Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (Ksat), Standard Classes
|
|
- Edith Sanders
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to , frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, to 3 20A Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to D Howard soils, 15 to A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to A Collamer silt loam, 0 to B Collamer silt loam, 3 to C Collamer silt loam, 8 to D Collamer silt loam, 15 to A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to A Odessa silt loam, 0 to B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to Page 1 of 7
2 name 36A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to A Niagara silt loam, 0 to B Niagara silt loam, 3 to A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to A Lyons soils, 0 to A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to Page 2 of 7
3 name 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to A Darien silt loam, 0 to B Darien silt loam, 3 to C Darien silt loam, 8 to A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to B Gretor silt loam, 3 to C Gretor silt loam, 8 to D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to B Orpark silt loam, 3 to C Orpark silt loam, 8 to D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to A Palms muck, 0 to A Carlisle muck, 0 to A Edwards muck, 0 to A Martisco muck, 0 to A Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated A Honeoye loam, 0 to B Honeoye loam, 3 to C Honeoye loam, 8 to D Honeoye loam, 15 to E Honeoye loam, 25 to A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to C Lansing loam, 8 to D Lansing loam, 15 to E Lansing loam, 25 to B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to Page 3 of 7
4 name 114B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to B Ontario loam, 3 to C Ontario loam, 8 to D Ontario loam, 15 to F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to A Farmington loam, 0 to B Farmington loam, 3 to A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky A Camillus silt loam, 0 to B Camillus silt loam, 3 to C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25, very stony Page 4 of 7
5 name 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to , extremely stony 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to , extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to B Norchip silt loam, 3 to B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to A Lima loam, 0 to B Lima loam, 3 to C Lima loam, 8 to A Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface B Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to B Aurora silt loam, 3 to C Aurora silt loam, 8 to D Aurora silt loam, 15 to B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to A Kendaia loam, 0 to B Kendaia loam, 3 to A Angola silt loam, 0 to A Ovid silt loam, 0 to B Ovid silt loam, 3 to B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to PG Pits, gravel and sand 75 PQ Pits, quarry 80 Page 5 of 7
6 Map name W Water Page 6 of 7
7 Options Attribute Name: Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) refers to the ease with which pores in a saturated soil transmit water. The estimates are expressed in terms of micrometers per second. They are based on soil characteristics observed in the field, particularly structure, porosity, and texture. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is considered in the design of soil drainage systems and septic tank absorption fields. For each soil layer, this attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. The numeric Ksat values have been grouped according to standard Ksat class limits. The classes are: Very low: 0.00 to 0.01 Low: 0.01 to 0.1 Moderately low: 0.1 to 1.0 Moderately high: 1 to 10 High: 10 to 100 Very high: 100 to 705 Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Component" returns the attribute value associated with the component with the highest composition in the map unit. If more than one component shares the highest composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher attribute value should be returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method may or may not represent the dominant condition throughout the map unit. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. This option indicates that a null value for a component should be converted to zero before aggregation occurs. This will be done only if a map unit has at least one component where this value is not null. Page 7 of 7
Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 10.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 44.1 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 45.4 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3
More informationDepth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer
1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 12D 13F 14D 15A 15B 16A 16B 16C 18A 19A 20A 24A 24B 24C 24D 25A 25B 25C 25D 25E 26B 27B 31A 31B 31C 31D 32A 32B 33A 33B 33C 33D 33E 34A 35A 35B Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently
More informationLinear Extensibility
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 1.5 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 1.5
More informationDepth to Any Soil Restrictive Layer
1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,
More informationCation-Exchange Capacity (CEC-7)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 4.5 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 9.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 11.9 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 14.3
More informationLiquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 19.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 31.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 37.3 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3
More informationSurface Texture. Layer Option: Surface Layer Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Lower
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Gravelly loam 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Silty clay loam 100 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Silty clay loam 100 4A Naples
More informationSodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 0.0 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0
More informationPercent Clay. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 5.3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 19.7 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 25.3 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3
More informationElectrical Conductivity (EC)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 0.0 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 0.0
More informationDrainage Class. Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Tie-break Rule: Higher. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016
unit name unit 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Poorly drained 55, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Well drained 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Moderately well drained
More informationK Factor, Whole Soil
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3.10 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3.49 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3.43 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3.43 90
More informationRange Production (Unfavorable Year)
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,
More informationEffective Cation-Exchange Capacity (ECEC)
1A 2A 3A 4A name Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 5A Wayland soils complex,
More informationFarmland Classification
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Not prime farmland 100, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas are prime farmland 100 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 All areas
More informationHydrologic Soil Group
name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 A/D 85, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 C 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 C/D 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3 B/D
More informationPotential for Seedling Mortality
1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons High Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
More informationErosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)
1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, frequently flooded reasons Slight Fluvaquents, frequently flooded 45% Udifluvents, frequently flooded 40% Wayland 10% Naples Creek 5% 2A Geneseo
More informationSoil Taxonomy Classification
1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 Mixed, mesic Fluvaquents 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 Fine-silty, mixed, active, mesic Oxyaquic Eutrudepts 3A Hemlock silty clay
More informationOneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand
Oneida County Soil Survey ID Number Name Slope/Descriptor 55A Adams Loamy Sand 0-3% slopes 55B Adams Loamy Sand 3-8% slopes 55C Adams Loamy Sand 8-15% slopes 55D Adams Loamy Sand 15-25% slopes 55E Adams
More informationAny County, New York. Custom Soil Resource Report for. Homer Vegetable Research Farm. United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Tompkins County, New York
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Ulster County, New York
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationThis section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area.
Section 3.1: Land Resources A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the geologic, soil, and topographic conditions of the Nation s four properties and immediately surrounding area. B. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
More information108 40' 29'' W Soil Map Mesa County Area, Colorado 108 36' 55'' W 39 10' 11'' N 39 6' 31'' N 4331700 4332500 4333300 4334100 4334900 4335700 4336500 4337300 4338100 701100 701900 702700 703500 704300 705100
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSOIL DATA: Avondale. in Allen, TX. This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas.
SOIL DATA: Avondale in Allen, TX This information was taken from NRCS web soil survey of Collin County, Texas. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Texas
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for State of Connecticut
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More information2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY
2016 Area 3 Envirothon Muskingum County Soils Test ANSWER KEY 1. The majority of the bedrock in Muskingum County is. a. sedimentary bedrock b. glacial bedrock c. igneous bedrock d. metamorphic bedrock
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, New York, and Sussex County, New Jersey
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSeptember 20, 2016 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana
September 20, 201 Soils Investigation for Agricultural Designation Windemere Place, Missoula County, Montana The purpose of this report is to compare on-site soils of the proposed subdivision with the
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Craighead County, Arkansas
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Columbia County, New York
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationNRCS Soils Report. Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station. OA Project No
NRCS Soils Report Grand River Gathering LLC K28E Compressor Station OA Project No. 012-032 82 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 90.23.800 FAX 90.23.45 United States Department of Agriculture A product
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report Soil Map
77 11' 22'' W Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 77 9' 43'' W 36 48' 13'' N 304700 304900 305100 305300 305500 305700 305900 306100 306300 306500 306700 306900 307100 36 48' 13'' N 36 47' 21'' N 4073800
More informationSection 1. Judging the soil pit (questions 1-4)
CONNECTICUT ENVIROTHON 2009 SOILS QUESTIONS Please select the best response to the following questions. There are 25 questions; each question is worth 4 points. Section 1. Judging the soil pit (questions
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Orange County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil types of lake county
Soil types of lake county Ad Adrian muck This deep, level, very poorly drained organic soil is in depressional areas on the lake plain. It is subject to frequent flooding. Slope is generally less than
More informationArea 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key
Area 3 Envirothon Soils Questions Key 1. Soil aeration is the exchange of air in soil with air from the atmosphere. When a soil is well aerated, the air within the soil is very similar to the atmosphere
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationBENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016
BENNING ROAD & BRIDGES TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS NRCS SOIL RESOURCE REPORT DRAFT MAY 2016 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative
More informationSurvey of Texas Vineyard Soils
Survey of Texas Vineyard Soils Characteristics and Challenges Ed Hellman Professor of Viticulture Bachelor of Science in Plant and Soil Science Degree Concentrations: Viticulture and Enology Local Food
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Polk County, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationNRCS Soils Report. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well. OA Project No
NRCS Soils Report Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. C19 Injection Well OA Project No. 012-0178 826 21 ½ Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 TEL 970.263.7800 FAX 970.263.7456 United States Department of Agriculture
More informationSoils and Land Use Test
SOIL PROPERTIES Total Score /50 1) List two of the five main functions of soil. (2 points) Habitat for organisms, Engineering medium, Filters and stores water, Anchor for plants, Cycles nutrients 2) Small
More informationSoil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management
Section C Soil characteristics that influence nitrogen and water management Soil characteristics vary across the landscape Soils vary from one field to another, and often within the same field. Soil differences
More informationSoil testing Page 1. Contrary to what is widely believed, the colour of the soil reveals very little about its fertility.
Soil testing Page 1 Soil The Basics Soil is the uppermost surface of the earth, which has been slowly transformed by decomposition due to the effects of weather, vegetation and human activities. The parent
More information2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam
2011 Wisconsin Envirothon Soils and Land Use Exam USE THE OCONTO COUNTY SOIL SURVEY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS 1-4 The Pensaukee River Wetland Complex is a mixture of state (Pensaukee Wildlife Area) and privately
More informationASCE - Philadelphia. Soils & Stormwater Management. Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist. Gilmore & Associates, Inc.
ASCE - Philadelphia Soils & Stormwater Management Matthew C. Hostrander, CPSS, SEO Soil Scientist Gilmore & Associates, Inc. Course Overview COURSE OUTLINE Soil Science Fundamentals Discuss United States
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationAPPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS
APPENDIX A SOIL RESOURCES REPORTS United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department
More informationEXAMPLE Point A: Sandy Loam: 65% Sand _ 20% Silt _ 15% Clay. Point B: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point C: %Sand % Silt % Clay. Point D: %Sand % Silt % Clay
SOIL TEXTURE Refers to proportions of sand, silt and clay size particles. These proportions determine water infiltration rates, permeability rates, and water holding rates. Using a soil texture triangle.
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Pope County, Illinois
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Hancock County Area, Maine
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Gallia County, Ohio
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSOIL SEPARATES. Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/2018. Soil Texture, Page 1 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE
Soil Evaluator Day 2, Presentation 3-3/27/18 TITLE 5 SOIL EVALUATOR CERTIFICATION TRAINING SOIL TEXTURE Prepared for: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection By L.A. Spokas,
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Kane County, Illinois
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationLesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops
Lesson 1: Recognizing the Characteristics of Soils and the Soil Requirements for Fruit and Nut Crops 1 Mineral matter Organic matter Pore spaces Tilth Hygroscopic water Soil aeration 22 I. Soil is a layer
More informationSoils and their Relationship with Agriculture
Soils and their Relationship with Agriculture Presentation created by Thomas Gallagher Modified by Hank Bignell Capital Area Agriculture and Horticulture Program Cornell University Cooperative Extension
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Lane County Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationHomework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture
Homework Activity Jar Test for Soil Texture Background: 1. What is soil? 2. What natural factors influence the formation of soil? 3. How will the depth of each horizon in your soil profile affect your
More informationSubmittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report
Submittal Document II.I. USDA NRCS Soil Resources Report United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort
More informationURBAN SOILS & SEATTLE EXAMPLES
Class Results - Mystery Soil #1 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sandy Clay Loam Sandy Loam Silty Loam Class Results - Mystery Soil #2 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Silty Clay Clay Loam Sandy Sandy Silty Sandy Silty Loamy Loam Clay
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Franklin County, Washington
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Yamhill Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Cibola Area, New Mexico, Parts of Cibola, McKinley, and Valencia Counties
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Hinds County, Mississippi
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationSoil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil.
Soils Soil Texture = %Sand, Silt & Clay in a soil. Soil texture is the single most important physical property of the soil. Knowing the soil texture alone will provide information about: 1) water flow
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Daviess County, Missouri
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Centre County, Pennsylvania
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationLesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil
Lesson 1: Identifying Texture in Soil 1 Clods Loam Peds Permeability Soil structure Soil texture Soil workability Textural triangle Water-holding capacity 2 I. A. Soil texture is the fineness or coarseness
More informationScheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops. Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist Greene County
Scheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist Greene County Outline Soil characteristics Soil water characteristics Basic watering facts Scheduling irrigation
More informationScheduling Irrigation for Horticultural Crops
for Horticultural Crops Patrick Byers Regional Horticulture Specialist Greene County Outline Soil characteristics Soil water characteristics Basic watering facts Scheduling irrigation What is Soil? Soil
More informationa. OVERALL PROFILE DEPTH: Assess the depth to the first restrictive layer, which can be a tree root, a rock or an
OBSERVING SOIL PROCEDURE Using a shovel, soil probe, or soil auger, collect a soil profile. (Go as deep as you can with the equipment). Arrange the soil you remove from the ground on newspaper or in a
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and McCurtain County, Oklahoma
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationTopoclimate Southland Soil Technical Data Sheet No Waiau
This Technical Data Sheet describes the typical average properties of the specified soil. It is essentially a summary of information obtained from one or more profiles of this soil that were examined and
More informationHorner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types
Horner-McLaughlin Woods: Soil Types Not present at HMW Adrian Muck Conover Loam 0-4% Slopes Houghton Muck Miami Loam 2-6% Slopes Miami Loam 6-12% Slopes Miami Loam 12-18% Slopes t 0 0.125 0.25 Miles Mary
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Clark County, Missouri
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Alsea Area, Oregon, and Lincoln County Area, Oregon
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationLand Capability Classifications
Land Capability Classifications Unit: Soil Science Problem Area: Basic Principles of Soil Science Student Learning Objectives. Instruction in this lesson should result in students achieving the following
More informationRaC. RaD GlG. GlF. RaD GlE. CeA. RaE. RcD. GoF. GoF SkC. SkD. CfA. AdA. GoF. GoF. GoF. RcD. GgD. GoF. RaE GlE. RaE DbF. GoF. DbE. RaC.
526300 527400 528500 529600 530700 531800 532900 534000 535100 4240200 4241300 4242400 4243500 4244600 4245700 ADRIAN DR FAIRWAY DR STATE FARM DR DOLORES DR HUDIS ST SANTA ALICIA DR Cotati PAGE ST ALTA
More informationTP73 4PTP101 TP45 TP9 TP74 TP46 TP47 TP115 TP48 TP32 TP5 TP31 TP22 TP49 V58 TP57 4F TP50 TP51 3PD 3PD TP80 TP28 TP55
Figure 2.1-3 - Capability Assessment Map Part of Lots 18 and 19, Concession 3 Township of Russell sified unclas TP72 TP90 TP624P V18 3D TP35 TP73 4PTP101 3D TP45 TP9 TP74 TP89 TP117 V61 V34 TP19 TP20 TP100
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Kent County, Maryland
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Hamilton County, Texas
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationPHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON
PHYSICAL CHAtlACTERISTICS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED SAND AND GRAVEL SITE AT MANOR FARM, UFFINGTON Introduction Following the" request for detailed information on the physical characteristics of soil at Manor
More informationDO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11)
DO YOU KNOW YOUR SOILS? (Rev. 10/11) Circle all the correct answers. 1. What is the layer normally present on the surface of the soil in cropped fields? a. O c. Ap e. B g. R b. A d. E f. C 2. Available
More informationHORT 102: Soil Properties. Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15. [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide
HORT 102: Soil Properties Cultivated Plants: Lecture 15 [Teresa Koenig] Slide #: 1 Slide Title: Intro Information Slide Title: Lecture 15 Soil Properties Speaker: Teresa Koenig Created by: Teresa Koenig,
More informationList of Equipment, Tools, Supplies, and Facilities:
Unit C: Traits of Soil Lesson 2: Calculating Density of Soil Student Learning Objectives: Instruction in this lesson should result in the students achieving the following objectives: 1. Understand the
More informationCustom Soil Resource Report for Payne County, Oklahoma
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other
More informationLane County Land Management Division
Lane County Land Management Division Prepared by Lane County Soil Ratings for Forestry The Lane County Land Management Division, with technical assistance from the Lane Council of Governments, compiled
More informationSoil Structure, Density, and Porosity. Laboratory #4
Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity Laboratory #4 Objectives Understand the concept of soil structure and how it differs from soil texture. Understand how soil structure influences other soil properties.
More informationAlternative Crop Suitability Methodology
Alternative Crop Suitability Methodology The Alternative Agriculture in Missouri Hub on Community Commons includes model-based ratings of natural suitability for selected alternative crops. These ratings
More informationSTATEMENT OF PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION WITTON PARK, COUNTY DURHAM PROPOSED QUARRY EXTENSION DECEMBER 1992
More information
AGRONOMY NOTES. Vol. 29, No. 5, 1996
AGRONOMY NOTES Vol. 29, No. 5, 1996 Differential Black Walnut Growth on a Recommended Soil Map Unit: Investigation of Related Soil Chemical and Physical Properties D.C. Ditsch, J. Stringer and D. McIntosh
More informationSoil Science Curriculum
Soil Science Curriculum Content and lab derived from the USDA-NRCS Guides for Educators. Go to www.nrcs.usda.gov/soils for the Guides and additional pictures and diagrams. This lesson plan was adapted
More information1 Describe the concept of soil texture and its importance. 2 Determine the texture of a soil sample.
Interest Approach Provide students with various samples of soil. One sample should be nearly all sand, one nearly all clay, and one nearly all silt. Ask students to determine how the samples differ. Would
More informationBell Ringer. d) Erosion e) Decomposition of organic compounds
Bell Ringer 1) A rock exposed to high winds, over a long period of time, loses half of its original size. This is an example of a) Physical weathering b) Chemical weathering c) Biological weathering d)
More information~ NRCS. Custom Soil Resource Report for Rifle Area, Colorado, Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties. USDA United States ~ Department of Agriculture
USA United States ~ epartment of Agriculture ~ NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States epartment of Agriculture
More informationGeology, Soils, and Topography October 13, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION. 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, MITIGATION Geology, Soils, and Topography 3.1 Geology, Soils, and Topography 3.1.1 Existing Conditions Geology The project site is underlain by sedimentary rocks of
More information