Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Liquid Limit. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016"

Adelia Montgomery
5 years ago
Views:

name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 19.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 31.4 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 37.

1 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to , frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to A Wayland soils complex, 0 to 3, frequently flooded 12D Rockrift channery silt loam, 15 to F Rock outcrop-arnot complex, 25 to D Cadosia channery silt loam, 15 to A Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 0 to B Guyanoga channery silt loam, fan, 3 to A Almond channery silt loam, 0 to B Almond channery silt loam, 3 to C Almond channery silt loam, 8 to A Homer fine sandy loam, 0 to A Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, to 3 20A Atherton and Fine-loamy, mixed, active, mesic, Typic Argiaquolls, 0 to 3 24A Howard gravelly loam, 0 to B Howard gravelly loam, 3 to C Howard gravelly loam, 8 to D Howard soils, 15 to A Chenango gravelly loam, 0 to B Chenango gravelly loam, 3 to C Chenango gravelly loam, 8 to D Chenango gravelly loam, 15 to E Chenango gravelly loam, 25 to B Chenango channery loam, fan, 3 to B Castile gravelly silt loam, 3 to A Collamer silt loam, 0 to B Collamer silt loam, 3 to C Collamer silt loam, 8 to D Collamer silt loam, 15 to A Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 0 to B Dunkirk fine sandy loam, 3 to A Dunkirk silt loam, 0 to B Dunkirk silt loam, 3 to C Dunkirk silt loam, 8 to D Dunkirk silt loam, 15 to E Dunkirk silt loam, 25 to A Lakemont silty clay loam, 0 to A Odessa silt loam, 0 to B Odessa silty clay loam, 3 to Page 1 of 7

2 name 36A Schoharie silty clay loam, 0 to B Schoharie silty clay loam, 3 to C Schoharie silty clay loam, 8 to D Schoharie silty clay loam, 15 to E Schoharie silty clay loam, 25 to A Schoharie silt loam, 0 to B Schoharie silt loam, 3 to A Niagara silt loam, 0 to B Niagara silt loam, 3 to A Rhinebeck silty clay loam, 0 to A Aeric Epiaquepts, 0 to A Canandaigua silt loam, 0 to A Canandaigua mucky silt loam, 0 to A Fonda mucky silt loam, 0 to A Galen fine sandy loam, 0 to B Galen fine sandy loam, 3 to A Arkport fine sandy loam, 0 to B Arkport fine sandy loam, 3 to C Arkport fine sandy loam, 8 to D Arkport fine sandy loam, 15 to B Arkport loamy fine sand, 3 to D Arkport loamy fine sand, 15 to E Arkport loamy fine sand, 25 to F Arkport loamy fine sand, 35 to B Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 3 to C Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 8 to D Dunkirk-Arkport complex, 15 to A Lamson fine sandy loam, 0 to A Lamson mucky fine sandy loam, 0 to A Elnora loamy fine sand, 0 to B Colonie loamy fine sand, 3 to C Colonie loamy fine sand, 8 to B Mardin channery silt loam, 3 to C Mardin channery silt loam, 8 to D Mardin channery silt loam, 15 to E Mardin channery silt loam, 25 to B Langford channery silt loam, 3 to C Langford channery silt loam, 8 to 15 pecent D Langford channery silt loam, 15 to B Langford-Erie channery silt loams, 3 to A Lyons soils, 0 to A Volusia channery silt loam, 0 to B Volusia channery silt loam, 3 to Page 2 of 7

3 name 68C Volusia channery silt loam, 8 to D Volusia channery silt loam, 15 to A Erie channery silt loam, 0 to B Erie channery silt loam, 3 to C Erie channery silt loam, 8 to A Darien silt loam, 0 to B Darien silt loam, 3 to C Darien silt loam, 8 to A Darien-Ilion silt loams, 0 to B Darien-Ilion silt loams, 3 to B Gretor silt loam, 3 to C Gretor silt loam, 8 to D Gretor channery silt loam, 15 to B Orpark silt loam, 3 to C Orpark silt loam, 8 to D Orpark channery silt loam, 15 to A Chippewa silt loam, 0 to B Chippewa silt loam, 3 to B Manlius channery silt loam, 3 to C Manlius channery silt loam, 8 to D Manlius channery silt loam, 15 to A Palms muck, 0 to A Carlisle muck, 0 to A Edwards muck, 0 to A Martisco muck, 0 to A Saprists, 0 to 3, inundated A Honeoye loam, 0 to B Honeoye loam, 3 to C Honeoye loam, 8 to D Honeoye loam, 15 to E Honeoye loam, 25 to A Honeoye loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface 104B Honeoye loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface 104C Honeoye loam, 8 to 15, lower clay surface 106B Danley-Lansing complex, 3 to B Conesus-Lansing complex, 3 to C Lansing loam, 8 to D Lansing loam, 15 to E Lansing loam, 25 to B Ontario fine sandy loam, 3 to C Ontario fine sandy loam, 8 to D Ontario fine sandy loam, 15 to E Ontario fine sandy loam, 25 to Page 3 of 7

4 name 114B Ontario gravelly loam, 3 to C Ontario gravelly loam, 8 to D Ontario gravelly loam, 15 to B Ontario loam, 3 to C Ontario loam, 8 to D Ontario loam, 15 to F Ontario, Honeoye, and Lansing soils, 35 to E Palmyra and Howard soils, 25 to A Palmyra cobbly loam, 0 to B Palmyra cobbly loam, 3 to A Palmyra fine sandy loam, 0 to B Palmyra fine sandy loam, 3 to A Palmyra gravelly loam, 0 to B Palmyra gravelly loam, 3 to C Palmyra gravelly loam, 8 to D Palmyra gravelly loam, 15 to A Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 0 to B Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 3 to C Palmyra gravelly sandy loam, 8 to A Farmington loam, 0 to B Farmington loam, 3 to A Galoo loam, 0 to 3, rocky B Galoo loam, 3 to 8, rocky A Camillus silt loam, 0 to B Camillus silt loam, 3 to C Willdin-Norchip complex, 3 to B Valois gravelly loam, 3 to C Valois gravelly loam, 8 to D Valois gravelly loam, 15 to E Valois gravelly loam, 25 to B Valois gravelly loam, cool, 3 to C Valois gravelly loam, cool, 8 to D Valois gravelly loam, cool, 15 to E Valois gravelly loam, cool, 25 to B Willdin channery silt loam, 3 to C Willdin channery silt loam, 8 to D Willdin channery silt loam, 15 to A Ontusia channery silt loam, 0 to B Ontusia channery silt loam, 3 to C Ontusia channery silt loam, 8 to D Ontusia channery silt loam, 15 to C Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 8 to D Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 15 to 25, very stony Page 4 of 7

5 name 171E Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 25 to , extremely stony 171F Lordstown-Manlius-Towerville complex, 35 to , extremely stony 177A Norchip silt loam, 0 to B Norchip silt loam, 3 to B Mongaup-Ischua complex, 3 to C Mongaup-Ischua complex, 8 to D Mongaup-Ischua complex, 15 to 25, very stony 181E Mongaup-Ischua complex, 25 to 35, extremely stony 182B Mongaup channery loam, 3 to C Mongaup channery loam, 8 to A Lima loam, 0 to B Lima loam, 3 to C Lima loam, 8 to A Lima loam, 0 to 3, lower clay surface B Lima loam, 3 to 8, lower clay surface A Phelps gravelly silt loam, 0 to B Phelps gravelly silt loam, 3 to A Nuhi silt loam, 0 to B Aurora-Angola silt loams, 3 to C Aurora-Angola silt loams, 8 to D Aurora-Angola silt loams, 15 to B Aurora silt loam, 3 to C Aurora silt loam, 8 to D Aurora silt loam, 15 to B Cazenovia silt loam, 3 to C Cazenovia silt loam, 8 to D Cazenovia silt loam, 15 to B Cayuga silt loam, 3 to C Cayuga silt loam, 8 to D Cayuga silt loam, 15 to A Kendaia loam, 0 to B Kendaia loam, 3 to A Angola silt loam, 0 to A Ovid silt loam, 0 to B Ovid silt loam, 3 to B Ovid silty clay loam, 3 to C Ovid silty clay loam, 8 to A Udorthents, loamy, 0 to D Udorthents, refuse substratum. 0 to PG Pits, gravel and sand 75 PQ Pits, quarry 80 Page 5 of 7

6 Map name W Water Page 6 of 7

7 Options Attribute Name: Liquid limit (LL) is one of the standard Atterberg limits used to indicate the plasticity characteristics of a soil. It is the water content, on a by weight basis, of the soil (passing #40 sieve) at which the soil changes from a plastic to a liquid state. Generally, the amount of clay- and silt-size particles, the organic matter content, and the type of minerals determine the liquid limit. Soils that have a high liquid limit have the capacity to hold a lot of water while maintaining a plastic or semisolid state. Liquid limit is used in classifying soils in the Unified and AASHTO classification systems. For each soil layer, this attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A "representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used. Aggregation is the process by which a set of component attribute values is reduced to a single value to represent the map unit as a whole. A map unit is typically composed of one or more "components". A component is either some type of soil or some nonsoil entity, e.g., rock outcrop. The components in the map unit name represent the major soils within a map unit delineation. Minor components make up the balance of the map unit. Great differences in soil properties can occur between map unit components and within short distances. Minor components may be very different from the major components. Such differences could significantly affect use and management of the map unit. Minor components may or may not be documented in the database. The results of aggregation do not reflect the presence or absence of limitations of the components which are not listed in the database. An on-site investigation is required to identify the location of individual map unit components. For each of a map unit's components, a corresponding composition is recorded. A composition of 60 indicates that the corresponding component typically makes up approximately 60% of the map unit. Percent composition is a critical factor in some, but not all, aggregation methods. For the attribute being aggregated, the first step of the aggregation process is to derive one attribute value for each of a map unit's components. From this set of component attributes, the next step of the aggregation process derives a single value that represents the map unit as a whole. Once a single value for each map unit is derived, a thematic map for soil map units can be generated. Aggregation must be done because, on any soil map, map units are delineated but components are not. The aggregation method "Dominant Component" returns the attribute value associated with the component with the highest composition in the map unit. If more than one component shares the highest composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher attribute value should be returned in the case of a composition tie. The result returned by this aggregation method may or may not represent the dominant condition throughout the map unit. The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a composition tie. This option indicates that a null value for a component should be converted to zero before aggregation occurs. This will be done only if a map unit has at least one component where this value is not null. Page 7 of 7

Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016

Percent Silt. Ontario County, New York Survey Area Version and Date: 13-09/24/2016 name 1A Fluvaquents-Udifluvents complex, 0 to 3 10.9 45, frequently flooded 2A Geneseo silty clay loam, 0 to 3 44.1 90 3A Hemlock silty clay loam, 0 to 3 45.4 90 4A Naples Creek silty clay loam, 0 to 3