Retail Signage Options. Planning Commission Special Meeting February 19, 2015

Similar documents
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

general corridor design guidelines gen-0.0

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

CHAPTER 5 Public Realm Improvements

Community Design Plan

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #3

V. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1

TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

Carlsbad Village Redevelopment Concept Summary of Features

VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT

I Street, Sacramento, CA

A. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

Building & Site Design Standards Application

DRAFT. 10% Common Open Space

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in North York Community Council Report 8, which was considered by City Council on October 26, 27 and 28, 2004.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

CHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Urban Design 9Identity

Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item

City Council Special Meeting AGENDA ITEM NO. C.

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

appendix and street interface guidelines

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 15, 2012

4.500 Preston Road Overlay District

Table L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on September 11, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

ARLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN CHAIR GUIDE

MIDTOWN MIXED-USE VILLAGE. TECHNICAL DATA SHEET COMPONENT C-1 FOR PUBLIC HEARING - PETITION NUMBER Project No RZ1.1. Issued.

Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements

Chapter PEDESTRIAN COMMERCIAL (PC) ZONING DISTRICT

CITY OF CALABASAS FINAL ENGINEER S REPORT. LANDSCAPE LIGHTING ACT DISTRICTS NOS. 22, 24, 27 & 32 (1972 Act Districts) FISCAL YEAR

CHAPTER 11 DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR SIGNS. Also consult Chapters and of the Truckee Municipal Code.

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

City of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

City of La Palma Agenda Item No. 5

Arlington County Retail Plan

Site Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

CENTERS AND CORRIDORS

Corridor Beautification Partnership

OCEANFRONT RESORT DISTRICT FORM-BASED CODE. Sign Regulations (as amended Dec. 5, 2018)

Othello Neighborhood Design Guidelines

Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board

CHEBOYGAN COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

Public input has been an important part of the plan development process.

section five BEAUTIFICATION PLAN

CHAPTER SPECIAL PURPOSE AND OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICTS

The Ritz-Carlton, Paradise Valley

SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation

Village of Glenview Appearance Commission

Sign Regulations. for Urban Regional Shopping Centers. County Board Meeting November 5, CPHD, Planning Division

Chapter 15. Public Art Guidelines 15.2 GENERAL DESIGN OBJECTIVES 15.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 15.3 PUBLIC ART GUIDELINES

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.3 STAFF REPORT August 18, 2015 Staff Contact: Peyman Behvand (707)

Parcel 5. Level 1 Application March 12, Design Submittal POST ROAD RESIDENTIAL

Access Management: An Overview

Future Five. Design/ Development Guidelines. January 2008 Amended June 08 per City Council motion

Workshop 3. City of Burlington Waterfront Hotel Planning Study. September 14, The Planning Partnership

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT

COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT FEBRUARY 1, Maureen Tamuri, Community Development Director, AICP Michael Klein, Senior Planner

South fields. Community Architectural Design Guidelines. The Planning Partnership

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

lot flankage Y street 16m 6m landscape strip for large site 3m landscape strip for small medium site

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT TO THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR REVIEW BOARD (ERB)

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

The transportation system in a community is an

BUSINESS DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

6 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: CAH HOLDINGS, LLC

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Corridor Identity. Section 9. Introduction. Corridor Guiding Principles

Location and Field Inspection: History: Master Plan Recommendation:

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

Chapter 4: Jordan Road Character District

ARTICLE RRCO RED ROCK CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT

Architectural Review Board Report

Gateway commercial MIXED USE MASTER SITE PLAN. CITILAND AIrDRIE GATEWAY VENTURE INC. airdrie GATEWAY COMMERCE CENTRE. airdrie, ALBERTA FEBRUARY 2012

LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND APPENDICES

Planning Board Briefing

Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Scope of Services. River Oaks Boulevard (SH 183) Corridor Master Plan

SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines

DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS MEDICAL DISTRICT

Request for Decision. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Jul 07, Report Date Friday, Jun 20, Type: Public Hearings

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES

The subject site plan amendment proposes the following revisions to the approved site plan:

Transcription:

Retail Signage Options Planning Commission Special Meeting February 19, 2015 1

Agenda Todays PC Workshop Structure: 1) Review of current shopping center locations 2) General Plan and Code Review 3) Provide options for your consideration 4) Public Comment 5) Commissioner Questions and Discussion 6) Commission Recommendations for Code Development 2

Why Signage? Per the Small Business Administration (SBA): Signs are the most effective, least expensive form of advertising Signs introduce businesses to potential customers People judge businesses by their signs Merchants increase their business with good signs Awareness of a business is most highly correlated with seeing the sign 3

Why Signage? From the American Planning Association (2001): Studies indicate that one additional sign increased annual sales by 5% and transactions by 4% Larger (eg. pole) signs generate far larger per dollar transactional benefits Changing a sign resulted in up to 5% sales increase Adding a pole or multi-tenant display sign increased weekly sales between 4 and 12% Retailers with high volume flow by traffic obtain better results with signage improvements 4

Code Limitations to Address Assuming no change to the Scenic Corridor, Freeway Facing and Landscaping Codes, how can the City improve: Visibility of individual businesses from the public street? Identification of individual businesses from the freeway? A shopping center s internal visibility of retail storefronts and special offerings? 5

Sign Options for PC Consideration 1) Freeway Facing Signage Individual Tenant Signage Freeway Facing Monument Sign 2) Monument Signs Introduction of Gateway Signs Monument sign size, number and placement 3) Sidewalk Signs/Internal Tenant Identification Directional Signage Pedestrian Signs Sidewalk Signs 6

Sign Options for PC Consideration 1) Freeway Facing Signage Individual Tenant Signage Freeway Facing Monument Sign 2) Monument Signs Introduction of Gateway Signs Monument sign size, number and placement 3) Sidewalk Signs/Internal Tenant Identification Directional Signage Pedestrian Signs Sidewalk Signs 7

Signage Context 8

Sign Context: 101 Freeway Signs There are 32 Caltrans freeway signs between the Lost Hills and Las Virgenes exits. 9

Sign Context: 101 Freeway LAC Development View of Canyon Center from the 101 Freeway looking southeast 10

Sign Context: 101 Freeway Utility Lines View of the Courtyard at the Commons from the 101 Freeway looking southeast 11

Calabasas Code Compliant Project View of the Summit from the 101 Freeway looking southeast 12

Freeway Facing Signage Option Freeway Facing Leave current 1 building, 1 sign as the code baseline Permit a) Individual Tenant Signs or b) a Multi- Tenant Monument Sign when a property owner agrees to: Provide building and parking lot landscaping, screening and colors meeting scenic corridor requirements Provide consistent exterior signage style/design/halo lighting 13

Freeway Monument Sign Option 14

Freeway Monument Sign Option 15

Freeway Tenant Sign Option 16

Freeway Tenant Sign Option 17

Freeway Monument Sign Option 18

Freeway Monument Sign Option 19

Sign Options for PC Consideration 1) Freeway Facing Signage Individual Tenant Signage Freeway Facing Monument Sign 2) Monument Signs Introduction of Gateway Signs Monument sign size, number and placement 3) Sidewalk Signs/Internal Tenant Identification Directional Signage Sidewalk Signs Pedestrian Signs 20

Summit Monument Sign Proposal 21

Summit Monument Sign Proposal 22

Current Signage Code 17.20.070 - Design Considerations Inclusion of gateways which create a visual sense of entry in all developments is encouraged Gateways or entry features should include enriched paving, raised medians, signage, landscaping, and other features as appropriate 23

Entrance Gateways The Commons 24

Entrance Gateways The Commons 25

Entrance Gateways The Summit 26

Entrance Gateways The Summit 27

Entrance Gateways Courtyard at the Commons 28

Entrance Gateways Courtyard at the Commons 29

Entrance Gateways Creekside Village (Albertsons) 30

Entrance Gateways Creekside Village (Albertsons) 31

Signage Consideration Add new sign category called Gateway Sign Establish size and design standards Landscape features Distance from (e) Monument Signs Allow Multiple Tenant Identification on Gateway Signs Limit placement to Driveway Entrances 32

Entrance Gateways The Summit 33

Entrance Gateways The Summit 34

MONUMENT SIGNS 35

Monument Sign Objectives Provide visibility to the general public in order to assist in locating and identifying businesses Guide vehicular and pedestrian traffic to enter shopping centers Introduce shopping center s architectural style and materials 36

Development Standards Chapter 17.30.080 Monument Signs for shopping centers: 1 per center/complex 2 per center/complex with 2 access driveways with minimum separation of 300 feet 100 sq. ft. per face (2 faces max) & sign copy limited to 50 sq. ft. 10 foot maximum height limit 20 foot maximum height limit permitted on Calabasas Road District only & up to 25 feet with Council approval pursuant to Section 17.30.080 37

Petitioners Concerns Number and size restricts tenant identification and visibility Insufficient size/illumination for freeway identification Unequitable allocation of signage between shopping centers processed under the current sign code vs. previous sign codes 38

Staff Observations 7 of 10 shopping center monument signs do not meet code requirements 5 of 10 fail to adequately identify tenants 5 of 10 do not include high quality materials and colors 5 of 10 exceed allowed sign area and height 39

Monument sign built under previous code Exceeds height limit Cabinet lighting (prohibited under current code) Exceeds maximum allowed sign area Design not consistent with Scenic Corridor (Design Guidelines and Las Virgenes Road Corridor Plan) Lack of landscaping to enhance sign 40

Monument signs built under previous code Incompatible individual designs Lack of character due to insufficient or no landscaping No central theme or architectural compatibility with shopping center s architecture Size limits proper tenant identification 1 2 3 41

Monument Sign Approved Under Current Code Maximum height does not exceed 10 ft. Sign area limited to 50 sq. ft. Two monument signs max (per driveway access) Materials and colors of high quality and architecture consistent with shopping center Design consistent with Scenic Corridor Design Guidelines 42

Monument Sign Considerations Increased Height for Visibility Increased Sign Area for Individual Tenant Identification Improved Night Lighting Required Landscape and Hardscape Setting 43

Monument Sign Considerations No maximum on monument signs per access driveway (if no Gateway Sign ) Additional monument signs or size based on parcel frontage and street exposures eg: Decrease the current required 300 ft. separation eg: Height and sign area increase with distance from public ROW 44

Sign Options for PC Consideration 1) Freeway Facing Signage Individual Tenant Signage Freeway Facing Monument Sign 2) Monument Signs Introduction of Gateway Signs Monument sign size, number and placement 3) Sidewalk Signs/Internal Tenant Identification Directional Signage Pedestrian Signs Sidewalk Signs 45

Sidewalk Signs/Tenant Identification Petitioners asked for sign boards on public ROW s to help direct shoppers to their businesses; Council did not endorse the concept 46

Directional Signage Option Existing Internal Directional Sign located within The Commons Existing Internal Directional Sign located within the Calabasas Civic Center Existing directional signage limited in height and area; sign copy limited to Entrance ; Exit ; and directional arrows Consider additional size and allow tenant identification 47

Internal Tenant Identification: Pedestrian Signage 48

Internal Tenant Identification: Pedestrian Signage 49

Internal Tenant Identification 50

Sidewalk Signs Freestanding sidewalk signs identified in the Commons Sign program, but not in the Calabasas sign code Allows promotion of special events and retail offers/promotions Violations abound but no complaints received regarding the signs 51

Internal Tenant identification 52

Summary of Signage Options Permit Freeway Facing individual tenant or monument signs shopping centers meet scenic corridor requirements Create a new Gateway Sign type Re-examine Monument Sign height, size, number design, illumination & landscaping Internal Tenant Identification Allow tenant identification to Directional Signage Increase size of Pedestrian Signs Permit Interior Sandwich Boards 53

Agenda Todays PC Workshop Structure: 1) Review of current shopping center locations 2) General Plan and Code Review 3) Provide options for your consideration 4) Public Comment 5) Commissioner Questions and Discussion 6) Commission Recommendations for Code Development 54

Summary of Signage Options Permit individual tenant signage or monument signs when freeway facing shopping centers meet scenic corridor requirements Create a new Gateway Sign type Monument signs (height, size, design, illumination & landscaping) Internal tenant Identification Directional signage Increase size of pedestrian sign Sandwich boards allowed via sign program 55

Agenda Todays PC Workshop Structure: 1) Review of current shopping center locations 2) General Plan and Code Review 3) Provide options for your consideration 4) Public Comment 5) Commissioner Questions and Discussion 6) Commission Recommendations for Code Development 56