Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth

Similar documents
Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

CITY OF TIGARD EXPECTED SERVICE AREA

Joint Study Session of the Sutter County. March 2, 2009

New Partners for Smart Growth Conference February 5, 2010

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

Metro. Activity Center Design Guidelines. Recommendations For Developing Focused, Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Centers

K. SMART ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Location. Need GOAL 14 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY. Urban Planning in Oregon 7/8/2015

General Location Annex, Rezone & Preliminary Plat Lansdowne Addition, Unit Three

CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation

BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION

CHARLES PUTMAN CHARLES PUTMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC

Review of Opportunity Area C Draft Comprehensive Plan and Draft BOS Follow-On Motions. Special Working Group Meeting March 4, 2015

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN 7

West Bull Mountain Concept Plan REPORT OCTOBER (

LAND USE MEADOWS PLANNING AREA

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

C. Westerly Creek Village & The Montview Corridor

Keyport. Vision for Keyport

Dwelling Units Max 12 dwelling units per acre/min 8 dwelling units per acre. Development Mix 80% non residential/20% residential

EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Description of Preferred Alternative

Complete Neighbourhood Guidelines Review Tool

SECTION IV: DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT

Neighborhood Districts

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

Further input invited as Colchester Growth Strategy nears final phase

Broadway District Specific Plan. Community Workshop #2 February 23,2016

Today s Topics. 1. Master Plan Conformance discussion. 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Guide Review discussion

This Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Elderberry, Pioneer, Junction

Mariposa Lakes. Planned Community. Project Overview. Stockton, CA

include playgrounds, sports fields, community gardens and picnic areas.

Ivywild On The Creek PRELIMINARY CREEK DISTRICT MASTER PLAN

Osceola County Board of County Commissioners 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1100 Kissimmee, FL

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Staff Report and Recommendation

GATEWAY AREA STRUCTURE PLAN

Seneca Meadows. Block 4 Locate office, technology, and medical development adjacent to I Screen views of garage structures from I-270.

SYRINGA VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN NARRATIVE

City of Heath. Town Center Concept

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS

WELCOME and introduction

SECTION TWO: Urban Design Concepts

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

The Floyds Fork Area Plan

CITY OF COLWICH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE LAND USE 1

Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017

VICTORIA DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

SHEFFIELD PARK Paulding County, GA DRI #588

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

City of Villages Parking Strategies. William Anderson, FAICP City Planning & Community Investment San Diego Parking Symposium July 14, 2006

Midtown Greenway Land Use and Development Plan Executive Summary

9 th Street Sub Area Plan

CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.

Selected Area Study. Vision Plan Draft

3. VISION AND GOALS. Vision Statement. Goals, Objectives and Policies

Michigan City Alternative Analysis Realignment Study. Progress Status Update Report Presentation to City Council February 1, 2012

2.7 ac park. TOTAL 5,403 DU 1,297,900 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac 5,563 DU 1,121,200 sf 1,105,450 sf 3.87 ac

Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018

Town Center. Block 5 Existing multifamily residential units are expected to remain.

City of Redmond. Urban Holding Area Master Planning Requirements and Approval Process

PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSESSION AGENDA. City Hall Second Floor Conference Room 9027 Center Street. July 1, :30 PM

Natomas Vision Plan and PLNP

Rio/29 Small Area Plan. Design Plan & Implementation Framework Open House - January 25, 2018

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 4: LAND USE

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

4 C OMMUNITY D ISTRICTS

Vision & Land Use. Discussion. Historic Preservation Plan. Foggy Bottom Campus Plan:

A. Selma Park, Davis Bay and Wilson Creek

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Subregion 4 Central Avenue-Metro Blue Line Corridor Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Implementation Project. Community Meeting April 27, 2011

Prosperity Hucks Area Plan. Transportation and Planning Committee May 11, 2015

Regional Context Statement

COMMISSION ACTION FORM

Access to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, UNC Hospitals, and Chapel Hill Transit.

Subarea 4 Indian Creek. Vision The combination of park networks and transportation amenities make Subarea 4 the greenest hub in the Corridor.

The following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:

Community Design Guidelines. Port Wallace DRAFT

Status Report: MD 355 Project

CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

E. RURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK MODEL

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Sahuarita District & Phase 1 Master Plan. Town Council December 11, 2017

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

A citizen s guide to the. Comprehensive Plan. City of Lakeville, Minnesota 1

New Auburn Village Center Study Auburn, Maine

8 Future Land Use Plan

The Floyds Fork Area Study A Framework for Growth

2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA

Bourne Downtown Site Planning

Municipal Development Plan Update Urban Service Area and Hamlets

Appendix D. Task 4: Land Use and Transportation Alternatives. Team Meeting Summary -November 16, Team Workshop Summary- December 20, 2011

5 Land Use Element49

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

SOUTH NATOMAS COMMUNITY PLAN

Transcription:

Westbound: A One-day Exploration of Growth Frog Pond Area 2018 UGB Expansion Proposal June 13, 2018 Growing Out: UGB Asks Four cities submitted proposals to expand greater Portland s urban footprint by 2,181 acres with hopes for developing about 9,200 homes in these areas. All expansion proposals are in urban reserves. Source: Metro City Gross acres Beaverton 1,242 Hillsboro 150 King City 528 Wilsonville 271 Source: Metro Growing Out: UGB Asks Wilsonville Frog Pond Area Beaverton Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve King City Beef Bend South Hillsboro Witch Hazel Village South Frog Pond Area Plan 2015 Three Neighborhoods About 500 acres 280 acres in Urban Reserve Established broad land uses, transportation, infrastructure, open space frameworks 1

Expansion Area Request Frog Pond Area Land Use Metrics Land Use Framework Transportation Framework Frog Pond East and South Neighborhoods Bicycle and Pedestrian Framework 2

Funding Summary Master Plan Projects Project Estimated Proposed Funding Who Builds Total Cost* Sources Boeckman Road Supplemental fees with sanitary $ 4,438,000 City SDCs sewer Stafford Road with Supplemental fees water and sanitary 3,164,000 City SDCs sewer Neighborhood Park 2,407,000 City Supplemental fees Trailhead Park 1,143,000 City/Developers SDCs Boeckman Trail 850,000 City/Developers SDCs $ 12,002,000 * All costs are planning level estimates and assume public sector construction South side North side Notes / Amounts $ 2.02 million $ 2.42 million West side only, east side pending UGB expansion Land $ 980,000 Improvements $1,427,000 Land $ 588,000 Improvements $ 555,000 Overview Right place Right time Will result in new development North Cooper Mountain (inside UGB) Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve South Cooper Mountain (inside UGB and City of Beaverton) 13 Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Application Why here? Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Proposal Desirable location Housing demand/need City of Beaverton Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Proposal Context Why here? Three areas work better together Beavert on Cooper Mountain Urban Reserve Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Proposal Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Proposal 3

Why now? Future housing need SCM likely built out in five years Next opportunity is six years away Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Proposal Urban Growth Boundary Expansion Proposal City of Beaverton A community that welcomes a diverse mix of neighbors with multiple types of housing choices including apartments, townhomes and single family homes. There are opportunities for community interaction via parks, pathways and open space. 4

A community that provides residents and visitors with full multi modal access. A community that seamlessly connects neighborhoods and easily transitions from urban to rural lands. A community that integrates open spaces with neighborhoods. A sustainable community that incorporates state of the art green development practices. Preservation and improvement of existing natural resources and wildlife corridors to create a truly distinct natural environment. 5

King City Snapshot 528 ac. / 318 ac. developable 3,500± units proposed 12+ du / ac. average density King City Evolution Among the fastest growing cities in the region 2000 Census 1,949 2010 Census 3,111 60% increase 2016 Census estimate 3,817 23% increase Average Annual Growth Rate 4.3% 2018 Registered voters 3,660 Natural Resources Tualatin R. floodplain Associated upland wildlife habitat Riparian corridors Shaped plan concepts King City Evolution Growth-related Change Virtually no developable land 2018 Housing Needs Analysis land availability: 2.3 ac. Commercial 1.5 ac. Residential Can accommodate only 4% of forecast demand Deficit of 980 units Redevelopment potential is limited Built since mid-60s Small lots Vacancy rates well below region & state Land Use - 4 Neighborhoods Main Street / Town Center Beef Bend Neighborhood Central Neighborhood Rural Character Neighborhood - Existing 1

Main Street / Town Center Mixed-use & highest density 3 or more stories Single story retail & restaurant Civic uses library, city hall or school Campus-style employment or institutional uses Pedestrian-friendly / transit ready Rural Character Neighborhood Lower density character Allow redevelopment to occur organically Minimize paved areas Shared streets Lower volume traffic Natural areas on the edge and within neighborhoods Beef Bend Neighborhood Attached / detached residences Potential neighborhood commercial Connected neighborhoods Beef Bend as green boulevard with multiuse path Parks & natural areas Dwelling Unit Type Multifamily Single Family Attached Development Summary Main Street / Central Beef Bend Town Center Neighborhood Low Mod Totals 1000 222 0 0 1222 500 0 60 0 560 Single Family Detached 620 444 498 232 1794 Totals 2120 666 558 232 3576 Central Neighborhood Residential character Primarily attached / detached single family Connected neighborhoods Parks & natural areas Natural areas on the edge Mobility Internal connectivity Multi-modal circulation Connected with trails & natural areas Encourage active transportation Limit reliance on nearby arterial streets 2

Infrastructure Expenses Parks and Open Space Interconnected system Neighborhood-oriented Connected with trails & natural areas Potential joint location with school Infrastructure Readiness Infrastructure Framework Costs Capacity available for water, sewer and stormwater Financing 4 Funding Categories: Local developer Sub-district multiple developers District shared infrastructure cost for all development in URA Major Off-site shared infrastructure cost for URA & surrounding areas King City North Bethany Fee URA 6D Expansion Area $8,458 $20,009 Transportation SDC Parks SDC - $11,433 Sewer $5,500 $5,300 Storm SDC - $510 Water Quality Fee (CWS) $292 Supplemental Fee (URA 6D) Transportation $11,539 Major Sanitary Sewer $481 Water $2,001 Parks $5,635 Subtotal $19,655 $0 Total $33,905 $37,252 InfrastructureFinance Estimated Housing Units Residential Allocated Supplemental Cost Fee/Unit % # Single Family Dwelling 70% 2,135 $41,964,324 $19,982 Apartment 18% 549 $6,908,527 $12,584 Residential Condominium 6% 183 $2,090,207 $11,422 Assisted Living/Hospital/Nursing Home 6% 183 $1,100,176 $6,012 Total 100% 3,050 $52,063,234 Commercial SF Allocated Supplemental Cost Fee/1,000 SF 75,000 $3,632,755 $48,437 3

Questions 4