TTC Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility for New Streetcars and Leslie St. Connecting Track Transit Project Assessment Process

Transcription

1 TTC Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility for New Streetcars and Leslie St. Connecting Track Transit Project Assessment Process Public Meeting Summary Report July 28, 2010 Prepared by Lura Consulting August 2010

2 This summary report was prepared by Lura Consulting. It captures the key comments raised during the July 28, 2010 Meeting. It is not intended to be a verbatim transcript. If you have any questions or comments regarding the summary, please contact: Lito Romano Community Liasion Officer Strategic Partnerships, Transit City Toronto Transit Commission lito.romano@ttc.ca Jim Faught Lura Consulting x 5 jfaught@lura.ca TORONTO t: f: Consumers Road - Suite 201 Toronto, Ontario M2J 4Z2, Canada HAMILTON t: f: Hunter Street East - Suite 601 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3W8, HALIFAX t: f: Hammonds Plains Rd Unit 14, Suite 350

3 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND JULY 28 PUBLIC MEETING PUBLIC NOTIFICATION TTC MAILINGS / NOTIFICATIONS FIRST NATIONS COMMENTS RECEIVED FROM THE PUBLIC MEETING HOW CAN THE TTC BEST INVOLVE THE COMMUNITY GOING FORWARD (E.G., TYPES OF CONSULTATION, OUTREACH)? DO YOU HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS ON MINIMIZING COMMUNITY DISRUPTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE FACILITY? DO YOU HAVE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS ON MINIMIZING COMMUNITY DISRUPTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE LESLIE STREET CONNECTION TRACK? DO YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PROJECT (E.G., SOIL REMOVAL, NOISE, PEDESTRIAN/CYCLIST IMPROVEMENTS, ETC.)? COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS RECEIVED VIA Noise and Vibration Other QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS SOIL CONTAMINATION NOISE AND VIBRATION LANDSCAPE DESIGN PUBLIC CONSULTATION CONCERNS SITE LOCATION ASHBRIDGES BAY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CONNAUGHT / RUSSELL YARD CONSTRUCTION STREETCARS VERSUS BUSES ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS TRAFFIC OTHER APPENDIX A JULY 28, 2010 PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY APPENDIX B PUBLIC MEETING NOTIFICATION Summary Report August 2010 i

4 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING (This page intentionally left blank.) ii Summary Report August 2010

5 1 Introduction 1.1 Background New maintenance and storage facilities must be added to Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operations to accommodate new streetcars and enhance transit service for the community. One of those facilities to support existing streetcar routes will be in the City s southeast end so streetcars can access it from the Queen Street East streetcar tracks. In December 2009, Toronto City Council approved a settlement with the Toronto Port Authority to transfer ownership of the selected Ashbridges property to the City for TTC use and the TTC Commission approved the use of this property for their streetcar maintenance and storage facility. One hundred new, accessible streetcars will be stored at the Ashbridges Bay Fleet Maintenance and Storage Facility to be built at the southeast corner of Lake Shore Boulevard and Leslie Street. On June 9, 2010, Toronto City Council approved the Ashbridges Bay site and connection tracks on Leslie Street. The Ashbridges facility is to be completed in 2013 in time for the delivery of the first 36 streetcars. The new storage facilities will be built to Toronto Green Development Standards, and staff will follow best practices to ensure the site is energy efficient and environmentally friendly. Notice of Commencement of the Transit Project Assessment Process for the Ashbridges Bay Fleet Mainteance and Storage Faciltiy was issued on June 24, July 28 Public Meeting The TTC hosted a public meeting on July 28, 2010 at the Toronto Fire and EMS Training Centre (895 Eastern Avenue, Toronto) to discuss all aspects of the Transit Project Assessment Process. A summary of the meeting is provided in Appendix A. Summary Report August

6 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET 2 Public Notification CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING The following section lists the methods used to notify stakeholders about the Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility Notice of Commencement of the Transit Project Assessment Process and subsequent public meeting held on July 28, Copies of notifications are provided in Appendix B. 2.1 TTC Mailings / Notifications The Notice of Commencement of the Transit Project Asssessment was published in the Beaches Mirror on June 24 and July 8, It was also published in The Metro on June 24, On June 22, 2010, notices were mailed to all property owners within 40 metres of the site and connecting tracks on Leslie Street. On June 22, 2010, an additional 18,379 notices were delivered within the area of Kingston Road and Gerrard Street to the north, Lee Avenue to the east, Logan Avenue to the west, and south to the lake. On June 22, 2010, notices were mailed and ed to all who had expressed interest in the project to date (848). Additional public meeting notices were delivered first class mail on July 14, 2010, to everyone within 40 m of the project as well as to all those who expressed interest in the project to date (848). Agencies were sent notices of Commencement on June 22, 2010, and additional notices of the Public Meeting on July 14, First Nations A letter was sent to the Director of the MOE regarding First Nations consultation for the project on June 23, Notification was sent to: INAC Specific Claims, LMRB, and Comprehensive Claims, and the Ontario Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs. Notice of Commencment of the Transit Project Assessment Process for the project was given to the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation, all of the Williams Treaty First Nations, the Huron-Wendat First Nation, the Kawartha Nishnawbe First Nation, and the Métis Nation of Ontario. First Nation contact information was confirmed by the Ministry of Aboriginal Affairs and the MOE. Each First Nation was specifically asked to advise of any interest they may have in the project so that TTC could follow-up directly. 2 Summary Report August 2010

7 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING 3 Comments Received from the Public Meeting A summary of all comments received is presented below. The comments are grouped by the questions asked on the worksheet provided at the meeting, followed by comments and questions received via between July 28 and August 6, 2010, which are sorted by category. 3.1 How can the TTC best involve the community going forward (e.g., types of consultation, outreach)? TTC representatives should use more visuals when answering questions. Facilitation at public meetings should be improved. The TTC s Community Liaison Officer must make sure the needs of the community are addressed. A definitive list of impacts to residents should be created, since it seems like homeowners are currently being left out. (Note: TTC indicated that meetings specific to homeowners concerns on Leslie Street were held on July 14 and 15, Minutes of these meetings are posted on the project website at Mitigation and communication are essential. The TTC should train their presenters to be better speakers. 3.2 Do you have any recommendations on minimizing community disruptions during construction of the Facility? The community should be engaged through community events hosted by the TTC. Make it fun! (Note: TTC held outdoor tent events with representatives from each of the design teams for the landscape design competition on August 8 and 10, 2010.) The TTC should offer free TTC tickets and tokens to families in the area. Communication with the community regarding air quality issues during soil removal is essential. (Note: a presentation to the South Riverdale Community Health Centre regarding soil removal, including air quality testing, was posted on the project website on August 13, 2010.) Use the quietest machinery available from anywhere in the world, even if it costs more. 3.3 Do you have any recommendations on minimizing community disruptions during construction of the Leslie Street connection track? Host a street festival. Put up funky, creative signs updating people on your progress and the number of days left in project. Adequate notice of any disruptions to parking or driveway access off Leslie Street should be given to residents. Summary Report August

8 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Make parking available on both sides of Mosley and give Leslie Street residents that live between Eastern and Mosley free street parking. Keep the sidewalks clear for pedestrians. 3.4 Do you have additional comments/recommendations on the project (e.g., soil removal, noise, pedestrian/cyclist improvements, etc.)? Show the community you care about it. Be open and transparent. Recruit street captains to represent their streets and provide the TTC feedback and suggestions. Practice proactive monitoring over the long-term so residents don't need to harass the TTC. Use marketing smarts and make Leslie Street an attractive and vibrant entrance to the waterfront and Tommy Thompson Park. Some example ideas include: innovative and delightful signs pointing the way to the waterfront, distinctive street lights, large hanging baskets, an arch at Queen and Leslie with bird motifs, and unique street signs. Eccentric individuals should not be given a platform at the information meetings. The Russell Yard should be decommissioned. Connaught Avenue residents should be brought into the conversation as soon as possible. 3.5 Comments and Questions Received Via Noise and Vibration Noise and vibration mitigation from the construction and operation of the connection track on Leslie Street is a primary concern to film operations on Eastern Avenue. A request was made for the slide from the meeting s presentation that detailed the exact decibel levels of existing TTC equipment. A request was made for the maximum noise and vibration levels allowed on the new equipment and track Other A request was made for information regarding the method of procurement for the project. Informational sessions about the Design Competition should not be held in the same week in the middle of the summer. (Note: TTC indicated they would prefer to hold public meetings in September, but that would delay all projects. All information for the design competition is posted online and available for comment until August 23, 2010.) Questions: Will mitigation measures for Connaught Avenue residents be on the meeting s agenda? (Note: TTC indicated Transit Project Assessments are held for new Transit infrastructure. As a result, mitigation measures currently pertain only to the 4 Summary Report August 2010

9 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility and the connection track on Leslie Street. However, as soon as details are confirmed regarding any construction on Connaught and at the Russell Facility, residents will be notified and consulted.) If Bombardier does not meet the maximum and noise and vibration levels for the new streetcars, what is the recourse? (Note: TTC indicated that for the new, custom-designed light rail vehicles (LRVs), all measures are being taken to ensure more rigourous noise and vibration specifications than for the off-the-shelf Bombardier LRVs. Specific mitigation measures will be implemented where required based on Ministry of Environment noise and vibration guidelines.) 4 Questions and Answers The following is a summary of the questions, answers, and comments that arose during the meeting. They are categorized by topic. Questions are indicated with a Q, answers with an A, and Comments with a C, and do not necessarily appear in the order they were asked or stated. Answers were provided by the members from the Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility project team. Answers provided by the project after the public meeting are shown as notes in italics. 4.1 Soil Contamination Q: Are dust control measures taking into account the fact that the soil being removed is contaminated? A: Yes. There will be ongoing monitoring of the soil removal process, which will include dust control and air quality monitoring. Soil data, including all contaminants at the Ashbridges site, will be publicized on the project website for the the community. (Note: A specific soil summary presentation was requested by the South Riverdale Community Health Centre and was posted on the project website.) Q: How much soil is being removed, and what material will be used to cap the remaining soil after the removal process is complete? A: We are removing soil to approximately grade-level. Remaining soil will be capped, followed by concrete encasement for the tracks. The capping depth will be approximately 1.5 metres, which exceeds the standard capping guideline requirement of 0.5 metres. Q: Is it correct to assume that no shovels will be in the ground until the risk assessment on soil contamination is complete? A: Soil removal will not begin until submission and approval of an Environmental Project Report. The Environmental Project Report will contain information from Summary Report August

10 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment about subsurface investigation of the soil and groundwater below the mound as well as a waste characterization study that has been completed to assess the quality of the soil in the mound. The tender for soil removal does not yet exist. Soil removal will not begin for approximately another 4 or 5 months. Q: Will there be threshold in the risk assessment for contaminated soil removal that, if surpassed, will force the facility to be located elsewhere? A: Preliminary data show that the contamination is well within the risk margins. We will post soil contamination data publicly and use industry standards for strict dust control and air quality monitoring during construction. A significant investment is being made. C: When the eastern section of the Gardiner Expressway was removed, it was known that the removal of contaminated soil was necessary. A monitoring committee was set up in July The committee has been meeting with City staff ever since, even though they often drag their feet. To the TTC s credit, the committee will be meeting with the TTC in the next few weeks. The committee has been trying to get signage on the northwest corner of Lake Shore Boulevard and Leslie Street to tell people about the contamination. (Note: Members of this Committee invited TTC to meet at the South Riverdale Community Health Centre on August 11, 2010 and the presentation is posted on the project website.) 4.2 Noise and Vibration Q: You have stated that no prototype light rail vehicle (LRV) yet exists, so are we to assume that you will be testing the first one in our neighbourhood? A: Although a prototype does not yet exist, Bombardier has built many FLEXITY vehicles that are currently operating in Europe. We gathered preliminary data from these vehicles since the LRVs that TTC will use are similar to the FLEXITY vehicles. The specifications for the LRVs ordered by the TTC are such that they should be even quieter than current FLEXITY vehicles due to more rigorous specifications for noise and vibration. Q: You have stated that the LRVs should be quieter, but what are the maximum noise and vibration levels that the TTC will allow? A: The TTC has preliminary noise and vibration data gathered from current streetcars and also from Bombardier FLEXITY vehicles operating in Europe and Vancouver, which will be similar to those operating in Toronto. The new LRVs have four levels of suspension, will be operating on rubber-mounted tracks, and are fitted with rubber-mounted axels. Essentially, they are going to be as quiet as a rail vehicle can possibly be. The specifications in the contract with Bombardier ensure that they will 6 Summary Report August 2010

11 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING be as quiet as or quieter than current TTC vehicles and that they meet Ministry of Environment (MOE) standards. Q: What happens if noise thresholds are exceeded? A: The prototype vehicle will arrive in 2012, at which point we will test its decibel levels. If the vehicles add more than 5 decibels to ambient background noise levels, mitigation will be implemented. Q: Why are the decibel levels for the current streetcars not posted? A: TTC advised that this information is posted online from the specific presentation given to Leslie Street residents on July 15. (Note: Subsequent to the meeting, TTC indicated the direct website link: Q: I am worried that vibration from the LRVs will negatively impact my residence s foundation on Leslie Street over the long-term. What assurances do you give to help mitigate these problems over the long-term? Don t forget about us! A: A motion was passed through the Toronto Transit Commission to designate Leslie Street a priority area for track maintenance. Additionally, vehicle maintenance will be more rigourous for the new LRVs even though they will be more reliable than current streetcars. LRV wheels will be measured and tested every six months. The TTC is paying a premium for the new wheels in order to minimize noise and vibration impacts. The LRV design is such that weight is better proportioned across the vehicle. Specific noise and vibration testing will be carried out for Leslie Street. Overall, our maintenance plans do consider the long-term. 4.3 Landscape Design Q: What is the width of the greenspace around the site? A: The landscape competition area extends from the curb to the retaining wall. If you re looking along Leslie Street, this width is about 18 metres. Along Lake Shore Boulevard, the width is about the same, between 15 and 18 metres. (Clarification note: The width of landscape area north of Commissioners Street from the retaining wall to the curb edge is approximately 40 m. From the retaining wall to Martin Goodman Trail along Leslie Street, the width is approximately 18 m.) Q: Will landscaping occur at the Russell / Connaught Yard? A: As stated by Councillor Bussin, issues regarding the Russell Yard will be addressed separately and at a later time than those related to Leslie Street, but they assuredly will be discussed as soon as possible. Summary Report August

12 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Q: How are jury members for the landscape design competition going to be held accountable for their decisions? A: The City of Toronto Urban Design division is overseeing the jury process. They will ensure the jury reviews all public comments submitted in a report before they make any decision. Q: Can Queen Street be incorporated into the landscape design competition as Leslie Street was? A: Queen Street is out of the project scope. (Note: TTC is pleased to confirm the winning design firm will be hired by TTC to examine streetscape improvements for Leslie Street as far north as Queen Street. This was the most common recommendation received from residents at our last community meeting in May, 2010.) 4.4 Public Consultation Concerns Q: Can we still take our case against the site location chosen for the facility to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB)? A: The project is undertaken according to the Transit Project Assessment Process. Once the Environmental Project Report is complete, there will be a 30 day period in which the public will be able to comment on it directly to the Minister of the Environment. The Minister will look at comments related specifically to the natural environment and culture and heritage features. After the comments have been reviewed, the Minister can make one of three rulings. First, the minister may tell the TTC it can go ahead with the project with no revisions. Second, he may require the TTC to do further study and consultation. Third, he may give approval to the project but subject to certain conditions. There are no applications with respect to this project for third party appeal opportunities to the Ontario Municipal Board. The site has been designated. The only application that has to be made, the site approval application, is as-of-right. The TTC secured a preliminary project review from the City of Toronto before starting with this project several months ago. The TTC wanted to make sure the City had total compliance with the zoning law. Q: If the site location cannot be changed, why is the TTC even bothering to host this meeting? A: Although the process cannot incorporate public input into all aspects of the project, there are many cases where public input has influenced the direction of the project. At the very outset of the project, an Eastern Avenue location for the Facility was being investigated. Residents and businesses located near the Eastern Avenue site unanimously raised disapproval to this location, which was dropped. Additionally, landscaping was originally allocated to only the greenspace surrounding the Facility 8 Summary Report August 2010

13 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING and was to be designed in-house. The landscape design competition was a key recommendation from the community and the winning firm will now be hired to extend design improvements on Leslie Street to Queen Street. Access to Leslie Street properties was also a major public concern early in the project. Following intial consultations, the TTC s dedicated right-of-way option was taken off the table in direct response to residents concerns to ensure access to Leslie properties is maintained. Overall, TTC certainly recognizes there are still concerns but is trying to provide many opportunities for the TTC and the community to work together to improve the project. Q: The public consultation for this project seems to be just a one-way conversation. Can the public actually effect change? Can the TTC publish exactly where decision points are, where the public has had input, and how the input has been incorporated into the process? A: We can clearly demonstrate where public input has made a difference. As noted, one example is the fact that the site was not placed on Eastern Avenue due to overwhelming public opposition to this idea. Another example is that the TTC originally proposed a right-of-way on the Leslie Street connection track, an idea that has been abandoned because it would have adversely affected access for residents on Leslie. Some concerns have certainly been addressed, but others remain (e.g., there are residents in opposition to building the site at Lake Shore and Leslie). The process is not perfect, but we are trying to be as transparent as possible. This is not a scientific process, but we must work within the confines of the project to incorporate feedback wherever possible. C: This situation is uncomfortable for everyone. (Note: Comment noted by the TTC.) C: Public consultation for this project has been unsatisfactory. Money should be allocated to local groups for legal funding, since local groups are not empowered enough to go up against the TTC and the political panel that influences it. (Note: Comment noted. The changes to the project based on public feedback were highlighted. TTC recognizes that there are residents who do want the Facility at all and is making efforts to integrate it into the neighbourhood in a sensitive manner.) C: The notification flyer for tonight s meeting called it an information meeting. There is a lack of defined ways for citizens to be engaged and understand their rights and responsibilities. (Note: The purpose of the meeting was to gather input on specific concerns and bring them to the attention of the planning team. Part of the presentation outlines the Transit Project Assessment Summary Report August

14 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Process and planning context. Previously, staff notified all residents prior to the City Council process to ensure they could depute directly to elected officials before a decision was made on the site. Motions were made at Council to ensure mitigation will be implemented where it is required and to ensure the project is integrated into Martin Goodman Trail and Leslie Greening.) 4.5 Site Location Q: Will the new facility function like the Hillcrest Yard? If so, why not retrofit Hillcrest to accommodate the new LRVs? A: Hillcrest is used for overhauls, not regular maintenance. Hillcrest will maintain its function once the new LRVs arrive. The Ashbridges facility will function like the Roncesvalles and Russell Yards do now, in that it will be used for regular maintenance and LRV storage purposes. Thus, the Ashbridges site is necessary to accommodate the new LRVs. There is also insufficient room at Hillcrest. Q: Tours of the Hillcrest, Roncesvalles, and Russell Yards should be provided to interested members of the community to let us understand what is being built in our area. The air quality outside of Hillcrest was awful today. I walked around it and it emitted many volatile organic compounds (VOCs). If similar pollutants are going to exude from the Ashbridges Yard, people using the Martin Goodman Trail will be adversely affected. Will you allow the community to have a tour of Hillcrest? A: Historically, Hillcrest has not provided tours, but we will check again to see if this might be possible. (Note: The request was once again made and staff were advised by the General Superintendent of Rail Cars that tours are not given at Hillcrest. The following information was also provided: Hillcrest specifically Harvey Shop is a backshop operation providing support for major overhauls and/or repairs on TTC s streetcar and bus fleets. TTC does not operate revenue service out the Hillcrest facility due to the lack of space, its location, and the significant vehicular traffic in and out of the yard. With the arrival of the new low floor LRVs the operation will change slightly due to the size of the new cars. Our current fleet is made up mostly of LRVs that are 15.3 meters in length; whereas the new LRVs will be 30 meters in length. These new cars will not fit in the existing maintenance bays at Harvey Shop (at Hillcrest), nor is the height of the existing building suitable for maintenance of the roof-mounted equipment on the new cars. Major and minor components will be removed from the cars at the Roncesvalles, Russell, and Ashbridges Bay facilities and then transferred to Harvey Shop for overhaul or repair. As far as the suggestion that VOC emissions at Hillcrest are not meeting MOE standards, TTC is well within the required limits, as overseen by the Safety Department s Environment Services.) 10 Summary Report August 2010

15 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Q: Would it be possible for the new council (following the municipal election in October) to review and reconsider the decision to build the maintenance and storage facility at the Ashbridges Bay site? A: Given that there is a twelve month window in which Council may overturn a decision, altering the decision is possible but highly unlikely. This is a necessary facility, and there is little will to change the location. (Note: The other location at Unwin that received public support in the June 2009 meetings was not selected for many reasons such as multiple railway crossings and the need for a new bridge to replace an existing one-lane bridge.) C: Ashbridges Bay is an inappropriate location for the facility. (Note: Opposition to this site is recognized and TTC is trying to do what it can to address concerns. TTC has to construct similar facilities across Toronto for future Transit City expansion and it is very difficult to locate such facilities that are needed to support transit.) 4.6 Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant Q: Missing from the list of impacts in your presentation is the fact that this facility is going to take away land from the Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant (ABTP). You will be misinforming the province by omitting this fact from the Environmental Project Report. Why have you omitted this important impact? A: Toronto Water has indicated publicly that it does not need the land for plant expansion. (Note: A community meeting was held on this specific topic on April 19, 2010, the minutes of which are posted on the project website. The General Manager of Toronto Water confirmed that the land adjacent to the ABTP for the future TTC facility is not needed for future wastewater capacity at the ABTP. The proposed TTC facility would not affect plant operations and all future needs can be accommodated without that parcel of land.) Q: How will the Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant meet its odour requirement at the new maintenance facility where the impacts are likely to be high? Will it cost more to mitigate the odours? A: The question of odours will be confirmed by Toronto Water. (Note: Toronto Water has subsequently indicated that there will be no additional costs to meet their odour requirements.) Q: How will the Ashbridges Bay Wastewater Treatment Plant be concealed after the berm is removed? A: The maintenance building will be approximately 14 metres high, which is approximately the same height as the berm, so the Facility will block the view of the plant in a similar way to the berm. Summary Report August

16 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET 4.7 Connaught / Russell Yard CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Q: Residents on Connaught Avenue presently have the same problems that will affect Leslie Street in the future. There is no dust control in place right now, and we have to clean our windows daily. There are no mitigation measures in place. We have to constantly advocate for ourselves. The air quality on Connaught is poor, so I fear for Leslie. Why have Connaught Avenue residents not been included in the mitigation plan and process? Can we be included? Will the TTC commit to being proactive on this issue? A: The TTC went door-to-door to ensure Connaught residents became involved in this project before the route for the connection track was chosen and Connaught Avenue was being considered. There was much opposition to using Connaught Avenue and it was important that Connaught residents were able to raise these concerns at the April meeting. We will talk to City Services regarding cleaning the dust. The Ashbridges Bay project is new infrastructure and that is why it is undergoing a Transit Project Assessment as compared to Connaught Street. The process for installing mitigation measures is different for new facilities and existing facilities, so the situation on Connaught is different than that on Leslie. That said, the concerns are important and we will follow-up to confirm when new tracks will be installed on Connaught to reduce noise and vibration on your street. (Note: Councillor Bussin added that Connaught Avenue residents will go through a similar mitigation process but at a later date, and that this she had made a motion to this effect at Council.) Q: Will noise be mitigated at the Russell Yard? A: This issue will be examined at a later date. Replacement of the tracks is the first step. 4.8 Construction Q: Was it indicated in your presentation that vegetation removal will begin August 1? A: No. To clarify, it was indicated that due to the Migratory Birds Act, vegetation removal will be only be allowed between August 1 and April 14 in any given year. TTC will not begin any soil removal until the Transit Project Assessment is completed. 4.9 Streetcars versus Buses Q: Streetcars are not the best option for public transit. Electric buses are superior due to the facts they can circumvent obstacles, they are far less expensive than LRVs, and they will likely run more frequently than LRVs. Why are electric buses not being considered? A: Buses do not attract the same ridership as LRVs. LRVs have a much higher passenger capacity than buses. On high-density routes, you would need many buses 12 Summary Report August 2010

17 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING to match the passenger capacity of LRVs, including a greater number of drivers. To install by-pass lanes to allow buses to pull over would likely require permanent removal of parking spaces on downtown streets. In the long-term, LRVs are more cost-effective than buses. Vehicle bunching will be reduced with the new LRVs. In sum, there is a whole series of advantages for LRVs compared to buses. Q: Electric buses are one-twelfth the cost of LRVs, not including infrastructure costs. Why are electric buses not being considered on a purely fiscal level? A: Analysis shows that LRVs are a cheaper option in the long-run. (Note: Equally important is that LRVs draw more ridership than buses can. It would also take multiple buses on the road to match the capacity of one LRV, so the operating costs for LRVs are more efficient.) 4.10 Environmental Project Report Q: Who is writing the Environmental Project Report (EPR)? A: The EPR is being written jointly by AECOM and the TTC. Q: When and where will the EPR be made available? A: A notice of completion will be widely posted and distributed once the EPR is complete. It will be available on the project website, at the South Riverdale Community Health Centre, and at various libraries. If you have other suggestions as to where hard copies should be made available, please let us know. Q: What is addressed in the EPR? A: Five main topics are addressed in the EPR: natural environment (e.g., soil, water,); air quality (e.g., mitigation during construction, monitoring, dust control); traffic and transportation (e.g., detailed traffic reports, mitigation through signal changes); socioeconomic and land use environment (e.g., property values, cash-in-lieu options); and noise and vibration (e.g., current noise and vibration data, commitments from the TTC for mitigation throughout the project). Q: Will the report be explained to us through public consultation? A: We will prepare a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to address common questions and concerns. The EPR will have an executive summary to help facilitate the understanding of its contents. If you have specific questions about the EPR, you are encouraged to contact Lito Romano, the Community Liaison Officer, and/or go into the TTC office where we would be pleased to talk to you about the report directly. Summary Report August

18 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET 4.11 Design Considerations CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Q: I am pleased about the landscape design competition, as the aesthetics of the site are important. In the same vein, the building in the facility should not be utilitarian, but should rather be iconic. Will there be a design panel to review the building design, and if not, why not? A: The TTC is committed to design excellence. The plans are going to the City of Toronto s design review panel for their input in September. Q: How is public input helping to ensure the design of the building is iconic? A: The building has been designed by Strasman Architects to be modern, state-of-theart, and iconic. It will incorporate unique wave forms, lots of glass, and one section will replicate the aesthetics of an early type of streetcar. It will be built to Toronto Green Development Standards Traffic Q: Has the traffic study looked at increased traffic on Knox Avenue due to hindered access on Leslie Street? A: Knox Avenue is not currently included in the traffic study. We will look into this, but please recall that the majority of the LRV traffic will occur outside of normal rush hour periods. C: The traffic impact will be substantial. The last traffic study conducted in the area is from Council voted on this project without enough information about traffic impacts. (Note: A draft Executive Summary which included preliminary findings from the traffic study was presented to Council before the vote on June 9, 2010.) 4.13 Other Q: Streetcars on the 501 route often short-turned instead of going to Neville Park. Will this problem be remedied with the new LRVs? A: We will pass this concern on to the TTC s service planning group. (Note: TTC Service Planning subsequently provided the following update: The new LRVs will allow TTC to better regulate service on all of the existing streetcar routes, including 501 Queen, which will reduce the number of short-turns required to maintain scheduled service. However, because the 501 route operates in mixed traffic and is subject to traffic delays and events (e.g., non-ttc construction) which interrupt regular service, we expect there will continue to be a requirement for some degree of short-turning on the route after the arrival of the new LRVs.) 14 Summary Report August 2010

19 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING C: I attended and recorded the Council debate on this project, and you may be interested to know that Councillor Bussin voted in favour of placing the facility at the Ashbridges Bay site. Summary Report August

20 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Appendix A July 28, 2010 Public Meeting Summary TTC Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility for New Streetcars and Leslie Street Connecting Track On July 28, 2010, the TTC held a public meeting from approximately 6:30 9:00 p.m. to discuss the Transit Project Assessment Process for the TTC Ashbridges Bay Facility including Leslie Street connection tracks. The meeting was held at the Toronto Fire and EMS Training Centre (895 Eastern Avenue, Toronto). The meeting facilitator, Jim Faught of Lura Consulting welcomed attendees and outlined the agenda for the meeting. After some welcoming remarks, Adrienne Long of the TTC delivered a presentation. The rest of the agenda was devoted to a question and answer period between attendees and the project team. Councillor Sandra Bussin (Beaches-East York, Ward 32) thanked the audience for their attendance, and explained that this meeting was the third in a series of meetings regarding the Leslie Street connecting track for the Maintenance and Storage Facility. Previous to this meeting, the project team met with homeowners and businesses on Leslie Street. Similar meetings will be conducted with Connaught Avenue residents, but this undertaking will be separate from the Leslie Street mitigation strategy. Councillor Bussin also made reference to the Landscape Design Competition for the site, asking the community to please look at the three plans posted online. She announced that information meetings about the designs would be taking place on August 8 th, 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at Lake Shore Boulevard and Leslie Street and on August 10 th, 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Ashbridges Bay Park (Lake Shore Boulevard and Coxwell Avenue). Input from the community about the designs is very important for the decision-making process, and will be reported to a design jury. Following Councillor Bussin, David Nagler of the TTC provided some additional opening remarks. He stated that the TTC was looking forward to working with residents on enhanced streetscape options on Leslie Street, and acknowledged that this has been an extremely difficult project. David thanked the community for devoting so much of its time to discussing these important issues. He cited some examples of the influence public input has had on the project, such as the TTC s decision to abandon a right-of-way track system for the new streetcars in order to maintain access levels in and out of residences and businesses on Leslie Street. David also reminded community members of the informational sessions regarding the Landscape Design Competition being held on Augsust 8 th and 10 th. The designs were influenced by public feedback from a meeting on the competition held on May 19 th, 2010, and residents should indicate their preference. The TTC will be taking comments on the design options until August 23 rd, and a report summarizing all feedback will be posted online shortly afterwards. Finally, 16 Summary Report August 2010

21 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING David noted that the project while extremely difficult will allow the TTC to provide the needed maintenance to increase the carrying capacity of its streetcar fleet by thirty percent, and also increase accessibility for all streetcar users. Service on the 501 should be improved for the local community. Following David s opening remarks, Jim Faught noted that a comment form was available on the meeting s handout, and encouraged the community to submit their thoughts. Before giving the floor to Adrienne Long, Jim asked that audience members hold their questions until after the presentation. Adrienne Long of the TTC welcomed attendees and delivered a presentation on the potential effects and mitigation strategies for the Leslie Street connection track for the Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility in anticipation of the arrival of the TTC s new Light Rail Vehicles (LRVs) in Adrienne explained some of the potential impacts of the connection track, such as increased noise levels. The process and the timing of the project were presented, including issues regarding property issues, structural impacts, and construction management. The main subject matter of the Environmental Project Report was outlined. Several of the designs to reduce noise from the LRVs and their tracks were explained. Following a question and answer period, the meeting was adjourned. Presentation slides from this meeting will be posted on the project website at Summary Report August

22 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY FOR NEW STREETCARS AND LESLIE STREET CONNECTING TRACK PUBLIC MEETING Appendix B Public Meeting Notification 18 Summary Report August 2010

23 Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility for New Streetcars and Leslie St. Connecting Track Notice of Public Meeting Wednesday July 28, 2010 The Toronto Transit Commission is hosting an information meeting on the Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility and the associated connecting track. This is an opportunity to learn more about this facility and the measures that are being considered to provide a reliable and fully accessible transit service. The meeting will address impacts and mitigation measures for such issues, as the removal of contaminated soil, noise and vibration levels and traffic associated with this project. Meeting Details Date: Wednesday July 28, 2010 Time : 6:30pm 9:00pm Location: Toronto EMS and Fire Academy (895 Eastern Avenue) Project Background The City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission have ordered 204 new streetcars (Light Rail Vehicles) which will provide significant improvements: Low floor accessibility for people with disabilities, seniors and families with strollers, bicycle storage Almost double the capacity of current streetcars Multiple doors and a proof of payment system to significantly speed boarding and exiting Design enhancements to reduce noise and vibration The TTC and Toronto Council have approved a new facility for the storage of one hundred new streetcars at the Ashbridges Bay site, located at the southeast corner of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Leslie Street. The approval also includes the Leslie Street connection track, from Queen Street to Commissioner Street. This facility is required to support the new streetcars

24 which will begin to replace the current fleet in Background details are available at: Transit Project Assessment Process The environmental impact of the Ashbridges Bay LRV Maintenance and Storage Facility and connection tracks will be assessed in accordance with the Transit Project Assessment (TPA) Process as prescribed in Ontario Regulation 231/08, Transit Projects and Greater Toronto Transportation Authority Undertakings (2008). As part of the Transit Project Assessment Process, the TTC is holding a Public Meeting to present the proposed site layout for the Maintenance and Storage Facility and the connection track, along with its potential effects and recommended mitigation measures. There will be an opportunity to incorporate comments received from the Public Meeting into the Environmental Project Report (EPR). A public notice of study completion will then be issued to commence the 30 day review period for the EPR.. Contact Us Please forward all comments and questions by August 6, 2010 to: Lito Romano TTC Community Liaison 5160 Yonge Street, 13 th Floor Toronto, ON M2N 6L9 Tel: Fax: E mail: lito.romano@ttc.ca Under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act and the Environmental Assessment Act, unless otherwise stated in the submission, any personal information such as name, address, telephone number and property location included in a submission will become part of the public record for this matter and will be released if requested to any person.

25 Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility for New Streetcars and Leslie Street Connecting Track Notice of Commencement of Transit Project Assessment Process Background The City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission have ordered 204 new streetcars (Light Rail Vehicles) which will provide significant customer service improvements: > Low-floor accessibility for people with disabilities, seniors, families with strollers, bicycle storage > Almost double the passenger capacity of current streetcars > Multiple doors and a proof of payment system to increase the speed of boarding and exiting > Design enhancements to reduce noise and vibration The Project A new Maintenance and Storage Facility is required to support the new streetcars which will begin to replace the current fleet in One hundred of the 204 new streetcars will be stored at the Ashbridges Bay site, located at the southeast corner of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Leslie Street. Connection tracks to the Facility will be constructed on Leslie Street from Commissioners Street to Queen Street as pictured in the map. Background details are available at: Leslie Street Connection Route The Toronto Transit Commission (on June 2) and Toronto City Council (on June 9) approved Leslie Street as the connecting route for the new streetcars from Queen Street to the future Ashbridges Bay Facility. Although new vehicle and track design technology is expected to reduce noise and vibration compared to existing streetcars, TTC will be conducting specific noise and vibration investigations for potentially affected properties on Leslie Street. Mitigation measures will be implemented where required. Furthermore, TTC will be undertaking consultation regarding potential streetscape upgrades on the Leslie Street connection route. The Transit Project Assessment (TPA) Process The environmental impact of the Ashbridges Bay LRV Maintenance and Storage Facility and tracks on Leslie Street from Queen Street to Commissioners Street will be assessed in accordance with the TPA Process as prescribed in Ontario Regulation 231/08, Transit Projects and Greater Toronto Transportation Authority Undertakings (2008). As part of the TPA Process, an Environmental Project Report is being prepared. A public Notice of Study Completion will be issued within 120 days, at which time the Environmental Project Report will be completed and posted publicly for a 30 day review period. Contact Us If you would like to be added to the project mailing list, share your comments or obtain more information, please contact: Lito Romano TTC Community Liaison Officer 5160 Yonge Street, 13th Floor Toronto, ON, M2N 6L9 Tel: Fax: lito.romano@ttc.ca Under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act and the Environmental Assessment Act, unless otherwise stated in the submission, any personal information such as name, address, telephone number and property location included in a submission will become part of the public record for this matter and will be released if requested to any person.

26 > > > > 查 以供公眾人士查閱 您 Lito Romano TTC Community Liaison Officer 5160 Yonge Street, 13th Floor Toronto, ON, M2N 6L

27 Welcome! Ashbridges Bay Light Rail Vehicle Maintenance & Storage Facility Transit Project Assessment Process Public Information Centre July 28, :30 9:00 pm EMS Academy 895 Eastern Ave. Toronto, ON Please Sign In

28 Why Do We Need New Light Rail Vehicles (LRVs)? Existing streetcars are 30 to 40 years old and have reached the end of their useful lives. Replacement fleet of 204 new low floor Light Rail Vehicles (LRVs) will: improve passenger flow and reduced crowding with multiple doors for entry/exit. enhance access for people with disabilities, seniors, families with strollers. carry 80% more passengers per vehicle. increase system capacity by 35% and will accommodate growth for 20 years. Delivery of LRVs to commence in Interior of new vehicle New Low Floor Light Rail Vehicle 2

29 City of Toronto s Future Direction: Promote Sustainability City of Toronto Official Plan initiatives include: reduce dependence on car protection of stable neighbourhoods integration of land use transportation pro-transit orientation intensification on transit corridors no new roads growth in travel demand transit 3

30 Why Do We Need a New Maintenance & Storage Facility (MSF)? New LRV design cannot be maintained at existing facilities. Insufficient amount of storage track at Roncesvalles and Russell carhouses. Roncesvalles and Russell carhouse required to store approximately 50 LRVs at each facility, including minor repairs/daily cleaning. 4

31 Key Project Milestones Meeting Date May 2008 June 16, 17, 18, 2009 December 16, 2010 Purpose Commission approved Facility Master Plan TTC Site Selection Open House TTC Commission Meeting Site Selection February 18, 2010 TTC Preliminary Planning Public Open House #1 Introduce Transit Project Assessment (TPA) Process April 8, 2010 TTC Preliminary Planning Public Consultation Presentation #2 Present Technical Preferred Connecting Track Option May 18, 2010 May 19, 2010 June 2, 2010 June 9, 2010 June 24, 2010 July 14 & City of Toronto Public Works Committee Meeting Approve TTC use of Ashbridges Bay site TTC Landscape Design Competition Public Open House Meeting Ashbridges Bay site and Leslie Street Connecting Track approved by TTC Commission Ashbridges Bay site and Leslie Street Connecting Track approved City Council Notice of Commencement for TPA Process Meeting with Leslie Street Resident and Property Owners July 28, 2010 Transit Project Assessment Process Public Consultation Presentation #3 August 8 & 10, 2010 Landscape Design Competition Event 5

32 Planning Underway: Transit Project Assessment Process This project is being conducted under Ontario Regulation 231/08, Ontario s Transit Project Assessment Process. Key aspects include: Developed to accelerate the Environmental Assessment process for public transit projects. Six-month timeline from start to finish, including 30-day public review and 35-day MOE review periods. Fulfills requirements of Environmental Assessment Act, including assessment of potential environmental effects. Public, Agency and First Nations consultation will continue to be essential. The Minister of the Environment considers matters of provincial importance and constitutionally protected Aboriginal or treaty rights when reviewing the project. What are matters of provincial importance? Natural environment Cultural heritage. 6

33 What is the Transit Project Assessment Process? 7

34 Overview: the Study Area Recommended Ashbridges Bay MSF site located at Lake Shore Boulevard East & Leslie Street intersection. Leslie Street tracks will connect MSF to existing Queen Street East streetcar service. The City of Toronto Official Plan (2006) identifies Leslie Street as a future Higher Order Transit Corridor. 8 8

35 Recommended Site Layout Layout Features: Maintain 204 LRVs and store up to 100 LRVs. Includes a main building with a green roof designed in accordance with Toronto Green Standards, and an electrical substation. Approximately 470 employees to work at the facility. The facility will include the following activities: daily servicing and cleaning, preventative and corrective maintenance. On-site stormwater management pond. The majority of the LRVs will leave and return to the site outside of rush hour periods. 9

36 Recommended Leslie Street Connecting Track Design Track Design Features: LRVs will operate in mixed traffic (centre lanes). On street parking maintained. Access to all driveways and parking lots maintained. Four through lanes on Leslie Street between Queen Street and Commissioners Street. Existing left-turn lanes remain. LRVs will primarily operate outside of rush hour periods. 10

37 Effects Assessment The Transit Project Assessment Process assessed the potential effects associated with the facility and the connecting tracks based on the following factors: Natural Environment Noise and Vibration Potential effects of noise and vibration levels on sensitive receptors Terrestrial Hydrogeology Contaminated Soils Air Quality Potential effects of dust, odour, fine particulates, etc. on identified sensitive receptors Socio-Economic & Land Use Environment Potential effects on residences and businesses Archaeology, Cultural Heritage and First Nations Proposed & approved land uses Safety and operation of Martin Goodman Trail Potential Effects Traffic and Transportation Intersection operations Traffic operations Roadway parking/loading Constructability Operation and maintenance 11

38 Potential Effects Natural Environment Vegetation and Wildlife Key Effects: Removal of low quality vegetation habitat and trees that are not Provincially Significant. Mitigation: Removing vegetation between August 1 and April 14, to ensure bird nests are protected in order to be in compliance with the Migratory Birds Convention Act. Green roof on main building will sustain low herbaceous vegetation and provide some habitat for insects and birds. Trees removed that fall under the City s Tree By-Law (seven trees with diameter of 30 cm or higher at breast height (dbh) will be replaced at a 3-to-1 ratio (21 trees). New plantings will be incorporated into the Ashbridges Bay MSF landscape design. 12

39 Stormwater Management Potential Effects Natural Environment On-site Soil Key Effects: Stormwater quality and quantity. Mitigation: Utilize low impact development (LID) Best Management Practices and a wet pond. Final site grade will be higher than the estimated regional flood water level. Key Effects: Impacted soil (mound) to be removed from the site. Mitigation: Comply with the Risk Assessment Plan. Establish a Construction Liaison Group. Adhere to the Soil Removal and Capping Contract that: Complies with all federal, provincial and local licenses and certificates of approval. Identifies air quality and dust suppression measures. Identifies haul routes that minimize community effects. 13

40 Martin Goodman Trail Key Effects: Potential Effects Socio-economic & Air Quality Air Quality Key Effects: Site access and new tracks will cross the Martin Goodman Trail. Mitigation: The track design has been developed to combine the access with existing crossing point. Explore measures that may include signage, surface treatments on the path/sidewalk, signal control, bollards and audible warnings (bells, horns). During construction - potential for nuisance dust. During operations - servicing and maintenance activities have the potential to produce emissions. Mitigation: During construction - a dust control program would include dust suppression (water), road sweeping, and cleaning of vehicle tires. During operations - ventilation and capture and control systems, and energy efficient building design to reduce emissions. View of Martin Goodman Trail along the site 14

41 Noise & Vibration - at Site Potential Effects Noise & Vibration Noise & Vibration - along Leslie Street Assessment based on existing streetcar data. Measurement of noise and vibration of Prototype LRV in early 2012 to determine effects of new LRVs. Key Effects: For nearest residences (approximately 240 metres from site), noise levels may exceed MOE limits by two decibels (based on existing data). Vibration no effect resulting from MSF. Mitigation: Should noise levels remain above MOE limit, installation of an acoustic barrier along the north and west end of the site may be required to ensure noise levels are compliant with MOE Limit (Leq) (dba). Track-based technologies (e.g. lubrication) will assist in minimizing wheel screech. Key Effects: Noise - for residences 7 to 10 meters away from the tracks, noise levels would exceed MOE limits by up to 3 decibels. Vibration for residences up to 15 metres away from the tracks, vibration levels would exceed MOE limits. Mitigation: Depending on results of the noise and vibration modelling undertaken for Prototype LRV in 2012, the following measures will be explored further: Upgrades to the existing track-design to minimize vibration at the source. Receiver-side mitigation. 15

42 Reducing Noise and Vibration - New Wheels 16

43 Bogie Skirt to Reduce Noise 17

44 Potential Effects Traffic Key Effects: Safety and access to Maintenance and Storage Facility site (LRVs and automobiles). Some manageable challenges anticipated for Leslie Street during LRV operations, including the Leslie Street/Lake Shore Boulevard East intersection (as most will operate outside of rush hour periods). Mitigation: Review signal timings and LRV detection capabilities along Leslie Street to optimize traffic operations along the Leslie Street corridor. Lengthen northbound left turn lane on Leslie Street at Lake Shore Boulevard to facilitate turning movements. Existing traffic at the Leslie Street and Lake Shore Boulevard intersection Provide an exclusive southbound left turn lane on Leslie Street at Commissioners Street to facilitate LRV and vehicle movements; provide an exclusive westbound right turn lane and a shared left through lane for the east leg of Commissioners Street. Expected weekday use 230 LRV trips per day Most of the LRVs will operate outside of the morning and evening rush hour periods Existing traffic at the Leslie Street and Eastern Avenue intersection 18

45 Landscape Design Competition: Creating an Exciting Community Vision Landscape Design Competition launched to generate an exciting and green vision for the landscaping around the MSF. Three leading urban design landscape firms participating in the competition were introduced to the Public at the May 19 Public Meeting. The landscape design competition includes the areas between the existing curbs along Lake Shore Boulevard and Leslie Street to the planned Facility s outer boundary. You are invited to meet the designers and view the landscape concepts! Sunday, August 8, 2010 from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. at Leslie and Lake Shore Boulevard East Tuesday, August 10, 2010 from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. at Coxwell and Lake Shore Boulevard East. 19

46 Our Commitment to Consult Planning (TPA Process) Design (Landscape, Prototype Testing) Construction (Soil Removal, Facility and Connection Track) <We are Here> Consultation with local community throughout site planning, design and construction activities. Establishment of a Construction Liaison Group. Dedicated Community Liaison Officer: o o o o o Full-time on project. Responsible for communicating with residents, business and property owners and other community stakeholders. Point of contact for the community direct communication with Project Manager, Transportation Services and other City services. Complaints process. Regular updates via , website and community flyers. 20

47 Future Steps Fall 2010 Select Landscape Design Firm Develop selected design to detail design stage Engage community to develop concepts for Leslie Street connection File Environmental Project Report: Notice of Completion of Transit Project Assessment Process 30-day public and agency review period Anticipated receipt of Notice to Proceed from Ministry of the Environment after 35-day review period Late 2010 Spring/ Summer 2011 Spring 2012 Commence Soil Removal Commence MSF construction Commence Connection track construction 2013 Complete MSF and connection track construction 21

48 Contact Us For more information or to submit your comments: Web: Phone: Fax: By Mail: Lito Romano, Community Liaison Officer TTC, Transit City Department 5160 Yonge Street, 13th Floor Toronto, Ontario M2N 6L9 Comments would be appreciated by August 6, Thank you for your participation! 22

49 Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility for New Streetcars and Leslie St. Connecting Track Notice of Public Meeting Wednesday July 28, 2010 The Toronto Transit Commission is hosting an information meeting on the Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility and the associated connecting track. This is an opportunity to learn more about this facility and the measures that are being considered to provide a reliable and fully accessible transit service. The meeting will address impacts and mitigation measures for such issues, as the removal of contaminated soil, noise and vibration levels and traffic associated with this project. Meeting Details Date: Wednesday July 28, 2010 Time : 6:30pm 9:00pm Location: Toronto EMS and Fire Academy (895 Eastern Avenue) Project Background The City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission have ordered 204 new streetcars (Light Rail Vehicles) which will provide significant improvements: Low floor accessibility for people with disabilities, seniors and families with strollers, bicycle storage Almost double the capacity of current streetcars Multiple doors and a proof of payment system to significantly speed boarding and exiting Design enhancements to reduce noise and vibration The TTC and Toronto Council have approved a new facility for the storage of one hundred new streetcars at the Ashbridges Bay site, located at the southeast corner of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Leslie Street. The approval also includes the Leslie Street connection track, from Queen Street to Commissioner Street. This facility is required to support the new streetcars

50 which will begin to replace the current fleet in Background details are available at: Transit Project Assessment Process The environmental impact of the Ashbridges Bay LRV Maintenance and Storage Facility and connection tracks will be assessed in accordance with the Transit Project Assessment (TPA) Process as prescribed in Ontario Regulation 231/08, Transit Projects and Greater Toronto Transportation Authority Undertakings (2008). As part of the Transit Project Assessment Process, the TTC is holding a Public Meeting to present the proposed site layout for the Maintenance and Storage Facility and the connection track, along with its potential effects and recommended mitigation measures. There will be an opportunity to incorporate comments received from the Public Meeting into the Environmental Project Report (EPR). A public notice of study completion will then be issued to commence the 30 day review period for the EPR.. Contact Us Please forward all comments and questions by August 6, 2010 to: Lito Romano TTC Community Liaison 5160 Yonge Street, 13 th Floor Toronto, ON M2N 6L9 Tel: Fax: E mail: lito.romano@ttc.ca Under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act and the Environmental Assessment Act, unless otherwise stated in the submission, any personal information such as name, address, telephone number and property location included in a submission will become part of the public record for this matter and will be released if requested to any person.

51 TTC Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility Landscape Design Competition Public Tent Events August 8 and 10, 2010 Summary Report Prepared by Argyle Communications August 2010

52 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 August 8 and 10 Community Tent Events - Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility Landscape Design Competition 2. Public Notification 2.1 Posters 2.2 Mail and Distribution 2.3 Newspaper 2.4 Local Councillors 3. Summary of Feedback 3.1 Fleisher Ridout 3.2 gh3 3.3 Brown + Storey 4. Ranking of Design Preference 5. Compendium of Landscape Design Competition Feedback 6. Appendices A. Copy of Landscape Design Competition Question Card B. Public Notification Materials for Tent Events

53 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT 1. Introduction 1.1 Background The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) will require a new maintenance and storage facility for accommodation of the new fleet of 204 Light Rail Vehicles (LRV) ordered by the City of Toronto and the TTC. The new facility will be required in order to provide vehicle maintenance, repairs and service inspections for the new streetcars, as well as provide adequate storage capacity for the new fleet. The new facility will be constructed on a 20-acre site in the Portlands area of downtown Toronto, at the southeast corner of Lake Shore Boulevard East and Leslie Street. The location was one of six potential sites considered and was chosen based on proximity to the existing Queen Street streetcar line, property size, current vacancy, ability to meet the 2013 completion date, existing industrial and commercial land uses, and community feedback. Toronto City Council approved acquisition of the property to be transferred from the Toronto Port Authority to the TTC in December The new TTC Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility will store 100 of the new LRVs, with the remaining 104 vehicles stored at the Roncesvalles and Russell (Connaught) car houses. 1.2 August 8 and 10 Community Tent Events - Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility Landscape Design Competition On May 19, 2010, the City of Toronto and the TTC announced a landscape design competition for the new Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility. The competition was designed to generate an exciting vision that is consistent with the vision of the Leslie Street Greening initiative for the landscape around the future Ashbridges Bay facility. A jury led by the City of Toronto, Planning and Urban Design will review the public comments and rankings prior to assessing the design concepts, and determining the successful design. Organizations represented on the jury include: City of Toronto, Planning and Urban Design South Riverdale Community Health Centre Waterfront Toronto Shim-Sutcliffe Architects and the Waterfront Toronto Design Review Panel TTC 1

54 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT Three leading urban design landscape firms participated in the competition: Brown + Storey Architects, Fleisher Ridout and gh3. A public meeting on May 19, 2010 provided the community with an opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas for consideration by the landscape design firms. In addition, the landscape design competition allowed for direct feedback and involvement from the community, by giving the community an opportunity to speak directly with the designers and comment on the designs at two community tent events in the Portlands area in August. The first event was held on August 8, 2010, between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., at the southeast corner of Lakeshore Boulevard and Leslie Street, where the facility would be located. The second event was held on August 10, 2010 in Ashbridges Bay Park on the southeast corner of Coxwell Avenue and Lake Shore Boulevard East. Representatives for each of the design landscape firms were present: Brown + Storey Architects: Stephen King, Pamela Tung and Michael Kim Fleisher Ridout: Brad Fleisher, Tom Ridout and Casey Morris gh3: Diana Gerrard, Pat Hanson, Raymond Chow and Andrea Mantin In addition, representatives from the TTC and project consultant Aecom were present to answer any questions from the community. Each of the three firms created eight panels that illustrated their vision for the landscape around the new facility, four of which included an acoustic wall and four of which did not include the wall. The panels provided a visual component enabling members of the community to visualize the facility. The panels from the design firms explaining their visions are posted on the project website: In addition to expressing their thoughts to representatives from the firms and the TTC, attendees were asked to comment directly on what they like about each of the designs. Attendees were also asked to rank the three firms in order of preference on their comment cards. Refer to Appendix A for a sample comment card. In addition, a website for the landscape design competition ( provided the community with the three designs and same visuals online that were available at the tent events. This allowed community members who were unable to attend or provide comments and rankings for the designs at the tent events to do so at their convenience online. 2

55 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT Pamphlets detailing information on the new streetcars were also available at both tent events, allowing members of the community to ask questions about the LRVs as well as the facility. This report summarizes the comments received at the August 8 and 10 tent events, as well as any comments which were received online at by the deadline provided of August 23, A total of 72 participants opted to sign in at the tent events, in addition to three media outlets (Global News, the Toronto Star and CBC s Here & Now). A total of 135 comments were received through the available channels. For a summary of comments received during the August tent events as well as online, refer to Section August 8 and 10 Landscape Design Competition - Results An analysis of all comment cards received at the tent events, as well as comments received online showed that of the three designs presented, Fleisher Ridout ranked first, gh3 second and Brown + Storey third. Section 4 provides a Summary of Feedback, including the main comments and concerns about each of the designs being considered. Finally, all comments received are detailed in Section Public Notification This section outlines the channels used to notify the public about the Ashbridges Bay TTC Facility Landscape Design Competition Tent Events on August 8 and 10, Refer to Appendix B for materials used for public notification. 2.1 Posters Starting on July 30, 2010, 400 colour posters were distributed publicizing the Landscape Design Competition tent events. Neighbourhood businesses were personally visited and asked to place an event poster on their storefront. Posters were placed on bulletin boards in the community. Each tent had posters prominently displayed. 2.2 Mail and Distribution All individuals and businesses that provided their contact information at past open houses and requested to be updated on the progress of the Ashbridges Bay project were sent notices for the two Landscape Design Tent Events. These notices were sent by first-class addressed mail on July 23, 2010, as well as by , where available. On July 29, 2010, an additional 18, 379 notices for the landscape design competition events 3

56 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT were delivered within the area of Kingston Road to Gerrard Street to the north, Lee Avenue to the east, Logan Avenue to the west, and south to the lake. 2.3 Newspaper A full-page colour advertisement was placed in the Beaches Mirror on August 5, Local Councillors Event details were shared with local councillors who promoted the event through their own distribution channels. 3. Summary of Feedback A summary of the main comments recorded during the two tent events that took place on August 8 and 10, 2010 and received through the Ashbridges Bay TTC Facility Landscape Design Competition website is located below. A compendium of the feedback received is provided in Section Fleisher Ridout Support for Design o This option ranked first among the three urban design firm plans considered. The majority of comments in favour of Fleisher Ridout cited a combination of greenery and water that mixed to create a park-like setting. o Preservation of the Martin Goodman Trail was important among respondents. o The abundance of open spaces and simple configuration of elements in the plan were favoured by many. o The attention paid to the site s ecological history was appreciated. Concerns about Design o Long-term maintenance issues of the water features such as the ponds, wetland meadow and water wall were raised. Specifically, if these options are more expensive to maintain and whether a budget for this has been allocated. o Linked to the maintenance issues, concerns about the initial cost that the concept would entail. Some saw the water features as requiring increased upfront expenditure in addition to greater maintenance costs. o Some cyclists oppose dismounting in order to cross the streetcar tracks. 4

57 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT 3.2 gh3 Support for Design o This option ranked second among the three urban design firm plans considered. The feedback featured some strong opinions, both favourable and opposed. o The green wall concept was particularly popular among respondents. o The wall was seen as hiding the streetcar facility effectively. Concerns about Design o The wall was also singled out as a concern, with pedestrian and cyclist safety being the main issue. Some felt the area near the wall would be especially unsafe at night. o Maintenance of the green wall was an issue. There were concerns about the long-term cost involved and how the green wall would hold up during winter. o Others commented that the wall is too imposing and does not fit well with the area. o Some felt that the space is too confined and closed-off from the surrounding area compared to the other plans. 3.3 Brown + Storey Support for Design o This option ranked third among the three urban design firm plans considered. Some respondents enjoyed the modern take on the site s design. o Despite some concerns about structures in the plan, some were in favour of the installations and support for public art. o The availability of open space was appreciated. o The red frieze was the most supported design element. Concerns about Design o Many respondents commented that there were too many unnecessary and obtrusive structures. o Others commented that the bike path needs to be straightened to allow for more direct and efficient cycling. o A comparatively large number of respondents left a very concise or no response on the comment field for this option. 5

58 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT 4. Ranking of Design Preferences Respondents providing feedback for the TTC Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility Landscape Design Competition were asked to rank the designs in order of preference from one to three. These numbers were collected, sorted, totalled and averaged to determine the ranking of design preference. The results show that of the three designs presented, Fleisher Ridout ranked first, gh3 second and Brown + Storey third. Section 3, above, provides a Summary of Feedback, including the main comments and concerns about each of the designs being considered, and Section 5 is a compendium of all feedback received. 5. Compendium of Landscape Design Competition Feedback Please see next page. 6

59 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT # Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher Storey design? Ridout design? Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Rank Hands down, the Fleisher Ridout gets my vote for the following reasons: 1) the incorporation of trees, plants, grasses, and flowers produce a mixed vegetation which allows for a calm, natural environment 1 2) the inclusion of water adds serenity and balance to the landscape 3) the roofing of the building in the background is very pleasing to the eye All five members of my family agree with the Fleisher Ridout design! 2 Nothing. Nothing. 3 Red frieze. Stone hedgerow. 4 I don't like it much at all. Lots of green space; designed so the space is still usable for bikes, pedestrians, etc. Well thought out in terms of keeping with the neighbourhood. It addresses the human scale of the M.G. Trail; separates high speed trail users from walkers at the corner; creates a It scares the living daylights out of me that this could safe and enjoyable atmosphere; softens the wall with a possibly be built. slope of green. 5 Too much metal! I like the use of water features. Choice of materials. 6 The screen concept. COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK I like the mix of water and green area. I would add a water wall against the wall that is to hide the TTC building so the The red ribbon path amidst greenery (rocket bench). sound of the water somewhat drowns out the sound of the streetcar. 7 The lit up red wall. Varied paths and textures (feels natural) offering the most shade and dealing with water run-off. Most able to accommodate various activities. Soundproofing from traffic but it feels too cut off and tunnel-like. Too ominous. 8 Public art is cool! 9 Not much. Too modern. Not much. Kind of boring! More green space, blockage of noise, beautiful, park, public space. Very nice. Well thought out. Hides the mess of the streetcars. 7

60 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank I actually don't like the design of the Martin Goodman trail. The path network is non-functional and would not be safe or efficient for trail users and cyclists. This is a bad design as it does not allow cyclists to ride directly. Don't like the design. Straightening the bike path would help. Better transition at Lakeshore and Leslie. 12 More playground. Do not like - bike path not clear - design not as well 13 thought out as others. Most open and visible, especially if using wrought-iron 14 screen. But also best visibility for street and Martin Goodman Trail It sounds the most sophisticated, but path ideas are confusing and the sculptures feel industrial. The Martin Goodman trail is continuous and direct. At the corner of Leslie and Lakeshore there is the alternate way to turn the corner over the bridge GOOD. However expecting cyclists to dismount at the streetcar tracks is not realistic. This design allows bike traffic to flow more freely. Very natural. Don't like the idea of dismounting to cross intersection. Both corners are very impressive. Tries to mask the height difference from street to TTC facility. Water features. Openness. Good context with surrounding. I like the water features, seems more park-like. Panels are nice. I don't like this one. No separated path for pedestrians. The hedgerow blocks are too close to the trail and block sightlines - NOT SAFE. Path is too confined. Do not like to be closed in on both sides of path by green wall. Simple and direct path for Martin Goodman Trail. The stone wall seems like a trap. I worry about safety. The living walls idea is nice, but too high, too close to road - seems like scene of serious accident as cars slide into wall. 17 The crystal elements. Don't like the large red wall. Like the water features and natural feeling. Too cold, monolithic. Does not feel like being outdoors. 18 Do not like as it breaks up the pathways too much and do not like the wall. Good use of water but may be too much maintenance and will look bad if not worked on (no budget). 19 Very well done. The best.?? 20 Nice modern designs with regard for each group involved. Beautiful integration of greenery, water. Just the most natural looking of the 3. Looks too cheap, ordinary. 21 Wonderful sense of "place." Playful. Sculptural yet allows for visual "penetration." Great use of plant material. Nice meandering flow along axes - longitudinally, transversely, perpendicularly. Bold design, low maintenance and hides the yard the best. Sense of permanence. Comforting. Good use of material. 22 Simplicity. Clean lines. Natural. Water features, boulevard feel with trees on Lakeshore, park-feel. 19th century French garden approach. 23 Not much. Too much like downtown. The landscaping. The outdoor look and hedgerow. 24 The ponds and open concept. Nothing. We should take down walls not put them up. 25 Looks modern and new, but still friendly, environment. Lots of nature. Can't see the buildings. 8

61 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank The sculptures will be great for postering. Use of water, plants and landform. It will be a great place to panhandle behind the wall. 27 Modern light. Still green. Lots of trails, open, unbroken. Tries to hide the TTC building. 28 Interesting screens. Visually looks the best. Liked the green wall. 29 Very much prefer this design. More green, vegetation, but use 2.5 m hedgerow. 30 The organic nature of the pathways. Don't care for metal sculptures and red wall. The water features and tree barriers to the road. Don't care for back wall. The living walls of green covered plant walls and idea of seating. Don't like cement barrier to road. 31 Seems to be more greenery. 32 Didn't like/understand the sculptures. Respect for water and what was once here - a natural lakeshore. The living walls would be beautiful. 33 RESPONDENT ONLY RECORDED RANKING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN PREFERENCES The concept is GREAT and all about connecting to the 34 I like the red frieze screen - it adds colour and the history of the area. The water processing symbiotic identification of the streets is a nice touch. relationship with the TTC as well as the bike/walking path connectivity. 35 Too many unneeded structures. Most natural, best structural. Nothing really. 36 All the plants. Did not like statues. Water and bridges. Panels with pics. Nil. Hate stonewalls. 37 Need hardwood trees. Need hardwood trees. Hideous. 38 Vertical monuments. Wish they were arranged to relate to the vertical Gardiner supports along Lakeshore. 39 Too static, unnatural. Series of ponds with bridges keep neighbourhood feel of the area. Looks least intrusive into nature; concern - energy efficient? What about preserving birds, gophers and other animals currently living in the area? I don't really like the wall concept at all - though it is simple and allows for a large bike/walk/run path. Green walls but I am concerned that north of the Lakeshore looking south it will look like a large grey industrial mall. No square, unnatural. 40 Path system. Use of water. The streetcar barn isn't visible. 41 Open feel, sculptural elements, playful. Tie to region's ecology. 42 Modern. Mmm - H20. Very green. 43 Not much, definitely not a fan of abstract structures. Retention pond. Green lined wall and red pathway. 44 RESPONDENT ONLY RECORDED RANKING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN PREFERENCES 45 The structures and modernity. Like the openness and water effect. Focus on the trail. 9

62 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank The green space. 48 I like the "open" look to it. I like the landscaping. 49 The "sculptures." This design has a natural feel, as if you are going to an urban park. The use of confierous trees to hide the yard in winter is important. The key is minimal view of the trainyard while creating an inviting atmosphere and meeting ground. The "berm" effect, rather than an overpowering wall or fence - overall a more natural, pleasing look. Mainly because it hides the train yard from view and the wall is preferable to the ugly brown story fence (looks like G-20 fence)! The mesh is not nice, but without would be fine - also adding green into fence design helps. I don't think the 2 walls on each side of the trail will be safe for people at night. The TTC "bench." 50 Screen better than red frieze. Nothing. Stone hedgerow covered with plants. 51 Green space at corner Leslie and Lakeshore - no "berms." 52 Love this one! Beautiful balance of 'natural' and 'built.' Love the stone hedgerow. 53 The best - needs to ensure a path. Not that inspired. It could be changed to be better. Interesting but does not allow for air flow. 54 The blending of contemporary design elements and natural materials and vegetation - it will mature with time. It has an open inviting feel. I don't. The claim that the wall will filter air - although I dislike the enclosed feel it provides. 55 Red frieze. Wetland/water feature. Savanna. 56 Economical. Ghost columns/architecture. Not much. Hedgerow. Green lining. Protected green path. 57 Pond, train graphic wall, openness. This design worries me as it creates a corridor that does not seem safe for women exercising alone. 58 The strange objects littering the pathway - the angular pillar things - look random and unnecessary. Toronto has enough unexplained crap all over the place. Boring. This one has my vote. 59 Old Ontario growth garden/plants. 10

63 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank It has elements of art installations and natural evolution of plant life that will change in fluid way over time. It is a thoughtful design to reflect Leslieville and the Beach. Both residents and tourists can enjoy it (repeatedly or only once). Like the screen: concept A but use the woven concrete image. Add evergreens for winter. The water feature and the ability to have different types of walls (vegetated wall) and the water features. The walking paths for people. I really dislike the stone wall. You can call it a hedge but the grey stones, the wire mesh look institutional and cold. It would be a less inviting space. 61 Winter views - interesting, urban. Green! 62 All I can say is the bike path along Lakeshore. Should be straight (as it is now). Landscaping to protect it or make it further from the car traffic is good. Separation from walkers/bladers is good too. Lots of trees and hedges. 63 Focal points, artwork makes for interesting walks. 64 Open space, good overview of the space, better safety and security. The Fleisher Ridout design is the most appealing, with the most natural approach. Green wall, can't see traffic. The gh3 design, with the very high wall would make the corner and entry point to the Leslie St Spit extremely uninviting. We need our outdoor spaces to be open and as natural as possible. I would hate to see this design win. 67 The Brown & Storey design has obtrusive and unnecessary hulking shapes. The Fleisher Ridout plan seems to respect the landscape best, while providing a natural-feeling screen. The gh3 design seems claustrophobic and would likely make me feel unsafe as a woman alone. 68 I would prefer the Brown and Storey plan with the Red Frieze as my second choice. The gh3 plan nicely hides the buildings etc and yet, in and of itself is an incredible design piece that will draw people in to enjoy the gardens. I hope very much that this is the plan that is chosen. I much prefer their 5m plan with the green at the corner of Leslie and Lakeshore (i.e. as on the poster and panel 4, page 4). The only suggestion I would have would be to increase the number of areas in the stone hedgerow that open up to Lakeshore in order to make it more safe I m primarily thinking of women jogging in the morning and at dusk when there aren t necessarily a lot of other foot traffic on the path. 11

64 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank I like the Brown and Storey "open" fence, but not their "frieze". "Stonehenge" at the corner looks tatty, why not use real rock of a more human size? Fleisher Ridout has good ideas regarding water areas, but, if static, they could become breeding ponds for mosquitos; slippery when icy in the winter. Overall I prefer the Fleisher Ridout concepts. Less b/s in the write up, too! The gh3 proposal makes the whole area look like a Mayan temple and is confining. I am sure that Gabion type baskets in stainless steel would be expensive. Safety at evening and nighttime with the canalised walkways concerns me. 70 Clear sightlines and access to the street. Much less confined, compared to gh3 - kid and dog friendly. Giant pillars a bit awkward. Not really a fan. Would prefer trees. Very clear to the road - will be used by people, I'm sure. Love the wetland idea, as the portlands used to be wetlands. Much more open, compared to the gh3 proposal Path is very cut off from the street; I don't feel as though - makes it more kid and dog friendly. I would love to see people will want to use it as a result. People are wary of the Fleisher Ridout proposal in that location. Very natural that area and will not be quick to enjoy this location, if and true to the site's heritage. Open spaces are kid and there aren't clear sight lines & access routes to the street. family friendly & the winding paths would be great for Not terribly natural looking. Very boxy. cyclists, runners and pedestrians alike. I think it would be a great addition to the neighbourhood! 71 Brown and Storey design seems to be my choice as the sculptures reflect and clearly mark the entrance to the Leslie Street Spit... a place which I use ( with bike and on foot) frequently. The idea of there being a visual landmark will be of use to cars, pedestrians and bicyclists. The proposed work from this firm also makes getting from the Lakeshore to Ashbridges interesting and yet expedient... also there is a certain amount of wildness to it again reflecting the nature of the spit. The barrier between the pedestrian areas and the street car barns is also solid... I see no use in exposing, even partially, the activity there. 72 The open feeling. Use of water. Simple lines of walls. Use of run-off water to fill water features; curved path at the Leslie/Lakeshore corner (makes sense for cyclists) 73 Scultupral elements interesting reflection of materials near site. berms up against the wall; echo of TTC history in images on wall. Wall is an interesting concept. Recycling materials for walls and from site. Using at least some of the existing plantings,red path; green living idea. 12

65 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank Meandering paths, differing journeys, but where do they go? Sculptor to some degree, but unclear whether they will be too imposing, harsh. Historical wall of artistry. Natural regions: prairie, meadows, water. Stone, living green walls. 75 The horizontal figures. The use of the water and native vegetation. Unprogrammed play area. 76 Seasonal considerations. Undulations. Good to look at all year round. More classic. Green wall. Buffer effect. 77 Innovative sculpture. Movement in curvy paths. Water features near the road paths. Shaded paths. Although living plant walls are innovative, as a female I would be worried about my safety at night as the paths feel too enclosed, they look like tunnels. 78 Too conceptual. Not thought through yet. Prefer this design because it incorporates use of natural environment. Has appeal. Seemed bleak. Not sure about big walls. 79 Plant selection. Water feature. Looks most natural. Looks not easy to maintain. 80 Divided bike path. Seasonal vegetations. Sculptures which can be lit, I can see these being continued North up Leslie. Strong design elements that could be extended up Leslie. Cool public plaza. Ponds. Vegetation wall. Recreated berm idea. Red "seat". 81 Open space. Visually pleasing. Modern. Unique. 82 The different dimensions of the greenery. Also, it looks like N/A it has more open space. N/A 83 Brown "walls" and stand alone oblique art.? Berm, "natural". 84 Sculptural aspects--looks like art green space. Simply looks like a park. Noise reduction--protection from traffic. 85 Not much really. Water features. Marting Goodman Trail bridge. Simple design. 86 Don't like it. It seems conceptually confused. Well thought out way to integrate the yard and tracks with other uses. Not much. Too much stuff and too many tight turns with 87 Central elements interesting. poor visability (unsafe and unrealistic for kids, bikes and traffic). 88 Nothing - the screen concept is not aesthetically pleasing nor the giant randomly placed columns. 89 I enjoy the sculptural approach. Simplicity. 90 Horizontal figures. Vegetation. Nothing. A lot of green. Very practical, good integration of Martin Goodman Trail. Don t like it. Those walls are off-putting and it seems cluttered elsewhere. Straight and fast bike path on Lakeshore. Upward and sky theme. Better than Brown and Storey, but doesn't provide much room for public use. Modern comtemporary approach, just what Toronto needs! Hedgerow blocks, (5 metre stone hedgerow). Combine some of the horizon figures/vegetation with GH3. 13

66 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank Contrast of bright red pathway with natural landscape, 91 Monuments are beautiful! clear/elegant. 92 The structures and the potential for variety as light and weather conditions change (shade, snow, etc). 93 The challenging architectural forms. The use of colour I like the horizon sculpture features because they are large monumental and their scale suits the site. The overall design is too abstract and the Martin Goodman Trail is not included in this design. Not clear. Don t like wall. Pictures not clear, lighting looks dim. It affirms existing landscape and offers the interaction of water, materials and pedestrians. I love the water features, the planting plan, the historic picture panels, it is good to use the rainwater to fill the retaining ponds. The TTC building will be visible and give the Leslie Lakeshore corner an urban feel along with the "green" ponds. Great for skating in winter. Clear layout. Like vegetation, pond amount around facility. Noise reduction element. Most thought put into this one. Not much--it feels and looks like a bank. The attractive "horizontalness" of this concept--substantial forms with simple elements. Monumental and big simple design. Protective of the plants from salt and exhaust pollution and quiet. Needs to be more open to Lakeshore for personal safety. This just looks like a big wall, nothing like the FR design layout. Hedgerow concept neat, but 5 metre high seems intimidating to a pedestrian. What happens with the living support breathing wall in the winter? Otherwise, love the concept. 97 Like structures. Like water aspect. Do not like the "Berlin Wall" effect. Simplicity--but perhaps not enough of a visual barrier-- Use of ponds and the mixture of space usage. Don t like Visual coverage (less concerned about noise) with yearround vegetation. 98 hard to tell. the fact that buildings are so visible. 99 The unique horizontal figures. Prefer concept B. Very green/natural looking. The Red Rocket benches and the green walls. Patchwork of gardens and walkways. Least-> horizontal Water retention pond. Clear seperation between walking Nothing! Brick wall isoaltes view from police, feels like 100 figures. and biking. Berlin Wall. 101 Water and Bridge Choice of plantings, intersting focal points, but couldn t figure out where Martin Goodman went. Fencing/wall looked unnattractive. RESPONDENT ONLY RECORDED RANKING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN PREFERENCES Integration of historical elements (streetcars) into landscape. Transparency/visbility of actual yards. Continuity of berm along Lakeshore. Well though out paths for bikes and pedestrians, nifty use of water. Seperation of bikes from Lakeshore and 5 metre wall. Structures remind me of Chicago's (not ledgible). Focus on green/sustainable. 105 RESPONDENT ONLY RECORDED RANKING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN PREFERENCES 106 Glass structures. Too much paved area at corner. Lots of green. Clever red benches through the meadow. 14

67 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank Not much. Use of water. 5 metre high wall to block sound and view of barn. 108 Unique iceberg things. Most park-like. 109 Thoughful use of stone sculptures. Still feels "green". Would hope existing trees stand the best chance of surviving with this design. 110 Not much. Seems like a complete solution. Not crazy about graphic panels. The red thing, but it would look bad after years of getting dirty. Like it. Concerned about safety of protected walk way. Like how it can be an entrance to spit. 111 Modern and refreshing. Just concerned that the city will not maintain the green wall. 112 Trees. Trees. Protected cycle path. 113 I do not like it. The pond in the intersection--but I worry about maintenance. 5 metre high stone hedgegrow and naturalization along Leslie. 114 Like the open wall grill design. Storm water pond incorporation is a big PLUS +++! Looks like a tunnel. Do not like this at all. 115 The possibility of further collabortaion with the community. Provides a clear narrative for interaction between the public and TTC spaces. 116 Variation in the trail, landscapes along Lakeshore. Best tie in to the TTC project and public domain. 117 Stone/steel structures. Graphic fence panels. Retention ponds. Native plants. None. Provides the greatest insulation from the industrial instruction represented by the yard. 118 Nothing Trees. Martin Goodman Trail Living walls/tunnels. Detail plant lists, etc. Preserves exisiting trees. I like the conservation and integration of water, plants and wall design--it seems very appropriate for the area. RESPONDENT ONLY RECORDED RANKING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN PREFERENCES RESPONDENT ONLY RECORDED RANKING OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN PREFERENCES Nothing. Need more trees to maximize leaf area while preserving Martin Goodman Trail. I like the 'forestry' type look and creation of hills and walls. 15

68 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank Brown + Storey's design had a nice overall feel to it but it didn't strike me and it felt bland. gh3's design is beautiful and I love the five metre hedgerow plan. The main problem for me is for the view on Lakeshore Blvd. I would prefer it if the hedgerow and green lining was higher to block the view the streetcars lie in the 2.5 meter hedgerow plan. Another problem for me is the lack of trees on Lakeshore Blvd. Without the trees, I believe it would not create a green streetscape for the road overall. Many people will just see a grey hedgerow and it would just be bland and boring. Adding tree the the boulevard will fix that. 123 The design was contemporary but I believe it lacked substance, drawing on constructed decoration as focal points. The "horizon figures" and brightly decorated "frieze" wall are distractions from the park surroundings, and placing such obstacles close to the path make them dangerous to cyclists and others. Not enough has been done in my opinion to enhance the trail experience. In general this is a practical and aesthetically pleasing I could not find anything about this design that I felt design which will draw people to see it and to enjoy the enhanced or contributed to the sustainability or habitat, as well as integrating the LRV facility with the area. enjoyment of the area. On the contrary I found this design -The integrity of the trail was left intact lacked focus, imagination and was aesthetically -Filtration ponds are a great idea unappealing. It does not celebrate the open spaces and -Treed areas and other soft landscaping is sustainable and healthy lifestyle prevalent in the neighbourhood. Instead it refreshing blocks out surroundings and imposes a claustrophobic -Open spaces are preserved monolithic "gully" which will block any breezes and which -Bridges are romantic and practical will not be safe at night. The proposed heights of the -Living museum is intriguing monoliths are too high, and despite the gh3 claims -Buffers are thoughtfully designed (acoustic panels, wall otherwise, the monoliths will be attractive for youth to murals). climb, and I feel they will be dangerous in this regard. 124 A design that will activate and energize the neighbourhood and be a welcoming gateway to the trail system leading to the east, west and south. The Fleisher Ridout design is ludicrous. Why incorporate water? If you want to enjoy water, walk to the lake. Water typically involves pumps and these breakdown and are costly. Look around the City. There are numerous water features in parks that are inoperative because of lack of funding to maintain. gh3 - A tunnel of green wall? Now that is safe...! Think! Salt from the roads in winter! Goofy design. 16

69 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank What I do find intriguing is the GH3 idea of a living rock wall. The wall: 1. visually mimics the berm idea (and also has dramatic impact). 2. creates a bit of an absorbing sound barrier from the screeching of the turning streetcars (as well as traffic on Lakeshore). 3. acts as a filter from the find particulate matter and other pollutants that will eventually build up from the grinding of rail wheels on track. 126 Of the 3 proposals, the Fleisher plan appears to be more fitting within the area. If the city pursues the current site, then I feel that the Fleisher plan should be reworked to better use existing elevations to hide the facility (can the existing smoke stacks be removed?). Also, to increase the use of green walls, shrubs or trees to hide the retaining wall (rather than artwork). The less of the site viewable the better. 17

70 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank The Brown and Storey concept was offensive to me. It includes monstrous metal and rock structures that cut into the sky and cut into the blue and green space -- like the Canadian Tire across the road and like the water-treatment stack- these metal mountains are reminders of the imposition of humans and building on our beautiful natural beach land. The Brown-Storey plan doesn't seem to address the need to SEPARATE bike and pedestrian lanes. There is no water feature and no sand... it's the BEACHES!!! Also they haven't included any greening of the ugly TTC grey cement sound barrier. I'm concerned that their metal grate material will rust and look like 80's artjunk in 3-5 years...it won't age well. The designers told me some green stuff will grow on them...from where? Isn't one of these towers surrounded by a water pool? What green stuff..nice vines or weeds? What will 3 or 4 large rusted metal towers look like in 5 years from now? YUCK! These designers are out of touch with nature and the beaches- way too "MOMA" modern looking. I wouldn't want this plan. 0 out of 3. The Fleisher Ridout plan is by far my favourite. I vote for this one = #1. They have included water features- yeah! I love the pond idea with a bridge-- yes!! They seem to have planned for bikes to travel nicely in a large arc from Lakeshore toward Leslie spit-- well done-- finally no more hassles at the corner. I like the idea of brown-earth coloured cement/paving on the corner -- nature! They included green walls too - good stuff. I'm not a fan of the picture-art walls though -- please just stick to nature and green - why make us look at more pictures/billboard-like images as we drive along? And I'd like to see them have more creative ways to hide the TTC station-- more tall trees along there perhaps? The GH3 design is interesting in so far as they have used a lot of green for the walls. They've also tried to hide the LRV maintenance station-great idea. I am concerned with the huge maze-/ fortress-like walls to be on Lakeshore-- I wouldn't feel safe walking or biking through them- and they seem dangerous for late night walkers and blind spots for cyclists vs. pedestrians etc. This is my #2 choice There's only one winner in this muddled "competition" to design the landscaping around the TTC LRV yard. It's Brown & Storey. I guess the first and most critical point has any of the designers rode or walked on the site. I believe that we do not need a high wall on this strip. I vote for the Brown + Storey design. I thoroughly enjoy the GH3 team's designs!! Stunning use of rocks and plants. The other two are kind of boring and mediocre. 18

71 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank I visited your tent on Aug. 8th & was distressed by what I saw: the "hedgerow" (what a misnomer!) in fact looked like a prison wall - it is truly horrible. What were you thinking? Have you seen the fence of the movie studios further down Lakeshore? It is a combination of brick stanchions & metal & is very attractive Brown and Storey--(a very close second but needs a stronger fence or wall to block the ugly visuals of the facility. If need be, I'd go with the red one). Fleisher Ridout--(the weakest--way too much of the facility will be visible--too pedestrian--and not in a good way)! Although the little pool thing is kinda nice. These designs would work better further down Leslie by the entrance to the Spit. I did not like the idea of having a 5 m stone wall running along Lakeshore that would make me feel unsafe to be behind that wall alone in the early morning while jogging. GH3 --(but would be better enhanced if combined with elements from Brown and Storey). 19

72 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank My least favourite was the Brown and Storey as I am not sure what to make of the obelisk like structures they are proposing. It seems like too much "modernism" for this area which is already being compromised by tasteless big box stores. I MUCH prefer the Fleisher Ridout design. It seems to be the best fit with the natural character of the area. I also found the presenters at the tent event (who I suspect were the principals of the company) much more approachable and open to suggestions than the competition. They I also suggested to the GH3 people that the top of their seemed to be very engaged in the project as if they truly proposed wall should be accessable to the public, rather loved doing it. I really liked their idea of a pond with a than making it from unclimbable material as they were bridge crossing it. Their design also seemed to be the best planning. The theory being that allowing people is a better at preserving and enhancing the Martin Goodman trail idea than trying to keep them out. I also suggested that with the bridge being a centrepiece of that. Looking at the wall be designed more creatively to look like a their proposed pictures of streetcars on the fence, I medieval castle or the great wall of China. The waterworks suggested that they work with the designers of the actual at Neville Park is an example of a fairly modern structure yard and explore the possibility of a storage track for the intentionally designed to look very old and attractive. Their PCC and other functioning historic streetcars within view design would benefit greatly if they tried something similar but out of reach of the public. This would prevent to make it look much older than the present. vandalism and still allow display of more than just pictures and on-functioning shells as part of their proposed streetcar museum. The idea was very positively received by the Fleisher Ridout people. 20

73 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGNCOMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT COMPENDIUM OF TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION FEEDBACK Question 1: What do you like most about the Brown + Question 2: What do you like most about the Fleisher # Question 3: What do you like most about the gh3 design? Storey design? Ridout design? Rank While I generally like the design concept and enjoy the play on rest and motion, I fail to see how such a high end design could be built w/a mere $750,000. The connection to the Martin Goodman Trail (MGT) at the corner is weak and not direct: bypassing the vertical structures could be difficult and dangerous. Site lines need to be maintained. The north/south connection needs to accommodate a wide variety of users and should be shown in the same dimension (width) as the MGT. The trail system should be easily accessible and wayfinding should not be an issue. The patchwork concept is very effective and could be a powerful graphic display along the fast moving corridors of the Lakeshore and Leslie Street. The Horizon Figures are interesting features and could act as landmark features that evolve over time (similar to the Elevated Wetlands along the DVP). Winter use is an important consideration, therefore pedestrian scale lighting must be incorporated into the design. Pathways need to be wider and maintained w/out the use of salt. While I generally like the design concept and enjoy the green connection, I fail to see how such a this design could be built w/a mere $750,000. Intersection - This is the key intersection for the community. More attention needs to paid to this w/a landmark gesture. Avoid institutional-like walls. Sound retention is importation to the community but it must look good too. The planted berms are a good way to lessen the impact of the large walls. The green wall is very effective and appealing. The acoustical wall does not seem so overpowering, even at 5m height when combined w/the green wall and berms. Do not pay homage to the TTC. The relationship to the art panels should be to the history of the community, either natural or social, which should not include the TTC. Again sound retention is an important consideration. The openness of the panels fails to address this. Graphic panel fence - No way! This is not what the community expressed during public consultation. A greener solution is required. This is my preferred option of the three concepts shown, however, I fail to see how such an enriched design could be built w/a mere $750,000. A very powerful graphic. Works well to mask the high speed and volumes of traffic along the Lakeshore. Will it meet CEPTED safety? More and larger respite areas would allow for greater use of the park rather than as a thoroughfare for pedestrian traffic. The Stone Hedgerow is a very graphic feature. An iconic feature that evolves w/time especially w/the addition of plant material. 21

74 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT Appendix A Copy of Landscape Design Competition Question Card

75

76

77 TTC ASHBRIDGES BAY MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITY LANDSCAPE DESIGN COMPETITION AUGUST 8 AND 10, 2010 PUBLIC TENT EVENTS SUMMARY REPORT Appendix B Public Notification Materials for Tent Events

78 Ashbridges Bay TTC Facility Landscape Design Competition Design Panels Available for Viewing and Comment August 8 and August 10, 2010 The Toronto Transit Commission is hosting two Tent Events to present the entries from the Ashbridges Bay Landscape Design Competition. Leading urban and landscape design firms, Brown and Storey, Fleisher Ridout Partnership and GH3, will be presenting their creative concepts. Each firms proven track record for innovative and environmental design has been put to the test in designing the landscape perimeter of the new TTC, Ashbridges Bay Maintenance and Storage Facility. The Facility will support the 204 new low-floor, streetcars arriving in Toronto, beginning in Representatives from each firm will be on hand to explain their design concepts and answer questions on functionality and integration of the existing Leslie Street greening initiatives. These events provide a great opportunity for trail users, residents and businesses to view and comment on the transformation of this intersection. An independent jury of five, lead by the City of Toronto s Urban Design Team, will be reviewing community input and evaluating each submission. Pedestrians, cyclists and all users of the Martin Goodman Trail are encouraged to participate. Have your say on everything from public art to steetscaping and plantings, at this exciting event. Look for the large white tent at these locations; August 8, :00 am 4:00 pm South East corner of Leslie and Lakeshore (Accessible along the Martin Goodman Trail) August 10, :00 pm 8:00 pm Ashbridges Bay Park (South East Corner of Coxwell and Lakeshore) Further details on the event, comment forms and the submissions from each of the firms are available on our project website at: Comments will be received until August 23, Contact Us: Lito Romano, TTC Community Liaison 5160 Yonge Street, 13th Floor Toronto, ON M2N 6L9 Tel: Fax: lito.romano@ttc.ca Under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act and the Environmental Assessment Act, unless otherwise stated in the submission, any personal information such as name, address, telephone number and property location included in a submission will become part of the public record for this matter and will be released if requested to any person.

79 念 參 年 多倫多公車局將於 Ashbridges Bay 舉辦兩次 帳篷活動, 展示景觀設計參賽的作品 在市區及景觀設計方面經驗豐富的公司, 包括 Brown and Storey, GH3 及 Fleisher Ridout, 屆時會各自介紹位於 Lakeshore Blvd 一段 Leslie Street 的新概念設計 上述公司的代表會在現場就新設計概念的特色及融合目前 Leslie Street 綠化計劃兩方面進行講解及回答問題 上述活動讓住戶 商戶及使用該路段人士有機會評賞這個道路交界的改建設計, 並提出意見 由多倫多市政府市區設計組領導的一個獨立五人評判團會審議社區人士的意見及評審 每份意見書 當局鼓勵行人 騎腳踏車及所有使用 Martin Goodman Trail 的人士踴躍出席上述活動, 並於席間提出各種意見, 無論是有關大眾藝術 街上景觀設計, 以至種植樹木等意見均無任 歡迎 活動在下列地點的大型白色帳篷內舉行 : 2010 年 8 月 8 日上午 11 時至下午 4 時 Leslie 及 Lakeshore 的東南角可沿 Martin Goodman Trail 直達 2010 年 8 月 10 日下午 4 時至 8 時 Ashbridges Bay Park Coxwell 及 Lakeshore 的東南角 多倫多公車局新的 Ashbridges Bay 維修及停放廠房的周邊設計強調創新及環保, 上述三家深具經驗的設計公司均需通過嚴格考驗, 符合這兩項原則 廠房於 2013 年起啟用, 用來停放 204 輛運抵多倫多的新低底板街車 有關活動 意見陳述表及上述每家公司的參賽設計建議書可見於我們的工程網站, 網址是 與我們聯絡的方式 : Lito Romano, TTC Community Liaison 5160 Yonge Street, 13th Floor Toronto, ON M2N 6L9 電話 : 傳真 : 電郵 : lito.romano@ttc.ca 根據自由取得資訊暨私隱條例及環境評估條例, 除非在意見陳述書內事先註明, 否則在與本事項有關的意見陳述書內的任何姓名 地址 電話號碼及物業所在地點均會成為公共紀錄的一部份, 並會在有人申請有關資訊時向該名人士發放

80