Department of Planning & Development Services

Transcription

1 Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T February 14, 2014 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DETAILS: ZA Site Plan for Kimball Business Center Chandraco, LP is requesting approval of a Site Plan the proposed Kimball Business Center for the development of two office/warehouse buildings, on approximately 3.83 acres located at 925 S. Kimball Avenue. SPIN Neighborhood #8 Chandraco, LP is requesting approval of a Site Plan the proposed Kimball Business Center for the development of two office/warehouse buildings totaling approximately 50,389 square feet of office/warehouse floor area. Kimball Business Center Existing Zoning I1 Proposed Zoning I1 Gross Area 3.83 acres Number of Proposed Buildings 2 Total Building Area 50,389 sq. ft. Provided Parking 158 Proposed Parking Ratio 1 space: 318 sq. ft. Variance Driveway Stacking Depth - the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 requires the applicant to provide a minimum driveway stacking depth of seventy-five (75) feet at the south entry. The applicant is requesting to reduce the stacking depth to approximately thirty-one (31) feet. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider Site Plan Approval Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 14, 2014 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) Patty Moos (817) ZA14-003

2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: APPLICANT: PROPERTY SITUATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: CURRENT ZONING: HISTORY: Chandraco, LP Pacheco Koch Consulting Engineers 925 S. Kimball Avenue Lot 2-R-2, Green Meadow Subdivision, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas I-1 Light Industrial District December 3, 1974: Green Meadows subdivision was approved by City Council. January 20, 2004: City Council (6-0) approved a plat revision to Lots 2R1 and 2R2 of the Green Meadow subdivision under Planning ZA The final plat was filed on March 31, 2004 CITIZEN INPUT: SOUTHLAKE 2030:. A SPIN (SPIN #8) meeting is schedule on February 11, 2014 for this proposed development. Consolidated Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Industrial District. T This designation is defined as; Industrial and business service development that is relatively free of unwanted side effects, such as unsightliness, noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc., is permitted in the Industrial category. If meeting the qualification of relatively free of unwanted side effects, suitable types of development in the Industrial category can be characterized by the manufacturing, processing, packaging, assembly, storage, warehousing and/or distribution of products. Ancillary commercial and retail activities associated with these uses are permitted. Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public activities as described above may be permitted if surrounding industrial uses do not pose hazards and are sufficiently buffered. he development as proposed appears to be consistent with the intent of the land use designation at this location. Pathways Master Plan Six (6) foot wide sidewalks along the S. Kimball Avenue will be constructed with this development. Attachment A ZA Page 1

3 TREE PRESERVATION: UTILITIES: The property proposed for development was platted in February 2004, it is regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The tree preservation regulations are different than in the current ordinance 585-D and are as follows: Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. Water The site has access to an existing 12-inch water line from the south along S. Kimball Avenue. Sewer The site has access to an existing 8-inch sewer line at the southeast corner of the property along S. Kimball Avenue. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed development will access onto S. Kimball Avenue, a four (4) lane divided arterial with approximately eighty-eight (88) feet of right-of-way. The entry drive will be north side of the intersection of E. Continental Boulevard. S. Kimball Avenue (70) (between E. Continental Boulevard & Crooked Lane) 24hr North Bound (4,477) South Bound (4,394) AM Peak AM (437) 11:45 AM 12:45 PM Peak AM (524) 7:45 8:45 AM PM Peak PM (426) 4:45 5:45 PM Peak PM (376) 3:45 4:45 PM * Based on the 2013 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact Use Area AM- AM- PM- PM- Vtpd* (sq. ft.) IN OUT IN OUT General Office (710) 39, Warehouse (150) 11, * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 th Edition STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Revised Review Summary No. 2, dated February 10, N:\Community Development\MEMO\2014 Cases\003 - SP - Kimball Business Center Attachment A ZA Page 2

4 Attachment B ZA Page 1

5 Plans and Support Information PROJECT NARRATIVE Owner: Applicant: Property Address: Property Location: Legal Description: Chandraco, LP Pacheco Koch 925 S. Kimball Avenue 3.83 acre tract located along the east R.O.W. of Kimball Avenue at Continental Boulevard Lot 2-R-2, Green Meadow Subdivision, C.B. McDonald Survey Current Zoning: I-1 SPIN: Property is located in SPIN #8. The Site Plan and Elevations were presented to SPIN on February 11, No questions or objections were noted in that meeting. Proposed Project: The proposed project will consist of two single-story buildings including one 13,709 s.f. office building and one 36,680 s.f. office/ flex building. This application shall be for an Amended Plat and Detailed Site Plan for the property. The Owner and Applicant do not anticipate any required variances as part of this application. The project will include a small Gathering Area in the southeast corner of the property to be furnished with several picnic tables and landscaped to provide an area which is conducive to sitting and socializing. This area is depicted and detailed on the Attachment C ZA Page 1

6 Site Plan Landscape Plan Attachment C ZA Page 2

7 Building A Elevations Front Elevation Rear Elevation West and East Elevations Building B Elevations West Elevation East Elevation South Elevation Attachment C ZA Page 3

8 Traffic Impact Analysis Review Attachment C ZA Page 4

9 Attachment C ZA Page 5

10 Attachment C ZA Page 6

11 Attachment C ZA Page 7

12 Attachment C ZA Page 8

13 Attachment C ZA Page 9

14 Attachment C ZA Page 10

15 Attachment C ZA Page 11

16 REVIEW SUMMARY SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY : ZA Review No.: Three Date of Review: 2/14/14 Project Name: KIMBALL BUSINESS CENTER APPLICANT: Pacheco Koch DEVELOPER: Chandraco, LP Javier D. Jaramillo, P.E. Sanjay Chandra 8350 N. Central Expressway, Ste Broken Bow Drive Dallas, TX Westlake, TX Phone: (972) Phone: (972) jjaramillo@pkce.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/13/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us Planning Review The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and does not represent a requirement. A material sample board may more clearly represent the materials being used on the building being proposed. This may be useful during the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting and City Council meetings. Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: Tree Conservation/Landscape Review 1. Please ensure that the existing trees that are proposed to be preserved can actually be properly preserved. Some of the existing trees that are proposed to be preserved are adjacent to the proposed buildings, at the edge of the parking, have grade changes proposed around them, and utilities installed proposed close to them. A protected tree shall be considered to be altered if one or more of the following occurs: more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the critical root zone is adversely affected, more than twenty-five percent (25%) of its canopy is removed, or the tree is disfigured to the extent a reasonable person would conclude the tree will not survive. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Attachment D ZA Page 1

17 Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS: 1. The eight (8) parking landscape islands on each side of the north building are less than twelve feet (12 ) wide. Planter islands shall have a minimum width of 12 back-of-curb to back-of-curb if curbed or 13 edge-to-edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 2. A canopy tree is proposed in a parking lot island with a fire hydrant proposed in it on the east side of the property. The tree will probably not be able to planted within this island because it is an offense to plant a tree within ten feet (10 ) of a fire hydrant. Alejandra Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Public Works/Engineering Review This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of construction plans. Street intersections must comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances will be required to conform to AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Benchmark information can be found in the City of Southlake website: TRAFFIC IMPAT ANALYSIS (TIA): The Traffic Impact Analysis conducted by DeShazo Group (DeShazo #13200), dated January 10, 2014 was sent to Lee Engineering for review. Refer to the comments from Lee Engineering which have been included for further information. The site is zoned as a Light Industrial District I-1 with anticipated General Office and Warehouse uses. The land uses permitted in the site should be restricted to those included in the TIA if a right turn deceleration lane is not provided. See Lee Engineering Comment 5. The TIA states that while signalization would benefit the intersection, the proposed development traffic does not create the need for the signal. See Lee Engineering Comment 6. The sight distance to the left for motorists exiting the site appears to be a potential concern. The TIA states that parking stalls will include curb stops to keep vehicles away from the sight triangle. Also, planting should be restricted to low growth (less than 2 tall) along the frontage but the landscape plan submitted indicates trees proposed to be planted within the sight triangle. See Lee Engineering Comment 8. Attachment D ZA Page 2

18 The proposed driveway does not align well with the lanes on Continental. A two lane exit from the site would also be desirable to allow flexibility with signal phasing and left turn operation. See Lee Comment 10. EASEMENTS: Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW. All waterlines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: This site drains to the south into an existing drainage swale. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary shall be required prior to releasing civil plans for construction. If detention is necessary; the difference between pre and post development runoff shall be captured in a detention pond. The proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events. Any changes to the site plan to include a detention pond may require approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Provide calculations with the civil construction plans verifying that the street and existing curb inlets contain the necessary capacity to convey fully developed conditions. Provide capacity for the proposed storm drain line located along the eastern property for the northern property. All storm sewers collecting runoff from the public street shall be RCP. The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 4 copies civil construction plans (22 X 34 full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City s website: A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) to connect to the City s sewer, water or storm sewer system. A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. Payment, Performance and a separate 2-year Maintenance Bond for public infrastructure shall be required for this development. The 2-year Maintenance Bond shall be bound only unto the City of Southlake. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way as required per the Commercial Developer Agreement. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No =Denotes informational comment. Kelly Clements Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us Fire Department Review Attachment D ZA Page 3

19 GENERAL COMMENTS: The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5 X5 if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6 X6 if it is on the riser. Fire department sprinkler connections, FDC, are to be a five inch Storz connection with a 30 degree down elbow and a Knox locking cap. A fire alarm system will be required for all buildings equipped with an automatic sprinkler system. The fire alarm must comply with the 2009 International Fire Code, The City of Southlake amendments, and NFPA 72. (Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001) An exterior audible/visual fire alarm device must be installed above the Fire Department Connection on each sprinkled building to indicate when a fire alarm condition is present in the building. A complete set of plans for the underground fire protection line, fire sprinkler system, and fire alarm system shall be submitted to Reed Fire Protection for review and approval at Midway Road in Addison, Texas Business phone is HVAC units over 2000 cubic feet per minute shall have a duct smoke detector mounted on the return side of the unit, that when activated, shall send an alarm condition to the building fire alarm panel and shut the unit down. HVAC units over cubic feet per minute shall also have a duct detector mounted on the supply side of the unit that functions as the detector does on the return side. If the units are located above ceiling tile, remote reset switches must be installed below the duct detector location. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (minimum of 80,000 pounds GVW) INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: All commercial buildings are required to have Knox Box rapid entry systems installed. Boxes can be ordered at or contact the Fire Marshal s Office. General Informational Comments * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Attachment D ZA Page 4

20 * A portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit an Amended Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Attachment D ZA Page 5

21 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Kimball Business Center SPO # Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response 1. St John Bapt Ch Grand Prairie CS 800 S KIMBALL AVE NR 2. Denmiss Llc I1 910 S KIMBALL AVE 0.93 NR 3. Denmiss Llc I1 920 S KIMBALL AVE 1.49 NR 4. Denmiss Llc I1 930 S KIMBALL AVE 1.48 NR 5. Loh Texas Investment Llc I1 940 S KIMBALL AVE 1.52 NR 6. Vario Properties Lp I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 2.70 NR 7. Inprov Real Estate Lp I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 2.06 NR 8. Vario Properties Lp I1 901 S KIMBALL AVE 3.45 NR 9. Chandraco Broadgate Gp I1 925 S KIMBALL AVE 3.82 NR 10. Pfa Properties Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 0.87 NR 11. S L J Continental Plaza Ltd I1 950 S KIMBALL AVE 1.32 NR 12. Journey 5 Ventures Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 0.79 NR 13. Elite Suites Ltd I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.63 NR 14. Keith, Wendell P & Carol N I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.36 NR 15. K & D Development I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 0.55 NR 16. Journey 5 Ventures Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 0.57 NR 17. A & B Properties Inc Etal I SH NR 18. Thomas Family Partnership Lllp SP CROOKED LN NR 19. Carroll ISD SP S KIMBALL AVE NR 20. S L J Continental Plaza Ltd I1 960 S KIMBALL AVE 4.15 NR 21. Bhs Ventures Llc SF1-A 695 S KIMBALL AVE 1.41 NR 22. Pearson, Carey Etux Kelly SF1-A 2300 CROOKED LN 1.41 NR 23. Wood, Charles W Etux Margaret SF1-A 2350 CROOKED LN 1.41 NR 24. Westgate Office Park Owners I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR 25. Bhs Ventures Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR 26. Ddrt Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR 27. McKamic, Sammy L & Miranda I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR Attachment E ZA Page 1

22 28. Cornerstone Wealth Mgt Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR 29. Cogent Point Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR 30. Cogent Point Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR 31. Cogent Point Llc I E CONTINENTAL BLVD 1.41 NR F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Thirty (31) Responses Received: None Attachment E ZA Page 2