Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport

Transcription

1 APPENDIX B

2 Page 1 of 1 Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Culture Programs Unit Programs and Services Branch Culture Division 401 Bay Street, Suite 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 ArchaeologyReports@ontario.ca Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Unité des programmes culturels Direction des programmes et des services Division de culture 401, rue Bay, bureau 1700 Toronto ON M7A 0A7 ArchaeologyReports@ontario.ca Apr 1, 2015 Philip Woodley (P018) New Directions Archaeology Ltd Sandhill Ancaster ON L9G 4V5 RE: RE: Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled, "STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF WONDERLAND ROAD, CITY OF LONDON, FORMER GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF WESTMINSTER, MIDDLESEX COUNTY ", Dated Jan 16, 2015, Filed with MTCS Toronto Office on Jan 29, 2015, MTCS Project Information Form Number P Dear Mr Woodley: The above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18 has been entered into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports without technical review. 1 Please note that the ministry makes no representation or warranty as to the completeness, accuracy or quality of reports in the register. Should you require further information, please do not hesitate to send your inquiry to ArchaeologyReports@Ontario.ca. cc. Archaeology Licensing Officer Gillian Thompson,MMM Group Limited Maged Elmadhoon,City of London 1In no way will the ministry be liable for any harm, damages, costs, expenses, losses, claims or actions that may result: (a) if the Report(s) or its recommendations are discovered to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent; or (b) from the issuance of this letter. Further measures may need to be taken in the event that additional artifacts or archaeological sites are identified or the Report(s) is otherwise found to be inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or fraudulent.

3 STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF WONDERLAND ROAD, CITY OF LONDON, FORMER GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF WESTMINSTER, MIDDLESEX COUNTY Original License Report Submitted to: MMM Group Limited 2655 North Sheridan Way, Suite 300 Mississauga, ON Canada L5K 2P8 Phone: Submitted by: New Directions Archaeology Ltd Sandhill Drive, Unit 3 Ancaster, Ontario L9G 4V5 Phone (905) License Holder: Philip Woodley (P018) Project # P January 16, 2015

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report details the Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the proposed future widening of Wonderland Road South, City of London, Former Geographic Township of Westminster, Middlesex County. The Wonderland Road subject corridor project limits are from Southdale Road West to Highway 401 (approximately 7.4 km), and 40 m each side of the existing Wonderland Road Right-of-Way (ROW). The Stage 1 assessment included a background study and visual assessment to determine the potential of the subject corridor for recovering archaeological resources. The subject corridor is along a transportation corridor which is dominated by commercial development in the north and agricultural land use in the south. It is in close proximity to multiple historic roadways and waterways, as well as 31 registered archaeological sites. The Stage 1 assessment visually determined that while sections of the subject corridor exhibit disturbances primarily associated with commercial development, road construction and driveways, undisturbed portions of the subject corridor have been identified beyond the ROW limits. The existing ROW is disturbed from previous road construction activities. Given the high probability of finding archaeological materials within the identified undisturbed portions of the subject corridor, it is recommended to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport that a Stage 2 assessment consisting of either a test-pit survey at a 5 m interval of fallow areas, woodlots, and lawns or the pedestrian survey of cultivated fields (dependent on field conditions) is required for all undisturbed portions of the subject corridor. i

5 PROJECT PERSONNEL Project Director Field Director Report Graphics Report Preparation Editor Philip Woodley (P018) Philip Woodley Andrew Turner Andrew Turner Philip Woodley ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS New Directions Archaeology Ltd. would like to thank Gillie Thompson, MMM Group Limited, for providing the plans. ii

6 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... i PROJECT PERSONNEL... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... ii LIST OF FIGURES... iii LIST OF PLATES... iv PROJECT CONTEXT: DEVELOPMENT... 1 PROJECT CONTEXT: HISTORICAL... 1 PROJECT CONTEXT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL... 3 FIELD METHODOLOGY... 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS... 5 RECOMMENDATIONS... 6 REFERENCES... 7 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION... 8 FIGURES... 9 PLATES APPENDIX I: Development Plans for Subject Corridor APPENDIX II: Inventory of Documentary Record LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Location of the subject corridor (NTS map 40 I/14) Figure 2: Location of the subject corridor on 1878 map of Township of Westminster (Page & Co. 1878: 16-17) (Not to scale) Figure 3: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 4: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 5: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 6: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 7: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 8: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 9: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 10: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 11: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation Figure 12: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions, and recommendation iii

7 LIST OF PLATES Plate 1: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing N Plate 2: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing S Plate 3: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing N Plate 4: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 5: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 6: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 7: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 8: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing N Plate 9: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 10: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 11: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 12: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SW Plate 13: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 14: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 15: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NE Plate 16: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 17: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 18: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 19: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW Plate 20: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 21: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing W Plate 22: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Note disturbed due to development, utilities Plate 23: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Note disturbed due to development, utilities Plate 24: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE Plate 25: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Note disturbed due to development, utilities Plate 26: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Note disturbed due to development, utilities Plate 27: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Note disturbed due to development, utilities iv

8 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 1 PROJECT CONTEXT: DEVELOPMENT This report discusses the rationale, methods and results of the Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the proposed future widening of Wonderland Road South, Part of Lots 35 and 36, Concession 2; Part of Lot 24, Concession 3, 4 and 5; Part of Lot 23, Concession 6; and Lots 59 to 70 East of Talbot Rd, City of London, Former Geographic Township of Westminster, Middlesex County. The Wonderland Road subject corridor project limits are from Southdale Road West to Highway 401 (approximately 7.4 km), and 40 m each side of the existing Wonderland Road Right of Way (Figure 1). The assessment was undertaken on behalf of MMM Group Limited for the City of London as part of the Class Environmental Assessment for the future development of Wonderland Road. Stage 1 is the background study of archaeological sites located within or near the subject corridor and visual assessment of the subject corridor to assess archaeological potential. For this aspect of the project, the archaeological site registry database files at the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, in Toronto will be examined to determine if there are any registered archaeological sites located within or near the subject corridor. Historic documents will also be examined to determine if any possible historic sites are located within the project limits, as well as to determine the proximity of historic transportation routes. Assessment activities were conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990, c.o. 18) in compliance with the Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (2011) under an archaeological consulting license (#P018) issued to Philip Woodley of New Directions Archaeology Ltd. Permission to access for the visual assessment was granted by the City of London. The field notes, photos and related documents will be curated at the office of New Directions Archaeology Ltd. PROJECT CONTEXT: HISTORICAL The subject corridor is located in the Township of Westminster in what was originally Middlesex County, but is now part of the City of London. The first permanent settlement in Middlesex County was at Delaware Village near the Thames River, and began in 1793 (H. R. Page & Co. 1878: 5). From there, the first road was constructed and opened and extended to Chatham, and in 1812 was used for the passage of artillery and baggage (H. R. Page & Co. 1878: 5-6). Steady settlement in the County did not increase until after the War of 1812.

9 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 2 Westminster Township, south-central Middlesex County, is the second oldest settled township in Middlesex. Most of the earlier settlers were farmers and patents were issued in Westminster as early as 1812 (H. R. Page & Co. 1878). Westminster historically encompassed several small villages: Lambeth, Glanworth, Belmont, Nilestown, Byron, and New Brighton (H. R. Page & Co. 1878). An examination or the 1878 map of the Township of Westminster (Page and Co.1878: 16-17) reveals that the subject corridor, at this time, runs through Part of Lots 35 and 36, Concession 2; Part of Lot 24, Concession 3, 4 and 5; Part of Lot 23, Concession 6; and Part of Lots 59 to 70 East of Talbot Road. Table 1 lists the property owners by lot and concession, as well as any houses, orchards, or other points of interest indicated on the 1878 map of the Township of Westminster. Due to the narrow nature of the subject corridor, many of the structures on the properties fall far outside the project limits and as such were not included in Table 1. Even so, multiple farmhouses and orchards fall within or immediately adjacent to the subject corridor. Considering the close proximity of historic structures, presence of major historical roadways, and waterways, there is a high probability of locating historic artifacts in the subject corridor. Table 1: Past Owners by Lot and Concession for Subject Corridor with Number of Structures, Orchards or Other Points of Interest Indicated. Lot Concession Owner(s) Structures, Orchards, Other 35 2 B. Bryant, F.C. White 2 Farmhouses, 2 Orchards 36 2 W. Walter, Walter Nixon 3 Farmhouses, 1 Orchard 24 3 James Davey, J McDonnell 1 Farmhouse, 1 Orchard 24 4 Cha. Gerard, Richard Stephens 3 Farmhouses, 1 Orchard 24 5 Heirs of Wm. McGregor 23 6 Peter Milne, Wm. Forbes 59 East of Talbot Road Rich J. Wilson, John Inglis 60 East of Talbot Road J. K. Little 61 East of Talbot Road J. F. Little 62 East of Talbot Road James Benson Little, Soveski Little 63 East of Talbot Road Henry Mill, William Piper 64 East of Talbot Road Hiram Jones, Isaac Hunt, Waller Hunt 65 East of Talbot Road Jones, Dav Jones 66 East of Talbot Road Hiram Jones Jr. 67 East of Talbot Road Hiram Jones Jr. 68 East of Talbot Road Richard Thomas 69 East of Talbot Road Heirs of S. Nichol, J.J. Lancaster M.D., E. Disbro 70 East of Talbot Road James Swift 1 Farmhouse, 1 Orchard

10 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 3 PROJECT CONTEXT: ARCHAEOLOGICAL The subject corridor is located along Wonderland Road South, Part of Lots 35 and 36, Concession 2; Part of Lot 24, Concession 3, 4 and 5; Part of Lot 23, Concession 6; and Lots 59 to 70 East of Talbot Rd, City of London, Former Geographic Township of Westminster, Middlesex County. The subject corridor is dominated by commercial land use in the north, and agricultural land in the south. The Stage 1 visual assessment was conducted on November 20th, 2013 under cool and sunny conditions. The subject corridor is located on the Mount Elgin Ridges physiographic region (Chapman and Putnam 1984: 144). The topography of the Mount Elgin Ridges consists of successions of ridges (950 to 1,000 feet a.s.l) and vales ( feet a.s.l.) (Chapman and Putnam 1984). The vales are alluvium of gravel, sand or silt while the ridges are comprised of pale brown calcareous clay or silty clay (Chapman and Putnam 1984). The topography of the subject corridor is fairly flat to gently undulating and is mostly farmland in the south with some commercial development in the north. A survey of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport archaeological site registry database files in Toronto revealed that there are 31 registered sites within 1 km of the subject corridor. In addition, an examination of the subject corridor using Ontario Base Mapping (OBM) 1: was performed to identify potential. In summary, only three of the sites have an undetermined temporal or cultural affiliation, and four an undetermined site type. Of the sites with a determined temporal or cultural affiliation, 25 can be classified under Pre-Contact (with further divisions within this category; Late Archaic, Woodland, Late Woodland, etc.), two as strictly Euro Canadian, and one site that had both Pre-Contact and Euro Canadian components. Ten of the 27 with site type listed are identified as campsites, six as hamlets, five as findspots, three as lithic scatters, one as a longhouse, one as a homestead and one as a village. Given the amount of sites within the vicinity, as well as the abundant waterways (both for potable water and transportation), there is a high potential for locating archaeological material within the subject corridor.

11 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 4 Table 2. Registered Archaeological Sites Within 1 km of the Subject Corridor* Borden Number Site Name Temporal or Cultural Affiliation Type of Site AfHh-3 Thomas Power - - Line AfHh-5 Wodrich - - AfHh-11 Dale - - AfHh-12 Ontario Hydro Pre-Contact Lithic Scatter Tower 30 AfHh-24 Pincombe 2 Woodland Hamlet AfHh-25 - Pre-Contact Campsite AfHh-26 Pincombe 3 Pre-Contact, Euro Canadian Campsite AfHh-27 Pincombe 1 Late Woodland, Neutral Village AfHh-30 Pincombe 4 Pre-Contact Campsite AfHh-31 - Early Woodland, Adena Campsite AfHh-32 - Late Woodland, Iroquoian Findspot AfHh-33 - Late Woodland, Iroquioan Findspot AfHh-34 - Pre-Contact Campsite AfHh-43 - Pre-Contact Campsite AfHh-65 Cassandra Late Woodland Hamlet AfHh-66 Matthew William Late Woodland Hamlet AfHh-67 Little Willow Pre-Contact Campsite AfHh-68 Missing Late Woodland Campsite AfHh-69 Marna Late Woodland Hamlet AfHh-70 Grant Late Woodland Hamlet AfHh-71 Pincombe 5 Late Woodland Campsite AfHh-72 Pincombe 6 Late Woodland Longhouse AfHh-74 Radio Tower Woodland Hamlet AfHh-75 Corvette Pre-Contact Campsite AfHh-217 Alice Pre-Contact Lithic Scatter AfHh-227 Field of Dreams Late Archaic Findspot AfHh-286 Worldwide Pitch N Putt PreContact Findspot AfHh Early Archaic Findspot AfHh Euro Canadian - AfHh Pre-Contact Lithic Scatter AfHh Euro Canadian Homestead *Information is from the MTCS Archaeological Site Registry Database, Toronto. FIELD METHODOLOGY The Stage 1 visual assessment was conducted on November 20th, 2013 under cool and sunny conditions resulting in excellent visibility. The entire subject corridor was visually assessed and photo documented, and the details of the field survey are presented in Figures 3 to 12. The digital copy of the aerial mapping is the most accurate digital mapping available and has been provided to indicate field methodology. The Stage 1 assessment determined that much of the northern portion of the subject corridor has been disturbed by commercial development and construction activities (Figures 10-12, Plates 22-23, Plates 25-27), with additional disturbance where Highway 402 transects Wonderland Road (Figures 6 and 7). The remainder of the subject corridor is vacant lots or agricultural land and appears to be undisturbed (Figures 3 to 11, Plates

12 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London , Plate 24). A stage 2 assessment will be required for these identified undisturbed areas within the subject corridor. A pedestrian survey may be feasible for agricultural fields, depending on field conditions. Test pit survey would be required for the woodlots, residential properties, and fallow or agricultural fields that are unable to be ploughed. The test pit survey would be conducted at a 5 m interval with all soil shoveled into a 6 mm mesh and screened for artifacts, with all the test pits backfilled. Each test pit will need to be approximately 30 cm in diameter and hand excavated 5 cm into potential subsoil with the profiles of each test pit examined for stratified layers and/or disturbance. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport has provided a 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists to assist in identifying archaeological potential. Under these guidelines all property is identified as having archaeological potential that is within: 300 m of registered archaeological sites; 300 m of water sources (primary, secondary, historic and glacial); elevated topography; well drained soils; distinctive land formations; resource areas (food, medicinal plants, source raw materials and early Euro-Canadian industry); 100 m of early Euro-Canadian settlement; 100 m of historic transportation routes; areas containing Ontario Heritage designated properties; and properties identified by local informants as having potential (MTCS 2011: 17-18). The subject corridor meets several of these criteria. The subject corridor is located along Wonderland Road, bounded by Southdale Road West and Highway 401, in an area of early Euro-Canadian settlement. It appears to be in close proximity to water sources and historic transportation routes (roads, tributaries) (Figure 2). As previously discussed, 31 registered archaeological sites are located near the study corridor. While portions of the subject corridor in the north have been disturbed by commercial development and a section has been disturbed by Highway 402 transecting Wonderland Road, much of the rest of the subject corridor appears undisturbed. Given the high probability of finding archaeological materials within undisturbed portions of the subject corridor it is recommended to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport that a Stage 2 assessment will be required for identified undisturbed areas (Figures 3-11). The Stage 2 assessment would consist of either a test-pit survey of fallow areas, woodlots and lawns, for the pedestrian survey of cultivated fields (dependent on field conditions) for all undisturbed portions of the subject corridor.

13 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 6 RECOMMENDATIONS On the basis of the above information, the following recommendations can be made: 1. Stage 1 archaeological assessment of the proposed future widening of Wonderland Road South, Part of Lots 35 and 36, Concession 2; Part of Lot 24, Concession 3, 4 and 5; Part of Lot 23, Concession 6; and Lots 59 to 70 East of Talbot Rd, City of London, Former Geographic Township of Westminster, Middlesex County determined that the study area is in close proximity to areas of archaeological potential and therefore the potential for recovering archaeological materials is high. Given this, it is recommended to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport that a Stage 2 archaeological assessment be required for all undisturbed areas within the subject corridor. This would involve either a test-pit survey of fallow areas, woodlots, and lawns or a pedestrian survey of cultivated fields, dependent on field conditions, in order to identify all archaeological resources or materials that may be present. Both the test-pit survey and pedestrian survey would be conducted at a 5 m interval and for the test-pit survey all soil would be shoveled into 6 mm mesh and screened for artifacts and the test-pits backfilled. 2. The remainder of the subject corridor has been identified as disturbed due to commercial development and road construction. Given this, it is recommended to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport that the remainder of this subject corridor is disturbed and that no further archaeological assessment is required. 3. Construction should not proceed before receiving confirmation that the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport has entered the report into the provincial register of reports. This report is filed with the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport in compliance with sec. 65 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The ministry reviews reports to ensure that the licensee has met the terms and conditions of the license and archaeological resources have been identified and documented according to the standards and guidelines set by the ministry, ensuring the conservation, protection and preservation of the heritage of Ontario. 4. Should previously unknown or unassessed deeply buried archaeological resources be uncovered during development, they may be a new archaeological site and therefore subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteration of the site immediately and engage a licensed archaeologist to carry out archaeological fieldwork, in compliance with sec. 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. 5. Any person discovering human remains must immediately notify the police or coroner and the Registrar of Cemeteries, Ministry of Government Services. Contacts: Culture Unit, Programs and Services, Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport: (416) Registrar of Cemeteries, Cemeteries Regulation Unit: Michael D Mello (416) or (416)

14 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 7 REFERENCES Chapman, L.J. and D.F. Putnam 1984 The Physiography of Southern Ontario, Third Edition. Ontario Geological Survey Special Volume 2, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto. Government of Ontario 1990 The Heritage Act RSO Queen s Printer, Toronto Planning Act SO Queen s Printer, Toronto. Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport 1993 Archaeological Assessment Technical Guidelines (Stages 1-3 & Reporting Format). Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Recreation, Cultural Programs Branch, Archaeology and Heritage Planning, Toronto Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists. Ministry of Tourism and Culture, Queen s Printer, Toronto Archaeological Site Registry Database. Toronto. Page, H.R., and Co Illustrated Historical Atlas of Middlesex County. Toronto.

15 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 8 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION 1. This report is submitted to the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c The report is reviewed to ensure that it complies with the standards and guidelines that are issued by the Minister, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations ensure the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario. When all matters relating to archaeological sites within the project area of a development proposal have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, a letter will be issued by the ministry stating that there are no further concerns with regard to alteration to archaeological sites by the proposed development. 2. It is an offence under Sections 48 and 69 of the Ontario Heritage Act for any party other than a licensed archaeologist to make any alteration to a known archaeological site or to remove any artifact or other physical evidence of past human use or activity from the site, until such times as a licensed archaeologist has completed archaeological fieldwork on the site, submitted a report to the Minister stating that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest, and the report has been filed in the Ontario Public Register of Archaeology Reports referred to in Section 65.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 3. Should previously undocumented archaeological resources be discovered, they may be a new archaeological site and therefore subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteration of the site immediately and engage a licensed consultant archaeologist to carry out archaeological fieldwork, in compliance with Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. 4. The Cemeteries Act, R.S.O c. C.4 and the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.33 (when proclaimed in force) require that any person discovering human remains must notify the police or coroner and the Registrar of Cemeteries at the Ministry of Consumer Services.

16 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 9 FIGURES Figure 1: Location of the subject corridor (NTS map 40 I/14).

17 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 10 Figure 2: Location of the subject corridor on 1878 map of Township of Westminster (Page & Co. 1878: 16-17) (Not to scale).

18 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 11 Figure 3: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

19 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 12 Figure 4: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

20 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 13 Figure 5: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

21 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 14 Figure 6: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

22 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 15 Figure 7: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

23 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 16 Figure 8: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

24 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 17 Figure 9: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

25 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 18 Figure 10: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

26 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 19 Figure 11: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

27 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 20 Figure 12: Development plan (2013) indicating existing ROW and 40 m buffer, with plate locations and directions.

28 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 21 PLATES Plate 1: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing N. Plate 2: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing S. Plate 3: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing N. Plate 4: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Plate 5: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Plate 6: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE.

29 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 22 Plate 7: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Plate 8: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing N. Plate 9: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Plate 10: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Plate 11: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Plate 12: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SW.

30 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 23 Plate 13: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Plate 14: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Plate 15: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NE. Plate 16: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Plate 17: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Plate 18: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW.

31 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 24 Plate 19: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Plate 20: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Plate 21: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing W. Plate 22: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Note disturbed due to development, utilities. Plate 23: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Note disturbed due to development, utilities. Plate 24: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE.

32 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 25 Plate 25: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing NW. Note disturbed due to development, utilities. Plate 26: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Note disturbed due to development, utilities. Plate 27: Field conditions along the subject corridor, view facing SE. Note disturbed due to development, utilities.

33 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 26 APPENDIX I: Development Plans for Subject Corridor

34 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 27

35 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 28

36 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 29

37 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 30

38 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 31

39 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 32

40 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 33

41 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 34

42 Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment of Wonderland Road, London 35

43 New Directions Archaeology Ltd 36 APPENDIX II: Inventory of Documentary Record Assessment Field Documents Total Nature Location Wonderland Road, London, Class EA Photographs 38 Digital On server at 1480 Sandhill Drive, Unit 3, Ancaster; Folder Wonderland Road, Field Notes 10 Digital and Hard Copy Field Maps 10 Digital and Hard Copy London, Class EA On server and on file at 1480 Sandhill Drive, Unit 3, Ancaster; Folder Wonderland Road, London, Class EA On server and on file at 1480 Sandhill Drive, Unit 3, Ancaster; Folder Wonderland Road, London, Class EA