Risk Assessment of large Hydrocarbon Storage tanks. G. Unnikrishnan, Kuwait Oil Company

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Risk Assessment of large Hydrocarbon Storage tanks. G. Unnikrishnan, Kuwait Oil Company"

Johnathan O’Neal’
5 years ago
Views:

1 Risk Assessment of large Hydrocarbon Storage tanks G. Unnikrishnan, Kuwait Oil Company

Of incident scenarios Consequences Impacts

2 What QRAs can tell Incident/failure frequencies Location Specific Individual Risk Identification Of incident scenarios Consequences Impacts Measures of Risk Risk transects Frequency Fatalities (FN Curve)

3 Risk Contours Risk transect

4 ASSURANCE Project: Benchmarking exercises for QRA methods FN Curve Variations in predicted frequencies of defined levels of fatalities ranging between 2 and 4 orders of magnitude by different analysts.

5 Will QRAs would have predicted this? Buncefield. UK: 10 Dec 2005: Property damage, Environmental impact San Juan. Puerto Rico: 23 October 2009: Property damage, Environmental impact Jaipur. India: 29 October 2009: 13 Fatalities. Property damage, Environmental impact

6 Buncefield. Why it happened There should be a clear understanding of major accident risks and the safety critical equipment and systems designed to control them. Time and resources for process safety should be made available. There should be systems and a culture in place to detect signals of failure in safety critical equipment and to respond to them quickly and effectively. There should be effective auditing systems in place which test the quality of management systems and ensure that these systems are actually being used on the ground and are effective. At the core of managing a major hazard business should be clear and positive process safety leadership with top management involvement and competence to ensure that major hazard risks are being properly managed.

7 Buncefield. Recommendations (20) Systematic assessment of Safety Integrity Level requirements Protecting against loss of containment using high integrity systems Engineering against escalation of loss of primary containment Engineering against escalation of loss of secondary and tertiary containment Operating with high reliability organizations Delivering high performance through culture and leadership

8 Jaipur. Why it happened The Loss of containment in terms of time & quantity was never considered a credible event and accordingly not taken into hazard identification. Basic operating procedures for hammer blind opening was not followed. Accident could have been managed if safety measures provided in control room were not made defunct. Backup for emergency shutdown from Control room not available. There was delay in emergency response for long period.

9 Jaipur. Recommendations (118) Engineering related Operation related Procurement related Training related Policy related Use of Remote Operated Valve Tank dike valves position indicators in Control room High reliability High level alarm Automation of Tank Farms in terms of hardware and software Written emergency procedures & training Maintaining Shift manning levels at all times Installation of CCTVs Installation of Hydrocarbon Gas detectors

10 What can be done? Bow Tie Diagram and concept of Barriers

11 Existing methods : Fault Tree Event Tree

12 Bow Tie Diagram: Combination of Fault Tree & Event tree

13 Initiating event probabilities Barrier Failure probabilities Barrier Failure probabilities Consequence probabilities Hazardous event probability

14 Thank you Q & A

AVOID CATASTROPHIC SITUATIONS: EXPERT FIRE AND GAS CONSULTANCY OPTIMIZES SAFETY

AVOID CATASTROPHIC SITUATIONS: EXPERT FIRE AND GAS CONSULTANCY OPTIMIZES SAFETY World-class services help reduce incidents, protect the environment, and keep people and plants safe White Paper PAGE 1 Introduction