Advisory Design Panel Minutes
|
|
- Mervyn Wesley Anthony
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chair: S. Lyon Panel Members: CPL. M. Searle K. Newbert L. Mickelson M. Ehman R. Myers M. Mortensen Advisory Design Panel Minutes Guests: C. Hogan, Focus Architecture Inc. A. Good, DMG Landscape Architects D. Mangat, Darman Holdings Ltd. J. Losee, Jonathan Losee Ltd. P. Martin, Wilson Chang Architect Inc. W. Chang, Wilson Chang Architect Inc. Parks Boardroom #1 City Hall Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2010 Time: 4:13 p.m. Staff Present: T. Ainscough, Planning & Development M. B. Rondeau, Planning & Development T. Mueller, Legislative Services A. RECEIPT OF MINUTES Moved by L. Mickelson Seconded by M. Ehman That the minutes of the Advisory Design Panel meeting held on November 4, 2010 be received. B. OTHER COMPETENT BUSINESS Schedule be adopted. Moved by K. Newbert Seconded by M. Mortensen That the 2011 Advisory Design Panel Meeting C. SUBMISSIONS 1. File No.: New or Resubmit: Resubmit Last Submission Date: June 10, 2010 Description: Proposed mixed-use high-rise residential/commercial development consisting of 210 residential units and 5 commercial units. Address: Avenue, City Centre Developer: Alphonse Kho, Kenstone Properties Architect: Colin Hogan, Focus Architecture Inc. Landscape Architect: Allison Good, DMG Landscape Architects Planner: Pat Lau Urban Design Planner: Mary Beth Rondeau h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 1
2 The Urban Design Planner made the following comments: The development is situated in a prominent location on King George Boulevard and generally meets the intent of urban design guidelines. Green treatments have been incorporated on the boulevard. During the June 10, 2010 ADP, there was discussion surrounding loading and driveway at 98 Ave.; this area has been revised and the loading and driveway have been deleted. In the resubmission, the podium is a more consistent 3-storey base, the tower form has been significantly adjusted, and most of the design responses were related to the response to solar. noted that the FAR has increased slightly from 4.8 to 5.1. With this type of density, it is a matter of how well the building responds to the context and the quality of the proposal. The Project Architect made the following comments: In the June 10, 2010 submission, the base was disjointed and there was concern with how it would interface with future developments. The tower was previously symmetrical and orientation was an issue. There was a feeling that there was a missed opportunity to have the tower more strongly anchor the corner. The loading area has been revised and an auto court provided at the west end of the site. There are two residential units at level 1 of the tower and the feeling from the developer is that they like having residential units at this location. There is a good grade break and the residential units are above the circulation. The big design change is evident in the tower design. The mass of the building has been pulled out to the corner. The north side and the east sides are primarily glazed and have relatively few balconies. At the June 10, 2010 Panel there was a lot of discussion about the south and the west sides and since that time, work was done to improve the response to solar gain. There is more of a punched window kind of language and it takes it down to 50% glazing. The podium is brick at the townhouse level there is more of a glass bay type of glazing. The grade has been raised there by 3 or 4 feet off of the sidewalk elevation to give a stronger sense of entry. On the west side there is a significant amount of balcony to control solar gain. There is now direct access from the living level to south facing rooftop access. The Landscape Architect made the following comments: The site planning changes are minor. There was some discussion about the row of existing trees; the area will be re-landscaped. Decorative paving and exposed aggregate bands will be added. The edge of the green space area will be planted; in the future as more development occurs in City Centre, the City can remove it. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 2
3 At 98 th Avenue the Green Network Study was responded to by adding small unit pavers along the curb edge. There are cut -throughs to all entries to the townhomes. The roof deck plan changed and the space is now more useable. There is an outdoor fitness area and an outdoor amenity area common to the building. As well there is a nature play space for children in the lawn and it very much functions like a back yard for the entire complex. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL STATEMENT OF REVIEW Avenue, City Centre File No Moved by M. Ehman Seconded by M. Mortensen That the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) recommends that the applicant address the following issues to the satisfaction of Planning and Development. STATEMENT OF REVIEW COMMENTS Context and Site Circulation The applicant should be commended for responding to the comments. Good contextual response to adjacent buildings. Form and Character Consider better articulation of form between townhouses and tower. Still an awkwardness where the townhouses connect to the tower along the street edge. There is a conflict; they are not townhouses but are actually tower units. Consider varying the expression at the junction with the tower, e.g., might mean dropping the parapet on the tower part of it to break the line. The top of the tower is improved; there are opportunities to use the tower top as a green roof or amenity space without taking the elevator up. Make it an amenity for the building. On the roof of the townhouses, consideration should be made for a green roof. The two ground floor units seem orphaned / awkward. Landscaping Previous landscaping plan was well developed and the issues have been addressed. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 3
4 CPTED and Accessibility Make sure access is secure for after hours entry sequence, e.g., at the south. Consideration should be given for placing clearly readable address at the top of the building for police air support activities. Sustainability The work done on the south and west elevations are a big step in the right direction. Could look at a little less glass or maybe have a better performance glass on the south and west side to alleviate difficulties due to solar gain. 4:45 PM 2. File No.: New or Resubmit: New Description: Proposed 3-storey apartment consisting of 29 units Address: 10601/09/ Street, City Centre Developer: Darshan Mangat, Darman Holdings Ltd. Architect: Wilson Chang, Wilson Chang Architect Inc. Landscape Architect: Jonathan Losee, Jonathan Losee Ltd. Planner: Jennifer McLean Urban Design Planner: Mary Beth Rondeau The Urban Design Planner provided an overview of the project: Project is located in the NE residential area of the City Centre. It is a residential development with flats on the ground floor with street orientation and 1 level of underground parking. The finer grade road network is being worked out; given the very long existing blocks a partial east/west road would have been sought as part of this development. A future road or lane will likely be sought along the south side of the property. Therefore, the south side of the building should be treated as a primary facade. The proposal is a rezoning to CD with a 1.5 FAR. The area is multiple residential that could be 4 6 storeys and up to 2.5 FAR so this site is below what could be considered. The project generally meets the urban design guidelines; planning staff has no major issues with the site but suggested that the elevation along the south side could have more brick added. The Project Architect made the following comments: The context includes one multifamily development, the rest is single family. The development is a modern character with a flat roof with rooftop balconies, consistent with recent projects in city centre. Brick is the dominant material along the street front. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 4
5 On the first level there is access to 138 th St. and for the upper units there is an entrance through the primary courtyard. The courtyard is slightly elevated as opposed to a typical townhouse design. Each upper unit has an accessible rooftop. The south walkway connects 138 th to the back of the development to provide a street front treatment. The parking entrance is located at the lowest part of the site. The vertical access point from the parking to the courtyard is quite clear and well lit lending to natural surveillance. Due to the project type, it is difficult for wheelchair accessibility. The ground floor units are accessible from the street and to underground parking. Materials used are Hardie board with metal trim. The Landscape Architect made the following comments: There is walkway access to the sides of the building for continuity. The centre has bike parking and terraced gardens. The hydro kiosk will require maintenance; in response, a reinforced turf area was incorporated to allow for vehicular access. Landscaping columns serve as partitions between the units. There is hedge planting to the sides of the units. There are nodes with wide fire access pathways paved with unit pavers. Access to the roof will be a conservative approach of unit pavers and slabs (with appropriate loading); it will be left to the individual homeowners to generate their own landscape response. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL STATEMENT OF REVIEW 10601/09/ Street, City Centre File No Moved by L. Mickelson Seconded by R. Myers That the Advisory Design Panel (ADP) recommends that the applicant address the following issues to the satisfaction of the Planning & Development Department and, at the discretion of Planning Staff, resubmit the project to the ADP for review. STATEMENT OF REVIEW COMMENTS Context and Site Circulation Review of the context was helpful. The scheme and the orientation have a lot going for it because the courtyard is north / south. The general orientation and the way the project links up are interesting. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 5
6 Units on the ground floor are the only units that are potentially wheelchair accessible. In the underground parking there are spaces allowed for disabled parking. In the context of the development (above grade) no provision has been made for wheelchairs. Design develop the pathways to allow more accessibility for the disabled, e.g., remove steps to ground floor units. Form and Character Architecturally the aesthetic is interesting. Biggest concern is the ground floor plan and the liveability of those units. They are very long and narrow. The only access for light is in an area with a glazed canopy. The sun room does not seem like it would provide much light; should be looked at in a different way. The windows are too small in such a deep space; it is not very well thought out. The kitchen design could be more useable. Support the notion of extending the brick along the south side. The proportion of the brick element on the front of the building works; however, the mirroring effect does not work (at the living rooms). There should be another way of articulating, the parapet line could be broken, a fin added, further refinement of the double bay should be considered. Provide weather protection at entrances of all units. Currently there is a two foot overhang and that does not seem to be sufficient. Accessibly is a concern for able bodied people as well as those in wheelchairs. A hydraulic elevator would be beneficial for everyone and expand the market for children, groceries, laundry, etc. Like the roof decks on the third level. Consider opportunity to add shading and a covered area. Consideration should be given to a different treatment than light coloured Hardie panel. The thin profiles around the windows are a challenge to achieve. In terms of the finish detailing of the exterior, the Hardie panel is a rough material and there are more polished panels that cut nicer edges. The way the panel is detailed is important to the success. Landscaping Prudent to look at year round planting and selection that offers year round interest. Large use of hydrangeas is a concern; a more appropriate species should be considered. Some deciduous materials are problematic during the winter months. CPTED and Accessibility Historically the area has been a challenge for police. There is no street lighting and the alleyways and footpaths have pockets of criminal activity. Need to provide lighting at all faces of the building and at key locations, e.g., at the intercom. h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 6
7 Full consideration should be given to a lighting scheme. Encourage a clear definition of public and private space, areas in the back of the development should be strongly defined to prevent / deter individuals with criminal intent. Residents of the complex and visitors need to feel comfortable to exit their buildings from their back doors. Employ structures / techniques to prevent individuals gaining access to the property who should not be there, e.g., signed gates, ensure the gates are high enough so they cannot be easily climbed or jumped. The underground and visitor parking areas are a concern; consideration should be given to making the bike parking area more secure. Proximity of the bike storage room to the entry ramp makes it more vulnerable. One way to provide universal access from the parking is to make sure there is a walkway on either side from the underground up to the drive way. Sustainability Build in more shading on the west facade. There are large expanses of glass; more solar control is required to limit the amount of heat in the summer time. The fact that the windows are inset is a good idea; anything to create more shade would be beneficial; i.e., adding a fin between the large pieces of glass. Other ideas for low sun would be encouraged due to the east / west exposure. The Project Architect made the following comments: Appreciates the comments for the liveability of the ground floor units. Have tried ways to make less problematic. D. NEXT MEETING The next Advisory Design Panel is scheduled for Thursday, December 2, 2010, at 4:00 p.m. in Parks Meeting Room #1. E. ADJOURNMENT The Advisory Design Panel meeting adjourned at 5:34 p.m. Jane Sullivan, City Clerk Stuart Lyon, Advisory Design Panel h:\adp\minutes\2010 minutes\min adp docx Page 7
Advisory Design Panel Minutes
Present: Chair - L Mickelson D. Newby M. Ehman M. Vance T. Coady K. Johnston S. Forrest M. Younger Advisory Design Panel Minutes Guests: C. Kay, Townline S. Jedreicich, Townline C. Mackintosh, GBL Architects
More informationCity of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes
City of Surrey Advisory Design Panel Minutes Parks Boardroom #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2009 Time: 4:07 p.m. Present: Chair - P. Cotter Panel Members: W. Francl A.
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Advisory Design Panel Minutes 2E - Community Room B City Hall 13450-104 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, JUNE 7, 2018 Time: 4:00 p.m. Present: Chair - L. Mickelson Panel Members: J. Leger K. Johnston M. Enns
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Advisory Design Panel Minutes Parks Boardroom #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 Time: 4:15 p.m. Chair: L. Mickelson Panel Members: K. Newbert M. Ehman R. Myers S. Lyon
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Advisory Design Panel Minutes 2E - Community Room B City Hall 13450-104 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2019 Time: 4:09 p.m. Present: Panel Members: L. Mickelson, Chair A. Callison G. Borowski
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Advisory Design Panel Minutes Park's Meeting Room #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2010 Time: 4:00 PM Chair: L. Mickelson Panel Members: Cpl. M. Searle M. Ehman M. Mortensen
More informationWINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES
WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by Council, 2006 WINDSOR GLEN REDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2006 1.0 Master Plan Organization For this area of the Coquitlam Town Centre, a mix of high,
More informationCity of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: 7909-0177-00 PROPOSAL: Planning Report Date: December 13, 2010 Partial Discharge Land Use Contract No. 420 Rezoning from C-35 to CD (based upon RMC-150)
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Advisory Design Panel Minutes 2E - Community Room B City Hall 13450-104 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, JANUARY 26, 2017 Time: 4:03 pm Present: Chair Leroy Michelson M. Enns M. Lesack D. Nelson A. Scott
More informationCity of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes
City of Surrey Advisory Design Panel Minutes Executive Boardroom City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, JANUARY 25, 2007 Time: 3:30 p.m. Present: Chair L. Mickelson Panel Members: R. Knill G.
More information(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4
. General Purpose (DC) Direct Development Control Provision DC Area 4 The purpose of this Provision is to provide for an area of commercial office employment and residential development in support of the
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Present: L. Mickelson - Chair C. Taylor T. Wolf D. Newby N. Baldwin S. Vincent (1 st item only) M. Young S. Forrest Absent: G. McGarva J. Makepeace E. Mashig B. Wakelin T. Bunting B. McGinn T. Coady M.
More informationCity of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes
City of Surrey Advisory Design Panel Minutes Planning Boardroom #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2009 Time: 4:26 p.m. Present: Chair - P. Cotter Panel Members: D. Hamming
More informationHousing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner
Housing and Coach House Guidelines - Ladner Policy D.8: Encourage Compatible Housing Design Encourage housing design that is sensitive to existing single family housing neighbourhoods by requiring a design
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Advisory Design Panel Minutes Parks Boardroom #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2012 Time: 4:00 PM Present: Chair - L. Mickelson Panel Members: N. Baldwin D. Lee S. Lyon J. Makepeace
More informationOfficial Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)
District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing) Effective Date: 1089612v1 District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw
More informationSite Planning. 1.0 Site Context. 2.0 Pedestrian Circulation Systems. Pag e 2-23
The following photographs from throughout the country illustrate key urban design principles. Photographs are provided to illustrate the overall urban design concepts described in Chapter 1 of the Downtown
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER Meeting of the Held at City Hall, 141 West 14th Street, North Vancouver, B.C. in Conference Room A on Wednesday, July 20,2005 M I N U T E S Present: Staff:
More informationDesign Guidelines. Roosevelt. Mike Podowski DPD Design Guidelines Ordinance ATT 13 August 13, 2012 Version #1
Roosevelt Design Guidelines The Roosevelt Neighborhood Design Guidelines apply within the Neighborhood Boundary. Map 1 2 Map 2 3 Map 3 4 CS1 Natural Systems and Site Features Citywide Guideline: Use natural
More information4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre. South fields Community Architectural Design Guidelines Town of Caledon
4.0 Design Guidelines For The Village Centre 4.0 Design Guidelines for the Village Centre The Village Centre is the focal point of the entire South Fields Community and is designed as a traditional commercial
More information599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 599 Kennedy Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: March 7, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Scarborough Community
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Present: Chair L. Mickelson Panel Members: N. Baldwin D. Lee K. Newbert G. Wylie M. Searle T. Bunting Guests: Advisory Design Panel Minutes Craig Taylor, Taylor Kurtz Architecture & Design Architect Patrick
More informationNEW WESTMINSTER DESIGN PANEL
NEW WESTMINSTER DESIGN PANEL Tuesday, 3:00p.m. Committee Room No. 2 MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Ken Falk Jay Hiscox Keith Ross Steve Wong REGRETS: Cheryl Fu Doug Hamming Tom Morton GUESTS: Scott Gordon Rebecca
More informationDesign Guidelines - 1 -
Design Guidelines REAR YARDS Rear yard decks and porches, attached to a garden or garage suite, should be permitted provided minimum rear yard setbacks, separation distances, and necessary site access
More informationClairtrell Area Context Plan
Clairtrell Area Context Plan March 2005 Urban Development Services City Planning Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Development Structure... 6 2.1 Streets... 7 2.1.1 Sheppard Avenue and Bayview Avenue...
More informationUrban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form
Urban Design Guidelines Townhouse and Apartment Built Form Town of Wasaga Beach Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose 1.2. Urban Design Principles 1.3. Application of Guidelines 2. Site Design,
More informationMixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines
1 Mixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines Area Commercial or Mixed Use development occurring in City Centre, Urban Centre, Neighbourhood Centre, or Institutional Complex land use designations is
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Present: Chair - L. Mickelson Panel Members: N. Baldwin T. Wolf B. Shigetomi S. Vincent S. Lyon J. Makepeace Cpl. M. Searle Guests: Advisory Design Panel Minutes Clark Kavolinas, C. Kavolinas & Associates
More informationRegency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning
Regency Developments Urban Design Brief Holyrood DC2 Rezoning Stantec Consulting Ltd. 7-31-2017 1. Overview Regency Developments intends to rezone the lands located at 8510 and 8511 93 Avenue, within the
More informationKEY MAP DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AREA MAP. Sunnymede North Sub-Area Plan
Richmond Official Community Plan BROADMOOR AREA SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN Bylaw 7100 Schedule 2.6C SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN SUNNYMEDE NORTH SUB-AREA PLAN KEY MAP
More informationCity of Redlands Architectural Guidelines for Non-Residential Development
14. Building articulation shall be included in the design of building, in order to create a formal entry statement. Avoid this Do this Page 11 15. Give special attention to creating pedestrian scale and
More informationFRASER LANDS CD-1 GUIDELINES (BLOCKS 68 AND 69) Adopted by City Council April 1989
$1 City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7344 fax 873.7060 planning@city.vancouver.bc.ca FRASER LANDS CD-1
More informationRIVERSIDE DESIGN CD-1 GUIDELINES. Adopted by City Council August 9, 1983
$1 City of Vancouver Land Use and Development Policies and Guidelines Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7344 fax 873.7060 planning@city.vancouver.bc.ca RIVERSIDE DESIGN
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More informationFRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project
FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6
More informationCity of Surrey. Advisory Design Panel Minutes
City of Surrey Advisory Design Panel Minutes Parks Boardroom #1 City Hall 14245-56 Avenue Surrey, B.C. THURSDAY, APRIL 2, 2009 Time: 4:03 p.m. Present: Chair - P. Cotter Panel Members: R. Ciccozzi D. Hamming
More informationCity of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods
City of Vaughan Urban Design Guidelines for Infill Development in Established Low-Rise Residential Neighbourhoods DRAFT - September 2016 Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Policy Context 3 3. Characteristics
More informationURBAN DESIGN PEER REVIEW PANEL MINUTES
MINUTES 2016-03-15 PRESENT: UDPRP Members Adrian Dyer Studiodyer, Architect Jason McIntyre Cornerstone Architecture, Architect John Nicholson Nicholson Sheffield Architects Inc., Architect Jordan Kemp
More informationProposed for Vic West Neighbourhood Plan. Design Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development - Townhouse and Attached Dwelling
Proposed for Vic West Neighbourhood Plan Design Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development - Townhouse and Attached Dwelling Design Guidelines for Intensive Residential Development - Townhouse and
More informationLOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Corner lots with coach houses to increase diversity, provide unity to the streetscape and increase eyes on the street. Garages and ancillary units accessed via rear lanes. Parking
More informationChapter 3: Office & Office Mixed-Use Project Types
Chapter Contents Purpose... 3-2 Applicability and Use Types...3-3 (1) Site Design...3-4 Building Placement and Orientation...3-5 Circulation and Vehicle Parking...3-6 Bicycle/Pedestrian Amenities...3-8
More information1. General Purpose. 3. Uses
1. General Purpose The purpose of this DC1 Provision is to facilitate the development of a pedestrian friendly Community Commercial Centre that may accommodate a range of commercial, residential, office,
More informationNEW WESTMINSTER DESIGN PANEL Tuesday, June 27, :00p.m. Council Chamber
NEW WESTMINSTER DESIGN PANEL Tuesday, 3:00p.m. Council Chamber MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Chris Block Maranatha Coulas Meredith Mitchell David Roppel Craig West REGRETS: Maria Fish Rodney Maas GUESTS: Ross
More informationMINUTES OF THE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY JULY 26, 2017 AT 12:00 P.M. 1. THE PANEL CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 12:10 P.M.
MINUTES OF THE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL MEETING HELD WEDNESDAY JULY 26, 2017 AT 12:00 P.M. 1. THE PANEL CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 12:10 P.M. Panel Members Present: Staff Present: Elizabeth Balderston;
More informationMulti family Residential Development Permit Area
City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Multi family Residential Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character
More informationHIGHLAND VILLAGE GREEN URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPLES/GUIDELINES
URBAN DESIGN GUIDING PRINCIPLES/GUIDELINES CONTEXT/CHARACTER The City of Calgary s Municipal Development Plan (MDP), Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Policy Guidelines and Main Street/Corridor policy
More informationUrban Design Brief to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West
Urban Design Brief 1533 to 1557 Gordon Street & 34 Lowes Road West Reid s Heritage Homes Ltd. & 883928 Ontario Ltd. and RHH Property Management Ltd. City of Guelph Zoning By-law Amendment November 2017
More informationAdvisory Design Panel Minutes
Present: Chair L. Mickelson Panel Members: N. Baldwin W. Francl D. Lee S. Vincent S. Lyon J. Makepeace Cpl. M. Searle Guest Panelists: James Cheng Regrets Jim Hancock Regrets Advisory Design Panel Minutes
More informationWalnut Creek Transit Village Design Guidelines. Part Three III - 25
C. General Design Criteria Part Three DRAFT 0/6/ III - 5 Frontage Types Frontage is a semi-public transition zone at the ground level where public and private realms meet. An understanding of various frontage
More informationCity of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PROPOSAL: Development Permit Planning Report Date: March 10, 2008 Development Variance Permit in order to permit the development of a commercial building and
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF WEST VANCOUVER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES MUNICIPAL HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018 Members Present: Voting Members: Shelley Craig (Chair);
More informationMEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.
MEMORANDUM Date: August 28, 2015 Our File: 1010-20-15-062 To: Design Review Committee From: Lisa Berg, Senior Community Planner Re: Amendment to Development Permit for Park Royal North This memo deals
More informationDistrict of Maple Ridge MAPLE RIDGE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL
District of Maple Ridge MAPLE RIDGE ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the held in the Blaney Room at Maple Ridge Municipal Hall, 11995 Haney Place, Maple Ridge, British Columbia,
More information5.1 Site Plan Guidelines
5. Community Core Guidelines Development of the Community Core will take place by plan of subdivision and site plan approval. It will occur in a phased manner that will reflect the timing of residential
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF DELTA ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL. Laura Ryan, Planner Yvette Luke, Senior Planner Candice Dannhauer, Recording Clerk
THE CORPORATION OF DELTA ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Advisory Design Panel held Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. in the Tilbury Room at Delta Municipal Hall, 4500
More informationPUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THIS CHAPTER PUBLIC REALM
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY This section provides design guidelines for improvements in the public right-of-way. The public right-of-way refers to streets, sidewalks, non-vehicular thoroughfares, parks and greenways
More informationDESIGN GUIDELINES FOR: INTENSIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWNHOUSE AND ROWHOUSE
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR: INTENSIVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TOWNHOUSE AND ROWHOUSE 1. Introduction Townhouse and Rowhouse Building Typologies Within these guidelines, the term rowhouse means a single row
More informationParcel 5. Level 1 Application March 12, Design Submittal POST ROAD RESIDENTIAL
P:\3371 Providence \graphic\meetings and Presentations\2018.03.12_Level 1 Submission/ I-195 Level Redevelopment 1 Design Submission.pdf District Commission Introduction The Level 1 conceptualization of
More informationCommercial Development Permit Area
City of Kamloops KAMPLAN Commercial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of commercial
More information1.3 TOWNHOUSES AND ROWHOUSES
1.3 TOWNHOUSES AND ROWHOUSES Residential - Ground Oriented Housing Residential - Infill Townhouse 27 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The Infill Townhouse (TH) and Rowhouse (RH) multiunit residential area, identified
More informationGuidelines. Building 1. Zoning Provision Building height limit shall be 11m to the mid point of the roof. 2. Building setbacks see Sample Plan.
Objectives Create developments that are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in scale, function and character Minimize impacts on and conflicts with adjacent land uses Promote high quality architecture
More informationEast Bayshore Road Neighbourhood
East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood Northridge Property Management Urban Design Brief 3195 East Bayshore Road City of Owen Sound January 2016 East Bayshore Road Neighbourhood Northridge Property Management
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF DELTA ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL
THE CORPORATION OF DELTA ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Advisory Design Panel held Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 6:30 p.m. in the Tilbury Room at Delta Municipal Hall, 4500
More informationSMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation
SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS ILLUSTRATED WORKING FOR TEST IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW SMALL LOT CODE AMENDMENT & POLICY UPDATE
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 DESIGN BRIEF CONTENTS PART A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS OF SITE CONTEXT 3.0 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES
More informationRezoning Information booklet 6600 Cambie Street
Rezoning Information booklet 6600 Cambie Street December 2013 CONTENTS page Vision 2 Site and Context Context Plan 3 Context Images 4 Proposal Building Design 5-8 Sustainability/Livability 9-10 Landscape
More informationITEMS REVIEWED AT THIS MEETING
URBAN DESIGN PANEL MINUTES DATE: May 21, 2014 TIME: PLACE: PRESENT: REGRETS: 4.00 pm Town Hall Meeting Room, City Hall MEMBERS OF THE URBAN DESIGN PANEL: Ryan Bragg (Chair) Walter Francl Joseph Fry Joseph
More informationDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES Approved by Surrey City Council January 26, 2004 Campbell Heights Business Park - Development Design Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT... 1 2.0 DESIGN OBJECTIVES...
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER Meeting of the Advisory Design Panel following the Joint Meeting with APC held at City Hall, 141 West 14th Street, North Vancouver, B.C. in Conference Room
More informationGUIDELINES REPLACEMENT HOUSING GUIDELINES LOCATION INTRODUCTION URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Replacement housing in the former City of North York will be consistent with the following urban design guidelines. They provide a framework for residential re-development in the former City of North York
More informationHighland Village Green Design Guidelines
Highland Village Green Design Guidelines Publishing Information Title Highland Village Green Design Guidelins Author The City of Calgary Status DRAFT - Proposed document subject to changes Additional Copies
More informationRe: Development Permit Panel Meetings Held on January 27,2016, October 12, 2016 and June 14, 2017
City of, Richmond Report to Council To: From: Richmond City Council Joe Erceg, MCIP Chair, Development Permit Panel Date: September 21, 2017 File: Re: Development Permit Panel Meetings Held on January
More informationUrban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment
Urban Design Brief Proposed Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment 3244, 3263 and 3274 Wonderland Road South Southside Group December 23, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND
More informationPUBLIC HEARING May 18, 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
PUBLIC HEARING May 18, 2010 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION 7. REZONING: 5912-5970 Oak Street Summary: To rezone from RS-1 (single-family) to Comprehensive Development (CD-1) District to permit a 27-unit townhouse
More informationMINUTES OAK BAY ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 AT 5:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL HALL, 2167 OAK BAY AVENUE
MINUTES OAK BAY ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 AT 5:00 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL HALL, 2167 OAK BAY AVENUE MEMBERS PRESENT Andrew Appleton Rus Collins Pam Copley Virginia Holden
More informationWide asphalt driveway abutting school property. garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park. incompatible fencing materials
Wide asphalt driveway abutting school property incompatible fencing materials garage built with incompatible materials, too close to park Lack of plantings as a buffer between private property and open
More informationThis chapter contains the design standards and guidelines for development and improvement of office and industrial buildings and
CHAPTER 4: INDUSTRIAL AND OFFICE This chapter contains the design standards and guidelines for development and improvement of office and industrial buildings and projects. Applicants should discuss specific
More informationDRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES
IHZ Booklet #7 May 6, 2010 DRAFT DESIGN GUIDELINES CANTERBURY 7 Overview During the recent planning process for the Plan of Conservation and Development community character was identified as an important
More informationURBAN DESIGN PEER REVIEW PANEL MINUTES
MINUTES PRESENT: UDPRP Members Steven Cooper Matter Architectural Studio Inc., Architect Jordan Kemp Bousfield Inc., Urban Designer John Nicholson Nicholson Sheffield Architects Inc., Architect Janine
More informationDOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES May 18, 2010 Introduction DOWNTOWN TRANSCONA URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES The Downtown Transcona Urban Design Guidelines ("the Guidelines") establish criteria for
More informationIndustrial Development Permit Area
Industrial Development Permit Area PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Permit Area (DPA) is to establish objectives and provide guidelines for the form and character of industrial development in the
More information4 Semi-Private & Private Open Spaces
4 Semi-Private & Private Open Spaces 4.1 Semi-private Open Space 4.1.1 Common Courtyards The common courtyards for each complex will be designed and programmed for the typical owners living there. They
More informationTel: (705) Fax: (705)
521 and 525 Essa Road City of Barrie Tel: (705) 812-3281 Fax: (705) 812-3438 Email: INFO@IPSCONSULTINGINC.com 1 5 0 D U N L O P S T R E E T E A S T, S U I T E 2 0 1, B A R R I E O N T A R I O L 4 M 1 B
More informationUrban Design Handbook. July2014. Low-Rise Multiple Dwellings
Urban Design Handbook July2014 Low-Rise Multiple Dwellings Table of contents 1 Introduction Purpose Urban Design Principles Application of Guideline 2 Compatibility 2.1 Buiding Mass and Height 2.2 Siting
More informationbuilt form design guidelines
built form design guidelines Derry Green Corporate Business Park 17 built form design guidelines.1 Built Form Design Guidelines Section : Built Form Design Guidelines is intended to be used by both developers
More informationPROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS
PROPOSED WATERFRONT DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS 20.25 DESIGN REVIEW. 20.25.080 WATERFRONT DISTRICT A. Purpose. This section is intended to implement The Waterfront District Subarea Plan by: 1. Creating a
More informationDuplex Design Guidelines
Duplex Design Guidelines Adopted by Council May 29, 2006 Prepared By: Table of Contents 1.0 Application and Intent 1 2.0 Areas of Application 2 3.0 Design Principles 3 4.0 Design Guidelines 4 4.1 Site
More information/05 Architectural Response
/05 Architectural Response 5.1 Inspiration Stacked Boxes (Artist : Rachael Whiteread) Cubism ( Architect : Le Corbusier) 52 1133 Melville Rezoning Submission Patterns ( Textile Artist : Annie Albers) Overlapping
More informationFREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT
FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE March, 2014 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FREEWAY/TOURIST DESIGN STANDARDS March, 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1 Design Site Design
More information5.7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines Guidelines vs.
5.7 Design Criteria for the Private Realm The Private Realm (shown in Exhibit 5.7a) includes the privately owned property not included in the Setback Realm described in the previous section. It encompasses
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Prepared By: METROPOLITAN CONSULTING INC For 2500674 Ontario Inc November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Introduction/Description of Subject
More informationELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN
ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 LOCATION... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONTEXT... 2 4.0 VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 2 5.0 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM... 4 5.1 St. Laurent
More informationForm & Character Development Permit Areas
Form & Character 1.1. Overview 1.1.1. AREAS Lands designated as Downtown Smithers, Multi-family Residential, and Highway 16 Commercial and identified on Schedule: C. 1.1.2. PURPOSE The Form and Character
More informationSCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN
DD/MM/YY Proposed C120 SCHEDULE 12 TO THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO12. GLEN WAVERLEY ACTIVITY CENTRE STRUCTURE PLAN 1.0 Design objectives DD/MM/YY Proposed
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationT O W N O F A J A X URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE GAS BARS / SERVICE CENTRES
T O W N O F A J A X URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MOTOR VEHICLE GAS BARS / SERVICE CENTRES June 2006 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 Purpose... 2 1.2 Organization of the...
More informationPlanning Board Briefing
Planning Board Briefing Why Now? The Sector Plan Implementation Chapter States: Before Stage 1 begins, the following must occur: Approval of the Sectional Map Amendment. Approval of the Greater Lyttonsville
More informationReflect the context of New Westminster and unique characteristics such as history, views and topography.
.0 Design Guidelines 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 Objectives The City of New Westminster will ensure that new development supports a vibrant, pleasant, and people oriented downtown. The guidelines for
More informationSierra Springs Regional Commercial Master Site Plan Airdrie, Alberta Hopewell Development Corporation Project No May 26, 2010
Sierra Springs Regional Commercial Master Site Plan Airdrie, Alberta Hopewell Development Corporation Project No. 205-077 May 26, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Purpose... 2 Master Site Plan Guidelines... 3 Overall
More information