Appendix E Soils Information
|
|
- Byron Cook
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix E Soils Information
2 Soil Information: Dinkey Project The following soil information is developed from project level data published in the Polk County, Tennessee Soil Survey (NRCS, 2003). The Soil Survey can be found at in the on-line soil surveys by state listing. This appendix provides a brief description of the soil mapping units and soil series that occur in the proposed action stands for the two alternatives proposing commercial timber harvest areas (Alternatives B and C combined). Three soils of concern are also identified and discussed in this information; Junaluska, Tusquitee, and Suches. The Polk County Soil Survey (NRCS, 2003) is a comprehensive report of the soil types classified and mapped during field surveys conducted by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and the USDA Forest Service. The report contains information on the soil series and soil mapping units that can be used in planning and implementing projects, including interpretations of soil physical and chemical properties, the risks and/or hazards of various land management activities on soil productivity, and recommended design features to mitigate the potential risks and hazards. The section below identifies soil mapping units inventoried and mapped, along with a brief description of the soil series identified in the mapping units. Information highlights the landform position, depth of soil material to bedrock, parent material or geology, soil texture of the primary horizons, internal soil drainage and permeability and percent composition of the soil type for each map unit. The Dinkey project area can be viewed as two separate landscapes as related to the topography and soil types, with resulting levels of challenge and concern for management activities. The portion of the Dinkey project in Compartment 339, north of Allen Gap and Tumbling Creek is primarily mapped in the Evard-Haysville complex soil map units. Slopes in the ErC and ErD units ranges from 5% on the ridges and upper sideslopes to 30% on the sideslopes. Both Evard and Hayesville soils have soil depths to bedrock exceeding 60 inches. These soil map units have slight to moderate risks of impacts from ground-based timber harvest operations and activities which can be planned to mitigate effects by implementing normal best management practices and sale contract provisions. South and west of Allen Gap, the Dinkey project continues into a landscape of Evard-Hayesville complex in Compartment 362, then transitions into soil map units of Junaluska and Tusquitee in Compartment 365, on both the north and south sides of National Forest System Road (NFSR) 65. The Junaluska soil map units, JkD, JkF and JtF; and Tusquitee, TuF, are generally characterized with steeper slope gradients than the Evard-Hayesville units, ranging from 15% in the lower sideslopes to steeper gradients over 35% up to 65% on the middle and upper sideslopes. Junaluska soils are moderately deep to bedrock, and typically occur in areas underlain by phyllite bedrock. These map units are soils of concern, with moderate to severe hazards for ground-based equipment operations common to timber harvesting. Access routes for skidding in stands to be treated and temporary access roads should be pre-planned and located to identify locations that minimize excavation and construction requirements, with timely installation of drainage to address overland storm flow, and restoration of ground cover to minimize erosion during operations and post-activity. Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 1
3 Soil Mapping Units and Soil Series Detailed Descriptions Citico channery silt loam (CcD - 15 to 35% slopes) This mapping unit occurs on lower side slopes, comprised of 85 to 90% Citico soils. These soils are well to forest management with primary concerns of erosion hazard on the steeper portions. Citico channery silt loam (CdD) is mainly found in the Sholer Branch watershed, Compartment 362, Stands 30 and 40. Citico Series: deep soils found on foot slopes, benches and coves; typically colluvial positions. Series is only mapped in Monroe and Polk Counties, TN. Parent material is weathered metasedimentary rocks such as phyllite, slate and slightly metamorphosed shale or sandstone. Depth to hard rock ranges from 40 to 60 inches. Surface horizon soil texture is silt loam, 3 to 8 inches thick, with a subsoil horizon texture of channery silt loam, inches thick. Phyllite channers (flat, gravel size) are found in all soil horizons, ranging in volume from 15 to 35 percent. Citico soils are well drained with moderate permeability. Evard-Hayesville complex (ErC % slopes and ErD, 15-30% slopes) This mapping unit is found on uplands in the Copper Basin area of Polk County. Evard soils make up 45% of the complex mapping unit, with Hayesville soils about 35% of the unit. This mapping unit is well to forest management with few limitations in ErC units; however ErD units have a moderate erosion hazard due to slope gradient. Soil rutting is a hazard on the Hayesville soils due to the clayey soil texture in the subsoil below 9 inches. Evard Series: very deep soils found on mountain slopes, hillslopes and ridges in intermediate mountains of the Blue Ridge. Parent material is high-grade metamorphic or igneous rock such as mica gneiss, hornblende gneiss and granite. Depth to hard bedrock is greater than 60 inches. Surface horizon soil texture is loam or sandy loam, 5 to 12 inches thick. Subsoil horizon texture is sandy clay loam, 20 to 40 inches thick over saprolite. Evard soils are well drained with moderately rapid permeability. Hayesville Series: this very deep, red clayey soil is common to gently sloping to very steep sideslopes and ridges in uplands of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Parent material is residuum from igneous and metamorphic rocks such as granite, mica gneiss, and occasionally from metagraywacke and metasandstone. Depth to hard bedrock is greater than 60 inches. Surface horizon soil texture is loam or fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 inches thick. Subsoil horizon texture is clay or clay loam, 20 to 40 inches thick over saprolite. Hayesville soils are well drained with moderate permeability. This soil series has a moderate to severe hazard for soil rutting in periods of heavy equipment operation due to the clayey texture in the subsoil (from 9 inches to 40 inches below the soil surface). Hayesville soils make up 35% of this soil mapping unit complex. The Evard-Hayesville complex mapping units (ErC and ErD) occur primarily in Compartment 339 north of Allen Gap, and Compartment 362 in the Sholer Branch area. Junaluska fine sandy loam (JkD % slopes; JkF, 35-65% slopes) This mapping unit occurs on upland ridges, shoulder slopes and side slopes. Junaluska makes up 85 to 90% of the mapping unit. Intermingled contrasting components include areas of rock outcrop or higher content of rock fragments. The primary concerns for the JkF mapping unit are the steep slope gradient exceeding 35% presenting challenges in the operation of ground based equipment. Operations on these slopes are also challenged by severe erosion hazard from soil exposure, moderately deep root zone, and droughty conditions or low available water capacity during drier periods of the growing season. Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 2
4 Junaluska-Citico complex (JtF 35 to 65% slopes) Junaluska soils make up 55% of this mapping unit complex; while Citico soils make up 30% of the unit. Descriptions for these two components can be found in previously described map units. Steep slope gradient, exceeding 35%, and severe erosion hazard are the primary concerns for this mapping unit for use of ground based equipment. Operations would generally require excavation of bladed skid roads to create a prism or template for safe movement. Excavation of bladed roads on the steep slopes would require design and layout prior to construction to facilitate installation on slope contours, location of drainage structures, road gradient breaks, and post-harvest rehabilitation. The photo that follows is on a JtF mapping unit located southeast of NFSR 65, near the bridge over Tumbling Creek in Compartment 362. The photo view is upslope toward the ridge. At the photo point slope gradient was measured at 25%, however about 75 feet upslope it increases to 40% continuing up to the ridgetop. The slope shapes are a mixture of concave down slope with intermingled small convex areas where slope creep may have occurred. This combination of slope shapes contributes to the challenges of road location and construction. Junaluska Series: moderately deep soils on strongly sloping to very steep ridges and side slopes of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Parent material is residuum affected by soil creep in the upper part, from low grade metasedimentary rocks such as phyllite, slate and low grade, thinlybedded metasandstone. A key feature or characteristic of the Junaluska series is a solum (soil material) thickness ranging from 15 to 39 inches, over weathered bedrock such as low grade metasandstone or phyllite (can often be dug with a spade). Depth to hard bedrock is greater than 40 inches. Surface horizon soil texture is fine sandy loam, 2 to 10 inches thick, with 5 to 10% metasandstone channers by volume. Subsoil horizon texture is sandy clay loam, 10 to 15 inches thick with 5 to 10% metasandstone channers by volume. Junaluska soils are well drained with moderate permeability. Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 3
5 The Junaluska series are soils of concern, generally recognized as soils that have the potential to create management challenges that warrant additional consideration prior to the introduction of management activities. Two soil characteristics of concern for the Junaluska soils are shallow depth (20 to 40 inches) to soft bedrock and slope gradients over 35%. Excavation to construct roads or trails typically exposes the soft bedrock, which can result in soil creep in the upper part. Productivity is limited due to the shallow depth. These soils are droughty in nature, contributing to challenges in revegetating cut and fill slopes. Design considerations to mitigate impacts include consideration of cable logging methods to minimize road or trail construction where slopes exceed 40 percent, reseeding all disturbed areas with adapted grass and legume species to create adequate ground cover, and avoiding logging operations during wet periods to prevent rutting or soil displacement. The Junaluska soil mapping units occur in Compartment 362 and 365 on either side of Tumbling Creek. A thick exposure (pictured below) of the phyllite bedrock can be readily observed along the north side of NFSR 65 in Compartment 365, west of the dispersed campsite noted along the creek. This outcropping provides a good example of the slope angle of the rock, the thin bedding of the material, and the shallow depth of the soil over the phylite. Suches loam (Su - 0 to 2% slopes, occasionally flooded) Suches Series: very deep soils on nearly level floodplains along creeks and rivers, common to the riparian areas in this portion of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Suches soils formed in loamy alluvial sediments from soils formed in residuum from granite, gneiss, schist and phyllite. Thickness of the soil is 40 to 60 inches or deeper in some profiles. Gravel size fragments range from 5 to 35% by volume in the subsoil. Surface horizon soil texture is loam, sandy loam, or clay loam, 10 to 12 inches thick. Subsoil horizon texture is sandy clay loam or clay loam, 20 to 40 inches thick. Loamy sand is often found at depths greater than 60 inches. Suches soils are well drained with moderate permeability. This mapping unit is subject to occasional flooding for brief periods, primarily in winter months. Suches soils comprise 85-90% of the mapping unit. Suches loam is mapped in the riparian areas of the larger streams in the project area, Tumbling Creek and Sholer Branch, and occurs in the private ownerships adjacent to the project area. Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 4
6 The Suches series are soils of concern, primarily due to the location in floodplains along perennial streams. Typically Suches soils are on the higher part of flood plains, subject to flash flooding type events for brief periods. Management activities in areas of Suches soils need to consider protection of the stream channel and the potential for flash flooding during periods of ground operation. Tusquitee loam (TuF - 20 to 65% slopes) Tusquitee Series: very deep soils on gently sloping to very steep benches, foot slopes, toe slopes and fans in coves of the Southern Appalachian mountains. Tusquitee soils formed in colluvium weathered from igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks such as granite, mica gneiss, hornblende gneiss and schist. Depth to hard bedrock is more than 60 inches. Surface horizon soil texture is loam, 2 to 10 inches thick. Subsoil horizon texture is loam or sandy loam, 20 to 40 inches thick. Tusquitee soils are well drained with moderately permeability. Tusquitee soils make up 85-90% of this mapping unit. The Tusquitee mapping unit occurs in the project area in the lower slopes of Horse Lead Mountain, north of Tumbling Creek and NFSR 221; and the north facing slopes of the mountain south of Tumbling Creek. The Tusquitee series are soils of concern in this project area due to their occurrence in colluvial slope positions which can create challenges in road location and construction, and equipment operation on slopes over 35%. These slopes often are broken or short, creating challenges to normal equipment operations without extra ground impacts. Logging methods that minimize surface horizon disturbance can reduce erosion hazard. Table 1 displays the soil mapping units inventoried and mapped in the project area stands proposed for commercial harvest activities. The mapping units are organized by slope gradient classification to provide a quick review of mapping units with concerns related to slope. Acres by soil mapping unit in the table are based on GIS map analysis. Ratings listed as severe indicate the soil map units recommended for pre-operation planning and design of ground-disturbing activities. Four soil interpretations related to timber harvesting operations using ground-based equipment (skidders, fellers, loaders) are shown in the table. The interpretations were developed by the NRCS using standard methods to evaluate soil properties, landform factors, and potential climate conditions in the project area. These same ratings apply to any occurrence of the soil mapping unit, regardless of land ownership. The ratings of slight, moderate or severe indicate the potential risk for detrimental impacts to the soil mapping unit under equipment operations. Ratings of severe or poorly are particular red-flag interpretations that need pre-activity attention, and post-activity follow-up to maintain soil quality. Detailed discussion of the interpretations follows Table 1. Ratings are an indication of the need for designing and implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) or timber sale contract provisions to mitigate and reduce the risk of detrimental impacts and maintain soil quality and productivity. Implementation of these BMPs is one part of complying with Forest Service soil quality standards, described in Forest Service Handbook FSH R Soil Management Handbook (USFS, 2003). Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 5
7 Interpretations include soil erosion hazard (off-road, off-trail), soil rutting hazard, construction limitations for haul roads and log landings, and harvest equipment operability. Table 1: Soils for All Commercial Timber Harvest Areas (Alts. B and C combined) Map Unit Symbol Soil Mapping Unit Name Upland soils, slopes 5 to 15%. ErC Evard- Hayesville complex Upland soils, slopes 15-35%. CcD Citico channery silt loam ErD JkD Evard- Hayesville complex Junaluska fine sandy loam Slope Gradient Acres by Soil Map Unit Soil Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) Soil Rutting Hazard Construction Limitations for Haul Roads and Log Landings Ground- Based Harvest Equipment Operability Slight Severe Slight Moderately Moderate Slight Moderate Moderately Moderate Severe Moderate Moderately Moderate Severe Moderate Moderately Upland soils, slopes over 35%. These are soils of concern due to steep slope gradient and shallow depth to bedrock in Junaluska soils. Mitigations are required to minimize erosion and soil loss. JkF Junaluska fine sandy loam Severe Severe Severe Poorly JtF Junaluska- Citico complex Severe Severe Severe Poorly TuF Tusquitee loam Severe Severe Severe Poorly Riparian Soils, slopes 0-2%. These soils occur on floodplains and riparian areas of perennial streams in the project area. Suches soils are subject to periods of short duration flash flooding. Su Suches loam, occasionally flooded Slight Severe Moderate Moderately Total Project Acres: 662 Description of Soil Interpretations for Table 1 Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 6
8 The following descriptions are from NRCS Web Soil Survey information for the Polk County, Tennessee Soil Survey (NRCS, 2008). These are standard NRCS soil survey interpretations developed following criteria and ratings found in the NRCS Soil Survey Handbook (NRCS, 1993) or the NRCS National Forestry Manual (NRCS, 1998). The Forest Service is a cooperator in the National Cooperative Soil Survey program, participating and contributing to the development of these forestry interpretations. Soil Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) The ratings in this interpretation indicate the hazard of soil loss from off-road and off-trail areas after disturbance activities that expose the soil surface. The ratings are based on slope and soil erosion factor K. The soil loss is caused by sheet or rill erosion in off-road or off-trail areas where 50 to 75 percent of the surface has been exposed by logging, grazing, mining, or other kinds of disturbance. The hazard is described as "slight," "moderate," "severe," or "very severe." A rating of "slight" indicates that erosion is unlikely under ordinary climatic conditions; "moderate" indicates that some erosion is likely and that erosion-control measures may be needed; "severe" indicates that erosion is very likely and that erosion-control measures, including revegetation of bare areas, are advised; and "very severe" indicates that significant erosion is expected, loss of soil productivity and off-site damage are likely, and erosion-control measures are costly and generally impractical. Soil Rutting Hazard Ratings in this interpretation indicate the hazard of surface rut formation through the operation of forestland equipment. Soil displacement and puddling (soil deformation/compaction) may occur along with rutting. Ratings are based on depth to a water table, rock fragments on or below the surface, the Unified classification of the soil, depth to a restrictive layer, and slope. The hazard is described as slight, moderate, or severe. A rating of "slight" indicates that the soil is subject to little or no rutting. "Moderate" indicates that rutting is likely. "Severe" indicates that ruts form readily and progress to deep ruts if not addressed during operations. The Forest Service Soil Disturbance Field Guide (USFS, 2009) classifies rutting into four classes: none (no visible evidence), shallow (<5 cm, 2 in), moderate (5 to 10 cm, 2 to 4 in), or deep (> 10 cm, 4 in). These classes can be observed as visible evidence of disturbance by vehicle use and provide an indication of soil compaction. Typically the greater the depth of the ruts, the greater the level of soil compaction that can affect soil productivity, particularly movement of air and water in the soil profile. The Soil Disturbance Field Guide can be accessed at: Construction Limitations for Haul Roads and Log Landings This rating is primarily the limitations affecting the construction of temporary haul roads for truck use, and log landings where cut trees are concentrated for processing. The ratings are based on slope steepness, flooding risk, plasticity index (related to clay content in the soil), the hazard of soil slippage or instability (on steeper slopes), sand content, the Unified classification of the soil (engineering properties), rock fragments on or below the surface, depth to a restrictive layer that is indurated, depth to a high water table below the soil surface, and ponding. Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 7
9 Rating class terms indicate the degree to which the soils are to this aspect of forestland management. The limitations are described as slight, moderate, or severe. A rating of "slight" indicates that no significant limitations affect construction activities. "Moderate" indicates that one or more limitations can cause some difficulty in construction. "Severe" indicates that one or more limitations can make construction very difficult or very costly. Harvest Equipment Operability Ratings indicate the suitability for use of ground-based harvesting equipment. The Dinkey Project has identified ground-based harvesting systems as the equipment category to be used for the project. This would typically include mechanized harvest machines to cut the merchantable trees and place for removal (feller-buncher) and rubber-tired skidders to gather and remove cut stems to the log landing for processing. Other ground-based equipment can also operate in the log landing area, e.g. crawler tractors. Suitability ratings are based on slope steepness, rock fragments on the surface, plasticity index (related to content of clay), sand content, the Unified classification of the soil (for engineering purposes), depth to a water table (below soil surface), and ponding (during periods of water saturation in the soil). Rating class terms indicate the degree to which the soils are to this aspect of forestland management. Well indicates that the soil has features that are favorable for the specified management aspects and has no limitations. Good performance can be expected, and little or no maintenance is needed. Moderately indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified management aspects. One or more soil properties are less than desirable, and fair performance can be expected. Some maintenance is needed. Poorly indicates that the soil has one or more soil properties that are unfavorable for the specified management aspect. Overcoming the unfavorable properties requires special design, extra maintenance, and costly alteration. Table 2 displays the acres of each soil mapping unit for the commercial harvest areas by compartment and stand for Alternatives B and C. Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 8
10 Table 2: Soil Mapping Unit by Compartment and Stand for Proposed Harvest Areas Compartment Stand Soil Map Unit Symbol Acres of Soil Map Unit ErC ac cc ErD ac th 6 ac - ESMZ Acres by Proposed Treatment Type Total ErC 6 39 ac cc ErD ac th 9 ac - ESMZ Total ErC ac th ErD 20 2 ac - ESMZ Total ErC 0 10 ac th ErD 13 3 ac ESMZ Total ErC 7 31 ac th ErD 20 Su 3 Total ErC 5 42 ac -th ErD 36 Su 1 Total ErC 5 14 ac - th ErD 9 Total ErC 3 17 ac - th ErD 14 Total ErC 8 39 ac sdtr ErD 40 7 ac th 2 ac - ESMZ Su 1 Total CcD ac th Su 4 3 ac ESMZ Total 15 Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 9
11 Table 2. Continued Compartment Stand Soil Map Unit Symbol Acres of Soil Map Unit Acres by Proposed Treatment Type ErC ac shltr ErD ac th 9 ac - ESMZ JkF 14 Su 5 TuF 10 Total ErD 6 7 ac th JkF 1 5 ac ESMZ Su 1 TuF 4 Total ErD 2 25 ac th JkD 2 3 ac - ESMZ JkF 22 JtF 0.1 TuF 1 Total CcD 4 40 ac cc ErD 0 9 ac th 3 ac - ESMZ JkD 8 JkF 16 JtF 25 Su 0.05 Total JkF 8 8 ac - th Total JkF 8 8 ac - th Su 0.1 Total CcD 4 7 ac - th ErD 3 Su 0.4 Total ErD 10 8 ac th JkF 1 5 ac - ESMZ Su 1 TuF 1 Total 13 Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 10
12 Table 2. Continued Compartment Stand Soil Map Unit Symbol Acres of Soil Map Unit Acres by Proposed Treatment Type JkD 3 10 ac shltr JkF 3 2 ac - ESMZ TuF 6 Total JkD 7 12 ac shltr JkF 1 1 ac - ESMZ TuF 5 Total JkD 5 9 ac sdtr Su ac - ESMZ TuF 5 Total JkF ac th Su 2 6 ac - ESMZ TuF 11 Total JkD 3 9 ac th Su 4 3 ac - ESMZ TuF 5 Total JkD ac th Su ac- ESMZ TuF 1 Total 17 Total Harvest Acres 662 Symbols for treatment types: cc clearcut regeneration, th-thinning, ESMZ- extended streamside management zone, sdtr-seedtree regeneration, shltr-shelterwood regeneration) Appendix E Soil Information Dinkey EA 11
2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam
2014 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape position is one aspect of evaluating the surface features of a certain tract of land. Identifying the correct landscape position will indicate: a. If the
More informationSam Houston Ranger District West/Central WUI Fuels Reduction Project Soil and Water Resources
Soil and Water Resources The Sam Houston National Forest has identified specific wildland urban interface (WUI) areas within Compartments 33, 36, 37, 49, 57, and 66 that contain high fuel loadings. This
More informationIOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA
IOWA FFA STATE SOILS CDE SATURDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2007 AMES, IOWA 1. Moderately sloping has what percent slope: a. 9-14% b. 2-5% c. 5-9% d. over 14% 2. Which of the following horizons is the loose underlying
More informationIowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008
Iowa FFA Soil Career Development Event 2008 1. In Iowa, corn suitability ratings for soil mapping units specifies a. natural weather conditions b. surface and subsurface drainage installed where needed
More informationPits 1 & 3 Questions. 7. Subsurface: Texture (5 pts) A. Coarse B. Moderately course C. Medium D. Fine E. Very Fine
Minnesota Soils Scorecard Questions for Pits 1-4 Scantron # 105481 Use your soils scorecard to fill out the answers on your scantron Bubble in the front side of the sheet for Pit 1 (# 1-45) and Pit 2 (#51-95)
More information2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks.
2018 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions characterizes the location of the soil on the landscape and identifies potential risks. Which landscape position is considered the floodplain
More information108 40' 29'' W Soil Map Mesa County Area, Colorado 108 36' 55'' W 39 10' 11'' N 39 6' 31'' N 4331700 4332500 4333300 4334100 4334900 4335700 4336500 4337300 4338100 701100 701900 702700 703500 704300 705100
More information2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam
2017 Iowa FFA Soil Judging CDE Exam 1. Landscape positions vary in soil composition and makeup. What landscape position would be characterized by having strata and lenses of different textures in the profile:
More informationSOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.
SOIL DATA: Avondale in Allen, TX This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Texas
More informationTeam number Page 1 of Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test. Soils and Climate Change
Team number Page 1 of 9 2006 Canon Envirothon Soils Station Test Soils and Climate Change There are many kinds of soil on the surface of the earth. The kind of soil that is present at a given location
More information2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY
2012 FINAL SOILS AREA 2 Envirothon Questions Answer KEY Questions 1-6 to be answered at the soil pit: 1. Soil scientists categorize soils by drainage classes. What is the drainage class of the soil at
More informationSoil Survey of Nelson County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service In cooperation with United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
More information1. Position (2 pts.) 2. Parent Material (2 pts.) 3. Slope Characteristics (2 pts.) 4. Surface Stoniness or Rockiness (2 pts.)
Maryland Envirothon SOILS Exam Guidance Information (revised 2017) Objective: To test students' knowledge and awareness of basic soil science and its application in wise land-use planning and therefore
More informationLANDPKS TEACHING MANUAL
LANDPKS TEACHING MANUAL IMPLICATIONS FOR LAND DEGRADATION and RESTORATION FOR THE LandPKS LandInfo MODULE Contents: A description of LandPKS application indicators Indicators and how they impact land degradation
More informationButte Mtn. Late Successional Reserve Habitat Restoration Project Soil Report
KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST Butte Mtn. Late Successional Reserve Habitat Restoration Project Soil Report GOOSENEST RANGER DISTRICT JOE BLANCHARD 4/23/2013 Prepared by Joe Blanchard Forest Soil Scientist Klamath
More information2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam
2016 Iowa FFA Soils Evaluation CDE Exam 1. Which of the following is true regarding soil horizons? a. A horizon is darker in color and has more organic matter b. B horizon is darker in color and has more
More informationArea 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key
Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key 1. Soil aeration is the exchange of air in soil with air from the atmosphere. When a soil is well aerated, the air within the soil is very similar to the atmosphere
More information2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY
2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY 1. The majority of the bedrock in Muskingum County is. a. sedimentary bedrock b. glacial bedrock c. igneous bedrock d. metamorphic bedrock
More informationLand Capability Classifications
Land Capability Classifications Unit: Soil Science Problem Area: Basic Principles of Soil Science Student Learning Objectives. Instruction in this lesson should result in students achieving the following
More informationHorner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types
Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types Not present at HMW Adrian Muck Conover Loam 0-4% Slopes Houghton Muck Miami Loam 2-6% Slopes Miami Loam 6-12% Slopes Miami Loam 12-18% Slopes t 0 0.125 0.25 Miles Mary
More informationSTATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL
STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI ASSESSOR MANUAL CHAPTER: REVISION DATE: 10/1/2008 Page 1 of 18 7.3 The purpose of this section of the Assessor s Manual is to supplement the State Tax Commission s published
More informationTopoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau
This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and
More informationCHECKLIST BMPs for FIELD NURSERIES REGULATIONS, SITE SELECTION, WATER MANAGEMENT
CHECKLIST BMPs for FIELD NURSERIES REGULATIONS, SITE SELECTION, WATER MANAGEMENT Regulations For information on the Wetlands Protection Act or the Water Management Act, contact the Massachusetts Department
More informationSoil Formation. 6.E.2.3 Explain how the formation of soil is related to the parent rock type and the environment in which it develops.
Soil Formation 6.E.2.3 Explain how the formation of soil is related to the parent rock type and the environment in which it develops. What is soil? A loose mixture of weathered rock, organic material,
More informationGeology & Soils. Appendix B. Geology & Soils
Appendix B Geology & Soils Geology & Soils A nation that destroys its soils destroys itself. Forests are the lungs of our land, purifying the air and giving fresh strength to our people. Franklin Delano
More informationDO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)
DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11) Circle all the correct answers. 1. What is the layer normally present on the surface of the soil in cropped fields? a. O c. Ap e. B g. R b. A d. E f. C 2. Available
More informationCB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking
CB1 Moderately undulating landscape with slight gilgai (few inches) formation: broad ridge tops and upper slopes of moderately shallow grey cracking clays (Ug5.22 and Ug5.23). Associated are: (i) some
More informationVegetated Filter Strips and Buffers
3.15 Sediment Control Description: Buffer strips (existing vegetation) and filter strips (planted vegetation) are sections of vegetated land adjacent to disturbed areas. They are designed with low slopes
More informationSection 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)
CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2009 SOILS QUESTIONS Please select the best response to the following questions. There are 25 questions; each question is worth 4 points. Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions
More informationEDULABZ. Ans. (b) 7. The soft, porous layer with a good water-retaining capacity forms the
3 SOIL I. Multiple choice questions: Tick ( ) the correct choice. 1. The process of soil formation is called (a) conservation (b) weathering (c) erosion (d) none Ans. (b) 2. Soil profile consists of (a)
More informationSeiad Creek Legacy Roadbed Rehabilitation Project Soil Report
KLAMATH NATIONAL FOREST Seiad Creek Legacy Roadbed Rehabilitation Project Soil Report Happy Camp Oak Knoll Ranger District Joe Blanchard 5/21/2014 Prepared by Joe Blanchard Forest Soil Scientist Klamath
More informationFFA Urban Soil CDE. Items necessary for soil judging. FFA Land Judging Contest 2015
FFA Urban Soil CDE FFA Land Judging Contest 2015 Changes are coming to the Soil Judging Career Development Event (CDE), starting in the upcoming school year, to better reflect today s challenges with soil.
More informationThe analysis area for the scenic resource is the project area described in Chapter 1. Affected Environment/Existing Condition
Chapter 3 - Scenic Resource SCENIC RESOURCES Introduction The Spotted Bear Ranger District is a destination point for outdoor recreation activities and offers a variety of recreation opportunities: driving
More information4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT PROCESS. 4.1 Mechanics of Erosion
4.0 EROSION AND SEDIMENT PROCESS 4.1 Mechanics of Erosion SECTION 4 - EROSION AND SEDIMENT PROCESS Erosion is the wearing away of material by naturally occurring agents through the detachment and transport
More informationSoil types of lake county
Soil types of lake county Ad Adrian muck This deep, level, very poorly drained organic soil is in depressional areas on the lake plain. It is subject to frequent flooding. Slope is generally less than
More informationAnnual lease of the tillable acreage for crops (soybeans and/or corn).
FOR SALE $895,000.00 11201 Hill Road, Woodsboro, Maryland 21798 Crop Farm with Subdivision Potential PRESENTING Location: 11201 Hill Road, Woodsboro, MD 132.2064 acre crop farm with extraordinary views,
More informationNYC Envirothon 2017 Soil Science Review. Richard K Shaw USDA-NRCS
NYC Envirothon 2017 Soil Science Review Richard K Shaw USDA-NRCS Introduction Who Are We? U.S. Department of Agriculture (1862) Natural Resources Conservation Service (1935) What Do We Do? Provide leadership
More informationNRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No
NRCS Soils Report Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well OA Project No. 012-0178 826 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 970.263.7800 FAX 970.263.7456 United States Department of Agriculture
More informationAlluvium Bedrock Chemical Weathering Climate Glacial Till Loess Native Vegetation
1 Alluvium Bedrock Chemical Weathering Climate Glacial Till Loess Native Vegetation Organic Matter Outwash Parent Material Physical Weathering Prairie Soils Timber Soils Topography 2 There are five primary
More informationThe Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag.
Chapter 6 & 7 The Nature of Soil Soil Conservation Sustainable Ag. Climate Soil Forming Factors Parent material Organisms Topography Time Value of Soil Soil is under appreciated Condition of soil affects
More informationPrecision Soil Map for Future Vineyards. Maple Grove Road Farm Acre Tract Maple Grove Road, Monmouth, Oregon.
Precision Soil Map for Future Vineyards Maple Grove Road Farm 119.15 Acre Tract 17845 Maple Grove Road, Monmouth, Oregon. July 30, 2008 By Andy Gallagher Soil Scientist INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Soil
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationASCE - Philadelphia. Soils & Stormwater Management. Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist. Gilmore & Associates, Inc.
ASCE - Philadelphia Soils & Stormwater Management Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist Gilmore & Associates, Inc. Course Overview COURSE OUTLINE Soil Science Fundamentals Discuss United States
More informationVegetated Filter Strips and Buffers
3.15 Sediment Control Description: Buffer strips (existing vegetation) and filter strips (planted vegetation) are sections of vegetated land adjacent to disturbed areas. They are designed with low slopes
More information1300 Peace Haven Road Chapin, South Carolina
For Sale ±3.6 AC Site 1300 Peace Haven Road Chapin, South Carolina Gerald Steele +1 803 744 9851 gsteele@naiavant.com Property Features ±3.6 Acres for sale in Chapin Sales Price: $90,000 Price per acre:
More informationUnit II Soil Management
Unit II Soil Management Lesson 2: Using Soil Survey Manuals Soil survey manuals provide useful information for grassland management. Soil scientists evaluate the soil for chemical and physical properties,
More informationEXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay
SOIL TEXTURE Refers to proportions of sand, silt and clay size particles. These proportions determine water infiltration rates, permeability rates, and water holding rates. Using a soil texture triangle.
More informationThe entire site supports grass on which sheep had been grazing recently.
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS REPORT FOR LAND AT HORSEHAY A^ Agricultural Land Classification of approximately 14 hectares of land to the southwest of Horsehay was undertaken in November 1989. The site lies
More informationThis definition is from the Soil Science Glossary (Soil Science Society of America).
What is Soil? This definition is from the Soil Science Glossary (Soil Science Society of America). soil - (i) The unconsolidated mineral or organic material on the immediate surface of the earth that serves
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSOILS OF THE FREEMAN RANCH, HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS
Freeman Ranch Publication Series No. 4-2000 July, 2000 SOILS OF THE FREEMAN RANCH, HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS Dee Carson Department of Agriculture Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, Texas 78666 INTRODUCTION
More informationURBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES
Class Results - Mystery Soil #1 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sandy Clay Loam Sandy Loam Silty Loam Class Results - Mystery Soil #2 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Silty Clay Clay Loam Sandy Sandy Silty Sandy Silty Loamy Loam Clay
More information2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam
2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam USE THE OCONTO COUNTY SOIL SURVEY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-4 The Pensaukee River Wetland Complex is a mixture of state (Pensaukee Wildlife Area) and privately
More informationVermont Soil and Land Judging Manual
Vermont Soil and Land Judging Manual Revised October 5, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Factors of Soil Formation 1 Parent Material 1 Climate 2 Plant and Animal Life 3 Relief (or Topography) 3 Time
More informationTHE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN
THE BACKYARD SERIES BACKYARD VEGETABLES W 346-A THE TENNESSEE VEGETABLE GARDEN SITE SELECTION AND SOIL TESTING Natalie Bumgarner, Assistant Professor and UT Extension Residential and Consumer Horticulture
More informationFor Sale at $290,000.00
We are pleased to present Stearns Property 77± Acres Forest Township, Rice County For Sale at $290,000.00 Listing Agent: Charles Wingert Office: 507-345-LAND (5263) Toll Free: 800-730-LAND (5263) Direct:
More informationHAVE YOU NOTICED at construction sites how a
Explaining a Soil Profile HAVE YOU NOTICED at construction sites how a cross section of soil has a layered look? Soil near the top of the cross section is often dark, and soil below appears lighter. What
More informationSOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR THE CONNECTICUT PORTION OF THE CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT. Prepared for:
SOIL SCIENTIST REPORT FOR THE CONNECTICUT PORTION OF THE CONNECTICUT EXPANSION PROJECT Prepared for: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 1001 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 Prepared by: AECOM
More informationIf you are not able to turn in your notebook see me or Dan ASAP
Notebook Collection Collecting hard copies now OR Electronic versions using Catalyst drop box Due by 5:30 pm today Use website for link If you are not able to turn in your notebook see me or Dan ASAP URBAN
More informationWisconsin Contractors Institute Continuing Education
Wisconsin Contractors Institute Continuing Education Erosion & Sediment Control Course # 12775 2 hours Wisconsin Contractors Institute N27 W23953 Paul Road, Suite 203 Pewaukee, WI 53072 Website: www.wicontractorsinstitute.com
More informationList of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:
Unit A: Principles of Soil Lesson 4: Formation of Soil Student Learning Objectives: Instruction in this lesson should result in the students achieving the following objectives: 1. Identify 5 factors involved
More informationOverview of Soil Properties
Willie Harris apatite@ufl.edu Acknowledgments: Wade Hurt Mike Vepraskas FAESS Soil Scientists Overview of Soil Properties Website to download files of talks: wgharris.ifas.ufl.edu.hsw.htm Meaning of Soil
More information2014 Envirothon Georgia Soil Study Guide
2014 Envirothon Georgia Soil Study Guide In addition to materials in this document, 2014 Georgia Envirothon contestants are responsible for materials found in the following documents: From The Surface
More informationOverview of Soil Properties
Willie Harris apatite@ufl.edu Acknowledgments: Wade Hurt Mike Vepraskas FAESS Soil Scientists Overview of Soil Properties Website to download files of talks: wgharris.ifas.ufl.edu.hsw.htm Meaning of Soil
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationUrban Conservation Practice Physical Effects ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND HARVEST NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
NOT WELL 800 - Urban Stormwater Wetlands A constructed system of shallow pools that create growing conditions for wetland plants to lessen the impacts of stormwater quality and quantity in urban areas.
More informationGeology, Soils, and Topography October 13, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION. 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION Geology, Soils, and Topography 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography 3.1.1 Existing Conditions Geology The project site is underlain by sedimentary rocks of
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil resources in upper Basho Valley.
Soil resources in upper Basho Valley. Åge A. Nyborg, 2007 Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute. Soil management challenges in Upper Basho Valley Low nutrient content, low organic matter content, deficient
More informationSoil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management
Section C Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management Soil characteristics vary across the landscape Soils vary from one field to another, and often within the same field. Soil differences
More informationTHE SCORE CARD. Observed Soil Properties. Interpretive Soil Properties
Rev. 07/18/2008 Jim Doolittle Doug Malo Tom Schumacher Plant Science Department SDSU and Kent Cooley Lance Howe Bruce Kunze Jim Millar Walt Schaefer Dan Shurtliff Steve Winter USDA Natural Resources Conservation
More informationSoil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop
Soil Interpretations Erosion and Sedimentation Control Planning and Design Workshop Presented by Richard Brooks Presentation prepared by Kristin May Resource Soil Scientists USDA-Natural Resources Conservation
More informationIn 1983, the town evacuated and purchased by government for $36 million
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e Chapter 17 Soil and Environment Weathering: summary in haiku form Rocks brought to surface decompose to sediment and that's weathering. Case
More informationExamining soils in the field. Examining soils in the field. Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field
Examining soils in the field thinksoils Examining soils in the field Environment Agency thinksoils examining soils in the field 31 Examining soils in the field 32 Environment Agency thinksoils examining
More informationUsing Land Capability Classifications
Lesson C7 2 Using Land Capability Classifications Unit C. Plant and Soil Science Problem Area 7. Soil Erosion and Land Management Lesson 2. Using Land Capability Classifications New Mexico Content Standard:
More informationMature basalt volcanic soils
MANAGING NORTHLAND SOILS Mature basalt volcanic soils 8.1.2 Soil types in this group Kerikeri friable clay (KE) Kerikeri friable clay with large boulders (KEb) Matarau friable clay (MC, MCH*) Matarau friable
More informationLand Judging in West Virginia
Guide 406R-LJ Revised 2017 Land Judging in West Virginia A program of WVU Extension Service 4-H and Agriculture and Natural Resources extension.wvu.edu/youth-family/youth-evaluation/landjudging Land Judging
More informationA GUIDE FOR LAND JUDGING IN MICHIGAN. D. L. Mokma, E. Dersch and D. Kesselring
A GUIDE FOR LAND JUDGING IN MICHIGAN D. L. Mokma, E. Dersch and D. Kesselring Michigan State University in cooperation with the Michigan Chapter of the Soil and Water Conservation Society The study of
More informationMLRA 24 THE BIG THREE AND. What s the difference and how do you tell?
MLRA 24 THE BIG THREE AND What s the difference and how do you tell? Ecological Site Descriptions Characteristic Loamy 5-8 Loamy 8-10 Acres in MLRA 24 Droughty Loam 8-10 Shallow Calcareous Loam 8-10 1,510,676
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report Soil Map
77 11' 22'' W Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 77 9' 43'' W 36 48' 13'' N 304700 304900 305100 305300 305500 305700 305900 306100 306300 306500 306700 306900 307100 36 48' 13'' N 36 47' 21'' N 4073800
More informationRangeland Health (Rangeland only)
Chapter 20 Rangeland Health (Rangeland only) 20.1 Overview This chapter covers data elements relating to Rangeland Health. Rills Infiltration and Runoff Waterflow patterns Compaction Layer Pedestals and/or
More informationVEGETATED SLOPE STABILIZATION DESCRIPTION APPLICABILITY. Advantages
4.2-d VEGETATED SLOPE STABILIZATION Alternative Names: Willow Wattles, Live Bundles, Fascines, Live Staking, Joint Planting, Branch Packing, Brush Layering, and Brush Matting DESCRIPTION Vegetated slope
More informationEXPERIMENT 6 PREPARATION OF LAND CAPABILITY CLASS MAP
EXPERIMENT 6 PREPARATION OF LAND CAPABILITY CLASS MAP Structure 6.0 Objectives 6.1 Intnxluction 6.2 Experiment 6.21 Deciding Factors for Land Capability 6.2.2 Requirements 6.23 Procedure 6.3 Observations
More informationLand Judging and Homesite Evaluation Guidebook
Land Judging and Homesite Evaluation Guidebook Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service INTRODUCTION The study of land and its wise use should be important
More informationPERMANENT SEEDING. Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices. Practice no. 6.11
Overview of Sedimentation and Erosion Control Practices Practice no. 6.11 PERMANENT SEEDING Permanent vegetation controls erosion by physically protecting a bare soil surface from raindrop impact, flowing
More informationA Guide for High School Land Judging Contests
NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENTS Soil Evaluations in Washington State A Guide for High School Land Judging Contests August 2014 PURPOSES OF LAND JUDGING CONTEST Land judging serves as a tool to teach youth
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Clearfield County, Pennsylvania
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationRAIN GARDEN ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD. (feet) CODE 897 DEFINITION
ILLINOIS URBAN MANUAL PRACTICE STANDARD RAIN GARDEN (feet) CODE 897 Source: Kendall County Soil and Water Conservation District DEFINITION Rain gardens are small, shallow, flat bottomed depressions constructed
More informationCONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2012 SOILS QUESTIONS
CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2012 SOILS QUESTIONS Please select the best response to the following questions. There are 25 4 point questions. Many have more than one part. Good luck! Section 1: Judging the soil
More informationCedar Niles Future Park Site Wetland #1
Date: October 20, 2014 Site: Landowner: Johnson County Parks Designer: Thomas R. Biebighauser Individuals Present: Thomas R. Biebighauser, Dr. Eliodora Chamberlain (US EPA), Jason Daniels (US EPA), Jeannette
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Alsea Area, Oregon, and Lincoln County Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and McCurtain County, Oklahoma
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Payne County, Oklahoma
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationAY-362-W. INDIANA SOIL Evaluation Field Book. Don Franzmeier, Gary Steinhardt, Cathy Egler Purdue University Department of Agronomy
AY-362-W INDIANA SOIL Evaluation Field Book Don Franzmeier, Gary Steinhardt, Cathy Egler Purdue University Department of Agronomy Table of Contents PREFACE 3 CHAPTER 1 Soil Formation, Soil Properties,
More informationChapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development
CHAPTER 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development 3.0 Introduction The City of Charleston requires that major residential, large commercial (>1 acre),
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA
REPORT For Newtown Landscape Architects SOIL SURVEY OF PORTIONS 81 AND 82 OFTHE FARM VAALBANK 512JQ, NEAR MAGALIESBURG, SOUTH-WEST OF PRETORIA By N.M. Mushia, D.G. Paterson and S.D. Mkula Report Number
More information2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens
2008 SWMM, 2010 Revision City of Tacoma 2.1.4 Roof Downspout Rain Gardens Purpose and Definition Bioretention areas are shallow stormwater retention facilities designed to mimic forested systems by controlling
More informationTopoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No. 23. Waikiwi
This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and
More informationUrban Soils Career Development Event
Urban Soils Career Development Event Effective August 1, 2014 Important Note: Please thoroughly read the Introduction and General Rules Section at the beginning of this handbook for complete rules and
More information