Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport
|
|
- Andrew Osborne
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 of 1 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Archaeology Programs Unit Programs and Services Branch Culture Division 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Archaeology@ontario.ca Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Unité des programmes d'archéologie Direction des programmes et des services Division de culture 401, rue Bay, bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Archaeology@ontario.ca Dec 4, 2017 Thomas Irvin (P379) This Land Archaeology Inc. 136 Orsi Newmarket ON L3Y 3H6 RE: Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled, "Report on the Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of the Toronto Board of Trade Golf Course Redevelopment, Located on Part of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Concession 7; and Part of Lots 10 and 11, Concession 8, In the Town of Woodbridge, Regional Municipality of York, Historic County of York, Ontario ", Dated Nov 27, 2017, Filed with MTCS Toronto Office on N/A, MTCS Project Information Form Number P , MTCS File Number Dear Mr. Irvin: The above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18, has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports without technical review. 1 Please note that the ministry makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy or quality of reports in the register. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to send your inquiry to Archaeology@Ontario.ca cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Ian MacLead,The Muzzo Group of Companies City of Vaughan,Planning Department 1In no way will the ministry be liable for any harm, damages, costs, expenses, losses, claims or actions that may result: (a) if the Report(s) or its recommendations are discovered to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent; or (b) from the issuance of this letter. Further measures may need to be taken in the event that additional artifacts or archaeological sites are identified or the Report(s) is otherwise found to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent.
2 November 27, 2017 Report on the Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of the Toronto Board of Trade Golf Course Redevelopment, Located on Part of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Concession 7; and Part of Lots 10 and 11, Concession 8, In the Town of Woodbridge, Regional Municipality of York, Historic County of York, Ontario Submitted to: Clubhouse Properties Inc. And to: The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Licensee: Thomas Irvin, Licence Number P379 PIF Number: P Report Type: Original
3 Executive Summary This Land Archaeology Inc. was contracted by Clubhouse Properties Inc.to conduct a Stage Archaeological Assessment of the Toronto Board of Trade Golf Course Redevelopment project, located on part Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Concession 7; and Part of Lots 10 and 11, Concession 8, in the Town of Woodbridge, Ontario. The Stage 1 study provided background information on the property s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land conditions. Despite evidence of disturbance over most of the property over the past 150 years; the background information indicates high Aboriginal and Euro-Canadian archaeological potential. Given the archaeological potential indicators, a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of the Study Area is required in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists. This includes: A test pit assessment of areas where a visual pedestrian survey cannot be undertaken. This involves systematically excavating test pits, 30 cm in diameter, by hand at 5 meters intervals, screening the soil through a 6 mm mesh to recover artifacts and examining the profiles of the test pit for cultural stratigraphy. Test pits are dug 5 cm into subsoil and are then backfilled. During the Stage 2 assessment, portions of the property that have been disturbed, and which are found to hold low/no archaeological potential will be identified and recorded during fieldwork; photographed, mapped and shown on the results of assessment. It is recommended that this report be entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports and a letter of confirmation be issued by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport supporting these recommendations. Page ii
4 Project Personnel Project Director: Graphics: Report Production: Thomas Irvin (P379) Leslie Town Thomas Irvin Claire Milligan Janine Stroud Leslie Town Page iii
5 Table of Contents Select Table of Contents to jump to subject. Executive Summary... ii Project Personnel... iii Table of Contents... iv Location and Environment... 5 Stage Project Context: Development Context Project Context: Study Area Determination Project Context: Pre-Contact Historical Context... 5 Table 1: Occupation of South-Central Ontario Summary Project Context: Post-Contact History of the Area Project Context: Archaeological Context... 8 Table 2: Sites within 1 km of the Current Study Area Stage 1: Analysis and Conclusions Stage 1: Recommendations Advice on Compliance of Legislation Bibliography Figure 1: Location of Study Area Figure 2: 1860 Map of the County of York Figure 3: 1878 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of York Figure 4: Current Land Use Figure 5A: Stage 1 Recommendations Archaeological Potential Figure 5B: York Region Archaeological Potential Map Page iv
6 Location and Environment The Study Area, currently used as a golf course, is approximately 117 hectares in size. The property is positioned approximately 2.5 km north of Highway 407 and 500 m north-east of the historic Toronto Grey and Bruce Railway. The Humber River transects the Study Area and the land is located within the Peel Plain physiographic region. Stage Project Context: Development Context This Land Archaeology Inc. was contracted by Clubhouse Properties Inc to conduct Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the Toronto Board of Trade Golf Course Redevelopment, located on part Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Concession 7; and Part of Lots 10 and 11, Concession 8, in the Town of Woodbridge, Ontario (Figure 1). The Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was initiated in support of an Official Plan Amendment (OPA) submission. Currently, the proponent is planning on developing the property for residential purposes. The development of residential lands is listed under the Planning Act (R.S.O. 1990) and the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990). The proponent provided TLA with the property limits and verified the Study Area via the maps provided within this report. 2.2 Project Context: Study Area Determination This Land Archaeology Inc. has been contracted by the proponent to archaeologically assess specific land areas. These areas consist of the lands subject to an archaeological assessment within the current Study. Permission to conduct an archaeological assessment was given by the proponent. This assessment has been limited by the proponent to the Study Area as reported herein. 2.3 Project Context: Pre-Contact Historical Context A general summary of the pre-contact and post-contact settlement of South Central Ontario is presented below in Table 1. Page 5
7 Table 1: Occupation of South-Central Ontario Summary Date Period Sub-Period Culture Peoples Diagnostic Traits/Actions Present Euro-Canadian Europeans Euro-Canadian Settlement of the land Historic A.D Algonquian Mississaugas Tribal Displacements and Re-locations A.D Historic Huron Dispersal by Five Nations Iroquoians Introduction of European trade goods Late Ontario Prehistoric Huron Village planning for defense Tribal Differentiation and warfare A.D Large palisaded villages common Terminal Woodland Middleport Elaboration of smoking pipes Middle Introduction of beans A.D Iroquoians Uren Expansion into SW Ontario A.D. 800 Early Pickering 2.4 Project Context: Post-Contact History of the Area Conquest of Glen Meyer peoples by Pickering Peoples from SE Ontario Settled village life A.D. 800 Princess Point Incipient horticulture Saugeen Trade with Hopwellian peoples in Ohio A.D. 0 Initial Woodland Introduction of Bow and Arrow Meadowood 1000 B.C Late Introduction of Pottery Mortuary ceremonialism Long distance trade Archaic Middle Ground stone and copper tools Hunters and gathers Early Introduction of spear thrower 8000 B.C. Late Big game hunters Paleo-Indian Occupation of tundra environment 8900 B.C. Early Glaciers retreat Originally known as Burwick, the area of Woodbridge was settled circa 1837 after Rowland Burr constructed a flour mill and laid out village lots (Rayburn, 1997). When Burr applied for the establishment of a post office in the area, his application was rejected due to concern that his Burwick would be confused with Eastern Ontario s Berwick (Rayburn, 1997). As such, the village was subsequently identified as Vaughan (the name of the township in which it was located) until 1855 when the name Woodbridge was suggested (Rayburn, 1997). In 1885 a historical sketch of the town indicated it was supporting a population of 1,100 of which approximately 112 were children attending the local school. The Page 6
8 description also indicates the town included a saw-mill, distillery and woolen factory in addition to Burr s flour mill (Adam, 1885). Two general stores, a carriage works, two churches, two hotels, a library and two newspapers had also been established within the community, evidently suggesting a thriving locale (City of Vaughan, 2016). In the 20 th century, Woodbridge grew to encompass the former hamlets of Brownsville, Elder s Mills, Vaughanville and Pine Grove. Today, its population stands at approximately 40,000 inhabitants (City of Vaughan, 2016). A total of 2 historic maps were consulted for this study as follows: - The Tremaine Map from 1860 indicates the Study Area had multiple owners and contained a number of structures (Figure 2). A majority of the land was owned by S. Smith including the southern tip of the Study Area which was comprised of Woodbridge s town center. The north and north western portions of the Study Area were owned by C. Wallas, T.Musson and N. Shaver. Regarding the structures located within the Study Area, only one was identified (illustrated as a saw mill), the balance were located within Woodbridge s town center and presumably included some of the businesses previously mentioned (i.e. generals stores, carriage works etc.). - The 1878 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of York also indicated the Study Area had multiple owners and contained a number of structures (Figure 3). A majority of the land is still shown as being owned by Samuel Smith, while the northern and north-western portions of the property (the more agricultural areas) were owned by others including Charles Wallace, George Elliott and James Thompson. Regarding the structures located within the Study Area, the following illustrations were included: o A structure and orchard on Lot 12, Con. 7 (owned by James Thompson ); o A structure on Lot 11, Con. 8 (owned by George Elliott ); o Multiple structures (presumably residential/commercial) located within the southern tip which extends into the town center of Woodbridge. It should also be noted that a Methodist church is illustrated within close proximity to the edge of the current Study Area on the 1878 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of York. This church was established in 1836 on Meeting House Road but was subsequently torn down and relocated in 1883 (City of Vaughan Heritage Inventory). The associated pioneer cemetery, known as the Woodbridge Methodist Cemetery was left intact on the grounds and was assumed by the City of Vaughan in the late 20 th century. Current mapping indicates the pioneer cemetery is located Page 7
9 approximately 100 m south-west of the current Study Area with a steep slope and residential housing dividing the properties. According to the historical sources consulted, since the onset of Euro-Canadian settlement in the area, the southern portion of the Study Area has been used for both residential and commercial purposes, as it extends into the town center of Woodbridge, while the northern portion has predominantly been used for agricultural and rural, residential purposes. As per a search conducted with the Ministry of Consumer Services on January 25, 2017 the Study Area contains no registered cemeteries. Nor are there any structures designated under Section IV of the Ontario Heritage Act that fall within the current Study Area.* *Please Note: While no designated structures are location within the current Study Area, three designated properties are located on Lot 8, Concession 7 (117 Clarence St.; 8177 Kipling Ave.; 8161 Kipling Ave.) and an additional three properties located within 50 m of the current Study Area are listed as holding Cultural Heritage Value or Interest. It should also be noted that the southern tip of the Study Area is included within the Woodbridge Heritage Conservation District. 2.5 Project Context: Archaeological Context A review of the Ontario Sites Database was conducted to determine the nature of any known archaeological sites within a 1 km radius of the Study Area (MTCS, 2017). A centroid of the Study Area was selected at UTM 17T ; , in conjunction with the property dimensions along cardinal axis from this centroid was used to conduct the search in the Sites Module. In addition, assistance was requested and given by the MTCS Sites Coordinator due the irregular and large Study Area size. A review of the Ontario Sites Database indicated there were 11 known archaeological sites within 1 km of the Study Area. These sites are shown below in Table 2. Of the 11 sites within 1 km of the current Study Area, the Little Dunpar Site (AkGv- 284) was located on Lot 9-10, Concession 7 and the Dalmosh Site (AkGv-68) was located on Lot 11, Concession 8. None of the sites were located within the current Study Area. The Little Dunpar Site was a pre-contact site found by Archaeological Assessments Ltd. in 2008; the Dalmosh Site was a campsite found by Mayer, Pihl, Poulton & Assoc. Inc. in It should be noted that previous archaeological assessments (Stage 1 and 2) may have been conducted within 50 m of the Study Area by other consulting Page 8
10 archaeological firms. However, if no archaeological resources were registered with the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, no notification on any such previous assessment is provided to consultant archaeologists. No other documentation indicating additional/previous archaeological assessments have been conducted on or within 50m of the Study Area was readily available. Table 2: Sites within 1 km of the Current Study Area Borden Number Site Name Time Period Site Type Affinities AkGv-69 Constellation 2 Other Camp/Campsite AkGv-68 Dalmosh Other Camp/Campsite AkGv-63 Kline Mills Post-Contact Homestead Euro-Canadian AkGv-62 Reiss Woodland, Late Camp/Campsite Aboriginal AkGv-61 Constellation 1 Other Camp/Campsite AkGv-60 Boyd West Other Camp/Campsite AkGv-284 Little Dunpar Pre-Contact - AkGv-283 Dunpar Archaic, Middle - AkGv-2 McKenzie Woodland Burial; Village AkGv-139 Latree Woodland Village Aboriginal AkGv-128 McLean Post-Contact Homestead Euro-Canadian The Study Area is currently comprised of a golf course, Club House and parking areas owned by the Woodbridge County Club (Figure 4). The surficial geology of the Study Area indicates the land is comprised predominantly of diamicton (poorly sorted materials) and sand with small sections of silt. The topography of the property indicates the land is rolling with a steady decline towards the south. The golf course opened in 1965; construction has altered the landscape and watercourses within, as such several areas of disturbance may be present within the Study Area. Historically, the Study Area would have been an appropriate area for resource procurement by both pre-and post-contact cultural groups. 2.6 Stage 1: Analysis and Conclusions As per the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists, a Study Area with high archaeological potential requires assessment, whereas one with low potential does not. A number of factors are employed in determining a property s archaeological potential, which includes both Euro-Canadian and Aboriginal potential. Criteria include physiographic variables such as a property s distance from a water source, as well as geographic characteristics such as distinct topographic features and soils which may also indicate archaeological potential. Page 9
11 Also considered in determining archaeological potential is the presence of known archaeological sites within or in the vicinity of the Study Area. Since water sources have remained relatively stable in Southern Ontario since the post-glacial period, proximity to water is regarded as a useful index for the evaluation of archaeological site potential for both the Aboriginal and Euro-Canadian periods of occupation. Furthermore, areas of early Euro-Canadian settlement and proximity to historic transportation corridors such as roads and railways also affect a property s historic archaeological potential. According to the background information sources consulted, the following characteristics indicate high Aboriginal and Euro-Canadian archaeological potential for the property as per the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists: - The York Region Master Plan of Archaeological Potential indicates archaeological potential is present (Figure 5B); - 11 archaeological sites are located within 1 km of the current Study Area; - The Study Area is in close proximity to an early historic transportation route (Kipling Ave. Islington Ave.); - The Study Area is in close proximity to an area of historic settlement (i.e. Woodbridge); - Structures/areas of historic development are shown within the Study Area on the historic mapping; - A watercourse transects the Study Area (Humber River). 2.7 Stage 1: Recommendations Given the archaeological potential indicators, a Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of the Study Area is required in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (Figure 5A). This includes: A test pit assessment of areas where a visual pedestrian survey cannot be undertaken. This involves systematically excavating test pits, 30 cm in diameter, by hand at 5 meters intervals, screening the soil through a 6 mm mesh to recover artifacts and examining the profiles of the test pit for cultural stratigraphy. Test pits are dug 5 cm into subsoil and are then backfilled. During the Stage 2 assessment, portions of the property that have been disturbed, and which are found to hold low/no archaeological potential will Page 10
12 be identified and recorded during fieldwork; photographed, mapped and shown on the results of assessment. Advice on Compliance of Legislation This report is submitted to the Ministry of Tourism and Culture as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c The report is reviewed to ensure that it complies with the standards and guidelines that are issued by the Minister, and that the archaeological field work and report recommendations ensure the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario. When all matters relating to archaeological sites within the project area of a development proposal have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Tourism and Culture, a letter will be issued by the Ministry stating that there are no further concerns with regard to alterations to archaeological sites by the proposed development. It is an offence under Sections 48 and 69 of the Ontario Heritage Act for any party other than a licensed archaeologist to make any alteration to a known archaeological site or to remove any artifact or other physical evidence of past human use or activity from the site, until such time as a licensed archaeologist has completed archaeological field work on the site, submitted a report to the Minister stating that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest, and the report has been filed in the Ontario Public Register of Reports referred to in Section 65.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Should previously undocumented archaeological resources be discovered, they may be a new archaeological site and therefore subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteration of the site immediately and engage a licensed consultant archaeologist to carry out archaeological field work, in compliance with Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The Cemeteries Act, R.S.O c. C. 4 and the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.33 (when proclaimed in force) require any person discovering human remains must notify the police or coroner and the Registrar of Cemeteries at the Ministry of Consumer Services. Archaeological sites recommended for further archaeological fieldwork or protection remain subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act and may not be altered, or have artifacts removed from them, except by a person holding an archaeological licence. Page 11
13 Bibliography Adam G.M., Mulvany, C.P, Robinson, C.B. (1885). History of Toronto and County of York, Ontario. Toronto, ON: C. Blackett Robinson. City of Vaughan. (2016). A Brief History of Woodbridge. Retrieved from Docu ments/a%20brief%20history%20of%20woodbridge.pdf ESRI Canada. (2015). Digital Globe, GeoEye, l-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS user Community [software]. Available from First Base Solutions. (2015). Ontario Base Mapping [software]. Available from Miles & Co. (1878). [Historical Mapping] Illustrated Historical Atlas for York County. Retrieved from frames.php Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. (2011). Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists. Toronto: Queen s Printer. Ontario Geological Survey. (n.d.). Surficial Geology Data for Southern Ontario [computer software]. Sudbury: Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Rayburn, A. (1997). Place Names of Ontario. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press. Smith, W. H. (1846) Canadian Gazetteer. Retrieved from Tremaine, G. (1860). [Historical Mapping] Map of the York County. Retrieved from York Region, York Maps (2017). Interactive Maps, Land Information, Archaeological Potential. Retrieved from Page 12
14 Figure 1: Location of Study Area. Page 13
15 Figure 2: 1860 Map of the County of York. Page 14
16 Figure 3: 1878 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the County of York. Page 15
17 Figure 4: Current Land Use. Page 16
18 Figure 5A: Stage 1 Recommendations Archaeological Potential. Page 17
19 Figure 5B: York Region Archaeological Potential Map. Page 18
STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY
STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF YONGE STREET SUBWAY EXTENSION, LOTS 37-41, CONCESSION EYS, TOWNSHIP OF MARKHAM, CITY OF TORONTO, YORK COUNTY Original License Report Submitted to: Ecoplans Limited
More informationRevised License Report
STAGE 1 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, EGLINTON AVENUE FROM JANE STREET TO BRICKNELL STREET, CONCESSION 5, LOT 11, CONCESSION 6, LOT 41, YORK TOWNSHIP,
More informationDetritus Consulting Ltd.
Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1, 2) Plan 55, Part Lot 18 RP 17R2952, Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4, Geographical Township of West Grey, Formerly Part of Lot 1 and 2, Concession 2, Historical Township of Bentick,
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre
Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre ARCHEOLOGY DETAILED IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Archeoworks Inc.
More informationOriginal License Report. Submitted to: New Horizon Development Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 304 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Phone (905)
STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 2480-2496 OLD BRONTE ROAD, PART OF LOT 31, CONCESSION 1 SOUTH OF DUNDAS STREET, GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF TRAFALGAR, TOWN OF OAKVILLE, REGIONAL MUNICPALITY OF HALTON Original
More informationMinistère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport
APPENDIX B Page 1 of 1 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Culture Programs Unit Programs and Services Branch Culture Division 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 ArchaeologyReports@ontario.ca
More informationSTAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:
STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF RATHBURN ROAD, FROM DUKE OF YORK BOULEVARD TO SHIPP DRIVE, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Submitted to: McCormick Rankin Corporation 2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 280 Mississauga,
More informationVILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN
Page 1 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 THE PROJECT VILLAGE OF BOLTON HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT PLAN TERMS OF REFERENCE The Town of Caledon (Town) is a large, predominantly rural municipality with
More informationSTAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSISSAUGA BRT (EAST), CITY OF MISSISSAUGA. Submitted to:
STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MISSISSAUGA BRT (EAST), CITY OF MISSISSAUGA Submitted to: Ecoplans Limited 2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 280 Mississauga, Ontario L5K 2P8 Telephone (905) 823-4988
More informationAppendix I. Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Report
Appendix I Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Report Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment for: Region of Waterloo Rapid Transit Project Regional Municipality of Waterloo Ontario Transit Project Assessment
More informationTHE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BYLAW NO A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK BILL NO. 13 BYLAW NO. 2014-13 A bylaw to adopt Amendment No. 6 to the Official Plan for The Regional Municipality of York WHEREAS the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.p.13,
More informationAPPENDIX H. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment
APPENDIX H Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment THE STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE MUNICIPAL CLASS EA FOR HARVIE ROAD/BIG BAY POINT ROAD/HIGHWAY 400, CITY OF BARRIE, SIMCOE COUNTY Prepared for
More informationBaby Point Heritage Conservation District Study. Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church
Baby Point Heritage Conservation District Study Kick-off Community Meeting March 27, 2017 Humbercrest United Church Agenda 7:00 Welcome 7:10 HCD Study Overview and Process 8:00 Interactive Discussion /
More informationARCHEOWORKS INC. Project Number: Licence/CIF#: P June 2006
ARCHEOWORKS INC. ADDENDUM to CIF# P029-088: Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment of Two parcels within Proposed Green Ginger Developments Subdivision: A) Fallow Field/Wooded Parcel (16.3-acres) & B) Holdout
More informationSubmitted to. Armel Corporation Suite Spectrum Way, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5N5 Telephone: Facsimile:
The 2006 Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment of the Proposed Elmira West Development, Lot 6, Concession 1, B Division, Guelph Township, City of Guelph, Wellington County, Ontario Submitted to Armel Corporation
More informationCultural Heritage Resources
Cultural Heritage Resources An Information Bulletin for Projects Subject to Ontario Regulation 359/09 - Renewable Energy Approvals Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 2011 (updated August 2013) Disclaimer:
More informationTOWN OF AURORA HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND CONSERVATION PLANS GUIDE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Development Planning Division Heritage Planning Section Phone: 905-727-3123 ext. 4226 Fax: 905-726-4736 Email: planning@aurora.ca Town of Aurora 100 John West Way, Box
More informationSubmitted: July 23, 2009
Stage I and II Archaeological Assessment Jock River Estates Phase 2 PML Project No. 0801-01 Client: 773804 Ontario Inc. Lot 21, Concession 2 Geographic Township of Goulbourn City of Ottawa Submitted: July
More informationGarden District Heritage Conservation District Study
Garden District Heritage Conservation District Study Community Consultation Meeting September 24 th, 2013 What is a Heritage Conservation District? A defined area of heritage significance and character
More informationChapter 6 cultural heritage
6 Cultural Heritage 6.1 Protecting Vaughan s Cultural Heritage 165 6.1.1 Protecting Vaughan s Cultural Heritage 165 6.1.2 Maintaining a Heritage Inventory 166 6.1.3 Promoting Vaughan s Cultural Heritage
More informationMONITORING STRATEGY. CRM Lab Archaeological Services
CRM Lab Archaeological Services MONITORING STRATEGY Archaeological Monitoring and Mitigation Strategy submitted to City Planning - for project 587-599 Yonge Street, 7 & 9 Gloucester Street, 4 Dundonald
More information1.0 PROJECT REPORT COVER PAGE
1.0 PROJECT REPORT COVER PAGE LICENSEE INFORMATION: Contact Information: Licensee: Ontario Archaeology Licence: Michael B. Henry CD BA FRAI FRSA Marilyn E. Cornies BA CAHP Southwestern District Office
More informationA. M. Archaeological Associates
THE STAGE 1 AND 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE 393 DUNDAS STREET WEST PROPERTY, TOWN OF OAKVILLE (PART LOT 19, CONCESSION 1, GEO. TWP. TRAFALGAR NORTH, HALTON COUNTY) Prepared for Emil Toma, Distrikt
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre
Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre ARCHAEOLOGY EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared by: Archaeological
More informationAPPENDIX 'D' Archaeological Investigation
City of Peterborough Lansdowne Street West Our File: 6552 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT ADDENDUM APPENDIX 'D' Archaeological Investigation March 2008 Lansdowne Street West Widening / Reconstruction Class
More informationASI ORIGINAL REPORT. Prepared for: Golden Arch Tech Investment Corporation 1092 Argyle Drive Oakville, ON L6J 1A7 T
STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF 2418 KHALSA GATE PART OF LOT 31, CONCESSION 1, SOUTH OF DUNDAS STREET GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF TRAFALGAR, COUNTY OF HALTON NOW IN THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY
More information2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham
STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY 2900 Steeles Avenue East at Don Mills Road in the Town of Markham Date: January 23, 2008 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: North York Community Council Director, Community
More informationLand adjacent to Dingle Dock, Front Street, East Garston
Land adjacent to Dingle Dock, Front Street, East Garston An Archaeological Watching Brief for Dr J Davies by Jo Pine Thames Valley Archaeological Services Site Code DEG99/82 January 2000 Summary Site name:
More informationARCHEOWORKS INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Archeoworks Inc. i ARCHEOWORKS INC. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment for the: Trafalgar Road (Regional Road 3) Improvements Class EA Study From Cornwall Road to Highway 407 Town of Oakville Regional Municipality
More informationCULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE & BUILT HERITAGE FEATURES
CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE & BUILT HERITAGE FEATURES DUNTROON QUARRY EXPANSION LOT 25 AND PART LOT 26, CONCESSION 12 & PART LOT 25, CONCESSION 12 CLEARVIEW TOWNSHIP
More information1 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING INFORMATION REPORT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO 6 TO THE YORK REGION OFFICIAL PLAN, 2010 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Clause No. 1 in Report No. 5 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on November 21, 2013. 1 STATUTORY PUBLIC MEETING
More informationFinal Initial Study. Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation Conditional Use Permit
5 Final Initial Study Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation Conditional Use Permit Appendix B Chalice Unitarian Universalist Congregation Cultural Resources Memorandum TRC 9685 Research Drive Irvine,
More informationPhase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin
Phase One Archaeological Investigation Results, James Madison Park Master Development Plan Project, City of Madison, Dane County, Wisconsin Prepared for the City of Madison Parks Department 28 January
More informationIntention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East Date: September 7, 2016 To: From: Toronto Preservation
More informationAppendix E Study Area Archaeological Assessment
Appendix E Study Area Archaeological Assessment ARCHEOWORKS INC. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (AA): Proposed Zone 5 Sub-Transmission Main Preliminary Alternatives City of Brampton Regional Municipality
More informationL 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. Cheyne Family Cemetery. Main Street South
L 2-1 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION Cheyne Family Cemetery Main Street South October 2013 L 2-2 PROFILE OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Municipal Address Main Street South (Lot 14, Con 1, EHS)
More informationMunicipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Resources Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014
Municipal Heritage Bridges Cultural, Heritage and Archaeological Assessment Checklist Revised April 11, 2014 This checklist was prepared in March 2013 by the Municipal Engineers Association to assist with
More informationIvol Buildings, Woodcote Road, South Stoke, Oxfordshire
Ivol Buildings, Woodcote Road, South Stoke, Oxfordshire An Archaeological Watching Brief For Christ Church, Oxford by Pamela Jenkins Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code IBSS 04/03 March
More informationLand at Downsview Avenue, Storrington, West Sussex
Land at Downsview Avenue, Storrington, West Sussex An Archaeological Evaluation for Bellwinch Homes Limited by Andy Taylor Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code DAS 04/21 March 2004 Summary
More informationAPPENDIX G. Historical Resources Overview Documentation
APPENDIX G Historical Resources Overview Documentation Statement of Justification for Historical Resources Act Requirements for projects other than small-scale oil and gas This document contains sensitive
More informationTHAT Site Development Application DA (Villa Charities Inc./Villa Colombo DiPoce Campus) BE APPROVED, subject to the following conditions:
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JUNE 16, 2003 SITE DEVELOPMENT FILE DA.02.058 VILLA CHARITIES INC./VILLA COLOMBO DIPOCE CAMPUS Recommendation The Commissioner of Planning recommends: THAT Site Development Application
More information9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED
9 CITY OF VAUGHAN OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 631 - BOCA EAST INVESTMENTS LIMITED The Planning and Economic Development Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations contained in the following
More informationSpadina Subway Extension Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment
Spadina Subway Extension Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental Assessment APPENDIX G ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Spadina Subway Extension Downsview Station to Steeles Avenue Environmental
More informationARCHAEOLOGIX INC. 14 Oxford Street West, London ON N6H 1P9 ~ T: (519) F: (519) ~
ARCHAEOLOGIX INC. 14 Oxford Street West, London ON N6H 1P9 ~ T: (519)642-7836 F: (519) 642-7733 ~ jimarch@rogers.com Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1, 2 & 3), Addendum Report Lowndes Holdings Corp.,
More informationApplicant: GIUSEPPE AND PALMA LOCONTE ISLINGTON AVENUE, WOODBRIDGE
File: A071/14 Item # 23 Ward #1 Applicant: GIUSEPPE AND PALMA LOCONTE Address: Agent: 10519 ISLINGTON AVENUE, WOODBRIDGE JOE DI GIUSEPPE Adjournment Status: PREVIOUSLY ADJOURNED FROM THE MAR 27, 2014 MEETING.
More informationProvincial Heritage Places Recognition Program
Prince Edward Island Provincial Heritage Places Recognition Program A guide for heritage property owners Contents 1 1) Contents 2) The Island s Heritage 3) Historic Places Initiative 4) Heritage Recognition
More information3. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT FILE Z P FERMA PROPERTIES LIMITED PRELIMINARY REPORT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (PUBLIC HEARING) JUNE 20, 2005 3. ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT FILE Z.05.017 P.2005.41 FERMA PROPERTIES LIMITED PRELIMINARY REPORT Recommendation The Commissioner of Planning recommends:
More informationSubmitted to. Canada Building Materials Company 55 Industrial Street, Toronto, Ontario, M4G 3W9 Phone: (416) , Fax: (416)
Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1 & 2) Huxley Pit Part of Lots 29 and 30, Concession 8 Geographic Township of Erin, Town of Hillsburgh, Wellington County, Ontario Submitted to Canada Building Materials
More informationand The Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport
Original Report on Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1 & 2) Northgate Land Corp. & Erbsville Kartway Lands Conservation Drive, Part of Lot 28, German Company Tract Geographic Township of Waterloo, City
More informationMeales Farm, Sulhamstead, West Berkshire
Meales Farm, Sulhamstead, West Berkshire An Archaeological Watching Brief For Mr. Robert Astor by Steve Ford Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code CHH02/29 May 2002 Summary Site name: Meales
More informationCommittee of the Whole (Public Hearing) Report
Item:1 Committee of the Whole (Public Hearing) Report DATE: Tuesday, June 05, 2018 WARD: 2 TITLE: OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT FILE OP.17.016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT FILE Z.17.046 IMPORTANNE MARKETING INC.
More informationStation Street/Haig Road Extension Environmental Assessment (EA)Study. Welcome
Station Street/Haig Road Extension Environmental Assessment (EA)Study Welcome Welcome to this Public Information Centre (PIC) meeting. Please record your attendance and obtain a comment sheet at the registration
More informationUrban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home 493 Springbank Drive
Urban Design Brief Woodland Cemetery Funeral Home The Incorporated Synod of the Diocese of Huron April 15, 2016 Urban Design Brief April 15, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1
More informationPurpose of Report...1. Planning Framework Provincial Policy Statement Draft PPS...2. Ontario Heritage Act...3
Cultural Heritage Policy Discussion Paper November 4 th, 2013 Table of Contents Purpose of Report...1 Planning Framework...1 2005 Provincial Policy Statement...1 2012 Draft PPS...2 Ontario Heritage Act...3
More informationAppendix D. Cultural Heritage Assessment Report
Appendix D Cultural Heritage Assessment Report EXISTING CONDITION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPES & BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCES & CLASS EA STUDY AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN MAVIS ROAD FROM COURTNEYPARK DRIVE
More informationAPPENDIX E ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study Burlington / Oakville Interconnecting Water Main Zone 3 Environmental Study Report APPENDIX E APPENDIX E ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION R.V. Anderson Associates
More informationKLEINBURG-NASHVILLE AREA HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY AND PLAN PURSUANT TO PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT
COUNCIL JUNE 23, 2003 KLEINBURG-NASHVILLE AREA HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY AND PLAN PURSUANT TO PART V OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT Recommendation The Commissioner of Planning in consultation with
More informationORIGINAL REPORT: STAGE 1 & 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 4, COUNTY OF WELLINGTON, NOW IN 233 JANEFIELD AVENUE, GUELPH, ONTARIO
ORIGINAL REPORT: STAGE 1 & 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PART OF LOT 9, CONCESSION 4, COUNTY OF WELLINGTON, NOW IN 233 JANEFIELD AVENUE, GUELPH, ONTARIO Submitted to: Rockwater Group PO Box 38017 256 King
More informationArchaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Land at Kent Cottage, 19 Chapel Street, Hythe, Kent
Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Land at Kent Cottage, 19 Chapel Street, Hythe, Kent Planning Application Y13/0463/SH Date of Report: 29/04/2015 Report for Marc Carney SWAT. ARCHAEOLOGY Swale
More informationMinistère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport
Page 1 of 2 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Archaeology Programs Unit Programs and Services Branch Culture Division 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 Tel.: (416) 314-2120 Email: Andrea.Williams@ontario.ca
More informationSummary of Other State Archeological Guidelines
Summary of Other State Archeological Guidelines This is a summary all guidelines for archeology from 17 other states. This information was gathered in order to see what type of guidelines other states
More information2.2.1 Scope of Preliminary Cultural Heritage Landscape Inventory
Cultural Heritage Landscape and Policy Study Page 7 2.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY 2.1 Introduction As part of the City of Vaughan s Official Plan review and associated development of cultural
More informationARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT THE FORMER WATTON GARDEN CENTRE, NORWICH ROAD, WATTON, NORFOLK OCTOBER 2003 (Accession number WAT)
NORTHAMPTONSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGY NORTHAMPTONSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 2003 (Planning Application No: 3PL/1997/048/0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AT THE FORMER WATTON GARDEN CENTRE, NORWICH ROAD, WATTON, NORFOLK
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS Purpose A Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment (CHIA) is a study to identify and evaluate built heritage resources and cultural landscapes in a given
More informationOriginal License Report. Submitted to: MMM Group Ltd 610 Chartwell Road, Suite 300 Oakville, ON L6J 4A9 Phone (905)
STAGE 1-2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE GLEN ROAD PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT ON LOT 4 CONCESSION I FROM THE BAY AND LOT 20 CONCESSION II FROM THE BAY IN THE GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF YORK, YORK COUNTY,
More informationa) buildings, structures and artifacts of historical significance;
12.3.2. Definition Heritage Resources: There are two classes of heritage resources: monumental or landmark heritage that is considered to reflect exemplary architecture and style of a particular area or
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS. Preparation of National Register of Historic Places. Nominations for the following:
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Preparation of National Register of Historic Places Nominations for the following: The Conner Swales Site, The Baumann Village Site, The Bird Point Heaven Village Site, The Wise Village
More informationGUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
GUIDELINES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENTS Purpose The purpose of undertaking a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment, which is provided by the applicant, is to identify and evaluate cultural heritage
More informationMUNICIPALITY OF NORTH GRENVILLE. PROPOSED WATERFRONT TRAILS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ON THE SOUTH BRANCH OF THE RIDEAU RIVER Kemptville, Ontario
MUNICIPALITY OF NORTH GRENVILLE PROPOSED WATERFRONT TRAILS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ON THE SOUTH BRANCH OF THE RIDEAU RIVER Kemptville, Ontario MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, SCHEDULE B Project
More informationBURNT BERRY POND COTTAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGISTRATION
GOVERNMENT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR Department of Environment and Conservation Lands Branch, Land Management Division BURNT BERRY POND COTTAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REGISTRATION
More informationChitty Farmhouse Extension, Wall Lane, Silchester, Hampshire
Chitty Farmhouse Extension, Wall Lane, Silchester, Hampshire An Archaeological Watching Brief For In Touch by Andrew Mundin Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code CFS 08/52 May 2008 Summary
More informationReport on Site Selection SR-0188 SR-0176 SR-0319 SR-0819 SR-0818 SR-0817 SR-0816 SR-0576 SR-0813 SR-0225 SR-0293 SR-0811 SR-0810 SR-0865
EB81Gi SR-188 SR-176 SR-319 SR-819 SR-818 SR-817 SR-576 SR-816 SR-225 SR-813 SR-293 SR-81 SR-811 SR-865 Report on Site Selection. EFDC-S2-1-Rev1 Date: September 216 Scale: 1:12,5 @A3 Content Source: Esri,
More informationMONITORING REPORT: No. 283
MONITORING REPORT: No. 283 Dunluce Castle Visitor Centre Option Site D Magheracross Co. Antrim AE/14/109E Dermot Redmond List of Contents Site Specific Information 1 Account of the Monitoring 2 Discussion
More informationCOMBINED PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY BUILDING/LANDSCAPE AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PLAN
COMBINED PHASE I ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY BUILDING/LANDSCAPE AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PLAN ST. ELIZABETHS HOSPITAL - WEST CAMPUS 2700 MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AVENUE, SE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA [SITE NUMBER
More informationCity of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan
City of Toronto Emery Village Transportation Master Plan May 2009 Emery Village Transportation Master Plan Toronto, ON May 2009 Consulting Inc. 100 York Blvd., Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 Tel:
More informationPG: 82B , Nottingham School House, Nottingham Road
Nottingham (82B-035) Located in southeastern Prince George s County, the community of Nottingham was established when the General Assembly of the Province of Maryland passed the Act for the Advancement
More informationAppendix C Draft Cultural Heritage Self-Assessment DRAFT
Appendix C Draft Cultural Heritage Self-Assessment Whitesand First Nation Cogeneration and Pellet Mill Project Draft Cultural Heritage Self-Assessment Prepared By: Neegan Burnside Ltd. 292 Speedvale Avenue
More informationMcCormick Property Part Lot 12, Concession 2 EHS, Town of Caledon, Region of Peel For Blueland Farms Limited
McCormick Property Part Lot 12, Concession 2 EHS, Town of Caledon, Region of Peel For Blueland Farms Limited BUILT HERITAGE AND CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENTS February 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0
More information5. CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
5. CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT 5.1 CULTURAL HERITAGE BUILT HERITAGE AND CULTURAL LANDSCAPES 5.1.1 Background: Regulatory Framework This cultural heritage assessment considers cultural heritage resources pursuant
More informationCULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES
New Official Plan CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES POLICIES Date March 6, 2009 Distributed at: Livable Oakville Committee, March 9, 2009 Planning Services Department March 2009 1 1 Policy Discussion Paper:
More information1.0 PROJECT REPORT COVER PAGE
1.0 PROJECT REPORT COVER PAGE LICENSEE INFORMATION: Contact Information: Licensee: Ontario Archaeology Licence: Michael B. Henry CD BA FRAI FRSA Southwestern District Office 553 Dufferin Avenue London,
More informationAppendix H. Stage 1 Archaeological Resource Assessment for the Annexed Lands
Wastewater Collection Master Plan City of Barrie October 2013 Final Appendix H Stage 1 Archaeological Resource Assessment for the Annexed Lands Project Number: TP110135 Appendices City of Barrie Secondary
More informationVariance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the Former City of Toronto Municipal Code Bloor Street West (High Park)
Variance from Chapter 297, Signs, of the Former City of Toronto Municipal Code - 2595 Bloor Street West (High Park) (City Council on August 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2000, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)
More informationTAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 6A & 6B: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
TAKANINI STRUCTURE PLAN AREAS 6A & 6B: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Report prepared for Hosken & Associates Ltd By Barry Baquie (MA) Rod Clough (PhD) April 2006 Clough & Associates Ltd heritage@clough.co.nz
More informationCOUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.
COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO. 7 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Image Source: (Word Clip Art Stock Photos, 2011) Date: May, 2015 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 789 Broadway
More informationHERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION. 62 Union Street. Prepared By:
L 3-1 1 Brampton Heritage Board Date: January 18, 2011 HERITAGE REPORT: REASONS FOR HERITAGE DESIGNATION 62 Union Street Prepared By: Prepared by: Antonietta Minichillo, Heritage Coordinator Planning,
More informationHeritage Impact Assessment York Road Environmental Design Study City of Guelph, Ontario APPENDIX A FIGURES. Project Number TP115100
Heritage Impact Assessment York Road Environmental Design Study City of Guelph, Ontario APPENDIX A FIGURES Project Number Appendix A 200 400 600 800 0 1000m C:\Users\cara.howell\Desktop\York.dwg(fig1)*cara.howell*
More informationJune 22, 2018 Project No /2100
June 22, 2018 Project No. /2100 Riotrin Properties (Gloucester 3) Inc. c/o Riocan Management Inc. Riocan Yonge Eglinton Centre 2300 Yonge Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario M4P 1E3 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationArchaeological Monitoring of Land at 29 Royal Pier Road, Gravesend, Kent
Archaeological Monitoring of Land at 29 Royal Pier Road, Gravesend, Kent Site Code ROY/WB/15 Report for Dr Maxted Date of report 06/10/2015 SWAT ARCHAEOLOGY Swale and Thames Archaeological Survey Company
More informationAppendix D DRAFT. Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report. Appendix D
Appendix D Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Report Appendix D REPORT: Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Town of Perth Landfill part Lots 27 and 28, Concession 10, Geographic Township of Elmsley North,
More informationONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD
PL 120483 ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD Applicant/Appellant: 2124123 Ontario Limited Subject: OPA, Rezoning and Draft Plan of Subdivision Municipal Address: 3940 Highway 7 East Municipality: City of Markham
More informationAPPENDIX E. Appendix E Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment
APPENDIX E Appendix E Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment ORIGINAL Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Background Study and Property Inspection Parkside Drive Road Improvements Class Environmental Assessment
More informationCITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014
CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014 Item 6, Report No. 21, of the Committee of the Whole, which was adopted without amendment by the Council of the City of Vaughan on May
More informationLARKIN+ land use planners inc. 849 Gorham Street Newmarket, Ontario Canada L3Y 1L7. Cemeteries. Funeral Homes. June 10, 2014
LARKIN+ land use planners inc. 849 Gorham Street Newmarket, Ontario Canada L3Y 1L7 Phone: (905) 895.0554 Toll Free: (888) 854-0044 Fax: (905) 895-1817 June 10, 2014 Mr. Denis Kelly Regional Clerk Corporate
More informationThe Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:
HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 17, 2016 1. PROPOSED RENOVATIONS AND ADDITION TO 8006 KIPLING AVENUE IN WOODBRIDGE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT, REVISIONS TO PREVIOUS PROPOSAL WARD 2 - VICINITY OF
More informationNorthbury Farm, Castle End Road, Ruscombe, Berkshire
Northbury Farm, Castle End Road, Ruscombe, Berkshire An Archaeological Watching Brief For Sir Colin and Lady Southgate by Danielle Milbank Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code NFR 07/120
More informationPHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ERF 3 ROBERTSON WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE
PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ERF 3 ROBERTSON WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE Prepared for BOLAND ENVIRO Att: Mr Nik Wullschleger PO Box 250 Worcester 6849 Fax: (023) 347 0336 By
More informationStage 1 Archaeological Assessment (Background Study and Property Inspection)
ORIGINAL Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment (Background Study and Property Inspection) Tremaine Road to Highway 407 Class Environmental Assessment Study, Town of Milton, Regional Municipality of Halton,
More information~!VAUGHAN NOV Z November 21, Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1
~!VAUGHAN NOV Z 5 2016 November 21, 2016 Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York 17250 Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1 Dear Mr. Kelly: RE: NEW KIRBY GO STATION IN BLOCK 27
More informationThe Director of Development Planning and Manager of Urban Design and Cultural Heritage recommends:
HERITAGE VAUGHAN COMMITTEE APRIL 26, 2017 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT AND DEMOLITION OF GARAGE 376 STEGMAN S MILL ROAD - KLEINBURG-NASHVILLE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT, DESIGNATED UNDER PART V, ONTARIO HERITAGE
More information