Ms. Kathryn Lockyer, Clerk. tqidm&tijjjwd fl. Barbara Karrandjas Council/Committee Co-ordinator End.

Transcription

1 ?U Albion, 1840 Alton, 1820 Belfountain, 1825 Bolton, 1823 Caledon East, 1821 Caledon Village, 1826 Campbell's Cross, c Cataract, 1858 Cheltenham, 1827 Claude, c Inglewood, 1883 Mayfield West, 2006 Melville, 1831 Mono Road, 1871 Mono Mills, 1819 Palgrave, 1846 Sandhill, 1839 Terra Cotta, 1855 Tullamore.c Victoria, c Wildfield, 1833 Administration 6311 Old Church Road Caledon, ON L7C 1J6 October 3, 2013 Ms. Kathryn Lockyer, Clerk Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive PLANNING, DESIGN &DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Brampton, Ontario hate. (Jfrtemli^HjlOtS L6T 4B9 Dear Ms. Lockyer: RE: Mayfield West Secondary Plan: Preferred Framework Plan At the regular meeting of Council held on September 3, 2013, Council passed a resolution regarding the Mayfield West Secondary Plan: Preferred Framework Plan. The following resolution was adopted: That Report regarding A Recommended Framework Plan for the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan be received; and That Council endorse the framework plan attached as Schedule "A" to Report ; and That Council direct staff to use the framework plan to begin phase 3 of the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan Work Plan; and That Council direct staff to use the framework plan to prepare and submit an application to the Region of Peel to obtain an amendment to the Regional Official Plan toexpand the Mayfield WestSettlement Area Boundary; and That a copy of this report be sent to the Region of Peel, City of Brampton, Toronto Region Conservation, Credit Valley Conservation, Mayfield Station Landowners Group, and the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group, and any landowners not included in the landowners group. Attached please find a copy of Report for your information. Thank you. Yours truly, tqidm&tijjjwd fl Barbara Karrandjas Council/Committee Co-ordinator barbara.karrandias@caledon.ca End. cc: City of Brampton, Clerk T F

2 TRCA V\-2 CVC Mayfield Station Landowners Group (via ) Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group (via ) Tim Manley, Senior Policy Planner

3 Tl-S ^ To: From: Mayor and Members of Council Development Approval &Planning Policy Department Meeting: Subject: A Recommended Framework Plan for the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan RECOMMENDATIONS That Report regarding ARecommended Framework Plan for the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan be received; and That Council endorse theframework plan attached as Schedule "A" tothis report; and That Council direct staff to use the framework plan to begin phase 3 ofthe Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan work plan; and That Council direct staff to use theframework plan to prepare and submit an application to the Region ofpeel to obtain an amendment to the Regional official plan to expand the Mayfield West settlement area boundary; and Thata copy ofthis report be sent to the Region ofpeel, City ofbrampton, Toronto Region Conservation, Credit Valley Conservation, Mayfield Station Landowners Group, and the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Completion ofthe Mayfield West Phase2 Secondary Plan is a key component of Caledon's long-term growth management strategy, as envisioned in Regional Official Plan Amendment Number 24 and Official Plan Amendment Number 226. The proposed expansion tothe Mayfield West settlement area boundary isthe result of Caledon's municipal comprehensive review process as required by the Growth Plan, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Region of Peel Official Plan. The recommended framework plan attached as Schedule "A" to this report: Implements planning considerations consistent with Regional Official Plan Amendment Number 24 and Official Plan Amendment Number 226. Provides for the planning and design ofa complete community with a diverse mix of land uses, a range and mix ofhousing and employment types, high quality public open space and easy access to local amenities and services. Accommodates population and employment growth in Caledon's designated greenfield area that is compact and transit-supportive. Represents a logical and contiguous expansion to the Mayfield West settlement area boundary. Staffrecommends council endorse the framework plan and direct staffto use it to: (1) Begin phase 3 ofthe Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan work plan; and (2) Prepare and submit an application to the Region of Peel to obtain an amendment to the Regional official plan to expand the Mayfield West settlement area boundary. 1 Page 1 of 12

4 ?I-H DISCUSSION Purpose This report seeks Council's endorsement of a framework plan which will be used to complete the Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan. Background Provincial Planning Framework The Provincial planning system in Ontario is intended to guide growth and development across the Province and particularly the Greater Golden Horseshoe area in a cocoordinated and comprehensive manner. As such, all official plans and official plan amendments are required to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) The PPS provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. This policy-led planning system recognizes and is intended to addresses the complex inter-relationships among environmental, social, and economic factors in land use planning. The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (Growth Plan) The Growth Plan provides policy direction for implementing the Province's vision for building stronger, prosperous communities. Oneofthe key objectives ofthe Growth Plan is to minimize urban sprawl and promote cost-effective development. This has led to an increased emphasis on achieving higher densitiesfor both population and employment to reduce land consumption and to promote greater use ofexisting infrastructure. The Growth Plan provides growth management policy direction and population and employment forecasts for thegreater Golden Horseshoe area and the Regions within it, including the Region of Peel, for the 2031 planning horizon. The Places to Grow Act, 2005 requiresthat the Official Plans of all municipalities within the Growth Plan area be brought into conformity with the Growth Plan. In the Region of Peel, this resulted in a coordinated planning effort between the Region ofpeel and the Town ofcaledon, the City of Brampton andthe City ofmississauga and the adoption of required conformity amendments. Municipal Comprehensive Review (MCR) Both the Growth Plan and the Regional Official Plan require that Settlement Area Boundary expansions only be undertaken as part of a MCR, which is defined in the Growth Plan as: An official plan review, or an official plan amendment, initiated by a municipality that comprehensively applies thepolicies and schedules of this plan. The Mayfield West Settlement Area Boundary expansion fulfills the requirements ofan MCR process as envisioned by the Growth Plan and ROPA 24 - see discussion below. Region of Peel Planning Framework Regional Official Plan Amendment Number 24 (ROPA 24) The Provincial Growth Plan requires the Region of Peel to allocate growth to area municipalities up tothe 2031 planning horizon, with a focus on ensuring that growth MjliS/ Page 2of 12

5 ?/-5 occurs in such a manner that the targets of the Growth Plan are achieved on a regionwide basis. ROPA 24 is an Official Plan Amendment to provide new and updated policies on growth management, employment lands and greenbelt conformity. Adopted by Regional Council on April 22, 2010, it is intended to bring the Region's Official Plan into conformity with the Growth Plan and the Greenbelt Plan while being consistent with the PPS. ROPA 24 was approved bythe Ontario Municipal Board in June ROPA 24 allocates growth to area municipalities up to the 2031 planning horizon through a Regional Land Budget. The Regional Land Budget identifies the need for 609 hectaresofland for Settlement Area Boundary expansions to accommodate unallocated growth in Caledon to the year2031. Unallocated growth is growth for which no land is currently in the Regional and Caledon Official Plans. In summary, ROPA 24 provides the overall policies and population/employment numbers for Caledon's preparation ofa MCR to expand its Settlement Area Boundaries. Town of Caledon Planning Framework Official Plan Amendment No. 226 (OPA 226) The Growth Plan does not require allocation ofgrowth by the Region tospecific geographic areas within area municipalities. Caledon's own Provincial Policy Conformity exercise (OPA 226) allocates growth within the municipality in order to conform to the growth numbers allocated to Caledon by the Region, and to confirm that growth in the municipality will occur in such a manner as to achieve the Growth Plan targets established for Caledon in ROPA 24. Caledon's provincial policy conformity exercise culminated in Council's adoption ofopa 226 on June 8, 2010 (Report PD ; resolution ) and submitted to the Region of Peel for approval. OPA 226 was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and the OMB hearing is due to begin in October OPA226 as adopted and modified by the Town is being implemented bycaledon through a series ofsettlement Area Boundary expansion official plan amendments; an expansionto the Mayfield West settlementarea boundary to accommodate the growth delineated by the recommended framework plan is required to meet the growth forecasts for Mayfield West contained inthe Regional Land Budget and OPA 226. Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan (MW2) MW2 was initiated by Caledon in 2008 to determine the appropriate location and form for population and employment growth allocated to Mayfield West by Council. An expansion to the Mayfield West settlement area boundary is required to implement the growth. Council endorsed a general terms of reference (GTR) for MW2 which contain a fourphase work planwhich was designedto satisfy the requirements of a municipal comprehensive review as defined in the Provincial Growth Plan. The GTR describe the studies required to inform and support an application by Caledon to the Region of Peel to obtain an amendment to the Regional official plan (ROPA) for an expansion to the Mayfield West settlement area boundary, and a Caledon official plan amendment (LOPA) to implement the secondary plan. II. Page 3 of 12

6 In accordance with the GTR, Caledon retained a multi-disciplined team of external consultants to complete the necessary technical studies to fulfill the requirements of a MCR. The technical studies include: (1) Population and Employment Forecasts and Allocations Study, 2006 (Town of Caledon, Watson &Associates Economists Ltd, The Butler Group Consultants Inc.) - completed as part of the South Albion-Bolton Community Plan. (2) The Employment Land Needs Study, 2007 (Watson & Associates Economists). (3) Comprehensive Environmental Impact Study and Management Plan (multidisciplinary team led by Amec Environment & Infrastructure). (4) Agricultural Impact Assessment (Colville Consulting Inc.). (5) Water and Wastewater Servicing Study (R.J. Burnside &Associates). (6) Cultural Heritage Landscapes Assessment and Built Heritage Resources Assessment (Andre Scheinman and ENVision, The Hough Group). (7) StageJ Archaeological Assessment (Historic Horizon) (8) Transportation Impact Study (Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited). (9) Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (Jade Acoustics). (10) Commercial Needs Assessment (W. Scott Morgan). Caledon retained also Urban Strategies Inc. to be its community design consultant. Revised planning considerations for MW2 The modifications to ROPA 24, as a result of the OMB decision, resulted in a need to modify corresponding policies contained in OPA226. To bring Caledon's OPA 226 into conformity with ROPA 24, Council approved modifications to OPA226 on September 11, 2012 (Report DP ; resolution ). The modifications to OPA 226 were also endorsed by Peel Region Council on October 25, The modifications to OPA 226 included revisions to the planning considerations for MW2. The planning considerations for MW2 (i.e. population and jobs, land budget and density), as endorsed by Council in September 2012 are shown in Table 1. Table 1: MW2 Population, Jobs, Land Area and Density Proposed OPA 226 (as modified in Sept 2012) Population(1) 9,913 Population-related jobs. 2,635 Employment land jobs 1,164 Total: 13,712 Land area (hectares) 206 Density 66.6 (1) Population total excluding Census undercount. M_ m^r Page 4of 12

7 Pl-^ These numbers are presently before the OMB for approval as part of the OPA 226 hearing process. The decision of the OMB may result in revisions to Table 1or to the process that Caledon follows to implement the Growth Plan. Caledon's MW2 Consultant Team Caledon has retained ateam of external consultants to carry out the necessary technical studies which will inform and support the completion of MW2 (including both the ROPA and LOPA). This team is comprised of: (1) NAK Design Strategies - Community Design Plan. (2) Amec Environment &Infrastructure - Comprehensive Environmental Impact Study & Management Plan (EIS &MP). (3) Paradigm Transportation Solutions - Transportation Management Plan. (4) R.J. Burnside &Associates - Water &Wastewater Servicing Plan. (5) Watson &Associates - Fiscal and Economic Impact Assessment. Determination of a recommended framework plan Two framework- plans were reviewed with Council at a Council workshop in February 2012; the framework plans illustrated and tested alternatives for laying out key community components i.e. residential, commercial and employment land uses, and complimentary and supportive land uses such as parks, schools and a transit hub. Subsequently, the framework plans were reviewed with the MW2 stakeholder advisory group in March 2012 and the general public ata public open house in May Using the feedback provided, NAK Design Strategies (NAK) developed a draft recommended framework plan in the summer The draft framework plan was revised in the fall 2012 as a result of the modifications to OPA 226 in September Draft framework plan (February 2013) A draft framework plan was reviewed with Council at a Council workshop in February At this workshop, staff also reviewed with Council a draft ultimate communitv plan which identified the potential full build-out ofthe lands bounded by Highway 410/10, Mayfield Road, Chinguacousy Road and the Etobicoke Creek. The ultimate community plan enables both Caledon and Peel to plan for the appropriate municipal infrastructure (roads, waterand wastewater services) and community facilities (i.e. schools and parks) to support possible future growth beyond the MW2 planning considerations. Landowners' response to the draft framework plan(february 2013) The Mayfield Station Landowners Group (MSLG) raised concerns with the plans reviewed with Council in February MSLG's primaryconcern was the level of density and housing product mix proposed and, morespecifically, theirability to market and deliver the quantity of high density product in Mayfield West. MSLG asked for an opportunity to work with staff and Caledon's consultant team on an alternative framework plan that would address their concerns. The result of this collaborative effort is the framework plan attached as Schedule "A" to this report. Page 5 of 12

8 ?K Recommended framework plan (August 2013) The following substantive revisions have been made to the February 2013 draft framework plan. NAK has added a conceptual local road network; this is a logical next step in the evolution of a framework plan to a "block plan". Among other things, the level of detail contained in a block plan assists in confirming the land budget (i.e. population and job yields, and densities). The Plan excludes a portion of the lands on which the existing Brampton Christian School is located. The plan includes approximately 21 acres of the Cook property located at Chinguacousy Road. Low density and medium density residential blocks have replaced the commercial block south ofthe spine road and west of the Peel Region Police Facility. Collector Road G (a new east-west collectorroad) has been added east of McLaughlin Road and north of Mayfield Road so that Caledon's transportation planning team can test an alternative road pattern and confirm the need for a new access on to Mayfield Road opposite Van Kirk Drive in the City of Brampton. Collector Road D (a new north-south collector road west of McLaughlin Road) has been realigned a shortdistance westerly to reflect the City ofbrampton's approved Block Plan 51-2 road network. The high density residential blocks throughout the framework plan have been further reviewed and refined. Two high density residential blocks are proposed: (1) At the north-east corner ofmclaughlin Road and the spine road (within the proposed "urban village" centre). (2) At the north-west corner ofcollector Road Fand thespine road (in close proximity to the proposed transit hub). Key elements of the recommended framework plan The planning considerations achieved by the recommended framework plan areshown in Table 2 alongside the planning considerations proposed by OPA 226(refer back to Table 1). Table 2: Population Jobs, Land Area &Density Framework Plan Proposed OPA 226 Population(1) 10,081 9,913 Population-related jobs 2,635 2,635 Employment land jobs 1,164 1,164 Total: 13,880 13,712 Land area (hectares) Density (1) Population total excluding Census undercount. The framework plan accommodates population and employment growth in Mayfield West that is compact and transit-supportive, and provides opportunity to plan and design a complete community with a diverse mix of land uses, a range and mix of employment JjP^JJgra Page 6of 12

9 ' and housing types, high quality public open space and easyaccess to local amenities and services. Furthermore, the framework plan represents a logical and contiguous expansion to the Mayfield West settlement area boundary. Residential Lands The residential lands - (LD, MD, MD2, HD and UW) on theframework plan - will provide a range and mix of housing types including detached and semi-detached, townhouse, mid-rise apartment and live/work. New schools and community parks will compliment and support the population growth. Employment Lands An employment node- (E) on theframework plan - ofapproximately 16 hectares is located adjacent to and west of Highway 410/10. These lands will accommodate the employment land jobs shown in Table 1. This location is considered suitable for higher density employment uses, such as an office/business park, given its location adjacent to Highway 410 and proximity to the proposed regional commercial centre. This employment node supports Caledon's desire for MW2 to develop as a compact, complete and transit-supportive community. Commercial Lands The new commercial opportunities that exist in Mayfield West are significant. There exists an opportunity to provide a broad range and mix of new commercial uses for the residents of Caledon. The amount of commercial development proposed in MW2 will generate a significant share of the population-related jobs shown in Table 1. The majority of the commercial lands - (C) on the framework plan - are located within a proposed regional commercial centre adjacent to and west of Highway 410/10. Smaller commercial nodes are planned for the "urban village" centre (planned at the intersection of the spine road and McLaughlin Road) and at the north-east corner of Mayfield Road and McLaughlin Road. Transit Hub A transit hub - (TH) on the framework plan - is proposed within the regional commercial centre. This transit hub would support future inter-regional, intra-regional and local transit service in Mayfield West; an extension of the Metrolinx bus rapid service along Hurontario Street in to Caledon is proposed. The location and size of the regional commercial centre and employment lands provide the opportunity to attract a viable higher order transit service to Mayfield West. Natural Heritage System The recommended framework plan places a high priority on the protection and enhancement of the natural heritage system. Subject to appropriate land use designations, implementation of best management practices and good community design, all of the existing natural features within MW2 can be adequately protected and/or enhanced. Greenlands A and Greenlands B The existing woodlots and identified headwater features are identified as Greenlands A and the associated buffers and enhancement corridors are identified as Greenlands B on the recommended framework plan. Page 7 of 12

10 T>HO Forming a central and significant component ofthe framework plan, it is intended that Greenlands A and Greenlands Bwill collectively provide for a connected greenlands/natural heritage and open space systemthat will protect and enhance key existing natural features within the framework plan as well as the surrounding area; reflecting a key design principle of achieving net ecological gain, when practical, possible and advisable. For the purposes of determining the land budget for the framework plan, lands which constitute Greenlands A and Greenlands B have been excluded. The following dimensions have been used to prepare the recommended framework plan. Greenlands A Existing woodlots - (A1, A5, &A7) on the framework plan - is measured from staked drip line conducted in summer Protected headwater feature channel width - (A2, A3, &A4) on the framework plan is 60 metres. Greenlands B Buffer area around woodlots - (B2, B11, B13, & B14) on the framework plan - is 20 metres. Buffer area adjacent to OBRY Railway - (B8 & B9) on the framework - is 15 metres. Buffer area adjacent to Mayfield Road - (B4 & B5) on the framework Plan - is 10 metres. Enhancement corridor width - (B3, B10, B12, & B15) on the framework plan - is 50 metres. The ultimate recommended boundaries, location and width of the features identified as Greenlands A and Greenlands B will be guided by the approved Comprehensive EIS & MP and determined through individual environmental impact assessments prepared in support of detailed site specific planning applications. Stormwater Pond Facilities A total of 8 stormwater pond facilities support the implementation of the development proposed by the framework plan - (SWM5 through SWM11, &SWM15) on the. framework plan. The ultimate recommended location and size of the pond facilities will be guided by the approved Comprehensive EIS &MP and determined through individual technical studies prepared in support of detailed site specific planning applications. Refinements to the recommended framework plan During Phase 3 ofthe MW2 work plan (i.e. the detailed design phase) there will be an opportunity for refinements to the framework plan, however, any refinements must respect the MW2 planning considerations shown in Table 1. Region of Peel official plan amendment (ROPA) Staff recommends Council endorse the framework plan and direct staff to use it to prepare and submit an application to the Region of Peel to obtain an amendment to the Regional official planto expand the Mayfield West settlement area boundary. See Table 3 below for anticipated timing for the ROPA submission. Section of the Growth Plan outlines the requirements that must be addressed when considering Settlement Area Boundary expansions as part of an MCR. The PPS Ma ^mwfc-v page s of 12

11 provides additional requirements that must be addressed as part of a comprehensive review associated with expansion of a Settlement Area Boundary. With respect to ROPA 24, section outlines the policy requirements for expansions to settlement area boundaries to accommodate growth to The ROPA submission will demonstrate conformity to the policies of Provincial plans Region ofpeel and Caledon official plans. Caledon official plan amendment (LOPA) Staff recommends Council endorse the framework plan and direct staff to use it to begin phase 3 ofthe MW2 work plan. The Mayfield West Phase 2 Secondary Plan will be implemented through an amendment to Caledon's official plan. Prior to or concurrent with Caledon Council's consideration of a LOPA, the following 5 plans will be finalized; these plans are required to inform and/or support completion of MW2. (1) Community Design Plan - NAK Design Strategies. (2) Comprehensive EIS & MP - Amec Environment & Infrastructure. (3) Transportation Management Plan - Paradigm Transportation Solutions. (4)Water and Wastewater Servicing Plan - R.J. Burnside &Associates. (5) Fiscal &Economic Impact Assessment - Watson &Associates. All 5 study components are active and are moving forward on the basis of the recommended framework plan. The following is a summary ofthe tasks to be completed and the anticipated timing for their completion. See Table 3 belowfor anticipated timing for completion of MW2. Community Design Plan (CDP) As well as developing the recommended framework plan, NAK is also responsible for developing the MW2 community design plan. The MW2 CDP will provide Council, residents, landowners and stakeholders with a clear idea about the intended design of the overall community (e.g. road network, location of schools and parks, trails and cycling routes) as well as key components of the community (e.g. distribution of housing types, architecture, and design of streetscapes). The ideas and recommendations contained in the CDP will, in part, be used to prepare the Caledon official plan amendment. Comprehensive EIS & MP A three part study component, Part A and Part B have informed and supported the secondary plan to the point of developing the recommended framework plan. Part C of the Comprehensive EIS & MP will, among other things, describe the recommended environmental management strategy for the natural heritage system; stormwater management plan, and long-term monitoring program for MW2. Transportation Management Plan This plan will consist of a series of coordinated and iterative individual plans that encompass road network and streetscape design, transit routes, pedestrian, cycling and trails network, and traffic calming. In preparing these plans, recommendations will be made pertaining to speed limits, trafficcontrol devices (i.e. signals and all-way stops), and parking control, among others. BL Page 9 of 12

12 Tl-12. Water & Wastewater Servicing Plan The purpose of this study component is to recommend a water and wastewater servicing network and routing design to support development of MW2. Fiscal and Economic Impact Assessment This study component will provide a detailed examination of the anticipated Regional and Caledon development charge and property tax implications as well as an assessment of the potential economic benefit to Caledon of MW2. This study component relies in large part to the recommendations from the urban design, transportation and water / wastewater servicing teams. Anticipated timelines for completion of MW2 The anticipated timelines to complete MW2 are provided in Table 3. The time needed to complete the study components is consistent with the general terms of reference and the individual study component work plans / timelines. Table 3: Anticipated timeline for completion of MW2 Completion Required for Required for Date the ROPA the LOPA Recommended Framework Plan August 2013 Yes Yes Community Design Plan April 2014 No Yes Comprehensive EIS & MP (Part C) December 2013 No Yes Transportation Management Plan February 2014 Yes(1) Yes Water &Wastewater Servicing Plan February 2014 Yes*1' Yes Fiscal & Economic Impact Assessment February 2014 Yes<1> Yes (1) In order to complete a ROPA application, Caledon must undertake a fiscal impact assessment to address Regional interests (i.e. Regional roads and water / wastewater servicing). Completion ofthis assessment requires input from the transportation management and water &wastewater servicing plans. Thework plansfor the transportation management and water&wastewater servicing study components gives priority to completing the Regional aspect. As such, it is anticipated that in the fourth quarterof2013the detailed planning and design component, envisioned in Phase 3 ofthe MW2 study work plan, will be sufficiently advanced to allow Caledon to submit a complete ROPA application. Known risk factors The recommended framework plan implements the planning considerations for MW2 which wereendorsed by Council in September 2012 (shown in Table 1). Should Council endorse the recommended framework plan today, staff will use it to prepare the ROPA and LOPA. The Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on OPA 226 is due to begin in October 2013 and is scheduled to take 4 weeks to complete. A decision by the OMB on OPA 226 is anticipated in the winter 2013/2014. One known risk factor associated with the timing shown in Table 3 is uncertainty on the final form (e.g. population and employment allocations) ofopa 226. If, as a result ofthe decision of the OMB regarding OPA 226, modifications are required to the September 2012 version of OPA 226 that effect Mayfield West, there may be a need to modify the ROPA and/or LOPA accordingly. ^P^M^C Page 10 of 12

13 ?H3, Caledon has continued to move forward with planning based on the population and employment allocations in ROPA 24 and in OPA 226 as adopted and modified by Council. These numbers were supported by both the Region of Peel (through Council resolution) and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (as reflected in the Minutes of Settlement). While these numbers must still be approved by the Board, in order for Caledon to continue to meets its obligations to plan for the short, medium and long term, it is necessary to continue to move forward with planning decisions prior to the final approval of the population and employment allocations. The implications ofthe Board decision will be considered when it is made and, if necessary, appropriate modifications will be madeto ensure that the decision is properly implemented. Financial Implications There are no immediate financial implications as a result ofthis report. When development occurs, planning, building, engineering fees and development charges will be collected by the Town. Through the current development charge background study update, the Town is looking at growth-related infrastructure forthis and othergrowth throughout the Town. Applicable Legislation and Requirements The Planning Act, R.S.O The Places to Grow Act, 2005 Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006 Provincial Policy Statement, 2005 Region of Peel Official Plan COMMUNITY BASED STRATEGIC PLAN Strategic Objective Goal 2: Complete Our Community of Communities. NEXT STEPS Development Approval &Planning Policy staff will begin Phase 3 ofthe MW2 work plan. Tasks in this phase include completingthe following plans and assessments in accordance with the timing shown in Table 3. Community Design Plan. Comprehensive EIS & MP (Part C) Water &Wastewater Servicing Plan. Transportation Management Plan. Fiscal and Economic Impact Assessment. ROPA Submission Development Approval &Planning Policy staffwill prepare and submit an application to the Region of Peel to obtain an amendment to the Regional official planto expand the Mayfield West settlement area boundary priorto the end of Public Consultation in Phase 3 Public consultation opportunities in Phase 3 will include Council workshops, public open houses, and the MW2 stakeholder advisory group. A Page 11 of 12

14 VHH ATTACHMENTS Schedule "A" - Recommended Framework Plan (August 2013) Prepared by: Tim Manley Approver (L1): Haiqing Xu Approver (L2): Mary Hall Approver (L3): Douglas Barnes Page 12 of 12

15 Valleywood COVVL-ICiAL EMPLOYMENT MEDIUM DENSITY (TOWNHOUSE) MEDIUM DENSITY 2 (STACKED TOWNHOUSE) HIGH OENSITY (CONDOS / APARTMENT) LIVE-WORK UNITS PEEL REGION POLICE FACILITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PD - Peel Dmrw) (DP - Du»enn-Peel> SECONDARY SCHOOL (PO - Peel DoUlct) SWM. STORMWATER POND FACILITY S~\ CONCEPTUALSTORMWATER EXITING CHURCH GREENLANDS GREENLANDS COMMUNITY AUGUST MOUNT PLEASANT BLOCK PLAN 51-2 (BRAMPTON) RECOMMENDED FRAMEWORK PLAN MW2 MAYFIELD WEST PHASE 2