ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA"

Transcription

1 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 21, 2006 DATE: January 19, 2005 SUBJECTS: A. Z REZONING: Potomac Custom Builders, LC, from RA8-18 Apartment Dwelling Districts, R-5 One-Family, Restricted Two- Family Dwelling Districts to R15-30T Residential Town House Dwelling Districts; 1908, 1912, 1916, 1918, 1924, 1926 N. Vance St. (RPC # , -013, -014, -015, -016, -017) B. SP #393 SITE PLAN: Potomac Custom Builders, LC, approximately 20 townhouse units, one single-family dwelling; 1908, 1912, 1916, 1918, 1924, 1926 N. Vance St. (RPC # , -013, -014, -015, -016, -017) Applicant: Potomac Custom Builders, LC. By: William B Lawson, Jr Wilson Boulevard, Suite 100 Arlington, Virginia C.M. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. Defer consideration of the request for a rezoning from RA8-18 Apartment Dwelling Districts, R-5 One-Family, Restricted Two-Family Dwelling Districts to R15-30T Residential Town House Dwelling Districts; 1908, 1912, 1916, 1918, 1924, 1926 N. Vance St. (RPC # , -013, -014, -015, -016, -017) to the February 6, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and the February 25, 2006 County Board meeting. B. Defer consideration of the request for a site plan containing 20 dwelling units to the February 6, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and the February 25, 2006 County Board meeting. ISSUES: Notification of adjacent property owners was not done in compliance with the Code of Virginia for the Planning Commission meeting on January 9, County Manager: County Attorney: Staff: James Brown, Planning Division, DCPHD Tunji Akiwowo, Housing Division, DCPHD Adam Denton, Transportation Division, DES

2 SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking approval of a revised site plan for 20 townhouses on a site of 32,521 square feet. The site is located north of Lee Highway along North Vance Street. The applicant s previous proposal was to develop 20 townhouses and one single family home. At their November meeting, the County Board deferred consideration of the project in order to allow the applicant time to revise the project to address issues related to parking and density. The applicant has eliminated the proposed new single family home in order to provide additional parking in response to the identified need for adequate guest parking and to reduce overall density. Additionally, the applicant has eliminated dividing walls within the enclosed parking areas in order to allow for larger spaces and easier access to vehicles. In order to accommodate the proposed development, the applicant is requesting a rezoning from RA8-18 Apartment Dwelling District and R-5 One-family Dwelling District to R15-30T Residential Town House Dwelling District. The requested rezoning is consistent with the site s General Land Use Plan designation of Low-Medium Residential. Additionally, the area surrounding the site currently contains a significant amount of townhouse development. The R15-30T zoning allows for townhouse development with County Board approval via the site plan process, however, its by-right development potential does not exceed what is currently available under the existing R-5 zoning. The proposed revised site plan is generally consistent with the requirements of the requested zoning district and complies with the requirements for density and parking. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposal at their January 9, 2006 meeting and recommended approval. However, staff has determined that proper notification for the Planning Commission hearing for this project was not given. Therefore, staff is recommending that the project be deferred to the February 6, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and the February 25, 2006 County Board meeting. BACKGROUND: The site plan proposes the construction of a residential development on North Vance Street. The site is currently occupied by several single-family detached homes. The applicant proposes to construct 20 townhouses on the site. The site s existing General Land Use Plan designation is Low-Medium Residential (16-36 units per acre). The 1.4 acre site is currently zoned a mixture of R-6 One-Family Dwelling District and RA8-18 Apartment Dwelling District. The site is located within the North Highland Civic Association Boundaries. The following provides additional information about the site and location: Site: The site is currently occupied by single-family homes. The new site area comprises a total of 32,520 square feet. Uses adjacent to the site include the following: Z , SP #

3 To the north: To the east: To the west: Potomac Towers, a 10 story residential apartment building with 406 units (zoned RA6-15 ) is immediately north of the site. I-66 lies just north of Potomac Towers. A townhouse development containing six (6) units (zoned RA8-18 ) and six (6) single-family homes ( zoned R-5 ) lie immediately east of the site. Bergman s Cleaners is located one block to the east. Single-family homes (zoned R-5 ) border the western edge of the site. To the south: Across Lee Highway there is a mixture of town house and single-family residential development. Zoning: The site is zoned a combination of RA8-18 Apartment Dwelling District (5,607 square feet) and R-5 Single-Family Dwelling (26,914 square feet). The applicant has requested a rezoning to R15-30T Residential Town House Dwelling District. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the GLUP designation. R15-30T allows by-right development as permitted within R-5 One-Family, Restricted Two-Family Dwelling Districts (eight dwelling units per acre) and site plan development of townhouses within a range of dwelling units per acre. General Land Use Plan: The site is designated Low-Medium Residential on the GLUP. The zoning districts generally associated with this designation are R15-30T Residential Town House Dwelling District, RA14-26 Apartment Dwelling District and RA8-18 Apartment Dwelling District. Neighborhood: The site is located within the North Highlands Civic Association. Proposed Development: The applicant is proposing to construct 20 townhouses off of North Vance Street. The development is proposed to contain four sticks (rows) of five townhouses per row. The first stick of five units would be oriented towards Lee Highway. The second stick would be oriented north, away from Lee Highway. These two rear-loaded sticks would share a common parking access drive off of North Vance Street. This parking access drive would be covered by a landscaped deck. The third and fourth sticks would follow a similar pattern. The applicant s previous proposal called for the construction of a new a single-family home at 1926 North Vance Street that would be included as part of the site plan. This new single family home has been removed from the proposal and guest parking will be constructed on 1926 North Vance Street. The single-family home at 2000 North Vance is not part of the site plan area and it will remain. The following table sets forth the preliminary statistical summary for the proposed site plan: Z , SP #

4 Current By-Right Allowable ( R15-30T ) Proposed Site Area - Total Residential 32,521 SF (.75 acres) RA8-18 (5,607 SF) 36 DUA R-5 (26,914 SF) 8 DUA 32,521 SF (.75 acres) 30 DUA 32,521 SF (.75 acres) 26.7DUA Density Residential 6 units 22 units 20 units Height RA8-18 = R-5 = Parking Z , SP # RA8-18 = spaces per unit R-5 = 1 space per unit 2.2 spaces per townhouse unit = 44 spaces required 40 spaces (20 THs) 5 guest spaces 45 Total Spaces LEED Score NA NA 24 Site and Design: The applicant is proposing to construct two 10-unit groupings of townhouses. The first grouping will have five units facing the direction of Lee Highway. An access drive to rear-loaded garages will separate these five units from the other five units in this grouping. The second set of five units will face northward (away from Lee Highway) and also be rear-loaded. The access drive between the two sets of units in this grouping will be covered by a landscaped deck. This elevated deck will be accessible from the second floor of the townhouses. Additional access to the deck will from a stairway along the western property line. Vehicular access to the drive alley will be off of North Vance Street, with a controlled access door. There is additional pedestrian access to the parking area via doorways along the western edge of the property. The end units along North Vance Street have individual pedestrian entrances located at grade off of North Vance Street. The other units are accessed from paved pedestrian walks that are perpendicular to North Vance Street. A second 10-unit grouping of townhouses will be located north of the first grouping. This grouping will be configured identically to the first grouping. A 25-foot landscaped area with pedestrian walkway will separate the two groupings. North of the second grouping of townhouses, a guest parking area is proposed. This lot will have five (5) standard parking spaces. The northern edge of the paved parking area is to be placed a minimum of ten feet (10 ) from the northern property line (shared with 2000 North Vance Street). Landscaping will surround the parking area and the lot will be accessed off of North Vance Street. The applicant is currently proposing to construct a six foot (6 ) high board-on-board fence along the property line shared with 2000 North

5 Vance Street and to plant trees in the area between the paved parking area and the fence. The project could be significantly improved if the applicant constructed a stone masonry wall (similar in character to the wall along the western property line) in place of the board-on-board fence. Additionally, the project would be improved if this wall was placed five feet (5 ) from the northern property line, with trees planted on both sides of the wall. The applicant has not agreed to this condition (Condition #54). Along the western property line, the applicant has proposed a seven foot masonry wall. The applicant has agreed to provide access through this wall if the adjacent block is redeveloped in a similar fashion. In order to further enhance the appearance of the area, the applicant has agreed to provide $3,990 for public art improvements. Parking: 40 spaces are proposed within the townhouse development and 5 visitor spaces are provided in a lot at the northern end of the development. LEED Scorecard: The applicant commits to achieving 24 LEED points in the proposed project. Transportation: The subject site is located in the 1900 block of North Vance Street, immediately north of Lee Highway. The Master Transportation Plan classifies Lee Highway and North Vance Street as a Principal Arterial and Neighborhood Minor street, respectively. Adjacent to the site, Lee Highway (U.S. 29) is constructed as a six lane divided facility and is owned and regulated by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). On street parking is allowed along both sides of North Vance Street and prohibited along Lee Highway. Adjacent to the site, North Vance Street operates one-way northbound between Lee Highway and North and two-way between and 20th Street. Access to the site is limited to left and right turns from east and westbound Lee Highway, respectively. North of the site, North Vance Street terminates at 20th Street North. 20th Street North is technically an unimproved alley and provides access between North Wayne and Adams Street to the west. Egress from the site and the one-way northbound section is available from 20 th Street which connects with North Veitch Street that allows for access back to Lee Highway at a traffic signal controlled intersection. Trip Generation: The Department of Environmental Services does not take regular traffic counts in the immediate area of the subject site plan as part of its regular traffic counting program. Special traffic counts were taken in the vicinity of the site and they are detailed below. Traffic Volumes Street 24-Hour Count North Vance Highway 43 20th Street North Wayne Street 48 North Wayne Lee Highway th Street North Vance Street 16 Z , SP #

6 Source: Arlington County Department of Environmental Services Trip generation estimates for the existing and proposed development are detailed below. Vehicle Trips Development Density Peak Hour Existing 6 dwelling units 3 Proposed 20 dwelling units 11 Increase 15 dwelling units 8 The site currently contains six (6) single-family detached dwelling units, which are estimated to generate three peak hour vehicle trips. The twenty (20) unit development is estimated to generate 11 peak hour vehicle trips. The proposed development would have minimal impact on the adjacent street system. Parking: The parking requirement for R15-30T town house developments is 2.2 parking spaces per dwelling unit for the town houses. The applicant has proposed to construct two separate underground parking structures for the town house development that will be accessed by two separate driveway entrances off of North Vance Street. Two of the driveways provide access to two sets of 10 town houses. A third driveway entrance accesses a guest parking lot. All residential units will be provided with two parking spaces per unit. The previous design provided for spaces that were 8 ½ foot wide. The revised proposal eliminates the dividing walls, resulting in spaces that are 9 foot wide and that are more easily accessed. Additionally, a total of seven guest parking spaces (four standard, three compact) will be provided. On-street parking is currently provided along the west side of North Vance Street adjacent to the site and the number of on-street parking spaces will not be reduced by this project. Streets: The subject site has frontage along North Vance Street which intersects with 20th Street North, which is technically an alley because of the limited public right-of-way width which provides egress from the site to other public streets. North Vance Street currently lacks sidewalk, curb, and gutter along approximately one-half of its length between Lee Highway and 20th Street North. As previously described, North Vance Street currently exists and is planned to continue to operate as a one-way street in the northbound direction with on-street parking along both sides of the street within a 25- to 30-foot width paved area. The planned width for North Vance Street is a thirty-foot width between the face of curbs which provides two 8-foot parking lanes and a 14-foot wide, single northbound travel lane. The applicant will construct new curb, gutter and sidewalk along the North Vance Street site frontage. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to construct curb and gutter where it does not exist along the east side of North Vance Street. 20th Street North between North Wayne Street and North Vance Street exists within a 14-foot wide public right-of-way dedication. Improvements within the right-of-way are limited to a surface treated asphalt travel way which varies in width with an average width of ten feet. The Z , SP #

7 applicant has agreed to improve 20 Road North as a new asphalt travel way between North Vance and Wayne Streets. 20 th Street North between North Vance Street and North Veitch Street exists within a 20-foot wide public right-of-way dedication. Improvements within the right-of-way are also limited to a surface treated asphalt travel way which varies in width from 14 feet to 16 feet. Pedestrian Access: The applicant has proposed to provide a twelve foot wide streetscape section along North Vance Street along the west side. The streetscape section provides a six-foot wide clear sidewalk, a four-foot wide utility/planting strip with street trees adjacent to the curb, and a two-foot planting strip between the sidewalk and the proposed structures. Staff recommends that the applicant provide Carlyle street lights (12 feet high) along the North Vance Street frontage. The applicant has proposed to construct new streetscape along Lee Highway, from North Vance Street approximately 110 feet to the west which aligns with the site s rear property line. The streetscape section includes a six-foot wide clear sidewalk and a five-foot wide utility/planting strip adjacent to the curb. Staff recommends that the applicant provide Carlyle lights (16 feet high) along the improved portion of Lee Highway frontage. Public Transit: Public transportation is available near the site. The property is located approximately one-half mile from the Courthouse Metrorail Station which is served by the Metrorail Orange Line. ART Bus service is also available near the site. ART Route #62 runs adjacent to the site along Lee Highway and provides service between Ballston Metrorail Station and the Rosslyn Metrorail Station. Metrobus Route #3ABEY and #15L provides service from along Lee Highway from Falls Church to the District of Columbia. Bicycle Access: There are several on and off-street bicycle facilities located near the site. The Custis Memorial Trail (I-66) is located just north of the site and can be accessed near 20 th Street and North Veitch Street. The Custis Memorial Trail provides access to the Washington and Old Dominion Trail to the west and the Mount Vernon Trail to the south. The Mount Vernon Trail provides connections to the south along the George Washington Memorial Parkway and to the District of Columbia via the Potomac River bridges. Utilities: Adequate water and sanitary sewer capacity is available to serve the proposed development. To ensure adequate water pressure for domestic and fire protection, staff recommends that the developer construct a new eight-inch water main to serve the site across the frontage of the site and connected with the water main in Lee Highway and 20 th Street. Consistent with site plan development and the Utility Undergrounding Plan, staff recommends the developer contribute to the Utility Underground Fund at a rate of $1,667 per unit and to remove or relocate existing aerial utilities located along the site frontage. The total one-time contribution would be $33,340 for the 20 proposed townhouse units. The developer will be required to comply with the new Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance and the Plan of Z , SP #

8 Development requirements, including a Resource Protection Area Delineation (site is not located in an RPA), a Landscape Conservation Plan, a Stormwater Management Plan, and an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. DISCUSSION: Zoning and General Land Use Plan: The proposed project is not consistent with the existing zoning on the subject site; therefore the applicant has requested a rezoning from R-5 and RA8-18 to R15-30T which is compatible with the site s existing Low-Medium Residential General Land Use Plan (GLUP) designation. According to the Zoning Ordinance, the intent of the R15-30T district is to provide for low-rise one-family townhouse development within metro corridors or other appropriate areas that are planned Low Residential (11-15 units per acre) or Low-Medium Residential on the General Land Use Plan (GLUP). The site in question is designated Low-Medium Residential on the GLUP. The site is located just outside of the Courthouse Metro Station Area and is less than one-half mile from the Courthouse Metro Station. The R15-30T district allows the same by-right options as the R-5 district, however, it allows a site plan option for townhouses at up to 30 units per acre on sites of 17,424 square feet or larger. The site in question is 32,521 square feet. Adopted Plans and Policies: General Land Use Plan: The site is designated Low-Medium Residential (16-36 units per acre) on the General Land Use Plan. The proposed density of the project is generally consistent with this designation. The actual density of the proposed project is approximately 26.7 units per acre. Affordable Housing: The applicant has proposed to make a contribution to the County s Housing Reserve Fund in the amount of $198,286 for this proposed project of 39,657 SF. The applicant s affordable housing contribution was agreed to prior to the issuance of the affordable housing roundtable guidelines and the subsequent adoption of the affordable housing ordinance. Under the new guidelines, the contribution would be $77,326. One-half of the contribution will be due prior to the issuance of the final building permit and the remaining half will be due prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. (Condition #46) LEED Scorecard: The applicant commits to achieving 24 LEED points in the proposed project. The applicant s commitment exceeds what has generally been achieved for previous town house projects. Community Process: The applicant has met several times with the members of the North Highland Civic Association and the immediate neighborhood. The Site Plan Review Committee held five meetings to review this project. Throughout the site plan review process, members of the neighborhood have been divided in their opinions on the project. Transportation Commission: On November 3, 2005, the project was presented to the Transportation Commission. At that time, the Commission voted to make no recommendation Z , SP #

9 for the site plan. The project went before the Transportation Commission for a second time on January 5, The Commission voted unanimously to approve the project. However, the Commission s motion included the following recommendation: The applicant should reconfigure the proposed visitor parking. The Commission recommended that the applicant provide six (6) standard size parking spaces in place of the proposed four (4) standard and three (3) compact spaces. The Commission further noted that the reconfiguration of the visitor parking should not result in an increase in site coverage. o Staff Response: Following a recommendation from the Planning Commission, the lot has been reconfigured to allow additional landscaping area adjacent to the northern property line. The newly configured lot contains only standard size spaces (as recommended by the TC), however, only 5 spaces were able to be accommodated in consideration of the additional landscaped area. Planning Commission: On November 7, 2005 the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed site plan. A motion to deny the project failed Discussion related to this motion centered on the project s design and on the fact that the project may be able to be enhanced through additional consolidation. Additionally, it was noted that development of this portion of the block could limit the redevelopment options for the remainder of the block. A motion to defer the project to the January 2006 County Board meeting passed 10-1 with several recommendations including the following: A condition should be added to require the applicant to provide pedestrian links through the site in the event that the adjacent properties on North Wayne Street are redeveloped as townhouses. o Staff Response: Condition #52 has been added. Doors should be added to the trash alcoves on the townhouses. o Staff Response: The applicant has agreed to make this change and the change is reflected in the current version of the proposal. The Commission requested an evaluation of the applicant s proposed art contribution of $3,990. o Staff Response: Staff was unable to identify any recent townhouse site plan that had made a public art contribution. The applicant s proposed contribution is equal to approximately $200 per unit. Mid- and high-rise site plans approved in the past 24 months have contributed amounts varying between $187 and $520 per unit. The Commission was concerned about storm water management issues and cited the need for curb and gutter improvements along the east side of North Vance Street. Z , SP #

10 Z , SP # o Staff Response: The applicant has agreed to install concrete curb and gutter where it currently does not exist along the east side of North Vance Street. Condition #16 has been modified to reflect this change. Additionally, the applicant has agreed to work with the homeowner at 2000 North Vance Street and investigate the potential benefits of lengthening the wall along the homeowner s property line. The Commission expressed a desire to see improvements made to the architecture of the two end units that face Lee Highway. Specifically, there was a desire to see improvements to the northeast and southeast corner of this building. o Staff Response: The applicant has revised this portion of the project. The applicant has agreed to have the existing single-family homes deconstructed as part of an educational exercise and to make any historical and other materials available for salvage. The Commission suggested that additional language be added to the conditions to make this clearer. o Staff Response: Condition #47 has been modified to clarify this matter. The Commission noted that the landscaping along the proposed wall separating the proposed site plan from the houses on North Wayne Street is of particular importance. o Staff Response: The applicant s landscape plan indicates significant landscaping in this area. If the project is approved, County staff will review the final landscape plan. The applicant has agreed to resurface 20 th Street North between North Wayne Street and North Vance Street. It was noted that there is a mature elm tree at the corner of 20 th Street North and North Vance Street that could be impacted by resurfacing of this roadway. o Staff Response: The previous staff recommendation was to have the existing right-of-way resurfaced to a width of 14 feet. This recommendation has been modified and the current recommendation is for the road to be resurfaced to a width of 11 feet at North Wayne, tapering to nine (9) feet at North Vance. These reduced dimensions will prevent the resurfacing from having undue impact on the referenced elm tree. Furthermore, it will minimize potential conflicts with existing structures. There was concern expressed that the proposed garage configuration may present a fire hazard. o Staff Response: Similar projects have been approved and built within Arlington. The proposed parking area will contain fire suppression sprinklers. Furthermore, the Fire Marshall s office has stated that the proposed design does not conflict with existing fire codes. The revised project went before the Planning Commission for a second time on January 9, 2006.

11 The Commission voted to recommend approval of the revised proposal. The motion adopted by the Commission included the following recommendation: Reconfigure the guest parking area so that there would be at least 10 feet of landscaped buffer between the edge of the paved area and the property line for the single-family home located at 2000 North Vance Street. The motion stated that reducing the number of guest spaces in order to accommodate this change should be allowed provided that in no case should there be less than four (4) guest spaces. o Staff Response: The parking area has been reconfigured to allow 10 feet of landscaped area and 5 standard parking spaces. The Code of Virginia requires that notice of a change in the zoning map classification of twentyfive (25) or fewer parcels be given to the owners, their agent or occupant of abutting properties at least five (5) days before the Planning Commission hearing. Staff has determined that the notice for the January 9, 2006 Planning Commission meeting did not comply with this requirement. Therefore, staff is recommending that the project be deferred to the February 6, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and the February 25, 2006 County Board meeting. County Board: The County Board reviewed the project on November 15, The County Board deferred consideration of the project citing issues related primarily to parking. The Board noted that the supply of visitor parking should be increased and that access to visitor parking should be improved. Additionally, the Board noted that the layout of the enclosed parking spaces could be improved. The Board noted that an improved parking arrangement may be achieved through a slight reduction in density. In response to the County Board s comments, the applicant has revised the proposed site plan. The applicant has eliminated one unit and provided additional visitor parking. The previous proposal included four (4) visitor spaces. The current proposal includes five (5) visitor spaces. Secondly, access to visitor parking has been improved. Previously, visitor spaces were evenly divided between the two enclosed parking areas. The revised proposal has all visitor spaces in one consolidated location with direct street access. Additionally, the applicant eliminated dividing walls within the enclosed parking areas to provide additional width and easier access to parking spaces. Finally, the applicant has eliminated all tandem parking spaces, further improving the utility of the parking supply. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the rezoning and site plan requests be deferred to the February 6, 2006 Planning Commission meeting and the February 25, 2006 County Board meeting in order to ensure proper notification of abutting property owners. Z , SP #

12 Should the County Board choose to approve the project, staff recommends that the project be approved with the following conditions. Note: Where a particular County office is specified in these conditions, the specified office includes any functional successor to that office. Where the County Manager is specified in these conditions, County Manager includes the County Manager s designee. The following Conditions of site plan approval (#1 through #11) are valid for the life of the site plan and must be met by the developer before issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit. 1. The developer (as used in these conditions, the term developer shall mean the owner, the applicant and all successors and assigns) agrees to comply with the standard conditions set forth below and as referenced in Administrative Regulation 4.1 and the revised plans dated January 10, 2006 and reviewed and approved by the County Board and made a part of the public record on January 21, 2006, including all renderings, drawings, and presentation boards presented during public hearings, together with any modifications proposed by the developer and accepted by the County Board or vice versa. Z , SP # This site plan approval expires 3 years after the date of County Board approval if a building permit has not been issued for the first building to be constructed pursuant to the approved plan. Extension of this approval shall be at the sole discretion of the County Board. The owner agrees that this discretion shall include a review of this site plan and its conditions for their compliance with then current County policies for land use, zoning and special exception uses. Extension of the site plan is subject to, among other things, inclusion of amended or additional site plan conditions necessary to bring the plan into compliance with then current County policies and standards together with any modifications proposed by the owner and accepted by the County Board or vice versa. 2. The developer agrees to conduct a pre-construction meeting, and to coordinate participation in the pre-construction meeting by relevant County staff, including staff from the Departments of Community Planning, Housing and Development (DCPHD) (Planning, Zoning, Inspection Services); Transportation (DOT); Parks, Recreation and Community Resources (DPRCR); Environmental Services (DES); and others as necessary, prior to the issuance of any permits for the site plan. The purpose of the preconstruction meeting is to discuss the requirements of the site plan conditions. 3. Tree Protection and Replacement a. The developer agrees to complete a tree survey, which shows existing conditions of the site and locates and identifies all trees consistent with the Tree Replacement Guidelines. The survey shall include any tree on adjacent sites whose dripline extends onto the subject site.

13 b. The developer agrees to file and implement a tree protection plan for any trees proposed to be saved by the developer or specified to be saved by the approved site plan and shown on any filing in connection with this case. This plan shall include any tree on adjacent sites whose dripline extends onto the subject site. The tree protection plan shall be developed by a certified arborist or other horticultural professional with a demonstrated expertise in tree protection techniques on urban sites and shall be submitted and approved, and found by the County Manager or his designee to meet the requirements of this site plan, before the issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit. At a minimum, this plan shall include: (1) A site grading plan at 2 foot intervals, including the location of all proposed improvements and utilities. (2) Detailed specifications for any tree walls or wells proposed. (3) A description of how and where building materials and equipment will be stored during construction to ensure that no compaction occurs within the critical root zone of the trees to be saved. (4) Identification of tree protection measures and delineation of placement of tree protection. (5) Any tree required to be saved which dies (any tree which is 30% or more dead shall be considered to have died) shall be removed and replaced by the developer at his expense with the number of major deciduous and evergreen trees consistent with the Tree Replacement Guidelines and which meet the minimum size and other requirements of Condition #13 below. c. The developer also agrees to replace all trees, as shown on the Tree Survey, that are removed as a result of the new construction in accordance with the Arlington County Tree Replacement Guidelines. The developer agrees to submit tree replacement calculations and a tree replacement plan in accordance with the Arlington County Tree Replacement Guidelines. The tree replacement calculations shall be developed by a certified arborist or other horticultural professional with a demonstrated expertise in assessing the condition of trees. Any replacement trees shall conform to the standards and specifications set forth in Condition #13a below and shall be installed on the project site or on Countyowned land, determined by the County Manager or his designee. The developer agrees to submit and obtain approval of this plan by the County Manager or his designee as part of the final site development and landscape plan. Z , SP #

14 4. The developer agrees to produce a photographic record of development, starting with a record of the site as it appears before demolition is begun, including photographic records during construction, and ending with a photographic record of the development as it appears after completion of construction. These photographs shall comply with the following specifications: Z , SP # All photographic records shall be taken using black and white film. Submission of a photo contact sheet and 8" x 10" prints on photographic paper shall be the minimum acceptable standard. Color photographs on compact disc must be submitted in addition to black and white photographs and the photo contact sheet at the end of the project prior to the issuance of the Master Certificate of Occupancy. The photographic record shall include the following: a. Before Clearing, Grading and Demolition of the site (shall be submitted before issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit) Views of north, south, east and west facades, as location permits, of buildings to be demolished, as well as at least one photo of the site before any clearing or grading including the existing physical relationship with adjacent buildings and streets. The photographic record shall also include all historic aspects of the facades of the building to be demolished, consistent with the requirements described in Condition #38 below. b. Site Clearance (shall be submitted before issuance of the Footing to Grade Permit) Views of cleared site facing north, south, east and west, as location permits, with adjacent buildings and streets included. c. Construction Phase (shall be submitted before issuance of the Shell and Core Certificate of Occupancy Permit) At a minimum, views of the site: during excavation, upon completion of the first floor above grade, at topping out, and during the exterior cladding phase. d. Site Completion (shall be submitted before issuance of the Master Certificate of Occupancy) North, south, east and west facades of completed building or buildings, as well as at least one view of completed project in context of adjacent buildings and streets. The photographic record of the site as it appears before demolition shall be delivered to the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of a clearing, grading or demolition permit. The remaining records, including the completed compact disc with the entire photographic history, shall be delivered to the Zoning Administrator, before the issuance of a Master Certificate of Occupancy, for placement in the County archives. If the developer uses the "Fast Track" Permit Process, the Site Clearance and

15 Construction Phase photographs shall be submitted before the issuance of the Footing to Grade Structure Permit, or the first Building Permit, whichever comes first. The Construction Phase photographs, showing any construction to grade, shall be submitted before the Final Building Permit. The Construction Phase photographs showing all construction above grade and the Site Completion Photographs and completed compact disc showing the entire photographic history of the site shall be submitted before issuance of the Master Certificate of Occupancy. 5. In addition to funding and constructing the utility undergrounding work, the developer agrees to contribute in the amount specified in Site Plan conditions to the County utility fund before the issuance of the Building Permit or prorated consistent with an approved phasing plan for the development. The total utility fund contribution for this site is $33,340 ($1,667 x 20 units). These funds may, but need not, be used by the County for the purpose of providing the undergrounding of utilities along the properties which are not redeveloping in this undergrounding district. If the area of the site plan is subdivided, the contribution to be made by each owner shall be based proportionally on the amount of site area allocated to each subdivided parcel. The contribution, if not obligated by the County to pay for utility undergrounding projects within 10 years from the date of payment, will be refunded without any accrued interest to the development owners of record at the time of any refund. 6. The developer agrees to develop a plan for temporary pedestrian and vehicular circulation during construction. This plan shall identify temporary sidewalks, interim lighting, fencing around the site, construction vehicle routes, and any other feature necessary to ensure safe pedestrian and vehicular travel around the site during construction. The developer agrees to submit this plan to, and obtain approval of the plan from, the County Manager or his designee as meeting these standards, before the issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit. The County Manager may approve amendments to the plan, if consistent with this approval. 7. The developer agrees to coordinate with the Arlington County Relocation Program Coordinator in order to provide each rental household living in either an apartment unit or a single-family dwelling which is displaced by the construction of this site plan, except those who sign initial leases for a unit in the project after the date of this site plan approval, with at least the following: a. A minimum of 120 days written notice to vacate. b. Relocation payments, in accordance with the Arlington County Tenant Relocation Guidelines adopted by the County Board and in effect on January 21, 2006, a copy of which are attached to the report of the County Manager for this site plan approval. Z , SP #

16 c. Relocation services in accordance with the Arlington County Tenant Relocation Guidelines adopted by the County Board and in effect on January 21, Z , SP # If the developer decides to limit relocation benefits to persons who executed initial leases before adoption of the site plan, the developer agrees to notify, in writing any tenant moving in after the date that the site plan is approved of his/her ineligibility for relocation payments and services. Any tenant who has not signed a waiver of rights to relocation assistance must receive the assistance. In cases where State law requires 120-day notice to vacate (displacement from multi-family buildings containing four or more units), notice cannot be waived, but may be reduced by mutual agreement in writing. Compliance with this condition shall be shown before the issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit. 8. The developer agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations not modified by the County Board's action on this plan and to obtain all necessary permits. In addition, the developer agrees to comply with all of the agreed-upon conditions approved by the County Board as a part of this site plan approval. The County has the authority to take actions to include issuance of a stop work order when the developer is not in compliance with the agreed-upon conditions. Further, temporary Certificates of Occupancy will not be issued without approval by the Zoning Administrator. 9. The developer agrees to file three copies of a site plan and the tabular information form, and digital copies on compact disc in JPEG, PDF, and DXF formats, which complies with the final approval of the County Board and with Administrative Regulation 4.1, with the Zoning Administrator within 90 days of the County Board approval and before the issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit. 10. The developer agrees to comply with the following before issuance of the Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit and to remain in compliance with this condition until the Master Certificate of Occupancy is issued. a. The developer agrees to identify a person who will serve as liaison to the community throughout the duration of construction. This individual shall be on the construction site throughout the hours of construction, including weekends. The name and telephone number of this individual shall be provided in writing to residents, property managers and business owners whose property abuts the site, and to the Zoning Administrator, and shall be posted at the entrance of the project. b. Before commencing any clearing or grading of the site, the developer shall hold a meeting with those whose property abuts the project to review the construction hauling route, location of construction worker parking, plan for temporary pedestrian and vehicular circulation, and hours and overall schedule for

17 Z , SP # construction. The developer agrees to provide documentation to the Zoning Administrator of the date, location and attendance of the meeting before a Clearing, Grading and Demolition Permit is issued. Copies of plans or maps showing the construction hauling route, construction worker parking and temporary pedestrian and vehicular circulation shall be posted in the construction trailer and given to each subcontractor and construction vehicle operator before they commence work on the project. c. Throughout construction of the project, the developer agrees to advise abutting property owners in writing of the general timing of utility work in abutting streets or on-site that may affect their services or access to their property. d. At the end of each work day during construction of the project, the developer agrees to ensure that any streets used for hauling construction materials and entrance to the construction site are free of mud, dirt, trash, allaying dust, and debris and that all streets and sidewalks adjacent to the construction site are free of trash and debris. e. The developer agrees that construction activity, except for construction worker arrival to the construction site and indoor construction activity, will commence no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and end by 6:30 p.m. on weekdays and will commence no earlier than 10:00 a.m. and end by 6:30 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. Holidays are defined as New Year s Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas. Indoor construction activity defined as activity occurring entirely within a structure fully enclosed on all sides by installed exterior walls, windows, and/or doors shall end at midnight each day, and any such activity that occurs after 6:30 p.m. shall not annoy or disturb reasonable persons of normal sensitivities. The developer agrees to place a minimum of one sign per street front indicating the permissible hours of construction around the construction site, to place one additional sign within the construction trailer containing the same information, and to provide a written copy of the permissible hours of construction to all subcontractors. f. Storage of construction materials, equipment and vehicles shall occur on the site or an approved off-site location, or as approved by the County Manager or his designee. 11. The developer agrees to provide a plan for diverting from landfill disposal the demolition, construction, and land clearing debris generated by the project. As a goal, the plan should outline recycling and/or reuse for 50 percent of the waste generated during demolition/construction. The plan should outline specific waste streams and identify the means by which waste will be managed (reused, reprocessed on site, removed by licensed haulers for reuse/recycling, etc.). The plan must include letters

18 from contracted haulers, reprocessors, and recyclers indicating that they are able to manage waste from the project. Z , SP #

19 The following Conditions of site plan approval (#12 through #31) are valid for the life of the site plan and must be met by the developer before issuance of the Excavation/Sheeting and Shoring Permit. 12. The developer agrees to submit to the Zoning Administrator and obtain approval from the County Manager a detailed final site development plan and a landscape plan prior to issuance of the Excavation/Sheeting and Shoring Permit. The final site development plan and landscape plan shall be submitted at a scale of 1 inch = 25 feet, in conjunction with the final site engineering plan as required in Condition #15 below, as well as a vicinity map with major streets labeled. The landscape plan shall be developed by, and display the professional seal of, a landscape architect certified to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The developer further agrees that both the final site development and landscape plan and the site engineering plan verify by means of survey that there are no conflicts between the street trees and utilities. The developer shall obtain approval by the County Manager or his designee for both plans as meeting all requirements of the County Board's site plan approval and all applicable county laws and plans before the issuance of the Excavation/Sheeting and Shoring Permit. The plan shall be consistent with the conceptual landscape plan approved as a part of the site plan, and, at a minimum, shall conform to the landscaping requirements in Condition #13 below; the Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor Streetscape Standards if applicable; the Sector Plans if applicable; the County's landscaping, planting, and sidewalk and driveway construction specifications; and/or other applicable urban design standards approved by the County Board. In order to facilitate comparison with the final site engineering plan, the landscape plan shall be at a scale of 1 inch = 25 feet; the County may require more detailed plans appropriate to landscape installation at a larger scale. The County may permit minor changes in building, street and driveway locations and other details of design as necessitated by more detailed planning and engineering studies if such changes are consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance governing administrative approval and with the intent of the site plan approval. The landscape plan shall include a Street Tree Plan which shall be reviewed by DPRCR and DCPHD, and shall be accompanied by the site engineering plan. The installation of all plant materials shown on the final landscape plan shall take place before the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the respective phase of construction. The final site development and landscape plan shall include the following details: a. The location and dimensions of traffic signal poles and control cabinets, utility meters, utility vaults and boxes, transformers, mechanical equipment, fire hydrants, standpipes, storm water detention facilities, the location of all existing and proposed utility lines and of all easements. The location of traffic control cabinets shall be shown on the final site engineering plan and placed so as not to obstruct pedestrian travel or be visually obtrusive. Traffic control cabinets shall not be located in the public sidewalk. Transformers shall not be placed above grade in the setback area between the building and the street. Z , SP #

20 Z , SP # b. Intake and exhaust garage ventilation grates may not be located within public sidewalks or streets, or within areas between the street curb and any building which is used as a walkway. The developer agrees to provide drawings showing how the garage will be ventilated prior to submission of the post-county Board Administrative Regulation 4.1 drawings required in Condition #10 above. Ventilation grates shall be located and/or screened so as not to be visible from public rights-of-way. The developer shall obtain approval from the County Manager or his designee on the location and screening of all ventilation grates as part of the review of the final site engineering plan and the final site development and landscape plan before issuance of the Footing to Grade Permit. c. The location, dimensions, and materials, and pavement pattern, where applicable, for driveways and access drives, automobile drop-off areas, driveway aprons, service drives, parking areas, interior walkways and roadways, plaza areas and sidewalks, as well as for address indicator signs. Brick or a concrete unit paver shall be used on the access drives, automobile drop-off areas, plaza areas, and interior walkways and roadways. Interior walkways shall have a minimum width of 4 feet. All plaza areas shall contain special paver treatments that coordinate in design, color and materials with the treatment of the public sidewalk. The materials and colors used are subject to approval by the County Manager or his designee according to adopted Sector Plans or other urban design standards approved by the County Board as a part of review and approval of the final site development and landscape plan. d. The location and types of light fixtures for streets, parking, walkway and plaza areas, and associated utilities, as contained in the lighting plan required in Condition #37 below. e. Topography at 2 foot intervals, and the finished first floor elevation of all structures, and top-of-slab elevation for any proposed underground structures. f. Landscaping for open space areas, plaza areas, courtyards, raised planters (including cross-sections of raised planters), surface parking areas, and service drives, including a listing of plant materials; details of planting, irrigation and drainage; and details of proposed furnishings for all areas, including but not limited to dimensions, size, style(s), materials(s), finish(es) and manufacturer(s) of seating, bollards, trash receptacles, bike racks, arbors, trellises, and water features, and other landscape elements or structures. g. The location and planting details for street trees in accordance with Department of Transportation Standards and Specifications for planting in public rights-of-way and as shown on the approved final site engineering plan. h. The limits of demolition and construction.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 27, 2007 DATE: January 12, 2007 SUBJECT: U-3101-04-2 Use Permit Review for drive-through facilities; premises known as 5222 Lee Highway

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012 DATE: July 12, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #416 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to modify condition #6 to eliminate requirement to provide a pedestrian

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 DATE: September 11, 2015 SUBJECTS: Outdoor Café at Citizen Burger Bar A. SP# 418 Site Plan Amendment to modify an approved

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012 DATE: July 3, 2012 SUBJECT: U-3120-05-2 USE PERMIT AMENDMENT for softball and multipurpose field with lighting, grandstand,

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 23, 2004 DATE: October 6, 2004 SUBJECT: SP #106-3 Site Plan Amendment for changes to façade, plaza deck, landscaping, number of units,

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018 DATE: June 7, 2018 SUBJECT: Z-2604-18-1 Rezoning from R-6 and R-5 Single Family Residential Districts to S-3A Special District

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 10, 2014 DATE: May 1, 2014 SUBJECT: SP #105 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to modify several site plan conditions for Phase 3 of the Metropolitan

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017 DATE: July 7, 2017 SUBJECT: U-3241-09-02 Use Permit Amendment for interior modifications to increase the design capacity of

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 10, 2012 DATE: February 29, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #197 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to add a new condition #25 to allow a new use for a Yoga and Pilates

More information

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional) Rezoning Petition 2016-117 Zoning Committee Recommendation January 4, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional) LOCATION

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 10, 2004 DATE: June 30, 2004 SUBJECT: SP #380 SITE PLAN (CARRY-OVER) for five town homes with existing dwelling located at 4717 North

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 15, 2017 DATE: July 7, 2017 SUBJECT: U-3060-03-2 USE PERMIT AMENDMENT for interior modifications to increase the design capacity of and

More information

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (from PD-H1 Planned

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 23, 2019 DATE: April 12, 2019 SUBJECT: SP #413 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to permit a fixed bar in a private outdoor café space with associated

More information

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued. N MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C- FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER 04-00 Project No. 496 Issued Revised SCALE: " = 0' N 0 0 0 40 RZ. c GENERAL PROVISIONS: a. SITE LOCATION.

More information

CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE

CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE CHESAPEAKE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE CONSERVATION PRESERVATION CZO 19-600 Effective October 16, 2008 BUFFER YARD C PARKING LOT REFORESTATION YEAR 1 REFORESTATION YEAR 4 BUFFER YARD F CBPA REFORESTATION Page

More information

BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL

BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL 8 APPLICANT AND OWNER: MISSION ENTERPRISES, L.L.C STAFF PLANNER: Kristine Gay REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit ( Eating and Drinking Establishment within 100 of Protected District ) ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION:

More information

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan

Project phasing plan (if applicable) 12 copies of site plan SITE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT APPLICATION City of Grand Haven, 11 N. Sixth Street, Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: (616) 847-3490 Fax: (616) 844-2051 Website: www.grandhaven.org 1. Project Information Address/location

More information

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides

More information

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SPECIAL LAND USE Date City Official App. Filing Fee Rec'd ($350) NOTE TO APPLICANT: Please submit this application for Site Plan Review along with twenty (20) copies

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 12, 2014 DATE: April 2, 2014 SUBJECT: to the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance, Article 11.1 "CP-FBC" Columbia Pike Form Based Code

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 23, 2019 DATE: February 15, 2019 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Map to add a new section of North Kansas

More information

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent COMMUNITY DESIGN Intent An attractive, well-designed County will attract quality development, instill civic pride, improve the visual character of the community, and create a strong, positive image for

More information

The purpose of the requirements in this Article is to provide for landscaping and screening of parking and other outdoor areas that will:

The purpose of the requirements in this Article is to provide for landscaping and screening of parking and other outdoor areas that will: XIII. LANDSCAPING & SCREENING A. Purpose The purpose of the requirements in this Article is to provide for landscaping and screening of parking and other outdoor areas that will: 1. Protect residential

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 16, 2013 DATE: October 28, 2013 SUBJECTS: A. SP #105 PHASED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for the purpose of revising Condition

More information

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan: PROPOSED AMENDMENT The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan: 1. The building footprint was modified to accommodate the revised architectural design. 2.

More information

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and, Article 5. Landscaping 5.1 Purpose The Town of Laurel Park s landscape standards are designed to create a beautiful, aesthetically pleasing built environment that will complement and enhance community

More information

From: Sent: To: Subject: Zoning: Landscaping:

From: Sent: To: Subject: Zoning: Landscaping: From: Bernard H. Berne [mailto:bhberne@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 1:18 AM To: CountyBoard Subject: May 19, 2012 County Board Meeting: Goodyear Site Plan (SP #72-650 N. Glebe Road) and amendment

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 7, 2005 (Recessed Meeting of May 31, 2005) DATE: May 27, 2005 SUBJECT: U-3120-05-1 USE PERMIT for a new high school located at 1300 N.

More information

D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing

D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing D3 January 14, 2015 Public Hearing APPLICANT: DONALD J. BOUCHER, JR. PROPERTY OWNER: D.J.B. SERVICE CENTER, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Kristine Gay REQUEST: A. Conditional Change of Zoning (I-1 to B-2) B. Conditional

More information

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017

Rezoning Petition Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017 Rezoning Petition 2017-090 Zoning Committee Recommendation August 1, 2017 REQUEST LOCATION SUMMARY OF PETITION PROPERTY OWNER PETITIONER AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE COMMUNITY MEETING STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY

More information

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George s

More information

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BEACH MUNICIPAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROPERTY OWNER: SISTERS II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agriculture

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2017-205 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development district, optional) Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O SPA (mixed use development district,

More information

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: City Staff Date: November 15, 2016 Re: Case #16026 Raymore Activity Center Site Plan GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Applicant/ Property Owner:

More information

Project Name: MELWOOD HOTEL. Date Accepted: 1/12/04. Waived. Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 1.7 Zone: Dwelling Units:

Project Name: MELWOOD HOTEL. Date Accepted: 1/12/04. Waived. Planning Board Action Limit: Plan Acreage: 1.7 Zone: Dwelling Units: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis October 2, 2018

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis October 2, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2017-205 Final Staff Analysis October 2, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development district, optional) Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O SPA (mixed use development district, optional,

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 16, 2018 DATE: June 8, 2018 SUBJECT: SP #167 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for landscape plan changes and the allocation of approximately 4,387

More information

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW 17.01 INTENT AND PURPOSE The intent of this section is to provide for consultation and cooperation between the applicant and the township planning commission so that the applicant

More information

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PROJECT SUMMARY: Project Name: City/ETA Location: City ETA (Application fee & number of copies needed are based on location) Property Location (Legal Description

More information

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN) Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 19, 2012 DATE: May 2, 2012 SUBJECT: U-3145-05-1 USE PERMIT REVIEW for a vehicle service establishment; located at (RPC# 06-018-002). Applicant:

More information

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: . 4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MID-ATLANTIC AUTO PROPERTY OWNER: DZR, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (truck rental, automobile service, and automotive/bulk

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 & PUD-0000102-2017 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 17, 2015 DATE: October 6, 2015 SUBJECT: SP #1 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT REVIEW to modify Zoning Ordinance sign requirements and facade modifications

More information

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay Applicant/Owner Ocean Rental Properties, LLC Public Hearing April 13, 2016 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 1 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront

More information

The petition proposes the development of five townhomes on a vacant parcel between Charlotte Latin School and Providence Presbyterian Church.

The petition proposes the development of five townhomes on a vacant parcel between Charlotte Latin School and Providence Presbyterian Church. Rezoning Petition 2017-202 Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: R-3 (single family residential) Proposed Zoning: UR-2(CD) (urban residential, conditional) with five-year

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting October 15, 2005 DATE: September 28, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise the adoption of the 2005 Clarendon Sector Plan C. M. RECOMMENDATION:

More information

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018

Rezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2018-028 Final Staff Analysis June 18, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: MX-1 LLWPA (mixed use district, Lower Lake Wylie Protected Area), R-3 LLWPA (single family residential, Lower Lake

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2018-018 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential), R-5 HD-O (single family residential, historic district overlay) and B-2(CD) HD-O

More information

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Special Permit Application No.

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at   Special Permit Application No. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016 # 9 ZON2016-01032 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 2, 2016 DEVELOPMENT NAME JJT Properties LLC LOCATION 1147 & 1151 East I-65 Service Road South and 1180 Sledge Drive (Southeast corner

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis March 19, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis March 19, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2017-171 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis March 19, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-3 (single family residential) Proposed Zoning: MX-2 (INNOV) (mixed used, innovative) with five-year vested

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. Date: 12-10-15 Leisure World Clubhouse II Addition Fitness Center, Limited Site Plan Amendment

More information

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: NVR Inc. Project Size: +/- 76.13 acres Parcel Numbers: 02101112,02116101,02116112, 02116113 Current Zoning: Transitional Residential

More information

Location and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:

Location and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation: R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed Special Permit Application No. SP-130008, Sudsville Laundry, requesting a special permit to construct an addition and

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2018-015 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: R-4 (single family residential) and UR-2(CD) (urban residential, conditional) Proposed Zoning: UR-2(CD)

More information

Article 7.05 Manufactured Home Park Districts

Article 7.05 Manufactured Home Park Districts Article Manufactured Home Park Districts.01 Intent The purpose of the MHP Manufactured Home Park District is to give recognition to the fact that manufactured homes can provide satisfactory living conditions

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2018-028 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST Current Zoning: MX-1 LLWPA (mixed use district, Lower Lake Wylie Protected Area), R-3 LLWPA (single family residential, Lower

More information

STAFF REPORT. April 30, 2018 May 9, 2018

STAFF REPORT. April 30, 2018 May 9, 2018 PATRICK J. SULLIVAN DIRECTOR City of New Bedford Department of Planning, Housing & Community Development 608 Pleasant St, New Bedford, Massachusetts 02740 Telephone: (508) 979.1500 Facsimile: (508) 979.1575

More information

Application for Site Plan Review

Application for Site Plan Review Application for Site Plan Review City of Pontiac Office of Land Use and Strategic Planning 47450 Woodward Ave, Pontiac, MI 48342 T: 248.758.2800 F: 248.758.2827 Property/Project Address: Sidwell Number:

More information

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS

PRELIMINARY CONDITIONAL USE SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST REQUIREMENTS This checklist must accompany your submittal as the cover page. CONDITIONAL USE Application Submittal Checklist for PRELIMINARY AND FINAL APPROVAL Per Winter Park Land Development Code Sec. 58-90 PRELIMINARY

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: Date: 5-03-18 Pike and Rose, Phase I: Site Plan Amendment No. 82012002D Rhoda Hersson-Ringskog,

More information

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by: C-I-10 PART C SECTION I ARTICLE 10 GENERAL REGULATIONS PROJECT SITE REVIEW I. Purpose The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: A. Protect streetscapes from projects that

More information

BUFFERS, TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING. Sec Purpose and Intent.

BUFFERS, TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING. Sec Purpose and Intent. ARTICLE 20 BUFFERS, TREE PROTECTION AND LANDSCAPING Sec. 20.1. Purpose and Intent. Trees improve air and water quality, reduce soil erosion, reduce noise and glare, provide habitat for desirable wildlife,

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. Date: 3.10.2016 Site Plan 820160040 Nora School Parker Smith, Planning Technician, Area 1,

More information

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA DESIGN REVIEW REPORT : CPZ-3-1 : (S) Cynthia Lee-Sheng AT LARGE: A Chris Roberts B Elton M. Lagasse ADVERTISING DATES: 06/03/1 06/10/1 06/17/1 PAB PUBLIC

More information

Construction and Landscaping on Public Property

Construction and Landscaping on Public Property Construction and Landscaping on Public Property City of Manhattan Beach Community Development Department 1400 Highland Avenue 310-802-5504 www.citymb.info January, 2004 Construction and Landscaping on

More information

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission

Staff Report. Conditional Use PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission Maryann Pickering, Principal Planner (801) 535-7660 Date: December 10, 2014 Re: Church of Scientology

More information

5.1 Commercial and Industrial Development. (Effective April 1, 2006)

5.1 Commercial and Industrial Development. (Effective April 1, 2006) 5.1 Commercial and Industrial Development. (Effective April 1, 2006) A. Applicability: The requirements of this section (5.10) shall apply to all uses within the LB Local Business; HB Highway Business;

More information

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION

VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION This perspective sketch communicates the intended character and quality of a proposed streetscape design. Locate benches near a major intersection where people tend to gather. Seating and lighting provide

More information

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings Presented To: Planning Committee Request for Decision Application for rezoning in order to permit a place of worship on a vacant lot zoned for C1, Local Commercial uses, Cam Street, Sudbury Sitiri Investments

More information

Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service Station) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara Applicant Larae Tucker Property Owner Doswell Ventures, LLC Public Hearing May 10, 2017 City Council Election District Princess Anne Agenda Item 3 Request Modification of Conditions (Automobile Service

More information

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014 CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014 Item 6, Report No. 21, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan on May

More information

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject:

APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject: Planning & Development APPLICATION BRIEFING Prepared For: Submitted by: Date: Subject: Planning Advisory Committee Jason Fox, Director of Planning & Development Development Agreement application by Godfrey

More information

2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC

2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (car wash) 2 January 13, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: AUTOBELL CAR WASH, INC PROPERTY OWNER: MESSER 1060 INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD STAFF PLANNER: Carolyn A.K. Smith ADDRESS

More information

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan)

Application Number: SD Project Name: Walton Farms Preliminary Subdivision (acting as Master Plan) STAFF REPORT Town of Clayton Planning Department 111 E. Second Street, Clayton, NC 27520 P.O. Box 879, Clayton, NC 27528 Phone: 919-553-5002 Fax: 919-553-1720 Planning Board May 22, 2017 Application Number:

More information

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM ) Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What

More information

The Town Board of the Town of Vienna, County of Dane, State of Wisconsin, does ordain and adopt as follows.

The Town Board of the Town of Vienna, County of Dane, State of Wisconsin, does ordain and adopt as follows. ORDINANCE DRIVEWAYS AND CULVERTS NO. 6-5-06 ORDINANCE CONCERNING DRIVEWAY AND CULVERT REQUIREMENTS 1-1-1 Driveway Permits; Culvert Requirements 1-1-2 Driveway and Culvert Location, Design and Construction

More information

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

Request Change in Nonconformity. Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders Applicant & Owner Public Hearing April 11, 2018 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 5 Request Change in Nonconformity Staff Recommendation Approval Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders Location

More information

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents City of Yelm Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines Table of Contents Table of Contents... 1 Purpose... 2 Low Density Residential (R4-6)... 3 Moderate Density Residential (R6-10)... 5 Neighborhood

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2017-177 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: O-2 (office) and MUDD-O (mixed use development, optional) Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development,

More information

8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing

8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing 8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: PRICE S HOLDINGS, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Lasley REQUEST: A. Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) B. Change in Nonconforming

More information

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014 Introduction / Written Statement McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville McDonald s Corporation is proposing to redevelop the existing McDonald s eating establishment with a drive-through located at 121 N

More information

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016 KASPER City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016 Applicant: Sentinel Land Company, LLC 4910 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA Prepared by: SEC Planning

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT-2 DATE: January 27, 2017 SUBJECT: The Virginia Department of Transportation s Transform I-66 Inside the

More information

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form- Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval Applicant Property Owner Steven H. Murden Public Hearing June 14, 2017 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 8 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort

More information

BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:

BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County: Attachment A AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CODE OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD, 1997, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 19.1-52, 19.1-53, 19.1-236, 19.1-247, 19.1-253, 19.1-263, 19.1-341, 19.1-346,

More information

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: From: Kelsie Anderson, PE Kelsie.Anderson@charlottenc.gov 704-432-5492 Staff Reviewer: Kory Hedrick, PE, PMP Khedrick@charlottenc.gov 704-432-6511 CDOT s review of this rezoning petition is intended to

More information

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT For Staff Use Only: DATE/TIMESTAMP: ZA# RECEIVED BY: The intent of the Master Planned District (MPD) designation is to allow flexibility in the design and construction

More information

ARTICLE 9: LANDSCAPING AND FENCING REQUIREMENTS

ARTICLE 9: LANDSCAPING AND FENCING REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE 9: LANDSCAPING AND FENCING REQUIREMENTS Section 9.01 Intent The intent of the landscaping requirements are to improve the appearance of lot areas and soften paved areas and buildings; to provide

More information

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist This checklist provides specific requirements that are apart of the Sketch process. The entire process is described by the Huntersville Subdivision Review Process which details all the submittal and resubmittal

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Robert Myers Robert Myers 2955 and 2989 Dauphin Street (Southeast corner of Dauphin Street and Sage Avenue) CITY

More information

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT PETITION INFORMATION Docket # C-226 Staff Megan Ledbetter Petitioner(s) JBJH Properties, LLC Owner(s) JBJH Properties, LLC Subject Property 5892-49-1766

More information

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District Section 4.500 Preston Road Overlay District 2004 Zoning Ordinance 4.500 Preston Road Overlay District (ZC 98-29; Ordinance No. 98-9-12) 4.501 Purpose To provide appropriate design standards for the use

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 DATE: September 11, 2015 SUBJECT: Request for an Amendment to the Master Transportation Plan Map to Add a New Segment of

More information

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015 Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015 The slides that follow identify where the draft Comprehensive Plan has

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 28, 2017 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT DATE: January 26, 2017 SUBJECT: The Virginia Department of Transportation s Transform I-66 Inside the

More information

The petition proposes to renovate two existing buildings in order to allow a mix of uses as permitted in MUDD (mixed use development).

The petition proposes to renovate two existing buildings in order to allow a mix of uses as permitted in MUDD (mixed use development). Rezoning Petition 2017-156 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis December 18, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: I-2 (general industrial) Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development, optional) with five-year vested

More information