HELP SHAPE THE PLACE ENGAGEMENT BARWON HEADS STRUCTURE PLAN UPDATE UNEDITED OUTPUTS. November 2016 REPORT

Transcription

1 BARWON HEADS STRUCTURE PLAN UPDATE HELP SHAPE THE PLACE ENGAGEMENT November 2016 UNEDITED OUTPUTS REPORT

2 Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Engagement Unedited Outputs Report Introduction The HELP SHAPE THE PLACE engagement activities for the Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update were held during October and November A HELP SHAPE THE PLACE workshop was attended by around 60 people working in groups to discuss solutions for managing development in Barwon Heads. Two drop in sessions were held during the day and evening where residents could come and speak to Council representatives. Around 60 people attended across the two sessions. Council received over 130 submissions to the Structure Plan Update. Most submissions were submitted online on the Council s website with other submissions being received via and post. Unedited Outputs Report This report provides a provides the full unedited version of the feedback received. This is organised into three sections: Section A HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Page 2 Unedited Outputs Report Section B HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report Page 25 (Part 1). This includes the submissions received by (and did not fit in the main survey response table) as well as responses to Question 1 to 5 of the survey Section C HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report Page 77 (Part 2). This includes responses to Questions 6 to 9 and Any Further Questions of the survey. Section D HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions List of submitters Page 108 A summary of all of the submissions received is provided in the Help Shape the Place Engagement Report What next for the Structure Plan Update? Feedback from the Help Shape the Place engagement will be used to inform the preparation of a Draft Barwon Heads Structure Plan. It is anticipated that this will be completed in March/ April You will have the opportunity to have your say on this document. Further information Further information on the Structure Plan Update is available on the Council s website. Please go to and visit the Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update 2016 page. Or contact: André Schmid, Project Manager by phone: or aschmid@geelongcity.vic.gov.au 1

3 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Barw won Heads Structure Plan Update Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop in Sessions Unedit ted Outputs Report From: Shape the Place Workshop held Wednesday 26th Community Hall 10.00am to 2.30pm October at the Barwon Heads Drop in session one: 11am to 1pm Barwon Heads Community Hall Drop in session two: 5.30pm to 7.30pm Barwon Heads Senior Citizens Club 2

4 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Barwon Heads - Residential Character The Hansen Partnership presented their assessment of the residential character of Barwon Heads and sought input from the group about their preferences. Set out below is a summary of the feedback received Workshop Session Workshop sessions began with an introduction to character and a discussion of some of the key findings of background analysis undertaken by the project team There was general consensus in the room as to the findings of the project team. Specific feedback about particular areas was provided around: The area north of Barwon heads Road residents keen to ensure that that area was recognised as different from the remaining areas to the north and west. Clarification provided as to the fact that this area was already identified as having a more traditional character The area to the north around Heron / Wattlebird etc. was also highlighted. The project team acknowledged this as having a different character from many areas; however, this is predominantly in the public realm, relating to the informal character, lack of kerbs and street tree plantings. The session then broke into groups who were asked to consider a random selection of dwellings from within Barwon Heads to indicate whether they fit with the group s perception of Barwon Heads character. Groups were requested to consider the elements of those houses to report back what made them fit to not. Attendees were asked not to consider whether they thought the dwellings were good or not but their appropriateness within Barwon Heads. Robust and productive discussions took place before all groups reported back to the larger group. The dwellings identified as a good fit or not fitting are identified below but the key elements of character the community felt were important in ensuring a dwelling fitted with Barwon Heads character were as follows: Most important Landscape (lack of landscaping was a key concern, retention of trees) Materials (no face brickwork, weatherboard, timber) Site Coverage / Permeability Avoiding boxy or heavy forms Dominant garages and access ways Front setback (to allow for landscaping) 3

5 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Somewhat important Response to context, (i.e. not houses you could find anywhere) Side setbacks Height (human scale) Low fences Informal streetscapes (Materials x 4, not project homes / response to context, front setback / landscaping x 3, lack of vegetation x 3, site coverage x 4, lighter colours x 4, avoiding boxy forms x 6. Avoiding dominant garages x 4, side setbacks x 2, permeability, low fences x 2, roof pitches mixed, weatherboards / coastal / timber, Landscaping (informal) x 7, front setback x 6, retention of trees x 2, recessive garage, informal streetscape x 2, height (scale, human, low)) Interestingly there was general consensus that roof form was not a defining character element despite it having been identified as such in the previous character study. Houses that fit : 2, 6 x2, 8 x5, 10, 17, 22, 27, 29, 32 x3, 37 x 5, 38 x2, 39 x3, 40 x2, 41, 44 x2, 47 x2, 49 x2, 51 x2, 54, 55, 57, 66 x2, 68 x5, 69, 70 x7, 81 x3, 82 x2, 88 Dwellings that most respondents considered fit 9ie identified by 3 or more groups) were: 8, 32, 37, 39, 68, 70, 81. 4

6 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Notable features of these dwellings there are no dominant garages, where these do front the street they are open, vegetation characterises many of them, and pitched roofs are also strongly represented. With one notable exception there are no fences provided. Houses that don t fit: 1 x 3, 5, 9, 11, 12, 16 x 4, 17, 25 x 4, 30, 33, 36, 41 x 4, 42, 53 x 2, 56 x 5, 58 x 2, 59, 73, 62, 83, 84 x 5, 85 x 4 Dwellings that most respondents considered did not fit were: 1, 16, 25, 41, 56, 84, 85. 5

7 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report These dwellings are predominantly characterised by a lack of landscaping, bulky forms or dominant garages. Interestingly, a low height or modest footprint were not sufficient guarantees of fit with Barwon Heads character from stakeholder perspectives, nor was a particular roof type. Notable was the broad range of dwellings which the attendees identified as fitting, and the greater consistency among responses as to those which did not fit. An open discussion was then had around how character could be controlled. Key messages from that discussion were: Residents currently feel frustrated with the management of character, given there are no current controls, and expressed concern that they would be going through another round of consultation only to see no change. While some residents appeared to believe there should be no increased in density, the majority of the group appeared to accept that the diversification of Barwon Heads housing stock and the provision of some smaller dwellings close to the town centre was acceptable, but that the form this took needed to be appropriate. Some concern was expressed around introducing onerous controls but there appeared to be general consensus that controls which addressed the most important things but provided flexibility within that would be a balanced approach. Suggestions were made about setting minimum standards and then triggering a permit for anything outside this, although some community members were concerned this would not achieve anything and wanted more concrete controls. 6

8 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Most community members appreciated the diversity of housing styles. Some discussion was had around the Residential Growth Zone. These issues were the potential for apartment forms which would be out of character, and the currently allowable height (10.5m) and site coverage controls (70%) which were felt to be too much. It was also noted that the RGZ was encouraging significantly larger and bulkier single residences more than medium density development. Drop in Sessions Two drop-in sessions were held: Permeability / Site Coverage x 6 Materials / Simple material palette x 5 Landscaping: lack of landscaping, needs to be informal, and should reflect the surrounding environment, retention of trees x5 Modest size / Upper level setback to reduce bulk / not bulky x 3 Side setbacks (no boundary to boundary development) x 2 Height (no three storey) x 2 Simple forms Fencing Maintain coastal themes Front setback and landscape all that matters if these are done right then the form doesn t matter so much Attendees were also asked to mark on a scale what level of control they would be comfortable with, from lots of controls meaning a planning permit for everyone, to no change from the current controls. One attendee preferred not much control, and a couple identified lots, however, the majority of attendees felt there was a need for some controls but that this should be targeted to key areas only. Other comments and discussions: Taits Road informal character not being recognised in Council decisions The low scale coastal character is important for tourism. If the character becomes too suburban then the attraction will diminish and the economic opportunities will be lost. Site coverage is key in differentiating. Engaging with the streets is Important. One house in Flinders Parade was raised a number of times, in terms of excessive site coverage, overly complex mix of materials and height (including lift overrun). 7

9 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Removal of vegetation, in particular street trees is very important. Needs to be specific guidelines to the engineer to ensure that the informal character is not eroded and the soft edges approach is actually implemented. The informal nature of the street tree planting also needs to be continued (i.e. not formal avenue planting). Correlation between site overage and land values should be acknowledged (i.e. higher cost blocks mean bigger houses). One attendee with development experience within Barwon Heads identified that while 3 or 4 storeys may be possible, to do this well on existing block would be impossible, and that lots would need to be consolidated. However, lot consolidation is very difficult due to land values. The feeling was that this is likely to only occur in the town centre area. Concern was expressed that controls for town centre are coordinated with the surrounding residential area. With the aging demographic more lifts are going in and this might need to be considered in terms of heights, along with the SBO implications. Materials were again highlighted as important, simple palettes, with a strong focus on weatherboard and timber, avoiding features such as stackstone, which have a more suburban character. Point Lonsdale was identified a number of times as representing a good example, particularly regarding site overage. The difference between meeting ResCode Standards and reflecting the character was discussed number of times. While ResCode does in fact require consideration of Neighbourhood Character, looking at this too narrowly means the character will continue to be eroded. Many attendees raised retention of vegetation, with difference of opinion as to whether there should be vegetation controls or if buildings should just be sited to retain vegetation. Feedback sheets Community members also had the opportunity to identify individually houses they felt fit or didn t fit, to flag key elements they felt contributed to the character and identify the amount of controls they would be comfortable with. Seventeen additional sheets were returned. Findings from these sheets were as follows: Houses that fit 8

10 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report 2x3, 5, 6x2, 7, 8x5, 9, 10x3, 14, 17, 19, 22, 23x3, 24, 32x2 37x2, 38x3, 39x4, 40, 44 x2, 48, 50, 51, 57x2, 60, 66x3, 68x3, 69 70x3,71, 72, 74x2, 75, 78x3 80x2, 81x3, 87, 88x2 Most responses: 8, 39, Houses that don t fit 1x3, 3, 4, 6x3, 9x2, 10x2, 11x3, 12 x3, 14, 15, 16 x3, 17x4, 19, 21, 25x4, 30, 31, 33x6, 35x2, 36x2, 39, 41x2, 45x3, 48x2, 53x3, 56x5, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 71, 73, 74x2, 77x2 83, 84x3, 87x3 Most responses: 17, 25, 33, 56 Crossover (those that divided opinions): 3, 6, 9, 10, 14, 17, 19, 39, 28, 60, 71, 74, 87. Key elements: Façade width / size / appearance / blank wall x 3 Landscaping x 10 Fencing x3 Materials (limited / lighter palettes / natural) x 8 Good design Site coverage x 6 Dependable and clear policy Heritage Informal drainage Articulated second storeys / bulk x 4 Setbacks (front and side) Avoid dominant garages Density Height x4 Lot size Demolition of older dwellings Village feel / coastal design x3 Roof line Diversity of styles x2 Overlooking 9

11 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Level of controls Lots: 7 responses Some: 9 responses Not Much: 0 responses Barwon Heads: Opportunities and Challenges Working together in one group, participants identified and prioritised the issues influencing Barwon Heads at the present. The issues were then categorised as challenges and opportunities. The resultant mind map was displayed at the drop in sessions and additional comments were made. The result of this work is shown in the table below. Influence Opportunity Challenge Additional comments from Drop-In Sessions Opportunity Challenge Our natural environment Controlled access to some of the River environment areas working with Parks Coast 21 0 Victoria and Barwon Coast 4 Setting Newbay Close water catchment, bridge Significant salt marsh wetlands opportunity for park and play equipment Pressure to rezone land Concern over entrance to town expansion Farming land to housing of western boundary industrial zone Respect current boundaries On wetlands Use Ocean Grove Acre set precedence for developing on crown land 1 6 Any restrictions need to be properly developed More sporting land Need more land for aged care facilities Public transport and connection Bike track along river to Geelong Barwon Heads to Ocean Grove to recreation zones to 13 th Beach Need shuttle bus between two parking 10

12 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Influence Opportunity Challenge Additional comments from Drop-In Sessions Opportunity Challenge areas There is no access from the township to the Surf Lifesaving Club (and the road along 13 th beach is a nightmare!) High level use of Recreation Zones Park at edges and shuttle bus Cycling tracks Natural vegetation Around the town, to the Bluff is reducing 1 (loss of Need to focus on rebuilding canopy Loss of tree canopy cover and all the cover) things that come with that amenity, shade, habitat etc. The Bridge This is contributing to the destruction of the Overuse Village 6 Inappropriate development of bridge 1 Adds to traffic bank up Traffic Management and Connectivity Main Street to be one way/angle parking, Lack of cycling - road to Bridge Road Summer in particular it is bad Policing the traffic there is a lot going on Lack of car parks cars, bikes, pedestrians, dogs, prams Quality of roads from Geelong width, Barwon Heads walking track extension 0 5 ability to manage where is that at? 1 4 Speed limits in town and coming into town 13 th Estate (60 or less to 100) Number of accidents in this area is high Housing affordability Affordability is getting harder Differing housing options Diversity Pressure to generate wealth Climate change

13 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Influence Opportunity Challenge Additional comments from Drop-In Sessions Opportunity Challenge Inundation of Barwon Heads Flooding Changes to the coast Sustainable growth Housing development No infrastructure 0 2 Coming here New growth in Ocean Grove Governance, legislation and stability We have had 6 Prime Ministers and 4 different Premiers in the past 4 years Unstable government Less government money around for things Bipartisan long-term planning and decision making We want things to last Changes in planning laws Rules keep changing Changing rules and regulations Public open space Parking 2 0 Foreshore Lungs of Melbourne Melbourne relies on four lungs surrounding it: Mornington Peninsula, 1 0 Dandenong Ranges, Mt Macedon and the Bellarine Peninsula Protecting the character of small Village Vibe community Character is the face of the community Protect the character of a small coastal 1 0 township Small park in the shopping centre which we d like to keep 12

14 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Influence Opportunity Challenge Additional comments from Drop-In Sessions Opportunity Challenge We are an island community Linking the big dots 1 0 More strategic thinking needed Population growth Population statistics need to be cautious In Barwon Heads can change the bubble may not be Changing demographics continuous Ageing population Shift in medium age to younger More children in town School experiencing significant growth Kindergarten experiencing significant growth Ageing population Trust and Confidence 1 0 Needs to be there Health and community services No doctor in town No dentist in town 1 0 Affects older members of the community Reuse old kindergarten Demarcation and boundaries Confusion over who manages and is responsible for various things VicRoads, Barwon Water, COGG Accountability Seasonal effect 1 0 Amenity in town New kindergarten could make use of Another homeware outlet space play, plant trees etc. Zones Maintain the current amenity Maintenance is needed (there is a lot of rubbish) River Parade high fire risk, trees are dying 13

15 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Influence Opportunity Challenge Additional comments from Drop-In Sessions Opportunity Challenge because they re competing with the weeds We are trying to protect the trees but some are dying e.g. West End of River Parade Moonah population is dying Bipartisan support for high levels of immigration Bipartisan support for high levels of tourism Affect on infrastructure Infrastructure Water and sewer Barwon Water What are the issues? From our perspective, we do not consider there are issues Fringe Development 13 th Beach Golf Club Was originally influenced by the Barwon Heads Real Estate Airport development The Future: Where would you put effort and funds? Working in small groups participants worked on desired strategic outcomes and potential projects in: Urban Growth Settlement and housing development Traffic, parking and movement network Natural environment and climate change Economic development, employment and town centre 14

16 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Gold group Urban growth and settlement, housing development What: Retain settlement boundary For whom: existing and future owners and users For what purpose: To protect the amenity of the village Traffic, Parking and Movement What: Bicycle and pedestrian opportunities For whom: Children and adults For What Purpose: Less cars, access to the coast, shuttle bus Natural environment and climate What: Plastic bags recycle. Protect existing natural assets, weeds For whom: Encourage interconnection between public and private Green group Settlement and housing development / urban growth What: Housing growth in the township within the current planning zones with D&D overlay and reducing the RGZ area Traffic, parking and movement network What: Bike paths, alternative transport, improved transport links with surrounding communities. Shuttle service in peak times. Second bridge crossing?? Environment What: 15 Nature public and private Preserve Ramsar wetland

17 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report How: maintain the town boundary For what purpose: preservation of the environment and tourism destination Unidentified group Traffic, parking and movement network What: Around Barwon Heads Trail For whom: All residents and visitors For what purpose: Health, recreation, alternative transport (cycling), reduced damage to environment, improved vegetation cover. Urban development What: Identify future development medium density, coastal villages character. Outside town boundary and including a possible industrial zone For whom: Existing and future residents For what purpose: Genuine long term planning, provide better affordability of living in Barwon Heads, employment Parking strategy What: More parking (old kinder site), bicycle, park and shuttle For whom: Community and tourists For what purpose: Improve mobility, parking and community amenity Unidentified group Traffic What: Focus on amenity, riding and walking For whom: Community and visitors For what purpose: Network operational plan 16

18 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Parking M/MF.VT plan Active transport policy including PBN & PPN Economic development, employment and town centre What: Thriving town centre that is contained, maintains its character and is of appropriate scale For whom: Community and visitors Projects Review and complete a streetscape plan including footpaths Urban growth, settlement and housing What: Size and scale and amenity that is sustainable and protects and respects the coastal environment For whom: Residents, visitors day and overnight, future community Projects: Sea level rise analysis (short term) and response (medium to long term) Planning controls for urban form / site coverage Infrastructure plan drainage and flooding Vegetation plan for the town public realm (draw down ground water) o Shade o Character o Bio diversity o Erosion movement o Coastal protection Pedestrian and cycling. Footpath / K&C Strategy shared zones and treatments Pink group Boundary What: Barwon Heads is unique with amazing assets. Needs to be explored. Higher density rather than expansion. Sustainable development sensitive to community needs 17

19 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Traffic management Long term plan It s a nightmare Lack of public transport 13 th Beach Road Bridge traffic another bridge? Bike paths for connectivity What: Park and ride Traffic flow and safety Pedestrians and cyclists For whom: visitors, residents and through traffic For what purpose: Safety, reduce congestion, amenity, sustainability, accessibility and health Environment and climate change Vegetation protection Bring back the brolgas Enforcement of overlays Sea level rise What: Sustainable development For whom: Barwon Heads and visitors For what purpose: No expansion to boundary Increase housing density Retain and increase the tree canopy Bike paths, walking groups Cars out of the town centre 18

20 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Yellow group Urban growth / settlement housing (fringe) Protect coastal feel by limiting growth Appropriately manage growth Natural environment is an opportunity Research on the impact of existing development on catchment and natural environment including vegetation, drainage and access What: To help frame a decision on should we have urban growth and how For whom: Existing and future residents of Barwon Heads For what purpose: To establish the risks of further development in Barwon Heads and surrounding development. Establish the tolerance for growth. Traffic parking and movement Improve road into Barwon heads Seasonal traffic management controls e.g. one way traffic on Hitchcock Avenue and 13 th Beach FRoad (would improve parking) Toll Barwon Heads road and bridge seasonally Paid parking / residential parking scheme (will encourage walking) Less permits for car parking reductions and waivers associated with town planning permits Parking outside of Barwon Heads and shuttle bus to town centre (employment) and beach More shuttle bus? P.T. linkages between towns in the area 19

21 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Output from drop in Sessions Session one: 11am to 1pm 27/10/2016 What are the issues What do you think would make a difference Infrastructure, Traffic, Movement and Community Recreation Facilities Safe cycling access to 13 th beach SLSC and beyond Revisit the previously prepared Around the Heads Trail. It is a Link cycling trail at Black Rock Road to 13 th Beach and Barwon walking and cycling recreational opportunity Heads Flinders Parade 40 kph, traffic slowing and pedestrian crossing Traffic stream through Barwon Heads passing a school is mid length potentially dangerous to non-car users. Grandview Parade 40 kph and make it one way Dedicated bike tracks for Barwon Heads especially to the school Golf Links Road (Bridge Road to Stephens Parade) 40 kph and Impact of new housing developments between Barwon Heads and footpaths (school to golf club) Geelong leading to an increase in traffic and people using the All Barwon Heads 40 kph limit town s facilities and attractions Public transport current system totally inadequate. One direction does not address connecting with O.G. or crossing the Bellarine Park and ride through to 13 th Beach and beyond Town Centre Massive congestion - cars and pedestrians A few retail outlets outside Hitchcock Avenue to direct pedestrians Developments that reflect and build on existing character of the to other areas area Get through traffic out of the Village Centre Too many cars in the Village Centre Stop rat running in Flinders Parade Keep new building design (shops) in character with existing shops Huge congestion in Hitchcock Avenue all year round. Traffic More parking diversion is required New bridge at Lakes / Staceys Road (North of Barwon Heads airport) AGREE Urgent Demographics and housing Encourage diversity of socio economic groups Maintaining the Town Boundary and stronger development Housing co-ops offering affordable housing requirements I believe it is important to retain the majority of Barwon Heads as 20

22 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report What are the issues What do you think would make a difference single storey houses with no development over two storeys in areas which may be designated for apartments (near town centre). It is very obvious the residents of Barwon heads want to retain the current character of a small town Managing growth It is inevitable that developers will keep trying to develop their preferred areas so a compromise is needed. Could 5 to 10 acre lots form a green belt on the edge of Barwon Heads? That would be preferable to 1000 normal size blocks, which the town can t absorb i.e., school, shops, parking etc. Absolutely agree - Farmer Make a decision about this area and do not revisit it every five years. It is obvious that the majority in Barwon Heads are concerned about (don t want) this area to be over developed. However we can t expect the town to stay as it is that is unrealistic so compromise is needed. The Village centre cannot support a big Barwon Heads Keep the town boundaries as they are No 3+ storey residential housing (max 7.5 metres) Natural environment A game reserve is inconsistent with environmental values of Protection of Lake Connewarre preservation and protection Reroute traffic out of Barwon Heads to reduce pressure on Climate change and sea level rise. A.8 rise seems under current environment research No more building in park land e.g. the new kinder Health mosquitos - Ross River Fever and Bairnsdale Buruli Ulcers Seal town boundary now Completion of Geelong ring road would divert a portion of our through traffic Cars to Bellarine? 21

23 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report Session 2: 5.30 pm to 7.30 pm What are the issues What do you think would make a difference Community Recreation Facilities Lack of a community arts hub. Feasibility study underway to 13 th beach road widen and make one way, cover the verges identify the best site and prepare business plan. Final report due in Restrict population to live in the small space we have Feb Look to Ocean Grove for recreational sporting facilities Extra sporting facilities i.e. Macafee land Keeping green spaces for unstructured recreation Aged care facilities i.e. Macafee land Boundaries as implied are in nature barriers Extra housing for growing family numbers. i.e. opposite Macafee area Barwon Heads cannot expect more varied shopping in a gated community Increase bike safety on 13th Beach Road Scenic bike paths i.e. along the river. Not only for serious bike Bike path to surf club and beyond racers New kindergarten has limited play space outside. There was a fabulous opportunity to create a large exciting adventurous natural play space under trees. Infrastructure, Traffic, Movement Too much traffic travelling through Barwon Heads from Ocean Locate bike paths away from roads and competing with cars Grove because it is a growth zone Priority given to duplication of Grubb Road to get traffic to Bellarine Increased volume and speed of traffic along Ewing Blyth Drive and Highway the beach Create connection between the ring road and Bellarine Highway Difficulty entering and accessing driveways as planned Risks of injury with the increase in cycling and walkers etc. along Open Golf Links Road to 13 th Beach Road as was previously E-B Drive Relocate Bridge to Geelong Road end Speed of traffic not policed especially along 13 th Beach Road and coming into town mixed with cyclists and walkers. Ewing Blyth high speeds Safety of cyclists - relocate bike paths single purpose Natural environment Protection and maintenance of existing significant Moonah population e.g. Coordinated clearing and weeding to help protect Strict control of density of development i.e. footprint and drainage the trees Extend walking paths along the river frontage 22

24 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report What are the issues What do you think would make a difference Discourage curb and channel to allow water to drain through Controls on natural environment for development natural water channel that will in turn help the Moonah population Continued protection of Moonah, Tea Tree etc. Stricter controls to protect the trees and hooded orchids (if it exists at all) in Warrenbeen Developing areas must plant trees Trees on River Parade which are dying, require an arborist assessment to try and prevent their further deterioration Protection of 54 Acres as open/further development space Retain and maintain natural vegetation Demographics Concerned that population statistics are retrospective rather than projective Better use of existing facilities and clubs and safe bike paths rather than expansion of town boundary or creeping of services in 54 Young population may drop off but focus has been on young families not older population needs Acres How can our kids hope to build in Barwon Heads with exorbitant prices/no vacant blocks left expand! Managing Growth Car parking at the beach Retain current town boundaries Beach access - too many people wetland RAMSAR, hooded plovers, marine environment being loved to death Barwon Heads is not a designated growth zone and should stay that way With subdivision in inner town area - lack of car parking within Do not extend the current town boundary buildings Conditions and bonds on planning permits to ensure vegetation Grid locked cars in summer- Bridge Road to Beach planting Residential growth zone area (with max height 10.5 m) in Barwon Heads should be reduced in size i.e. a smaller area of central town Continue to positively focus on promoting growth in target areas such as Warralilly and the 2 X large developments in Geelong and Independent planning panel C159 is contradictory in regard to restrict Town Boundary of Barwon Heads environment benefits Fill in area to 13 th Beach with residential lots with a minimum size Keeping the small town seaside feel restrict growth of say 500 square meters in controlled release (staged by 25 to 50 Where single houses are demolished and blocks subdivided this lots in each stage) 23

25 Section A: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Workshop and Drop In Sessions - Unedited Outputs Report What are the issues What do you think would make a difference needs to be looked at closely to ensure that proposed development (replacement) does not destroy or significantly change the existing character of an area, for example the removal of all vegetation followed by bulky development with no opportunity to soften with vegetation. Town Centre Limited car parking at peak tourism times (Summer and Easter) also traffic snarls Tourism traffic parking on the outlying boundaries with a shuttle bus being paid for by a small parking fee?? Crossing near roundabout bridge / Hitchcock when in use. Bike path network across and around town Gridlock on roundabout happened today and it is not even busy yet! People may not expect a park in the main street like lots of towns and walk a little further Need stop/give way sign corner of Clifford Parade and Grove Road - desperate as people drive straight through from Clifford Parade and cars parked right up to corner Enforce existing restrictions Car parking at the rear of shops Compulsory acquisition of some homes for car parking? 24

26 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update 25

27 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) ED SUBMISSIONS Submission 1 I am writing to make a submission regarding possible planning controls within Warrenbeen Court, Barwon Heads. We own, and are resident at lot 6 7 Warrenbeen Court. Our property is under 0.4 ha. We bought the property last year for over $1.3M. It represents a very significant investment for us; I will spend most of my working life paying it off. I believe that an environmental significance overlay would be very detrimental to the value of the property. I could obtain professional advice from a valuer if required. We do not intend subdivision or major extension but if I was unwell we would have to sell, also as we age at some point it is likely we would sell. 26 Our property is heavily treed. Native vegetation is well preserved. We bought in the Warrenbeen area after living on Sheepwash road for 6 years, largely because of the natural environment and the large allotments. We have planted endemic species and retained understory vegetation. I worry that there is now a perverse reward for landowners who have not retained natural vegetation on their property, or who clear land prior to controls being formalised. If we wished to extend, or put in a pool (we may wish to put in a pool in the future, and would probably need to remove 1 tree in order to do that) then our options as far as planting additional trees to make up for any removed would be very limited. Should I take out a few trees now? This has occurred on Saratoga Ave in a property which was included in the recent vegetation assessment. There is also a risk of creating a very complex two tiered process regards to planning, prior to Dec 2020 covenant expiry. We are currently attempting to build a garage. The planning process has been very long and costly. An additional layer of complexity would create more uncertainty. In summary: 1. I object to an environmental significance overlay, and believe it would be very detrimental to property values and create unnecessary complexity and expense. 2. If additional controls are created, consideration needs to be given to how this will function in the period between now and Dec The current situation is very nuanced, council position is not well expressed. A two tiered situation would be very difficult to navigate. 3. Significant vegetation in other areas should also be afforded protection eg. Saratoga, Carr St, Stephens Parade. There may be existing overlays on Stephens Parade. 4. Consideration should be given to revegetation in public spaces such as the reserve at the western end of Warrenbeen court, and the reserve adjoining Newbay Close. There may be flood containment issues, but this needs to be explored. Please consider the above. 2 This written submission is made on behalf of the landowners of Stage C of 13th Beach Resort located at Barwon Heads Road, Connewarre which forms part of the 13th Beach Resort. The submission is made to the Greater Geelong City Council proposal to refresh the Barwon Heads Structure Plan. This submission primarily concerns Council s proposed thinking to rezone Stage C of the 13th Beach Resort from Comprehensive Development Zone (CDZ) to Farming Zone (FZ). First and foremost, it is our submission that the land contained within Stage C remains within the CDZ. As background, Stage B of 13th Beach Resort was approved via Amendment C054 to the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme on 21 June 2007 at the recommendation of an Independent Panel. Council s submission to the Panel at the time covered the importance of the Resort to tourism and the local economy of the Barwon Heads township. The existing controls are stringent enough to achieve Council s vision At present, the approved Comprehensive Development Plan (amended September 2006) specifies that no development or building to be used as accommodation or commercial purpose must be located within Stage C. This control is deemed a sufficient measure by which to ensure appropriate development is undertaken on the land which integrates with the existing Stage A and Stage B and which meets the objectives of the zone to encourage the resort and tourism in the locality. Council s proposal to rezone the site to Farming Zone will jeopardise the strategic vision for the site In the long term planning vision for 13th Beach Resort, the intention for a wellness centre and a child care centre to complement the overall resort, are key attributes. These would be made accessible to the public as well as 13th Beach resort residents and golfers/tourists. Such a resort located within Stage C would ensure it is easily accessible from the clubhouse and existing residences and accommodation and will complete the offer at the resort. Under the proposed Farming Zone, Clause Table of Uses would prohibit the ability to achieve this outcome for the community. Some years ago, an application was submitted to Council for these uses; however at that time the market was not strong enough to support this. It was made very clear by the Barwon Heads community at the recent workshop that an additional childcare centre was a much desired facility within the area. A statement from Council s Family Services Department at the workshop revealed that it was unfeasible for Council to provide such a service at this time. It would be logical for Council to maintain the current zoning for 13th Beach Resort Stage C in order to increase the opportunity for such a facility to be provided privately, as well as complete the range of services that complement the resort facilities. The application of the Farming Zone is inappropriate in this case Further, application of the Farming Zone in particular is highly restrictive and inappropriate. This is best captured within the purpose of Clause Farming Zone which states: To provide for the use of land for agriculture. To encourage the retention of productive agricultural land. To ensure that non-agricultural uses, including dwellings, do not adversely affect the use of land for agriculture. To encourage the retention of employment and population to support rural communities. To encourage use and development of land based on comprehensive and sustainable land management practices and infrastructure provision. Contrary to Council s past position on the 13th Beach Resort, as demonstrated within the previous Panel Report for Amendment C054, the Farming Zone will eliminate any ability for the golf course tourism use to continue within the land designated as Stage C. Council has a long-standing history of supporting tourism / recreation. The proposal to rezone the land does not comply with PPN42

28 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission Planning Practice Note 42: Applying the Rural Zones states that: The Farming Zone is primarily concerned with keeping land in agricultural production and avoiding land uses that could limit future farming or constrain agricultural activities. In this zone: - Farming is the dominant land use and all other land uses are subordinate to farming -..Non-farm dwellings and land uses not related to farming may be considered but should not limit the operation and expansion of agricultural land uses. - Farm-related tourism and retailing uses may be considered A golf course resort is not deemed a farm-related tourism activity. It uses the whole of the land for non-agricultural land uses. In reaching a decision on a proposal in this zone, the responsible authority must give significant weight to the farming productivity of the land and the relevance of the proposal to farming rather than its use as an unproductive buffer to residential use. In addition, Council s local planning policy at Clause Tourism Development in Rural Areas similarly prioritises agricultural development over tourism land uses which further exacerbate the issue. Not an evidence based proposal The proposal to rezone Stage C is not supported by any background study, review or report which specifically states that additional agricultural land is in demand at Barwon Heads. PPN42 clearly identifies the need for any proposal to apply the Farming Zone to be sufficiently supported by strategic policy and research. It is therefore unclear why Council has proposed this rezoning, other than to prohibit long term development of identified Stage C of the 13th Beach Resort. The most recent rural study commissioned by the City of Greater Geelong was the Rural Land Use Strategy (adopted May 2007). The Study recommended a number of rezonings including rezoning land within rural areas to Farming Zone. The subject site was not mentioned within this review and remained within the CDZ. Following this, Managing Development in Rural Areas - Planning Policy Review was prepared in September 2015 which recommended a number of changes to the Local Planning Policy Framework of the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme in order to manage non-agricultural discretionary uses (other than tourism) that were added through Amendment VC103 in This Review specifically identifies several future accommodation estimates for the Tourism Profile. It is noted within the Review that key aspects of the tourism profile for Greater Geelong include some major tourism uses are located within rural areas, both not in a farming or rural conservation zone this includes Thirteenth Beach Golf Course (CDZ1). The location of the Resort within a rural area which is not a designated Farming Zone is an explicit feature of tourism in the municipality. Furthermore, the Review specifies a need for at least one (1) additional Integrated Resort facility and one (1) additional Golf Course facility similar to the 13th Beach Golf Resort in the Geelong region. Indeed, the Resort is effectively held up as an example of the types of development Council would like duplicated within the municipality. This is a testament to the high quality of the 13th Beach Resort and its continued role within the Barwon Heads and wider tourist economy. Given the above, it is unclear why Council would propose that the site be included within the Farming Zone which would undoubtedly prevent any further development of this contiguous land holding and jeopardise the long-term strategic vision for the site, thus removing opportunity for further economic and tourism stimulus within the Barwon Heads township and wider municipality. 13th Beach Stage C should not become a buffer zone As it currently stands, the Barwon Heads township has a definitive north-south boundary which restricts growth any further west. Between this boundary and the designated RAMSAR Wetland is a tract of Farming Zone land which acts as an essential buffer between the two land uses. It is a concern of our client s that Council (having provided no other reasoning) may be seeking to expand the township boundary closer to the RAMSAR site (as per feedback form questions), and use Stage C as a Farming Zone buffer. This is inappropriate and is not supported. A Structure Plan update should not incorporate a rezoning proposal It is unfathomable that Council claim to propose a seemingly simple update to the Barwon Heads Structure Plan 2010 but instead propose to rezone land within the boundary of the Structure Plan area. Rezoning requests require a Planning Scheme Amendment and a significant level of background technical documentation in order to provide an appropriate level of justification. Council has provided no background documentation or further information to support the proposal to rezone Stage C. Stage C does not constitute productive agricultural land As stated within PPN42, as well as Clause Farming Zone, the purpose of the proposed zone is to encourage the retention of productive agricultural land. It is argued that the land within Stage C, although utilised for adjustment grazing purposes only currently, is not State significant or regionally significant agricultural land. Furthermore, the Corangamite Regional Catchment Strategy identifies Barwon Heads as an area of lower relative agricultural productivity than other important areas of the City of Greater Geelong. The aforementioned Rural Land Use Strategy (2007) relied upon information contained within the previous regional catchment strategy for the Corangamite Catchment ( ) when it was determined to rezone land in the north of the Greater Geelong municipality. It can therefore be said that that land contained within Stage C has not, since 2003, been identified as productive agricultural land which merits rezoning to the Farming Zone. We trust Council will take our clients concerns into consideration in any further iteration of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan. 3 The Barwon Heads Arts Council, established in 2013, has over 350 members and runs workshops and events during the year. We have just organised a highly successful 2016 Bellarine Arts Trail that saw thousands of visits to 19 venues with 38 artists in Ocean Grove and Barwon Heads. This year we have been undertaking a COGG funded Feasibility Study (in 2 stages) to determine the viability of a Community Arts Hub for Barwon Heads. Barwon Heads is an arts town but has no dedicated arts facilities. Stage 1 of the Feasibility Study (July 2016) undertook a Needs Assessment and is attached here. Stage 1 concluded there is sufficient community need to undertake Stage 2 site options analysis and development of a Business Plan. The Consultant's Brief for Stage 2 is also attached here. We are currently choosing a consultant to undertake Stage 2 that will look at potential sites and prepare a business plan. The final report will be available in February 2017, well within the time frame of your Structure Plan review. There is scope within the Barwon Heads Structure Plan review to consider whether the current community facilities and offerings meet the future requirements of the community. Community surveys and consultation undertaken during Stage 1 indicate that there is a strong demand for more arts related facilities/activities in Barwon Heads. I would be happy to meet with you to discuss this submission in further detail. 27

29 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission 4 I refer to the current process to review the Barwon Heads Structure Plan and this submission is made on behalf of Mr Ben Collins, owner of the property at Lings Rd, Connewarre (subject land). The subject land is located within the study area for the structure plan review and is located on the east side of Lings Rd. The land consists of one title with two parcels and contains an existing dwelling located to the southern end of the site. The subject land is zoned Farming Zone with no overlays. The land is surrounded by the Comprehensive Development Zone Schedule 1 (CDZ1), associated with the 13th Beach Golf Course and Residential development, to the north, east and west. The land abuts the Lake Connewarre State Game Reserve and Murtnaghurt Lagoon the south. The owners of the subject land support the overall review of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan and are particularly interested in the opportunities for the subject land noting the important rural and scenic setting of land at the western entry to Barwon Heads. A key question raised in the current consultation asks whether there is support for the back zoning of the 13th Beach Golf Course Stage C CDZ1 on the east side of Lings Rd to Farming Zone. The Tourism Development Strategy referred to in the Issue Papers indicates a strong tourism focus for the Bellarine and Barwon Heads in particular. In this context, the ability for extension to the 13th Beach Golf Course development into the future via the CDZ1 zoning is considered a reasonable opportunity to maintain (noting this would be focused on a golf course only and not include residential). In terms of the subject land it is considered the location and nature of the site provide for positive tourism based opportunities to be explored on the land. It is noted the current Farming Zone allows for a range of uses associated with tourism based development to occur subject to permits. It is also noted that Council has recently adopted Amendment C347 (via the Council meeting on 25 October 2016) which seeks to define policy in the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme about non-rural uses in Farming and Rural Conservation zoned land. Proposed Clause Tourism, Accommodation and Function Centre Development in Rural Areas seeks to balance ongoing agricultural activity with supporting non-rural uses that positively contribute to tourist and employment growth that have minimal impact on rural landscape character. It is noted the adopted policy suggests that tourism accommodation uses and function centres should be associated with agriculture but may not have that association if the following criteria are met: It is demonstrated that the circumstances of the use are unique and support site selection in a rural location over an urban location. The site is strategically located with respect to an identified tourist route, such as the tourist route identified in the Bellarine Peninsula Localised Planning Statement or along the Bellarine Highway. Preference will be given to areas where there is already a cluster of non-rural activities and additional development will not result in urbanisation. The use and its associated development would not unreasonably visually compromise a non-urban break between settlements, a significant view or area identified for landscape significance or environmental significance. The use can address a regionally recognised demand identified in a tourism development strategy The subject land can respond to the above criteria as: It is located adjacent to the identified tourist route of Barwon Heads Rd as indicated in the Bellarine Peninsula Localised Planning Statement. It is surrounded on three sides by development and zoning associated with the 13th Beach Golf Course development. It has proximity to and connection with the 13th Beach Golf Course development, natural assets of the wetlands to the south and east, the coast and the township of Barwon Heads. Any future development could respond to the landscape setting. It can respond to the identified need for nature based accommodation and tourism uses linked to agriculture for the Bellarine South area identified in the Tourism Greater Geelong and the Bellarine Tourism Development Strategy January The owners of the subject land are currently exploring opportunities for a restaurant based use on the land associated with local produce and potentially connected to agricultural activity on the land however opportunities for other uses, including hosting functions and accommodation, may also develop. The Barwon Heads Structure Plan review provides an opportunity to recognise the tourism potential of the land, linked to a broader regional tourism setting, as a policy position localised to the Barwon Heads context. It is also suggested that in the event the current CDZ1 on the east side of Lings Rd was to be back zoned that similar reference to tourism opportunities could also be recognised on that site in combination with the subject land through the Structure Plan. Rural based tourism development on the subject land would be further supported by the concept of the Round the Heads Trail, the feasibility of which was undertaken in Whilst it is noted there are significant actions required to deliver the trail (as identified in the Issues Paper) such a trail would provide significant benefit to the township of Barwon Heads and support the development of tourism opportunities in the hinterland that are respectful of the landscape and environmental setting. In the event the structure plan process proposed broader changes to the settlement boundary of Barwon Heads the owners of the subject land reserve the right to explore alternative opportunities that may be relevant to their land in that context. Summary In summary, the owners of the land at Lings Rd are supportive of the review of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan and seek recognition of the tourism opportunities on their land within any updated structure plan consistent with the principles and policy in the recently adopted Amendment C347. The owners of the subject land also support further development of the Round the Heads Trail to enhance the tourism offer in the rural hinterland of Barwon Heads and also provide a passive recreation link between the hinterland and the township of Barwon Heads. 5 My main response to the structure plan review is as follows. 1. I support the vision statement in the Bellarine Strategic Plan which will see Barwon Heads continue to be a relaxed non urbanised coastal town which maintains a sense of place and protects its heritage values. 2. This vision will ensure that Barwon Heads remains a popular holiday and tourist destination which sustains the local economy. 3. Because of the precedent that would be set I do not support a change to the western boundary. Barwon Heads is not a designated growth area. 4. I support stronger building controls to stop very large houses being built with little or no landscaping required. 5. Regulations such as RGZ should not be taken as one size fits all. These regulations need to be changed and adapted to better guide sustainable development in Barwon Heads. 6. Our existing native vegetation needs to be protected with a wider application of vegetation overlays. 7. Medium density development in Barwon Heads needs to be better managed to preserve the character and value of the town MANAGING GROWTH

30 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission Growth should be managed in consultation with the existing residents taking into account: maintenance of Barwon Heads characters, old and evolving, in preservation of the natural environment whilst improving the efficiency of the infrastructure. 29 Housing development should allow for a diversity of demographics including affordable housing options for low socio-economic people. There are several housing cooperatives in Barwon Heads and this should be encouraged. TOWN CENTRE The existing character should be maintained with a determined effort to keep cars out of the main street via parking restriction and other methods. The case for a restricted zone around the town centre is clear with only vehicles belonging to people who work or reside in the town being allowed to park. Facilities for visitors to leave your car at the boundary and hire a bike and ride into the town should be provided. Heavy vehicles should be banned from driving though the town unless they have a valid reason. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The Barwon Heads natural environment is unique and needs to have total protection into the future. It is the sacred land of the Aboriginal Wathaurong people and we are morally and ethically called to respect this and work with the indigenous people. It contains an internationally significant Ramsar wetland and other interconnecting, sensitive land, river and marine eco-systems. To live within this is a privilege! More research needs to be carried out to gain further knowledge of its unique character and how we are to preserve and promote its growth. To extend the residential boundary of the town would be inappropriate and work against preserving this pristine natural environment. INFASTRUCTURE - Access and Movement: Traffic flow through the town is alarming and in excess particularly during the summer period. There needs to be a proper solution to traffic because at present pedestrians are at risk particularly around the school area. Further, there is little infrastructure that support safe bike riding. The little organisation of some bike paths in Barwon Heads such as the totem route through the town to the school and the tracks along the river and beach are not sufficient in catering for the rising numbers of bike riders. Many families with very young children ride together as well as slightly older children on the way to school on the footpath along Sheepwash road. This is a major thorough-fare during peak times in the morning and late afternoon. The choice, albeit illegal, to ride on the footpath is the safer one as I have been twice forced off the road whilst riding. This is unacceptable and I have seen many near misses involving children and cars. This needs immediate action to avoid a fatality. Bus services on have insufficient frequency generally but most particularly in two instances. Firstly on weekends, especially Sundays and secondly in the early morning going towards Ocean Grove. There is no opportunity for me to get work in the several Aged care facilities in Ocean Grove on a morning shift, any day. 7 1 Structure Plan Timeline: reviews seem to come upon our communities far too frequently and lead to either an ad hoc approach to important planning decisions or a rehash of old largely ignored aspirations. Glossy booklets, pamphlets, newsletters, s, public notices, and community campaigns in response to perceived threats all place largely unnecessary stress upon communities. Structure Plans should have a longer and more authoritative used-by-date. 2 Western Boundary: as Barwon Heads is not considered a growth area an extension to the western boundary would be a departure to state government planning. In considering the possible benefits of land release with the threats to near by Ramsar Wetlands the balance should be in favour of the natural environment. The existing growth corridors are adequate for the projected population increase. 3 The Bellarine Strategic Plan ( ) contains a 'vision' which is still relevant and supported by the Barwon Heads community. This vision will ensure that the state protects its coastal tourist and holiday areas for future generations to enjoy. 4 RGZ: the regulations have been imposed upon Barwon Heads without thought as to the coastal context and vision statement of earlier documents. They have resulted in housing whose footprint is destroying the natural ambience of the town. Guidelines for medium density need to be adapted and nuanced for different contexts. It should not be the case that one size fits all. Allowing the sub-division of blocks and encouraging a significant increase in house sizes has the immediate effect of vastly increasing the value of the land and shutting many out of the Barwon Heads market. 5. Increase in vegetation overlays: to ensure that Barwon Heads keep its remnant native vegetation healthy more attention needs to be paid to extending vegetation protection. This supports local habitat, softens new development and creates valuable shade. 6 Stronger building controls: needed to stop the moon-scaling of blocks of land and building to the boundary with no gardens or even backyards. More and more children are playing in the streets because they do not have backyards. 7 Heritage values: to ensure that Barwon Heads keeps its non-urbanised coastal feel heritage values need to be acknowledged and protected. A sense of place relies on its heritage and history- all value-adding to the holiday and tourist experience. 8 In reviewing the Barwon Heads Structure Plan (2010) I urge the council planners to take into account the following issues. Support for the vision statement set out in Bellarine Strategic Plan ( ) The statement remains relevant. The council has a responsibility to implement the intent of the plan by completing the works described. This is the basis of building trust between the community and council. The community has been invited to participate in the review, the community needs confidence in the process. In the year 2016 Barwon Heads will be a unique, sustainable, residential and environmental hub; a landlocked community surrounded by pristine river, coast and wetlands. An intimate community which supports all age groups and provides a place of belonging for residents and visitors alike; where human impact is managed to support the fragile natural surroundings by: Clearly defined limitations on urban development Protecting and nurturing natural surroundings by managing human footprint Supporting walking, cycling, fishing, sailing, surfing, swimming and generally enjoying what our coastal village has to offer in an environmentally sensitive way. No change to the western boundary. Why would the pecuniary interests of a few landowners be given more clout than the future protection and enhancement of the Connewarre Wetlands and the benefits that would accrue to the future generations of Victorians? The need for developing the farmland into housing estates has not been made. There is a 21 year supply of affordable housing lots in the Geelong area.

31 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission RGZ regulations are not appropriate and need to be adapted to better guide sustainable development in Barwon Heads. Limit the RGZ in Barwon Heads township to 100m of the designated activity centre. Provide planning and building controls that enhance the character of the town. Proper vegetation overlays need to be extended to protect existing native vegetation. Complete a vegetation and environmental assessment of the town ship and then implement the recommendations effectively. Support for stronger building controls. Complete a thorough heritage assessment of the town ship. The absence of 9 Bridge Rd house from heritage protection results din a planning permit application to demolition. Maintain the relaxed non-urbanised coastal feel of Barwon Heads that will continue to grow tourism while protecting heritage values. 9 Thank you for the opportunity to attend the meeting last Thursday. We appreciated it. I would like to add the suggestion that now is the ideal time for IGA and other businesses to become plastic bag free. This also includes the biodegradable plastic bags- they just disintegrate enter the ocean and food chain faster. Anglesea and Torquay are plastic bag free- Barwon Heads and Ocean Grove can take their lead from them. Can you please add this to the list of what we would like to see? 10 I am very concerned about the safety of walking along Carr st to go to town, l walk it at least 2 to 3 times a week l have been forced to run out of the way of buses who travel to fast and to close to where people walk. Surely the road could be widen to accommodate walkers and bikes. or a footpath you recently put in new bus stops surely the road could be widen so people would be a lot safer l invite you to meet with me to show you how dangerous this is. 11 Herewith my Submission for the Barwon Heads Strategic Planning Review Taits Road, Barwon Heads. Currently Farming Zone History in Brief My sister Pamela Hutchins and I are Tenants in Common of the above property which we inherited from our parents 21 years ago. The property was bought by my parents in January 1968, the month I was married. Our families have enjoyed 'the farm' since then with cattle, ponies, a tennis court and lots of other interesting and fun activities. Pamela and I signed an Agreement, drawn up by her then husband and lawyer Peter Hutchins, in 1995 which gave us each sole responsibility and exclusive use of different parts of 'The Farm', namely Pampas Farm and Melaleuca, ( see attached Agreement)). Pamela got the house and I got a bit more land. About 'The Farm'. The Farm is approximately 19.2 hectares of mostly grazing land with one dwelling and 2 outbuildings. It has a beautiful and well preserved collection of very old Moonah trees. I battle to control the rabbits, boxthorn and other undergrowth that provides harbour for these pests, a fire hazard and threatens the lovely old Moonahs. I have spent in excess of $ the last 18 months on this project, including fencing. I planted 100 new Moonahs in 2015 and kept them watered over summer, (also at considerable expense because we live in Sydney) about half of which have survived (which I am told is typical). We have a local Farmer who grazes cows and calves on the property and we will agist a couple of ponies belonging to local girls. Our end of Taits Road is a very popular walking, dog walking and cycling route which joins the Council land on the embankment west of Jirrahlinga, with access to the Barwon River at the Sheepwash. The Future I am fast approaching 70 years of age and am concerned about succession planning. My first priority is to get separate Titles for Pampas Farm and Melaleuca in accordance with the division described in the attached 21 year old Agreement. It is not my intention, at this stage, to further develop the property. In view of the current Strategic Planning Review being undertaken by Council it is timely to consider the options. Options. My preferred outcome from the Review, in order of preference are; 1. To Rezone from Farm to Residential. Although I have no plan to develop, this gives my family the most flexibility for the future. 2. To Rezone as Low Density Residential, (minimum 1 acre lots) which gives us a little less flexibility 3. To Rezone as Rural Living (minimum 1 hectare lots). 4. To get an exemption from the 30 hectare minimum for Farms and get maybe minimum 5 hectare lots and keep the Farm Zoning. 5. To get an exemption from the 30 hectare minimum for Farms and divide the property into 2 farms, according to The Agreement. This would provide a win/win both for me and the anti development groups in Barwon Heads, as the property would remain much as it is. My family and I would continue to undertake the expensive protection of the Moonah Trees and rural environment. 6. To Rezone as Special Use similar to Yellow Gums in Ocean Grove, or Warrenbeen in Barwon Heads. 8. To not change anything. This would result in a dispute between Pamela and I. My legal advice is that would result in a hearing with VCAT. The probable outcome would be a forced public auction of the whole of the farm. I do not think my sister or I could match the likely bids from Developers who I am sure would not look after the Moonahs or rural ambience as I do. I see this option as a Lose/Lose result. Government Perspective It seems to me that Government (State and Local) is concerned about 1. Sustainability. I can assure you there is nothing sustainable about a 19 (or for that matter a 30) hectare property. As alluded to above, maintaining the farm takes a lot of money and effort, the agistment fees we receive do not cover the Council rates. Perhaps by sustainable, Government means it is trying to gain more income through high density development and increased income from rates. 2. Protecting the rural ambience of the area including the old Moonah trees. I think I am doing a pretty good job at that, probably better than anyone else and at my own expense. The Anti Development Lobby. The feeling I get about these groups is very much a 'get in the loft and pull up the ladder' approach, which I think is a very selfish view. I think Options 1, 2 or 3 would be much fairer and 2, 3 or 4 would meet their concerns about the environment. In terms of overburdening local resources and infrastructure e.g. shops and parking, there are several large shopping Centres within 15 minutes of Barwon Heads with regular bus services. Limited parking would effectively control the number of people using Hastings Street, if that is what they want. Traffic through Barwon Heads and beyond could be diverted along Golf Links Road. If necessary the roundabouts could be changed to traffic lights, but we have not experienced significant traffic delays since the bridge was upgraded and do not think it is warranted at this stage. From my discussions with residents it seems it is rare to have to walk more than 200 metres to shops or to wait more than 10 minutes to drive across the bridge. The GGCC Strategic Planning Review So Far. I attended all meetings on October 26th and 27th this year, much of which made me very uncomfortable. My main concerns were 30

32 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission 1. Being asked to make judgements on the character of houses in the town with no value given to the eclectic nature of the houses and the individual rights of the owners. 2. The assumption that only small residential lots or existing farms would be available. There was no consideration of the possibility of small properties offering a variety of lifestyle options e.g. room for a tennis court, big gardens with lots of lawn, ponies, space to kick a football, play cricket or just enjoy a pleasant uncluttered ambience. In Conclusion Pampas Farm and Melaleuca are unique because of their environment, the 21year old Legal Agreement and their proximity to the Town and the Lake Connewarre State Game Reserve lands. They therefore warrant special consideration. I hope these comments are helpful and look forward to hearing of and contributing to the Review Issues as they evolve. 12 Thankyou for considering my submission for the planning for the future of Barwon Heads. I have been coming to Barwon Heads all my life, and I love the town. My family have owned our property for fifty years, and I love every hectare of that too. The structure plan workshop I attended showed the strength of community feeling, and the conflicting hopes the community has for the town s future. In the morning people were very clearly saying they want houses to be small on their blocks, and have plenty of native vegetation around them. In the afternoon, certain people took control and were advocating three storey buildings in the township! 31 Background 1. The subject property has been in my family since It was left to my sister, Jenny Hall, and I in 1995, and we now own it as equal Tenants in Common. 2. The rezoning and development of land between our Eastern Boundary and Sheepwash Rd. has meant that we have 26 houses on our Eastern boundary. We were not consulted about this development at all. 3. For the last ten years we have agisted cattle on our property, an arrangement that is cooperative but does not even pay the rates. Reference to the submission re The Barwon Heads Structure plan of my sister Jenny Hall. I was not consulted at all about Jenny s submission, and disagree with her reference to council re our private agreement. This agreement was drawn up over twenty years ago, and was simply intended to provide a clear and convenient way for two owners to manage one property. As tenants in common, any changes to property ownership must be by mutual agreement. If there were to be a subdivision of the property into two, the appropriate process would be a proper survey and valuation, and an equal division on current values. Apart from that, we are in agreement on most points. 1. My family has cared for the property for fifty years, and wish to continue doing so for as long as is reasonably possible. We are both approaching 70 years of age, and hope to continue to manage the property for the next ten to fifteen years. 2. When we are no longer able to do that, the property will need to be divided in some way for the next generation, or sold. 3. If the community wants to maintain the rural feel to the area, some flexibility with sub-division for our property will enable our families to stay there, continuing the care of the land that our history has proven. If the property is sold, it will almost certainly be to developers. 4. Having co-existed with our 26 neighbours for the last ten or fifteen years, we have a fairly unique experience of the difficulties, pressures and responsibilities this juxtaposition causes. Amongst the problems we must manage are trespassing, rubbish being dumped on our property, cattle fences being cut, the risk of fire to the neighbouring houses (we comply with all fire mitigation orders), and the risk of large branches from our trees (planted before there were any houses there) falling on these houses. Most of these houses have cut down the fences on our boundary to take advantage of the view over our paddocks, and some have gates onto our property. We have therefore had to have a second line of fencing (electrified) on our land to contain the cattle. Managing these problems is time-consuming, difficult, very expensive, and at times very worrying, particularly at times of high wind. I feel the council should take some responsibility for this situation, since we were not consulted at all about the next-door development. The way that the current residential zoning finishes so abruptly at our boundary, clearly indicates that council s intention was originally to extend the boundary to the end of Taits Rd, which is the natural boundary to the township. Some years ago we enquired about joining the mains sewer system, and it was suggested we wait for future development, giving us the expectation that this would occur when the time was right. REZONING NOW would give us time to plan, to work with council, and to come to terms with whatever changes are to occur so that the optimal result can be achieved. I understand employment opportunities in Geelong are good, so that population growth pressures are going to continue. The suggestion that allowing three storey development in the centre of Barwon Heads will satisfy this need is ludicrous. It will barely increase accommodation, but will ruin the ambience of the town, in exactly the way the community, via the Barwon Heads Structure Plan workshop I attended last week, strongly stated it did not want. Submission 1. Logically COGG should consider rezoning our farm to For Future Residential or Residential. This would allow eventual development to the end of Taits Rd. beyond which is a flood levee/ reserve (this used to be the old town tip so it has proven itself to be a very resilient area)). This would be a sensible extension as it does not abut other property(s), and cause the problems detailed in 4. above. 2. It would seem the last rezoning to our Eastern boundary was an interim step at the time as the sharp demarcation between rural and residential does not make long term sense. 3. The Wetlands would not be impacted at all. 4. If rezoning is not possible, Council may consider reviewing our unique situation to allow us to plan for the future. Sub-division into two lots along lines to be mutually agreed by myself and my sister is one possibility, or being allowed to build two dwellings is another. 5. It makes more sense to allow controlled land development for the growth of Barwon Heads, rather than opting for multi storey developments which would severely impact the character of the town, with little long term benefit. Three storied buildings in Barwon Heads is the worst possible outcome for the community, as it will look like a suburb in the CITY. 6. Given community concerns, it would make sense to phase the rezoning over time. The next strategic review should be scheduled for ten years time, with an interim review as appropriate. Development has been so rapid in recent times that the option for another review must remain open. COGG members are welcome to visit the farm and see first hand the problems of managing the interface between rural and residential. 13 Tract Consultants on behalf of Macafee Investments is pleased to lodge this submission to the current review of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan. Tract has requested a review of settlement boundary and has provided strategic justification to an adjustment to the current settlement boundary which is currently in the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme. 1 INTRODUCTION

33 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission Tract Consultants on behalf of Macafee Investments lodges this submission to the Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update (2016). Macafee Investments own the land at Geelong Road, Barwon Heads (subject land) and the land is largely undeveloped. Barwon Heads is a popular coastal town located on the Bellarine Peninsula and increasingly attracting more permanent residents. Barwon Heads, however, has limited land supply and there is increasing opportunities for diverse housing options in the town. Located on the western entrance to Barwon Heads, the subject land is well suited for well designed, sustainable residential development. Furthermore, low-scale development will enable the delivery of increase community infrastructure and landscaping, including sporting ovals and pedestrian connections. Preservation of the natural environment will be a key design outcome for future development which will not extend beyond the Murtnaghurt Lagoon channel to the west. This submission seeks to include the land at Geelong Road within the future settlement boundary of Barwon Heads for the following reasons: That Murtnaghurt Lagoon, as an environmental asset, is the logical settlement boundary of Barwon Heads; That the proposed scale of dwellings (staged delivery) will not significantly impact on the character and amenity of Barwon Heads; Ability to increase community facilities including open spaces, pedestrian linkages to Barwon Heads and possibly to Thirteen Beach Surf Club; and To increase housing options and land supply in Barwon Heads. 2 BACKGROUND 2.1 Subject Land Macafee Investments own the land at Barwon Heads Road, Barwon Heads. The 51 ha land is located on the southern side of Barwon Heads Road and currently zoned Farming Zone in the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme. Part of the land is affected by overlay controls. The land to the east is zoned Schedule 2 to the General Residential Zone (GRZ2), to the north Road Zone Category 1 (RDZ1), Public Conservation and Resource Zone (PCRZ) to the west and Rural Conservation Zone (RCZ) to the south. Subject Land Planning History The Barwon Heads Structure Plan (1996) was the initial strategic plan which identified the preferred character and settlement framework for Barwon Heads. In 2007, the City of Greater Geelong reviewed its Structure Plan which was adopted by Council and subsequently introduced by Amendment C159 to the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme. Amendment C159 implemented the findings of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan (2007). The 2007 Structure Plan was subject to a number of iterations which the subject land was included in the Draft Structure Plan (as adopted by Council in July 2007) and subsequently revised to exclude the Macafee from exhibited Amendment C159. A panel considered the submissions to C159 and the Panel believes that limited development of this land [Macafee land] is feasible and could be supported if it provided a net environmental benefit for the Murtnaghurt Lagoon and channel. The Panel does not agree that the limited development of this land need have a negative impact on the aspiration to retain a village character for Barwon Heads. For these reasons, Council is encouraged to further consider potential environmental improvements that might result of the development of this land, and if appropriate, to prepare a suitable planning scheme amendment. The current review of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan provides an opportunity to revisit the comments from the C159 Panel and also change in circumstances since Proposal It is proposed to partially develop the land for residential development. The balance of the land will be used for community infrastructure (oval) and pedestrian and cycling trails. There will be a strong focus on environmental rehabilitation, particularly with the interface along the Murtnaghurt Lagoon channel. Most of the existing vegetation will be retain and additional landscaping with enhance the western entrance to Barwon Heads. The proposed development will be around dwellings and the design would be managed though strict design provisions will would result in high quality, non-uniform and sustainable design outcomes which would continue to address the coastal character of Barwon Heads. 3 SETTLEMENT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT 3.1 Strategic Justification for Adjusting the Settlement Boundary Land Supply & Affordability Clause Urban Growth in the Strategic Planning Policy Framework (SPPF) aims to ensure there is a sufficient supply of land available for residential, commercial, retail, industrial, recreation, institutional and other community uses. Barwon Heads is a desirable plan to live and housing supply is limited. The Council states that there is 4 years of supply based on the current demand. The reality is Barwon Heads has limited land supply available at present. According to

34 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission the Residential Land Supply Monitoring Project G21 Region (Geelong) (June 2015), it was reported that Barwon Heads very low supply which provides limited opportunities for current and new residents and also places increased pressure on affordability. A consequence of the lack of land supply is increased densities in the established areas. Barwon Heads, similar to other coastal communities, has a high vacancy dwelling rate (33%). Whilst the vacancy rates are declining, many people still retain holiday homes. Increasing the availability of land will provide an injection of new housing types, improved design, jobs and investments Coastal settlement policy support Clause Coastal Settlement aims to plan for sustainable coastal development. The inclusion of Barwon Heads Road will not contribute to linear urban sprawl or ribbon development. The western boundary will be defined by Murtnaghurt Lagoon channel. The subject land is not low-lying, on a ridgeline or located in a primary dune system. The suggested change to the settlement boundary will respect landscape values and key view corridors. Clause Geelong (G21) regional growth implements the G21 Region Plan. Barwon Heads is defined as either as a District Town or Town in the G21 Regional Growth Plan. Barwon Heads is not identified for growth. The proposed shift in the settlement boundary will not generate growth at the same scale as Ocean Grove, Leopold, Armstrong Creek and Torquay. The G21 Plan acknowledges that there will be limited growth of Barwon Heads. The proposal to modify the settlement boundary proposes limited growth of approximately dwellings staged over an extended period. Clause Coastal Areas ensures that development is sensitively sited and designed and respects the character of coastal settlements. Furthermore, Clause ensures that natural landscapes are protected and new development does not detract from their natural quality. The development of the land at Barwon Heads Road can be developed in accordance with the Victorian Coastal Strategy 2014 principles Barwon Heads Future Development Opportunities Clause Barwon Heads provides the strategic framework for future development of Barwon Heads in the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme. This policy aims to: Protect and enhance the rural and coastal environment on the Bellarine Peninsula and maintain nonurban breaks between settlements; Facilitate the development of Ocean Grove, Drysdale/Clifton Springs and Leopold as hubs of development and service provision on the Bellarine Peninsula. In all other townships on the Bellarine Peninsula provide retail, commercial and community uses and facilities that serve the daily needs of the community and encourage street based activity. Provide for sustainable industrial, commercial, retail, agricultural and tourism development in designated locations, to service the wider Bellarine community. Preserve the individual character, identity and role of each Bellarine township. The overarching policy objectives for the Bellarine do not specifically discourage future development of Barwon Heads. 4 CONCLUSION It is requested that the City of Greater Geelong adjust the settlement boundary to include the land at Barwon Heads Road, Barwon Heads. We understand that many residents do not support the proposed change however future development will deliver improved outcomes for the entire town and future generations. 14 SUBMISSION TO 2016 REVIEW OF THE 2001/2010 BARWON HEADS STRUCTURE PLAN FROM THE BARWON HEADS ASSOCIATION INC. The Barwon Heads Association (BHA) is a community association with over 200 members living in the coastal village of Barwon Heads that has served its community for some thirty years. Our objectives are: To advance the progress, welfare and development of the community living within Barwon Heads and district To provide a forum for discussion of matters affecting the community To represent the community in discussions with Federal, State and Municipal Governments relating its progress, welfare and development. We meet monthly and have a monthly page in the local Talking Heads newsletter. We have a diverse range of members and are in contact with many of our community organisations over a broad range of matters. In summary our main points are Support for the vision statement set out in Bellarine Strategic Plan ( ) No change to the western boundary RGZ regulations are not appropriate and need to be adapted to better guide sustainable development in Barwon Heads Proper vegetation overlays need to be extended to protect existing native vegetation. Support for stronger building controls Maintain the relaxed non-urbanised coastal feel of Barwon Heads that will continue to grow tourism while protecting heritage values. The following are responses to the questions in the Issues Summary Document published by CoGG. We note that there are different questions in the issues paper and we also note that a number of strategic matters are not covered by the questions, regardless of how lateral and positive we have tried to be. These responses: Assume that the boundary of Barwon Heads village is unchanged - this issue is paramount with the Save Barwon Heads Alliance, and their views are strongly supported by the BHA. Propose that all Structure Plan considerations, comments and statistics exclude the stand-alone development of the 13 th Beach Golf and residential area. In particular our responses rely on the fact that Barwon Heads is not part of any designated growth zone. The City of Greater Geelong has at least a 21-year supply of housing lots to meet its growth needs and to comply with State Government planning requirements. Edit or add questions and answers as appropriate because comments on some issues are not sought at all and other questions such as Question 1 ask different questions depending whether they are from the Issues Paper, the Issues Paper Summary or the. Question 1 - Are the existing Structure Plan principles relevant. What are the threats and opportunities? 33

35 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission Answer: Yes, there is total support for the vision statement as set out in the Bellarine Peninsula Strategic Plan ( ). 34 In the year 2016 Barwon Heads will be a unique, sustainable, residential and environmental hub; a landlocked community surrounded by pristine river, coast and wetlands. An intimate community which supports all age groups and provides a place of belonging for residents and visitors alike; where human impact is managed to support the fragile natural surroundings by: Clearly defined limitations on urban development Protecting and nurturing natural surroundings by managing human footprint Supporting walking, cycling, fishing, sailing, surfing, swimming and generally enjoying what our coastal village has to offer in an environmentally sensitive way. There is also full support by BHA members for the Principles and Directions that are articulated in full in the 2010 Structure Plan. Threats: The threats are created by a mismatch between the Structure Plan and the faith the community had in it, and the ad hoc decision making by Council with its demonstrated failure to implement or follow the principles of the Structure Plan. This disconnect has been compounded by the aggressive introduction of the new residential codes and aggressive development. We are part of the Bellarine Peninsula not a satellite suburb of Geelong. Threats include: The risk of imposing Residential Growth Zones over large portions of small village is obvious and there is a suite of State and CoGG planning rhetoric which clearly points out the uniqueness of Barwon Heads and but for retaining the uniqueness, there is nothing to left to protect. The growth in the township will overwhelm the existing character of the town. The monster in the room has always been the threat to shift the township boundaries; an idea predominately advocated by a few landowners who would profit significantly, brings significant threats and creates no opportunities. Lets dispel the concept of cheap housing now. Cheap at what cost to our environment, or coastal village, our roads, our beaches, our way of life? The infrastructure in Barwon Heads does not have the capacity to handle the growth, within Barwon Heads and from the surrounding growth centres of Armstrong Creek and Ocean Grove. There has always been a sharing and closeness between Barwon Heads and Ocean Grove, but its rapid expansion is saturating many of the services we rely on. The growth to our west is unprecedented. We are totally unprepared for the takeover of our beaches and town by people 20 minutes away. This is not tourism; many new residents have adopted Barwon Heads as their town. The history of our town as a fishing village, and the status of our heritage buildings and structures are threatened with destruction by development and decay. Our heritage needs to be protected. Existing heritage overlays are inadequate, as demonstrated by a successful planning application to demolish the 9 Bridge Road house. A thorough heritage survey is required as the current information and heritage overlays are clearly inadequate, Building surveyors are generally not fully apprised of Barwon Heads unique situation and are/maybe processing building approvals, which are/maybe requiring planning permits. There is a major traffic issue. Increasing vehicle numbers and especially large trucks use the arterial road network and the local streets to travel through the village. There are limited and unregulated car parking spaces The current and future risks are associated with projected sea level rise, individual and or combined effects of storm surges, tides, river flooding and coastal erosion Reliance on consultants and expert reports, which take significant community energy and money to respond to, too often, are not implemented and end up gathering dust. Opportunities are created if the principles and directions are implemented, and in particular: Acknowledgement that Barwon Heads is not an appropriate area for urban growth. Simplification of what matters in Barwon Heads and what will work Completion and implementation of controls following a thorough heritage review Completion of and implementation of protections following a thorough vegetation, habitat and environment review Preparation and application of design and development overlays with reference to above surveys The conduct proper traffic analysis and continual review of traffic movements Utilise use of the vacant block in the Hitchcock Av as open space in the middle of town CoGG should restructure so it has expertise and interest in the Bellarine and all it has to offer. Question 2 - In the context of state and local policy, how can growth be managed in Barwon Heads? (Without causing significant harm)? Answer: Apply the previously agreed principles of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan 2010; with appropriate interpretation of state and local government planning legislation. and shrink the RGZ so that the central part of Barwon Heads does not become infested with two and three storey apartments. Review the blanket application of the RGZ to 56 hectares of Barwon Heads. The Increased Housing Diversity Area in Barwon Heads has resulted in apartments being built for holiday rental and bigger single dwellings on a house block; the diversity in housing is not evident. There has been so much paperwork and consultation, but the current issues paper doesn t properly analyse the State planning codes, which are very difficult to reconcile with the local government policies, and plans. The balance is not struck between the protection and growth within residential areas in Barwon Heads. There are significant overlaps of responsibility in Barwon Heads; Vic Roads, CoGG, Barwon Coast, Parks Vic and Barwon Water which should be clarified. Simple memorandums of understanding between these organizations might save a

36 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission lot of time and money and result in a better Barwon Heads and a happier community Question 3 - What elements of residential character are important to you? What type of intensive housing would be most complimentary? Answer: The Barwon Heads coastal village identity and sense of place should be strengthened through appropriately managed growth and appropriately designed public and private spaces. Coastal villages are generally unique. Most, especially Barwon Heads attracts residents and visitors because of the rare village attributes. nice people and a welcoming feel our location near the river and beach our beautiful beaches our native vegetation casual feel of streets with no hard edges and concrete footpaths low building scale variation of styles, but avoidance of the factory built Victorian replicas that work well in Waurn Ponds and inner Geelong but are not coastal houses avoidance of bulk and scale with a high degree of visual prominence proper setbacks for boundary, front and back avoidance of multiple garages on street frontages appropriate landscaping for front, side and back yards nice walks and places to ride Why is there a need for intensive housing everywhere? There are few sites in Barwon Heads that can tolerate the mass, bulk and scale of intensive housing. There are opportunities in the growth zones of Ocean Grove and Armstrong Creek if this type of housing is needed. We agree that a range of dwelling types should be encouraged, including visitor accommodation and housing for smaller households and the older residents who want to remain in town and downsize. It is very obvious that most of the higher density units in the Hitchcock Ave area of the town are used for holiday lets. The principles of environmentally sustainable building design should be encouraged. Heritage buildings require identification, protection and preservation. Question 4 How much planning control would be appropriate to manage residential character? What types of controls or guidelines should be considered? Answer: We strongly support stronger controls for all development in residential areas in Barwon Heads. Alternatively establishing a permit for development that doesn t meet certain benchmarks might be acceptable if the benchmarks are appropriate and actually trigger proper resolution procedures. site coverage building height and setbacks overshadowing dominance of garages and the affect impact on streetscape vegetation controls The RGZ and GRZ regulations do not take into account the character of the town, the environmental and climate change threats (or opportunities) and the limitations of the existing infrastructure. The zones need to be reviewed and the implementation of appropriate design and development overlays (DDO) are needed to allow for the limited growth that is in line with CoGG s prediction of Barwon Heads population. The town character needs to be maintained and natural environment expanded and the limits of the infrastructure and the constraints of the topography recognized in the Structure Plan. DDO to preserve existing vegetation. DDO to expand vegetation cover and habitat. DDO to preserve the town s heritage. DDO to reduce the maximum site coverage. DDO to account for increased storm water runoff from hard all surfaces as housing density increases. DDO to limit the RGZ3 to 100m of the activity centre. DDO to limit building height below the existing tree canopy height. DDO requiring a permit to cut down significant trees. Question 5 - Are there any improvements you think could be achieved within the town centre? Answer: It is important to ensure that the town centre remains as such and is not threatened by ad hoc commercial creep into traditional residential areas. The current commercial area has sufficient capacity to support the local population and visitors. The expansion of the supermarket could further reduce the need to leave town by car. 35 Improvements that we have discussed include:

37 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission We encourage the retention of the old Kindergarten Site in Clifford Pde for incorporation into a neighbourhood hub in Clifford Pde. A neighbourhood house on this site would provide facilities for a range of users including the current users - the Senior Citizens and the vibrant Arts Council and would encourage other groups to interact and participate. This will require significant expenditure on behalf of the council but will have significant and long term benefits for the centre of town. There is a current risk of social infrastructure being spread all over town, requiring further reliance on cars. This is demonstrated by the decision to isolate the new kindergarten from the school and the centre of town setting a poor precedent. There is concern that the library has outgrown the room in the Barwon Heads Primary School and many now have to go to Ocean Grove for library services, however this has become very busy; often standing room only. There is nowhere for students to go and study. It is important that the old kindergarten site in Clifford Parade is retained for community use. There is significant support for a Community Arts Hub, and many in the community would like the library service to be relocated. This is the perfect site for a significant neighbourhood hub with multiple uses, partnering with the existing Senior Citizens Centre. The refurbishment of the Barwon Heads Hotel is long overdue, it is old and dated and could be a draw card that for the community and tourists The new pedestrian safety project should enhance safety for pedestrians through the town. This is a project initiated by the BHA and other community groups with our local member of parliament. It is looking like it may need some policing in the early stages of its use. There is not a fulltime Doctor in Barwon Heads and poor community health facilities. There is a need for enforcement of appropriate garbage storage and removal in the commercial area of Hitchcock Avenue to eliminate the pervading smell of decomposing garbage, particularly in summer. Businesses should be directed not to use the public rubbish bins in the street. Businesses should be encouraged to keep footpaths cleaned of food spills and litter outside their businesses or the Council needs to complete this job. The retail mix in Barwon Heads is poor with a predominance of home wares shops. It should be acknowledged that Barwon Coast provides and maintains the recreation areas along the river for CoGG ratepayers and visitors. This is fully funded from income from the Caravan Parks with little contribution from CoGG. It is important for Council to coordinate more closely with other service providers to promoting greater use of shared services and better integration. Question 6 & 7 - What issues have you had with parking or access? Answer: Parking in the main street is limited, and often not available. Employees and business owners park in prominent spots (evidenced by business names on vehicles). There is little apparent enforcement and there are poor loading facilities for business operators. The continual waiver of the requirement to provide car parks for new developments is evidenced in most of the Hitchcock Avenue in recent years. The argument to reduce the number of car parks is flawed, although it may tick the boxes in planning approvals. There needs to be more robust application of the planning controls to ensure car parking and loading spaces are constructed. Many so-called parking spaces aren t designed for the large vehicles that have become the standard family car, and the little garages are used for storage. Many units are holiday rentals but have insufficient car parks for the number rooms/people accommodated and this results in significant overflow of parking in residential streets around the centre of town. There is a limit to parking close to beaches especially along Flinders Parade and the Thirteenth Beach Road. The huge increase in housing in Armstrong Creek and Ocean Grove will make parking for surfing and river swimming very difficult. Any ideas that Barwon Heads can support further stretching of the present parking amenities to accommodate people from more houses west of our present boundary are absurd. Improvements would include the following: Introduce a DDO to require parking spaces to meet the regulations, not a creative interpretation by some dubious methodology. Retain as much on street parking space as possible by limiting cross over width to double garages and multiple homes on what were single blocks. Emphasis on parking away from congested areas may work in peak holiday periods, but this does not address through traffic volumes and lack of space in the expanding business area. Encourage locals to walk, or if going out with others for ride sharing, and encourage the supermarket to deliver goods. Residents parking permits are now offered in Ocean Grove more information is needed on how well this works. Encourage developers to contribute significantly if waiver of parking requested. Accrue funds to support neighbourhood bus and for park & ride. Complete extension of 40k/h limit in Hitchcock Ave north to Ozone Rd Question 8 are there currently any issues accessing a service out of town? The local library is hard for people to access, it is open for limited times and shared with very busy school. The Ocean Grove library is at capacity; nowhere for students to study or locals to read the newspaper and gather (see suggestion for old kindergarten site Q5). Bus services are infrequent. Question 9 do you support a change of zone to Farming Zone for Stage C of 13 th Beach Resort? This matter is not listed or discussed in the Barwon Heads Structure Plan Issues Paper October This is a trick question and it is disingenuous to include it in isolation from the broader discussion of the boundaries and development. Again there seems to be a benefit only for landowners seeking profit and not for our community Why is the zoning change being proposed? Does CoGG support the change? Would a change to farming result in more or less chance of the land being converted to housing lots? There is insufficient information and transparency to support this proposal. 36

38 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission OTHER ISSUES OF IMPORTANCE DEALT WHICH SHOULD BE PRIORITISED OUR COMMUNITY - this is a strong community, with a broad range of ages. The community evolves and is maintained by people living in the township. The community spirit is compromised when developments are focused on holiday rentals. This is a failure of the RGZ/GRZ zones without adequate controls. There is an obvious opportunity to boost community involvement in a range of initiatives, rather than what we have experienced, a favored few being supported to the detriment of the community as a whole. Community engagement and participation is the basis of good local government. There is no mention of the role of volunteers in Barwon Heads. They play a significant role supporting the fragile marine/coastal environment and throughout the community. GOVERNANCE - we look for greater transparency and appropriate allocation of funds to projects in Barwon Heads. There is little sympathy by ratepayers for our rates to be spent on further development of Armstrong Creek and other new developments. The neglect of central Geelong is a disgrace. SHOULD PLANNING CONTROLS BE APPLIED TO WARRENBEEN COURT TO PROTECT VEGETATION AND LIMIT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT? Yes and urgently. The situation is an example of poor governance by CoGG, whereby the evaluation of the vegetation in this area was noted in the Structure Plan 2010 but CoGG only instigated an evaluation after a dispute between neighbours over the destruction of trees is before the Supreme Court. BOUNDARY the present location should stay where it is and retained in perpetuity from future development through the strongest legislation possible. The protection of the Connewarre wetlands is paramount. The pecuniary interests of a few landowners are not reason enough to allow development that will threaten the future preservation of the RAMSAR wetland. OPEN SPACE Council decided to use open space for a kindergarten. This is not upgrading open space, leisure and recreation spaces. It has impeded further development of a range of recreational activities and has fragmented the town both physically and emotionally. RECOGNITION OF THE POSITION OF BARWON HEADS We are located at the mouth of the Barwon River. As there is increasing development and increased population growth there is significant risk of over development and increased pressure on the environment, infrastructure and amenities. FLOODING & CLIMATE CHANGE - CoGG should undertake environmental investigations into the surrounding wetlands and landscape to determine what is needed protect the natural environment areas and features in the planning scheme. What are the climate change guidelines? Climate change will have far reaching implications for the coastal foreshore. This coupled with overdevelopment presents a significant risk to the future. What are the long term implications of the development of the flood plains to our west? DRAINAGE - It is not appropriate for untreated storm water to be drained into the Barwon River so close to the Ramsar wetlands. This lack of proper water treatment highlights a total failure to understand the interfaces of land and sea and defies good marine and coastal governance TRAFFIC - Where is the current data on traffic travelling in and through the township? GTA Councils traffic consultants identified in 2010 that there was likely to be a steady increase in the volume of traffic through Barwon Heads between Ocean Grove and the south side of Geelong. In the Armstrong Creek Urban Growth Plan, (Framework Plan) authored by CoGG in May 2010 there is a dotted line marking out the East-West Link Road (Arterial) which runs between the Anglesea Road and the Torquay Road and on through the Barwon Heads Road in the direction of the Barwon River and the Bellarine Highway. The first part of this road is complete but the section between the Surf Coast Highway and the Bellarine Highway (which has been a high priority on many CoGG documents for well over six years) urgently needs to be constructed. This link in the Geelong Ring Road is a vital piece of infrastructure serving the whole Bellarine Peninsula and will materially help ease the pressure on the only bridge across the Barwon River downstream from the Geelong Breakwaters. TOURISM - Coastal villages are generally unique. Most, especially Barwon Heads attracts residents and visitors because of the rare village attributes. Each new development results in incremental change to the character of the area and the village. There are numerous examples of large-scale removal of indigenous and significant vegetation, with no requirement to retain or replace vegetation. Our beautiful coastal village is at risk of losing its special feel, and its special trees and other vegetation. Tourism is a vital component of our economy. Assets that attract visitors and are valued by the community should be protected, including the village character, rural and beach vistas and natural environment. There are considerable opportunities in eco-tourism. 132 Please accept this submission from St Quentin Consulting who are acting on behalf of the landowners of 135 Taits Road, Barwon Heads. This submission is a response to the Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update This submission will focus on three key areas: 1. Are the Barwon Heads Structure Plan 2010 principles still relevant? 2. In the context of State and Local policy, how can growth be managed in Barwon Heads? 3. What are the implications on the ecological values of Barwon Heads, should expansion occur? 1. Are the Barwon Heads Structure Plan 2010 principles still relevant? The principles of 2010 in relation to Barwon Heads being a small coastal village with a compact urban form and having an ecologically sensitive environment are still relevant today. Lake Connewarre and the surrounding wetlands have international significant values and the Barwon River and Barwon Heads are symbolic features of the area. The principle of the Barwon Heads Structure Plan 2010 relating to the rural landscape is the principle which is concerning. The principle states to ensure the preservation of the surrounding rural landscape and setting of Barwon Heads. The rural landscape from the Barwon Heads settlement boundary west to the water course which runs from Lake Connewarre to Murtnaghurt Swamp does not have any significant ecological features that requires it to be preserved. It is not covered in hectares of native vegetation, it does not have creeks or waterways running through it, it is not undulating that would make it difficult to access and it is not a crucial food bowl for the area. This rural land is being preserved unfairly as an unequivocal buffer, however there is no evidence that a buffer of this size is needed. The 2010 Barwon Heads Structure Plan map states the rural land is to be kept for resources and scenic values. The soil as a resource in the subject location (see figure 1 below) immediately adjacent to a township, and which is a relatively small land size does not present itself as a resource worth protecting when there are greater issues at play within Barwon Heads. The scenic values of this flat featureless rural land is of benefit only for uninterrupted views of the ecological values, however protecting these values must be more of a priority than protecting the view to them. 37

39 Section B: HELP SHAPE THE PLACE Submissions - Unedited Outputs Report (Part 1) Submission Figure 1. Subject rural land 2. In context of State and Local policy, how can growth be managed in Barwon Heads? The research that Geelong City Council have done leads to one conclusion, there must be an expansion of the Barwon Heads settlement boundary. There is a lack of multiple unit development occurring in Barwon Heads so there is not going to be growth from intensification. The demand for housing in Barwon Heads is so strong and this is not just from outsiders wanting to live here, but includes the elderly and young adults who have spent their entire lives in Barwon Heads but want a new place or a place of their own to live. With the supply in Barwon Heads being so weak there can only be one conclusion and that is to expand the settlement boundary in accordance with figure 1 which is low value rural land. The Geelong City Council cannot be so macro in its views and state that the population increase projected for Victoria has been allocated to nominated growth areas. Every single town in Victoria has a role to play in satisfying Victoria s growth including Barwon Heads. The town must be allowed to expand to locations which have no ecological values and will not remove a significant agricultural resource from the economy. 3. What are the implications on the ecological values of Barwon Heads should expansion occur? The Barwon Heads Structure Plan Update summary paper talked about DELWP and Geelong City Council being concerned about encroachment of the town on the ecological assets like Lake Connewarre. In particular it points out that stormwater runoff may be an issue and an Environmental Effects Statement (EES) may be required as part of a controlled action. This may be true however an EES is just one early step in the entire process and certainly the need for an EES can t be the final judgement on the proposal. A development could be successfully delivered by using water sensitive urban design techniques and other water quality measures. Developers of the rural land may be required to present an EES, but importantly for the growth of the town they must be allowed to present their case and show how they can mitigate any potential impacts on the ecological values. Conclusion The rural land west of Barwon Heads does not deserve the importance currently given to it. It is holding Barwon Heads back from its true settlement boundary which is the water course from Lake Connewarrre south to Murtnaghurt Swamp. Appropriate water quality filtering and buffering to this waterway needs to be scientifically analysed. Development on this rural land means Barwon Heads will still be a small town and still has a compact urban form, will protect the surrounding ecological features but allow a small amount of growth Comment on current plan: - to date COGG statutory planners have not adhered well to ideals of plan. - ideals and concepts still apply as do the basics of the Bellarine Structure Plan. Intention of most submitters is to attempt to retain as much of the character of a seaside town which caters for recreation of many types for permanent residents, holiday folk and day trippers. Planning issues involve attention to these points and meshing them with the aspirations of some wishing to increase their wealth.