Section 2 Study Area

Similar documents
SECTION 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

LAND USE CATEGORIES. City of Sparks Comprehensive Plan Chapter Two: Pathway to the Future - Draft 1

LAND USE CATEGORIES. City of Sparks Comprehensive Plan Land Use Categories - Draft

City of Orange Trails at Santiago Creek Specific Plan Recirculated Draft EIR Appendix C: Notice of Preparation (NOP) and Comment Letters

SECTION IV: DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

Land Use and Community Design Element

To ensure that resources will be available to provide a consistent level of public services to the community.

3.0 Project Description

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

4.0 INTRODUCTION TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED

LAND USE MODEL UPDATE. Planning and Land Use Advisory Committee Meeting #2 September 4, 2014

II. SUMMARY WEBB A. PROJECT SUMMARY 1. PROJECT LOCATION

CITY OF MANTECA GENERAL PLAN 2023

1 INTRODUCTION. A. Purpose of this General Plan

REGION-WIDE BUILDOUT IMPACT ANALYSIS

7,600 Residential Units 1,700,000 SF Non-Res 300-Room ALF 300-Room Hotel University School, Park, Civic parcels 1,889 ac flow-way/preservation

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5.9 LAND USE Existing Conditions Historic Land Use Trends Existing Land Use Distribution

PRIOR TO MONDAY APRIL 23

Land Use LAND USE. Major Findings. Town of Windsor General Plan Update

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Inter-Departmental Correspondence

2.0 Hi s t o r y & Existing Co n d i t i o n s

AVANTI SOUTH. SPECIFIC PLAN June Prepared for: Applicant: Royal Investors Group, LLC

Subject: Source Evaluation Task 2.3 Dry Weather Flows from MS4 Outfalls (2011 Dry Season)

NEWBRIDGE SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION SEPTEMBER 24, 2012

3. LAND USE INTRODUCTION VISION

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

APPENDIX C SPECIAL PLANNING AREAS

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

Jackson Highway Master Plans

34TH ST N. Pond MUSA VILLAGE. post-2040 existing. Armstrong Goose 10TH ST N RAD. post-2040 RSF LDR MDR RSFS V-HDR HDR V-MU MU-BP

POCKET COMMUNITY PLAN

LAND USE TANGLEWILDE/THOMPSON PLACE PLANNING AREA. C. Identified Neighborhood Groups and Homeowner s Associations

SUNSET CORRIDOR LAND. The property is now available and ready for corporate utilization, development or investment.

Chapter 2: Land Use Element

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

Edmond Plan IV Update 2016, Descriptions and Recommendations for future Land Use for the Far Northeast Neighborhoods.

THE PLANNING AREA 2.1 PLANNING AREA LOCATION

Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

A. OVERVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

4. Environmental Setting

2 PLANNING AREA DESCRIPTION

III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Staff Report and Recommendation

GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

DRAFT Land Use Chapter

Elm Fork Land Use. Trinity River Corridor Project Committee May 13, 2013

S o u t h C e n t r a l O u t l i n e P l a n. Leduc Business Park. North Leduc Industrial Area Structure Plan C it y of Led u c.

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

4.8 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Appendix D. Task 4: Land Use and Transportation Alternatives. Team Meeting Summary -November 16, Team Workshop Summary- December 20, 2011

N EWMAN 2030 GENERAL P LAN

GENERAL LAND USE POLICIES

LAND USE AND CIRCULATION: LAND USE ELEMENT

AGENDA ITEM TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER. Item Number: Submitted By: Douglas D. Dumhart, Community Development Director

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Pine Island Road Corridor Master Plan

Chapter 3: A Balanced Land Use Pattern

DRAFT ETC Master Plan. Appendix D Land Uses and Demographics

New Auburn Village Center Study Auburn, Maine

Land Use Element. City of San Clemente Centennial General Plan, February 2014

open public hearing and allow public comment request to continue LPA public hearing to January 16, 2014 at 10:30 am

PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.

EAST SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY PLAN

This page intentionally left blank.

1. INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY PLAN OVERVIEW PURPOSE. A Community Plan serves as. a blueprint for future growth. and development within a

Chapter 7: Land Use Plan

OCEANSIDE DEVELOPER S CONFERENCE

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee


1. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Goals, Objectives, and Policies

01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Lee Lake Community: Mixed-Use Area (MUA) Highest Density Residential (HHDR) Neighborhoods

Urban Development Areas Bedford County

Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff Report CPAS-09(07) Harvey Little/Arevee Road FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM RES-9 TO COM

5. Environmental Analysis

4 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS

4.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING EXISTING CONDITIONS REGULATORY BACKGROUND LAND USES IN THE PLAN AREA SURROUNDING LAND USES

Today s Topics. 1. Master Plan Conformance discussion. 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guide Review discussion

BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study

Rapid City Planning Commission Comprehensive Plan Amendment Project Report

17.11 Establishment of Land Use Districts

M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 2018

Southeast Quadrant Plan

CITY OFLOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

Colerain Township report to. Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission. December 2, 2010, 1:00PM. t a f f r e p o r t

Land Use element LAND USE POLICY AREAS ESTATE AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL AREAS/RURAL SHELDON AREA OLD TOWN ELK GROVE

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING

Appendix I-A3 DENAIR COMMUNITY PLAN

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

Mariposa Lakes. Planned Community. Project Overview. Stockton, CA

Visual Assessment of Scenic Design (SD) Combining Zone Removal and SLU Additions Along Scenic Highway 12 Part Two

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Providing a mix of housing options supporting a diversity of needs (800-1,600 sf 1-3 bd flats and Townhomes).

Today Land & People. Northeast Nampa Gateway District. Employment. Land Use Characteristics. Demographics. Current Zoning

Transcription:

Study Area Section 2 Study Area 2-1 Purpose This section describes the study area of the Update and discusses the existing and future land uses within the study area. 2-2 Location The study area, as shown in Figure 2-1, is coincident with the City boundary, with exception to two areas of the City serviced by Cucamonga Valley Water District which are located in the northeast corner of Interstate 15 and Interstate 10 and the area north of 4 th Street and East of Vineyard. The City is divided into two main areas, the Old Model Colony (OMC) in the north and the New Model Colony (NMC) in the south with Riverside Avenue being the general divider between the two, with exception to a portion of the OMC the lays south of Riverside Avenue between Archibald Ave and the Edison Power Lines to Schaffer Avenue. OMC consists of existing residential, commercial, and industrial developments. It comprises approximately 37.3 square miles. NMC is an agricultural area that was annexed in 1999. It currently consists of approximately 12.8 square miles of agricultural land. The City s General Plan 2010 details plans to develop the agricultural lands in NMC into a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, and public uses. The ultimate residential population of NMC is expected to reach 151,932. The topography of the region generally slopes in a southwesterly direction from 1170 to 630 feet above mean sea level (amsl). 2-3 Existing Land Use The existing land use types of the City are shown using general categories on Figure 2-2. The OMC is primarily built out, while the NMC is primarily comprised of agricultural land and rural residential land within by agricultural land parcels. The City s GIS and parcel land data was used to determine existing land use information. C:\Work\RWMP\FinalReport\Docs\Section2StudyArea.doc Page 2-1 Final Report October 2011

La Verne Thompson Thompson Creek Creek Griffith Park Cable Deer Creek Creek Day Creek Claremont Upland Rancho Cucamonga io Wash San An ttoni Montclair Cucamonga C rreek Ontario Intl Pomona Ontario Fontana Glen Avon Sunny Chino Ch iino C rreek California Istitution For Men Chino Mira Loma Pedley Rub Chino Hills October 2011 Santa Ana River Reg Park Page 2-2 Figure 2-1: Study Area Riverside Muni Chino Hills State Park Prado Reg Park Norco Riverside

Admin./Prof. Ag. Multi-Use Commercial Group Quarters HDR Industrial LDR LMDR MDR Manufacturing Misc. Service Org. Mobile Home Office Other Other Residential Parks/Rec/Cultural Public Facilities ROW School Street/Parking Transp/Utilities Vacant Vacant Bldg Warehousing October 2011 Page 2-3 Figure 2-2: Exisiting Landuses

Study Area 2-4 Ultimate Land Use The ultimate land uses are based upon the City s latest general plan document entitled The Ontario Plan (2010). Table 2-2 provides a summary of the ultimate land uses and Figure 2-3 shows the locations of these land uses. From the previous General Plan to the current Ontario Plan, the residential area increases to 10,915 acres (34.2 percent of total) and the employment area, including business parks and industrial uses, is expected to entail about 8,103 acres (25.4 percent of total). Residential Land Uses The Ontario Plan defines five residential land use categories: Rural, Low Density, Low- Medium Density, Medium Density, and High Density. The plan assumes densities for each of the residential land use categories and are shown in Table 2-1. Retail / Service Four retail / service uses are defined: Neighborhood Commercial, General Commercial, Office Commercial, and Hospitality. The assumed intensities for each commercial use are shown in Table 2-1. Employment Two employment uses are defined: Business Park and Industrial. The assumed intensities for each commercial use are shown in Table 2-1. Open Space Open Space land use designations include Non-Recreational Open Space, Recreational Open Space and Water Open Space (i.e. lakes, ponds, etc). Public Public land use designations include Public Facility and Public School. Other Other land use designations include the Ontario International Airport, Landfill, Railroad and Roadways. C:\Work\RWMP\FinalReport\Docs\Section2StudyArea.doc Page 2-4 Final Report October 2011

Study Area Table 3-1: The Ontario Plan Approved Land Use Buildout Estimates (Citywide)1 Land Use Category Acres 2 Density (du/ac) 3 Intensity (FAR) 3 Units Population 4 Square Feet (Non-Office) Square Feet (Office) Jobs 5 (Non-Office) Jobs 5 (Office) Total Jobs 5 Total Square Feet Residential Rural Residential - RR 453 2.0 906 3,621 Low Density Residential - LDR (OMC) 4,308 4.0 17,232 68,876 Low Density Residential - LDR (NMC) 3,158 4.5 14,211 56,801 Low-Medium Density Residential - LMDR (OMC) 295 8.5 2,508 10,026 Low-Medium Density Residential - LMDR (NMC) 505 8.5 4,295 17,167 Medium Density Residential - MDR (OMC) 896 18.0 16,124 61,551 Medium Density Residential - MDR (NMC) 1,059 22.0 23,294 77,964 High Density Residential - HDR 241 35.0 8,421 28,185 Subtotal 10,915 86,991 324,192 Mixed Use (MU) Downtown 109 35.0 2,279 4,557 756,202 756,202 1,512,403 543 2,163 2,706 Euclid & Francis 10 30.0 156 312 181,210 0 181,210 419 0 419 Holt 55 30.0 412 824 478,289 1,195,722 1,674,011 343 3,420 3,763 Meredith 246 40.0 2,957 5,914 2,146,637 5,366,592 7,513,229 1,541 15,348 16,890 Hospitality 76 60.0 457 914 1,493,672 1,493,672 2,987,345 1,072 4,272 5,344 Ontario Festival (MxU in 14) 37 20.0 368 736 112,211 240,451 352,662 81 688 768 Guasti 83 30.0 500 1,001 1,089,871 1,271,516 2,361,388 783 3,637 4,419 Ontario Center (E. of Haven) 345 40.0 4,139 8,278 1,502,384 7,511,922 9,014,306 1,079 21,484 22,563 Mills 240 40.0 479 958 3,912,233 1,564,893 5,477,126 2,809 4,476 7,285 NMC south 316 35.0 3,315 6,630 962,632 5,775,795 6,738,427 691 16,519 17,210 NMC east 264 25.0 1,978 3,956 1,378,413 1,206,111 2,584,524 990 3,449 4,439 SR60 & Hamner 41 0.0 0 0 349,112 313,305 662,417 251 896 1,147 Subtotal 1,822 17,039 34,078 14,362,865 26,696,182 41,059,046 10,601 76,351 86,952 Retail/Service Neighborhood Commercial - NC 277 0.30 2,896,914 724,229 3,621,143 6,692 2,071 8,763 General Commercial - GC 552 0.30 6,488,654 720,962 7,209,616 4,659 2,062 6,721 Office/Commercial - OC 526 0.75 5,151,406 12,019,946 17,171,352 3,699 34,377 38,076 Hospitality - HOS 145 1.00 5,049,475 1,262,369 6,311,844 3,626 3,610 7,236 Subtotal 1,499 19,586,449 14,727,505 34,313,954 18,675 42,121 60,796 Employment Business Park - BP 1,357 0.40 11,821,313 11,821,313 23,642,626 7,684 33,809 41,493 Industrial - IND 6,747 0.55 145,469,382 16,163,265 161,632,647 94,555 46,227 140,782 Subtotal 8,103 157,290,695 27,984,578 185,275,273 102,239 80,036 182,275 Other Open Space-Non-Recreation - OS-NR 1,243 Open Space-Parkland - OS-R 991 Open SpaceWater - OS-W 59 Public Facility - PF 99 Public School - PS 627 Airport - ARPT 1,422 Landfill - Rail 247 Railroad - LF 137 Right-Of-Way - ROW 4,794 Subtotal 9,619 Total 31,958 104,030 358,270 191,240,009 69,408,264 260,648,273 131,515 198,508 330,023 Notes 1 Historically, citywide buildout levels do not achieve the maximum allowable density/intensity on every parcel and are, on average, lower than allowed by the General Plan. Accordingly, the buildout estimates in this General Plan do not assume buildout at the maximum density or intensity and instead are adjusted downward to account for variations in buildout intensity. Buildout assumptions are as agreed upon on 2-4-08. 2 Acres are given as adjusted gross acreages, which do not include the right-of-way for roadways, flood control facilities, or railroads. 3 Density/Intensity includes both residential density, expressed as units per acre, and non-residential intensity, expressed as floor area ratio (FAR), which is the amount of building square feet in relation to the size of the lot. 4 Estimates of population by residential designation are based on a persons-per-household factor that varies by housing type. 3.347 pph for MF, 3.278 pph for sfa, and 3.997 pph for sfd. 5 The factors used to generate the number of employees are 2.310 e/1000 sf of community commercial;.718 e/1000 sf of regional commercial;.650 e/1000 sf of industrial; and 2.86 e/1000 sf of office. C:\Work\RWMP\FinalReport\Docs\Section2StudyArea.doc Page 2-5 Final Report - October 2011

Ultimate Landuse Airport Business Park General Commercial High Density Residential Hospitality Industrial Low Density Residential Land Fill Low-Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Commercial Office Commercial Open Space - Non-Recreational Open Space - Recreational Open Space - Water Public Facility Public School Rural Residential Rail October 2011 Page 2-6 Figure 2-3: Ultimate Land Use