improvements should have regard for the suggestions made in Section 8.6 (crossings and intersections), as well as the local context considerations in the 1994 Caledon East Streetscape Study. Additionally, the recommendations for an active transportation network signage strategy would apply to some of the Caledon East Streetscape Study s recommendations for signage improvements. The Active Transportation Plan contains numerous guidelines for designing streets, neighbourhoods and sites which are supportive of active transportation (e.g., 8.11 Site Design for Active Transportation). At this time, the Region is developing a pedestrian crossing across Airport Road to connect the Caledon Trailway, which implements a key initiative identified in the Active Transportation Plan. The Peel Safe and Active Routes to School program is managed by the Region of Peel, and is supported by the Active Transportation Plan. Official Plan Amendment 226 to the Town of Caledon s Official Plan promotes the cooperation of the Town, Region and school boards to support this program (Policy ). Implementation of the program is sometimes dependent upon the interest of the individual schools Region of Peel Streetscaping Guidelines The Region s Streetscaping Guidelines (2010) is a detailed document with recommended technical specifications, materials and design requirements for Regional roadways and related elements and pedestrian amenities. It is intended that the document will be applied by the Region, municipalities, developers and other professionals when retrofitting Regional roadways, designing roadway widenings and other capital projects. The Regional roads in Caledon East include Airport Road and Old Church Road. Old Church Road is intended to have a right of way of 30 metres, while Airport Road is intended to have a right of way of between 20 metres (south of Old Church Road), 26 metres (in the vicinity of the intersection with Old Church Road), and 36 metres (north of Walker Road and further Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 29

34 south of Old Church Road). Any recommended streetscaping improvements or related projects will need to have consideration for the Region of Peel Streetscaping Guidelines as well as the ongoing Regional Road Characterization Study Peel Regional Road Characterization Study The Regional Road Characterization Study applies to Regional Roads, including Airport Road and Old Church Road in Caledon East. The Study addresses roadway cross sections, design guidelines and measures for access management. The guidelines and measures balance roadway functionality with the context of the roadway s character, having regard for land use planning policy. It is the intent of the report that the roadway requirements will have ranges, to provide flexibility to suit the individual circumstances of the community. The report will need to be considered as part of any programs affecting Airport Road and Old Church Road Peel Region Healthy Communities Peel Public Health implements a number of studies and a wide range of services that are intended to promote the development of healthy and active communities. The Terms of Reference for the Community Improvement Plan requires that the CIP will contribute to achieving a sustainable community delivering a high quality of life. Consideration has been made to integrate the policies and guidelines of the Peel Healthy Development Index Report, the Health Background Study and the Healthy Development Index Recommendations Report, to ensure that the CIP is consistent with the recommendations of these studies for promoting healthy and active living. These studies are discussed in the following subsections Peel Healthy Development Index Report (2009) The Peel Healthy Development Index report (December 2009) was prepared to assist in Peel Public Health s review of development applications. Since 2005, Peel Public Health had been commenting on development proposals, providing comments to staff with regard to the design of healthy communities. The report was prepared to provide clear and consistent standards that Peel Public Health could apply to its development application review, and to base these standards on research and evidence. The framework of development standards for healthy communities are referred to as the Peel Healthy Development Index (HDI). FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

35 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper The framework addresses specific targets for various design and locational elements of a development proposal, including density, proximity to services (including transit), land use mix, street connectivity, road network/sidewalks, parking and aesthetics and human scale. Appendix A includes an initial scoring guide (noted that it is for discussion purposes), which outlines both prerequisite and credit requirements for each of the seven built environment elements. The Appendix recommends that developments must meet all prerequisite requirements in order to be considered minimally supportive of healthy community design principles. Additionally, developments can obtain additional certifications by meeting a specified number of credits. The credits and prerequisite requirements are based on a scientific analysis of the relationship of built form and community design to health. The following table briefly summarizes the key prerequisite requirements and credit requirements: Community Design Element Prerequisite Requirements (Minimum requirements)) Summary of Community Design Characteristics that Earn Optional Credits 1. Density Higher density communities are a strong indicator of a walkable, healthy community. 2. Service Proximity Proximity to public services, retail, transit, and employment promotes walking and healthier living. 3. Land Use Mix: A heterogeneous mix of residential, service and employment allows residents to fulfill daily needs by walking or cycling, and therefore improves day to day active living. Minimum residential density of 35 units per hectare and minimum floor area ratio of 0.7 At least 75% of units must be within less than 800 m of 5 neighbourhood public services, 7 neighbourhood retail services and the centre of residential communities must be within 800 m of jobs equal to 50% of the total number of residential units Higher density Higher floor area ratios Residential units are located within a greater number of neighbourhood services, retail services Residential units are located within proximity of a transit stop Residential units are located within a 30 minute transit trip to a large number of jobs None At least 5% of community land use outdoor space, community provides new services to a neighbourhood, and there is a mix of several different housing types Ground floor pedestrian use along at least 60% of street façade Less than 30% of units are large lot detached homes (greater than 15 m frontage) Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 31

36 Community Design Element 4. Street Connectivity High connectivity of streets improves the directness of travel and also increases the ease of non motorized options for reaching destinations. 6. Parking Unappealing parking lots can discourage pedestrian activity, and minimum parking standards encourage automobile dependence and reduces housing affordability. 7. Aesthetics and Human Scale human scaled environments (which appeal to senses of people) are perceived as safer, more comfortable, and more inviting and hence encourage pedestrian activity. Prerequisite Requirements (Minimum requirements)) Minimum average intersection density must be 75 intersections per km 2 and maximum single block size must be 1.5 ha Elimination of minimum parking requirements and use of parking maximums, so that parking matches average demand Maximum 7.6 m setback of detached buildings, 4.6 m for other residential buildings, 3 m for commercial and light industrial buildings; Most commercial/mixed use buildings are flush with sidewalk; Main entrances of all buildings do not front on parking lots Summary of Community Design Characteristics that Earn Optional Credits Higher intersection density Minimum number of bike lanes on streets, depending on road typology and maximum lane width of 3.2 m Minimum number of traffic calming measures per hectare (such as speed bumps, pedestrianpriority streets, specialized crossings, etc.) At least 10% of local roads are less than 15 km/h with pedestrian priority design (more credits for higher proportion) Average sidewalk widths of 2.5 m on all mixed use streets Buffer strips and/or curbside parking on both sides of all streets Cycle friendly design measures such as dedicated raised bicycle lanes, bicycle priority streets, etc. Minimum standards for street lighting Provide unbundled parking for a proportion of multifamily dwellings Allow shared parking so parking spaces can count towards two separate uses Measures to control the price of parking based on demand All driveways a maximum of 3 m wide Most residences have no parking or rear parking only All buildings have rear or side parking lots Most lots do not have garages in front façade On street parking on both sides of most streets Building height to street width ratio Larger proportion of commercial buildings are flush with sidewalk Most commercial lots do not have blank walls and have a maximum frontage of 15 m Minimum tree planting requirements FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

37 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper This framework may be utilized to support eligibility criteria in the Community Improvement Plan, particularly in relation to redevelopment proposals and infill development. Compliance with the criteria (i.e., Appendix A the scoring guide and scorecard, and Table 1, which summarizes the scoring) may be used as a minimum requirement for obtaining a grant or loan. Alternatively, proposals that exceed the criteria could potentially be eligible for a larger grant or loan Health Background Study: Development of a Health Background Study Framework (May 2011) In 2011, the Health Background Study was prepared to build on the work undertaken for the Healthy Development Index report, and to be a more user friendly evaluation tool. This study was part of the Healthy Canada by Design work, led by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and funded by Health Canada. Again, the intent of the document is to provide a framework for reviewing development applications in terms of their impact on health. The report assesses existing efforts by the local municipalities, the City of Toronto and the Region of Peel to advance healthy development principles, such as the preparation of the Peel Active Transportation Plan, local policies and other initiatives. Appended to the report is a User Guide and Terms of Reference document, which are to be used collectively to assess the health impacts of a proposed development. Other actions to implement the study are recommended in the Implementation Strategy. The report utilizes the same elements as the healthy development index as described in the previous section, except that it notes that aesthetics and human scale generally overlaps with existing design guidelines and planning policy. The appendix contains criteria for each of the design elements. Many of the criteria are similar to the criteria presented in the Healthy Development Index, but some are adjusted slightly and some new criteria are introduced. Like the initial Healthy Development Index, this document may form a basis for eligibility criteria for incentives The Healthy Development Index Recommendations Report (October 2011) The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada retained a consulting firm to refine, evaluate and implement the Region s Healthy Development Index Standards. The report tests the HDI against proposed and existing community developments, and suggests some refinements to the HDI based on this analysis. In general, the study was supportive of the HDI as a means of evaluating the health impacts of a community. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 33

38 City and Regional Residential Preferences Study The City and Regional Residential Preferences Study was prepared as part of the Healthy Canada by Design initiative. The study surveyed residents in the Greater Vancouver Area and Greater Toronto Area to better understand the preferences of people for factors in neighbourhood selection, home size, etc. Based on the detail survey and statistical analysis, the study concluded that residents generally indicate that most people prefer a very walkable neighbourhood, or a neighbourhood with both characteristics of walkable and auto oriented communities. The survey indicates that there is an unfulfilled demand for walkable neighbourhoods, given that participants who live in an auto oriented neighbourhood showed desire to live in a more walkable neighbourhood. Most respondents indicated an alignment of their neighbourhood preference and the type of neighbourhood they live in. The survey further indicated that people who already live in a more walkable neighbourhood are also more active. This study further supports the importance of designing attractive, walkable communities Changing Course: Creating Environments for Healthy Living in Peel The report entitled Changing Course: Creating Environments for Healthy Living in Peel (2012) analyzes the obesity epidemic and recommends a framework for action, to change physical activity and diet behaviors. Of relevance to the Community Improvement Plan, the report notes that schools have a major role in ensuring that children develop good physical activity habits, which could include active transportation to and from school. The report also supports the Healthy Development Index to ensure that built environments are supportive of healthy, active lifestyles Healthy Canada by Design The Healthy Canada by Design initiative is a partnership project between the Urban Public Health Network, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and other partners. Through the program, the sponsors are intending to develop planning tools which will help to promote the design and development of healthy and active communities, based on the extensive research available on the links between health and built form. Through this program, the Region of Peel has been engaged in promoting the development of healthy communities, and has participated in a number of symposiums, presentations and prepared reports and planning tools in support of the initiative, including the Healthy Development Index, for example. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

39 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper 4. SWOT Analysis The consulting team has undertaken a preliminary strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis to identify the types of issues and opportunities that the Community Improvement Plan may be able to address. Policy/Legislative Framework Strengths Policy framework provides a detailed structure and planning vision for Caledon East Extensive urban design/streetscape guidance, including detailed recommendations for streetscape improvements, trail improvements, etc. Guidance on development of healthy communities Weaknesses Zoning does not always provide for main street character (maximum lot coverage is too low, maximum front yard setback is too high, 3 storey as of right may not be appropriate on all lots, especially next to existing one storey buildings). This means that a zoning by law amendment or variance is required to build consistently with the historic character. Design guidelines can supplement these gaps. Opportunities Redevelopment and infill is contemplated by the Official Plan, provided it is appropriately scaled in a village mainstreet context As the community grows out to its settlement area boundary, there may be increased pressure for redevelopment and infill Policy/guidelines framework forms a good basis for eligibility criteria (i.e., proposals can be evaluated about whether they are consistent with various applicable guidelines) Community improvement plan can help to coordinate implementation of various plans, projects and guidelines Threats Need to ensure that Regional Road Characterization Study has consideration for the policy/design framework for Caledon East Need to ensure that improvement activities, redevelopment and infill is consistent the policy framework, and seeks opportunities to implement the Streetscape Study Addendum Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 35

40 Urban Design, Streetscapes, Pedestrian Network (see Figure 6) Strengths Generally consistent sidewalk treatments, furniture, lighting, street parking help to distinguish the core area, and a gateway feature is provided on Airport Road at the south side of the community Caledon trailway provides a pedestrian connection across the community Some mature street trees on Airport Road, south of Old Church Road, provide an amenity Some street parking helps to define the pedestrian realm (on portions of Airport Road, and along Old Church Road) Most main building entrances are accessible, at grade (though there are a few exceptions, noted below) Most residential streets have at least one sidewalk Weaknesses Somewhat frequent location of driveways and wide driveways can be disruptive to pedestrians Some residential streets do not have sidewalks New communities to the northeast are disconnected from the historic grid pattern Lack of key public gathering space (note that one is proposed north of the Town s administrative offices) Some signage and façades are not consistent with historic character or traditional materials. Signage is often designed primarily for driver visibility Old Church Road/Airport Road intersection is more vehicle oriented, with a wide turning radius for right turns Lack of pedestrian refuge and safety from vehicles on Airport Road Opportunities Opportunities to implement the detailed recommendations of the Caledon East Streetscape Study Addendum, for streetscape improvements in the core and in the vicinity of the core Good opportunity for improved streetscape amenities (trees, furniture) on wide sidewalks, between the curb and the defined pedestrian zone Opportunity for façade improvements, streetscape improvements, and other private property improvements (landscaping, paving, parking), which may be incentivized by the community improvement plan Opportunity for improved crosswalks Photos illustrating streetscape characteristics and amenities in Caledon East, including Airport Road, near the newer 3-storey commerical building just north of the Caledon Trailway (top), Airport Road at Caledon Trailway looking north (upper middle), Airport Road at Caledon Trailway looking south (lower middle), Airport Road north of Old Church Road looking north (bottom) FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

41 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Threats Need to ensure that Regional Road Characterization Study has consideration for the policy/design framework for Caledon East There needs to be coordination with the Region for streetscape solutions on Regional roads (Airport Road and Old Church Street) Consideration needs to be made to the criteria and targets of the Healthy Development Index and Health Background Study, to ensure continued development and improvement of Caledon East in a manner that supports healthy and active living Building and Property Condition Photos illustrating building and property characteristics in the core. A well maintained commerical building with newer awnings (top) and a vacant commercial building (bottom) Strengths Residential communities and institutional uses are well maintained and landscaped Some examples of well maintained commercial properties with landscaped parking Weaknesses Some buildings, signage, façades would benefit from façade improvements Many properties would benefit to side yard improvements (side yard landscaping, paving of rear parking access, etc.) Opportunities Some buildings may be suitable for redevelopment Façade improvement program would strongly benefit the aesthetics and contribute towards achieving a more consistent character There are many opportunities for improved front yard landscaping improvements (particularly where there is front yard parking), side yard landscaping and access Most significant infill or reuse opportunity is the property at the south east corner of Emma Street and Airport Road (north of the Caledon Trailway) but redevelopment is subject to flood risk issues Threats It will be important to be strategic about where property improvements are permitted. If a property has substantial redevelopment opportunity, compatible redevelopment of the property should be preferred/prioritized over minor property improvements. Rising energy costs may affect viability of older buildings Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 37

42 Figure 6 Existing Streetscape Elements FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

43 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Recreational Opportunities Caledon East Trailway Crossing over Airport Road Strengths Caledon Trailway is accessible and in walking distance from most residents Extensive outdoor and indoor recreational amenities on Old Church Road (Caledon East Community Park Caledon East Community Complex, Soccer fields) Weaknesses Lack of a complete and safe crossing of the Caledon Trailway over Airport Road Additional cycling facilities could be provided Need for recreational activities oriented for seniors Opportunities Public space on the north side of Old Church Road, in accordance with the Secondary Plan, is being developed in association with on going development applications Valleyland setting creates opportunities for trailways around the community Threats N/A Parking and Vehicle Access Buffering of side yard parking area (top) and example of driveway and side/rear yard parking (bottom) Strengths Rear parking provided for some properties on Airport Road Some street parking provided on Airport Road, and on Old Church Road Weaknesses Some side yard and front yard parking Some parking areas are not well buffered from the sidewalk As indicated, there are frequent driveways which interrupts pedestrians Lack of transit to Caledon East (currently Caledon Village and Bolton have GO Transit service) Opportunities Some lots provide opportunity for use as municipal parking, should it be required as intensification occurs As redevelopment occurs, consideration should be made to consolidate driveways for shared access, with shared rear parking, or side yard parking if rear yard parking is not feasible Threats There is a threat that landowners will not redevelop their properties, but may neglect their properties or demolish their building for parking or other undesirable uses High parking standards may be influencing auto dominance in the community and impacting health Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 39

44 Heritage Strengths Seven properties designated under the Ontario Heritage Act, five of which are in or near the community s core area (see Figure 7) o Three properties have received grants for various improvements Numerous other properties are listed as being of interest, most of which are located on Airport Road, Old Church Road, and in the older residential area (Parsons Avenue and Emma Street area) Town maintains detailed inventory and understanding of properties of interest Weaknesses Many properties of historic interest have not been well maintained, or have been modified with nonhistoric materials Opportunities Opportunity to restore some properties of interest, and ensure continued maintenance and adaptive reuse of designated properties Threats Lack of good maintenance and restoration threatens viability of reusing historical properties Redevelopment may threaten potential reuse and restoration of properties of interest Historic signage at trailway (top), designated heritage property, Airport Road (bottom) FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

45 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Figure 7 Designated and Listed Heritage Properties in Caledon East Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 41

46 Businesses, Business Mix, Employment Strengths Community has access to many essential business services (hardware store, grocery store) Some unique, local shops LCBO is an anchor store for the community s core Policy framework does not permit further highway commercial development and helps to sustain corearea businesses as the community grows (and limits amount of retail space) Many large employers in Caledon East (administrative offices, schools) Weaknesses Redevelopment or infill will need to occur in order to provide more commercial space Opportunities Could be opportunity for further small scale commercial development as community grows Opportunity for Business Improvement Area to be formed Could be opportunity for farmers market, recognizing function of Caledon East as a rural service centre Threats Continued residential growth will create new demand for commercial services, which currently would require redevelopment or infill Housing Types and Affordability Strengths Wide variety of housing types and affordability levels in Caledon East Weaknesses May be a lack of smaller housing units Opportunities Opportunity for mixed use development/redevelopment with housing units above commercial uses, in accordance with the planning policy framework Threats N/A FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

47 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper 5. Other Approaches to Community Revitalization Many municipalities in Ontario have adopted community improvement plans to assist in the revitalization of their communities. It is important to consider other municipal approaches to understand the factors that influence the success of Community Improvement Plans. Following is a discussion of several relevant community improvement plans, followed by an analysis of lessons learned from these case studies in section Bolton Community Improvement Plan The Bolton Community Improvement Plan (approved by Council in April 2011) is the Town of Caledon s only in effect community improvement plan. The Plan applies various incentive programs and municipal leadership strategies to several precincts in the community. Incentive programs include rebates for application fees/development charges, tax increment equivalent grants, building and façade improvement grants, landscaping improvement grants, grants for energy efficiency retrofits, grants for mixeduse construction or conversion projects, and grants for environmental studies (Environmental Site Assessments). Bolton Community Improvement Plan Cover Eligibility for the incentive programs is very detailed, and includes both general eligibility criteria, as well as program specific eligibility criteria. Detailed urban design guidelines were prepared to complement the community improvement plan s eligibility criteria. It is intended that projects should comply with applicable guidelines in order to be eligible for incentives. The municipal leadership strategy enables the Town to undertake a number of projects to assist in revitalizing the community. The strategy broadly addresses streetscape improvements, trail/cycling improvements, improvements to intersections and crossings, and provides for municipal acquisition of land to reconfigure roads and provide for open space. The strategy also provides for further studies, including updates to the Town s parking study and a transit oriented development strategy. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 43

48 The CIP also provides a strategy for marketing, and evaluating and refining the programs. The Town currently maintains a dedicated web page for publishing materials related to the CIP. Since its adoption, the Town of Caledon has approved eight applications for incentives. The applications were mostly landscape and building/façade improvements, but a couple of applications requested application and permit fee grants, as well as one application for the energy efficiency retrofit program. In total, the Town has granted $67,702.68, at an average of $8, for each application. 5.2 Downtown Perth Community Improvement Plan The Downtown Perth Community Improvement Plan enables a wide range of incentive programs for properties located within the Town s historic downtown area, including façade improvements, signage improvements, property improvements, heritage property improvements, application/permit fee grants, building code/energy efficiency grants and housing improvement grants (for creation of new housing units or improvement of housing units in upper storeys). However, the Town has prioritized its funding for its façade and signage improvement program. The Plan provides grants equal to the greater of $5,000 or one third of the total cost of the project. Photos of historic downtown Perth s built form and streetscape Due to limited resources and demand, the Town manages planned intake periods when applications are accepted and considered by the Town on a first come, first served basis (subject to meeting eligibility requirements). Under this approach, the Review Panel is able to review all applications within one meeting following the intake period. The Town has publicly reported the success of the Plan in In 2011, the Plan funded five façade improvement projects, totaling just over $19,000 in grants, with an average grant value of about $3,800. On average, the cost of the project was about $12,200, meaning that about $8,400 was invested on average. This means that every dollar of public investment leveraged about $2.21 of private investment. The Town administered the same program in 2012 and has also begun accepting applications for funding in Like Caledon, the Town of Perth also maintains a web site for promoting, marketing and describing the CIP. Currently, the Town budgets $25,000 per year for its programs. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

49 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Haldimand County Community Improvement Plan 5.3 Haldimand County Downtown Areas Community Improvement Plan The Haldimand County Downtown Areas Community Improvement Plan enables financial incentives and municipal leadership programs for six downtown areas in the County. The plan enables a wide variety of incentive programs, including tax increment equivalent grants, façade improvements, downtown housing improvements, heritage property improvements and planning application/building permit fee rebates. Projects which are located near waterfront areas are eligible for larger incentives. The County provides an annual budget of $100,000 to support its incentive programs. The County has experienced general success with its CIP. As of 2012, it had issued over $218,125 in grants resulting in $1.2 million in private investment. This means that for each $1 in public investment, there was about $5.42 in private investment. The success of the Downtown Areas Community Improvement Plan is considered to be attributed to several factors, including extensive marketing (which has included the Lieutenant Governor s Award for Marketing Excellence in Ontario) and on going monitoring and evaluation. Rear laneway and mural in Downtown Chatham, Ontario 5.4 Chatham-Kent Downtown and Main Street Areas Community Improvement Plan The Municipality of Chatham Kent is a very large, primarily rural municipality, but it includes several urban settlements and historic main street areas. The Community Improvement Plan for Downtown and Main Street Areas enabled a number of incentive programs aimed at revitalizing the core areas, including heritage tax relief grants, tax increment equivalent rebates, façade improvements, housing improvements and project feasibility grants. Like Haldimand, properties near waterfront areas are eligible for larger incentives. On average, the Municipality has provided approximately $200,000 in funding for its financial incentive programs each year, but varies funding based on the total remaining balance of the CIP funding budget. Since the implementation of the CIP in 2004, 118 applications have been approved, resulting in over $1.1 million in grants which leveraged over $4.8 million in private investment. This means that for every $1 in public spending, approximately $4.36 in private investment was leveraged. The Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 45

50 Municipality has been committed to CIP monitoring, evaluation and updates, and has implemented a marketing strategy. The Municipality has since shifted its focus to implementing the Brownfields and Bluefields Community Improvement Plan and its new Commercial Community Improvement Plan. 5.5 New Tecumseth Community Improvement Plan The Town of New Tecumseth approved a community improvement plan for its historic downtown (March 2012). The Plan provides for several grant and loan programs, including façade improvement grants/loans, signage/awning/lighting grants, parkland dedication fee grants, planning application/building permit fee grants, and building code upgrade grants/loans for a wide range of projects. The programs are primarily intended to help conserve the historic buildings in the core areas of Alliston, Beeton and Tottenham. The value of grants range from $2,500 to $20,000 per program, and cover up to 50% of the eligible costs. As a general policy, the Plan provides small grant increases for properties which implement design details in accordance with Barrier Free Design policies, and also for properties which are designated under Parts IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act. 5.6 Lessons Learned Although the Community Improvement Plans highlighted above were generally successful, their success has been attributed to several key aspects of the Plan and its administration: Grants and loans are always capped. It is intended that revitalization is an effort that is shared the Town and the private sector, in order for the programs to be sustainable. Typically, the total value of incentives does not exceed 50% of the cost of the improvement project (or 33% as in Perth s case). The incentive programs relate to the critical needs of the community. While the community improvement plans above typically offer a wide range of incentives, the incentives relate to the critical needs of downtown areas or other areas that are subject to the CIP. With limited resources available to fund plans, each municipality has adapted to provide some mechanisms for prioritizing applications for incentives. Some plans take a strict first come, first served approach, FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

51 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper while others prioritize specific types of projects. Perth adopted a limited window of opportunity in which it makes the program available. Some plans prioritize limited incentives by to provide greater incentives for certain types of applications (such as mixed use development or properties near waterfronts). Eligibility criteria is key to the success of the community improvement plan. Eligibility criteria enable the Town to be selective about which projects should receive funding, so that only desirable projects, which contribute to the vision for the community, are incentivized. Additionally, eligibility criteria can help the municipality to prioritize applications for a certain area (such as the Core Area), or prioritize applications that relate to an urgent issue (such as heritage property improvement). Alternatively, greater incentives may be provided for certain application types, such as improvements related to heritage properties. Eligibility criteria also helps to protect the municipality from fraudulent applications, by requiring that applicants obtain quotes for the work, provide photos and plans, as necessary. Municipalities emphasize the ease of applying for and obtaining incentives. Members of the public and businesses can have a perception that obtaining government grants and loans is a difficult process with high costs. It is important to minimize the costs for applying for incentives. As the administrator of the Bolton Community Improvement Plan, the Town should not have difficulty in implementing an efficient application process while at the same time ensuring that improvements are high quality and desirable for the community. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 47

52 6. Consultation It is important to have a thorough consultation process as part of the process for developing a community improvement plan. Ultimately, the success of the Plan will depend upon the uptake of financial incentive programs and the commitment by stakeholders to implement the Plan s municipal leadership programs. In the course of preparing the Plan, the following individuals and groups are to be consulted: Town staff and other public agencies are to be consulted to help identify the types of issues that can be addressed by the CIP and the policies/guidelines/regulations that can be implemented through eligibility criteria. Business owners, property owners are to be consulted to help understand the barriers to revitalizing Caledon East, and to identify which types of incentive programs they might utilize. The public is to be consulted to help understand issues of aesthetics, shopping preferences, and other matters that can inform the CIP s programs. Council is to be consulted, as they will be responsible for approving the Plan and setting forth funding for incentive programs and municipal leadership projects. At the time of preparing this report, meetings have been held as follows: A brief delegation with Council was held on April 16, 2013, to present the study process, purpose of the study, and to outline preliminary issues and ideas for consideration in the Community Improvement Plan. A meeting with Stakeholders was held on March 18, 2013 to identify how the CIP can help support and implement other initiatives (refer to Section 6.1). Participants included Town staff, the Region of Peel, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Peel District School Board and the Dufferin Peel Catholic District School Board. A meeting with Town staff and the Region was held on April 23, 2013 (see Section 6.2). A public and stakeholder open house and workshop was held during the evening on April 23, 2013, to kick off the project and seek input on the issues and opportunities that can be addressed by the Community Improvement Plan (see Section 6.3). FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

53 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper 6.1 Stakeholder Meeting On March 18, 2013, the consulting team, staff from the Town of Caledon, the Region of Peel, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Peel District School Board and the Dufferin Peel Catholic District School Board participated in a meeting of public agency stakeholders. The primary purpose of the meeting was to brainstorm opportunities for the CIP to help implement other studies and projects being considered by the stakeholders. Additionally, participants were asked to identify issues that may be addressed by the CIP. A number of potential issues and opportunities were discussed, including: Region of Peel Active Transportation Plan: The Active Transportation Plan, which was approved by Council, promotes the development of more walkable and bike friendly communities. It is implemented by supportive programs, policies as well as Official Plan policies (which guide development and municipal decisionmaking). The Region noted that a crossing over Airport Road to connect the Caledon Trailway is under consideration. Civic Campus Master Plan: A master plan for the civic campus area is being prepared, with consideration being made to move the historic Orange Lodge property to this area. Other configuration improvements to parking and public spaces may be made. Walk to school program (Peel Safe and Active Routes to School): The Region promotes the development of walking routes to school, which must be consistent with various criteria. Participation in the Peel Safe and Active Routes to School Program depends on the interest of the individual schools. The Committee advocates Currently, most students are bused or are driven to school by parents in Caledon East. New opportunities for St. Cornelius students to walk to school may be created when the nearby park is completed, to create a connection to the newer subdivision to the north of the civic campus area. The Region s School Travel Planning Pilot Program promotes active transportation among students, but currently applies to just three schools in Brampton since it is a pilot program. Peel Healthy Development Index / Health Background Study: These tools are used to promote the development of healthy, active and accessible environments and are generally implemented in the Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 49

54 review of development proposals and infrastructure projects. The Health Background Study is intended to build upon the Healthy Development Index and is intended to be a more user friendly document. Community based Social Marketing: This project, in its early stages, aims to identify a pilot study area in which a marketing strategy will be used to promote more active living. There was some discussion as to whether Caledon East should be considered for the pilot community; however, the criteria for selecting the community has not yet been prepared. Caledon East Flood Plain Study: This study, which is being finalized in the near future, applies to approximately eight properties in the business area of the Caledon East core. In this area, there will limitations on property improvements (minor additions will be subject floodproofing) and no development will be permitted. The study does not currently address a two zone approach, in which development could be permitted in a flood fringe area, subject to floodproofing. There are several potential opportunities for the Community Improvement Plan to support the studies above. The policies of the Active Transportation Plan, the Peel Healthy Development Index/Health Background Study can be implemented as eligibility criteria in the Community Improvement Plan. This ensures that projects being considered for grants are consistent with and help to implement the Region s goal of creating healthier, walkable and bike friendly environments. Additionally, there may be an opportunity to incent flood proofing projects in the flood risk area around Old Church Road/Airport Road. However, the potentially cost of such improvements may mean that the incentives would need to be large in order to be worthwhile. Guidance for flood proofing will also need to be finalized to inform the list of eligible projects. 6.2 Advisory Committee Meeting The consulting team met with the Town and Regional staff to discuss other studies, projects and potential issues that can be addressed by the Community Improvement Plan. The following topics were discussed: Energy Efficiency: There is an opportunity to encourage energy efficiency improvements through financial incentives, however, it will be important to ensure that the eligible projects are clear and easy to administer. FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited

55 Final Draft Background and Assessments Discussion Paper Heritage: Heritage conservation is a major interest for the town, and the Community Improvement Plan can be used to help owners restore façades and to adaptively reuse heritage buildings. As noted previously, a number of properties are designated and listed in Caledon East, and the Town has previously implemented grants and taxation incentives to assist in maintaining and restoring heritage properties. Development: Ongoing land development projects were discussed by the committee. Flood Risks: The flood risk study was also discussed (refer to the summary as discussed by the Stakeholder Committee above). Building Code Compliance/Secondary Suites: The committee did not consider building code compliance and secondary suites to be an issue in Caledon East. Secondary Suites have been permitted in Caledon East for many years, so there are not likely any issues of non compliance. Streetscape: As noted in this report, the Streetscape Study and Streetscape Study Addendum recommend a wide range of projects. The Town indicated that these projects are now implemented as part of development projects, and the Studies are used to review development applications. Administration: To be consistent with the Bolton CIP, the Town generally does not support the administration of loan programs, and the CIP should only consider grants. The Town currently administers a development charges exemption in the core business area, and consideration can be made to extend this exemption to the highway commercial area. 6.3 Public Open House and Workshop An open house and workshop was held on April 23, 2013, at the Caledon East Community Complex. Participants were invited by way of notice in the newspaper and an online notice. The format of the meeting included: An open house, in which participants could review display boards or speak with the Town/consultants; A presentation, outlining the process for the study and preliminary findings; and A workshop, in which participants were asked to discuss their vision for Caledon East, issues that can be addressed by the Plan, and to discuss the relative importance of the options for financial incentive and municipal leadership programs. Caledon East Community Improvement Plan Study 51

56 In total, 35 persons signed in as they entered (since a few participants may not have signed in, the total number of participants may have been as high as 40). Approximately participants stayed to participate in the workshop. Participants joined one of four workshop tables, and each group was facilitated by a staff member. The summary of input received at each of the tables is as follows: Table 1 Table 2 Consideration should be made to improve and maintain trails other than the Caledon Trailway, such as the trails in proximity to the new subdivision; Flooding concerns need to be addressed in order for revitalization and redevelopment to proceed; Truck traffic represents a concern in the core area; Adequate parking needs to be considered in the core area, including the potential for an off street parking area; Nursing homes should be developed in Caledon East; Support for redevelopment, growth and improvement of main street into an attractive shopping area; Support for heritage conservation; Support for most of the financial incentive programs, especially façade improvements, heritage improvements, flood proofing General support for the municipal leadership programs, and consideration should be made to provide amenities for seniors; Caledon East s strengths include its proximity to the GTA, its beautiful setting amongst natural areas; Noted that youth need a gathering place; Restrictions on downtown businesses should be relieved; The local network of trails should be improved; Development and buildings should be senior friendly and accessible; Floodproofing issues need to be addressed; The table had support for beautification, such as flower planting and murals; and The Town should restore an Area Councillor. Photograph of the public open house and workshop on April 23, 2013 FINAL DRAFT May 14, 2013 MMM Group Limited