RESOLUTION NO. R2015-XXXX

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "RESOLUTION NO. R2015-XXXX"

Transcription

1 RESOLUTION NO. R2015-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANTECA MAKING FINDINGS AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS AND THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FOR AN ADDENDUM TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE TRAILS SUBDIVISION #3 & #4, WHEREAS, the Manteca City Council at its public hearing of February 17, 2015 considered a Modified Initial Study and Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Amendment and Tentative Subdivision Maps to approve The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 ( ) filed by Northstar Engineering Group, th St., Modesto, CA 95354; and, WHEREAS, the Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 project area is located at 2368 W. Woodward Ave., identified by Assessor s Parcel Numbers (APNs) and ; and, WHEREAS, the project area is located within the Trails of Manteca Subdivision and the current General Plan land use designation for the project area is HDR (High Density Residential), which requires an amendment to the General Plan land use designation for consistency with the project proposal; and, WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a General Plan Amendment for a portion of the project area, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto, to be changed from HDR (High Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential); and, WHEREAS, The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 includes the subdivision of approximately 12.1 acres into 62 residential lots and 14.4 acres into 66 residential lots; and, WHEREAS, The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 includes a Planned Development Amendment to amend the existing Planned Development; and, WHEREAS, a Modified Initial Study and Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Trails of Manteca Project considered the requested General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Planned Development Amendment, Two Tentative Subdivision Maps, & Development Agreement and was prepared and considered by the Manteca City Council in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,

2 WHEREAS, the Manteca Planning Commission at its public hearing of January 27, 2015, considered the General Plan Amendment, Rezone, Planned Development Amendment, Tentative Subdivision Maps, Development Agreement and the filing of a Notice of Determination for an Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report as adequate Environmental Documentation for The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4, ; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Manteca City Council recognizes the appropriateness of the Modified Initial Study and the filing of a Notice of Determination for an Addendum to the EIR as adequate Environmental Documentation for the Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 and hereby adopts the Notice of Determination for the Addendum to the EIR ( ) based on the following findings: 1. The City Council has reviewed the information contained in the Modified Initial Study and Addendum to the EIR for The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 Project. 2. The Modified Initial Study and Addendum to the Environmental Impact Report represents the independent judgment of the City. 3. The Modified Initial Study and Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Trails of Manteca project serves as adequate environmental documentation for the project, and was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 4. An addendum is the appropriate environmental document for this project because the following conditions not calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred: Substantial changes are not proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; Substantial changes did not occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or New information of substantial importance does not show any of the following: i. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; ii. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; iii. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or

3 iv. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Manteca City Council recognizes the appropriateness of the General Plan Amendment and in accordance with Chapter of the Manteca Zoning Ordinance and hereby approves the General Plan Amendment for The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 based on the following findings: 1. It is found that a change in land use designation, as shown in Exhibit A, is required for the project site to be developed as Low Density Residential. 2. It is further found that development of the project at this location is supported by the following General Plan land use policies: Policy LU-P-1: Growth shall mitigate its own impacts and shall provide a positive benefit to the City of Manteca. Policy LU-P-2: Growth must contribute to a strong diversified economic base and an effective balance between employment and housing opportunities for all income levels. Policy LU-P-48: Storm drainage systems within new development areas should include open drainage corridors, where feasible, that would provide bike and pedestrian paths, and visual open space within neighborhoods. The pedestrian connection should link parks and open space to residential neighborhoods. Policy LU-P-46: The City shall allow for higher density housing opportunities along major streets so as to provide residents with access to the public transit system. 3. It is found that the General Plan Amendment is consistent with the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare in that the residential development encourages the right type of residential density within the areas of the City that are far from public services. 4. The City Council determined a favorable recommendation to the Manteca City Council regarding the appropriateness of this General Plan Amendment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Manteca City Council recognizes the appropriateness of the Planned Development Amendment and in accordance with Chapter of the Manteca Zoning Ordinance hereby approves the Planned Development Amendment for The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 based on the following findings:

4 1. The Planned Development Amendment was reviewed and conditions are incorporated with this resolution as Exhibit C. 2. The proposed project does not change the boundary of the original Planned Development, Ordinance No. 1493, shown in Exhibit D. 3. It is found that the proposed project incorporates best site planning practices for quality design and compatibility with surroundings. 4. The proposed project shall not be substantially detrimental to adjacent property and will not materially impair the purpose of the Manteca Zoning Ordinance or the public interest. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Manteca City Council recognizes the appropriateness of the Tentative Subdivision Maps and in accordance with Section of the Manteca Municipal Code hereby approves The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 ( ) based on the following findings: 1. The proposed maps were reviewed in conformance with Section of the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Manteca. 2. The Tentative Subdivision Maps are in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act, the City s General Plan, Title 17 Zoning Ordinance, and Title 16 Land Division Ordinance. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of future development. 4. The design of the subdivision maps and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5. The design of the subdivision maps is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6. The maps will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed map. 7. The maps were reviewed and conditioned by the appropriate City Departments, Utilities, and Agencies. 8. The Tentative Subdivision Maps were reviewed and conditions are incorporated with this resolution as Exhibit B. I hereby certify that Resolution NO. R2015-XXXX was passed and adopted by the Manteca City Council at a regularly scheduled public hearing held on February 17, 2015 by the following vote: DATED: ROLL CALL: AYES:

5 NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: STEPHEN F. DEBRUM MAYOR JOANN TILTON, MMC CITY CLERK Exhibits: Exhibit A: General Plan Amendment Map Exhibit B: Conditions of Approval-Trails of Manteca Subdivision, including The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4, TSM Exhibit C: Conditions of Approval-Planned Development Amendment, PDA Exhibit D: Ordinance No. 1493, Original Planned Development Ordinance

6 Exhibit A: General Plan Amendment Current General Plan: Proposed General Plan:

7 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map City of Manteca Community Development Department Conditions of Approval Amended Trails of Manteca Project (including) Tentative Subdivsion Map TSM February 17, 2015 Project File Number: Tentative Subdivision Map TSM Project Name: The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 Project Address: 2368 W. Woodward Ave., Manteca, CA APNs: , & NOTE: The project includes an Environmental Impact Report with Mitigation Measures specific to development of this project site. The Draft and Final EIR including associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, Statements of Overriding Considerations and Trails of Manteca Addendum #1 are incorporated by reference into this list of conditions. This list of conditions is not intended to be all-inclusive or a comprehensive list of City regulations. All conditions are referenced to The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map (Rev 04/15/2014) and the Trails of Manteca Subdivision on file with the City of Manteca, Community Development Department, Planning Division. This list of conditions includes all previous Conditions of Approval applicable to the Trails of Manteca project and supersedes any previous list. 1) The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 is approved, as shown on the exhibits (dated 04/15/2014) and attachments, and as modified by the following conditions of approval, subject to final review and approval by the City of Manteca. 2) Prior to recordation of final map, the developer shall pay the Williamson Act Contract cancellation fee as determined by the San Joaquin County Assessor s Office. Planning 3) This project is part of, and subject to, the Trails of Manteca Planned Development (Ordinance No. 1493) and PDA , Planned Development Amendment, and shall comply with all applicable conditions. 4) Developer shall include the City s Right-to-Farm ordinance Disclosure Statement with the sale of each property pursuant to Manteca Municipal Code Section ) Developer shall provide all buyers a copy of the City s ordinance regarding the storage/parking of Recreational Vehicles in a residential neighborhood. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 1 of 8

8 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map 6) Developer shall contact the San Joaquin County Council of Governments (SJCOG) to obtain specific requirements on participation in the San Joaquin Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). Developer shall participate in the SJMSCP by scheduling a SJMSCP Biologist to perform a pre-construction survey of the project site prior to any ground disturbance, sign and return incidental take minimization measures to SJMSCP prior to issuance of any building permits. SJMSCP fees shall be paid prior to issuance of each building permit. 7) Removal of mature trees (whether native or introduced), with the exception of planted orchards, associated with this project shall adhere to tree replacement requirements in accordance with the City of Manteca Tree Preservation Guidelines. Engineering 8) Developer shall install all subdivision improvements in accordance with Title 16, Subdivision Ordinance 9) Developer shall submit improvement plans for each phase of onsite to the City Engineer for approval with each final map. 10) Developer shall provide easements, requested by the respective utility companies, within the subdivision and shall show said easements on the final map. 11) Any existing on-site facilities to the project that are affected by this project shall be relocated or placed underground at the developer s expense. 12) Developer shall dedicate ten-foot (10) wide public utility easements on all street frontages for underground facilities and appurtenances, upon approval and recordation of each final map. 13) Developer shall contact the local post office for direction regarding placement of mail receptacles or any other type of mail delivery proposed. 14) Developer shall contact Manteca Unified School District Facilities Planning regarding school fees and requirements. Developer shall annex the project to a Manteca Unified School District Community Facilities District, upon approval and recordation of the first final map. 15) Developer shall obtain appropriate encroachment permit(s) for any work required within the City of Manteca or San Joaquin County rights-of-way. 16) During all construction phases, Developer shall comply with city laws regarding dust control, developer shall also comply with all applicable San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Regulations as outlined in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 17) The following traffic indices are recommended: Woodward Ave ' right-of-ways ' right-of-ways 4.5 cul-de-sacs ) Soils R-Value tests shall be taken in the vicinity of: Lot 379 Unit 4 Lot 429 Unit 4 Lot 342 Unit 4 Lot 15 Unit 3 Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 2 of 8

9 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map Lot 76 Unit 3 Lot 47 Unit 3 Lot numbers according to 7/28/2014 overall Lotting Plan Map. A report shall be submitted to the City Engineer with calculations determining the street structural design. Street structural design shall be in conformance with Resolution R-5633, "Street Structural Design Policy". In accordance with Conditions 4 and 5 of said Resolution R-5633, the minimum structural cross-section shall be 2 1/2 inches asphalt concrete over 4 inches of aggregate base. 19) Developer shall install all streetlights to City Standards enabling the street lighting system to be placed on the P.G.&E. LS-2A energy rate schedule prior to final occupancy of the first home. Street lighting provided within the Project along the residential streets, excluding the lighting along Woodward Avenue and Tara Park Drive, shall be decorative per the review and approval of the Public Works and Community Development Directors. The streetlight maintenance shall be included in a landscaping, lighting, and maintenance district to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments. 20) Developer shall provide bicycle facilities along Woodward Avenue in compliance with the City of Manteca's Bicycle Route Master Plan. 21) All masonry walls shall be decorative reinforced, solid grout filled and constructed at the site (No prefabricated walls). The City shall have the right to approve wall design, masonry block style and color. The wall height shall step down to forty-two (42) inches high in the front building set back areas. 22) A six-foot (6') high chain link fence, extending from building set back line to building set back line, across all streets stubbed to undeveloped land; 23) Developer shall construct a sanitary sewer pump station, at the northeast corner of the subdivision, capable of handling all flows from the Trails plus 227,000 gallons per day from other properties. The wet well pipe invert shall be no higher than -0.5 feet in elevation based on the City s datum. Developer shall also install an 18-inch diameter gravity pipeline from The Trails pump station to the Tara Park pump station. 24) Offsite improvements shall comply with the latest version of the City Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (December 2010). 25) A preliminary sewer plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to final improvement plan submittal. The plan shall be accompanied by calculations for peak wet weather flows showing pipe sizes and slopes for the entire development. 26) Developer shall install an 8-inch diameter reclaimed water (purple pipe) pipeline stub from the in-tract reclaimed water distribution network located north of the levee and extending to Woodward Avenue. Irrigation of common areas in the area developed north of the levee shall be piped with reclaimed water (purple pipe) pipeline. With the exception of storm water, no reclaimed water, no Eckert water and no other waste water, treated or otherwise shall be applied or stored south of the RD-17 levee within the Trails Project Area. The project area includes the Trails of Manteca Subdivision (SDJ ), The Trails Subdivision #2 (TSM ) and The Trails Subdivision #3 & #4 (TSM ) which includes three separate parcels (APNs: , & ) totaling approximately acres. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 3 of 8

10 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map 27) The Water System Analysis for The Trails at Manteca development has been completed. Installation of the following water system improvements are required: a) Install a twelve (12) inch water main in Woodward Avenue extending from Dutra Estates to the south boundary of the subdivision; b) Install a twelve (12) inch water main in Tara Park Drive extending from Woodward Avenue to the south boundary of the subdivision; c) Install a twelve (12) inch water main in appropriate in-tract streets extending from the well to either Woodward Avenue or Tara Park Drive. 28) A water supply analysis has been completed for this development. The analysis shows that this development will generate approximately 2200 gallons per minute (gpm) peak hour demand. Developer shall construct a 2200 gpm minimum capacity well with all appurtenant structures, including water quality treatment if needed. Developer has the option of buying part of the capacity (900 gpm) from the City s one million gallon water storage tank and pump station facility to be constructed at the City s Well 26 site. If Developer buys capacity outside of the subdivision, well size shall be adjusted accordingly. 29) All storm drain improvements shall comply with the latest edition of the City of Manteca Storm Drain Master Plan and the City of Manteca Standard Plans and Specifications. 30) Storm Drainage: a) The stormwater storage system shall be designed as a controlled pumped or gated discharge allowing discharge only when capacity is available in: A) the Walthall Slough, B) South San Joaquin Irrigation District (S.S.J.I.D) facilities, or C) other terminal land disposal facility provided by developer. Any solution other than discharge to Walthall Slough will require additional environmental approval. b) Provide a monitoring system for chosen outfall to provide a telemetric control system of the pump discharge. The City of Manteca shall have access to and control over the system. Telemetry shall include installation of hardware to interface with the City's "Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition" (SCADA) system. The property owner shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City for the maintenance of the telemetry control facilities. c) Developer shall obtain all necessary permits for storm drain discharge d) The storm drain basin outlet, either by gravity or pump, shall empty the basin within 96 hours. The proposed basins, pumps and pipes shall be designed to handle stormwater runoff from the onsite and offsite tributary areas. e) Developer shall oversize storm drain facilities (excluding detention basins) through the project to provide for an additional 20 cubic feet per second of drainage generated offsite. 31) Developer shall obtain all necessary permits for storm drain discharge to Walthall Slough. 32) The storm drain basin outlet, either by gravity or pump, shall empty the basin with 96 hours. The proposed basins, pumps and pipes shall be designed to handle stormwater runoff from the onsite and offsite tributary areas. 33) Developer shall oversize storm drain facilities (excluding detention basins) through the project to provide for an additional 20 cubic feet per second of drainage generated offsite. 34) The maximum side slopes of the basins shall be 6 to 1 (horizontal to vertical), the basin bottom elevation shall be a minimum of two feet above the seasonal high groundwater elevation, and the basin shall have a maximum water depth of five feet. 35) Developer shall pay the cost to seed the basin lawn and install the landscape irrigation system with automatic controllers. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 4 of 8

11 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map 36) Prior to any construction activity on this project, the Developer shall meet the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), administered by the California State Water Resources Control Board. A copy of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted to the City for acceptance. For permit information, contact the Board at: State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) - Division of Water Quality PO Box 1977, Sacramento, CA Attn: Storm Water Permitting Section - Telephone No. (916) ) The SWPPP shall comply with the latest NPDES Construction General Permit (Order No DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002). 38) The property owner shall submit Notice of Intent (NOI), Stormwater Annual Reports, Notice of Termination (NOT), and any SWPPP related documents to SWRCB through the Storm Water Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS). 39) All drain inlets shall be marked "No Dumping Drains to River." Drain markers shall be purchased from the City of Manteca, at cost plus 15% administrative charge, and installed by the Developer prior to acceptance of the improvements. 40) A preliminary storm drain plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to final improvement plan submittal. The plan shall be accompanied by calculations for peak flows, total runoff, pipe sizes, and detention basin volume. All design is to be in accordance with the City of Manteca Storm Drain Master Plan. Also include evidence of groundwater depth. 41) The developer shall include provisions for stormwater quality treatment. Locations and types of treatment facilities shall be indicated on the improvement plans. This project shall be designed to meet the water quality treatment requirements of the City of Manteca NPDES permit attachment 4 requirements. 42) Development must comply with the Design Standards in Chapter 6, Stormwater Quality, in the City of Manteca 2006 Storm Drain Master Plan Update. Copies of the Master Plan are available on a CD in the City of Manteca Public Works office. 43) Provide treatment for 85% of annual runoff (treat to remove petroleum hydrocarbons) per the Manteca 2006 Storm Drain Master Plan Update, Chapter 3, Section Flow Based Treatment. Location and types of treatment facilities shall be indicated on the improvement plans. Copies of the Master Plan are available on a CD in the City of Manteca Public Works office. 44) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, property owner shall enter into an agreement with the City agreeing to maintain the onsite drainage treatment system(s) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board. Said agreement shall be prepared by the City. 45) Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following shall be submitted by the developer and approved by the Public Works Department: a) On-site grading and drainage plan. b) On-site utility (sanitary sewer, water and storm drain) plan. c) Off-site improvement plan. d) Erosion control plans. e) Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 5 of 8

12 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map The plans specified in (a), (b) and (c) above shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. The SWPPP in (e) above shall be prepared by a Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). 46) Reimbursement shall be in the form of credit against PFIP Sanitary Sewer, Water System, Storm Drainage, and Transportation fees. The credit will be given when building permits are issued for construction of residences within The Trails at Manteca subdivision. If the cost to construct said improvements exceeds the value of PFIP credits, the remainder shall be reimbursed after the City receives sufficient PFIP Development Fee revenue from development occurring within the same PFIP financing zones. Developer shall have the right to participate in either the Public Facilities Implementation Plan (PFIP) or the Public Facilities Fee (PFF) program regarding construction and financing of infrastructure improvements. 47) Developer shall pay the City s cost to form a Community Facilities District for the maintenance of subdivision amenities to include but not limited to the following: landscaping, landscape irrigation, decorative street lights and sound walls located within the public right of way and the parks/basins. 48) Cul-de-sac lots shall have a minimum of 45 feet of frontage, measured along the arc at the street right of way line. 49) Water service provided from alley way is prohibited. Parks and Recreation General: 50) All landscape needs to comply with new AB1881 requirements. Park/Storm Basin: 51) Prior to final map the final design and phasing plan for the park improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks & Recreation Department and Community Development Department prior to approval of first final map to ensure adequacy of facilities to be installed. Provide minimum of 1 acre of upland area (above the stormwater 48 hour/100-year flood line) for parks and recreation amenities/improvements, with dimensions acceptable to the Parks and Recreation Department. 52) Park improvements shall generally include, but not limited to: turf, trees, cross ripping of basin bottom, irrigation system with irrigation well, finish grading and landscape soil preparation, landscaping, pumps/electrical cabinets/backflow devices (all to be screened from public view), 8 concrete walkways, drinking fountains, site furniture (benches, trash receptacles, bike racks, picnic tables, grills, etc.), basketball court or ½ court, area security lighting, low (4 ) decorative/safety fencing, park identification signs, baseball backstop, maximum basin side slopes of 8:1, and play areas: 1 school age and 1 tot lot (separate areas in conformance with the California Public Playground Safety Regulations of 2000 and current Federal CPSC Playground Safety Guidelines. Play areas to include: excavated play pits and prepared sub-base (sized appropriately), concrete perimeter curbing, surface cushioning material and play equipment per Parks and Recreation. 53) Developer shall prepare construction plans and specifications for park improvements for Parks and Recreation Departments approval, at developer s expense. 54) Design with the goal of engineering and physical solutions to treating storm water to not diminish the recreational function or net useable park space within the park/basin. 55) Locations of in-ground and above-ground utility structures within park/basin subject to prior review and approval of Parks and Recreation Department. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 6 of 8

13 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map 56) Developer shall design and construct park improvements and will be provided with neighborhood park fee credits (at building permit) limited to the actual cost of park design and improvements. 57) Park improvements shall be included in the Community Facilities District to provide resources for landscape and park maintenance costs as per the requirements listed under CFD formation requirements. 58) Park improvements and maintenance funding mechanism shall be governed by the City of Manteca Parkland Construction Policy. Streetscapes/Medians/Roundabouts: 59) Developer shall construct all streetscapes, entry landscaping, roundabout landscape and median landscapes to city standards. 60) Streetscape/Median/Roundabout improvements shall be included in the Landscape Maintenance District to provide resources for landscape and park maintenance costs as per the requirements listed under CFD formation requirements. 61) In areas where SSJID pipeline easements are located within the boundaries of streetscape, medians, roundabouts or landscape areas, SSJID and the City of Manteca Parks & Recreation Department shall both approve landscape plans including tree variety, setbacks, root protection methods, etc. The landscape plans shall not be considered approved until they are signed by the City of Manteca Parks and Recreation Director. 62) Developer shall submit a final street tree plan to the City Arborist for review prior to approval of final map. 63) Developer shall prepare construction plans and specifications for all landscape improvements for Parks and Recreation Departments approval, at developer s expense. 64) No turfgrass is permitted in any streetscapes, unless approved by the Parks & Recreation Department. Community Facilities District (CFD) Formation Requirements: 65) A Community Facilities District (CFD) shall be formed, at the developer s expense, to provide for the maintenance of the park/basin, open spaces and all streetscape/median/roundabout landscape improvements. Funds to form said CFD shall be collected from the developer prior to the issuance of any building permit. Fire 72) All residential address numbers shall be plainly visible from the street fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 73) Per Ordinance #1173, a Fire Facility Permit Fee shall be assessed to all new construction as per Manteca Municipal Code Section ) The Developer shall submit all proposed street names to the Fire Prevention Division for review and written approval prior to the submittal of a final map. 75) Streets and Fire Department Access Drives within the subdivision shall meet City of Manteca Standard for all weather roadways prior to the issuance of any building permits. 76) Fire protection systems (fire hydrants, water mains, etc.) shall be installed, tested and approved by the City prior to the issuance of any Building Permits. 77) Fire hydrants shall be located and installed according to City of Manteca standards. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 7 of 8

14 Exhibit B TSM Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Tentative Subdivision Map 78) During phase construction, any roadway that exceeds 150 with a dead-end, shall have a temporary turn around installed in accordance with the standards of the Manteca Fire Department. This temporary turn around shall be in place until written permission to remove the turn around is granted by the Fire Marshal. 79) All alleys shall be posted NO PARKING in compliance with Manteca Fire Department Standards. Fees 80) Developer is responsible for contacting all affected agencies, and for the timely payment of all applicable fees associated with this project. Reclamation District No ) All setbacks from the levee are required to meet the applicable Reclamation District No. 17 (RD17) standards. Prior to approval of final map, RD17 shall review for compliance with such standards. 82) Improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by RD17 prior to recordation final map. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 8 of 8

15 Exhibit C PDA Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Planned Development Amendment City of Manteca Community Development Department Conditions of Approval Planned Development Amendment PDA February 17, 2015 Project File Number: Planned Development Amendment PDA Project Name: Trails of Manteca Project Address: 2368 W. Woodward Ave., Manteca, CA APNs: & NOTE: The project includes an Environmental Impact Report with Mitigation Measures specific to development of this project site. The Draft and Final EIR including associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, Statements of Overriding Considerations and Trails of Manteca Addendum #1 are incorporated by reference into this list of conditions. This list of conditions includes all previous Conditions of Approval applicable to the Trails of Manteca project and supersedes any previous list. The Planned Development Amenities Plan (prepared by vandertoolen Associates, dated January 3, 2011) is incorporated by reference into this list of conditions. The Planned Development Amenities Plan includes the following details: fencing details, and overall fencing plan for the project area; preliminary planting plan for open space areas; preliminary park layout and amenities plan for Lot D Park, Lot Q Park, Lot W Park; layout and amenities plan for Lot C and I entry & Park; Lot V, E and R open space areas; preliminary street tree plan; site amenities details; and preliminary landscape masterplan. Project approval is also based on Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Measures. 1) Prior to approval of the final map, final design and phasing plan for of all open space, trails, and parks improvements shall be reviewed and approved by Parks & Recreation, Public Works and Community Development Departments. This review will ensure adequacy of facilities installed and completed with each phase of development. 2) Any proposed deviations from the Planned Development Amenities Plan (prepared by vandertoolen Associate, dated January 3, 2011), shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. If it is determined that the requested deviation(s) is/are minor, and in overall compliance with the intent of the approved Planned Development for the Trails of Manteca, an application for a Minor Plan Modification can be applied for to be reviewed by the Community Development Director. If however, the requested deviation(s) from the Planned Development Amenities Plan is determined to be a major deviation from the approval, such as, requesting for removal of specific amenities, then a Planned Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 1 of 2

16 Exhibit C PDA Conditions The Trails #3 & #4 Planned Development Amendment Development Amendment application shall be submitted which will require approval by City Council. 3) Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall prepare and submit Design Guidelines to the Community Development Department under separate application for review and approval that establish the following: a. Building Design Standards shall at a minimum address the following: minimal visual prominence of garages, natural/neutral exterior color scheme; climate responsive and pedestrian-friendly architectural features such as overhangs, canopies, and awnings; building design that uses natural ventilation and is orientated to minimize solar gain and maximize daylight; visually unobstructed installation of solar collectors, etc.; and/or additional standards as determined by the Community Development Director. The approved Building Design Standards shall be incorporated into the proposed project. b. Landscape Design Standards shall be reviewed for compliance with the Planned Development Amenities Plan (prepared by vandertoolen Associates, dated January 3, 2011) and applicable city standards. The final Landscape Design Standards shall at a minimum address the following: a common landscape theme that includes primary street trees along major arterial streets; a street tree program; use of nonfruiting species such as flowering pear and plum as secondary accent trees in landscape corridors along major streets; parking lot trees, or additional standards as determined by the Community Development Department. c. Street Design Standards shall be reviewed by both the Public Works and Community Development Departments. The Street Design Standards shall at a minimum address the following: interconnection between pedestrian and bikeway system and linkage to the Citywide Pedestrian and Bikeway Trail System; street lighting; common landscape theme along major arterial streets, or additional standards as determined by the Community Development Director. d. Homes along Woodward Avenue shall have enhanced rear elevations and features, such as balconies, outdoor California rooms, enhanced roof and chimney elements, and landscaping. Masonry and iron half fences, utilizing ornamental iron as approved by the City, shall be installed at the right-of-way line. Personnel gates shall be installed in the masonry and iron half fences for each lot east of the entry road (Manteca Trails Way) to the subdivision. Personnel gates may be, but are not required to be installed in the masonry and iron half fences for each lot west of the entry road (Manteca Trails Way) to the subdivision. e. Woodward Avenue shall be designed with a five hundred (500 ) foot radius at the northwest corner of the project to accommodate design speeds on Woodward Avenue. Conditions of Approval 02/17/15 Page 2 of 2

17

18

19

20

PLANNING COMMISSION. Submitted

PLANNING COMMISSION. Submitted PLANNING COMMISSION City Hall 1275 Main Street El Centro, CA 92243 Submitted PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ITEM (1844) Meeting: 05/10/16 12:00 AM Department: Community Development Category: Public Hearing

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008 Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:

More information

PC RESOLUTION NO

PC RESOLUTION NO PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-01-14-02 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP fttm) 17441. REZONE {RZ) 13-003, ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL (AC) 13-003, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TRP) 13-052. GRADING PLAN MODIFICATION (GPM) 13-002. CONDITIONAL

More information

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO ATTACHMENT CC-1 ORDINANCE NO. 13-2113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRE AREA FROM PARK AND RECREATION (PR) TO PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PARK (P(MP))

More information

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements CITY OF LANCASTER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, California 93534 (661) 723-6100 SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements Purpose The purpose of a specific plan is to provide for the logical development

More information

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 16-03, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING

More information

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION

CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD Draft RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF ALAMEDA APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION PLN13-0157 TO CONSTRUCT ELEVEN

More information

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST TOWNSHIP OF LOGAN SOIL & FILL IMPORTATION AND PLACEMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Applications: 5 copies of application - Applicant will reproduce the copies at his/her costs. The Township Clerk

More information

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP)

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) 1) Application form and filing fee. Application Form.pdf Development Review Guide STEP 6 of 8 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: FINAL PLAN REVIEW- PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PDP) 2) Transportation Development Review

More information

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707)

CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707) CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G. 1 STAFF REPORT August 4, 2009 Staff Contact: Tricia Shortridge (707) 449-5140 TITLE: REQUEST: LONGS / CVS DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY & REMODEL TIME EXTENSION

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Date: April 5, 2018 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Robert Myers Robert Myers 2955 and 2989 Dauphin Street (Southeast corner of Dauphin Street and Sage Avenue) CITY

More information

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009 North Oakville East November, 2009 POLICY CONTEXT 1) Purpose a) The purpose of this document is to be a guide for the location, configuration, design and development of the parks system for the North Oakville

More information

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016

KASPER. City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development. December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016 KASPER City of Georgetown, Texas PUD Planned Unit Development December 30, 2015 Revised January 27, 2016 Applicant: Sentinel Land Company, LLC 4910 Campus Drive Newport Beach, CA Prepared by: SEC Planning

More information

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: City Staff Date: November 15, 2016 Re: Case #16026 Raymore Activity Center Site Plan GENERAL INFORMATIONaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Applicant/ Property Owner:

More information

that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11,

that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11, TOWN OF EAST GREENBUSH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Town Board of the Town of East Greenbush will hold a public hearing on April 11, 2018, at 5:45 p.m. at the East Greenbush Town

More information

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code

Applicant Name Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code  . Property Owner Phone / Fax / Address City State Zip Code Master Development Plan Application Community Development Department City of Redmond 411 SW 9 th Street Redmond, Oregon 97756 541-923-7721 541-548-0706 FAX Master Development Plan Fee $38,862.52 File Number

More information

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan

Glenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan Implementation 114 9.0 IMPLEMENTATION 9.1 OVERVIEW This chapter summarizes the administrative procedures necessary to implement the proposed land use plan, infrastructure improvements, development standards,

More information

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report March 15, 2007

Planning Commission Staff Report March 15, 2007 Planning Commission Staff Report Project: Request: Madeira East Tentative Subdivision Map, Design Review for Subdivision Layout & Abandonment of Easements Location: Phase IV of the Laguna Ridge Specific

More information

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS Name of Project: Poulsbo Meadows; A Planned Residential Development (PRD)/Plat Applicants Name: PBH Group LLC/Byron Harris PO Box 1010 Silverdale, WA 98038 Description

More information

Procedures IV. V. Rural Road Design Option

Procedures IV. V. Rural Road Design Option i IV. Procedures A. All applicants required to prepare a Conservation Design Subdivision shall provide the Planning Board with a conceptual conventional subdivision design as well as a proposed layout

More information

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Drexel, Barrell & Co. Drexel, Barrell & Co. June 18, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning

More information

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD QUASI-JUDICIAL CPC AGENDA June 8, 2006 Page 37 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM: C STAFF: ROBERT TEGLER FILE NO: CPC PUD 05-294 - QUASI-JUDICIAL PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: PARKWOOD AT WOLF RANCH NASS DESIGN ASSOCIATES

More information

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Drexel, Barrell & Co. Drexel, Barrell & Co. December 21, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning

More information

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, a primary opportunity identified in the Plan is to Re-Connect the Uncompahgre River:

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, a primary opportunity identified in the Plan is to Re-Connect the Uncompahgre River: ORDINANCE NO. 17 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF RIDGWAY, COLORADO AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER OVERLAY DISTRICT AND CREATING RIVER CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

More information

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDINANCE NO. 2012-4 AMENDING SECTION 27.38.090, OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS, OF CHAPTER 27.38, CBD DISTRICTS-CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, SECTION 27.64.023, PARKING PROHIBITED ON LAWNS, FLOWERS,

More information

The maximum amounts shown in the Engineer s Report for each of those categories for FY 2008/09 are as follows (per house/per year):

The maximum amounts shown in the Engineer s Report for each of those categories for FY 2008/09 are as follows (per house/per year): Agenda Item No. August 28, 2007 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager Dale I. Pfeiffer, Director of Public Works RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS,

More information

TOP TEN LIST OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 42

TOP TEN LIST OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 42 TOP TEN LIST OF COMMUNITY CONCERNS REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 42 1. Extend the urban area to Beltway 8 in stages, over say a three-year period, prioritizing development in transit and declining

More information

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA

CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY 1. PROJECT SUMMARY DATA CHAPTER 2 SUMMARY This is an Initial Study format used to determine, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15177, whether a project 1) is within the scope of a Master EIR (MEIR), 2) may result in additional

More information

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASADENA APPROVING A MASTER PLAN FOR VILLA ESPERANZA WHEREAS, the proposed Master Plan for Villa Esperanza (VE), located at 2116 Villa Street

More information

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist This checklist provides specific requirements that are apart of the Sketch process. The entire process is described by the Huntersville Subdivision Review Process which details all the submittal and resubmittal

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009

Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009 Planning Commission Staff Report February 19, 2009 Project: Warda Warehouse File: EG-08-051 Request: Design Review Location: 9260 Bendel Place APNs: 134-0660-004 Planner: Gerald Park Property Owner/Applicant

More information

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN PROCESS TYPE III IS USED References to Process Type III applications are found in several places in the Milton Municipal Code (MMC), indicating that the development, activity, or use, is permitted

More information

13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road

13. PRELIMINARY PLAT NO MILLS FARM - Vicinity of the southeast corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road 13. corner of 159 th Street and Quivira Road 1. APPLICANT: HNTB Corporation is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat for a 383-lot

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES URBAN SERVICES STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES January 2017 Craig Fulton, P.E., Director TABLE OF CONTENTS "URBAN SERVICES STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES"

More information

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Conduct Public Hearing to vacate certain public right of way adjacent to Sycamore Avenue and San Pablo Avenue STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Adjourned Regular Meeting of December 16, 2014 TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council Holly Smyth, Planning Director Conduct Public Hearing

More information

MEETING DATE: November 12, 2013 SUBJECT: Accept Borden Road Bridge Improvement (CIP No )

MEETING DATE: November 12, 2013 SUBJECT: Accept Borden Road Bridge Improvement (CIP No ) AGENDA REPORT Meeting of the San Marcos City Council MEETING DATE: November 12, 2013 SUBJECT: Accept Borden Road Bridge Improvement (CIP No. 88165) Recommendation Staff recommends the City Council adopt

More information

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN)

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (MASTER PLAN & UNIT PLAN) Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Business License Building Fire Prevention Planning Public Works 707.648.4310 707.648.4374 707.648.4565 707.648.4326 707.651.7151 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

More information

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES:

IMPACT ON FINANCIAL AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES: MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: CITY COUNCIL GEOFF ENGLISH, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS ORDERING THE PREPARATION AND FILING OF ANNUAL ENGINEER S REPORTS FOR THE PARKSIDE

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 & PUD-0000102-2017 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL

More information

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City certified said General Plan Update FPEIR, which certification was not appealed; and RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING THE MONTGOMERY 7 PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AND RETAIL PROJECT 565 LORRAINE AVENUE ADDENDUM TO THE DIRIDON STATION AREA PLAN FINAL

More information

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa 1 INDEX THE STATEMENT OF COMPONENTS PART A THE PREAMBLE PAGE Purpose...

More information

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS

CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California (714) DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS CITY OF CYPRESS 5275 Orange Avenue Cypress, California 90630 (714) 229-6720 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PERMIT PROCESS 1. Discuss project with Planning staff to determine zoning regulations, any unusual characteristics

More information

General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat

General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat R-1 LEYDEN RIDGE LOMA RIDGE LOBDELL R-3 MILLER PARKWAY LAUSSAC Subject Property R-3 LOCHENSHIRE LESMER R General Location Courtyard at LMH Final Development Plan and Final Plat ¹ 230 115 0 230 Feet Airport

More information

EXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development

EXHIBIT A. Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS. Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development EXHIBIT A Chapter 2.7 SPECIAL PLANNED DISTRICTS Article XVIII 15th Street School Master Planned Development Sections: 2.7.3600 15 th Street School Master Planned Development 2.7.3610 Purpose 2.7.3620 Definitions

More information

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AWH REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MAY 8, 2014 The Planning and Development Department hereby forwards to the Planning

More information

KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION

KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION KEIZER STATION PLAN INTRODUCTION Planning for this area began in 1987 when the Keizer Comprehensive Plan established the Chemawa Activity Center and McNary Activity Center. The first Chemawa Activity Center

More information

APPENDIX E: CITY OF HAMILTON* STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR PARK OR OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX E: CITY OF HAMILTON* STANDARD REQUIREMENTS FOR PARK OR OPEN SPACE DEVELOPMENT * Standard Requirements by Open Space Development and Park Planning Section (OSD & PP) of Capital Planning and Implementation Division (CP&I) of Public Works. 1.1 Standard Comments at Draft Plan Approval

More information

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001

STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001 STAFF REPORT FOR STANDARD COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT #CDP 2014-0030 FEBRUARY 26, 2015 CPA - 1 OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: REQUEST: HANS HEIM PO BOX 238 APTOS, CA 94001 JAMES HAY PO BOX 762 MENDOCINO, CA 95460

More information

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards September, 2014 Eastcreek Farm Planned Development Standards September, 2014 ekfarm Contents 01. General Standards 02. Residential Development Standards 03. Architectural Design Standards 04. Landscape Design Standards

More information

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:

C-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by: C-I-10 PART C SECTION I ARTICLE 10 GENERAL REGULATIONS PROJECT SITE REVIEW I. Purpose The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: A. Protect streetscapes from projects that

More information

#8) T-1409 CENTENNIAL & LAMB TENTATIVE MAP

#8) T-1409 CENTENNIAL & LAMB TENTATIVE MAP #8) T-1409 CENTENNIAL & LAMB TENTATIVE MAP STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting Date: June 14, 2017 Item: T-1409 Prepared By: Robert Eastman GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property Owner(s): Requested

More information

Application for Site Plan Review

Application for Site Plan Review Application for Site Plan Review City of Pontiac Office of Land Use and Strategic Planning 47450 Woodward Ave, Pontiac, MI 48342 T: 248.758.2800 F: 248.758.2827 Property/Project Address: Sidwell Number:

More information

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY OF ZEELAND PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW AND SPECIAL LAND USE Date City Official App. Filing Fee Rec'd ($350) NOTE TO APPLICANT: Please submit this application for Site Plan Review along with twenty (20) copies

More information

Design Review Commission Report

Design Review Commission Report City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Design Review Commission Report Meeting Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 Subject:

More information

ORDINANCE NUMBER DRAFT. An ordinance amending Title 12 Environmental Protection of the Los Angeles County

ORDINANCE NUMBER DRAFT. An ordinance amending Title 12 Environmental Protection of the Los Angeles County ORDINANCE NUMBER DRAFT 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 An ordinance amending Title 1 Environmental Protection of the Los Angeles County Code, establishing Low Impact Development standards. The Board of Supervisors of

More information

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.1 May 18, 2016 TO: FROM: Planning Commission Department of Environmental Services SUBJECT: REVIEW OF POTENTIAL FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2016-17 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

More information

CARVER COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPE POLICY. Adopted by the Carver County Board of Commissioners March 3, 2015

CARVER COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPE POLICY. Adopted by the Carver County Board of Commissioners March 3, 2015 CARVER COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS LANDSCAPE POLICY Adopted by the Carver County Board of Commissioners March 3, 2015 Policy Statement Goals It is the goal of Carver County Public Works to provide

More information

TETON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION RESOLUTION FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS 2008 Edition. Chapter I General Provisions

TETON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION RESOLUTION FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS 2008 Edition. Chapter I General Provisions TETON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION RESOLUTION FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS 2008 Edition Chapter I General Provisions SECTION 1.1: TITLE. This Resolution shall be known as the Teton County Fire Protection Resolution

More information

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM )

Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM ) Planned Development Review Revisions (Project No. PLNPCM2014-00139) Standard residential development Planned Development Example: Smaller lot sizes than what is allowed to create open space amenity. What

More information

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria

Baumgarten MPUD. Exhibit 3 Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission s recommendation

More information

ARTICLE IX SPECIAL PERMIT USES

ARTICLE IX SPECIAL PERMIT USES ARTICLE IX SPECIAL PERMIT USES All special permit uses cited in Article IX and Attachment A of this Ordinance or any other Section of this Ordinance shall be subject to Site Plan Review. The procedures

More information

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 2010 Legislative Session. Council Members Dernoga and Olson DR- COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL 00 Legislative Session Bill No. CB--00 Chapter No. Proposed and Presented by Introduced by Co-Sponsors The Chairman

More information

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape..

The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape.. The open space system should provide connective elements, relate to natural resources, and enhance the suburban character of the landscape.. Mixed-use and infill development should maintain or enhance

More information

PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016

PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016 PRELIMINARY PLAT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Updated 4/8/2016 The following items are required for the preliminary plat. Numbers correspond with those on the example preliminary plat. RENO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No. Date: 3.10.2016 Site Plan 820160040 Nora School Parker Smith, Planning Technician, Area 1,

More information

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW

ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 6.01 - Site Plan Review (All Districts) ARTICLE VI: SITE PLAN REVIEW Site plans give the Planning commission an opportunity to review development proposals in a concise and consistent manner. The

More information

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BEACH MUNICIPAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROPERTY OWNER: SISTERS II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agriculture

More information

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1

ORDINANCE NO. City of Bellingham City Attorney 210 Lottie Street Bellingham, Washington INFILL HOUSING ORDINANCE Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LAND USE PLANNING AND ZONING, CREATING A NEW BMC CHAPTER 20.28 INFILL HOUSING, AND NEW SUBSECTION BMC 20.12.030.E, GREEN FACTOR LANDSCAPING STANDARDS, AND AMENDING

More information

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST

SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST PROJECT SUMMARY: Project Name: City/ETA Location: City ETA (Application fee & number of copies needed are based on location) Property Location (Legal Description

More information

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number:

Checklists. Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number: Applicant: Contact Name: Phone Number: Email: Project Name: Location: File Number: Date of Submittal: Reviewer: Date: Concept Plan Requirements: I. General Project Information 1. Address or parcel number

More information

Zoning Ordinance Article 3

Zoning Ordinance Article 3 Article 3 Natural Resources Protection Section 301 Natural Resources Protection 301.1. Purpose - The following natural resources protection standards are established to protect the public health, safety

More information

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION 1. This ordinance, due to its length and corresponding cost of

ORDINANCE NO. SECTION 1. This ordinance, due to its length and corresponding cost of Introduced by: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASADENA AMENDING CHAPTER 17.44 OF THE ZONING CODE (TITLE 17) TO INCORPORATE THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES MODEL WATER EFFICIENT

More information

STREAM BUFFERS

STREAM BUFFERS 88-415 STREAM BUFFERS 88-415-01 PURPOSE In the Kansas City region and throughout the nation, vegetated stream buffers have been clearly shown to protect stream stability and related infrastructure, improve

More information

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative Introduction Mitchell Ranch South is a proposed single family (detached) residential development on

More information

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA THE CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA LETTER OF DECISION Ark of Safety, Inc. Mobile, AL 36617 Re: (Northwest corner of Main Street and First Avenue, extending to the Southwest corner of Esau Avenue and Main Street.)

More information

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2017 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests a Design Review Permit Modification

More information

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO.

RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO. RD:VMT:JMD 10/14/2015 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE ADOPTING THE EDENVALE AVENUE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONING PROJECT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, FOR WHICH AN INITIAL

More information

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards July, 2015

Eastcreek Farm. Planned Development Standards July, 2015 Eastcreek Farm Planned Development Standards July, 2015 ek farm 01. General Standards 1.2 Applicability of Standards All regulations not specified in these Planned Development (PD) Standards for Eastcreek

More information

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC 14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC PROPERTY OWNER: MUNDEN & ASSOCIATES, LP STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-1 & AG-2 to Conditional O-2) ADDRESS

More information

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees*

Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees* CITY OF EAGLE 660 E. Civic Lane, Eagle, ID 83616 Phone#: (208) 939-0227 Fax: (208) 938-3854 Design Review Application *Please call prior to submittal meeting to determine applicable fees* FILE NO.: CROSS

More information

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW

ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW ARTICLE 17 SITE PLAN REVIEW 17.01 INTENT AND PURPOSE The intent of this section is to provide for consultation and cooperation between the applicant and the township planning commission so that the applicant

More information

RESOLUTION NO: WHEREAS, the subject property has a Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning designation and a General Plan designation of Institutional; and

RESOLUTION NO: WHEREAS, the subject property has a Public, Semi-Public (PS) zoning designation and a General Plan designation of Institutional; and RESOLUTION NO: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASADENA APPROVING A 14-YEAR, EIGHT-PHASE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT FOR HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL LOCATED AT 100 WEST CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD

More information

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN PREPARATION GUIDELINES

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN PREPARATION GUIDELINES LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN PREPARATION GUIDELINES The Parks Planning and Development Division of the City of Modesto s Parks, Recreation and Neighborhoods Department is responsible for the task of reviewing

More information

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MALIBU, CONSIDERING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED CRUMMER SITE SUBDIVISION FINAL EIR AND MAKING

More information

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval

Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District Form-Based Code. Staff Recommendation Approval Applicant & Property Owner Public Hearing February 8, 2017 City Council Election District Beach Agenda Item D1 Request Alternative Compliance to the prescribed criteria of the Oceanfront Resort District

More information

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Meeting Date: August 23, 2016 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item: Agenda Location: Public Hearing Work Plan # N/A Legal Review: X 1 st Reading 2 nd Reading Subject: A public hearing regarding a Conceptual

More information

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL

REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO..e REPORT TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL: DATE: March 1, 1 SUBJECT: ADOPTING RESOLUTION NOS. 1-, 1-, 1-, and 1- ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER S REPORT

More information

GENERAL LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS. The following landscape provisions shall be adhered to by all land uses unless otherwise noted:

GENERAL LANDSCAPE PROVISIONS. The following landscape provisions shall be adhered to by all land uses unless otherwise noted: CHAPTER 1.18 Sections: 1.18.005 Purpose. 1.18.010 Landscaping, Buffering, and Fencing Improvements Required. 1.18.015 General Landscape Provisions. 1.18.020 Landscaping Plan. 1.18.025 Single-Family Dwellings

More information

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan City of Cold Lake, Alberta Prepared by Durrance Projects Ltd and Ross W. Sharp & Associates Ltd October 2014 Rupert 1 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE...3 1.1. Location...4

More information

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BY: CITY COUNCIL TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR KELLY HEFFERNON, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16.84 OF THE

More information

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE SDOT SDOT Director s Rule 2-07 DPD Applicant: CITY OF SEATTLE Page 1 of 7 Supersedes: DCLU DR 11-93 SED DR 93-4 Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Department of Planning and Development (DPD)

More information

3.4 REL: Religious Use District

3.4 REL: Religious Use District 3.4 Intent - The s are established to promote and maintain the development facilities for divine worship within the Town of Plainfield. The development of religious facilities or the major expansion of

More information

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements

3.1 community vision. 3.3 required plan elements Chapter 3 Community Form 3.1 community vision 3.2 Parks & landscaping concepts 3.3 required plan elements D R A F T 20 Community Form Chapter 3 3.0 Community form 3.1 community vision The Specific Plan

More information

Palmdale Municipal Code (Excerpts) Title 14: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 14.04: JOSHUA TREE AND NATIVE DESERT VEGETATION PRESERVATION

Palmdale Municipal Code (Excerpts) Title 14: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 14.04: JOSHUA TREE AND NATIVE DESERT VEGETATION PRESERVATION Palmdale Municipal Code (Excerpts) Title 14: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Chapter 14.04: JOSHUA TREE AND NATIVE DESERT VEGETATION PRESERVATION 14.04.010 Purpose and intent. It is determined by the City Council

More information

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 10 CHAPTER 10 - WASHES SECTION 10.0 GENERAL: A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish standards for development in or near Major and Minor Washes as defined in Appendix A Glossary of Terms and Definitions

More information

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies

The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies Part 2: The West Vaughan Employment Area Secondary Plan Policies 2.1 General Policies It is the policy of Council: 2.1.1. That the West Vaughan Employment Area (the WVEA), identified on Schedule 1, will

More information

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS Chapter 10 IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS The recommended land use plan presented in the previous chapter provides a design for the attainment of the urban and rural development and open space preservation

More information

EAST ANTELOPE SPECIFIC PLAN

EAST ANTELOPE SPECIFIC PLAN Zoning Code of Sacramento County Title VI: Special Planning Areas Chapter 1 Article 1 EAST ANTELOPE SPECIFIC PLAN 601-10.1. INTENT. It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors in adopting this specific

More information

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides

More information