Exposed Wood in Fire Resistive Applications

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Exposed Wood in Fire Resistive Applications"

Donald Reeves
6 years ago
Views:

This presentation was developed by a third party and

1 Please add relevant logo here Exposed Wood in Fire Resistive Applications David Barber, Arup Disclaimer: This presentation was developed by a third party and is not funded by WoodWorks or the Softwood Lumber Board.

2 Content Why wood? IBC requirements Fire fundamentals Fire testing Applications to code compliant buildings Summary USDA:

3 Why wood? Sustainability Aesthetics, innovation Changing technology Efficient construction Prefabrication A differentiator

4 Current approach CLT Glulam NLT Structural composite lumber (LVL, LSL, PSL)

5 What is a Fire Resistance Rating? Structural resistance Integrity Insulation (from CLT Handbook, US Edition )

6 What is Interior Finish Flammability? Classification for flame spread and smoke development ASTM E84 Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials ( Steiner tunnel ) From Nordic

7 Wood Construction and the NYCBC Combustible construction Type III, IV, V Non-combustible construction Type I, II Wood is combustible construction Code compliant use in Types III, IV, V

8 Wood Construction and the NYCBC Type IIIA: Up to 6 stories (B and R uses) 1 hrfrr load bearing frame 2hr FRR load bearing external walls Type IV (heavy timber): As for Type IIIA Type V: Low rise, limited area, few restrictions

9 Wood Construction and the NYCBC Types III, IV, V wood can be exposed

10 What Does a Type IV HT Building Look Like? Up to 6 floors, with sprinklers Wood beams, columns, floors, roof permitted Exterior walls are noncombustible, or FRT wood Code sets minimum dimensions for members 10 Duratherm Presentation

11 AModern Type IV Building Up to 6 floors, with sprinklers Exposed wood Use of steel or concrete, where appropriate (hybrid construction) Glulam beams, columns; CLT floors and walls 11

12 Mass timber and fire - fundamentals

14 Combustibility - Just another engineering problem? APA

15 All materials are vulnerable to fire:

16 Wood - Fire fundamentals Schaffer, 1966, Forest Products Laboratory

17 Wood -Fire fundamentals 1hr exposure = 1.8in/hr 2hrs exposure = 1.58in/hr 90 minute FRR fire test on 270mm x 415mm glulam beam (from APA)

Wood -Fire fundamentals Calculating an FRR NYCBC 721.6 What is the area (b x d) needed?

18 Wood -Fire fundamentals Calculating an FRR NYCBC What is the area (b x d) needed? What additional wood cover is required, for an FRR (B x D) The difference (B b) is the sacrificial char layer TR-10 Fig 1-2

19 Wood Fire guidance FRR of wood NDS Chapter 16 Method explained in detail in TR-10 NDS is a compliant methodology for determining exposed wood FRR Includes method for CLT

20 Fire Testing

22 22

23 23

24 24

25 25

26 Hasburgh, FPL FPInnovations 26 FPInnovations FPInnovations

Exposed Timber Accounting for the added fuel Fire testing to date: Canada FPInnovations and NRC Switzerland ETH Sweden SP UK University of Edinburgh

27 Exposed Timber Accounting for the added fuel Fire testing to date: Canada FPInnovations and NRC Switzerland ETH Sweden SP UK University of Edinburgh and Arup Australia University of Queensland US Fire Protection Research Foundation 27 US ICC double story compartment University of Edinburgh and Arup

28 What is the fire? NRC, Canada

29 29 Real building fire testing Fire Protection Research Foundation

30 30

31 31

32 Real building fire testing ICC Tests

Image from: Zelinka, Samuel L.; Hasburgh, Laura E.

33 Image from: Zelinka, Samuel L.; Hasburgh, Laura E.; Bourne, Keith J.; Tucholski, David R.; Ouellette, Jason P. (In press). Compartment fire testing of a two-story cross laminated timber (CLT) building. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-247. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.

Compartment fire testing of a two-story cross laminated timber (CLT) building.

34 Image from: Zelinka, Samuel L.; Hasburgh, Laura E.; Bourne, Keith J.; Tucholski, David R.; Ouellette, Jason P. (In press). Compartment fire testing of a two-story cross laminated timber (CLT) building. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-247. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.

36 Image from: Zelinka, Samuel L.; Hasburgh, Laura E.; Bourne, Keith J.; Tucholski, David R.; Ouellette, Jason P. (In press). Compartment fire testing of a two-story cross laminated timber (CLT) building. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-247. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.

38 Images from: Zelinka, Samuel L.; Hasburgh, Laura E.; Bourne, Keith J.; Tucholski, David R.; Ouellette, Jason P. (In press). Compartment fire testing of a two-story cross laminated timber (CLT) building. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-247. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.

39 What does the test data show? Fire self-extinguishing (Test 3) Fire re-growth (Test 1) 39 Carleton University CLT compartment fire tests

40 What does the test data show? Fire self-extinguishing (Test 3) Fire re-growth (Test 5) 40 FPRF fire tests 1-3 and 1-5 (one wall exposed)

1hr of endurance E119 test, CLT floor after 2hrs, with char

41 CLT performance in fire Char fall off does not consistently occur Associated with certain adhesives Occurs well after 1hr of endurance E119 test, CLT floor after 2hrs, with char fall-off E119 test, CLT floor after 2hrs, with no char fall-off 41

42 Fire fundamentals: CLT

43 CLT performance in fire β= 1.5 /hr β= 3.0 /hr β= 1.5 /hr β= 3.0 /hr β= 1.5 /hr 1 1 Char fall off results in increased char rate at adhesive lines

44 CLT performance in fire A lot of fire testing has occurred CLT char fall-off is not new. Char fall off is caused primarily by adhesive type Char fall-off has a number of impacts, but they are predictable Char rate methodology developed for CLT Handbook and NDS, includes char fall-off Char fall off occurs outside the necessary fire endurance time frame for Type III, IV and V construction 44 New adhesives being used that have been proven to prevent char fall-off (issue identified, now being resolved) University of Edinburgh and Arup

45 What about mass timber connections? CLT panel to panel connections - resolved through testing Bearing condition matters Glulam beam to column shear connections: - No off-the-shelf solutions 45

Concealed steel plates Concealed bolts or dowels Design to

46 Mass timber connections Can be expressed where no fire rating is required Where exposed and need a 1 hrfrr: Concealed steel plates Concealed bolts or dowels Design to conceal the whole connection Some connections will need detailed analysis

75 x 24 (273mm x 610mm) Column = 15 square (381mm) CLT =

47 Glulam Connection Fire Testing Beam 1 = 8.75 x 18 (222mm x 457mm) Beam 2 & 3 = x 24 (273mm x 610mm) Column = 15 square (381mm) CLT = 5ply 6.7 (170mm) thick Beam 1 = Loaded to 4,700 lbs (21kN) Beam 2 & 3 = Loaded to 20,000 lbs (90kN) 47

48 Beam 1 = Ricon 290 Beam 2 = 2 x Ricon 200

49 Beam 3 = Megant 430

57 Proven Fire Rated Glulam Beam Column Connections (ASTM E119) TEST BEAM CONNECTOR FRR x 18 (222mm x 457mm) x 24 (273mm x 610mm) x 24 (273mm x 610mm) 1 x Ricon hr 2 x Ricon hr Megant hr Test reports issued see ReThink Wood website Partners: Softwood Lumber Board Arup MyTiCon 57 DR Johnson

58 Exposed Wood? Not all authorities are supportive of exposed wood Sometimes an alternative materials submission is required to support use Significant variance in interpretation of the NYCBC and IBC with regard to Type IV Significant fire testing has been undertaken Fire testing can be used to support projects

59 Questions? David Barber Arup

FULL-SCALE FIRE TESTS OF A TWO-STORY CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER STRUCTURE

FULL-SCALE FIRE TESTS OF A TWO-STORY CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER STRUCTURE Laura E. Hasburgh 1, Samuel L. Zelinka 1, Keith J. Bourne 1, David R. Tucholski 2, Jason P. Ouellette 2 ABSTRACT: There is a current