Bradleys Both Parish Council. Neighbourhood Development Plan

Transcription

1 Neighbourhood Development Plan Pre-submission Consultation Draft: March 2016

2 Foreword The Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) for the Parish of Bradleys Both, is a new type of planning document based on the powers granted to local communities under the Localism Act The principle underlying the Act is to create a local planning document which is intended to reflect the views of our local community. It is based on the evidence of the housing, business, transport, community facilities and environmental needs of Bradley and its relationship to the wider Craven District Council s requirements. The aim of the Government is to give greater local input to planning development. This is of increasing significance as District Councils set out their own development plans and meet the growing demand for additional housing. This Plan has been developed by a planning group comprised of Parish Councillors and volunteers drawn from the parish. The concept of an NDP had significant support as expressed by residents at a well-attended meeting in the Village Hall in April 2013 (at Annexe 3). And a further drop-in session was arranged by Craven District Council (CDC) in July 2013 to consider sites that might prove suitable for housing development and would be considered for inclusion in our NDP and CDC Local Plan. In November 2014 the Bradleys Both NDP planning group circulated to every household a consultation document, Planning Together, setting out the themes that the planning group would wish to see incorporated into the NDP. Residents were invited to complete the accompanying questionnaire (at Annexe on Bradley Village Website). The analysis of the questionnaire was undertaken by the Planning Group and the results passed to independent experts to adjudicate on the areas of uncertainty in the responses. All the proposed housing development sites have been visited by members of the Planning Group. They have been assessed for suitability against a standard set of criteria including environmental impact, visual intrusion or impact upon road congestion. We are now at the stage in the process where we are able to consult with our community and stakeholders such as the Environment Agency and others once more before we formally submit the draft NDP to Craven District Council for their own internal assessment. The NDP will then be submitted for assessment to an independent examiner, jointly appointed by Craven District Council and. Once the NDP has passed successful examination it will proceed to Referendum of Bradleys Both residents. An approval rate of over 50% of those voting will be required for the NDP to be incorporated into Craven District Council s Local Development Plan and will have statutory force. Unlike the previous Parish Plan, the approved NDP will implement the vision for our community and shape the future for the next 15 years. The Parish Council and members of the Planning Group are grateful for all the comments and suggestions made by the community thus far. David Cohn Chairman of Bradley Parish Council March 2016 Neighbourhood Development Plan

3 Contents Foreword Introduction Background to the Neighbourhood Development Plan The Neighbourhood Development Planning process How the Neighbourhood Development Plan is organised About our parish Our vision and objectives Conforming with national and local policy Our vision for the future Our objectives Key themes and policies for our Plan Introduction delivering sustainable development Environment (ENV) Housing (HOU) Highways & Transport (HT) Community Facilities & Services (CFS) Employment and local business (ELB) Community Infrastructure Levy Appendix 1 Conservation Area and SHLAA sites Appendix 2 Craven District Council s Current Local Plan Proposals Map Appendix 3 Bradleys Both Policies Maps Appendix 4 Bradleys Both Local Green Spaces Assessment Appendix 5 Housing Engagement Summary Map Appendix 6 Site Briefs Annexe 1 Annexe 2 Annexe 3 Bradley Site Assessments - at on Bradley Village Website Character Assessments - on Bradley Village Website Planning Together Consultation Document / Questionnaire and Bradley Neighbourhood Plab Public Meeting Notices - on Bradley Village Website Neighbourhood Development Plan

4 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Background to the Neighbourhood Development Plan The Localism Act of 2011 empowered communities such as Bradleys Both with the opportunity to shape the future development of the parish by producing a Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP). The NDP will be an official planning document and incorporated into the Craven District Local Plan, both being valid for the next 15 years. All planning applications will be judged by reference to it and it is therefore essential that it is constructed in the form of legally enforceable policies. The trigger date for the commencement of the 15 year NDP term will be when the final planning approval is received. Our NDP will be informed by local community opinions on all planning matters such as the location, style and design of new housing, the location and provision of new facilities; and the protection of the essential nature of Bradleys Both. 1.2 The Neighbourhood Development Planning process Our draft policies for the NDP have now been formulated and the evidence base supporting these policies is complete. There is now a statutory process which must be followed in order to successfully adopt the NDP. This process is shown in the diagram below. Apr 2013 Aug 2013 Dec 2013 Nov 2014 Dec 2014 Jan 2015 Mar 2016 Apr 2016 June 2016 Parish Council decision to proceed with Neighbourhood Plan Application for Neighbourhood Area to Craven District Council Neighbourhood Area designated by Craven District Council Consultation document sent to every household and business Questionnaires completed and returned Analysis of consultation Pre submission Plan approved by Parish Council 6 week public consultation Amended Plan submitted to Craven District Council Neighbourhood Development Plan completed and ready for examination Neighbourhood Development Plan sent for independent examination Referendum of Bradley Parish residents Neighbourhood Development Plan

5 1.2.1 The Neighbourhood Area Figure 1 illustrates the boundary of the parish which is the designated Neighbourhood Area for the NDP. An application to Craven District Council for the designation of the Neighbourhood Area was made on 19th August The Neighbourhood Area was approved on 18th December Our Plan and its policies can only apply to this area, not beyond. Figure 1 Neighbourhood Area and Parish Boundary 8 Neighbourhood Development Plan

6 1.3 How the Neighbourhood Development Plan is organised The Neighbourhood Development Plan is set out as follows: Chapter 2: Our vision for the future of the parish and a set of objectives to realise that vision. Chapter 3: Our policies for achieving the objectives substantiated by evidence and cross referenced to national and local policy, to which the policies need to broadly conform. Appendices: Further information that is too extensive to be included in this document is either listed as appendices and/or is accessible on the Bradley Village website: About our parish A brief history of Bradleys Both This part of North Yorkshire has a history of settlement stretching back many millennia as the Bronze Age burial barrows attest. The earliest standing cottage in the village dates from the 16th Century, and there are many other old and listed buildings that give Bradley a tranquil and time honoured feel The place name element ley implies that Bradley has Anglo-Saxon origins and may have been settled in the 7th or 8th century by the Angles. A ley is a term used to indicate an arable field/ clearing. The Angles who settled this part of Yorkshire were farmers and it is through farming that Bradley would have been developed. The existence of a barrow on Low Bradley Moor, however, indicates the existence of a much earlier culture in the area. By the late 17th century arable farming together with some livestock rearing had become profitable enough for houses to be constructed in stone and several buildings dating from this period can be found in Bradley. In addition to farming the textile industry was becoming established through the weaving of woollen cloth on the hand looms operated in the labourer s cottages. By 1775 the Bradley section of the Leeds to Liverpool canal had been completed and was opening up new markets for the local products. The 19th century saw great developments in manufacturing processes and the inability of the hand loom weaver to compete with the challenges of the industrial revolution was encouraging the rural population to migrate to the towns in search of work. In the 1860 s the construction of the Cross Lane Mill Company and the Rose Shed Mills introduced the industrialisation of textile production. The effect of establishing these two mills on the population density of the village was stimulating. The population of Bradley in 1801 was 315, by 1871 this figure had risen to 486. While farming had originally provided the community with a steady source of employment; throughout the 20th century, farming has steadily declined. Many farms and their buildings have been converted to domestic use and farming is no longer a large source of employment. Neighbourhood Development Plan

7 Societies change and the old mill structures no longer serve modern day needs. New industrial and retail sites built on the North West Bradley/Skipton boundaries now serve a wider population. The open spaces and a more pollution-free environment has encouraged numerous companies to move into the parish bringing with them the skilled labour necessary to support these enterprises. This increase in the work force has stimulated the need to provide additional housing much of which has been located in the parish. The housing stock in Bradley alone has more than doubled in the years since Bradleys Both today Bradleys Both parish is located within an outstandingly attractive horseshoe of hills within which nestles the village of Low and High Bradley. Parishioners value their environment, understand what community means and realise what a charming and precious village they live in. Low Bradley consists of an older segment, made up primarily of a conservation area, and a 20th century mixed development of bungalows and houses. The Parish has valued amenities including two 19th century churches, two pubs and a shop, a respected primary school, the village hall, a 19th century converted mill, playground, playing fields and a sports pavilion. The village encompasses several community-valued green spaces which maintain its harmony within the landscape. High Bradley is a small hamlet of elegant and carefully restored 17th Century houses situated on the brow of the hill overlooking Low Bradley and has commanding views of the Aire Valley. Housing is given over entirely to domestic purposes although the surrounding land is still managed farmland and access is by means of a single track road with occasional passing places. Although not a conservation area, building for non-agricultural purposes in High Bradley would be resisted. The Leeds to Liverpool Canal runs through the parish with a small picnic and relaxation area, and a number of streams flow down from the moor side through the village eventually entering the River Aire below. The Airedale Business Centre is situated one mile from the centre of the village and is within the parish boundary. According to the 2011 Census, Bradleys Both parish has a population of 1244 people, of which 98% are from a white ethnic group. 66% stated that they have Christian beliefs, 21% recorded no religious beliefs. Of the 514 households, 459 have access to one or more cars or vans and 45 households have access to at least 3 cars or vans. The Census shows that 3% of the population are between the ages of 20-24, 5% are between the ages of 25-34, 11% are between the ages of 35-44, 17% are between the ages of 45-54, 16% are between the ages of 55-64, 11% are between the ages of and 15% are 75 and over. There is low unemployment in the area. The majority of people are employed, selfemployed or retired. A breakdown of the population by age and by declared economic activity is presented by the charts overleaf. 10 Neighbourhood Development Plan

8 Age breakdown by population 11% 16% 15% 17% 5% 3% 5% 11% % 75+ Source: UK Census Data 2011 Economic activity Employee: Part time Employee: Full time Self-employed Unemployed Full time student (working) Retired Looking after home or family Students (including full time not working) Long term sick or disabled Other Unemployed age Unemployed age Never worked Long term unemployed Based on 862 responses Source: UK Census Data 2011 Neighbourhood Development Plan

9 2.0 Our vision and objectives 2.1 Conforming with national and local policy According to legislation, although the NDP reflects local issues, concerns and priorities, it must also be in general conformity with national and local planning policy. The following key strategic documents have been taken into account when writing the policies for the NDP National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) The NPPF sets out the Government s expectation that a positive approach should be taken to achieving sustainable development through seeking economic, social and environmental gains jointly and simultaneously through the planning system. Published in March 2012 by the Department for Communities and Local Government (DLCG), the NPPF sets out the Government s planning policies for England and how these are to be applied. It replaces previous guidance, notes and circulars, although some still remain in place until further detailed policy is published. Critically, the NPPF must be taken into account in the preparation of all new local plans, including this NDP. The NPPF policies which are particularly relevant to this NDP are: The presumption in favour of sustainable development Delivering a wide choice of high quality homes Requiring good design Promoting healthy communities Protecting green belt Conserving and enhancing the natural environment. The twelve core land-use planning principles, i.e.: be genuinely plan led; not simply about scrutiny; proactively drive and support sustainable economic development; secure high quality design and a good standard of amenity; take account of the different roles and characters of different areas; support the transition to a low-carbon future; conserve and enhance the natural environment and reduce pollution; re-use previously developed (brownfield) land; promote mixed use developments and encourage multi-functionality for land use; conserve heritage assets; make the fullest possible use of public transport, walking and cycling; support local strategies for health, social and cultural wellbeing for all Craven Local Plan The Craven District Plan is a document setting out how land should be used in the future to achieve economic, environmental and social goals. Policies in a local plan are used to decide planning applications. The Craven District Plan is currently under review and is planned for adoption in 2016/17. Craven District Council will be involved in the review process of this NDP to ensure that the policies within both documents are sufficiently aligned. 12 Neighbourhood Development Plan

10 This version of the NDP will take into consideration both the current Craven District Council planning policies from the existing District Plan which dates back to 1999, and the emerging policy for the new District Plan. 2.2 Our vision for the future From our consultations with the community of Bradleys Both, we have developed the following as a vision of where we want our community to be in 2030: The people of Bradleys Both are proud of their community, character and beautiful surrounding countryside. Our vision is to provide existing and new residents with the opportunity to live and work in a rural community which can grow proportionately whilst still retaining, enhancing and respecting the vitality and character of the parish. We want to protect our heritage, including the surrounding countryside, our open spaces and recreational facilities, without significantly increasing traffic in the village. 2.3 Our objectives In order to see this vision realised, our NDP has the following key objectives: To maintain, and where possible, enhance the character and vitality of the village. To minimise the impact of new development on the surrounding countryside, landscape and ecosystems. To provide existing and future residents with the opportunity to live in a home appropriate for their needs. To respect and preserve Bradley s open spaces, historic features and buildings, local heritage sites and recreational facilities as far as is practicable. To prioritise road safety considerations by: addressing the impact of existing road traffic congestion and on-street parking, improving the dangerous junction of the A629 and Ings Lane for the benefit of both pedestrians and vehicles. To encourage small business growth and maintain farming, tourism and rural businesses. The following section sets out the policies whereby we will see our vision and objectives delivered over the term of the 15-year Neighbourhood Development Plans. Neighbourhood Development Plan

11 3.0 Key themes and policies for our Plan 3.1 Introduction delivering sustainable development At the heart of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) is a presumption in favour of sustainable development, described by the NPPF as a golden thread running through both plan-making and decision-taking. The NDP endorses this approach, with the overriding priority for the Plan being to promote development that meets the needs of present day residents and business, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This golden thread extends through and informs all the policies that follow on and form the heart of the Plan. This means that policies are designed to positively promote opportunities which meet the needs of the community and which re-affirm the character of the parish. Equally, policies will not encourage activities that are perceived to have negative impacts for the residents and the community. The following sections sets out our policies in the following way: Themes: policies are ordered into five themes: Chapter 3.2 Chapter 3.3 Chapter 3.4 Chapter 3.5 Chapter 3.6 Environment Housing Highways & Transport Community Facilities & Infrastructure Employment & Local Business Objectives: the objectives addressed by the policy. Summary of policies a list of policies within each theme. Issues a description of the issue(s) the policy is designed to address. Evidence a summary of the evidence that supports the policy. Policy: a description of each policy. Conformity references: each policy concludes with a summary of how the policy is in conformity with key parts of the National Planning Policy Framework, the Craven District Plan or the Localism Act Neighbourhood Development Plan

12 3.2 Environment (ENV) Environment (ENV) Policies ENV1: Local Green Spaces ENV2: Green Infrastructure Links ENV3: Special Landscape Area ENV4: Nature Conservation ENV5: Wind Turbines ENV6: Control of Solar Farms ENV7: Infill Development ENV8: Protecting Conservation and Heritage Sites The following objectives are addressed by our policies for improving Bradley s environment: To maintain, and where possible, enhance the character and vitality of the village. To minimise the impact of new development on the surrounding countryside, landscape and ecosystems. To provide existing and future residents with the opportunity to live in a home appropriate for their needs. To prioritise road safety considerations by addressing the impact of existing road traffic congestion and on-street parking Local Green Spaces i. Issues New developments must respect the rural nature of the community and its setting by actively encouraging the incorporation of natural enhancement in any development, such as provision and maintenance of footpaths, styles and planting schemes, especially around the canal and recreation ground. The valued green spaces of the village in particular, alongside the wider green infrastructure of the parish, require protection and enhancement. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 96% of those who responded supported the need for a policy to protect open spaces. Although Low Bradley village has no formal village green, it does have a number of significant green spaces within the built up area which provide both amenity and add visually to the townscape. Neighbourhood Development Plan

13 The planning group undertook an assessment of local green spaces found within the parish. This assessment was based on the criteria laid out in the Local Green Spaces Assessment Framework and National Planning Policy Framework. The findings can be found in Appendix 4 and illustrated on the Policies Map, (Appendix 3). iii. Policy ENV1: Local Green Spaces Proposals for any development on the land designated as a Local Green Space will be resisted other than in very special circumstances. These special circumstances are: a) where the community would gain equivalent benefit from provision of a suitable replacement and b) where development is essential to meet specific and necessary infrastructure needs and no alternative feasible site is available. The locations designated as Local Green Spaces are set out in Appendix 4. Conformity reference: NPPF 69-70, 73-74, 76-77, CDC Local Plan ENV Green infrastructure links i. Issues There has been increased development on the Airedale Business Centre in recent years. There are concerns that further ribbon development may be allowed to creep across to the east of the canal and along either side of the A629 road towards Keighley which would affect the rural character of Bradleys Both. Commercial development to the east of the canal at any point between Low Bradley village and the Skipton town boundary and south easterly along the canal would breach the green wedge separating the urban spread of Skipton and the village settlement of Low Bradley. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 98% of those who responded supported the need to protect the green wedge of land between Low Bradley village and the parish boundary with Skipton to the east of the canal in order to prevent ribbon development. Natural England s Green Infrastructure Mapping of Yorkshire and the Humber (2010) identified the Aire Valley corridor as being of strategic regional significance the highest categorisation and the corridor includes all but the area of farmland to the east of the village, as shown on the Policies Map at Appendix 3. The Project describes the corridor as follows: Running across the centre of the region, the Aire corridor connects the remote rural areas of the Yorkshire Dales National Park to Goole through the major urban areas of Leeds and Bradford. Regionally significant, much of the corridor is affected by flooding and the river valley bottom is mainly undeveloped as a consequence. 16 Neighbourhood Development Plan

14 iii. Policy ENV2: Green infrastructure links A defined, continuous green infrastructure link will be maintained to serve to: Protect and enhance the areas of tranquillity which have remained relatively undisturbed by noise whilst providing excellent opportunities for wildlife, recreational and amenity purposes. Provide a multi-functional green corridor that will be maintained so that Bradley does not merge with Skipton and is able to maintain its integrity as a rural community. The defined green infrastructure links are identified on the Policies Maps - see Appendix 3 The Aire/A629/Leeds-Liverpool canal link; The Eller Gill link; The North Gill link; The Bradley Gill link. Development which would sever, block or prejudice the operation of these links as multifunctional wildlife, amenity and recreational resources will be resisted. Conformity reference: NPPF Special Landscape Area i. Issues In order to protect the natural landscape within the parish boundary, a Special Landscape Area (SLA) has been designated to all areas outside the village up to and including the parish boundary, excluding the Airedale Business Centre and Low Bradley village. ii. Evidence The area specified outside Low Bradley but within the parish boundary needs to be designated as an SLA as it is an unspoilt area of farmed countryside, moor and woodlands with far reaching views and vistas, wildlife habitats and numerous opportunities for outdoor recreation. This designation is not to unduly restrict acceptable development and economic activity in the countryside but to ensure that the visual impact of development on the character of the landscape is sympathetic to the surrounding environment. North Yorkshire County Council s Conservation Strategy identified areas of the County where the landscape quality was high and worthy of recognition in a regional or county context. This document shows a Special Landscape Area across the whole Plan Area of Craven District Council. The quality of Craven s landscape was also previously recognised as an Area of Great Landscape Value under the West Riding County Development Plan. Subsequently, the 1999 Craven District Council Local Plan designated the whole parish as an SLA. This policy was later substantiated by the Landscape Appraisal of 2002 undertaken by Landscape Design Associates. Although the designation no longer exists in the emerging Local Plan, this does not detract from the need to protect the unspoilt countryside surrounding the parish. Neighbourhood Development Plan

15 iii. Policy ENV3: Special Landscape Area Within the Special Landscape Area shown on the Policies Map in Appendix 3, development will not be permitted if it adversely affects the visual character of the Special Landscape Area, including its views and vistas. The scale, siting, design and materials of development in the Special Landscape Area should be sympathetic to its character. Conformity reference: NPPF Nature conservation i. Issues New developments must respect the rural nature of the community and its setting by actively encouraging the integration of nature conservation and enhancement in any development, including designating and protecting nature conservation sites and features that are important to the parish. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 98% of those who responded supported the need for a policy to protect the rural aspect of our village, farmland and the environment, including preserving wildlife and biodiversity. iii. Policy ENV4: Nature Conservation Development proposals that would result in either the loss of or unacceptable harm to an existing area of natural habitat will not be permitted unless: Proposed mitigation measures would result in an effective solution to ensure the integrity of the habitat continues after the implementation of the development; or The development concerned identifies appropriate measures for the relocation of the existing habitat to an appropriate site within the Neighbourhood Area. Conformity reference: NPPF Wind turbines i. Issues The Neighbourhood Development Plan appreciates the need for energy conservation and management. Current approaches towards renewable energy, e.g. wind turbines, contribute to this requirement. The Plan also recognises the fragile nature of the local environment and landscape, and the degree to which this would be compromised by an expansion of wind turbines in the parish. 18 Neighbourhood Development Plan

16 ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 92% of those who responded supported the need for a policy to ensure that the number, position and location of wind turbines should not be to the detriment of the surrounding hill top vistas or create distress to the natural beauty of the landscape. iii. Policy ENV5: Wind turbines Proposals for new wind turbines will only be supported if the number, position and/or location does not: damage or compromise the open views across the countryside restrict access to the countryside damage biodiversity Conformity reference: NPPF Control of solar farms i. Issues The NDP appreciates the need for energy conservation and management. Current approaches towards renewable energy, e.g. solar panels, contribute to this requirement. Although there are concerns that there is a proliferation of solar panels throughout the parish, (particularly in Low Bradley), most residential solar panels are covered by permitted development rights, and there are existing siting restrictions that apply within the Conservation Area. This issue is therefore excluded from the Plan. However, there is a risk that a planning application might be submitted for a solar farm within the parish, as demonstrated by similar recent applications in Craven District and neighbouring Bradford. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 94% of those who responded supported the need for a policy to ensure the number and position of solar panels should not have an obtrusive impact on the visual appeal of the village. This is of particular concern if an application for a solar farm is approved. iii. Policy ENV6: Control of solar farms In all cases, large scale ground-mounted solar photovoltaic farms will only be supported where they: - Avoid the best and most versatile agricultural land and allow for continued agricultural use wherever possible; Preserve the inherent openness of designated countryside areas and do not conflict with the purposes for which such areas have been designated; Neighbourhood Development Plan

17 Avoid undulating landscapes where the scope for effective mitigation measures may be reduced; Have no significant adverse impacts on built or natural heritage assets, including on any views important to the setting of such assets; Do not create or aggravate local amenity problems; Are not visually detrimental by reason of siting, materials or design, particularly in respect of the effects of glint and glare on the surrounding area, and including as a result of security measures such as lighting and fencing; Are subject to landscape and visual mitigation measures, such as screening with native hedges, with the aim of completely negating any adverse visual influence. Conformity reference: NPPF Infill development i. Issues Low Bradley village is characterised by relatively dense housing in the Conservation Area, with more extensive properties in more recent developments. In both cases the character of the village would not be enhanced by the loss of gardens, greenspace or back land and would serve to intensify the numbers of properties and vehicular movements in an already congested built up area. ii. Evidence Public consultations demonstrated a very strong need to retain Bradley s village feel by avoiding housing development on infill sites in the centre of the village. Approximately 30 new dwellings have been built in the village since iii. Policy ENV7: Infill Development Proposals for new dwellings on private residential gardens or back land within the plan area should: (a) Not result in an unacceptable reduction of the green space created by the garden or back land itself or in combination with surrounding gardens; and (b) Not result in an unacceptable impact on the landscape and environmental value of the site. (c) Not result in restricted access to the highway. Conformity reference: NPPF Protecting conservation and heritage sites i. Issues New developments must respect the rural nature of the community and its setting by actively encouraging the incorporation of natural enhancement in any development. Our valued conservation and heritage sites must be protected. 20 Neighbourhood Development Plan

18 ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 93% of those who responded agreed that new development should be of high quality design, contribute to local distinctiveness, reinforce the character of local landscapes and building traditions, respond positively to existing site features and integrate well with its immediate and surrounding local area. Policy may also distinguish between design requirements inside and outside the conservation area. iii. Policy ENV8: Protecting Conservation and Heritage Sites New development must preserve and enhance the Parish by: a) Recognising and reinforcing the distinct local character (as set out within the Character Assessment in Annexe 2) in relation to height, scale, spacing, layout, orientation, design, and materials of buildings. b) Respecting and protecting local heritage assets and their settings, particularly listed buildings and the Conservation Area. c) Protecting natural assets, and enhancing the natural environment and biodiversity. d) Considering the impact of proposals on key views and vistas of the local landscape and minimising adverse impacts on these views. Where possible, new development should create views along streets and/or open spaces to the surrounding countryside. e) Incorporating adequate landscaping to mitigate the visual impact of the development and to ensure that proposals merge into the existing village context. Where appropriate, landscaping schemes should seek to include native species. f) Seeking to retain mature or important trees. Development that damages or results in the loss of ancient trees or trees of good arboriculture and/or amenity value will not normally be permitted unless justified by professional tree survey and arboriculture statement. Where removal of a tree(s) of recognised importance can be justified, a replacement(s) of similar amenity value should be provided on site. g) Ensuring new boundary treatments reflect the distinct local character in relation to materials and design. h) Reducing visual clutter by minimising the amount of street furniture, signage, lampposts, barriers and other streetscape features proposed. Conformity reference: NPPF 58, 118, 128, 129, 131, 170, CDC Local Plan H4. Neighbourhood Development Plan

19 3.3 Housing (HOU) Policies Housing HOU1: New housing development HOU2: Allocation of land for 30 homes HOU3: Housing Type and Mix The following of our objectives are addressed by our housing policies: To maintain, and where possible, enhance the character and vitality of the village. To minimise the impact of new development on the surrounding countryside, landscape and ecosystems. To provide existing and future residents with the opportunity to live in a home appropriate for their needs. To prioritise road safety considerations by addressing the impact of existing road traffic congestion and on-street parking New housing development i. Issues Buying or renting a house in Bradley is relatively expensive. Approximately one third of all residents are aged 60 and over. This is roughly twice the national average. There is an unsatisfied demand for affordable or social housing to encourage young people and families with school-age children to remain in the village. Consequently, there is a majority within the community which accept that some housing growth is necessary, but with the proviso that the design of all new developments should be sympathetic to the village s rural character. ii. Evidence There are two separate but connected routes of evidence for the suitability of various sites for new housing development in the village. In the first instance, Craven District Council asked local landowners across the whole District to propose sites which they may be willing to sell for housing development. This was for the purpose of making a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment [SHLAA] for the forthcoming District Plan. In Bradley, 16 sites were offered on which a total of 450 new homes could be built. The assessment of the District Plan was that there is a requirement for a total of 30 new homes over the 15-year term of the plan. A drop-in session was arranged by Craven District Council at the village hall in July This was to present and accept discussion of the 16 sites which Craven had been offered. 22 Neighbourhood Development Plan

20 There were 48 responses to the consultation. In summary the preferences were: a) Sites with easiest access to the A629, specifically those which would not require crossing the village centre. b) Sites BR001, BR002, BR006, BR Additional comments were made about: a) Site BR006. This was the most preferred but was also the subject of most objections. Important factors for development include provision for footpaths, open space and highway improvements. b) Sites BR001, BR002 and BR012 were seen as less visually disruptive. c) Sites BR003, BR004, BR008 and BR011 were the least favoured due to access problems and the village already being congested. Subsequently, in the first public draft version of the District Plan, Craven DC proposed that sites BR006 and BR007 be recommended for development of 30 new houses over the next 15 years. The second route of evidence comes from the analysis of the planning group s November 2014 consultation. This consultation asked for opinions on three preferred sites: BR006, BR007 and BR016 (BR016 was offered after the open meeting of April 2013). Of those who responded to the consultation: 80% supported partial development of BR006, 80% supported partial development of BR007, 83% supported development of BR016. The planning group also visited, reviewed and assessed all the SHLAA sites using a standard set of criteria. Full details are available at Annexe 1 -on the Bradley Village Website at The major considerations were: availability of off-street parking, the need to maintain traffic flow through the village to reach primary routes, pedestrian safety, relationship to the rest of the village and protection of green spaces, distance from village facilities and amenities, protection of thoroughfares from infill development avoidance and mitigation of flood risk. Of those who responded to the consultation: 97% supported the need for policies which would incorporate the above considerations. 1 BR001 Health Lea and Land to Rear, Skipton Road, BR002 Holly Tree House and Land to the Rear, BR003 Land South of Mill Lane, adjacent to Middle Beck, BR004 East of Skipton Road adjacent to Middle Beck, BR005 South of Lidget Road, BR006 Land adjacent to Cross Lane Mill, BR007 Land at Matthew Lane, BR008 Land at College Farm, BR011 Land to east of College Road, BR012 Land to West of Aire Valley Drive, BR013 Land South West of Crag Lane, BR014 Land south of Silsden Road, BR016 Land at Skipton Road Neighbourhood Development Plan

21 The result of the consultation and the planning group s assessments is that new housing should comprise a number of smaller developments, rather than all one site. These are: BB01 (partial development of BR006) BB02 (partial development of BR007) BB03 (previously referred to as BR016) and are judged to best meet the need for 30 homes to be built over the next 15 years. The Bradleys Both NPD seeks to accommodate this number. iii. Policy HOU1: New housing development Proposals must ensure that the new homes are visually integrated with their surroundings, reflecting local character. They must be built to a high standard on sites where sufficient off-street parking is provided. Developments will be supported where flood risk is avoided or mitigated. Conformity reference: NPPF 39, 49, 50, 55, 58, , CDC Local Plan H4, H12. HOU2: Allocation of land for 30 new homes Land for 30 new homes may be allocated on the following sites as identified on the Policies Map (at Appendix 3): Land adjacent to Cross Lane Mill (BB01-BR006) Land at Matthew Lane (BB02-BR007) Land at Skipton Road (BB03-BR016) Site briefs at Appendix 6 inform the future development of these sites. Conformity reference: NPPF 39, 49, 50, 55, 58, , CDC Local Plan H Housing type and mix i. Issues New housing must meet the demonstrated needs of current and future households in Bradley, of all age groups including the provision of affordable housing. In order to provide for any specific mix, the NDP would need up-to-date evidence that such a mix was required. The Plan will require any new housing development to meet needs as assessed in the Craven Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) at the time of any proposed new development. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 97% of those who responded agreed that the type of housing built should satisfy the needs of the local community. 24 Neighbourhood Development Plan

22 iii. Policy HOU3: Housing Type and Mix New homes should be, in size and type, in keeping with the size and type of dwellings already established in the surrounding locality. Exceptions will be acceptable if there is a demonstrated requirement for an alternative type or size of home and where these can be delivered to be in keeping with the surrounding area. Conformity reference: NPPF 17, CDC Local Plan H12. Neighbourhood Development Plan

23 3.4 Highways & Transport (HT) Highways & Transport Policies HT1: Village centre congestion HT2: New development infrastructure The following of our objectives is addressed by our highways and transport policies: To prioritise road safety considerations by addressing the impact of existing road traffic congestion and on-street parking in the village centre and the dangerous junction of the A629 and Ings Lane Village centre congestion i. Issues The roads in the centre of Bradley are generally congested most of the time, particularly Main Street, Victoria Terrace, Lidgett Road, Jackson s Lane and Skipton Road. Parking within the village is at a premium and on-street parking in the centre of the village is inherently hazardous for both pedestrians and cyclists and restricts access for emergency vehicles. On occasions when the A629 is blocked due to a traffic incident or roadworks, or flooding in winter months and traffic diverts, there is heavy traffic through the main routes of the village creating additional hazards. Comments were received about the speed of traffic throughout the village, with many suggesting the need for a 20mph speed limit. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 89% of those who responded agreed that, in order to not increase traffic congestion, new housing developments must demonstrate easy access to and from the major primary routes without the need for residents to cross the village centre. The 2011 census classifies households by the number of cars or vans available to members of the household. According to the census, 46% of households have one car or van available to them, 34% have two cars or vans available to them, 5% have three cars or vans available to them, 4% have four or more cars or vans available to them and 11% do not have any cars or vans available to them. In addition, 38% of pupils (53) attending Bradleys Both Community School travel from outside the village 2. 2 Figures obtained from Bradleys Both Community Primary School February Neighbourhood Development Plan

24 iii. Policy HT1: Village centre congestion New residential or commercial development proposals must demonstrate vehicular access to and from the major primary routes (A629 and A6131) without the need for traffic to pass through the village centre, so ensuring local traffic movements within the village centre do not increase significantly as a result of development. Conformity reference: NPPF New Developments Infrastructure i. Issues The Ings Lane junction with the A629 is particularly dangerous for all users. The fastflowing traffic on the A629 makes it difficult for pedestrians to cross to use the bus, and for vehicles to turn right into Bradley from Keighley, or turn right from Bradley towards Skipton. New provisions are required to improve the safety of this road. There are concerns about the width of Skipton Road and lack of footpaths between Bradley and Snaygill. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 95% of those who responded agreed that new developments must be within easy pedestrian and cycling distance of all village centre amenities. If a highway/footpath needs to be altered for any reason, it should result in an improvement of access to these amenities. Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 92% of those who responded agreed that favourable consideration should be given to any development proposals, outside the obligatory CIL levy, that include the provision of, or significant contributions towards improvements to highways and footpaths that address the highlighted safety issues. 92% supported a safe crossing at the junction of the A629 and Ings Lane to ensure safety of pedestrians and vehicles. The requirement for a safe crossing is supported by road traffic statistics 3. There have been eight collisions recorded between 2005 and 2014 in the 700 metre stretch of the A629 from Rock Royd Farm to the footpath leading to Hamblethorpe Bridge. Five collisions were graded as slight and three as serious. At the junction of the A629 and Ings Lane, which is in the middle of this stretch, two collisions were slight and one serious. Within a short distance of the junction, (approximately 150m) there were two slight collisions and one fatal collision. North Yorkshire County Council have an ongoing vehicle movement census point on the A629, 500 metres south of the first roundabout on the Skipton western bypass. Average traffic flow data between 7am and 7pm for the 11 months ending 31 August 2015 show total vehicle movements of 19, 827; equivalent to almost 1652 vehicle movements per hour, which is 27.5 every minute or one vehicle movement every 2 seconds. In September 2009 a traffic study was undertaken by North Yorkshire County Council. A traffic count was taken at Skipton Road (North of Low Bradley), Ings Lane (West of Low Bradley) and Crag Lane (South of Low Bradley). The average volume of traffic at hourly intervals is shown on the graph below. 3 Source Neighbourhood Development Plan

25 Average volume of traffic per hour Number of vehicles iii. Policy 00:00 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 Time 10:00 12:00 11:00 Skipton Road Ings Lane Crag Lane 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 HT2: New Development Infrastructure New development proposals must be within easy pedestrian and cycling distance of all village centre amenities. Developments that extend and/or improve the footpaths and highways to improve safety will be supported. A priority is to provide a safe crossing for pedestrians and improved vehicular access at the dangerous junction of the A629 and Ings Lane Conformity reference: NPPF 7, 17, 21, Neighbourhood Development Plan

26 3.5 Community Facilities & Services (CFS) Policies Community Facilities & Services CFS1: Maintaining community facilities The following objective is addressed by our policy for maintaining community facilities and services in the parish: To respect and preserve Bradley s open spaces, historic features and buildings, local heritage sites and recreational facilities as far as is practicable Maintaining community facilities i. Issues Bradleys Both has a range of facilities which are cherished by the community. These facilities are: Village Hall and war memorial Bradleys Both Community Primary School St Mary s Church of England Church Bradley Methodist Church Village Shop Two Polish War Memorials The Slaters Arms Public House The Bay Horse Public House Sports Pavilion and Playing Fields Public Toilets ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 95% of those who responded agreed that the above facilities will be listed in the register of community facilities and should be protected. iii. Policy CFS1: Maintaining community facilities Development that would result in either the loss or significant harm to the value of a specified community facility or service will be resisted, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that the operation of the facility or service delivery is no longer financially viable. Development that would enhance the community value or viability of a facility or service will be supported. Conformity reference: Localism Act 2011 s87 Neighbourhood Development Plan

27 3.6 Employment and local business (ELB) Employment and Local Business Policies ELB1: Retaining productive farmland ELB2: Airedale Business Centre ELB3: Supporting Tourism and Rural Business The following objective is addressed by our policy for encouraging employment and local business. To encourage small business growth and maintain farming, tourism and rural businesses Retaining productive farmland i. Issues There are now around 20 working farms in the parish and only two of these are dairy farms. The remaining enterprises are mainly sheep and fattening cattle together with one poultry unit and it is possible that this number will reduce further. There may be some expansion into side-line businesses on farms such as some of those seen at the present time e.g. pet burial sites/catteries/kennels etc. or more substantial diversification projects. ii. Evidence Findings from the initial consultation indicated that 96% of those who responded agreed that there should be a policy that resists proposals that would result in the loss of existing farming businesses through redevelopment or change of use, unless such proposals are for alternative farming enterprises. iii. Policy ELB1: Retaining productive farmland Development which results in the loss or degradation of best or most versatile agricultural land will not be supported except in exceptional circumstances where the benefits to the community are shown to outweigh the harm. Support will be given for farm diversification where this: does not have a detrimental impact on the loss of the most productive and versatile agricultural land. does not result in a significant increase in traffic movements, including HGVs. Conformity reference: NPPF 167, CDC Local Plan ENV Neighbourhood Development Plan

28 3.6.2 Airedale Business Centre i. Issues Airedale Business Centre is situated in the Aire Valley approximately one mile to the west of the main Bradley village settlement on the Western Boundary of the Bradley Parish. Construction of the site was started in the early 1970 s and was substantially complete by the end of the decade, The Business centre has convenient and easy access to the A629 which bypasses the congested town centre of Skipton. The road is one of the main arterial roads leading North from the industrial conurbation of West Yorkshire. The A629 links at the Northern end of the bypass with the A59 which provides the lowest East-West crossing of the Northern Pennines from Yorkshire to the M65 and the northern Industrial areas of Lancashire. The buildings were constructed and designed to accommodate the needs of the developing new industries that were replacing the old textile mills whose products were no longer in demand. The old mill building structures were not capable of being economically modified to meet the new demands. Most manufacturing process require the products to be moved horizontally around the factory rather than in a more time consuming vertical configuration. The underlying policy was to provide more adaptable premises for manufacturing enterprises whilst at the same time, encouraging creative industries. The site constructions were set out to provide adequate access and appropriate parking spaces. It was not envisaged at that time that the site would be developed for local retail shopping. The Localism Act 2011 introduced new rights and powers to allow local communities such as Parish Councils to be involved in the shaping of new developments. The present site with over 40 units most of which are Manufacturing (B2) or Office Use (B1).This type of use is in line with the original purposes of the estate in providing employment for skilled workers and the training opportunity for apprentices. The diverse nature and size of the various enterprises and forms of ownership on the site do not appear to provide a common ground for discussion about site development by owners as to maintenance and where the responsibilities lie in relation to car parking, site development and other issues. The use of the site units for the purposes of storage is not considered the most effective use in so far as it provides relatively low employment opportunities. The recent past has seen an increase in the change of use of sites together with the construction of new developments which are changing the emphasis of the type of activities undertaken. The introduction of supermarkets, take-away shops and sale of hot take-away food to what was a commercial area can have serious repercussions on the Locality in the form of altered traffic flows and pedestrian safety. It is essential that a coherent policy for the Airedale Business Centre site is developed in order to safeguard the economic viability of the Business Centre. If random activity is allowed, there is a clear and present danger to other retailing enterprises within the town of Skipton and nearby villages. The proposed redevelopment on the adjacent Snaygill Park site is an example of the extension of the problem. Neighbourhood Development Plan

29 ii. Evidence The site has enjoyed a steady and successful purpose since the foundation of the site in the early 1970 s. There are no undeveloped sites other than those that have received planning consent and are awaiting construction. The Centre has no undeveloped sites available but the Layout of the Centre is such that redesign and extensions are possible. There is a steady demand from existing site owners for permission to extend or modify their present property. The adjacent North /South and East /West road connections are a significant bonus to the Industrial Park giving easy access to the National road network. Land for Commercial Development in Craven is in short supply iii. Policy ELB2: Airedale Business Centre Proposals to upgrade or redevelop existing employment buildings and surrounding environment will be supported provided that: There would be no adverse impact on the amenities of surrounding users Development is restricted to commercial business Class B Adequate public and staff car parking spaces must be provided Any development must be restricted to within the site boundary of the Airedale Business Centre Conformity reference: NPPF 17, 23, 26, 27, CDC Local plan EMP1. ELB3 Proposals for food and other forms of Class A1 retail development will not be supported. Conformity reference: NPPF 17,23,26,27. Local Plan EMP1 ELB4 Proposals for change of use of existing business premises away from employment activity will be resisted unless it can be demonstrated that the existing use is no longer viable: ie that the site has been marketed for 1 year at a reasonable price and is not suitable for its present purpose. Conformity reference: NPPF 17, 22, CDC Local plan EMP1, 2, Neighbourhood Development Plan

30 3.6.3 Supporting Tourism and Rural Business i. Issues The quiet village of Bradley 2 miles to the South of Skipton offers the visitor the opportunity to enjoy the open air pursuits of walking, cycling and the pleasure of boating on the Leeds and Liverpool Canal. Sitting in the picnic area between the canal and the car park also allows a restful view of the passing canal boats or the swan family on one of their jaunts from their nearby nest. The village recreation ground often provides entertaining games of cricket or soccer at weekends and occasional evenings in the summer whilst the small, well-equipped children s playground gives enjoyment to the younger ones. From the village a number of footpaths lead out across the fields or up to the moorland from which a panoramic view of the Aire Valley and the surrounding Pennine Hills can be seen. The recently upgraded Canal tow path provides the opportunity for a flat walk into Skipton or a pleasant evening stroll to a canal side pub. For those interested in cycling the area which hosted the Tour de France is close by and the beautiful Yorkshire Dales National Park is within easy reach. ii. Evidence Within the parish there are self-catering cottages and nearby, on the road into Skipton, there is a larger hotel which provides accommodation, food and leisure activities. In the parish there is an excellent Boat Hire Company which supplies narrow boat holidays on the Leeds and Liverpool canal or for day Hire. The village has a country pub, serving excellent food, and a village shop for visitors and those wishing to self-cater. Within the parish there is one more pub, a large supermarket and snack bars at the nearby business centre. The NDP would seek to encourage tourism or rural related business that enhances and complements the existing tourism industry in Bradley, and does not impact negatively on the historic character and rural location of the village iii. Policy ELB5: Tourism and Rural Business Appropriate small-scale tourism-related development in keeping with the village s rural location, setting and historic character will be supported where proposals: are appropriate to the village setting in terms of design and materials consider impact on infrastructure and include appropriate mitigation measures to minimise any adverse impacts. e.g. ensuring adequate car parking provision. include the redevelopment or re-use of existing buildings or previously used sites. are small scale and support local tourism linked to the enjoyment of the countryside. Conformity reference: NPPF17, 28. CDC Local Plan EMP6, EMP8, EMP14. New CDC Local Plan SP2 SP3 SP15 SP18 SP19 Neighbourhood Development Plan

31 3.7 Community Infrastructure Levy The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a levy that local authorities can use to raise funds from developers which undertake building projects in their area. Any funds raised will go into improving local infrastructure. has considered various areas where any money could be used to benefit the community, and further feedback from the community has been sought CIL priorities The following key areas have been identified as potentially benefiting from CIL money:. Road safety improvements at the A629/Ings Lane junction Footpath over Bradley Heath at Skipton Road Footpath on Matthew Lane/Ings Lane Allotment facilities Improvement to sports facilities Improvements to Children s playground Visual screening and tree planting on the roads around the Airedale Business Centre and on the A6131 in the Parish creating a green corridor Favourable consideration will be given to those development proposals, outside of the obligatory levy, that include the provision of, or significant contributions towards the establishment any of these priorities by a prospective developer. 34 Neighbourhood Development Plan

32 Appendix 1 Conservation Area and SHLAA sites Neighbourhood Development Plan

33 Appendix 2 Craven District Council s Current Local Plan Proposals Map 36 Neighbourhood Development Plan

34 Appendix 3 Bradleys Both Policies Maps Policies Map 1 Key: Policies Map 1 Neighbourhood Area Green Infrastructure Links Housing Allocation Special Landscape Area The Bay Horse Public House Polish War Memorial Neighbourhood Development Plan

35 Policies Map 2 Key: Policies Map 2 Conservation Area Village Shop Housing Allocation Village Hall and War Memorial Special Landscape Area St Mary s Church of England Church Green Infrastructure Links Sports Pavilion Bradleys Both Community Primary School Public Toilets Bradley Methodist Church The Slaters Arms Public House 38 Neighbourhood Development Plan

36 Appendix 4 Bradleys Both Local Green Spaces Assessment Significance and Rationale for Designation In 2015 the parish of Bradleys Both carried out a green space assessment covering the whole of the parish as part of the neighbourhood development plan. The framework for the recommendations was predetermined by criteria set out in advance by a national standard approach. In the mid 1970 s a conservation area was enacted covering the old historic village of Lower Bradley. Part of the conservation approach was to include areas of green space to maintain the character of the village and ensure the maintenance of the balance between buildings and the natural environment, understanding that harmony with the landscape was an important conservation factor. Since that time there has been a significant reduction to these green spaces by dwelling development much of which lacked harmony and sensitivity to the character of the village. This report has been made using the assessment framework. This assessment is critical to the conservation and land management of the parish for a sustainable future respecting the rights of land owners and farmers, the wider needs of parishioners and the maintenance of a beautiful land. Designated Green Spaces Conservation Area Boundary Neighbourhood Development Plan

37 1. Name/Location West Lane green space. West View Close Corner. Site No. BR015. Sports Ground. Matthew Lane/ Ings Lane. Childrens Playing Area. Sports Ground. Car park to Sports Ground. Parallel with playing field opposite Matthew Lane. Site No. BR007. Picnic area. Canal. Canal path Rear Ings Drive Site No. BR012. Various green spaces. Bradley 60 s Development. Mill Field between Ings Drive & Ings Road. Site No. BR Size 0.1 Hectare 0.15 Hectare 1.5 Hectare 0.01 Hectare 0.2 Hectare 0.8 Hectare 0.1 Hectare Hectares 0.6 Hectare Various small Green plots, Pedestrian Walk ways 0.6 Hectare 3. Adjacent to Existing Properties Houses each side. Corner plot. Opposite Mill and stream. Between toilet block & Pavilion. Opposite West View Close. Traditional Cottages Matthew Lane. 60 s bungalows Ings Drive Woods/fields. A629. Farmland. Ings Drive & parallel with Aire Valley Drive Bungalows. Wood Close, Heath Drive/Crescent, Ings Drive, Raines Drive, Woodfield Drive, Aire Valley Drive. Ings Drive Bungalows, Historic Mill. 4. Local or Community Value Dog walking. School run. Ancient Lane Conservation Land Grazing sheep, Provides safe view Into Matthew Lane. Highly valued amenity. Cricket, football, rugby hockey, Family Day Highly valued Well used amenity. Highly valued & useful. Stone toilet block. Farm Land. Conservation Land Highly valued. parking, picnic recreation & visitor s area. Highly valued community asset. Farm land, Back Lane, access valued & maintained. Highly valued green spaces & pedestrian walkways. Farm land. Sheep grazing. Overflow carpark. 5. Landscape Value Wild grass. flowers. Dry stone walls. Safe walkway to Sports ground. Little. Provides broad pleasing aspect. Dry stone walls. Nil Slight. Trees. Runs down to Canal side. Lower level flood plain. Manicured trees, green space, Outflow Mill Beck. Heritage. Nil. Runs down to canal. Lower level flood plain. Considerable landscape value. Breaks the uniformity of the development. Dry stone walls. Keeps open aspect to Ings Road. 6. Historical Value 18thC West Lane Farm (listed) West Lane Barn Quakers Meeting House. Nil Nil. Nil. Nil. Nil. Medieval Longfield 1773 under canal bridge & supporting ramparts. Canal Nil. Adjacent Longfield Nil. Nil. 7. Recreational Value Lane used for access/egress. Nil. could be Allotment. Highly valued School Amenity. Highly valued for tiny tots. Highly valued amenity. Canal boating/ fishing. Canal, boating, fishing, picnics, relaxation, benches, cycling & walking. As above. Nil. Open spaces, children s games, landscaping. Nil. Maintains open aspect of village. 8. Wildlife or Green Infrastructure Value Bordered with wild flowers and grasses. Mature trees. Unadopted single track. Little. Trees, stream & canal. Dry stone walls. Nil. Blossoming trees & coppice area. Hedging, mature trees Highly valued. Swans & ducks. Diverse habitat, Wild flowers. Diverse species of trees. Voles, weasels, ducks & swans. Dry stone walls. Outgrown hedging. Important green infrastructure balances against tarmac. Nothing discerned. 9. Recommendation Designate as Green Space. Conservation land Possible development site. Do not designate. Designate as Green Space. Conservation land Designate as Green Space. Conservation land Not greenspace Do not designate. Possible development Site. Note Flood Plain canal side. Conservation Area. Designate Portion as Green Space Designate as Green Space. Conservation land Designate as Green Space. Highly valued by estate residents. Designate as Green Spaces. Possible development Site. Do not designate. 40 Neighbourhood Development Plan

38 1. Name/Location The Green, Braimes Field Site No. BR005. Farm land between Skipton Road & Disused Quarry. Ryefield House/ Langholme. Site No. BR016 Junction of Crag Lane and Main St. Site No. BRO 13 Junction Crag Lane and Main St.Converted Chapel.Ivy Terrace. Site No BRO 14. Crag Lane. From end of Ivy Terrace and boundary of conservation area to Hamblethorpe House. Moor rise side over to Jackson s Lane Crag Lane. From end of Ivy Terrace and boundary of conservation area to Hamblethorpe House. Down moor side to the canal. Crag Lane to Southern Parish boundary from Hamblethorpe House. Up to summit of moor side to Jackson s Lane. Crag Lane to Southern Parish boundary from Hamblethorpe House down moor side to the canal. 2. Size 0.5 Hectare 1.6 Hectares 3.5 Hectares. 3.0 Hectares. 1.5 Hectares 15 Hectares 75 Hectares 30 Hectare 3. Adjacent to Existing Properties Traditional & sympathetic mixture of Cottages. Between Aire Valley Drive Development. Dilapidated stone field barn, Ryefield House, Langholme. To the rear of the location running down to canal side. To the rear of the location running across Moorside to Silsden Road. Browfield Barn. Heatherside. Browfield Barn. Heatherside. Mill Ing canal bridge. Wood cottage. Sirebank House. Lower Sire Bank Farm. Newlands Farm. Wood cottage. Hamblethorpe canal bridge. 4. Local or Community Value Highly valued. Sheep grazing. Green Space. Public footpath adjacent to location. Farm land, Conservation land Ancient Green Lane to fells. Farm land to the rear of Main St. Natural Dales landscape.farm Land. Natural dales landscape, Farm Land, canal. Access land over low Bradley Moor Canal frontage. 5. Landscape Value Dry stone walls. Conservation Area centre. Natural farm land. Landscape feature rising to Moorside. Adjacent to Natural spring. Natural farm land. Mature trees. Dry stone walls. Natural rising land. Landscape value. High value, leading up moor side. High scenic value. High value. Leading down Moor side. High scenic value. High value landscape and Habitat. Stunning views over Aire Valley and beyond. High Value landscape and Habitat. Stunning views over Aire Valley and beyond. 6. Historical Value Perceived as village centre. Ancient maps show village developed around the green. Nil. Village stone sign. Site BRO13 Opposite listed spinning cottage. Old Spinning cottage (Listed). Village stone sign, viewing seat. Nil. - Long Cairn and Cairn sites. Protected Ancient Monuments. Site of Polish Monument at canal side. Hamblethorpe stones Ancient Monument. 7. Recreational Value Maintains open aspect of village. Nil. public footpath Nil. Nil. Public footpaths. walkers. Public footpaths. Public footpaths. Walking and holiday visitors. Public footpaths. Walking and holiday visitors. Canal boating. 8. Wildlife or Green Infrastructure Value Highly Valued green space in village centre. Grass & hawthorn. Habitat for little owl. Mature trees and hedging. Dry stone walls. Roadside wild flowers. Mature trees and hedging. Dry stone Walls. Woodland. mature trees. Tree plantation. Stone trough. Deer, wild heather, wildlife habitat. Roadside wild flowers. Dry stone walls. Mature trees. Wildlife habitat. Roadside wild flowers. Mature woodland open heath and farm land. Dry stone walls. Steep drop to Canal. Water birds and wild life habitat. 9. Recommendation Designate as Green Space. Conservation Land Possible Development Site. Do not designate Designate a Green Space Designate as Green Space Primarily a road. Do not designate. Do not designate as Green Space too extensive. Do not designate as Green Space too extensive. Do not designate as Green Space too extensive. Neighbourhood Development Plan

39 1. Name/Location From Canal and A629 and A6131to the Western Parish Boundary Silsden Road (Jackson s Lane) taking in Skipton Road and A6131 Boundaries Land between Skipton Road and A629 and A6131. Connected to Site No BRO12 Primrose Hill. Cul-De-Sac. Private road. College Road. College Court. College Crescent. Site No BRO11. Site No BROO8. Public Footpath side of Methodist church off Lidgett Road. And Site No BROO4 Junction of Lidgett Road and Mill Lane. Lower Mill Lane. and Site No BROO3 2. Size 140 Hectares 750 Hectares. Land area covers approx, three quarters of the land mass of the Parish of Bradleys Both 45 Hectares Fronting BRO Hectare. 1.0 Hectare BRO Hectare BRO Hectare footpath. BROO4 2.5 Hectares. 0.1 Hectare. 0.5 Hectare 3. Adjacent to Existing Properties Airedale Business Centre (ABC). Ings Lane. Canal Bridge. Low End Farm. Bradley Ings. Isolated farms Snaygill canal boats. Snaygill bridge. Woods Laithe. Mixture of 19th and 20th century cottages. College House. College Farm. Meadow Croft Barn. Old Hall. Grange House. A mixture of Development. 18th Century Church and Cottages opposite Village Shop. No 1 Mill Lane. No 4 Lidget Road. 19th century cottages. 20th century bungalows. Two Eye-Sore and garage extensions to Hill Crest properties leading onto Mill Lane. No 1 Mill Lane. 4. Local or Community Value Canal frontage. Airedale Business Centre. Access to A629 and A6131. Many public foot paths. Farms serving the Community. Farm land. Public Footpaths. Farmland. Farmland. Public Footpaths. Farmland. Public Footpath through to College Road. Green Space in front of bungalows. Highly valued green space. Mill lane popular walking area up to High Bradley and beyond. 5. Landscape Value Maintains valley Landscape. Farm Land. Flood Plain. Black Sike Beck, Eller Gill, North Gill and Bradley Gill all flow into Low Bradley from Hillside. Rising land to Bradley Moor. Dry stone walls. Open land as below. Open Land critical to maintain and retain the Green balance of this section of the Conservation area. Open Land critical to maintain and retain the Green balance of the Conservation area. Maintains open aspect to bungalows. Highly valued open space on conservation side of the Lane. Tranquil Middlebeck flows along side Mill Lane. 6. Historical Value Nil. 18th century Farms and Field Barns. Listed properties canal and canal bridge. 19th Century St Mary s Church. College House. Old Hall. Listed Buildings. Methodist Church.Old Hall. Listed Buildings. Nil. Ancient stone trough at junction. Nothing known. 19th century cottages. 7. Recreational Value ABC provides employment business and shopping. Fell walkers. B&B accommodation. Many ancient Public footpaths criss-cross this landscape. Canal Boating. Fishing. Cycling canal path. Entrance to properties. Valued Green Space. Tourists and walkers Public Footpaths. Ancient College Lane track over Moor. Valued Green Space. Public Footpath through to College Road and College Lane track beyond up to Moorside. Recreation space for bungalow dwellers. Walkers and visitor hot spot. 8. Wildlife or Green Infrastructure Value Canal boating. Water birds. Dry Stone walls. Mature trees. Dry stone walls. Classic Dales landscape. Mature trees.wild flowers. Habitat. Open Heath land. Farm Land. Wild flowers. Dry stone walls. Habitat. Mature trees. As below. Wild flowers. Dry stone walls. Habitat.Mature trees. farm land. Wild flowers. Dry stone walls. Habitat. Mature trees. Farm land. Grass. Dry stone walls. Small grazing field. Mature Trees. Wild flowers. Important beck side Habitat. 9. Recommendation Do not designate too extensive Do not designate as Green Space too extensive. Leave as is. Do not designate as Green Space too extensive Designate as Green Space. Designate as Green Space. Right of Way, not primarily greenspace. Do not designate. Designate as Green Space. Designate as Green Space. 42 Neighbourhood Development Plan

40 1. Name/Location Mill Lane. Site No BROO3 and Site No BROO4 Continued. Mill Lane High Bradley Lane leading to High Bradley. High Bradley Hamlet. Skipton Road BROO1 BROO2 2. Size As previously identified. As previously identified. From junction with Mill Lane to High Bradley Hamlet. 1.0 Hectare of tarmac road ribboned with wild flowers, grasses and hedging. Natural end to High Bradley Lane Hectares Track continues across moor. 1.5 Hectares. 3. Adjacent to Existing Properties Brookside. Ghyll House. High Bank. An over developed area of Mill Lane. Ghyll Farm Houses. Mill House. Eller Ghyll House. Ghyll Barn. Prospect Terrace. Longroyds Farm. Wood Nook. Harolds Laithe. Overton Crofts. Greenlands Farm. Several unsympathetic modern farm buildings in fields. Far Fold Barn. M.S.W. Cottage. Old Hall Farm. Honey Pot Cottage. Aireview Farm. Aireview Barn. Far Barn. Moorcroft. Prospect House. Prospect Barn. New Hall Farm. Heath Lea. Holly Tree House. High Bank Cottage. Oak Lea. Ryefield House 4. Local or Community Value As above. Pleasing aspect With Beck and well maintained sensitive garden spaces. Conservation Land. Fell Walking on to Mill Lane rough ancient track over moor. Conservation Land. Essential Access/Egress Low Bradley with High Bradley. Green Lane track. Public footpaths. Interlinked tarmac single tracks. Nothing discerned. 5. Landscape Value Highly valued open space on conservation side of the Lane. Tranquil Bradley Beck flows along side of Mill Lane. Very pleasing balance between buildings and landscape. Well maintained green spaces. Confluence of Eller Ghyll and Bradley Gill. Surrounded by farmland rising landscape. Wonderful views up Bradley Moor to the the Crags and Trees and wild Moor land. Superb landscape viewed over the Aire Valley and high Hills beyond. Dry stone walls. Many dry stone walls. Situated high up on Bradley Moor provides views across the Aire Valley A very highly valued Landscape. Open Meadow. Rising land. Dry stone walls. 6. Historical Value Small Beck Bridge of unknown origin. 18th century converted farm and mill buildings. 19th Century cottages and farm buildings. 18th Century traditional stone dwellings and Farm buildings. Listed mbuildings. Nil. 20th century Stone Barn. 7. Recreational Value As above. Public footpaths. Fell walking. Public footpaths. Walkers. Public footpaths. Walkers. Nil. 8. Wildlife or Green Infrastructure Value As above. Maintained garden spaces balanced with the farm land and landscape. Beck side. Profusion of wild flowers to roadside. Hedging habitat for small birds and vertebrates. Habitat for bats, Swallows, curlews and other heathland birds. A high wild place of mixed pasture and mature trees and hedging proving habitat for small birds and vertebrates. Trees and grass land. Pleasing meadow of wild flowers. Mature trees and hedging. Habitat. 9. Recommendation Designate as Green Space. Designate as Green Space. Primarily a road. Do not designate. Need to apply conservation criteria to this location. Over riding need to preserve settlement setting Do not designate as Green Space too extensive. Designate as Green Space Neighbourhood Development Plan

41 Appendix 5 Housing Engagement Summary Map Key to Housing Engagament Summary Map On the settlement maps, a coloured dot represents a preference expressed or a comment made by an individual with respect to a site. A preferred site for housing. A preferred site for employment. An objection to development of a site. A point of information regarding a site, which may be an issue, a query, a suggestion or an idea. 44 Neighbourhood Development Plan

42 Appendix 6 Site Briefs Policy HOU2 Land adjacent to Cross Lane Mill (partial development of BR006 becomes BB01) BB01 BB01 Key considerations: BB01 (BR006) refers to the land west of Ings Lane and adjacent to Cross Lane Mill. The site is outside the current development limits and is within the conservation area. The site is not located in, adjoining or adjacent to the National Park or Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The gross area of the site is Ha. Neighbourhood Development Plan

43 The site has been previously used for food production and is classified as Grade 3 agricultural land (good to moderate). The Parish Council are not aware of any previous planning applications on this site. There are no community facilities or public open spaces within the site. There are no historical or listed buildings within the site. The sketch scheme provided indicates that a scheme could be achieved which would retain open views of the mill. A footpath through the site would be also of amenity value. Any archaeological interest still needs to be determined. Vehicle access for the site is available from Ings Lane to the east and Ings Drive to the west although road improvements would be required to be agreed with NYCC Highways. Development of the site would require provision of a footpath and street lighting to Ings Lane which would provide benefits in terms of pedestrian safety and pedestrian access to village services and the bus stop on the A629. The landowner has provided a sketch scheme indicating footpath provision. A key consideration is that the majority of the site is in flood zone 3a 1 (high probability of risk of flood). The landowner has provided additional information in response to the site s flood risk putting forward the case that any flooding problems would be de minimus. To confirm the site s potential flood risk, a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) is required. With the exception of the conservation area, there are no known other conservation, ecological or biodiversity issues with the site. There is no known significant infrastructure crossing the site, e. g. power lines or pipe lines. No utility services are available on site. Topographically, the site is mostly flat with channelled and fairly long views in and channelled views out. The site has been highlighted as possibly being in a potential safeguarding area for minerals including sandstone and shallow coal (NYCC Minerals). However, it is quite unlikely that this site will ever be used for mineral extraction. This site is supported by as it is away from the main village and therefore reduces the need for additional village parking and increased traffic flow through the village at peak hours. This site will protect thoroughfares from additional infill development. This site is supported by Craven District Council as positive attributes of this site includes its proximity to Bradley village centre and children s play space. There are potential benefits in terms of footpath provision. Policy HOU2 requirements: New housing development must respond to the open aspect of the site near to the canal entrance to the village; and proximity to existing properties. It should provide new local green spaces and road improvements at the junction of Ings Lane and the A629 to improve safety for all road users. Careful consideration of the site is necessary to take into account the nearby existing mill building. Restricted development of the site could result in some Green space being retained. Potential housing development capacity would be restricted to a small number of properties. A footpath could be included. This site can be accepted with limited development which would maintain some green space. A new footpath could aid pedestrian road safety. Partial development of the site would be prioritised by the Parish Council to maintain open aspect, open space, views of the mill and to reduce flood risk. 46 Neighbourhood Development Plan

44 Policy HOU2 Land at Matthew Lane (partial development of BR007 becomes BB02) BB02 BB02 Key considerations: There are no community facilities or public open spaces within the site. There are no historical or listed buildings within the site. Access onto Mathew Lane is narrow (particularly at the southern end). After approximately 800m there is access to the A629. It is easy to access the south, but access is impeded by a very difficult and dangerous access to the north. A key consideration is that the majority of the site is in flood zone 1 (low probability of risk of flood). Neighbourhood Development Plan

45 There are no known conservation, ecological or biodiversity issues with the site. There is no known significant infrastructure crossing the site, e. g. power lines or pipe lines. No utility services are available on site. There are no trees or hedgerows on the site. Topographically, the site is largely flat with wide views in and out. Concerns include that the access road is narrow and the western end is poorly drained. There is some risk from stray hard balls coming from the adjacent sports field at the eastern end. The site has been highlighted as possibly being in a potential safeguarding area for minerals including sandstone and shallow coal (NYCC Minerals). However, it is quite unlikely that this site will ever be used for mineral extraction. This site is supported by for a development of 7 or 8 residential dwellings. There are some reservations due to issues with access and a potential nuisance from the sports field. The site is supported as it is away from the main village and therefore reduces the need for additional village parking and increased traffic flow through the village at peak hours. The development of this site will protect thoroughfares from additional infill development. This site is supported by Craven District Council as positive attributes include the proximity to Bradley village centre and access to play space and the low flood risk. There are minor negative issues with regards to agricultural land value and uncertainty in terms of the impact on Low Bradley Conservation Area, given the absence of any information to support the scheme in this respect. Policy HOU2 requirements: New housing development must respond to its canal side location, and provide new local green space. The provision of a new pedestrian footpath within the playing field alongside Matthew Lane and road safety improvements at the Junction of Ings Lane and the A629 are requirements of development. The eastern section of the site is proposed for residential development, which would be of a high quality design to match the grain of the existing built up area. The remainder of the site may offer an opportunity for an extension of the existing sports/recreation facilities which is required in the village. The western boundary of the site borders the Leeds to Liverpool canal. The River and Canal Trust was consulted to ascertain whether access for management of the waterway is a requirement. A statement was submitted stating that as western portion of the site will not be developed, access for the Trust should not be an issue. Improvements to Matthew Lane would be required as well as extending the existing footway street lighting to serve the site. (NYCC Highways). A statement has been submitted which claims that Sanderson Associates have inspected the site and reported that it is possible to provide adequate access to the site that will meet highway standards, (see drawing 7722/004 showing proposed access submitted by David Hill). (Note: Southern end of Matthew lane cannot be widened and northern route is currently almost single track in places) Partial development of the site would be prioritised by the Parish Council if road safety was improved around the junction of Ings Lane and the A629, open/green space is provided and a new pedestrian footpath installed. 48 Neighbourhood Development Plan

46 Policy HOU2 Land at Skipton Road (BR016 becomes BB03) BB03 BB03 Key considerations: BB03 (BR016) refers to the land at Gilders, Langholme, and land to the west, Skipton Road. The site is outside both the current development limits and the conservation area. The site is not located in, adjoining or adjacent to the National Park or Forest of Bowland Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The gross area of the site is 1.28 Ha. The site is classified as Grade 3 agricultural land (good to moderate). The land is the subject of an annual grazing tenancy (limited value of 100 per annum per acre). There is no brownfield land within the site. The site appears to have no particular economic development / mixed-use potential. The Parish Council are not aware of any previous planning applications on this site. The site is close to an old quarry site. Neighbourhood Development Plan