A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006

Similar documents
PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

ORANGE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS VAN NUYS NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL, PLUM COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING, CITY OF LOS ANGELES

City Council Presentation November 6, 2017

3.0 URBAN DESIGN. December 6, OVERVIEW

Chapter 4. Linking Land Use with Transportation. Chapter 4

2. Form and Character. 2.1 Introduction. 2.2 The Downtown Addition Plan. 2.1 Introduction

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development

Residential Design Standards Stakeholders Meeting

Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element

AN ORDINANCE THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA HEREBY ORDAINS:

, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918

Why is This Project Needed? Project Schedule and Milestones. Participation and Communication Plan. Issue Identification Exercise

Highland Village Green Design Guidelines

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

Chapter 1.0 Introduction

DRAFT Land Use Chapter

MEMORANDUM. DATE: March 15, Chairman and Members Community Redevelopment Agency. Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. Executive Director

Incentive Zoning Regulations Florida Municipal City of Orlando

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008

Planning Board Briefing

Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. May 15, 2008

Syracuse Land Use & Development Plan A Component of the Comprehensive Plan

September 30, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss Department of Community Development City of San Mateo 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo, CA

WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

Neighborhood Character (Table 1) Fact Sheet & Focus Questions:

Regency Developments. Urban Design Brief. Holyrood DC2 Rezoning

BROADWAY-ARBUTUS POLICIES. Adopted by City Council on July 7, NOTE: To be considered in combination with applicable guidelines

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

(DC1) Direct Development Control Provision DC1 Area 4

Appendix C: Interim Mixed-Use Evaluation Criteria

Planned Residential Neighborhoods Land Use Goals

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18 ZONING SECTION 20A NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL - NMD

REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF REGIONAL LAND USE

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF REPORT

4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES

Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan

September 25th, 2018 $2000 fee pd CC

Lynn Housing Authority and Neighborhood Development. Washington Street Gateway District Plan A p r i l

City of Portland Comprehensive Plan. May 2016

Future Land Use SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission

New Town Mixed Use District

Recommendations Affecting the University Heights Neighborhood that Overlap Both the Uptown and North Park Community Planning Areas

Future Land Use and Transportation

The broad range of permitted and special uses allowed in the district remain, but some descriptions have been clarified.

Allen Street Civic District Redevelopment Area Plan Redevelopment Plan & Proposal State College Planning Commission State College Redevelopment

Gruene River Place PDD CONCEPT PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

NEC of Central Avenue and Indian School Road

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

Mobility Districts and Traffic Studies

Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021

[PLANNING RATIONALE] For Site Plan Control and Lifting of Holding Zone By-Law 101 Champagne Avenue. May 23, 2014

Developer s Program. The Station at East 54

TO: Denver Planning Board FROM: Analiese Hock, Senior City Planner DATE: March 13, 2018 RE:

A. WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?

Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project

The scale of intervention:

The transportation and land use connection

Section 3: Land Use M C H E N R Y K A N E. Figure 3.1: Potential Future Municipal Boundaries. Future Municipal Boundaries. County Land Use Plans

4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 7. LAND USE AND PLANNING

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 18, 2016

Aloha Tomorrow Study (2017)

LEED-ND 101: Practical Strategies for Achieving Sustainability Goals. Travis Parker Lakewood Planning Director

Planning & Zoning Commission Staff Report

PINE CURVE REZONING. Property does not meet criteria for open space preservation and is not a candidate for a park

City of Woodinville Planning Commission Study Session. Development Regulations 101: An Overview of Specific Regulatory Items To Help You in 2012

Steering Committee Meeting

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PINELLAS COUNTY MPO LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INITIATIVE PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS

DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM

VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use

Mid-Rise Buildings on Toronto s Avenues Responding to the Public Realm Andrea Oppedisano, City of Toronto

St. Kevin s Area Planning Collaborative

MIXED-USE ZONING DISTRICT DESIGN GUIDELINES

RIVERSIDE DESIGN CD-1 GUIDELINES. Adopted by City Council August 9, 1983

SYRINGA VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN NARRATIVE

Subject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park

Bay Meadows Specific Plan Amendment - Phase II Overview. I. Phase II Overview. November 7, 2005 I - 1

North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM

TUSTIN RED HILL DEVELOPMENT TUSTIN CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP

Design Guidelines. Gardnerville Plan for Prosperity

Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee

International Blvd. TOD Plan Public Workshop #1

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

Infill Residential Design Guidelines

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

WELCOME and introduction

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS DCA#11-1AR

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville

Fisherman s Wharf Residential and R&D RAFT. Town of Jupiter Planning and Zoning Commission March 14, 2017

PINE CURVE REZONING. BACKGROUND Purchased as two parcels in 2001 and 2002

Official Zoning Map Amendment Application #2018I-00047

V. Urban Design A. INTRODUCTION B. CITY IMAGE

Zoning Technical Review Presented by Camiros. November 10, 2015

12600 S Existing Conditions

Listening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware

Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N

Silver Line CPAM UPDATE. Transportation and Land Use Committee October 14, 2016

Transcription:

A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006

Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Project Overview City of Palo Alto

Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Project Overview City of Palo Alto Population: 58,000 Between San Francisco and San Jose Adjacent to Stanford University Silicon Valley: high-tech focus Vibrant downtown (University Avenue) Attractive but expensive housing Pedestrian and bicycle friendly Two transit (commuter train) stations Virtually built out

Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Project Overview Zoning Ordinance Update Initiated in 2002 Van Meter Williams Pollack and Kevin Gardiner & Associates of San Francisco, and Urbsworks of Portland, OR Emphasis on form-based zoning (later rechristened context-based design ) Pedestrian designation added to Transit Oriented

Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Comprehensive Plan Mandate Comprehensive Plan Mandates ISSUES: Transit-Oriented Zoning to serve existing transit Form-Based Zoning to be included in update of Zoning Ordinance

Zoning Ordinance Update. Pedestrian/Transit Oriented Development (PTOD) Issues Papers Transit Oriented Development Mixed Use Floor Area Ratio Compatibility View Corridors Sustainability Parking Design

Zoning Ordinance Update. Pedestrian/Transit Oriented Development (PTOD) Virtual Tour - Local References Reference Lists and Project Sheets Project Sheets

Zoning Ordinance Update. Pedestrian/Transit Oriented Development (PTOD)

California Avenue Overlay District Impetus: City Council changes existing zoning to push along PTOD; two Housing Element sites with active development applications effected

California Avenue Overlay District Aerial of California Avenue District

California Avenue Overlay District California Avenue District PTOD Overlay Zone 2,000 ft radius 15 minute walk

California Avenue Overlay District California Avenue District PTOD Overlay Zone Area: 84 acres Land Use Mix: 2,000 ft radius Commercial 19.9% Residential 18.1% Indust/General Manufacturing 23.3% 15 minute walk Mixed Uses & PC s 27.9% Public 10.8%

California Avenue Overlay District California Avenue District PTOD Overlay Zone Range of parcel sizes: 2,000 ft radius from 5,000 sq ft to 10+ acres No vacant parcels Infill: not a redevelopment Elective overlay - may select either existing zoning or PTOD 15 minute walk

Ordinance Features A hybrid - form-code elements combined with more conventional elements

Ordinance Features A hybrid - form-code elements combined with more conventional elements

Development Standards Emphasis on: Pedestrian environment Mix of uses Range of housing types Incorporates: Architectural Review Board design criteria Standards from other newly adopted zoning, including area plans

Neighborhood Concerns 3 1 2

Neighborhood Concerns Responses: Small-Group Meetings Additional Analyses and Studies Relevant Feedback

Neighborhood Concerns

Neighborhood Concerns 1 Neighborhood #1: Concerns that new development will restrict views, be unattractive, invade privacy, amplify train noise

Site Sections Section A Section B Conceptual building

Site Sections Section C Section D Conceptual building

Context Based Design: Simulations

Context Based Design: Simulations

Context Based Design: Step V Railroad Adjacency

Neighborhood Concerns FRY S SITE Neighborhood #2: Concerns that high density development will decrease property values and lower standard of living 2

Context Based Design: Step V Examples

Context Based Design: Step V Examples

Context Based Design: Step V Examples

Context-Based Design: Step V Examples

Neighborhood Concerns 3 Neighborhood #3: Concerns about traffic, parking supply and policy, and project design

Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Pedestrian Transit Oriented Development (PTOD) Since Adoption Ordinance adopted September 2006 Pipeline projects have been able to use new zoning standards A toolbox - some standards have been applied to other more general zones, such as Mixed Use

More Information Code summary at: www.kevingardiner.com City of Palo Alto PTOD website: http://www.city.palo-alto.ca.us/ planning-community/ptod.html

QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION

Development Standards Max Dwelling Units: 40 DU/AC (50 DU/AC w/ BMR Bonus) Max FAR: 100% Residential 1.0:1 (1.5:1 w/ BMR Bonus) Mixed-Use 1.25:1 (1.5:1 w/ BMR Bonus) Mixed-Use non-residential cap 0.35 Height: 40 (50 w/ BMR Bonus) Adjacencies to R-1 and R-2: Side yard setback - 6 (R-2) 8 (R-1) Side yard daylight plane - 45 deg @ 10 height Rear setback - 20 Rear daylight plane - 45 deg @ 16 Standards 1 Max Dwelling Units: Max FAR: 100% Residential FAR Mixed Use FAR Mixed Use Non- Residential FAR Cap PTOD Ğ California Ave 40 DU/AC 50 DU/AC with bonus BMR 2 1.0:1 1.5:1 w/bonus BMR 2 1.25:1 3 1.5 w/bonus BMR 2 0.35 4 Hotels 2.0 Height: 40Õ (50Õw/ bonus BMR 2 ) Open Space Minimum area required Minimum dimensions Parking: Parking Adjustments: Setbacks and daylight plane requirements for properties adjacent to R-1 and R-2 zones: Setbacks Daylight Plane 5 or less units: 200 s.f. per unit 6 or more units: 100 s.f. per unit Private open space: 6 feet Common open space: 12 feet Rates established by use, per Section 18.83.050 See Section 18.66.040 (d) On portion of site that abuts: 1. Interior side yard: 6 feet/8 feet 5 2. Rear yard: 20 feet On portion of site that abuts: 1. Interior side yard: a. Initial height at interior side lot line: 10 feet b. Angle (degrees): 45 2. Rear yard: a. Initial height at rear setback line: 16 feet b. Angle (Degrees): 45

Context Based Design Criteria Considerations and Findings 1. Pedestrian Environment - promote walkability and connectivity. 2. Street Building Facades - promote a strong relationship with sidewalk and street. 3. Massing and Articulation - minimize massing and provide articulation. 4. Low-Density Residential Transitions - respect scale and privacy of adjacent properties. 5. Project Open Space - provide usable open space. 6. Parking Design - Parking design should not overwhelm character of building. 7. Large (multi-acre) Sites - building patterns consistent with surrounding neighborhood. 8. Sustainability - sustainability and green building design should be incorporated 9. Historic Preservation