A. CODE AMENEMENT RELATED TO PARKS ZONING DISTRICT Request to: Amend City Code, Chapter 11 relating to Parks Zoning District

Transcription

1 AGENDA EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION Monday, July 24, :00 P.M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS: John Kirk, Charles Weber, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villarreal Julie Klima, City Planner; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE -- ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA III. MINUTES A. Approval of the Minutes for the July 10, 2017 meeting IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS V. PUBLIC MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CODE AMENEMENT RELATED TO PARKS ZONING DISTRICT Request to: Amend City Code, Chapter 11 relating to Parks Zoning District VII. PLANNERS REPORT VIII. MEMBERS REPORTS IX. CONTINUING BUSINESS X. NEW BUSINESS XI. ADJOURNMENT

2 UNAPPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, JULY 10, 2017 COMMISSION MEMBERS: CITY STAFF: 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road John Kirk, Travis Wuttke, Ann Higgins, Charles Weber, Andrew Pieper, Ed Farr, Mark Freiberg, Michael DeSanctis, Christopher Villareal Julie Klima, City Planner Rod Rue, City Engineer Matt Bourne, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources Julie Krull, Recording Secretary I. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER Chair Pieper called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Higgins and Wuttke were absent. IIII. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Weber, to approve the agenda. Motion carried 7-0. IV. MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 26, 2017 MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by DeSanctis, to approve the Planning Commission minutes dated June 26, Motion carried 7-0. V. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS VI. VII. PUBLIC MEETINGS PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ELEVATE

3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 10, 2017 Page 2 Request for: Guide Plan Change from C-Reg-Ser to TOD on 2.93 acres Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.93 acres Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 2.93 acres Zoning District Change from C-Reg-Ser to TOD-R on 2.93 acres Site Plan Review on 2.93 acres Preliminary Plat of two lots into one lot on 2.93 acres Scott Carlston, resident of 8150 Drexel Court and representing the project, presented the proposal. He stated the last time he was before the Commission was for Martin Blu project. He said his company is committed to keeping young professionals here in Eden Prairie and that is why they are here tonight for the Elevate at Southwest Station project. Mr. Carlston pointed out this is a challenging project and they have partnered with Timberland Partners to create a beautiful development in this area. Ryan Sailer, Vice President of Development for Timberland Partners, discussed the project in more detail. He stated they wanted to create a cohesive project. Mr. Carlston had assembled the parcels and they are co-developing the project. Timberland Partners is a real estate investment firm which owns and manages apartment units so they have experience in developing and managing apartment complexes such as this project. Mr. Sailer also pointed out they will be long term investors in this development. Elevate will consist of 222 apartment units, with a portion of these being affordable units. This will also be a mixed use project where there will be 2 full service restaurants and 1 to 2 retail stores on the first level. In regards to parking there will be 397 parking units; 287 will be in the garage and 110 will be surface stalls. Because it is TOD, they are supplying 175 bike parking spaces. Mr. Sailer pointed out the project will be 500 feet from the proposed LRT and next to the Southwest Station and across the street from the City park. Some of the resident amenities include a rooftop area, fitness center and a dog spa area. In regards to green design, there is 3500 square feet of green space on the roof. They will also have a rain water collection system located in the garage which will be used for irrigation. Permeable pavers will be in the parking lot and the apartment units will have energy saving appliances. Mr. Sailer said they have worked with the City, the LRT office and the Watershed District on project discussions and will continue throughout the project. In regards to scheduling of this project, Mr. Sailer said they would like to get this approved by the City Council in August and then have it approved by the Metropolitan Council in October. The target date for construction would be November Colin Kaas, architect for the project, showed how the LRT will wrap around this development and also different features for the project. He pointed out the plaza on this site along Prairie Center Drive and Technology Drive. He stated there will be a full service restaurant located in the area with outdoor seating. There will also be an outdoor nature area, trees for streetscape, and an outdoor roof area for activities.

4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 10, 2017 Page 3 They would also like a classy look on all sides of the building because it will be seen on all sides. They have spent time on lighting as they want to make it the focal point in the evenings. Freiberg said he is familiar with the lot and said he knows the design of this project was not an easy task for this area. He asked the project proponent if any retailers have expressed interest in the development. Mr. Sailer said he has not had any retailers express interest but is not concerned that the space will get filled. Freiberg commented it was good to see the developer is setting aside 20% for affordable units. DeSanctis asked what preventative measures are being taken to address soil conditions on the site. Mr. Sailer said there will be supportive units put into place as they are aware of the soil conditions. Chair Pieper asked Klima to review the staff report. Klima said this proposed project would include the development of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) project that would integrate both residential and commercial development. The City views this project as the opportunity site for redevelopment as there were previous talks the SWLRT project office about the preferred location for the parking ramp expansion to allow for development potential. The project also provides an opportunity to move pedestrians through this site and to transit services. Klima pointed out in regards to the TOD development, they are requesting to re-guide the property to TOD. In August of 2016, the City adopted the TOD Zoning District regulations. As a part of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide the property to TOD, a text amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is necessary to establish the dialogue supporting the TOD land use designation. There is a proposed comprehensive plan language in the staff report to address TOD development generally and then specifically for the Southwest Station area. It is anticipated with the Aspire Eden Prairie 2040 effort that additional language will be drafted related to the other TOD areas throughout the community. Klima utilized the overhead projector to show where the plaza area would be located to draw pedestrians into the site and into the retail area, which in turn would move them into the parking ramp. As part of this development, it will incorporate benches, public art, decorative bike racks and decorative surface to enhance the plaza and area. All of these things will create a welcoming feel. The retail promenade will also move people through the site. The developer is requesting PUD approval with 6 waivers. Staff recommendation is for approval. In regards to park dedication, the City is working with the project proponent. Kirk stated this project is intriguing because the area has historically had traffic flow problems and asked what has been discussed on this issue. Klima said the City staff is aware of the traffic issues, specifically during the noon hour. The

5 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 10, 2017 Page 4 development is also aware and is working to attract users that will compliment rather than duplicate existing uses on site. In addition, after 6 pm the parking garage would be open for public use. Kirk asked if the City is comfortable with the parking plan. Klima stated staff is comfortable with the plan. Villareal asked if the pick-up station for Southwest Transit is to be expanded. Klima showed where the drop-off areas would be for the LRT and Southwest Station. Rue stated on this site there will be LRT improvements. There is a bus and an LRT platform. The entrance off of Technology Drive would be full access with left hand turns, but there would not be a signal at that intersection. Weber stated that could potentially be a problem. Rue said there will be some reduction in traffic there as Culver s will be gone. Weber said it is difficult to drive east and west in the parking lot. Rue said there were some recommendations to this area to alleviate some traffic issues. There will also be two access points to get out of the parking ramp versus just the one which is there now. Farr asked if this project is contingent on the LRT coming into the area. Klima said since the site is already served by a bus station, it qualifies as a TOD area. Villareal asked if there will be plans for electrical vehicle charging stations. Mr. Sailer said they have not put that into the plan yet. Villareal asked how many garbage stalls would there be and will the retailers have access to them. Mr. Sailer said there will be 3 garbage containers and 2 recycling containers and the retailers will have access to these. Farr asked in regards to delivery vehicles and moving vans how will this work. Mr. Sailer said they will have the ability to stage the timing on this. Chair Pieper opened the meeting up for public input. Jeff Strate, resident of Summer Hill Drive and member of the Southwest Light Rail Transit Advisory Committee, stated he applauds the project and would like to see it get approved. Farr said in regards to parking, there may be a demand for reserve parking signs and he would like this thought out prior to construction versus being an afterthought. In regards to service parking, perhaps they could be color coded to show what retail areas they may belong to. Farr stated the project proponent did a great job on façade design but he would like a main identifier for the entrance to the apartment unit. He also asked, in regards to the parking ramp, that previously has been a focal point and now it will be hidden by this project; has there been a concern regarding signage by the Southwest Station. Klima said signage for the transit services will be addressed with the SWLRT project. Farr said overall, this is a great project. Kirk concurred with Farr and commented the project blends in with the City s

6 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 10, 2017 Page 5 vision. Freiberg concurred and said it was a great project for the City. Klima stated if this project moves forward this evening she recommends language addressing park dedication payments be added to the motion. Villareal commented he would like to see electrical vehicle chargers set up on this project. Farr said he would like to build on that concern because there will be a demand for these in the future. Mr. Carlston said in Martin Blu they did put in two stalls and currently they are not being used. Chair Pieper stated he is in favor of this project. MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Villareal, to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION: Kirk moved, seconded by Weber, to recommend approval of the Guide Plan Change from C-Reg-Ser to TOD on 2.93 acres; Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.93 acres; Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 2.93 acres; Zoning District Change from C-Reg-Ser to TOD-R on 2.93 acres; Site Plan Review on 2.93 acres and Preliminary Plat on two lots into one lot on 2.93 acres; TOD Comp Plan language; and finalization of park dedication fee based on final, PUD and TIF agreements, based on plans stamp dated June 30, 2017 and the information included in the staff report dated July 6, Motion carried 7-0. VIII. PLANNERS REPORT IX. MEMBERS REPORT X. CONTINUING BUSINESS XI. NEW BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Weber moved, seconded by Freiberg, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. Motion carried 7-0. Chair Pieper adjourned the meeting at 8:35 p.m.

7 STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: Planning Commission Beth Novak-Krebs, Senior Planner DATE: July 19, 2017 SUBJECT: Code Amendment Park Zoning District BACKGROUND The Comprehensive Guide Plan adopted in 2009 includes a land use category for Parks/Open Space. There are a number of properties identified as Parks/Open Space on the Guide Plan Map. State law requires zoning to conform to the guide plan. One of the implementation strategies outlined in the Comprehensive Guide Plan is to amend the zoning map and ordinance to reflect the policies in the plan. The properties that are designated as Park/Open Space in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan are zoned a variety of different zoning districts including Rural, Public, R1-13.5, R1-9.5, RM-6.5, RM-2.5, I- Gen, Office, and Commercial. For the past several months, staff has been preparing draft language to create a new Park Zoning District and associated regulations. The intent of the Park Zoning District is to ultimately apply these draft zoning regulations to City-owned parks and open space in order to bring the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning for these sites into compliance. The draft ordinance creates a Park Zoning District and regulations that establish permitted uses, setbacks, parking lot design standards, architectural standards and other standards for properties zoned to Park. Following is a summary of the standards: The permitted uses proposed in the district include a number of government owned and operated sites providing recreation such as parks, playgrounds, community centers, or other similar uses. The City s historical buildings, the public environmental education center, public conservation areas and recreation related structures and amenities that support the primary use of the site are also included. The building setbacks are proposed at 35 front, 25 side and 50 rear. The parking lot standards are applicable to parking lots that are new or enlarged after the adoption of the ordinance to minimize nonconformities. The parking lot setbacks are 20 front, 10 side, and 50 rear. The fencing standards will bring the existing tall fencing around athletic fields, ball diamonds, courts and similar uses into conformance and allow similar fencing that is new to exceed the existing 7 maximum height standard. All other fencing in the proposed Park District is required to meet the maximum 7 height standard consistent with City Code and Building Code.

8 Staff Report Park Zoning District July 19, 2017 Landscaping standards apply to landscaping that is required after the adoption of the ordinance to minimize creation of nonconformities. The standards require mechanical equipment screening, general screening, and using a combination of trees, shrubs, perennials, and ornamental grasses to create a diverse and well balanced design. The lighting standards bring the existing athletic field lighting fixtures into conformance and allow similar new lighting to be a maximum of 100 tall. All new lighting fixtures installed after the adoption of the ordinance will have to meet the standards as proposed in the ordinance. As proposed, the architectural standards apply to all new buildings that require a building permit and are visible from the right-of-way and/or a differing land use. The intent is that the existing Design Guidelines be used as the standard for the architectural design of the building. The buildings should be compatible with the built environment surrounding the park, fit the context of the site and further the intent and goals of the Design Guidelines including the development of high quality projects balanced with aesthetics, function, surrounding environment and economics. There are a number of minor amendments to other sections of Chapter 11 that are being proposed. These amendments are necessary to provide reference and consistency between the Park District language and other parts of the Chapter. The standards as proposed will create only a few nonconformities. In order to eliminate those nonconformities, the City anticipates requesting variances for those specific situations when the property is rezoned to the Park District. A similar approach was used when schools were rezoned to the Public District. This draft language has been reviewed by the Parks, Recreation, and Natural Resources Commission. The Commission expressed its support for the draft ordinance. It has also been reviewed by the Community Development Director, the Parks and Recreation Director, and the Parks and Natural Resources Manager and City Attorney. Provided the Park District language is adopted, the next step is to begin rezoning properties to Park. The adoption of these amendments does not impact specific properties until such time as they are rezoned. The rezoning of properties will require a public process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance adding the Park Zoning District and associated amendments of other sections of Chapter 11 related to the Park Zoning District. 2

9 Draft July 19, 2017 SECTION 11.XX. P- PARK DISTRICT. Subd. 1. Purpose. The Park District is established to (1) promote, preserve, and protect publically owned parks and open space through conservation and appropriate and compatible development; (2) provide opportunities for active and passive indoor and outdoor recreation and leisure activities integral to the overall quality of life; (3) protect natural resources including grassland, forest, wetlands and other features; (4) enhance property values and further the purposes of the City s Park and Open Space System Plan. Subd. 2. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the following meanings stated: Historical Property: A Historic Preservation Site as designated in this Chapter and/or a district, site, building, structure or object on the National Register of Historic Places. Lot Line, perimeter: The boundary that encompasses the entire park property which may include multiple parcels that function as a single site. Front yard, perimeter: The area between the perimeter front lot line and the required front setback extending across that portion of a park property adjacent to the exterior streets. Park Property: A single parcel or multiple parcels that function as a single site. When a street crosses a park property, the park property is still considered a single site. Public Recreation: Any use commonly provided for and open to the public at parks, playgrounds, community centers, or other similar sites owned or operated by a unit of government for the purpose of providing recreation. Rear yard, perimeter: The area lying between the perimeter rear lot line and the required rear setback line extending from the perimeter side lot lines. Side yard, perimeter: The area between the perimeter side lot line and the required side setback extending from the perimeter front lot line to the perimeter rear lot line. Subd. 3. Permitted Uses. A. Public Recreation B. Publicly Owned Historical Property/Building C. Recreation related structures and amenities that support the primary use of the site D. Public Conservation Areas 1

10 E. Public Infrastructure F. Antennas and Towers, in those locations and subject to the limitations contained in City Code Section Subd. 4. Lots and Accessory Structures and Uses A. Lots/Parcels. Park property may consist of one or more lots or parcels that for the purposes of this Section function as one site. Setbacks for parking lots, buildings, and accessory structures and use shall be measured from the perimeter lot line that encompasses the park property. B. Accessory Structures and Uses. Accessory structures and uses in the Park District may be located on the same lot as the principal use or structure or on another lot within the park property. An accessory structure or use may occur without a primary structure and may be allowed in the perimeter front yard setback up to 15 feet from the property line. Subd. 5. Parking Lot Design: The following parking lot screening and parking setbacks shall be applicable to new or enlarged parking areas after the effective date of the adoption of this Section: A. Parking Lot Location. Off-street parking facilities shall be on the same parcel or parcels of land that contain the structure or use that the parking is intended to serve. B. Parking Setbacks. Parking areas shall be at least 20 feet from any front lot line, 10 feet from any side lot line and 50 feet from any rear lot line and shall be at least 5 feet from a building. C. Parking Lot Screening. Off-street parking areas shall be screened from adjacent differing land uses and the public right of way as required in Section D. Parking Surface: All parking lots shall be surfaced in accordance with Section E. Parking Lot Islands: Parking lot islands shall be included at the ends of parking aisles rows and shall include planting material. Each island shall be a minimum of 160 square feet and no dimension shall be less than 5 feet. F. Shared Use Parking: Shared use parking is allowed between a park and an adjacent public district when it can be demonstrated to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Planner that the uses have different peak hour parking demands. If shared parking is allowed the parties shall enter into a shared parking agreement in form and substance as approved by the City Planner. Overflow parking is allowed between two park properties. 2

11 Subd. 6 Building Setbacks Building setbacks shall be measured from the perimeter lot line. Subd. 7 Fencing Fencing associated with athletic fields, ball diamonds, courts and similar uses may exceed 7 feet in height. Fencing not associated with athletic fields, diamonds, courts or similar use shall be limited to 7 feet in height and may occupy any perimeter yard. No fence, hedge or other planting exceeding 30" in height or trees pruned even to a height less than 8 feet shall be permitted where there will be interference with traffic sight distance. Subd. 8. Landscaping Landscaping required after the effective date of the adoption of this Section shall comply with the following: A. Mechanical equipment screened in accordance with this Chapter. B. General screening in this Chapter. C. Native plant material is encouraged consistent with this Chapter. D. Landscaping shall include a combination of trees, shrubs, perennials, and ornamental grasses to create a diverse and balanced design. Subd. 9. Architectural Standards. All new buildings, including storage and equipment buildings, in the Park District that require a building permit, are visible from the public right-of-way, street, and/or an adjacent differing land use and constructed after the effective date of this ordinance (date) shall comply with the following: The City s Design Guidelines shall be used as the standards for the architectural design of the buildings in the Park District. The architectural design should be compatible with the built environment surrounding the park, fit the context of the site and further the intent and goals of the Design Guidelines including the development of high quality projects balanced with aesthetics, function, surrounding environment, and economics,. Subd. 10. Lighting Standards. Athletic Field Lighting Fixtures: Light poles (not including base) shall be a maximum height of 100 feet with downcast and cut off lens. Lighting shall be directed toward the athletic field. All new lighting fixtures and poles installed in the Park District after the effective date of the adoption of this Section shall comply with the following: 3

12 A. Lighting shall not exceed a maximum of 0.5 foot candles as measured at the perimeter property line demonstrated with a photometric plan. B. Glare, whether direct or reflected, such as from spotlights or high temperature processes, and as differentiated from general illumination, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the immediate site from which it originates. C. Parking Lot Lighting Fixtures: Light poles shall be a maximum height of 25 feet as measured from grade with downcast and cut off lens. Full cutoff lighting fixtures shall be used in order to minimize ambient light pollution and side glare. Parking lot lighting fixtures in the interior portions of the parking lot are not required to be located in islands. 4

13 PROPOSED CHANGES TO EXISTING CODE SECTIONS: SECTION ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT, SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. Subd. 1. Establishment of Districts. A. The following Districts, with the abbreviations stated, are hereby established. (Some Districts are subdivided for the purpose of this Chapter, in which case, only the abbreviations of such subdivisions may be shown.) DISTRICT TITLE ABBREVIATION Rural District R One-Family Residential District R-1 R1-44 R1-22 R R1-9.5 Multi-Family Residential District RM RM-6.5 RM-2.5 Office District OFC Commercial District C Neighborhood Commercial District N-Com Community Commercial District C-Com Regional Commercial District C-Reg Regional Service District C-Reg-Ser Highway Commercial District C-Hwy Town Center District TC Mixed Use TC Residential TC - Commercial Transit Oriented Development District TOD Mixed Use TOD Residential TOD - Employment Industrial District Industrial Park District Industrial Park District General Industrial District Public District Golf Course Airport Office Airport Commercial Park District - - TC TC-MU TC-R TC-C TOD TOD-MU TOD-R TOD-E I I-2 I-5 I-Gen PUB GC A - OFC A C P 5

14 OFFICE/ COMMERCIA L/ INDUSTRIAL/ DIST. MINIMUM LOT SIZE Area S.F. of Acres Widt h Ft. Dept h Ft. MINIMU M LOT WIDTH AT RIGHT OF WAY LINE MINIMUM YARD-SETBACK Front Ft. One Side Ft. Both Sides Ft. Rear Ft. SITE AREA PER DWELLING UNIT SQ. FT. OR ACRES MAX. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) MAXIMU M BASE AREA RATIO (BAR)* HEIGHT OF MAIN STRUCTU RE (FT.) C-REG 50 ACRE S N/A N/A N/A Dwelling Not Permitted Story 0.5- Multi Story I-2 PARK 2 acres Dwelling Not Permitted I-5 PARK 5 acres Dwelling Not Permitted I-GEN 5 acres Dwelling Not Permitted Story 0.5- Multi Story Story 0.5- Multi Story Story 0.5- Multi Story PUB N/A N/A N/A N/A Dwelling Not Permitted N/A N/A 30 P-PARK *perimeter setback N/A N/A N/A N/A 35* 25* 50* 50* Dwelling Not Permitted except for existing Historic Sites N/A N/A 30 6

15 OFFICE/ COMMERCIA L/ INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Maximu m Height Min. Dist. to Side Lot Line Min. Dist. to Rear Lot Line OFF-STREET LOADING SCREENING AND LANDSCAPI NG MIN. ZONE AREA (ACRES) MAX. ZONE AREA (ACRES) FLOOR AREA PRIMARY USE (SQ. FT.) MAX. TOTAL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) OFC YES YES N/A N/A N/A N/A N-COM YES YES ,000 50,000 C-COM YES YES , ,000 C-HWY YES YES , ,000 C-REG-SER YES YES 10 N/A N/A N/A C-REG YES YES 60 N/A N/A N/A I-2 PARK YES YES 40 N/A N/A N/A I-5 PARK YES YES 40 N/A N/A N/A I-GEN YES YES 80 N/A N/A N/A PUB YES YES N/A N/A N/A N/A GC YES YES N/A N/A N/A N/A A-C YES YES NA NA NA NA A-OFC YES YES N/A N/A N/A N/A P-PARK YES YES N/A N/A N/A N/A 7

16 Subd. 3. Special Requirements. The following special requirements shall apply to all Districts: A. Lots in all Districts except the RM and Park Districts shall be required to have frontage on a public street. Corner lots shall have additional width equal to the minimum interior side yard requirement and shall in no case be less than 90 feet. E. Fences not over 7 feet in height may occupy any yard. No fence, hedge or other planting exceeding 30" in height or trees pruned even to a height less than 8 feet shall be permitted where there will be interference with traffic sight distance. Fencing in the Park District is exempt from these requirements. Fencing standards for the Park District are set forth in Section 11.xxx. H. 5. (b) Minimum Distance and Setback. Parking areas for 5 vehicles or more shall be at least 10 feet from any side or rear lot line and 5 feet from any building. Minimum Distance and Setbacks in the Park District are exempt from these requirements. Parking lot setback standards for the Park District are set forth in Section 11.xx. K. Architectural Standards. All structures within all districts, except Rural, R1-44, R1-22, R1-13.5, R1-9.5, RM-6.5, GC, and Park, shall be developed in accordance with the following design standards: Subd. 4 Performance Standards. E. Glare. Glare, whether direct or reflected, such as from spotlights or high temperature processes, and as differentiated from general illumination, shall not be visible beyond the limits of the immediate site from which it originates. Lighting illumination shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles measured at the property line. Pole lighting height shall not exceed 25 feet measured at natural grade. Pole lighting in the interior portion of a parking lot shall be located within a parking island. Site lighting for, public facilities is exempt. Glare and Lighting illumination in the Park District are exempted from these requirements. Glare and Lighting illumination standards for the Park District are set forth in Section 11.xx. Subd. 6. Site Plan and Architectural Design Review. F. The Site Plan and Architectural Design, for properties other than those in the Park District, may not be acted upon by the Council until it has received the recommendation of the Planning Commission or until sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date it has been referred to the Planning Commission for its study and report. Site Plans for City owned park property may not be acted upon by the Council until it has received the recommendation of the Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission or until sixty (60) days have elapsed from the date it have been referred to the Parks, Recreation 8

17 and Natural Resources Commission for its study and report. No approval shall be given until a public hearing has been held thereon by the Council. A notice of the time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing. A notice shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within five hundred (500) feet of the property to which the requested approval relates. For the purpose of giving mailed notice, any appropriate records to determine the names and addresses of owners may be used. A copy of the notice and list of the owners and addresses to which the notice was sent shall be attested to by the person giving the notice and shall be made a part of the records of the proceeding. The failure to give mailed notice to the property owners or defects in the notice shall not invalidate the proceeding provided a bonafide attempt to comply with this provision has been made. Approval of the Council shall require a two-thirds vote of all the members of the Council. 9

18 PROJECT PROFILE JULY 24, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 24, CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO PARKS ZONING DISTRICT (BETH) Public Hearing amending City Code, Chapter 11, to amend Parks Zoning District Contact: Beth Novak-Krebs, Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 05/12/17 Notice to Paper Date 07/06/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Date Complete N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Meeting Date 07/24/17 1 st Meeting Date 00/00/17 Initial DRC review N/A 2 nd Meeting Date CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 8, ELEVATE ( ) by Timberland Partners. (JULIE) Proposal for a 6 story, 222 unit apartment building with mixed use on first floor on 2.93 acres Location: Technology Dr. Contact: Bob Fransen Request for: Guide Plan Change from C-Reg-Ser to TOD on 2.93 acres Planned Unit Development Concept Review on 2.93 acres Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on 2.93 acres Zoning District Change from C-Reg-Ser to TOD-R on 2.93 acres Site Plan Review on 2.93 acres Preliminary Plat of two lots into one lot on 2.93 acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 04/07/17 Notice to Paper Date 06/22/17 Notice to Paper Date 07/20/17 Date Complete 06/14/17 Resident Notice Date 06/23/17 Resident Notice Date 07/21/ Day Deadline 10/12/17 Meeting Date 07/10/17 1 st Meeting Date 08/08/17 Initial DRC review 04/13/17 2 nd Meeting Date 00/00/17 1

19 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AUGUST 8, CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO COMMUNITY CENTERS (STEVE) Public Hearing amending City Code, Chapter 11, to address Community Centers Contact: Steve Durham, Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 04/14/17 Notice to Paper Date 05/04/17 Notice to Paper Date 05/24/17 Date Complete N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Meeting Date 05/22/17 1 st Meeting Date 06/13/17 Initial DRC review N/A 2 nd Meeting Date 08/08/17 2. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO DAYCARE (STEVE) Public Hearing amending City Code, Chapter 11, to address daycares Contact: Steve Durham, Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 04/14/17 Notice to Paper Date 06/08/17 Notice to Paper Date 06/22/17 Date Complete N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Meeting Date 06/26/17 1 st Meeting Date 07/11/17 Initial DRC review N/A 2 nd Meeting Date 08/08/17 CONSERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 8, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 14, 2017 HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 21, MEETING TIME/LOCATION CHANGE GLEN LAKE CHILDREN S CAMP PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 28, 2017 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT SEPTEMBER 5, WHITETAIL BLUFF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (BETH) Amendment to Development Agreement 2

20 IN BUT NOT SCHEDULED 1. EDEN BLUFF 4 TH ADDITION ( ) by Pope Architects. (BETH) Proposal is a two phase approach: Phase 1 to construct surface parking of 252 spaces on 11.67acres; Phase 2 will include a new 3 story, 120,000 square foot office building with additional 530 parking spaces. Location: Charlson Rd & Liatris Ln. Contact: Paul Holmes Request for: Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on acres Site Plan Review on acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 06/26/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Date Complete 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/ Day Deadline 00/00/17 Meeting Date 00/00/17 1 st Meeting Date 00/00/17 Initial DRC review 06/29/17 2 nd Meeting Date 00/00/17 2. EDEN PRAIRIE ASSEMBLY OF GOD ( ) by Station 19 Architects. (ANGIE) Proposal for a 12,423 sq ft one and two story addition and a 4,270 sq ft remodel of the main and lower level on acres Location: Duck Lake Trail. Contact: Dan Torgerson Request for: Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on acres Site Plan Review on acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 07/07/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Date Complete 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/17 Resident Notice Date 00/00/ Day Deadline 00/00/17 Meeting Date 00/00/17 1 st Meeting Date 00/00/17 Initial DRC review 07/13/17 2 nd Meeting Date 00/00/17 3. CODE AMENDMENT RELATED TO SELF STORAGE FACILITIES (STEVE) Public Hearing amending City Code, Chapter 11, to self-storage facilities Contact: Steve Durham, Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 07/14/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Notice to Paper Date 00/00/17 Date Complete N/A Resident Notice Date N/A Resident Notice Date N/A 120 Day Deadline N/A Meeting Date 00/ st Meeting Date 00/00/17 Initial DRC review N/A 2 nd Meeting Date 00/00/17 3

21 4. SOUTHWEST STATION PUD AMENDMENT ( ) by SW Metro Transit Commission (JULIE) Proposal for additional parking structure at southwest station Contact: Julie Klima, Request for: Planned Unit Development District Review with waivers on acres Zoning District Amendment within the Commercial Regional Service Zoning District on acres Site Plan Review on acres Application Info Planning Commission City Council Date Submitted 00/00/15 Notice to Paper Date 11/19/15 Notice to Paper Date 12/17/15 Date Complete 00/00/15 Resident Notice Date 11/20/15 Resident Notice Date 12/18/ Day Deadline 00/00/15 Meeting Date 12/07/15 1 st Meeting Date 01/05/16 Initial DRC review 00/00/15 2 nd Meeting Date APPROVED VARIANCES TELECOMMUNICATION PROJECTS 4