CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Design Review Coastal Development Permit 10-49

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Design Review Coastal Development Permit 10-49"

Transcription

1 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: TO: CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: PREPARED BY: September 9, 2010 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Design Review Coastal Development Permit Lance Polster, Architect Coast Highway APN # Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, the project is categorically exempt under Section 15301, Class l(d) (Existing Facilities) that allows restoration or rehabilitation of deteriorated or damaged structures to meet current standards of public health and safety. Belinda Ann Riva, Planning Technician REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests design review and a coastal development permit to rebuild a fire-damaged single-family residence and to construct an addition (1,157 square feet) greater than 10 percent of the existing floor area in the R-l zone. Design review is required for upper level additions, skylights, elevated decks/terraces (840 square feet), pool and spa, water feature, air conditioning units, grading, retaining walls, landscaping, construction in an environmentally sensitive area due to water quality and oceanfront proximity and to maintain existing nonconforming site conditions including building height, parking in front setback and additional building setback (rear). BACKGROUND: The project site is located at Coast Highway in the R-l zone, on the oceanfront side of Coast Highway between Aliso Circle and Country Club Road. City records show an original 1973 building permit for a two-story single-family residence (2,264 square feet) with an attached two-car garage (441 square feet). The topography of the 6,321 square-foot lot is characterized by a relatively steep lot with an average downward slope of approximately 30 percent. On November 14,2009, a structure fire destroyed the entire house with the exception of the attached garage. The proposed project includes restoration of the original house in addition to new construction of a lower third level including family room, bathroom, terrace and mechanical area in addition to expansion of existing living areas on upper and middle levels. STAFF ANAL YSIS: Access: Site access is gained from Coast Highway along the southeast comer of the lot. A 26 foot wide by 51-foot long reciprocal easement shared between the project site and the property

2 Design Review Coastal Development Permit September 9, 2010 Page 2 immediately to the south allows the existing two-car garage to maintain a 25-foot unobstructed backup area for onsite turnaround. Based on gross floor area less than 3,600 square feet, the site requires a total of two covered onsite parking spaces. The existing beach access stair and landings are located along the south property line and split between the subject site and the adjacent property with a reciprocal easement toward the rear of the lot. A permit has been issued to rebuild the fire-damaged beach stairs "in-kind." Design Articulation: The lower levels ofthe house are located below street level, hidden by the steep slope of the lot. The proposed project creates a third level of living area but maintains existing roof elevations prior to the fire. These modifications do not appear to contribute excessively to the mass ofthe structure since the property maintains a one-story appearance from street view. From the beach, the house appears as a three-story structure with a recessed lower level into the hillside. The proposed lower level addition complies with the 30-foot maximum building height from lowest finished floor since the roof in this area will be rebuilt as flat ridges. Pursuant to LBMC Section , the nonconforming structure may be restored up to the original size, placement and density. The applicant plans to rebuild the roof and rear portion of the structure with nonconforming building height that exceeds 30 feet from natural grade and encroaches into the additional building setback. Design Integrity: Existing architectural features will be reconstructed in-kind with proposed elements to compliment and match the contemporary style. New materials include off-white stucco, window and door trim highlighted in dark brown and painted standing seam metal roofing in an orange tone. The colored elevations depict only the areas ofproposed additions. Environmental Context: The property is located in an environmentally sensitive area due to water quality and oceanfront proximity. The proposed grading includes a total of 239 cubic yards of cut and 262 cubic yards of fill for a new import of 23 cubic yards. The new 39' x 12' infinity edge pool maintains a minimum five-foot setback from the rear property line; the pool lies approximately 10 feet from the edge of beach sand and is situated above natural grade. The design incorporates a fire feature in the front courtyard and an outdoor gas fireplace for the lower level terrace. Landscape/Hardscape: A landscape plan has been prepared with the project submittal for upper level additions. Vegetation in the rear of the property in the buffer area between the house and the edge of sand was destroyed during the fire. New rear landscaping includes Sea Grape, Pride of Madeira, Kangaroo Paw, Ivy Geranium, Bougainvillea and Senicio Madraliscae. Some existing front landscaping that survived the fire shall remain including the 48-inch yucca tree and 24-inch palm tree located along the front property line. All other existing landscaping including the 10-inch pine, 8-inch palm and palm cluster will be removed and replaced with new plants. The applicant proposes impervious surfaces to encompass 79 percent oftotal lot area. Lighting and Glare: The applicant provided an exterior lighting plan with the project submittal. The applicant proposes four new skylights in the center where the roof has been modified with a flat pitch and lowered from the pre-fire roof ridge elevation.

3 Design Review Coastal Development Permit September 9, 2010 Page 3 Neighborhood Compatibility: The house located at Coast Highway maintains a mirror floor plan of the subject property prior to the fire. The proposed program is approximately 4,153 square feet including 3,599 square feet of living area, 99 square feet of mechanical area and 455 square feet of garage area. Neighborhood comparisons of surrounding and recently approved development may be useful in evaluating the amount of total program requested. The applicant has not provided comparisons for staff to verify. Privacy: The design expands outdoor living areas on the new third level toward the rear of the property. As part of the design for the new lower level terrace and pool area, the applicant proposes landscaping on all sides to shield visibility for the neighboring properties and from beach view. The two adjacent neighbors have not expressed any privacy concerns to City staff. Swimming Pools, Spas, Water Features and Mechanical Equipment: The applicant proposes a new infinity pool and spa in the rear of the house with mechanical equipment contained in a vault on the lower level of the house. In order to comply with pool security requirements, the design includes a six-foot high metal fence. A new water feature would be located in the existing front courtyard area, five feet from the south property line. Two air conditioning units are located between the existing garage and the right side yard. These units maintain a minimum five foot setback from the north property line and placed at a distance least 60 feet from the adjacent building to the north. View Equity: The proposed additions are located within the existing building footprint and rooflines, which do not appear to alter the structure's exterior appearance prior to fire damage. No view impacts have been identified. Guideline Violations: No guideline violations noted. Requested Variances: No variances requested. Nonconforming Conditions: The following nonconforming site conditions shall be subject to design review: Building height measured above grade: No existing buildings or structures shall have a height greater than 30 feet when slope exceeds 20 percent [LBMC (D)(1)(a)]; Parking space in front setback: Front yards shall not be used for the regular or constant parking ofautomobiles or other vehicles [LBMC (2)(a)]; and, Additional building setback (rear): [LBMC (D)]. Coastal Development Permit: A Coastal Development Permit is required for all new structures within the coastal zone. Finding 1: The project is in conformity with all the applicable provisions of the General Plan, including the Certified Local Coastal Program and any applicable specific plans in that the project provides an area of conservation which buffers the adjacent environmentally sensitive

4 Design Review Coastal Development Permit September 9, 2010 Page 4 area from the proposed development and a landscape plan has been prepared which protects the existing native vegetation in the buffer area to the greatest extent possible. (IC); and Finding 2: Any development located between the sea and the first public road paralleling the sea is in conformity with the certified local coastal program and with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that vertical and lateral access exists to and along this portion of the coast and the proposed development will not create any adverse impacts to this access; therefore, no clear nexus can be demonstrated in this case for a public access dedication (2B). Finding 3: The proposed development will not have any significant adverse impacts on the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project is in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations set forth in the Municipal Code and will not cause any significant adverse impacts on the environment (3A). COMMUNITY INTEREST: A neighbor has expressed a view equity concern regarding the existing palm tree toward the front ofthe property. IDENTIFIED ISSUES: Nonconforming site conditions include building height, parking in front setback and additional building setback (rear). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Pre-Application Site Meeting - July 20, Color and Material Sample Board 3. Vicinity Map 4. Aerial Photo (prior to fire damage)

5 City of Laguna Beach - Community Development Department Pre-Application Site Development Review Meeting Evaluation Evaluation Meeting Number: Date: 7120/10 Planner: Nancy Csira met with Lance Polster, architect. The owner was not present. Site Address: Coast Highway Zone/Specific Plan: R-l Assessor Parcel Number: Background: The existing single-family home was destroyed by fire in October The existing garage currently exists and is proposed to be repaired. The residence at Coast Highway is a mirage image of the subject property. These properties are designed to provide the required on-site turnaround within a reciprocal easement. Both houses were granted a variance to be built 10 feet from the ultimate right-of-way instead of20 feet. Staff observed that the fire damaged living area, the landscaping and beach stairs have all been removed from the rear of the site. The site has some loose soil and has been sand bagged along the beach sand. A temporary chain link fence has been installed around the demolished areas. Some landscaping, the partially damaged garage and paving currently exist along the Coast Highway front portion ofthe site. A permit currently exists to re-build the beach stairs "in-kind". The stairs are located within a reciprocal easement with the adjacent property (31051 Coast Highway). Development Standards: Front Setback: 20 feet Rear Setback: 20 feetlsand/stringline Side Setback: 10 feet combined (4 foot minimum) Lot slope in percent: >20% Height: 15 feet above the curb and 30 feet above natural grade, finished grade or lowest finished floor whichever is more restrictive Building Site Coverage (BSC): 39% or 2,434 square-feet Parking: 2 covered parking spaces (8'-8" x 18'-0" each) Landscape Guidelines: Neighborhood 12 of the City's Landscape and Scenic Highways Resource Document Design Review Criteria 1. Access: Conflicts between vehicles, pedestrians and other modes oftransportation should be minimized by specifically providing for each applicable mode of transportation. The proposed addition reviewed in zoning plan check is less than 50% of the original floor area. Therefore, no new sidewalk will be required and the 10' Coast Highway right-of-way dedication will not be required. The 20-foot front setback is measured from the future 10' right-of-way dedication line.

6 On-site turnaround is provided within a reciprocal easement with the adjacent property which was originally built and is a mirror image of the subject property. One on-site parking space is currently provided partially within the front setback area and right-of-way dedication area. 2. Design Articulation: Within the allowable envelope, the appearance ofbuilding and retaining wall mass should be minimized Articulation techniques including, but not limited to, separation, offsets, terracing and reducing the size ofanyone element in the structure may be used to reduce the appearance ofmass. The proposed structure will include the rebuilding of to main sloped roofs, one over the garage and one over the main living area. The roof between the two rebuilt ridges will be flat and is proposed in this manner to be able to add living area below the original structure. This allows the addition and does not create a new height variance. 3. Design Integrity: Consistency with the applicant's chosen style of architecture should be achieved by the use ofappropriate materials and details. It is unclear if a chosen architectural style has been chosen. The zoning plans represent a similar contemporary structure. Exterior finish materials have not been indicated on the plans. 4. Environmental Context: Development should preserve and, where possible, enhance the city's scenic natural setting. Natural foatures, such as existing heritage trees, rock out-cropping, ridgelines and significant watercourses should be protected Existing terrain should be utilized in the design and grading should be minimized 5. General Plan Compliance: The development shall comply with all applicable policies of the general plan, including all of its elements, applicable specific plans, and the local coastal program. 6. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be incorporated as an integrated part of the structure's design and relate harmoniously to neighborhood and community landscaping themes. View equity shall be an important consideration in the landscape design. The relevant landscaping guidelines contained in the city's Landscape and Scenic Highways Resource Document should be incorporated, as appropriate, in the design and planned maintenance ofproposed landscaping. 7. Lighting and Glare: Adequate lighting for individual and public safoty shall be provided in a manner which does not significantly impact neighboring properties. Reflective materials and appurtenances that cause glare or a negative visual impact (e.g., skylights, white rock roofs, high-gloss ceramic tile roofs, reflective glass, etc.) should be avoided or mitigated to a level of insignificance in those locations where those surfaces are visible from neighboring properties. 8. Neighborhood Compatibility: Development shall be compatible with the existing development in the neighborhood and respect neighborhood character. Neighborhood character is the sum ofthe qualities that distinguish areas within the

7 city, including historical patterns ofdevelopment (e.g., structural heights, mass, scale or size), village atmosphere, landscaping themes and architectural styles. 9. Privacy: The placement of activity areas, (e.g., decks, picture windows and ceremonial or entertainment rooms) in locations that would result in a substantial invasion ofprivacy ofneighboring properties should be minimized. It appears that the new terraces and pool area below the existing structure should not impact the directly adjacent properties as no existing improvements are located at this lower elevation. 10. Swimming Pools: Swimming pools, spas and water features shall be located, designed and constructed where: (a) Geology conditions allow; (b) Noise produced by circulatory mechanical pumps and equipment is mitigated; and (c) Any associated fencing or other site improvements are compatible with neighboring properties. Preliminary geological information is useful to the Board when evaluating the site for the proposed pool, spa and associated terraces which are proposed to be partially out of grade. The pool equipment is proposed to be enclosed in its own room on the lowest level. Two air conditioning units are proposed to be located behind the garage. It appears that the location should not impact the adjacent neighbor due to the existing location of the structures on the adjacent property. 11. View Equity: The development, including its landscaping, shall be designed to protect existing views from neighboring properties without denying the subject property the reasonable opportunity to develop as described and illustrated in the city's "design guidelines.)) The "design guidelines)) are intended to balance preservation ofviews with the right to develop property. Since all additions are proposed to be within the existing footprint and roofline, no view issues are apparent. Potential Variance Issues: No variance requests are anticipated. Special Processing Requirements: The proposed project requires design review and a coastal development permit for upper level additions, skylights, elevated decks/terraces, pool, spa, air conditioning units, grading, retaining walls, landscaping, and construction in an environmentally sensitive area due to oceanfront and water quality. Since the proposed additions are greater than 10% of the existing floor area, design review is required to maintain the existing nonconforming site conditions including parking space in front setback, building height measured above grade, beach stairs, and additional building setback at the rear. This preliminary evaluation is being provided to applicants and their design advisors to utilize as early as possible in the design stage of a contemplated project so that the ensuing design is more likely to meet the Design Review Board's approval before substantial time and resources have been expended. However, tbis preliminary evaluation provided by starr does not bind tbe Design Review Board in any manner in its review of or decisions on an application.

8 MATERIALS LEGEND ROOFING : pmad.liding"'" met.! roof DE 997I-1oc'1e)COI.i) STuceo: Dunn-Edwards WNtieSP14 DOOR.ncI WINDOW TRIM: Dunn-Edwards Aztec Pony SP 2920 uncepo...&...oc... 2(»4 So. Coat Hwy., &mt 5 lagunlbnch, C (049)"

9 " u m 0 C> 'I II II 1'1 Ii PI j-0 0

10 ,

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Design Review Coastal Development Permit 10-63

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Design Review Coastal Development Permit 10-63 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: TO: CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: PREPARED BY: December 2, 2010 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Design Review 10-198

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: April 5,2012 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE: Design Review 12-347 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: PREPARED BY:

More information

BOARD~ ADJUSTMENTIDESIGN RE ~WBOARD PROJECT OVERVIEW

BOARD~ ADJUSTMENTIDESIGN RE ~WBOARD PROJECT OVERVIEW BOARD~ ADJUSTMENTIDESIGN RE ~WBOARD PROJECT OVERVIEW LOCATION: REQUESTED ACTION: EXISTING APPROVALS: ZONING: ADDITIONAL REFERENCES: REQUIRED FINDINGS: STAFF COMMENTS: Site Address: 2165 Temple Hills Drive

More information

742 Barracuda Way APN #

742 Barracuda Way APN # CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: January 12,2012 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE: Design Review 11-217 Coastal Development Permit 11-39 APPLICANT: James Conrad,

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Coast Highway APN CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: October 13,2011 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD IBOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CASE: Variance 7717 Design Review 11-163 Coastal Development

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Design Review Revocable Encroachment Permit 11-15

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Design Review Revocable Encroachment Permit 11-15 CTY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARNG DATE: TO: CASE: APPLCANT: LOCATON: ENVRONMENTAL STATUS: PREPARED BY: October 13, 2011 DESGN REVEW BOARD Design Review 11-167 Revocable

More information

14825 Fruitvale Ave.

14825 Fruitvale Ave. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Meeting Date: August 26, 2015 Application: PDR14-0017 Location/APN: 14825 Fruitvale Ave. / 397-18-028 Applicant/Owner: Staff Planner: Sin Yong Michael Fossati 14825 Fruitvale

More information

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission ++ City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: January 08, 2018 Staff: Subject: Chris Juram, Planning Technician SS12-17 Miramar Homebuilders, R-20 Zoning: Request

More information

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES MANUAL The following checklist summarizes development guidelines and standards. See the appropriate section for a complete explanation of the

More information

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Steinert Residence. Belinda Ann Deines, Planning Technician (949)

DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Steinert Residence. Belinda Ann Deines, Planning Technician (949) CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: July 12,2012 TO: DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE: Design Review 12-779 Coastal Development Permit 12-781 Revocable Encroachment

More information

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

Infill Residential Design Guidelines Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org

More information

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission

City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission City of Lafayette Study Session Staff Report Design Review Commission Meeting Date: April 24, 2017 Staff: Payal Bhagat, Senior Planner Subject: HDP18-15 & HDP31-15 Ramesh Patel & Melcor Development (Owners),

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Michael Klein, Planner FILE NO.: 150000780 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: A request for a Site Plan

More information

RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST RESIDENTIAL GUIDELINES CHECKLIST The following checklist was created to provide you with an easy way to ensure that your project complies with the Residential Design Guidelines. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT APRIL 7, 2016 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Talyn Mirzakhanian, Senior Planner FILE NO.: 160001710 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: A request for a

More information

City of Lafayette Staff Report

City of Lafayette Staff Report City of Lafayette Staff Report For: By: Design Review Commission Greg Wolff, Senior Planner Meeting Date: April 27, 2015 Subject: SS03-15 Gundi & Peter Younger (Owners), R-40 Zoning: Request for a Study

More information

A. General Plan: Land Use, Growth Management and the Built Environment Element. d. Use visually unobtrusive building materials.

A. General Plan: Land Use, Growth Management and the Built Environment Element. d. Use visually unobtrusive building materials. Chapter 16 Hillside Protection 16.010 Purpose This chapter establishes the regulations for development and alteration of properties in hillside and ridgeline areas in order to preserve the essential scenic

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Mojgan Momenan, Danielian Associates

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Mojgan Momenan, Danielian Associates CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: August 12,2010 TO: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE: Design Review 10-108 Coastal Development Permit 10-36 APPLICANT:

More information

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions: Site Design (Table 2) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions: BACKGROUND WHAT IS SITE DESIGN? Site design refers to the arrangement of buildings and open spaces on adjacent sites to maximize the shared benefits

More information

Chapter RM MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ZONES

Chapter RM MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ZONES Chapter 19.17 RM MULTI FAMILY BUILDING ZONES 19.17.010 Established 19.17.020 Primary Permitted Uses 19.17.030 Accessory Permitted Uses 19.17.040 Secondary Permitted Uses 19.17.050 Conditional Property

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director

More information

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES

36.1. PURPOSE APPLICABILITY DESIGN REVIEW GUIDELINES CHAPTER 36: DESIGN STANDARDS 36.1. PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to ensure that projects are designed and constructed consistent with the Community Design Subelement of the Land Use Element and

More information

409 Pearl Street APN #

409 Pearl Street APN # CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: January 12,2012 TO: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE: Design Review 11-151 Variance 7716 APPLICANT: LOCATION:

More information

Design Guidelines -- A Guide to Residential Development. City of Laguna Beach

Design Guidelines -- A Guide to Residential Development. City of Laguna Beach Design Guidelines -- A Guide to Residential Development City of Laguna Beach December 7, 2010 Welcome to Laguna Beach Laguna Beach: a paradise, an inexhaustible source of inspiration. -artist Marco Sassone,

More information

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS Prepared by Planning Staff 10/28/2013 APPLICABLE GOALS, POLICIES AND PROGRAMS FROM the LAND USE CHAPTER Goal LU-1 Policy LU-1.1 Policy LU-1.2 Goal LU-2 Protect the character

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT NOVEMBER 15, 2012 TO: FROM: Members of the Planning Commission Michael Klein, Associate Planner FILE NO.: 120000890 PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: Request for an Administrative

More information

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary

Example Codes. City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary Example Codes City of Brentwood, Tennessee Brentwood Hillside Protection Overlay District Summary The City of Brentwood in July 2007 adopted a Hillside Protection (HP) Overlay District to address the problems

More information

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION NO. 2018- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BELMONT APPROVING A SINGLE-FAMILY DESIGN REVIEW AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT FOR A VACANT LOT ON LOWER LOCK AVENUE (APN: 043-042-750,

More information

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES

IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES IV.B. VISUAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing Visual Character Project Site The project site is located at 17331-17333 Tramonto Drive in the Pacific Palisades community of the City of Los Angeles

More information

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural

More information

Chapter YARDS AND SETBACKS

Chapter YARDS AND SETBACKS Chapter 19.48 YARDS AND SETBACKS Sections: 19.48.010 Yards and setbacks Requirements generally. 19.48.020 Front yards Requirements generally. 19.48.030 Variable front setback lines. 19.48.040 Front yard

More information

ARTICLE II CITYWIDE REGULATIONS

ARTICLE II CITYWIDE REGULATIONS ARTICLE II CITYWIDE REGULATIONS RZC 21.24 FENCES Fences User Guide 21.24.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide for fences that: A. Protect or enhance property and life and that are compatible

More information

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5)

OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5) OCEAN BOULEVARD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PD-5) Ordinance History: C-5562, 1982 The intent of the Planned Development Plan is to provide a framework to guide new development in a way that is sensitive

More information

Design Review Commission Report

Design Review Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:

More information

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas;

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Kalama has many areas of timberland and open areas inside its City limits adjacent to residential areas; ORDINANCE NO. 1342 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF KALAMA, WASHINGTON ADOPTING A NEW KALAMA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 17.20 ESTATE LOT FLOATING ZONE TO PROVIDE TRANSITIONAL ZONING OPTIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

More information

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION II OF TITLE 20--COASTAL ZONING CODE CHAPTER 20.504 VISUAL RESOURCE AND SPECIAL TREATMENT AREAS Sec. 20.504.005 Applicability. Sec. 20.504.010 Purpose. Sec. 20.504.015 Highly Scenic Areas. Sec. 20.504.020 Special Communities and Neighborhoods.

More information

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SPECIAL LAND USE Date City Official App. Filing Fee Rec'd ($350) NOTE TO APPLICANT: Please submit this application for Site Plan Review along with twenty (20) copies

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,

More information

Design Review Coastal Development Permit 10-62

Design Review Coastal Development Permit 10-62 CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: TO: CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENT AL STATUS: PREPARED BY: March 10,2011 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Design Review 10-195

More information

SECTION 39. Title V, Chapter 6, Article 2, added to the Zoning Code of Sacramento County shall read as follows: GREENBACK LANE SPECIAL PLANNING AREA

SECTION 39. Title V, Chapter 6, Article 2, added to the Zoning Code of Sacramento County shall read as follows: GREENBACK LANE SPECIAL PLANNING AREA SECTION 39. Title V, Chapter 6, Article 2, added to the Zoning Code of Sacramento County shall read as follows: GREENBACK LANE SPECIAL PLANNING AREA 506-20. INTENT. It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors

More information

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC)

PC RESOLUTION NO ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 15-035, INN AT

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Meeting: February 3, 2014 Agenda Item: 7.9 To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Scott Albright,

More information

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008 Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:

More information

FOR MEETING OF: DECEMBER 18, 2018 CASE NO.: DR-CU-SPR-DAP18-06 AGENDA ITEM: 6.1 PLANNING COMMISSION LISA ANDERSON-OGILVIE, AICP PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR

FOR MEETING OF: DECEMBER 18, 2018 CASE NO.: DR-CU-SPR-DAP18-06 AGENDA ITEM: 6.1 PLANNING COMMISSION LISA ANDERSON-OGILVIE, AICP PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR FOR MEETING OF: DECEMBER 18, 2018 CASE NO.: DR-CU-SPR-DAP18-06 AGENDA ITEM: 6.1 TO: FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION LISA ANDERSON-OGILVIE, AICP PLANNING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW CONDITIONAL USE SITE

More information

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT

REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT REZONING APPLICATION MPD SUPPLEMENT For Staff Use Only: DATE/TIMESTAMP: ZA# RECEIVED BY: The intent of the Master Planned District (MPD) designation is to allow flexibility in the design and construction

More information

AMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL

AMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL AMEND DMENT TO LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD MASTER PLAN H HOSPITAL ZONE DISTRICT Village of Ridgewood Planning Board February 28, 2014with technical revisions from June 9, 2014 Planning Board

More information

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016

DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016 DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2016 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: THE PLANNING COMMISSION LISA COSTA SANDERS, TOWN PLANNER REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL STRUCTURES PERMIT FOR A POOL IN THE SIDE YARD AND

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: CC: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: May 21, 2018 Agenda Item: 8-A Grace Page, Senior Planner Stephanie Reich, AIA, LEED

More information

City of Lafayette Study Session Project Data

City of Lafayette Study Session Project Data City of Lafayette Study Session Project Data For: Design Review Commission By: Michael P. Cass, Senior Planner Date: August 24, 2015 Property Address: 954 Mountain View Drive APN: 243-070-011 Zoning District:

More information

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014

HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014 HISTORIC LANDMARK COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Front Yard Terracing PLNHLC2014-00362 259 South 1200 East Meeting Date: August 7, 2014 Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development Applicant:

More information

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 404 MASTER PLANNING IV 13 404 MASTER PLANNING Master Planning through the Site Analysis (Master Planning Site Analysis) or Planned Development (Master Planning Planned Development) is provided to encourage development which

More information

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR

Nob Hill Pipeline Improvements Project EIR Section 3.1 Aesthetics This section addresses the visual aspects that may affect the views experienced by the public, including the potential to impact the existing character of each area that comprises

More information

Commercial Development Permit Area

Commercial Development Permit Area City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial

More information

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013

Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013 What is being considered? Fact Sheet Regulating Oceanfront Accessory Structures Updated June 10, 2013 The Town of Duck is considering an ordinance that would limit how close pools, decks, and other accessory

More information

MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for McKinley Appeal of Webb Single Family Dwelling

MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for McKinley Appeal of Webb Single Family Dwelling MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for McKinley Appeal of Webb Single Family Dwelling Staff Report Date: June 29, 2016 Case No.: 16APL-00000-00011, 16APL- 00000-00016 Environmental Document: Notice

More information

open space environment

open space environment This section updated August 09 GUIDELINE TO THE RULES The Open Space Environment Rules apply to activities on sites within the Open Space Environment as shown on the Human Environments Maps. Most of the

More information

File No (Continued)

File No (Continued) (Continued) Request for: (1) a Site Plan Review; (2) a Variance (to build on a significant ridgeline); (3) an Oak Tree Permit (to encroach into the protected zone of 25 oak trees and for potential thinning

More information

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church

Analysis of Environs of 1000 New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church Item No. 3: L-14-00028 p.1 Analysis of Environs of New York Street, German Methodist Episcopal Church Step One Historical Significance and Context According to the application for Historic Landmark Designation,

More information

4 Residential and Urban Living Zones

4 Residential and Urban Living Zones 4 Residential and Urban Living Zones Refer to Chapters 11 to 20 for additional rules that may apply to these zones. 4.1 OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Objective Res1 Policy 1 Policy 2 Policy 3 Policy 4 Policy

More information

PC RESOLUTION NO

PC RESOLUTION NO PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-01-14-02 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP fttm) 17441. REZONE {RZ) 13-003, ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 13-003, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRP) 13-052. GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 13-002. CONDITIONAL

More information

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Planner Kristine Gay Applicant/Owner Ocean Rental Properties, LLC Public Hearing April 13, 2016 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item 1 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront

More information

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: May 23, 2018 TO: FROM: Planning Commission Planning Staff SUBJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Consideration of an appeal of the Community Development

More information

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2015 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair McCormick and Members of the Design Review Committee Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Kelly Christensen

More information

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM ) Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What

More information

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT

MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT Zoning regulations developed by committee to the Planning Board for the Town of DeWitt, NY Issue date: 13 July 2017 revised 3/12/2018, revised 4/26/2018, 5/9/2018

More information

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods

City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods DRAFT - September 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Policy Context 3 3. Characteristics

More information

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY

DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS CITY OF LANGLEY I. INTRODUCTION The City of Langley is fortunate to have a strong sense of place and unique quality. This comes in part from its special setting along Saratoga Passage,

More information

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials

Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property incompatible fencing materials garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park Lack of plantings as a buffer between private property and open

More information

Residential Design Guidelines

Residential Design Guidelines Residential Design Guidelines Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines Introduction These guidelines seek to provide property owners, designers and developers with a clear understanding of the City

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009 Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009 Project: Warda Warehouse File: EG-08-051 Request: Design Review Location: 9260 Bendel Place APNs: 134-0660-004 Planner: Gerald Park Property Owner/Applicant

More information

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South

PLNPCM Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking Lot at Redwood Road and 1700 South Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Casey Stewart; 801-535-6260 Date: November 4, 2016 Re: PLNPCM2015-00874 Carl s Jr. Commercial Parking

More information

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 16-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING

More information

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN

The Village. Chapter 3. Mixed Use Development Plan SPECIFIC PLAN The Village SPECIFIC PLAN Chapter 3 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3.1.1 Purpose This Chapter describes the development regulations applicable to the Mixed-Use and Transit Center Planning Areas. These form-based regulations

More information

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003

Resolution : Exhibit A. Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 Resolution 03-011: Exhibit A Downtown District Design Guidelines March 2003 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS Adopted March 2003 1 DOWNTOWN DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted

More information

Article 6 Tree Protection

Article 6 Tree Protection Article 6 Tree Protection 8.1 Purpose 8.2 Applicability 8.2.1 General Provisions 8.2.2 Exemptions 8.3 Permitting Procedure 8.4 Planting Procedure 8.5 Performance Guarantee Required for Belated Planting

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. January 23, 2014 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Design Review

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. January 23, 2014 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. Design Review CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: TO: CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: PREPARED BY: January 23, 2014 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Design Review 13-1232

More information

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and 1102 DESIGN REVIEW 1102.01 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY Section 1102 is adopted to provide standards, criteria, and procedures under which design review may be approved. Design review is required for: A.

More information

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. TO: Parking and Public Improvements Commission

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. TO: Parking and Public Improvements Commission Clay Curtin, Management Analyst (I the same walls at a maximum of 1 foot tall. Section 7.36.150 of the Municipal Code permits BY: Eric Haaland, Associate Planner right-of-way) between walkways leading

More information

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 7

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 7 Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission REPORT ITEM 7 MEETING DATE: September 1, 2015 APPLICATION NO: 225 Placerville Drive Site Plan

More information

CITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REPORT DATE: 4/12/16 AGENDA ITEM: 5

CITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REPORT DATE: 4/12/16 AGENDA ITEM: 5 CITY OF BELVEDERE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REPORT DATE: 4/12/16 AGENDA ITEM: 5 MEETING DATE: 4/19/16 TO: FROM: REVIEWED BY: SUBJECT: City of Belvedere Planning Commission Rebecca Markwick, Associate

More information

DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT

DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE SECOND SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT (REVISED) ADOPTED BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 REVISED OCTOBER 23, 1998 REVISED AUGUST

More information

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25 DESIGN REVIEW. 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a

More information

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Steve Kawaratani, Applicant Phone (949)

CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Steve Kawaratani, Applicant Phone (949) CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: June 28, 2012 TO: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT/DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CASE: Design Review 12-991 Variance 12-993 APPLICANT: LOCATION:

More information

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015 Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros November 10, 2015 TECHNICAL REVIEW OVERVIEW Purpose of this Report Outline issues with current Ordinance Present preliminary approaches for revisions Set drafting

More information

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MALIBU, CONSIDERING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED CRUMMER SITE SUBDIVISION FINAL EIR AND MAKING

More information

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist

MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES Site Plan and Design Review Principles Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for

More information

Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer

Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer Deb Grube, Sr. Zoning Officer Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Administrative Code NR 115 under the authority of Wisconsin Statute 59.692, establishes and provides that shoreland zoning regulations

More information

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California 90630 (714) 229-6720 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS 1. Discuss project with Planning staff to determine zoning regulations, any unusual characteristics

More information

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and,

5.1.1 The streetscape along US Highway 64 (Brevard Road); and, The built environment within new residential developments; and, Article 5. Landscaping 5.1 Purpose The Town of Laurel Park s landscape standards are designed to create a beautiful, aesthetically pleasing built environment that will complement and enhance community

More information

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN PROCESS TYPE III IS USED References to Process Type III applications are found in several places in the Milton Municipal Code (MMC), indicating that the development, activity, or use, is permitted

More information

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE

CHAPTER ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE CITY OF MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.31 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN THE NC, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL ZONE Sections: 18.31.010 Purpose 18.31.020 Minimum Lot Area 18.31.030 Setbacks 18.31.040 Maximum

More information

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS

WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a safe, vibrant mixed-use urban

More information

Chapter 7 General Plan Compliance

Chapter 7 General Plan Compliance Chapter 7 The development shall comply with all applicable policies of the General Plan, including all of its elements, applicable specific plans and certified local coastal program. -LBMC 25.05.040(H)

More information

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN) Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

More information

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS Name of Project: Poulsbo Meadows; A Planned Residential Development (PRD)/Plat Applicants Name: PBH Group LLC/Byron Harris PO Box 1010 Silverdale, WA 98038 Description

More information

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

PC RESOLUTION NO GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM)

PC RESOLUTION NO GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) PC RESOLUTION NO. 16-07-26- GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 16-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 16-006,

More information

Urban Planning and Land Use

Urban Planning and Land Use Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: Board

More information