City of Houston 2019 Houston Capital Needs Legislative Request

Transcription

1 City of Houston 2019 Houston Capital Needs Legislative Request Approved December 14, 2017 Council Resolution (S) Mayor Virgie Thompson (907) (907)

2 Legislative Funding Priorities Growing with Purpose 1. Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (Priority 1) $175, Purchase of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) and related elements. Purchase one set of SCBA and mask per riding position in each structure response apparatus (30). Also provides software upgrade and calibration for annual flow testing equipment, and certified maintenance technician training and certification for regular upkeep, as well as requisite tools per manufacturer specifications. This brings the entire fire department into compliance with the new NFPA standards and industry mandates. Current SCBA at Houston Fire Department are nearing a decade old, far exceeding the manufacturers recommended use life. Without this SCBA, HFD may be forced to limit firefighting activity to exterior operations only for safety reasons. Houston FD will match $15,000 (8.6%) to bring the project total to $190, Cheri Lake Drive Construction (Priority 2) $ 946, Reconstruct Cheri Lake Drive Provide an immediate public safety hazard on Cheri Lake Drive. Heavily used school bus route. All upgrades will bring the road in compliance with the most current Matsu Borough (MSB) and Alaska Department of Transportation (ADOT) standards for roadways. Total Project Cost: $1,424,000 Funding already secured: $477,987 Project Deficit: $946,542

3

4

5 City of Houston, Alaska Mayor s Office City of Houston Capital Improvement Plan FY2019 (CIP)* Request for Public Input Long-Term Financial Planning and Initiatives The City of Houston s strategic development is guided by several tools. City Council and management establish goals and objectives for the upcoming six years. These initiatives may include both capital projects and quality of life issues; and are revisited on an annual basis. The City s Capital Improvement Plan/Program (CIP) the FY2018 CIP was adopted on December 2016, the City Council shall adopt the FY2019 CIP by December The CIP provides a planning schedule and identifies options for financing the plan. Capital projects such as roads, parks, equipment and facilities can be adopted as part of the CIP. The City s Comprehensive Plan (the Plan) was revised and adopted in FY2017 also provides a flexible, forward-thinking road map to address important community elements. The Plan focuses on matters of transportation, land use, development, use of community assets and economic vitality. Public Comments on the FY2019 CIP can be done in the following ways: Attend Public Hearings Planning & Zoning Commission- October 26, 2017 at 7pm. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission-November 2, 2017 at 6pm. Houston City Council- November 9, 2017 at 7pm. Mayor Thompson at vthompson@houston-ak.gov. Click the links below to view the plans FY2018 CIP City s Comprehensive Plan * FY 2019 CIP (currently being evaluated, to be posted). Sincerely, CITY OF HOUSTON Mayor Virgie Thompson City of Houston, Mayor s Office P.O. Box Houston, Alaska Phone: (907) Fax: (907) mayor@houston-ak.gov Website:

6

7 Project Title: Houston - Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Purchase TPS Number: Priority: 1 Agency: Grant Recipient: Houston Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities (AS ) FY2019 State Funding Request: $175,000 One-Time Need Brief Project Description: Purchase of Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) that comply with current industry standards and workplace safety laws, training for their maintenance, and modification of station equipment to maintain and operate the SCBA. Funding Plan: Total Project Cost: $190,000 Funding Already Secured: ($15,000) FY2019 State Funding Request: ($175,000) Project Deficit: $0 Explanation of Other Funds: Houston Fire Department's operating budget includes money dedicated to equipment purchase and repair that will be used to purchase some SCBA, but $15,000 is insufficient for the minimum of equipment needed. Detailed Project Description and Justification: This Project Will Provide: Purchase SCBA that complies with new national standards of NFPA to protect the health and safety of firefighters and rescuers. This equipment will be compatible with mutual aid departments' SCBA to ensure maximum efficiency for automatic aid responses. Additionally, the project will provide for training on use, maintenance, and repair of the equipment to ensure the equipment is maintained and operated to manufacturer specification, upgrade the fire department's air cascade system at Fire Station 9-2 to refill the higher pressure bottles with Submitted to Legislature the new connection threads, and purchase hardware necessary to safely mount the SCBA to fire apparatus. Justification: Houston Fire Department responds to over 200 calls per year to the City of Houston and an automatic aid area in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough the size of some small states. Currently, responders are wearing SCBA that were manufactured in 2010 to the NFPA standard of years has brought significant changes to the NFPA standard that fire departments adhere to, including many of which cannot be addressed through an upgrade of existing hardware but require completely new gear. Failure to meet the new standard in a reasonable of time will mandate crews no longer be able to operate in fire and hazmat environments. The new standard has already been in place for 5 years. City of Houston has sought other funding mechanisms including inquiring with several local private donors, foundations, and two grant applications under Assistance to Firefighters Grant program with no success. Project Timeline: 1 month after notice of funds awarded: Contact local vendors with specifications matching mutual aid partners. 2-4 months later, purchase all equipment and schedule training sessions. 2 months later, equipment arrives and placed into service on apparatus. Entity Responsible for the Ongoing Operation and Maintenance of this Project: 10:55 AM 1/23/2018

8 City of Houston Grant Recipient Contact Information: Name: Virgie Thompson Address: W. Armstrong Rd Houston, AK Phone Number: (907) This project has been through a public review process at the local level and it is a community priority. 10:55 AM 1/23/2018

9 Fire Products Personal Protective Equipment - PPE 4 major NFPA changes to SCBA Changes to NFPA standards mean a functionality revamping for the next generation of SCBA Jun 10, 2013 Product News with Robert Avsec The standard, it is a changin' NFPA 1981: Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for Emergency Services, that is. The 2007 edition of 1981 was slated for revision in 2012, but didn't hit the street until January Why the delay? The technical committee working on NFPA 1981's revisions needed additional time to ensure the accuracy and validity of testing done by NFPA's collaborative agencies the NFPA Research Foundation, the National Institute for Standards and Technology, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety Health. The committee's extra review activity ensured that new tests for SCBA components were valid and that SCBA manufacturers would be able to comply with new requirements. Getting it right before publication was important to ensure that re departments would not be spending precious dollars today on technology that wouldn't work tomorrow. Also, the revised NFPA 1981 comes with four pretty heady changes that will a ect not only purchasing decisions, but also tactical reground considerations for re service leaders. 1. Low-air alarm The NFPA required the alarm to sound when 25 percent of the cylinder's available air was left. The 2013 edition ups that requirement to 33 percent of the cylinder's available air.

10 The 2013 edition is the rst that speci es an EOSTI level for re service SCBA. The 25 percent threshold commonly accepted for years by the re service actually came from NIOSH. And even NIOSH never had a hard and fast 25 percent; the NIOSH standard had always been a window of 20 percent to 25 percent of available air. NFPA 1404: Standard for Fire Service Respiratory Protection Training, 2013 edition, contains several requirements for individual air management when using SCBA: 1. The individual shall exit from an IDLH atmosphere before consumption of reserve air supply begins. 2. The individual shall recognize that the low air alarm noti cation indicates that the member is consuming the reserve air supply. The committee added the higher 33 percent threshold to NFPA 1981 to increase the reserve air supply available and be in line with the speci cations of NFPA The major manufacturers of SCBA are saying that they can accomplish compliance for existing SCBA through rmware upgrades for electronic EOSTI and changing spring tension on audible alarms, or the low-air bell. With all the discussions regarding air management in recent years, including whether or not 25 percent was enough of a reserve air supply, this is a step in the right direction. 2. Facepiece improvements During its work, the committee became aware of several re ghter fatality incidents where thermal degradation of the facepiece lens was a factor. The committee members looked at what facepiecelens requirements in NFPA 1981 had changed; they discovered that no changes had been made in the past 20 years. So why were lens melting? In 2012, UL released the results for its tests that compared re behavior in legacy and modern homes. Those tests provided con rmation to what many of us have been saying for years: re ghters today are dealing with fuels, heat, ashover and chemicals that we'd never experienced before. While the committee's research indicated that there wasn't a lens problem (from a standards perspective), the members felt that the lens standard had perhaps not kept pace with the changing re environment. NFPA requires the facepiece lens to be subjected to a test of radiant heat at 15 kw/m2. The previous lens testing speci cation focused on convected heat, prevalent in legacy home res, rather than the impact of radiant heat present in homes with modern fuel loads. The new test speci cations also call for the entire SCBA assembly, mounted on a test manikin and breathing cylinder air, to be subjected to a 500-degree Fahrenheit oven test. This test helps determine

11 whether the SCBA can survive a catastrophic event, like ashover, and still allow a re ghter to safely exit the building. 3. Voice intelligibility requirements Verbal communication while using SCBA continues to be a challenge. Much of the previous testing e orts in other organizations have been done with real users. While practical and easy to do, such research is very subjective so NFPA 1981 includes a new test, speech transmission index (STI). STI gives numerical values to sound and measures how a machine picks it up and receives it, so the evaluator can create a baseline that the SCBA must meet. NFPA 1981 also includes a new requirement for all SCBA facepieces to have a mechanical speaking system. Electronically enhanced communication systems can be an accessory, but all units must have a mechanical one that works independent of any power source. 4. Emergency Breathing Safety Systems (EBSS) NFPA 1981 nally provides legitimacy to EBSS buddy breathers. Previous editions of NFPA 1981 did not include references for EBSS, and NIOSH has prohibited the use of buddy breathers since So while EBSS technically didn't exist, the reality was that manufacturers were designing accessories that were ultimately used as buddy breathers and re ghters were using them as such. The committee members considered if the original prohibition by NIOSH was based on re ghter behavior or lack of an acceptable technical solution. They concluded that the original prohibition was technical, not behavioral. Among several of the technical challenges was the ability to have twice the volume of air ow to ensure adequate air ow to both users. Once the SCBA manufacturers were able to demonstrate a viable solution for that issue, the committee felt it appropriate to give EBSS a seat at the table. NIOSH lifted the prohibition on buddy breathers for structural re ghting only. As far as NFPA 1981 is concerned, EBSS will be considered an accessory they're not required but if a department chooses to have them on their SCBA, they must perform to the new standard. Now is a good time to get in contact with the manufacturer of your current SCBA to determine what needs to happen to bring your equipment into compliance with NFPA The sooner that conversation happens, the sooner you can put that information into budgeting and operational planning for your organization. About the author Batt. Chief Robert Avsec (Ret.) served with the Chester eld (Va.) Fire & EMS Department for 26 years. He was an instructor for re, EMS, and hazardous materials courses at the local, state and federal levels, which included more than 10 years with the National Fire Academy. Chief Avsec earned his bachelor s degree from the University of Cincinnati and his master s degree in executive re service leadership from Grand Canyon University. He is a 2001 graduate of the National Fire Academy's EFO Program. Contact Robert at Robert.Avsec@FireRescue1.com. Tags Health & Wellness Personal Protective Equipment Product Editorial Insights on SCBA

12 Copyright 2018 FireRescue1.com. All rights reserved.

13 Fire Products Fire SCBA MSA overhauls SCBA design with G1 The GI meets the latest NFPA 1981 standards including face piece integrity and communication Apr 9, 2014 MSA unveiled its newest SCBA, the G1, at the 2014 Fire Rescue International conference in Indianapolis. The SCBA meets the most recent safety standard changes set forth in NFPA edition, which encourages increased face piece lens integrity, new voice communication intelligibility and changes to the end-of-service time indicator. The G1 is a brand new SCBA designed from the ground-up based on customer feedback and NFPA standards, which led to needing a new architecture for the SCBA, said Ben Mauti, MSA s re service market manager. The NFPA 1981 standard the primary standard for SCBAs has been updated to include new capabilities not available on older models. These changes required new electronics to be developed and installed in the SCBA, Mauti said.

14 For example, a heads-up display is now required to meet the standards as well as high-heat resistant lenses, he said. Mauti said MSA tasked its engineers with developing an advanced design technique to remove all electronics from the face piece. The result is the G1 model that has no electronics or external components. There are no electronics on the face piece and as a result no snag hazards, he said. To improve face piece integrity, MSA engineers used a custom-blended Hycar rubber design on the G1. In addition, Mauti said the G1 face piece has been eld and high-heat tested at 500 and -30 F. He said further durability testing, such as squirrel cage and vibration table testing, will be conducted soon. Communications also have been updated. Electronic voice ampli cation now is standard on each G1. Options include Bluetooth and RFID. A Bluetooth with radio frequency pairing scheme is under development, Mauti said. Communications comes up as one of the most safety factors on the reground, so we wanted to include that standard on the SCBA, he said. MSA engineers also added seven buddy lights for 360-degree visibility of air levels. It is green until 50 percent; it then turns yellow for warning and red for emergency. Digital and analog displays on the PASS device are viewed via an LCD display with large print.

15 September 22, 2016 Dear Valued Customer, As the leading manufacturer of SCBA in the North American fire services market, Scott Safety strives to keep our valued customers informed of upcoming regulatory standard changes. There are two such standards quickly nearing completion that will affect Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA): NFPA 1981 Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for Emergency Services NFPA 1982 Standard on Personal Alert Safety Systems (PASS) The information below provides a current snapshot of the schedule and timeline for implementation of the standards: Current Schedule The standards will be marked as 2018 Edition The 2018 revision cycle is confirmed for Fall 2017 The issuance date is tentatively scheduled for November 2017 The effective date is tentatively scheduled for December 2017 The tentative last ship date for 2013 Edition SCBA would be August 31, 2018, provided the issuance date is met. There are significant areas of focus that the standards committee has reviewed as part of the development process, some of which may have an impact on SCBA manufacturers as it relates to the design and operation of the SCBA. Summary of Proposed Changes NFPA 1981: Second Stage Regular Retention & Removal o Incorporate a strength of interface test between the facepiece and second stage regulator to ensure that the second stage regulator will not inadvertently pull out of the facepiece lens o If the SCBA incorporates a removable regulator, two distinct actions for disconnection shall be required prior to removal of the regulator (i.e. pull latch and rotate regulator) Pneumatic Data Logging o Incorporate data logging of air pressure at prescribed time intervals o Incorporate data logging of pressure milestones (i.e. 100%, 75%, 50%, 33%) o Incorporate data logging of breathing rate at prescribed time intervals Universal EBSS Fitting o Incorporate a standardized EBSS fitting that would be universal between SCBA manufacturers The EBSS shall have an operating pressure range between 80 psi and 150 psi NFPA 1982: New Universal PASS Tone o Incorporate a new universal PASS tone to improve audible detection by the human ear Transmitting RF PASS o Incorporate two new tests to the RF PASS section to improve reliability For your convenience, a presentation highlighting the proposed changes to the NFPA 2018 Edition standards is available for download at

16 The First Draft Reports for NFPA 1981 and NFPA 1982 have been posted and are available for viewing through the NFPA website. The First Draft Report serves as documentation of the Input Stage and is published for public review and comment. The First Draft Report contains a compilation of the First Draft of the NFPA Standard, First Revisions, Public Input, Committee Input, Committee Statements, and Ballot Results and Statements. Where applicable, the First Draft Report also contains First Correlating Revisions, Correlating Notes, and Correlating Input. The second stage of the standards development process is known as the Comments stage (also referred to as the Public Comment period). During the Public Comment period, both customers and manufacturers alike are able to propose changes to the First Draft Report that the responsible NFPA Technical Committee will consider when developing the NFPA 1981 and NFPA 1982, 2018 edition standards. The First Draft Reports should be used as background in the submission of public comments. Scott Safety strongly encourages you to get familiar with the proposed changes to the standards and to voice your opinion. As part of the first responder community, now is the time to provide your input to the NFPA to help shape the future direction of the standards. Public comments may be submitted online up until the closing date of November 17, NFPA 1981 Public Comment Period NFPA 1982 Public Comment Period Once the Public Comment closing date has passed, all submitted Public Comments will be forwarded to the responsible Technical Committee to be addressed at a Second Draft meeting, where the committee reviews all Public Comments and develops the Second Draft of the new standard. The Second Draft meeting for NFPA 1981 will take place the week of January 14, The Second Draft meeting for NFPA 1982 will take place the week of December 10, NOTE: All Technical Committee meetings are open to the public. For more information on committee activities and other information related to a particular standard, please visit the Doc info pages at and select the appropriate standard from the List of NFPA Codes and Standards. As the Second Draft Report is posted and we begin to move closer to the issuance date for the final 2018 edition of the NFPA 1981 and NFPA 1982 standards, we will keep you informed as a valued customer. Thank you for your continued support and confidence in Scott Safety s respiratory protection products. Should you have further questions, please feel free to contact your local Scott Regional Sales Manager or Field Service Specialist. Sincerely, Jason Cannon Product Line Manager, Air-Pak SCBA Scott Safety

17 2017 Incident by Types 14% 4% 18% 1% 11% 10% 34% 8% Fire Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat (No Fire) EMS Rescue Hazardous Condition (No Fire) Service Good Intent False Alarm Other

18 Project Title: Houston - Construction of Cheri Lake Drive Improvements TPS Number: Priority: 2 Agency: Grant Recipient: Houston Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities (AS ) FY2019 State Funding Request: $946,542 One-Time Need Brief Project Description: The project is to reconstruct Cheri Lake Drive from the Parks Highway to Karen Avenue located in Houston, Alaska. The reconstruction will provide much needed safety improvements on the heavily used school bus route within the community. Public safety is greatly inhibited by the existing road conditions, due the narrow width and dangerous curves. This project is construction ready. Funding Plan: Total Project Cost: $1,424,529 Funding Already Secured: ($477,987) FY2019 State Funding Request: ($946,542) Project Deficit: $0 Explanation of Other Funds: Additional funding is needed to facilitate the construction of the roadway improvements. As part of the design process an Engineers Estimate was developed to determine total estimated project costs. Detailed Project Description and Justification: This Project Will Provide: The project will rectify immediate public safety hazards on Cheri Lake Drive. The project will; increase road widths, provide horizontal and vertical realignments, upgrade existing intersections, improve roadside drainage, install safety signage, and provide pedestrian safety enhancements primarily for school children. Completion of the planned upgrades will bring the road into compliance with current Matanuska-Susitna Borough (MSB) and Alaska Department of Transportation (ADOT) standards for roadways. Justification: Submitted to Legislature The Houston area is growing at an unprecedented speed. The infrastructure within the City needs to address the growth as well as the safety of its children and their families. Cheri Lake Drive currently serves a high volume of residential and recreational uses and will not adequately provide for projected traffic volumes. Cheri Lakes Drive also provides the primary direction of traffic for commercial delivery vehicles headed to addresses off of King Arthur Road, the most heavily traveled road in Houston. Due to the narrow road width school busses often need to slow or come to a complete stop when passing other vehicles on the road during dry pavement conditions. The problems are magnified when the roads are icy. Sometimes a school bus must back up to the nearest intersection to allow for the safe passage of oncoming vehicles and ensure the safety of the students on board. The roadway is eighteen (18') feet wide with sharp corners creating poor line of sight for drivers. There are no shoulders wide enough for a car pull over or other drivers to go around safely in the case of a break down. The road does not meet current MSB or ADOT standards for a road of its type or use. This project is shovel ready with full plans, specifications, and permits. Currently there are 14 buses that route through the Cheri Lake Drive road system which transport approximately 150 students per day each way. The students being transported are Elementary, Middle School, Alternative, High School, Afterschool Activities and Special Education Programs. Bus sizes range from the largest seen in Alaska to smaller private carriers. Project Timeline: The project surveys and engineering are complete making this project shovel ready. Construction could begin as early as June 1, 2018 and can be completed in one season. 11:38 AM 2/12/2018

19 Entity Responsible for the Ongoing Operation and Maintenance of this Project: City of Houston Grant Recipient Contact Information: Name: Virgie Thompson Address: PO Box Houston, AK Phone Number: (907) This project has been through a public review process at the local level and it is a community priority. 11:38 AM 2/12/2018

20 Cheri Lake Drive Improvements Houston, Alaska Uncontrolled intersection at Ray St. Project Description: Narrow road section with blind corner The project is to reconstruct Cheri Lake Drive from the Parks Highway to Karen Avenue located in Houston, Alaska. The reconstruction will provide much needed safety improvements on the heavily used school bus route within the community. Public safety is greatly inhibited by the existing road conditions, due the narrow road and dangerous curves. This project is construction ready, surveys and engineering are complete. The project will rectify immediate public safety hazards on Cheri Lake Drive. The project will; increase road widths, provide horizontal and vertical realignments, upgrade existing intersections, improve roadside drainage, install safety signage, and provide pedestrian safety enhancements primarily for school children. Completion of the planned upgrades will bring the road into compliance with current Matanuska-Susitna Borough (MSB) and Alaska Department of Transportation (ADOT) standards for roadways. Project Justification: The Houston area is growing at an unprecedented rate. The infrastructure within the City needs to address the growth as well as the safety of its children and their families. Cheri Lake Drive currently serves a high volume of residential and recreational traffic and will not adequately provide for projected traffic volumes. Cheri Lakes Drive also provides the primary direction of traffic for commercial delivery vehicles headed to addresses off of King Arthur Road, the most heavily traveled road in Houston. Due to the narrow road width school busses often need to slow or come to a complete stop when passing other vehicles on the road during dry pavement conditions. The problems are magnified when the roads are icy. Sometimes a school bus must back up to the nearest intersection to allow for the safe passage of oncoming vehicles and ensure the safety of the students on board. The roadway is eighteen (18 ) feet wide with sharp corners creating poor line of sight for drivers. There are no shoulders wide enough for a car pull over or other drivers to go around safely in the case of a break down. The road does not meet current MSB or ADOT standards for a road of its type or use. This project is shovel ready with full plans, specifications, and permits. Currently there are 14 buses that route through the Cheri Lake Drive road system which transport approximately 150 students per day each way. The students being transported are Elementary, Middle School, Alternative, High School, Afterschool Activities and Special Education Programs. Bus sizes range from the largest seen in Alaska to smaller private carriers. 1 of 2

21 Safety Issues: The following issues are major safety concerns along Cheri Lake Drive: Narrow roadway with no defined shoulders does not allow safe passing of oncoming traffic. Poor lines of sight obstructing driver s ability to see oncoming buses and vehicles. Intersections along the road corridor are not properly constructed or controlled creating safety hazards to vehicles and pedestrians. Failing road structural section is creating asphalt cracking, rutting, and potholes. Poor drainage and inadequate drainage systems. Lack of signage. Project Status: The project surveys and engineering are complete making this project shovel ready. Construction could begin as early as June 1, 2018 and can be completed in one season. 2 of 2

22 City of Houston, Alaska Fire Department January 31, 2018 Mayor Thompson: This letter is to share a concern for your regarding public safety and operational response of Houston Fire Department regarding a specific area of Houston that is a grave concern for me. Cheri Lake Road has a history of vehicle accidents that is statistically higher than any other city road, and for a collector road has a higher propensity of injuries and damage done not just to the vehicle and occupants but the community as a whole. At its intersection with N. Ray St., Cheri Lake Dr. has extremely limited visibility, which creates a higher risk of harm because N. Ray St. is an access road to our Loon Lake Fill Site that is needed to sustain the flow required to maintain our ISO classification. At its intersection with Loon St., traffic turning from Loon St. onto Cheri Lake Dr. have nearly no visibility of the southbound traffic until they have committed into the road. This has been an issue several times for fire apparatus as they attempt to turn left and instead have to make a three-point turn in the middle of Cheri Lake Dr. At its intersection with White Rabbit Cir., Cheri Lake has a sharp eastward turn when coming from the south that leads at least two vehicles annually into a power pole on the south side of the intersection. Poles at this location often show multiple indications of impact and damage and are replaced more frequently due to wear and tear or vehicle separation than any other pole in the city. The Houston Fire Department strongly recommends that the city seek funding or cooperative opportunities to fix this road for the safety not just of commuting traffic but also to improve the safety and effectiveness of emergency response using that road. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Respectfully Submitted, Christian M Hartley, Fire Chief City of Houston Fire Department P.O. Box Houston, Alaska Station 9-1 Phone (907) Station 9-2 Phone: (907) Fax: (907) Website: