Action Items

Transcription

1

2 Action Items

3

4

5

6

7 Act 247 Reviews

8 Subdivision & Land Development

9 Act 247 Reviews of Proposed Development during January 2016 Symbols 9 Residential Lots/Units Non-Residential Square Feet Other D D 1-10,000 10, , ,001-1,200,000 Mixed Use Not Consistent with Livable Landscapes2 Note: Excludes lot line revisions, lot consolidations, second reviews, sketch plans, and surface parking, UNLESS those reviews cited unique or significant community impacts. 4 # PLAN # PLAN TITLE 1 LD Roberts Automall 2 LD Swedesford Plaza 3 LD Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion 4 LD Dollar General Cochranville, PA 5 LD Penn Medicine Chester County Hosp 6 LD CVS/Pharmacy 7 LD Main Avenue LLC SD Megill Homes Huntrise Lane 9 SD Benjamin Goldfield 10 SD Sunshine Management Subdivision Livable Landscapes2 Growth Areas Urban Suburban Suburban Center Rural Resource Areas Agricultural Rural Rural Center Miles

10 Subdivision and Land Development Applications January 2016 Chester County Planning Commission Total all land use types REVIEWS LOTS/UNITS January year-to-date 2015 total ,000 2,000 3,000 2,539 RESIDENTIAL REVIEWS Land Use LOTS/UNITS Single family January year-to-date 2015 total Apartment January year-to-date 2015 total Townhome January year-to-date 2015 total Twin January year-to-date ,000 1, total 19 Mixed-use REVIEWS 0 0 January year-to-date Mobile home January year-to-date 2015 total total 0 Agriculture January year-to-date 2 Unofficial sketch plans REVIEWS total January year-to-date 2015 total NON-RESIDENTIAL Structural square footage 0 January year-to-date 2015 total 22,053 22,053 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 2,755,233 NON-RESIDENTIAL Commercial January year-to-date 2015 total Industrial January year-to-date 2015 total Institutional January year-to-date 2015 total

11 Subdivision and Land Development Reviews 1/1/2016 to 1/31/2016 Review Municipality Date Plan # Title Acreage Land Use Lots/Units Non-Res. Sq. Footage Structure Use Non-Res. Bldgs. Roads (L. Feet) Landscapes2 (Yes, No, N/R) Easttown Township 1/15/2016 LD Main Avenue LLC 0.2 Sfr Twn 3 Residential Sfr Residential Twn Yes Kennett Township 1/15/2016 LD Nursery Overflow Parking Facility Com 1 Com Parking Lot/Garage Yes Kennett Township 1/20/2016 SD Michael Pia Sfr Agr 2 Residential Sfr Agr Open Space Conservation Yes New London Township 1/27/2016 SD Joseph Brackin Sfr Agr 2 Residential Sfr Agr Farm/Pasture Land Yes Sadsbury Township 1/21/2016 LD Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion 5.47 Com 1 21,667 Com Addition to Existing 1 Yes South Coventry Township 1/21/2016 LD Conestoga Stone 5.27 Com 1 Com Retail Yes Thornbury Township 1/27/2016 SD Megill Homes Huntrise Lane Sfr 7 Residential 370 Yes Sfr Tredyffrin Township 1/15/2016 LD CVS/Pharmacy 1.73 Com 1 12,900 Com 1 Yes Retail Tredyffrin Township 1/22/2016 LD Swedesford Plaza Com 1 5,067 Com 1 Yes Retail West Fallowfield Township 1/27/2016 LD Dollar General Com 1 9,100 Com 1 Yes Cochranville, PA Retail West Goshen Township 1/6/2016 LD Penn Medicine Chester County Hosp 1.30 Ins 1 229,179 Ins Parking Lot/Garage 1 Yes West Vincent Township 1/13/2016 SD Laymen's Home Missionary Movement Sfr 2 Residential Sfr Yes January 2, 2016 Page 1 of 3

12 Review Municipality Date Plan # Title Acreage Land Use Lots/Units Non-Res. Sq. Footage Structure Use Non-Res. Bldgs. Roads (L. Feet) Landscapes2 (Yes, No, N/R) West Vincent Township 1/27/2016 SD Benjamin Goldfield 6.00 Sfr 2 Residential Yes Sfr West Whiteland Township 1/7/2016 SD Sunshine Management 7.52 Sfr 7 Residential Yes Subdivision Sfr West Whiteland Township 1/21/2016 LD Roberts Automall 3.04 Com 1 4,140 Com Addition to Existing 1 Yes Willistown Township 1/12/2016 SD The Delchester Group Inc Sfr 3 Residential Sfr N/R Grand Totals of Subdivision and Land Development Reviews 16 Reviews Acres 36 Lots/Units 22,053 Non-Res. Sq. Feet Non-Res. Linear Bldgs. Feet Roadway There are 15 plans consistent, 0 plans inconsistent, and 1 plans with no relevance to Landscapes2. January 2, 2016 Page 2 of 3

13 Unofficial Sketch Plan Evaluations 1/1/2016 to 1/31/2016 Municipality Review Date Plan # Title Acreage Land Use Lots/Units Non-Res. Sq. Footage Structure Use Non-Res. Bldgs. Roads Landscapes2 (L. Feet) (Yes, No, N/R) No Unofficial Sketch Plan Evaluations were conducted during this timeframe. January 2, 2016 Page 3 of 3

14 Subdivision & Land Development Letters

15 John R. Weller, AICP, Director of Planning & Zoning West Whiteland Township 101 Commerce Drive Exton, PA January 21, 2016 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Roberts Automall # LD West Whiteland Township Dear Mr. Weller: A preliminary/final land development plan entitled "Roberts Automall", prepared by T&M Associates, and dated December 23, 2015, was received by this office on December 30, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location the north side of West Lincoln Highway (Route 30), west of North Whitford Road Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Suburban Landscape Watersheds Designation - Valley Creek (West) subbasin of the Brandywine Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of a 4,140 square foot addition to the existing auto sales and service facility. No new sewage disposal or water supply is proposed by the current plan submission. The project site is located in the O/C Office/Commercial zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all West Whiteland Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this land development plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

16 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Roberts Automall # LD West Whiteland Township WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Valley Creek (West) subbasin of the Brandywine Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Brandywine Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and protect vegetated riparian corridors. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Brandywine Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link. PRIMARY ISSUES: 3. The County Planning Commission previously reviewed a subdivision and land development plan submission which included UPI# as part of the project site. CCPC# SD and LD , BT Exton, LP Carriage Home Cluster Development, dated March 20, 2015, addressed the construction of 6 townhouse units and 4,335 linear feet of public roadway, including the construction of the proposed Waterloo Boulevard Extension from North Whitford Road to Campbell Boulevard, on a 53.3 acre site (UPI# , , , , , ), along with three separate lot line revisions required for the proposed Waterloo Boulevard Extension

17 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Roberts Automall # LD West Whiteland Township right-of-way, which included the conveyance of a 4,13 square foot portion of UPI# to UPI# While a plan note on the current plan submission identifies the Township granted final plan approval for this submission on August 12, 2015, the County Planning Commission has no record that this plan has been recorded with the County Recorder of Deeds office. The Township Engineer should verify that the proposed parcel boundary revision and all applicable details of the Waterloo Boulevard Extension depicted on the approved BT Exton, LP plan, including the two driveway entrances for the Roberts Automall site on the Waterloo Boulevard Extension, are accurately depicted on the current plan submission. 4. Sheet 2 of the plan identifies that the project site is situated in a carbonate geology area, in which the presence or potential may exist for formation and/or expansion of solution channels, sinkholes and other karst features. These features can present risk of collapse and groundwater contamination that often can be overcome and avoided with careful stormwater management design. The location, type, and design of stormwater facilities and best management practices (BMPs) should be based on a site evaluation conducted by a qualified licensed professional that ascertains the conditions relevant to formation of karst features, and the PA BMP Manual or other design guidance acceptable to the Municipal Engineer. 5. The applicant is requesting five waivers from the provisions of the Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, and one waiver from the stormwater management standards in Section of the Township Code. Waiver requests should only be considered following the determination that the proposed project either meets the purpose of these requirements or does not create the impacts that these provisions are intended to manage. 6. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. 7. The proposed activity is located within a watershed for which one or more Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollutant load reduction requirements have been established by PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the TMDL report(s) for this watershed to determine if any requirements are applicable to this location, and if so, ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the relevant pollutant loading to the water body, and that the proposed activity achieves any applicable pollutant load reductions that may be required by municipal or state regulations, to the extent practicable. Information regarding TMDLs for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTES:. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office.

18 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Roberts Automall # LD West Whiteland Township This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of West Whiteland Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: Park Lane II, LP T&M Associates Roberts Chevrolet

19 January 22, 2016 Matt Baumann, Assistant Manager Tredyffrin Township 1100 DuPortail Road Berwyn, PA Re: Final Land Development - Swedesford Plaza # LD Tredyffrin Township Dear Mr. Baumann: A final land development plan entitled "Swedesford Plaza", prepared by ECHO Real Estate Services Company, and dated December 15, 2015, was received by this office on January 4, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location the southwest corner of Swedesford Road and Contention Lane Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Suburban Landscape Watersheds Designation (East) Valley Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of a 5,067 square foot retail building, 36 additional parking spaces, and the reconfiguration of the existing driveway entrance on Contention Lane. The project site, which is served by public water and public sewer, is located in the C-2 Commercial zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Tredyffrin Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Suburban Landscape is to promote new development to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

20 Page: 2 Re: Final Land Development - Swedesford Plaza # LD Tredyffrin Township WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the (East) Valley Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the (East) Valley Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and protect/enhance historic, cultural and recreational resources. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the (East) Valley Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link. PRIMARY ISSUES: 3. We recommend that the applicant provide a direct sidewalk connection from the proposed crosswalk on the Contention Lane driveway entrance to the existing shopping center building to the immediate south of the project site.

21 Page: 3 Re: Final Land Development - Swedesford Plaza # LD Tredyffrin Township 4. In February 2011, the Valley Creek Watershed Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within the (East) Valley Creek watershed must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved (East) Valley Creek Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the (East) Valley Creek Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance. 5. The proposed project is located in an area designated by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as a Special Protection Watershed. Special Protection Watersheds are important because Chester County s High Quality and Exceptional Value Watersheds may be especially sensitive to degradation and pollution that could result from development. The DEP or the municipality may impose stricter limitations on proposed wastewater and stormwater discharges in these watersheds, and special care should be exercised in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of stormwater control facilities in these areas to prevent degradation of the waters of the Commonwealth. 6. The site is underlain by carbonate geology in which the presence or potential may exist for formation and/or expansion of solution channels, sinkholes and other karst features. These features can present risk of collapse and groundwater contamination that often can be overcome and avoided with careful stormwater management design. The location, type, and design of stormwater facilities and best management practices (BMPs) should be based on a site evaluation conducted by a qualified licensed professional that ascertains the conditions relevant to formation of karst features, and the PA BMP Manual or other design guidance acceptable to the Municipal Engineer. 7. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link.. The proposed activity is located within a watershed for which one or more Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollutant load reduction requirements have been established by PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the TMDL report(s) for this watershed to determine if any requirements are applicable to this location, and if so, ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the relevant pollutant loading to the water body, and that the proposed activity achieves any applicable pollutant load reductions that may be required by municipal or state regulations, to the extent practicable. Information regarding TMDLs for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link.

22 Page: 4 Re: Final Land Development - Swedesford Plaza # LD Tredyffrin Township ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 9. The December 9, 2015 cover sheet and the Setbacks Table on Sheet C201 both identify that the Township Zoning Hearing Board granted a variance from the maximum impervious coverage requirements of the Township Zoning Ordinance for this project. Prior to granting final plan approval, the Township should verify that the plan conforms to the decision issued by the Township Zoning Hearing Board, and any conditions of approval issued by the Board should be indicated on the approved plan. 10. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Tredyffrin Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: ECHO Swedesford Associates, L.P. ECHO Real Estate Services Company

23 January 21, 2016 Linda Shank, Secretary Sadsbury Township 2920 Lincoln Highway, PO Box 261 Sadsburyville, PA Re: Preliminary Land Development - Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion # LD Sadsbury Township Dear Ms. Shank: A preliminary land development plan entitled "Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion", prepared by Duffield Assocates Inc. and dated January 4, 2016, was received by this office on January 7, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - south side of State Route 30 Bypass, west of Independence Way Site Acreage acres UPI D Landscapes2 Designation - Suburban Landscape Watersheds Designation - Buck Run subbasin of the Brandywine Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of a 21,667 square foot commercial building addition and 59 additional parking spaces. The site is served by public water and sewer facilities and is located in the I-1 Light Industrial zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Sadsbury Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Suburban Landscape is to promote new development to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

24 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion # LD Sadsbury Township density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. Additionally, Landscapes2 supports infill development and redevelopment efforts in the Suburban Landscape based upon infrastructure capacity and environmental constraints. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Landscape. WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Brandywine Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Brandywine Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and protect vegetated riparian corridors. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Brandywine Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link.

25 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion # LD Sadsbury Township PRIMARY ISSUES: The Township s emergency service providers should be requested to review the plan to ensure that safe access and egress is provided for this site. The Township Fire Marshal should verify the design and location of all proposed fire-protection facilities. The plan shows that 165 parking spaces are required and 134 spaces are to be provided, with 32 spaces held in reserve (shown in light grey on the plan, located to the west of the building expansion). We agree that holding unnecessary parking spaces in reserve is appropriate because it can help to reduce initial construction costs, limit the creation of impervious surfaces, and increase opportunities for landscaping. We suggest that the applicant and the Township consider whether even more spaces can be similarly reserved, such as some of the parallel parking spaces to the north of the building. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. The applicant should verify that the proposed land development plan is consistent with all Federal Aviation Administration requirements, particularly related to lighting. The Township Engineer should verify that the design and capacity of the proposed stormwater facilities conforms to ordinance provisions. The Township should verify that the proposed landscaping plan conforms to Township Ordinance landscape and screening requirements. The Township should ensure that this proposal conforms to the requirements of the Chester County Department of Emergency Services relating to the provision of emergency radio in-building amplifying equipment, to ensure the continuity of reliable emergency radio communications using the Chester County radio system. The applicant should contact the County Department of Emergency Services Technical Division at for more information on this issue.

26 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Aerzen U.S.A. Expansion # LD Sadsbury Township ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE: 12. A minimum of four copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Sadsbury Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, cc: Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner Aerzen USA Corp Duffield Assocates Inc County Department of Emergency Services Technical Division

27 January 27, 2016 Gina M. Wheeler, Manager/Secretary West Fallowfield Township 3095 Limestone Road, Suite 1 Cochranville, PA Re: Preliminary Land Development - Dollar General - Cochranville, PA # LD West Fallowfield Township Dear Ms. Wheeler: A preliminary land development plan entitled "Dollar General - Cochranville, PA", prepared by Hurley & Stewart, LLC and dated December 20, 2015, was received by this office on January, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - east side of Cochran Street, west side of Route 41 Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Rural Center Landscape Watersheds Designation - Knight Run subbasin of the Octoraro Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of a 9,100 square foot commercial building and 30 parking spaces. The site will be served by on-site water and on-site sewer facilities and is located in the C- Commercial zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all West Fallowfield Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Rural Center Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Rural Center Landscape is to preserve ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

28 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Dollar General - Cochranville, PA # LD West Fallowfield Township the open, rural character of Chester County, enhance villages within their historic settings, and accommodate appropriate development in rural centers. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Rural Center Landscape. WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Octoraro Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Octoraro Creek watershed include: implement comprehensive stormwater management, restore water quality of impaired streams, and protect first order streams. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Octoraro Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link.

29 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Dollar General - Cochranville, PA # LD West Fallowfield Township PRIMARY ISSUES: The Township should verify that the submission meets all ordinance requirements related to the location, size and lighting of signs. The Township Fire Marshal should verify the design and location of all proposed fire-protection facilities. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. The Township engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance. The Township should verify that the proposed landscaping plan conforms to Township Ordinance landscape and screening requirements. We also suggest that the applicant provide elevations of the building's western side, which will be visible from Cochran Street, and describe its aesthetic character. This is also important because the western portion of the site will contain the trash enclosure. We suggest that similar exterior finishes be used on the building s western side, and the applicant should consider additional landscaping to screen views from the west. The proposed activity is located within a watershed for which one or more Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollutant load reduction requirements have been established by PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the TMDL report(s) for this watershed to determine if any requirements are applicable to this location, and if so, ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the relevant pollutant loading to the water body, and that the proposed activity achieves any applicable pollutant load reductions that may be required by municipal or state regulations, to the extent practicable. Information regarding TMDLs for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. 10. We recommend that the applicant consider the need for oil/water separators in the stormwater management system. This would reduce the risk of spilled petroleum products from entering the stormwater system and possible contamination of the watershed. 11. We acknowledge that the plan will require a PennDOT Highway Occupancy Permit, as noted on Sheet 1.

30 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Dollar General - Cochranville, PA # LD West Fallowfield Township We commend the applicant for providing a bike rack. However, the proposed bike rack is in a remote location in relation to the building s entrance, and the bike rack should be moved to a place where it may be more easily seen and used. The Township should verify that the design and location of any proposed outdoor lighting conforms to Township ordinance requirements. The illumination should be directed inward from the periphery of the site and be oriented to reduce glare and visual impact on the adjoining roadways and land uses. The Township should ensure that this proposal conforms to the requirements of the Chester County Department of Emergency Services relating to the provision of emergency radio inbuilding amplifying equipment, to ensure the continuity of reliable emergency radio communications using the Chester County radio system. The applicant should contact the County Department of Emergency Services Technical Division at for more information on this issue. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE: 15. A minimum of five copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds, the Assessment Office, and the Health Department. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of West Fallowfield Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, cc: Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner Cochranville DG, LLC CG Buchalter LLC Hurley & Stewart, LLC County Department of Emergency Services Technical Division Matthew Miele, PennDOT District Permits Manager Francis J. Hanney, PennDOT Chester County Health Department

31 Casey LaLonde, Manager West Goshen Township 1025 Paoli Pike West Chester, PA 1930 January 6, 2016 Re: Final Land Development - Penn Medicine Chester County Hospital # LD West Goshen Township Dear Mr. LaLonde: A final land development plan entitled "Penn Medicine Chester County Hospital", prepared by SSM Group Inc., and dated December 4, 2015, was received by this office on December 10, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - the west side of East Marshall Street, and the south side of Goshen Road Site Acreage acres UPI A-46-E Landscapes2 Designation - Urban Landscape Watersheds Designation - Taylor Run subbasin of the Brandywine Creek watershed, and the Goose Creek subbasin of the Chester Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of a four-story 229,179 square foot parking garage. The Parking Space Requirement Summary on the cover sheet identifies that 923 additional parking spaces will be provided (701 parking garage spaces and 222 surface parking spaces). The project site, which is served by public water and public sewer, is located in the MSD Medical Services zoning district. While a portion of the hospital site is situated in West Chester Borough, all proposed development activity depicted in the current plan submission will be situated in West Goshen Township. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all West Goshen Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this land development plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Urban Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Urban Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

32 Page: 2 Re: Final Land Development - Penn Medicine Chester County Hospital # LD West Goshen Township BACKGROUND: 2. The Chester County Planning Commission previously reviewed a land development proposal for the Chester County Hospital site, which addressed the construction of a 93,500 square foot addition to the existing hospital building (CCPC# LD , dated March 10, 2011). According to our records, this prior land development submission was approved by West Chester Borough on April 20, 2011 and (initially) approved by West Goshen Township on May 11, PRIMARY ISSUES: 3. The applicant should clearly identify all alternate parking measures that will be available to hospital visitors and staff, along with all traffic control measures that are required during the construction of the proposed garage, which is located within the center of the parking area to the north of the hospital complex. 4. While we acknowledge that sidewalks and crosswalks areas are incorporated into the design of the parking garage project, we recommend that the applicant and Township determine if any additional pedestrian features are required in the hospital s existing parking areas in order to provide safe pedestrian access to the hospital itself. The applicant and Township should refer to the pedestrian facilities design element in the County Planning Commission s 2015 Multimodal Circulation Handbook in its review of this land development plan, which is available online at:

33 Page: 3 Re: Final Land Development - Penn Medicine Chester County Hospital # LD West Goshen Township 5. The Parking Space Requirement Summary on the cover sheet indicates that the hospital will be providing 1,496 parking spaces, which is more than twice the number of parking spaces required for all existing facilities in both West Goshen Township and West Chester Borough (630). The applicant should identify the need for these additional spaces, such as future expansion projects. 6. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance. 7. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link.. The proposed activity is located within a watershed for which one or more Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollutant load reduction requirements have been established by PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the TMDL report(s) for this watershed to determine if any requirements are applicable to this location, and if so, ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the relevant pollutant loading to the water body, and that the proposed activity achieves any applicable pollutant load reductions that may be required by municipal or state regulations, to the extent practicable. Information regarding TMDLs for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 9. The applicant should contact the office of the Chester County Conservation District (CCCD) for information and clarification on erosion control measures. The provisions of the Commonwealth Erosion Control Regulations may apply to the project and may require an Earth Disturbance Permit or a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for discharge of stormwater from construction activities. 10. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office.

34 Page: 4 Re: Final Land Development - Penn Medicine Chester County Hospital # LD West Goshen Township This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of West Goshen Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: Chester County Hospital University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Medicine SSM Group Inc. Chester County Conservation District Michael Perrone, Zoning Officer, West Chester Borough

35 January 15, 2016 Matt Baumann, Assistant Manager Tredyffrin Township 1100 DuPortail Road Berwyn, PA Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - CVS/Pharmacy # LD Tredyffrin Township Dear Mr. Baumann: A preliminary/final land development plan entitled "CVS/Pharmacy", prepared by Bohler Engineering, and dated December 10, 2015, was received by this office on December 21, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location the northwest corner of Lancaster Avenue (Route 30) and Old Eagle School Road Site Acreage acres UPI G-11 Landscapes2 Designation Suburban Center Landscape Watersheds Designation - Little Darby Creek subbasin of the Darby Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of a 12,900 square foot pharmacy building with drive-through service and 55 parking spaces. The existing building on the site will be removed. The existing sidewalks will be upgraded, and crosswalk areas will be provided. The project site, which is served by public water and public sewer, is located in the C-1 Commercial zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed, particularly the site design issues discussed in comments #3 through #5, and all Tredyffrin Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this land development plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Center Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of this Landscape is to promote new development to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

36 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - CVS/Pharmacy # LD Tredyffrin Township density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. Additionally, Landscapes2 supports infill development and redevelopment efforts in the Suburban Center Landscape designations based upon infrastructure capacity and environmental constraints. While the proposed land development is generally consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Center Landscape, greater consistency could be achieved if the design changes outlined in comments #3 through #5 are incorporated into the overall site design. WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Little Darby Creek subbasin of the Darby Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Darby Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and increase public access to and recreational use of streams. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Darby Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link.

37 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - CVS/Pharmacy # LD Tredyffrin Township PRIMARY ISSUES: 3. We recommend that the applicant and Township consider a revised site design, in which the proposed building would be situated closer to Lancaster Avenue with parking provided to the side and rear of the building (we note the existing building on this site and the buildings to the immediate east of the project site are located next to Lancaster Avenue). A revised building location could also facilitate an improved on-site circulation design, which is discussed further in comment #5, along with eliminating the need for a portion of the drive-through window egress to be constructed on the adjoining parcel. 4. The Site Design Requirements table on Sheet 3 indicates the applicant is requesting 12 more parking spaces than required by the Township zoning ordinance. We recommend that the applicant and Township evaluate the actual anticipated parking demand for the facility, and determine whether the number of proposed parking spaces will be necessary. If fewer spaces are required, we recommend that the extra spaces could be landscaped and held in reserve instead of being paved. The reserve spaces could be installed in the future if it becomes evident that they are actually needed. Reserving parking spaces in this manner can help reduce initial construction costs, limit the creation of impervious surfaces, and increase opportunities for landscaping. 5. The Township should carefully examine the design of the proposed on-site circulation plan, particularly pertaining to access to the drive-through area and outdoor trash enclosures, both of which are located to the rear of building. Due to the immediate proximity of the trash enclosures to the drive-through window, trash removal should not be scheduled during drive-through hours of operation. 6. The site plan indicates that a portion of the drive-through window egress will be located within an easement area on UPI# 43-11G-10. The details of this easement should be incorporated into the deeds of both lots. The plan also indicates the applicant proposes minor modifications to the parking area on UPI# 43-11G-10, which appear to be required in part because of the proposed access easement. 7. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance.. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link.

38 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - CVS/Pharmacy # LD Tredyffrin Township ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 9. The applicant should contact the office of the Chester County Conservation District (CCCD) for information and clarification on erosion control measures. The provisions of the Commonwealth Erosion Control Regulations may apply to the project and may require an Earth Disturbance Permit or a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for discharge of stormwater from construction activities. 10. A Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) permit is required for new or revised access and should be identified on the final plan as required by Section 50(6) of the Municipalities Planning Code. 11. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Tredyffrin Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: Pennsylvania CVS Pharmacy, LLC Summit Realty Advisors, LLC Bohler Engineering Matthew Miele, District Permits Manager, PennDOT Francis J. Hanney, P.E., PennDOT Chester County Conservation District

39 January 15, 2016 Lisa M. Moore, Secretary/Manager Kennett Township 01 Burrows Run Road Chadds Ford, PA Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Nursery Overflow Parking Facility-Longwood Gardens # LD Kennett Township Dear Ms. Moore: A preliminary/final land development plan entitled "Nursery Overflow Parking Facility-Longwood Gardens", prepared by Pennoni Associates, Inc. and dated October 9, 2015, was received by this office on December 23, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - south side of Baltimore Pike (State Route 1), east of Greenwood Road Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Rural Landscape Watersheds Designation - East Branch Red Clay Creek subbasin of the Red Clay Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of 1,173 overflow parking spaces to serve Longwood Gardens. No new on-site water and sewer facilities are proposed; the site is located in the R-2 Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Kennett Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The site is located within the Rural Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Rural Landscape is to preserve the open, rural character of Chester County, enhance villages within their historic settings, and accommodate ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

40 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Nursery Overflow Parking Facility-Longwood Gardens # LD Kennett Township appropriate developments in rural centers. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Rural Landscape. WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Red Clay Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Red Clay Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and protect vegetated riparian corridors These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Red Clay Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link.

41 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Nursery Overflow Parking Facility-Longwood Gardens # LD Kennett Township PRIMARY ISSUES: The Township s emergency service providers should be requested to review the plan to ensure that safe ingress and egress are provided for this site. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. The Township Engineer should verify that the design and capacity of the proposed stormwater facilities conforms to ordinance provisions. The Township and the applicant should discuss how visitors to Longwood Gardens will travel to and from the Gardens, and whether there will be pedestrian opportunities for this access. We recommend that the applicant consider the need for oil/water separators in the stormwater management system. This would reduce the risk of spilled petroleum products from entering the stormwater system and possible contamination of the watershed. 9. The Township should verify that the design and location of any proposed outdoor lighting conforms to Township ordinance requirements. The illumination should be directed inward from the periphery of the site and be oriented to reduce glare and visual impact on the adjoining roadways and land uses. 10. The 2004 Road Functional Classification Technical Memorandum by the Chester County Planning Commission classifies Baltimore Pike (State Route 1) as an expressway. The memorandum recommends a 150 to 300 foot-wide right-of-way for expressways to accommodate future road improvement. We recommend that the applicant contact PennDOT to determine the appropriate right-of-way for this section of Baltimore Pike. 11. The site is located within an agricultural security area adopted by the Township in accordance with the Agricultural Security Area Act (Act 43). Adoption of an agricultural security area is a public policy statement for the preservation of agriculture. The Township should consider how designation of agricultural security areas relates to its current zoning ordinance.

42 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - Nursery Overflow Parking Facility-Longwood Gardens # LD Kennett Township 12. The plan indicates that a variance has been requested by the applicant, relating to parking lot design. The Township should not grant final plan approval prior to the Zoning Hearing Board granting any variance requests. The final plan should accurately note the Zoning Hearing Board s decision, including any conditions of approval issued by the Board. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE: 13. A minimum of four copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Kennett Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner cc: Chester County Health Department Matthew Miele, PennDOT District Permits Manager Francis J. Hanney, PennDOT

43 Mildred W. Donnell, Secretary South Coventry Township, Board of Supervisors 1371 New Philadelphia Road Pottstown, PA Re: Preliminary Land Development - Conestoga Stone # LD South Coventry Township Dear Ms. Donnell: January 21, 2016 A preliminary land development plan entitled "Conestoga Stone", prepared by Edward B. Walsh and Associates, Inc. and dated August 4, 2015, was received by this office on December 23, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - on the northwest corner of Ridge Road (State Route 23) and New Philadelphia Road Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Rural Center Landscape Watersheds Designation - French Creek subbasin of the French Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of 37 parking spaces to serve a proposed commercial retail facility; the structure is currently a warehouse and office. No changes to the site s on-site water and sewer facilities are proposed. The site is located in the MU - Mixed Use zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all South Coventry Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The site is located within the Rural Center Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Rural Center Landscape is to preserve the open, rural character of Chester County, enhance villages within their historic settings, and ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

44 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Conestoga Stone # LD South Coventry Township accommodate appropriate development in rural centers. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Rural Center Landscape. WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the French Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the French Creek watershed include: implement comprehensive stormwater management, protect water quality from nonpoint source pollutants, and protect vegetated riparian corridors These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the French Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link.

45 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Conestoga Stone # LD South Coventry Township PRIMARY ISSUES: The plan shows 37 parking spaces, as required by the Township Zoning Ordinance. We suggest that the applicant and the Township evaluate the actual anticipated parking demand for this facility, and determine whether all the proposed parking spaces will be necessary. If fewer spaces are required, we suggest that the extra spaces could be landscaped and held in reserve instead of being paved. The reserve spaces could be installed in the future if it becomes evident that they are actually needed. Reserving parking spaces in this manner can help to reduce initial construction costs, limit the creation of impervious surfaces, and increase opportunities for landscaping. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. 6. The proposed project is located in an area designated by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as a Special Protection Watershed. Special Protection Watersheds are important because Chester County s High Quality and Exceptional Value Watersheds may be especially sensitive to degradation and pollution that could result from development. The DEP or the municipality may impose stricter limitations on proposed wastewater and stormwater discharges in these watersheds, and special care should be exercised in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of stormwater control facilities in these areas to prevent degradation of the waters of the Commonwealth The Township Engineer should verify that the design and capacity of the proposed stormwater facilities conforms to ordinance provisions. The Township should verify that the proposed landscaping plan conforms to Township Ordinance landscape and screening requirements. The 2004 Road Functional Classification Technical Memorandum by the Chester County Planning Commission classifies Ridge Road (State Route 23) as a minor arterial road. We recommend that the applicant contact PennDOT to determine the appropriate right-of-way for this section of Ridge Road, and that it be offered for

46 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary Land Development - Conestoga Stone # LD South Coventry Township dedication. 10. The applicant and the Township should discuss the types of materials that may be stored in the storage bins, and whether any materials may require special handling or protection from stormwater runoff. Specifically, the applicant should also discuss whether any materials, such as wood chips or mulch, will be stored in areas that may be subject to being carried away by stormwater runoff. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUE: 11. A minimum of four copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of South Coventry Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, cc: Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner Edward B. Walsh and Associates, Inc. Katharine Trolier Matthew Miele, PennDOT District Permits Manager Francis J. Hanney, PennDOT Prevail Property Holding, LLC Chester County Health Department

47 January 15, 2016 Daniel C. Fox, Manager Easttown Township 566 Beaumont Road Devon, PA Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - 26 Main Avenue LLC # LD Easttown Township Dear Mr. Fox: A preliminary/final land development plan entitled "26 Main Avenue LLC", prepared by Site Engineering Concepts LLC, and dated July, 2013 and last revised December, 2015, was received by this office on December 24, This plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). We offer the following comments on the proposed land development for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - the west side of Main Avenue, north of Berwyn Avenue Site Acreage acres UPI L-109 Landscapes2 Designation - Suburban Center Landscape Watersheds Designation - Darby Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the construction of three residential units (a single-family residence and a twin house). The site plan identifies that the existing buildings on the site have been removed. The project site, which is served by public water and public sewer, is located in the VB Village of Berwyn zoning district. Vehicular access to all three units will be provided from a shared driveway entrance, and the Act 247 County Referral Form identifies that a homeowners association will be responsible for the common facilities/areas. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Easttown Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this land development plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Center Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed land development is consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Center Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

48 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - 26 Main Avenue LLC # LD Easttown Township WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Darby Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Darby Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and increase public access to and recreational use of streams. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Darby Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link. BACKGROUND: 3. The Chester County Planning Commission has previously reviewed two land development proposals for this site, the latest of which addressed the construction of a twin house (CCPC# LD , dated August 12, 2013). According to our records, this prior land development was approved by Easttown Township on October 7, 2013; we acknowledge the Act 247 County Referral Form identifies the current submission as a revision to the prior approved plan.

49 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary/Final Land Development - 26 Main Avenue LLC # LD Easttown Township PRIMARY ISSUES: 4. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance. 5. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 6. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Easttown Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: 26 Main Avenue LLC Site Engineering Concepts LLC

50 January 13, 2016 Tammy Swavely, Secretary West Vincent Township 729 S Matthews Rd. Chester Springs, PA Re: Final Subdivision - Laymen's Home Missionary Movement # SD West Vincent Township Dear Ms. Swavely: A final subdivision plan entitled "Laymen's Home Missionary Movement", prepared by Herbert E. MacCombie, and dated September 4, 2015, was received by this office on December 2, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - on the southwest corner of Miller Road and Saint Matthews Road Site Acreage acres UPI , Landscapes2 Designation - Rural Landscape Watersheds Designation - Birch Run subbasin of the French Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the transfer of 35,565 square feet between two existing parcels. No new sewage disposal or water supply is proposed. The project site is located in the R-2 Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issue raised in this letter be addressed and all West Vincent Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Rural Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the objectives of the Rural Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

51 Page: 2 Re: Final Subdivision - Laymen's Home Missionary Movement # SD West Vincent Township PRIMARY ISSUE: 2. The 2015 Multi-Modal Circulation Handbook by the Chester County Planning Commission classifies Saint Matthews Road as a minor collector road. The Handbook recommends an 0 foot-wide right-of-way (pages ) for minor collector roads to accommodate future road and infrastructure improvements. We recommend that the applicant and the Township contact PennDOT to determine the appropriate right-of-way for this section of Saint Matthews Road. We suggest that this area be identified as a dedicated right-of-way, and be offered for dedication to the appropriate agency. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: According to County Tax Assessment records, the land of the proposed subdivision appears to be subject to an Act 319 (Clean and Green) covenant. We advise the applicant to contact the Chester County Tax Assessment Office (telephone # ) regarding this subdivision. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office.

52 Page: 3 Re: Final Subdivision - Laymen's Home Missionary Movement # SD West Vincent Township This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of West Vincent Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, cc: Laymen's Home Missionary Movement Herbert E MacCombie Bible Standard Ministries Glenn Bentley Senior Planner

53 Teresa DeStefano, Planning Commission Secretary Thornbury Township Township Drive Cheyney, PA January 27, 2016 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Megill Homes Huntrise Lane # SD Thornbury Township Dear Ms. DeStefano: A preliminary subdivision plan entitled "Megill Homes Huntrise Lane", prepared by Inland Design, and dated December 11, 2015, was received by this office on January 4, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - west side of South Concord Road, south of Old Bailey Lane Site Acreage acres UPI A, , Landscapes2 Designation Suburban Landscape Watersheds Designation - Waln Run subbasin of the Chester Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the creation of 7 lots. The lots will be served by onsite water and onsite sewer. The project site is located in the A-Agricultural/Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Thornbury Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

54 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Megill Homes Huntrise Lane # SD Thornbury Township PRIMARY ISSUES: The site of the proposed subdivision is identified on the Thornbury Township Historic Resources Atlas. The 2005 aerial photographs and 2009 Google Earth data show a significant structure on parcel # , with direct access to South Concord Road. A recent visit to the site verified that this structure no longer exists, which is indicated on the submitted plan. The Township should verify whether this structure was a listed historic resource and whether its removal was consistent with all Township Historic Resource Preservation ordinances. The portion of South Concord Road along the frontage north of the intersection with South Westbourne is one lane controlled by yield signs at each end. The Township and the applicant should discuss widening this portion of South Concord Road to provide a travel lane in each direction. Creation of an additional lane on South Concord lane could improve response time for emergency service providers in this portion of the Township. The 2015 Multi-Modal Circulation Handbook by the Chester County Planning Commission classifies South Concord Road as a minor collector road. The Handbook recommends an 0 foot-wide right-of-way (page 193) for minor collector roads to accommodate future road and infrastructure improvements. The submitted plan appears to indicate a 25 foot-wide right-of-way on the west side of South Concord Road. We suggest that the Township balance the need for improved circulation with its adopted historic preservation policies in determining how adequate access to the proposed subdivision can be achieved. We further suggest that the Township contact its Architectural Historian to assist in reviewing the potential impact on historic resources in the immediate area.

55 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Megill Homes Huntrise Lane # SD Thornbury Township The plan does not indicate the proposed locations of either wells and/or sewage absorption areas. This plan should not be approved until both these features are shown on the plan. This information is necessary to verify that the proposed lots will have proper water supply and sewage disposal, and to demonstrate that minimum isolation distances between wells, sewage absorption areas and/or other features can be achieved. The site contains areas of hydric (wet) soils (Califon, Cokesbury and Gladstone) which have limitations to development. These limitations include drainage problems due to low permeability, low runoff rates and sub-surface saturation. When construction takes place on these soils, it interferes with the natural drainage of the land. If construction occurs on this site, on-site alterations to existing drainage patterns should be carefully inspected by the Township Engineer to insure that off-site drainage conditions are not negatively affected. In addition the Township Engineer should determine whether the soils found on this site are appropriate for on-site sewage disposal systems. The applicant is requesting a waiver from the provisions of the Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Waiver requests should only be considered following the determination that the proposed project either meets the purpose of these requirements or does not create the impacts that these provisions are intended to manage. The plan indicates that four (4) variances have been requested by the applicant. The Township should not grant final plan approval prior to the Zoning Hearing Board granting any variance requests. The final plan should accurately note the Zoning Hearing Board s decision, including any conditions of approval issued by the Board. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES:. 9. A copy of the plan should be submitted to the Chester County Health Department (CCHD) for their review and comment on the proposed sewage disposal and/or water supply. The municipality from the appropriate authority and company prior to final plan approval, if applicable, should receive confirmation on the availability of sufficient sewer and water capacity. A minimum of five (5) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds, the Assessment Office, and the Health Department. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Thornbury Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Glenn Bentley Senior Planner

56 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Megill Homes Huntrise Lane # SD Thornbury Township cc: Megill Homes Inland Design Chester County Health Department

57 January 20, 2016 Lisa M. Moore, Secretary/Manager Kennett Township 01 Burrows Run Rd. Chadds Ford, PA Re: Final Subdivision - Michael Pia # SD Kennett Township Dear Ms. Moore: A final subdivision plan entitled "Michael Pia", prepared by Regester Associates, Inc., and dated September 24, 2015, was received by this office on January 11, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - on the northwest corner of Bayard Road and East Hillendale Road Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Rural Landscape Watersheds Designation - East Branch subbasin of the Red Clay Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the creation of 2 lots. The lots will be served by on-site water and sewer service. The project site is located in the R-1 Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Kennett Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Rural Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the objectives of the Rural Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

58 Page: 2 Re: Final Subdivision - Michael Pia # SD Kennett Township PRIMARY ISSUES: It is our understanding that the purpose of the subdivision is to create a sending parcel to generate transferrable development rights to be used in another portion of the Township. The submitted plan does not include any information related to the transfer of development rights. We suggest that a plan note be added indicating that the purpose of the plan is to create a sending parcel to facilitate the transfer of development rights. This should help Township administrators in the future to keep track of all documents associated with the transfer of development rights. The applicant is requesting two waivers from the provisions of the Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Waiver requests should only be considered following the determination that the proposed project either meets the purpose of these requirements or does not create the impacts that these provisions are intended to manage. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: According to County Tax Assessment records, the land of the proposed subdivision appears to be subject to an Act 319 (Clean and Green) covenant. We advise the applicant to contact the Chester County Tax Assessment Office (telephone # ) regarding this subdivision. A minimum of five (5) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds, the Assessment Office, and the Health Department.

59 Page: 3 Re: Final Subdivision - Michael Pia # SD Kennett Township This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Kennett Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, cc: Michael Pia Regester Associates, Inc. Barkingfield Farm, LP Glenn Bentley Senior Planner

60 January 27, 2016 Tammy Swavely, Secretary West Vincent Township 729 S Matthews Rd. Chester Springs, PA Re: Final Subdivision - Benjamin Goldfield # SD West Vincent Township Dear Ms. Swavely: A final subdivision plan entitled "Benjamin Goldfield", prepared by Herbert E MacCombie, and dated November 20, 2015, was received by this office on January 13, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - southwest side of Flowing Springs Road, north of Hilltop Road Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation - Rural Landscape Watersheds Designation - the French Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the creation of 2 lots. The lots will be served by onsite water and onsite sewer. The project site is located in the R-3 Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all West Vincent Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Rural Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the objectives of the Rural Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

61 Page: 2 Re: Final Subdivision - Benjamin Goldfield # SD West Vincent Township PRIMARY ISSUES: Plan note #11 references the East Vincent Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance, this reference should be corrected prior the Township taking action on the plan. The applicant is requesting seven (7) waivers from the provisions of the Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Waiver requests should only be considered following the determination that the proposed project either meets the purpose of these requirements or does not create the impacts that these provisions are intended to manage. The 2015 Multi-Modal Circulation Handbook by the Chester County Planning Commission, which is available online at classifies Flowing Springs Road as a local distributor road. The Handbook (page 193) recommends a 50 foot-wide right-of-way for local distributor roads to accommodate future road and infrastructure improvements. We recommend that the applicant and the Township contact PennDOT to determine the appropriate right-of-way for this section of Flowing Springs Road. We suggest that this area be identified as a dedicated right-of-way, and be offered for dedication to the appropriate agency. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 5. A copy of the plan should be submitted to the Chester County Health Department (CCHD) for their review and comment on the proposed sewage disposal and/or water supply. The municipality from the appropriate authority and company prior to final plan approval, if applicable, should receive confirmation on the availability of sufficient sewer and water capacity.

62 Page: 3 Re: Final Subdivision - Benjamin Goldfield # SD West Vincent Township 6. A minimum of five (5) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds, the Assessment Office, and the Health Department. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of West Vincent Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Glenn Bentley Senior Planner cc: Herbert E MacCombie LTP Construction, LLC Tammy Swavely, West Vincent Township Secretary

63 January 27, 2016 Trish Fagan, Secretary New London Township PO Box 1002 New London, PA Re: Final Subdivision - Joseph Brackin # SD New London Township Dear Ms. Fagan: A final subdivision plan entitled "Joseph Brackin", prepared by Concord Land Planners and Surveyors, Inc., and dated December 31, 2015, was received by this office on January 14, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - northeast of Pennock Bridge Road, west of State Road Site Acreage acres UPI C, Landscapes2 Designation - Suburban Landscape Watersheds Designation - West Branch subbasin of the White Clay Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the transfer of 0.60 acres between two adjoining parcels. No new sewage disposal or water supply is proposed. The project site is located in the R-1 & R-2 zoning districts. RECOMMENDATION: The Township should ensure that all municipal requirements have been satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Landscape designation of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

64 Page: 2 Re: Final Subdivision - Joseph Brackin # SD New London Township ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: According to County Tax Assessment records, the land of the proposed subdivision appears to be subject to an Act 319 (Clean and Green) covenant. We advise the applicant to contact the Chester County Tax Assessment Office (telephone # ) regarding this subdivision. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of New London Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail.

65 Page: 3 Re: Final Subdivision - Joseph Brackin # SD New London Township Sincerely, cc: Glenn Bentley Senior Planner Joseph Brackin Concord Land Planners and Surveyors, Inc. Caitlin Ianni, Township Secretary, Penn Township

66 John R. Weller, AICP, Director of Planning & Zoning West Whiteland Township 101 Commerce Drive Exton, PA January 7, 2016 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Sunshine Management Subdivision # SD West Whiteland Township Dear Mr. Weller: A preliminary subdivision plan entitled "Sunshine Management Subdivision", prepared by DL Howell, and dated June 1, 2015, was received by this office on December 16, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - between Old Pottstown Pike and Pottstown Pike (Route 100), north of Waterwillow Road Site Acreage acres UPI Landscapes2 Designation Suburban and Natural Landscapes Watersheds Designation - Broad Run subbasin of the Brandywine Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the creation of seven single-family residential lots. Vehicular access to all seven lots will be provided from Old Pottstown Pike. The existing residence will be removed. The project site, which will be served by public water and public sewer, is located in the R-2 Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all West Whiteland Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this plan. COUNTY POLICY: LANDSCAPES: 1. The project site is located within the Suburban Landscape and Natural Landscape designations of Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Suburban Landscape is to promote new development to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate density, sustainable design, and smart transportation ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

67 Page: 2 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Sunshine Management Subdivision # SD West Whiteland Township principles. As an overlay of the basic landscapes, the objective of the Natural Landscape is to encourage the preservation and restoration of sensitive natural resources. While the proposed subdivision is generally consistent with the objectives of the Suburban Landscape, careful consideration of the proposed development activity is required due to the environmental constraints of the project site, particularly steep slopes. WATERSHEDS: 2. Watersheds, An Integrated Water Resources Plan for Chester County and Its Watersheds, is the water resources component of Landscapes2. Watersheds indicates that the proposed development activity is located within the Broad Run subbasin of the Brandywine Creek watershed. The highest priority management objectives identified in Watersheds for consideration in land development and land use planning within the Brandywine Creek watershed include: reduce stormwater runoff, restore water quality of impaired streams, and protect vegetated riparian corridors. These concerns and conditions should be taken into consideration in final site design decisions. Specific strategies for implementation to effectively address these items can be found in Part of Watersheds. A more detailed listing of water resources management needs and resources to be protected within the Brandywine Creek watershed can be found in Part 10 of Watersheds. Watersheds can be accessed at through the Water Information (Online Maps and Publications) link.

68 Page: 3 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Sunshine Management Subdivision # SD West Whiteland Township PRIMARY ISSUES: 3. The Township should verify that all necessary Ordinance relief measures to permit grading in steep slope areas have been granted and that the design of the slopes is consistent with all ordinance requirements related to permitted grades, the design and specifications of retaining walls and slope stabilization. 4. While we acknowledge, and endorse, that the applicant proposes the use of a shared driveway entrance for Lots 1, 2, and 3, we suggest that the applicant and Township investigate the feasibility of developing a shared access arrangement for these three lots and the adjoining parcel(s) to the south (both the site plan and aerial photography identify an existing driveway to the immediate south of the project site). We also suggest that the applicant and Township consider a shared driveway arrangement for Lots 4, 5 and 6. Shared driveways can reduce the number of new access points on public roads, limit impervious coverage, reduce earth disturbance and lower construction costs. 5. The Township should carefully examine the design of the Landscape Plan (Sheet 12), particularly pertaining to the adequacy of the landscaping provided to the rear of Lots 5 and 7, due to the close proximity of the proposed residences to Route The site contains areas of hydric (wet) soils (BaB Baile) which have limitations to development. These limitations include drainage problems due to low permeability, low runoff rates and sub-surface saturation. When construction takes place on these soils, it interferes with the natural drainage of the land. On-site alterations to existing drainage patterns should be carefully inspected by the Township Engineer to insure that off-site drainage conditions are not negatively affected. 7. In July 2013, the County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA was approved by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Land disturbance and land development activities that occur within Chester County must comply with the stormwater management standards included in the approved Act 167 Plan and the requirements of the municipality s County-Wide Act 167 stormwater ordinance. Implementation of the Act 167 Plan and ordinances will help reduce the impacts of stormwater and pollutant runoff to Chester County s streams and groundwater. The municipal engineer should thoroughly review the proposed plans to ensure compliance with the applicable standards of the County-wide Act 167 Plan as incorporated within the municipality s Act 167 stormwater management ordinance.. As of 2014, nearly every municipality in Chester County has at least one stream segment listed as impaired by the Pennsylvania Department of Environment Protection (DEP) and not meeting the applicable state water quality standards. The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the DEP information regarding the locations, sources and causes of listed water body impairments to ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the pollutant loading to an impaired water body. Information regarding listed impairments for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. 9. The proposed activity is located within a watershed for which one or more Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) pollutant load reduction requirements have been established by PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The municipal engineer and the applicant should review the TMDL report(s) for this watershed to determine if any requirements are applicable to this location, and if so, ensure that the proposed activity will not increase the relevant pollutant loading

69 Page: 4 Re: Preliminary Subdivision - Sunshine Management Subdivision # SD West Whiteland Township to the water body, and that the proposed activity achieves any applicable pollutant load reductions that may be required by municipal or state regulations, to the extent practicable. Information regarding TMDLs for Chester County water bodies can be found at through the TMDLs/Water Quality Improvement link. 10. The site contains land within the 100 year flood plain. Although it does not appear that any development activity will encroach into the floodplain, the applicant should be aware that the County Planning Commission opposes, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency and Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection regulate filling or development in the floodplain. Development within a floodplain can increase the magnitude and frequency of normally minor floods, and present health and safety problems. 11. While General Note 22 on Sheet 1 identifies there will be a homeowners association for this development which shall be responsible for the maintenance and protection of on-lot stormwater management structures, General Notes 23 and 31 both reference privately owned stormwater management facilities. This should be clarified by the applicant. ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 12. The applicant should contact the office of the Chester County Conservation District (CCCD) for information and clarification on erosion control measures. The provisions of the Commonwealth Erosion Control Regulations may apply to the project and may require an Earth Disturbance Permit or a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for discharge of stormwater from construction activities. 13. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of West Whiteland Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: Sunshine Management, LLC DL Howell Matthew Miele, District Permits Manager, PennDOT Francis J. Hanney, P.E., PennDOT Chester County Conservation District

70 January 12, 2016 David R. Burman, Manager Willistown Township 6 Sugartown Road Malvern, PA Re: Final Subdivision - The Delchester Group Inc. # SD Willistown Township Dear Mr. Burman: A final subdivision plan entitled "The Delchester Group Inc.", prepared by Chester Valley Engineers, Inc., and dated December 9, 2015, was received by this office on December 21, The plan is reviewed by the Chester County Planning Commission in accord with the provisions of Section 502 of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. We offer the following comments on the proposed subdivision for your consideration. PROJECT SUMMARY: Location - the north side of Goshen Road, and the west side of Sugartown Road Site Acreage acres UPI , , , Landscapes2 Designation Rural and Natural Landscapes Watersheds Designation - Ridley Creek watershed PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes the reconfiguration/consolidation of four existing parcels into three parcels (Subdivision Note #4 identifies that UPI# will be extinguished). No development activity is proposed as part of the current plan submission. The project site is located in the RU Residential zoning district. RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed and all Willistown Township requirements be satisfied before action is taken on this subdivision plan. PRIMARY ISSUES: 1. According to County Tax Assessment records, UPI# , , and appear to be subject to an Act 319 (Clean and Green) covenant. We advise the applicant to contact the Chester County Tax Assessment Office (telephone # ) regarding this subdivision. 2. The site is located within an agricultural security area adopted by the Township in accordance with the Agricultural Security Area Act (Act 43). Adoption of an agricultural security area is a public policy statement for the preservation of agriculture. We also note the Township s existing (2011) Official Map identifies all four parcels as land for Proposed Open Space Reservations. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

71 Page: 2 Re: Final Subdivision - The Delchester Group Inc. # SD Willistown Township ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES: 3. While Subdivision Note #3 states UPI# and are erroneously shown on separate lots on County Assessment Records, current (2016) County Assessment Records identify that UPI# , as of December 15, 2015 is a retired parcel which is now part of UPI# This should be corrected by the applicant. The Chester County Recorder of Deeds Office requires that the correct UPI numbers be identified on all subdivision and land development plans submitted for recording. 4. A minimum of four (4) copies of the plan should be presented at the Chester County Planning Commission for endorsement to permit recording of the final plan in accord with the procedures of Act 247, the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, and to meet the requirements of the Recorder of Deeds and the Assessment Office. This report does not review the plan for compliance to all aspects of your ordinance, as this is more appropriately done by agents of Willistown Township. However, we appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this plan. The staff of the Chester County Planning Commission is available to you to discuss this and other matters in more detail. Sincerely, cc: Chester Valley Engineers, Inc. The Delchester Group, Inc. Chester County Tax Assessment Office Paul Farkas Senior Planner

72 Proposed Plan and Ordinance Reviews

73 ORDINANCE PROPOSALS 1/1/2016 to 1/31/2016 The staff reviewed proposals for: Miscellaneous Ordinance (Misc.) Amendments Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance (SLDO) Amendments Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance (SLDO) Updates Zoning Ordinance Amendments TOTAL REVIEWS Total MUNICIPALITY REVIEW DATE FILE NO. TOPIC LANDSCAPES 2 CONSISTENCY East Pikeland Township 1/15/2016 MA Proposed - Misc Amendment The Township proposes to adopt a Land Use Assumptions Report, as part of the process towards adopting an Act 209 Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. Consistent Kennett Township 1/6/2016 MA Proposed - Misc Amendment Land Use Assumptions Report (Act 209 Transportation Plan) Consistent Oxford Borough 1/12/2016 SA Proposed - SLDO Amendment The Borough proposes to add Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities standards for non-residential development to Section of its SLDO. The Commission reviewed an earlier version of this amendment on September 1, 2015 (CCPC# SA ). Consistent Sadsbury Township 1/12/2016 SO Proposed - SLDO Update This is a comprehensive update to the Sadsbury Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Consistent January 2, 2016 Page 1 of 2

74 MUNICIPALITY REVIEW DATE FILE NO. TOPIC LANDSCAPES 2 CONSISTENCY East Brandywine Township 1/21/2016 ZA Proposed - Zoning Ordinance Amendment This relates to riparian buffers. Consistent London Grove Township 1/20/2016 ZA Proposed - Zoning Ordinance Amendment This amendment permits decks, patios and similar structures serving one- or two- family dwellings, and meeting the appropriate zoning district's required yard setback, to project into the required yard setback provided that the decks, patios and similar structures are at least 25 feet from rear property lines and at least 10 feet from side property lines. The current ordinance permits these projections to extend into the required yard setback provided they are not more than 10 feet from side or rear property lines. Not Relevant London Grove Township 1/20/2016 ZA Proposed - Zoning Ordinance Amendment This amendment changes Section D(2), which relates to the maximum height of commercial communication towers. The amendment reduces the maximum height from 10 to 150 feet. Another portion in this Section of the Zoning Ordinance currently permits one communication tower in the Township to a maximum height of 400 feet; this amendment reduces this maximum height to 200 feet. Consistent Oxford Borough 1/12/2016 ZA Proposed - Zoning Ordinance Amendment The Borough proposes to replace the existing definition of Use in Section of the Zoning Ordinance with the proposed definition of the term Use, Principal (also Use) set forth in Section 5 of the draft Ordinance. The Commission reviewed an earlier version of this amendment on September 1, 2015 (CCPC# ZA ). Not Relevant West Chester Borough 1/12/2016 ZA Proposed - Zoning Ordinance Amendment The Borough proposes to amend the height regulations of the IS Institutional Zoning District in Section of its Zoning Ordinance. Not Relevant TOTAL NUMBER OF ORDINANCE PROPOSALS WITH RELEVANCE TO LANDSCAPES2: 6 TOTAL NUMBER OF ORDINANCE PROPOSALS CONSISTENT WITH LANDSCAPES2: 6 January 2, 2016 Page 2 of 2

75 Ordinance Review Letters

76 January 6, 2016 Lisa M. Moore, Secretary/Manager Kennett Township 01 Burrows Run Road Chadds Ford, PA Re: Proposed Land Use Assumptions Report # MA Kennett Township Dear Ms. Moore: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Kennett Township Land Use Assumptions Report (Act 209), prepared by Remington Vernick & Beach Engineers and submitted to the County Planning Commission pursuant to the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC) Section 504-A.(c)(3). The referral for review was received by this office on December 15, 2015, and we offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed Land Use Assumptions Report. COMMENTS: 1. The Land Use Assumptions Report extensively references the Township's Comprehensive Plan and includes an extensive "yields analysis" that estimates potential development through Page 3 of the Land Use Assumptions Report states that the study area for the analysis is 14. square miles. We note that Section 507-A of the Municipalities Planning Code (i.e., the definitions section) limits the "transportation service area" to seven square miles. The Township should ensure that the transportation capital improvements plan that results from this study will not exceed seven square miles. 2. The Township should provide a copy of the Land Use Assumptions Report to all contiguous municipalities and to the local school district as required by MPC 504-A.(c)(3). RECOMMENDATION: Kennett Township should consider the comments contained in this review prior to taking action on the Land Use Assumptions Report. We request an official copy of the decision made by the Board of Supervisors. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your action. Sincerely, Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

77 Kisha Tyler, Zoning Officer East Pikeland Township P.O. Box 5 Kimberton, PA January 15, 2016 Re: Land Use Assumptions Report # MA East Pikeland Township Dear Ms. Tyler: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed Land Use Assumptions Report, prepared by Theurkauf Design & Planning, LLC, and dated December 22, 2015, as submitted by East Pikeland Township pursuant to the provisions of Section 504-A.(c)(3) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC). The referral for review was received by this office on December 22, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed Land Use Assumptions Report. DESCRIPTION: 1. East Pikeland Township proposes to adopt a Land Use Assumptions Report, as part of the process towards adopting an Act 209 Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. Article V-A of the MPC allows municipalities to adopt a Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and impose impact fees to offset costs for transportation capital improvements that result from the additional traffic generated by new development. Section 504-A.(c)(3) of the MPC requires that a land use assumptions report be prepared prior to the adoption of the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance. The Land Use Assumptions Report provides an overview and background for the report; an existing conditions and trends analysis, including 2025 population estimates, and residential and non-residential development projections; projected future development; and summary findings for future development by land use type. Paragraph 1 of the document overview and background identifies that the Transportation Service Area (TSA) shown on Map 1: Act 209-Study Area Intersections is seven square miles, the maximum area permitted by Act 209. We acknowledge that the December 22, 2015 cover letter identifies that the Township has also submitted the draft report to its adjoining municipalities, and the Phoenixville Area School District, as required by Section 504-A.(c)(3) of the MPC, along with the Phoenixville Regional Planning Commission. LANDSCAPES: 2. The proposed Transportation Area shown on Map 1 is situated in the Suburban, Rural, Urban and Natural Landscape designations of Landscapes2, the 2009 Chester County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Suburban Landscape is to promote new development to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. The objective of the Rural Landscape is to preserve the open, rural character of Chester County, enhance villages within their historic settings, and ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

78 Page: 2 Re: Land Use Assumptions Report # MA East Pikeland Township accommodate appropriate developments in rural centers. The objective of the Urban Landscape is to target urban areas as the core centers of population, employment, commerce, institutions, services, and culture, using Smart Growth and smart transportation principles. As an overlay of the basic landscapes, the objective of the Natural Landscape is to encourage the preservation and restoration of sensitive natural resources. The proposed Land Use Assumptions Report is consistent with Landscapes2. COMMENTS: 3. We recommend that the Township, in both its review of the land use assumptions report and future development of the associated Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance, reference the information provided on pages of the County Planning Commission s 2015 Multimodal Circulation Handbook on traffic impact fee studies. The Handbook is available online at: 4. While Map 1 identifies the location of study area intersections within the TSA, and a brief list of roads in the Township is provided on Page 4, no information is provided on existing roadway conditions. It would be helpful for the Township to provide an assessment of the physical characteristics of the Township s existing roadway system. 5. Section 504-A(d)(1) of the MPC requires the preparation of a roadway sufficiency analysis upon adoption of the land use assumptions report. We recommend that the projected additional development in the Township be closely linked to current levels of service for existing roadways in the Township, so that the effects of future development can be clearly identified. RECOMMENDATION: East Pikeland Township should consider the comments contained in this review prior to taking action on this Land Use Assumptions Report. We request an official copy of the decision made by the Board of Supervisors. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner cc: Edward A. Theurkauf, Theurkauf Design & Planning

79 January 12, 2016 Betsy Brantner, Manager Oxford Borough 401 Market Street P.O. Box 30 Oxford, PA Re: Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Amendment - Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities: Non-residential Applications # SA Oxford Borough Dear Ms. Brantner: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 505(a). The referral for review was received by this office on December 21, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed amendment. DESCRIPTION: 1. Oxford Borough has proposed the following amendments to its SLDO, as set forth in Sections 1 through 4 of the draft Ordinance: A. Add a definition for the term Use, Principal (also Use) to Section G; B. Change the title of Section from Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities to Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities: Residential Applications ; C. Renumber Sections , and as Section , and , respectively; and D. Add a new Section , Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities: Non-residential Applications. A statement of intent and standards for required recreation land/facilities or fees in lieu thereof are provided. 2. Section 5 of the draft Ordinance, which addresses replacing the existing definition of Use in Section the Borough Zoning Ordinance with the proposed definition of the term Use, Principal (also Use), is addressed by the Commission in a separate review (CCPC# ZA ). COMMENTS: 3. The Commission reviewed an earlier version of this SLDO amendment on September 1, 2015 (CCPC# SD ). The Commission recommended in its previous review that the fee-in-lieu rate not be included in the proposed ordinance language. We acknowledge, and endorse, that Section B(6) has been revised to state that the fee-in-lieu shall be set by a resolution of Borough Council. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

80 Page: 2 Re: Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Amendment - Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities: Non-residential Applications # SA Oxford Borough RECOMMENDATION: The County Planning Commission recommends that Oxford Borough adopt the proposed Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance amendment. We request an official copy of the decision made by Borough Council, as required by Section 505(b) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner

81 January 12, 2016 Linda Shank, Secretary Sadsbury Township 2920 Lincoln Highway, PO Box 261 Sadsburyville, PA Re: Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Update # SO Sadsbury Township Dear Ms. Shank: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed ordinance as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 505(a). The referral for review was received by this office on December 7, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed ordinance. LANDSCAPES: 1. Sadsbury Township is located within the Agricultural, Rural, Suburban, Natural, as well as Urban Landscapes (in areas adjoining Parkesburg Borough), as designated in Landscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan. The objective of the Agricultural Landscape is to preserve the agricultural industry and cultural heritage of Chester County by supporting a productive agricultural network and preserving prime soil resources. The objective of the Rural Landscape is to preserve the open, rural character of Chester County, enhance villages within their historic settings, and accommodate appropriate developments in rural centers. The objective of the Suburban Landscape is to promote new development to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. Additionally, Landscapes2 supports infill development and redevelopment efforts in the Suburban Landscape based upon infrastructure capacity and environmental constraints. As an overlay of the basic landscapes, the objective of the Natural Landscape is to encourage the preservation and restoration of sensitive natural resources. The objective of the Urban Landscape is to target urban areas as the core centers of population, employment, commerce, institutions, services, and culture, using Smart Growth and smart transportation principles. The proposed Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance is consistent with the objectives of the Agricultural, Rural, Suburban, Natural, as well as the Urban Landscape. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

82 Page: 2 Re: Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Update # SO Sadsbury Township COMMENTS: The definition of "caliper" typically references the diameter of a tree trunk at 4.5 feet above the ground surface, not 3.5 feet in the Definitions section of the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Update. In Section 301A. of the Update, note that the Chester County Planning Commission requires four copies of plans for endorsement when public sewer facilities are proposed, and five copies when individual or community sewage disposal systems are proposed. Section 417.F. of the Update requires that the paved width of sidewalks shall be a minimum of four feet. The Multi-Modal Circulation Handbook for Chester County (available at recommends a minimum sidewalk width of five feet for Suburban areas. Parts of Sadsbury Township are located within the Suburban Landscape as designated by Landscapes2 (refer to LANDSCAPES Comment 1), and we suggest that the Township require five-foot sidewalk widths in Suburban Landscape areas, as well as the Urban Landscape areas adjacent to Parkesburg Borough. Note that the MPC defines "development plan"; the proposed Update only defines the term "development". In the definition of "capped sewers", existing sanitary sewer facilities should probably also include public or community sewers. Section 304.B.3.f. requires the submission of specific types of reproducible and electronic copies of final plans. To allow for advances in digital technology, it may be more appropriate to specify that plan submissions should be in the forms currently required by the Township and the County Recorder of Deeds. (Section 304.C.1.a. also refers to a specific version of AutoCAD2000). According to the Chester County Pipeline Information Center at Williams Gas Pipeline (Transco) operates a gas transmission pipeline in Sadsbury Township (shown at: To coordinate development near these pipelines and limit the potential for land use conflicts, the Pipeline Information Center contains draft regulatory language that is designed to buffer new development that is proposed near transmission pipelines, at We suggest that the Township consider adding this language in its Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. Section 302 includes a substantial amount of required content for sketch plan submissions. While this Section states that a sketch plan is not required, the Chester County Planning Commission strongly endorses the use of sketch plans. A sketch plan allows the applicant to receive County and Township comments and incorporate design requirements and recommendations before time and money are expended on preparing an engineered preliminary or final plan. The sketch plan provides an opportunity to coordinate the development of a parcel that better utilizes the potential of the land, rather than piecemeal subdivision and development. Therefore, we suggest that the Township reduce the amount of required sketch plan submission requirements in order to further encourage its use.

83 Page: 3 Re: Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Update # SO Sadsbury Township RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that the issues raised in this letter be addressed before action is taken on the proposed ordinance. We request an official copy of the decision made by the Board of Supervisors, as required by Section 505(b) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner

84 January 21, 2016 Mary Beth Smedley, Secretary/Treasurer East Brandywine Township 1214 Horseshoe Pike Downingtown, PA Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Riparian Corridor Conservation District # ZA East Brandywine Township Dear Ms. Smedley: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed zoning amendment as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 609(e). The referral for review was received by this office on January 11, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed zoning amendment. COMMENTS: This is an amendment to the Riparian Corridor Conservation District. Forested Riparian Corridor, Impacted Riparian Corridor, and Land Disturbance are defined. The extent of the Riparian Corridor Conservation District overlay is established, limitations on permissible land uses within this area is specified, and modification procedures to the requirements and limitations of the Riparian Corridor Conservation District are established (unique physical conditions must be shown). The Chester County Planning Commission reviewed a previous version of this amendment and our comments were forwarded to the Township in a letter dated November 1, 2015 (refer to ZA ). The current version of this amendment is not significantly different from the earlier version that we reviewed and recommended for approval, and we have no additional comments on this amendment. RECOMMENDATION: amendment. East Brandywine Township should adopt the proposed zoning We request an official copy of the decision made by the Board of Supervisors, as required by Section 609(g) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

85 January 12, 2016 Michael Perrone, Zoning Officer West Chester Borough 401 East Gay Street West Chester, PA 1930 Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Height Regulations, IS Institutional District # ZA West Chester Borough Dear Mr. Perrone: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed zoning amendment as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 609(e). The referral for review was received by this office on December 1, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed zoning amendment. DESCRIPTION: 1. West Chester Borough proposes to amend the height regulations of the IS Institutional Zoning District in Section of its Zoning Ordinance. BACKGROUND: 2. The County Planning Commission previously reviewed an amendment to the height regulations of the IS District on September 10, 2012 (CCPC# ZA ). According to our records, this amendment, which allows by conditional use a building used as a dormitory or student housing to be built above the 40 foot by-right height limit up to a maximum height of 90 feet, along with allowing any other type of building proposed to be built above the 40 foot by-right height limit by conditional use in accord with the standards in this section, was approved by the Borough on September 19, 2012 (Borough Ordinance No ). The current amendment would replace the existing standards in Section with a single standard that the maximum height of buildings or other structures erected, enlarged or used in the IS District shall be 40 feet. COMMENTS: 3. We acknowledge that West Chester Borough is currently undertaking an update of its 2000 Comprehensive Plan, which is being prepared under the Chester County Vision Partnership Program (VPP), and it is our understanding that this zoning amendment is being considered by the Borough as part of its long-term effects in guiding future development activity in this area of the Borough (we note the IS District applies to West Chester University s North Campus). We recommend that the Borough and West Chester University continue to cooperatively work to pro-actively address land use issues in this area of the Borough, particularly student housing. Lanscapes2, the 2009 County Comprehensive Plan, recommends that municipalities and schools regularly communicate and share information about school plans and programs, and municipal planning efforts. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

86 Page: 2 Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Height Regulations, IS Institutional District # ZA West Chester Borough We also recommend that the Borough should consider delaying any additional amendments to its zoning ordinance until after the current Comprehensive Plan Update is completed. RECOMMENDATION: West Chester Borough should consider the comments in this letter before acting on the proposed zoning amendment. We request an official copy of the decision made by Borough Council, as required by Section 609(g) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner

87 Betsy Brantner, Manager Oxford Borough 401 Market Street P.O. Box 30 Oxford, PA January 12, 2016 Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Definition of Use, Principal (also Use) # ZA Oxford Borough Dear Ms. Brantner: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed zoning amendment as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 609(e). The referral for review was received by this office on December 21, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed amendment. DESCRIPTION: 1. Oxford Borough proposes to replace the existing definition of Use in Section of the Borough Zoning Ordinance with the proposed definition of the term Use, Principal (also Use) set forth in Section 5 of the draft Ordinance. 2. Sections 1 through 4 of the draft Ordinance, which address amendments to the Open Space and Recreation Lands and Facilities standards in the Borough Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance (SLDO), are addressed by the Commission in a separate review (CCPC# SA ). We note the proposed definition of Use, Principal (also Use) in Section 5 of the draft Ordinance is identical to the proposed definition to be added to be Borough SLDO, as set forth in Section 1 of the draft Ordinance. COMMENTS: 3. The Commission reviewed an earlier version of this zoning amendment on September 1, 2015 (CCPC# ZA , dated September 1, 2015). The proposed definition, which is identical to the definition in the prior amendment, is appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: Oxford Borough should adopt the proposed zoning amendment. We request an official copy of the decision made by Borough Council, as required by Section 609(g) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Paul Farkas Senior Planner ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

88 January 20, 2016 Steven Brown, Manager London Grove Township 372 Rose Hill Road, Suite 100 West Grove, PA Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment Projections into Required Yards: One- or Two- Family Dwellings # ZA London Grove Township Dear Mr. Brown: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed zoning amendment as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 609(e). The referral for review was received by this office on December 21, This amendment permits decks, patios and similar structures serving one- or two- family dwellings, and meeting the appropriate zoning district's required yard setback, to project into the required yard setback provided that the decks, patios and similar structures are at least 25 feet from rear property lines and at least 10 feet from side property lines. The current ordinance permits these projections to extend into the required yard setback provided they are not more than 10 feet from side or rear property lines. We have no comments on the proposed zoning amendment. RECOMMENDATION: London Grove Township should act on the proposed zoning amendment according to its own considerations. We request an official copy of the decision made by the Board of Supervisors, as required by Section 609(g) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

89 January 20, 2016 Steven Brown, Manager London Grove Township 372 Rose Hill Road, Suite 100 West Grove, PA Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendments Communication Tower Height # ZA London Grove Township Dear Mr. Brown: The Chester County Planning Commission has reviewed two proposed zoning amendments as submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, Section 609(e). The referral for review was received by this office on December 21, We offer the following comments to assist in your review of the proposed zoning amendments. COMMENTS: 1. This amendments contain alternative changes to London Grove Township Zoning Ordinance Section D(2), which relates to the maximum height of commercial communication towers. One of the amendments limits the maximum height to 10 feet; the other amendment limits the maximum height to 150 feet. Another portion in this Section of the Zoning Ordinance currently permits one communication tower in the Township to be constructed to a maximum height of 400 feet; both of these amendments reduce the maximum height to 200 feet. 2. Our copy of the London Grove Township Zoning Ordinance contains an amendment to Section 1735 Communication Towers (Ordinance 16 of 2011, adopted by the Township on August 10, 2011). This Section 1735 contains paragraph Section 1735D.(2), which appears to contain the language that is the subject of these amendments. However, the amendments that were submitted to the Chester County Planning Commission reference Section of the Codified Ordinances of London Grove Township. It appears that Section of the Codified Ordinances of London Grove Township contains similar regulations to Section 1735 Communication Towers of the Township Zoning Ordinance. The Township should ensure that the adopted amendment does not result in conflicting Ordinance language. 3. Act 191 of 2012, the Pennsylvania Wireless Broadband Collocation Act, which went into effect on December 23, 2012, provides for streamlined procedures for municipal review of applications for the modification or collocation of wireless communications facilities and wireless support structures. Prior to taking action on this amendment, the Township Solicitor should ensure that the proposed ordinance language is consistent with the applicable provisions of this Act. 4. The applicant should contact the County Department of Emergency Services Technical Division at to coordinate any technical matters relating to communication tower height. ccplanningchesco.org Web site:

90 Page: 2 Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Communication Tower Height # ZA London Grove Township RECOMMENDATION: The Commission recommends that London Grove Township consider the comments in this letter before acting on the proposed amendment. We request an official copy of the decision made by the Board of Supervisors, as required by Section 609(g) of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. This will allow us to maintain a current file copy of your ordinance. Sincerely, cc: Chester County Department of Emergency Services Wes Bruckno, AICP Senior Planner

91 Act 537 Reviews

92 Act 537 Reviews for Chester County January 2016 Phase II Collection System Improvements Upper Uwchlan Township 76,275 gpd Consistent with Map & Policies Consistent with Map, Inconsistent with Policies Inconsistent with Map & Policies!( 2205 White Horse Road Easttown Township 1,200 gpd Legend!(!(!( January Act 537 Reviews Landscapes2 Agricultural Rural Center Suburban Center Urban Rural Suburban Map prepared February 2016 The Dwell at Caln CalnTownship 9,250 gpd Data Sources: Act 537 Review - created by Chester County Planning Commission, 2011; Landscapes2 - Chester County Municipalities - Chester County DCIS/GIS; Planning Commission, November 9, Miles

93 Minor Revisions

94 300-FM-WSWM0362B Rev. 9/2005 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEP CODE # J DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SEWAGE FACILITIES PLANNING MODULE COMPONENT 4B - COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW (or Planning Agency with Areawide Jurisdiction) Note to Project Sponsor: To expedite the review of your proposal, one copy of your completed planning package and one copy of this Planning Agency Review Component should be sent to the existing county planning agency or planning agency with areawide jurisdiction for their comments. SECTION A. PROJECT NAME (See Section A of instructions) Project Name & Municipality The Dwell at Caln, Caln Township SECTION B. REVIEW SCHEDULE (See Section B of instructions) 1. Date plan received by county planning agency. November 16, Date plan received by planning agency with areawide jurisdiction N/A Agency name N/A 3. Date review completed by agency January 11, 2016 SECTION C. AGENCY REVIEW (See Section C of instructions) Yes No X X X X X 1. Is there a county or areawide comprehensive plan adopted under the Municipalities Planning Code (53 P.S et seq.)? Landscapes2, the Chester County Comprehensive Plan, was adopted in Watersheds, the Chester County Comprehensive Plan Integrated Water Resources Element, was adopted in Is this proposal consistent with the comprehensive plan for land use? According to the Landscapes2 map, adopted November 2009, the proposed land development is designated as occurring in the following: Suburban Landscape: Objective LU 3 for this Landscape states: Promote new development in suburban landscapes to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. Both on-lot and public sewer systems are encouraged in this landscape. The Natural Landscape is a network of natural resources that overlays one or more of the above landscapes. While it does not preclude development or agricultural operations, it indicates major areas of natural resources that should be protected and subject to limited disturbance. Sewer facility impacts should be minimized in this landscape, and natural resources should be preserved or restored. 3. Does this proposal meet the goals and objectives of the plan? If no, describe goals and objectives that are not met While the proposed project is located within the Suburban Landscape, it is also almost entirely located within the Natural Resources Overlay. Removal of most of the wooded features of this parcel would be inconsistent with Landscapes2 Policy NR 2.3, which states: Protect, restore, expand, and manage tree resources, including forests, riparian buffers, streetscapes, public lands, vegetated steep slopes, greenways, wooded public lands, and open space plantings within developments. 4. Is this proposal consistent with the use, development, and protection of water resources? If no, describe inconsistency 5. Is this proposal consistent with the county or areawide comprehensive land use planning relative to Prime Agricultural Land Preservation? If no, describe inconsistencies: X 6. Does this project propose encroachments, obstructions, or dams that will affect wetlands? If yes, describe impact: 7. Will any known historical or archaeological resources be impacted by this project? Not Known. If yes, describe impacts X. Will any known endangered or threatened species of plant or animal be impacted by the development project? X 9. Is there a county or areawide zoning ordinance? No 10. Does this proposal meet the zoning requirements of the ordinance? N/A

95 300-FM-WSWM0362B Rev. 9/2005 Yes No SECTION C. AGENCY REVIEW (continued) 11. Have all applicable zoning approvals been obtained? N/A X 12. Is there a county or areawide subdivision and land development ordinance? No 13. Does this proposal meet the requirements of the ordinance? N/A If no, describe which requirements are not met X 14. Is this proposal consistent with the municipal Act 537 Official Sewage Facilities Plan? If no, describe inconsistency 15. Are there any wastewater disposal needs in the area adjacent to this proposal that should be considered by the municipality? Not known If yes, describe 16. Has a waiver of the sewage facilities planning requirements been requested for the residual tract of this subdivision? If yes, is the proposed waiver consistent with applicable ordinances. Not Known If no, describe inconsistencies X 17. Does the county have a stormwater management plan as required by the Stormwater Management Act? If yes, will this project plan require the implementation of storm water management measures? Chester County's stormwater management (SWM) plan was approved by PA DEP on July 2, According to our records, Caln Township updated their stormwater management ordinance on December 19, Name, Title and signature of person completing this section: Name: Carrie J. Conwell Title: Environmental Planner Signature: Date: January 11, 2016 Name of County or Areawide Planning Agency: Chester County Planning Commission Address: Government Services Center, Suite Westtown Road P.O. Box 2747 West Chester, PA Telephone Number: (610) SECTION D. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (See Section D of instructions) This submission does ý does not indicate that the Planning Module is consistent with Township planning. Please be advised that DEP may require additional information from the municipality and/or applicant to determine consistency with local planning and/ or to show references to Act 537 planning and applicable municipal ordinances. The county planning agency must complete this Component within 60 days. This Component and any additional comments are to be returned to the applicant. cc: Elizabeth Mahoney, PaDEP Chester County Health Department Clay Chandler, Site Contact Scot Gill, Caln Township David Gibbons, D. L. Howell and Assoc., Inc.

96 300-FM-WSWM0362B Rev. 9/2005 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEP CODE # DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SEWAGE FACILITIES PLANNING MODULE COMPONENT 4B - COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW (or Planning Agency with Areawide Jurisdiction) Note to Project Sponsor: To expedite the review of your proposal, one copy of your completed planning package and one copy of this Planning Agency Review Component should be sent to the existing county planning agency or planning agency with areawide jurisdiction for their comments. SECTION A. PROJECT NAME (See Section A of instructions) Project Name & Municipality 2205 White Horse Road Subdivision, Easttown Township SECTION B. REVIEW SCHEDULE (See Section B of instructions) 1. Date plan received by county planning agency. January 04, Date plan received by planning agency with areawide jurisdiction N/A Agency name N/A 3. Date review completed by agency January 11, 2016 SECTION C. AGENCY REVIEW (See Section C of instructions) Yes No X X X X X 1. Is there a county or areawide comprehensive plan adopted under the Municipalities Planning Code (53 P.S et seq.)? Landscapes2, the Chester County Comprehensive Plan, was adopted in Watersheds, the Chester County Comprehensive Plan Integrated Water Resources Element, was adopted in Is this proposal consistent with the comprehensive plan for land use? According to the Landscapes2 map, adopted November 2009, the proposed land development is designated as occurring in the following: Rural Landscape: Objective LU 4 for this Landscape states: Preserve the open, rural character of Chester County, enhance villages within their historic settings, and accommodate appropriate development in rural centers. Public sewer systems are discouraged in this landscape. 3. Does this proposal meet the goals and objectives of the plan? If no, describe goals and objectives that are not met 4. Is this proposal consistent with the use, development, and protection of water resources? If no, describe inconsistency Landscapes2 Policy NR 3.10 states: Restore degraded and impaired streams and ground water to achieve state designated water quality standards and support upgrades in state stream designations where justified by stream conditions and uses. According to PA Code Title 25, Chapter 93, this proposal is located in a watershed or sub-watershed that has a stream use designated as Exceptional Value Waters or High Quality Waters. These streams are given high priority when considering watershed protection measures. The applicant may need to conduct further coordination with DEP or other agencies in order to comply with the water quality standards set forth in this regulation. 5. Is this proposal consistent with the county or areawide comprehensive land use planning relative to Prime Agricultural Land Preservation? If no, describe inconsistencies: X 6. Does this project propose encroachments, obstructions, or dams that will affect wetlands? If yes, describe impact: 7. Will any known historical or archaeological resources be impacted by this project? Not Known. If yes, describe impacts X. Will any known endangered or threatened species of plant or animal be impacted by the development project? X 9. Is there a county or areawide zoning ordinance? No 10. Does this proposal meet the zoning requirements of the ordinance? N/A

97 300-FM-WSWM0362B Rev. 9/2005 Yes No SECTION C. AGENCY REVIEW (continued) 11. Have all applicable zoning approvals been obtained? N/A X 12. Is there a county or areawide subdivision and land development ordinance? No 13. Does this proposal meet the requirements of the ordinance? N/A If no, describe which requirements are not met X 14. Is this proposal consistent with the municipal Act 537 Official Sewage Facilities Plan? If no, describe inconsistency 15. Are there any wastewater disposal needs in the area adjacent to this proposal that should be considered by the municipality? Not known If yes, describe 16. Has a waiver of the sewage facilities planning requirements been requested for the residual tract of this subdivision? If yes, is the proposed waiver consistent with applicable ordinances. Not Known If no, describe inconsistencies X 17. Does the county have a stormwater management plan as required by the Stormwater Management Act? If yes, will this project plan require the implementation of storm water management measures? Chester County's stormwater management (SWM) plan was approved by PA DEP on July 2, According to our records, Easttown Township updated their stormwater management ordinance on November 1, Name, Title and signature of person completing this section: Name: Carrie J. Conwell Title: Environmental Planner Signature: Date: January 11, 2016 Name of County or Areawide Planning Agency: Chester County Planning Commission Address: Government Services Center, Suite Westtown Road P.O. Box 2747 West Chester, PA Telephone Number: (610) SECTION D. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (See Section D of instructions) This submission does ý does not indicate that the Planning Module is consistent with Township planning. Please be advised that DEP may require additional information from the municipality and/or applicant to determine consistency with local planning and/ or to show references to Act 537 planning and applicable municipal ordinances. The Chester County Planning Commission recommends that all municipalities adopt an ordinance requiring regular management, inspection and pump-out of all individual sewage systems, established in a legally enforceable manner. A municipal management program will be essential in helping to assure the long-term viability of the individual systems that are proposed in this project. The county planning agency must complete this Component within 60 days. This Component and any additional comments are to be returned to the applicant. cc: Elizabeth Mahoney, PaDEP Chester County Health Department William J. Kyle, Site Contact Daniel Fox, Easttown Township Bruce Rader, Berks Surveying & Engineering, Inc.

98 300-FM-WSWM0362B Rev. 9/2005 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEP CODE # - No Code DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Assigned - BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SEWAGE FACILITIES PLANNING MODULE COMPONENT 4B - COUNTY PLANNING AGENCY REVIEW (or Planning Agency with Areawide Jurisdiction) Note to Project Sponsor: To expedite the review of your proposal, one copy of your completed planning package and one copy of this Planning Agency Review Component should be sent to the existing county planning agency or planning agency with areawide jurisdiction for their comments. SECTION A. PROJECT NAME (See Section A of instructions) Project Name & Municipality Phase II Collection System Improvements, Upper Uwchlan Township SECTION B. REVIEW SCHEDULE (See Section B of instructions) 1. Date plan received by county planning agency. December 29, Date plan received by planning agency with areawide jurisdiction N/A Agency name N/A 3. Date review completed by agency January 06, 2016 SECTION C. AGENCY REVIEW (See Section C of instructions) Yes No X X X X X 1. Is there a county or areawide comprehensive plan adopted under the Municipalities Planning Code (53 P.S et seq.)? Landscapes2, the Chester County Comprehensive Plan, was adopted in Watersheds, the Chester County Comprehensive Plan Integrated Water Resources Element, was adopted in Is this proposal consistent with the comprehensive plan for land use? According to the Landscapes2 map, adopted November 2009, the proposed land development is designated as occurring in the following: Suburban Landscape: Objective LU 3 for this Landscape states: Promote new development in suburban landscapes to accommodate anticipated population and employment growth, using appropriate density, sustainable design, and smart transportation principles. Both on-lot and public sewer systems are encouraged in this landscape. 3. Does this proposal meet the goals and objectives of the plan? If no, describe goals and objectives that are not met 4. Is this proposal consistent with the use, development, and protection of water resources? If no, describe inconsistency Landscapes2 Policy NR 3.10 states: Restore degraded and impaired streams and ground water to achieve state designated water quality standards and support upgrades in state stream designations where justified by stream conditions and uses. According to PA Code Title 25, Chapter 93, this proposal is located in a watershed or sub-watershed that has a stream use designated as High Quality Waters. These streams are given high priority when considering watershed protection measures. The applicant may need to conduct further coordination with DEP or other agencies in order to comply with the water quality standards set forth in this regulation. 5. Is this proposal consistent with the county or areawide comprehensive land use planning relative to Prime Agricultural Land Preservation? If no, describe inconsistencies: X 6. Does this project propose encroachments, obstructions, or dams that will affect wetlands? If yes, describe impact: Landscapes 2 Policy NR 2.2 states: Protect and manage wetlands for their hydrologic and ecological functions, and identify opportunities to mitigate, restore, and create wetlands. The project site contains delineated wetlands, although it does not appear that any proposed development activity will encroach upon them. The applicant should be aware that placement of fill in wetlands is regulated by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (1977) and PA DEP Chapter 105 Rules and Regulations. 7. Will any known historical or archaeological resources be impacted by this project? Not Known. If yes, describe impacts X. Will any known endangered or threatened species of plant or animal be impacted by the development project? X 9. Is there a county or areawide zoning ordinance? No 10. Does this proposal meet the zoning requirements of the ordinance? N/A

99 300-FM-WSWM0362B Rev. 9/2005 Yes No SECTION C. AGENCY REVIEW (continued) 11. Have all applicable zoning approvals been obtained? N/A X 12. Is there a county or areawide subdivision and land development ordinance? No 13. Does this proposal meet the requirements of the ordinance? N/A If no, describe which requirements are not met X 14. Is this proposal consistent with the municipal Act 537 Official Sewage Facilities Plan? If no, describe inconsistency 15. Are there any wastewater disposal needs in the area adjacent to this proposal that should be considered by the municipality? Not known If yes, describe 16. Has a waiver of the sewage facilities planning requirements been requested for the residual tract of this subdivision? If yes, is the proposed waiver consistent with applicable ordinances. Not Known If no, describe inconsistencies X 17. Does the county have a stormwater management plan as required by the Stormwater Management Act? If yes, will this project plan require the implementation of storm water management measures? Chester County's stormwater management (SWM) plan was approved by PA DEP on July 2, According to our records, Upper Uwchlan Township updated their stormwater management ordinance on December 16, Name, Title and signature of person completing this section: Name: Carrie J. Conwell Title: Environmental Planner Signature: Date: January 06, 2016 Name of County or Areawide Planning Agency: Chester County Planning Commission Address: Government Services Center, Suite Westtown Road P.O. Box 2747 West Chester, PA Telephone Number: (610) SECTION D. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (See Section D of instructions) This submission ý does does not indicate that the Planning Module is consistent with Township planning. Please be advised that DEP may require additional information from the municipality and/or applicant to determine consistency with local planning and/ or to show references to Act 537 planning and applicable municipal ordinances. The county planning agency must complete this Component within 60 days. This Component and any additional comments are to be returned to the applicant. cc: Elizabeth Mahoney, PaDEP Chester County Health Department Matthew Brown, Site Contact Cary Vargo, Upper Uwchlan Township Katherine Cirone, ARRO Consulting, Inc.

100 Discussion and Information Items

101 Transportation Services Division Update

102 Transportation [Trails, and Urban Centers] Division February 2016 Third Ave. Streetscape paving the way for the Coatesville Train Station Division staff continues to actively participate in the Coatesville Train Station Working Group Meeting, which convenes. PennDOT announced that it would be continuing the project through a phasing approach. As an initial phase, a streetscape project along Third Avenue between the train station and Business 30 will be advanced. The streetscape project is 90% designed and is wrapping up the Section 106 historic consultation process with the FTA and PA Historical and Museum Commission (PHMC) and is anticipated to start construction in the spring of The additional phases are as follows: Phase II Realignment of Fleetwood Street and Train Station Platforms ($20 million) Phase III Parking Garage and Buildings ($35 million) PennDOT is currently working with the engineering/development team (led by Pennoni) to advance the Third Avenue Streetscape and realignment of Fleetwood Street as soon as possible. Transportation Alternatives Program Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) applications received for the DVRPC region have been made available for subcommittee review. There were a total of 35 applications submitted in the DVRPC region (Bucks 3, Chester 5, Delaware 5, Montgomery 12, Philadelphia 11). The 5 applications received from Chester County are as follows (alphabetically by project sponsor). These proposals will be scored and ranked by Planning Commission Staff who serve on the TAP Subcommittee (Brian Styche, Bill Deguffroy). Their scores/rankings will be reviewed and approved by the management team. The County s priorities will then be compared with all 35 proposals received in the DVRPC region. At a February 12 th meeting, the ranking, selection, and funding recommendations will be decided by the TAP Subcommittee. Caln Township ADA Ramp Construction Project Sponsor: Caln Township Page 1 of 3

103 Summary: This project will complete a phased approach to upgrading pedestrian facilities in the Township by installing 51 ADA ramps. TAP Request: $200,000 Total Cost: $440,000* Woodbine Road Multi-Use Trail Sponsor: Downingtown Borough Summary: The project includes installation of a 10 wide multi-use trail along Woodbine Road and a 6 wide sidewalk along a portion of Lincoln Highway. TAP Request: $916,600 Total Cost: $1,191,600 Paoli Pike Trail, Segment C Sponsor: East Goshen Township Summary: Provide a multi-use trail on the north side of Paoli Pike with enhanced crossings at the Paoli Pike and Boot Road intersection to connect office, retail, educational, residential, recreational, and government land uses along the Paoli Pike corridor. TAP Request: $1,000,000 Total Cost: $1,600,000 Red Clay Greenway Trail Sponsor: Kennett Township Summary: The Kennett Township TAP grant request will support 5 key components that are part of the Township s Red Clay Greenway Trail transportation initiative. The Township is requesting $994,510 that will be matched by $377,97(4) from the Township. TAP Request: $994,510 Total Cost: $1,372,44 State Schoolhouse Roads Sidewalk Safety Project Sponsor: London Grove Township Summary: To construct approximately 3,000 linear feet of sidewalk along State Road & Schoolhouse Road in London Grove Township. The sidewalk on State Road will be constructed between Schoolhouse and Route 41/ Wickerton Road. Tap Request: $921,72 Total Cost: $1,510,336* *Additional clarification on local and additional funding sources is needed. Page 2 of 3

104 Preliminary planning for US 30 Bypass reconstruction and widening gets underway with municipal meetings Division staff participated in two municipal meetings concerning the future reconstruction and widening project of the US30 Coatesville Downingtown Bypass. The meetings were split into an eastern bypass section and a western bypass section. The eastern municipal meeting took place at Caln Township on January 19 th and included representatives from Caln, Downingtown, East Brandywine, East Caln, and West Brandywine. The western municipal meeting took place at Sadsbury Township on January 26 th and included representatives from Coatesville, Sadsbury, Valley, West Caln, and West Sadsbury. During the meetings, PennDOT design consultants reviewed preliminary conceptual improvement alternatives for the US30 bypass mainline and interchanges within the project area. Municipal representatives provided feedback and input which the design consultants will incorporate into future modifications of the conceptual improvement alternatives. The design consultants ultimately will be preparing a report detailing all of the improvement alternatives for the bypass reconstruction project. The next phase in the project will be preliminary engineering and the selection of preferred improvement alternatives for the mainline and interchanges. Urban Center workshop in the works With the success of the fall 2015 urban center forum, the Chester County Department of Community Development, Chester County Planning Commission, and Chester Economic Development Council will be hosting bi-annual urban center workshops in the spring and fall. In an ongoing effort to support the 16 urban centers in promoting economic development and revitalization, these workshops will be centered on specific topic areas that pose both challenges and opportunities for the urban centers. The spring workshop is tentatively scheduled for April 2016 in Kennett Square and will focus on underutilized properties and the steps municipalities need to take in order to revitalization and redevelop these properties. Multi-modal Handbook workshops Last month, a brief synopsis of the Multi-modal Handbook Outreach, Education & Implementation project was provided. The tasks for that project are: (1) conduct workshops on implementing the Multi-modal Handbook, (2) present the Multi-modal Handbook at professional conferences, (3) develop improvement plans for key bus stops in Chester County. Focusing on task 1, staff is working on scheduling and developing an agenda for three workshops to promote the use of the Multi-modal Handbook in Chester County. The preferred locations for these events have been identified as Downingtown, Kennett Square, and Phoenixville. Venues have been selected for two of the three locations. Each event will be held from :30 11:00am with coffee and light breakfast provided. Approximately 30 people per event are expected; the target audience being a mix of local elected officials, municipal staff, and consultants. These events are planned for this spring. However, the dates are to be determined and are dependent on County Commissioner and guest speaker availability. Page 3 of 3

105 Planning Services Division Update

106 Planning Services Division Ü Municipal Assistance Projects February 2016 Warwick South Coventry East Coventry Elverson Single Municipality ^_ Comprehensive Plan Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance Zoning Ordinance Recreation and Open Space Plan Multi-Modal/Trail Study Natural Resources Protection Standards Zoning/Subdivision Ordinance Updates Historic Inventory and Survey Official Map VPP In-Kind Contracts Regional Projects Longwood Gardens Cooperative Planning Project Brandywine Battlefield Strategic Landscapes Plan (NPS) Rt 30 Multi-Modal Transportation Study Kennett Area Economic Development Study Honey Brook Zoning Ordinances Update Coatesville Region Mill Trail Honey Brook Boro. Honey Brook West Caln West Sadsbury Sadsbury Penn ^_ Valley Caln Coatesville South Coatesville Modena West Bradford Newlin East Marlborough East Caln East Bradford Pocopson Kennett Kennett Square East Pikeland West Chester East Whiteland Westtown Phoenixville Schuylkill Miles Sources: Municipalities - Chester County DCIS/GIS; VPP Tracking created by CCPC, Easttown ^_

107 PLANNING SERVICES DIVISION REPORT February 2016 Planning Services Division (PSD) activities are reported under two categories: Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation. Within the Municipal Assistance summary, projects are categorized under Single Municipality or Regional/Multimunicipal. MUNICIPAL ASSISTANCE The following summarizes significant municipal assistance program activity, including Vision Partnership Program (VPP) cash and in-kind grant projects as well as projects primarily funded through outside sources (such as DCNR, NPS, etc.) as of February 1, SINGLE MUNICIPALITY 1. Caln Township Comprehensive Plan Update (2/15-1/17) The Township is updating their 2003 comprehensive plan. A number of new planning studies have been completed in the Township since 2003 and the update is intended to incorporate those plans and new recommendations into a series of manageable and implementable steps. The task force has begun to review future land use and transportation recommendations. Percent Completed: 40% Consultant: Urban Research and Development Corporation VPP Monitor: Mark Gallant/Sean O Neill 2. Easttown Township Comprehensive Plan Update (5/15-4/17) The project is taking a new approach, with minimal narrative background and a focus on issue-based plan chapters. A stakeholder workshop was held in October, and topics were identified for the issue based chapters, with a follow up meeting of the task force in November. The January and February meetings are focused on plan process and identifying issue subgroups. Percent Completed: 15% Consultant: Chester County Planning Commission VPP Planners: Kevin Myers, Sean O Neill 3. East Bradford Township Comprehensive Plan Update (4/15-3/17) The Township is updating their 2004 comprehensive plan to create a plan that is strategic, specific, and implementable. The plan will continue to focus on the Township s land and resource conservation initiatives while determining the best approach for guiding anticipated development to remaining growth areas. A first draft has been completed for review. Percent Completed: 60% Consultant: Thomas Comitta Associates VPP Monitor: Jeannine Speirs 1

108 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February East Caln Township Official Map Update (12/15-11/16) The Township will be updating their Official Map, which was last updated in The update will assist in achieving the goals of the 2012 Comprehensive Plan as well as the goals of the Central Chester County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and Brandywine Greenway Plan. The kickoff meeting was held in January and a draft map is being prepared for review. Percent Completed: 5% Consultant: Boucher & James VPP Monitor: Sean O Neill 5. East Coventry Township Trails, Greenways, and Recreation Plan (1/15-12/16) The Township is developing a strategic implementation plan focusing on open space, trails, and recreation needs and building on the recommendations of the Northern Federation Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2012). The consultant team inventoried and assessed recreation programs and facilities over the summer. A public meeting was held September 30 th to introduce the project and solicit public input. The consultant team met with the task force in mid-december to present a summary analysis and framework for the plan. Percent Completed: 55% Consultant: Natural Lands Trust and Toole Recreation Planning VPP Monitor: Brian Styche 6. East Pikeland Township Zoning Ordinance Amendments (/15-7/17) The Township will be updating their zoning ordinance with amendments that would facilitate context appropriate development and redevelopment of historic Kimberton village. A village walk took place in August, a community planning exercise was held in October, and the task force has been looking at alternative zoning district scenarios. Percent Complete: 50% Consultant: Theurkauf Design and Planning VPP Monitor: Mark Gallant 7. East Whiteland Township Comprehensive Plan Update (5/15-4/17) The Township is updating their 2001 comprehensive plan to address the many changes that have occurred in the Township over the last decade. The concept of reinventing the suburbs will be addressed in the plan with a focus on the Great Valley and the Route 30 and Route 202 corridors. Preliminary concepts, particularly related to land use and transportation, have been developed. A public information meeting was held November 17 th. A full outline of the plan was distributed in January Percent Completed: 40% Consultant: Thomas Comitta Associates VPP Monitor: Kevin Myers 2

109 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February Elverson Borough Zoning Ordinance/Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance updates (1/15-12/17) CCPC staff assisted the Borough with the update to their comprehensive plan, which was adopted in June The Borough is now proceeding with the ordinance revisions recommended in the comprehensive plan update, starting with a full update of the Zoning Ordinance, and soon transitioning into the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance. A public meeting took place September th and presented the draft changes to date, including the zoning map, uses, and area and bulk regulations. A second public information meeting will be held in April 2016 to transition between the project phases. The project lead will transition as well, from Kevin Myers to Mark Gallant. Percent Completed: 35% Consultant: Chester County Planning Commission VPP Planners: Kevin Myers/Mark Gallant, Jaime Larzelere 9. Penn Township Zoning Ordinance Update (11/15-12/17) The Township will be updating their Zoning Ordinance with the assistance of CCPC staff. The project will implement the recommendations of the 2012 Comprehensive Plan and provide an updated and streamlined ordinance. A field view with members of the task force took place in December and the first meeting of the full task force occurred in January. Percent Completed: 5% Consultant: Chester County Planning Commission VPP Monitor: Jeannine Speirs, Jaime Larzelere 10. Phoenixville Borough Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance (2/15-1/17) The Borough proposes to update their subdivision and land development ordinance. The Borough recently completed a major update of their zoning ordinance. This effort will bring the subdivision ordinance into consistency with the updated zoning regulations and will support the policies of the Borough comprehensive plan and the Phoenixville Region comprehensive plan. Percent Completed: 45% Consultant: Remington, Vernick, & Beach VPP Monitor: Justin Smiley 11. Pocopson Township Historic Resource Inventory and Survey (6/15-5/17) The Township is undertaking a township-wide inventory and survey of historic resources, a recommendation of their recent comprehensive plan. The project will include a windshield historic resource inventory update, comprehensive historic resource survey and form for 300 resources, and property searches and reports for 15 significant resources. The project will also include multiple task force meetings and two public meetings. Consultant fieldwork is ongoing to gather inventory information. Percent Completed: 15% Consultant: Jane Dorchester VPP Monitor: Jaime Larzelere 3

110 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February Schuylkill Township Freedom Trail Feasibility Study (9/14-/16) The Township is undertaking this trail study to determine the feasibility of creating a Freedom Trail connection between Valley Forge National Historic Park and the Schuylkill River Trail in the Phoenixville area. In addition to VPP funds, the project received funding from the PECO s Green Region program. The study is also examining potential connections to the Chester Valley Trail via the Patriots Path in VFNHP and to the proposed Charlestown Devault Branch Rail Trail. CCPC is currently reviewing the draft document and a public presentation is planned for February 10, Percent Completed: 5% Consultant: Gilmore & Associates, Inc. VPP Monitor: Bill Deguffroy 13. South Coventry Township Comprehensive Plan Update (9/14-/16) The Township is updating their 1996 comprehensive plan with the assistance of Chester County Planning Commission staff. Relevant elements of regional plans will be incorporated into or expanded on in the Township plan, and all required comprehensive plan elements of the MPC will be addressed. Distribution of a second draft occurred in January Percent Completed: 0% Consultant: Chester County Planning Commission VPP Planner: Mark Gallant 14. Warwick Township Ordinance Amendments (/15-7/17) The Township is undertaking zoning and SLDO amendments, specifically enhanced environmental protection regulations and design standards, to implement the recently adopted Big Woods comprehensive plan amendment. Drafts on timber harvesting, forest woodland protection, open space, and conservation of vegetation/landscaping have been reviewed by the task force. Percent Completed: 35% Consultant: Theurkauf Design and Planning VPP Monitor: Jaime Larzelere 15. West Bradford Township Natural Resource Protection and Landscaping Standards (1/15-12/16) The Township will be revising the natural resource protection and landscaping standards of their land use ordinances to bring them into consistency with the Brandywine Greenway Strategic Action Plan and Landscapes2. The consultant is working on ordinance provisions and the next meeting will be held in February Percent Completed: 40% Consultant: Brandywine Conservancy VPP Monitor: Mark Gallant 4

111 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February West Chester Borough Comprehensive Plan and Revitalization Plan Update (1/14-6/16) West Chester Borough is undertaking an update of their 2000 comprehensive plan and 2002 revitalization plan. Both plans will be incorporated into a single document. A draft plan was provided to the task force in September. A visioning process was conducted by Borough Council in September and outcomes will be incorporated in the plan. A contract extension of six months has been completed. Percent Completed: 0% Consultant: Urban Research & Development Corporation VPP Monitor: Justin Smiley 17. Westtown Township Comprehensive Plan Update (pending) The Township will be updating their Comprehensive Plan. The update will be a collaborative process to develop an overall vision to guide the Township. One focus will be how the Township should promote reinvestment and infill development within established neighborhoods and commercial corridors. Percent Completed: Contract Pending Consultant: Brandywine Conservancy and Thomas Comitta Associates VPP Monitor: Sean O Neill REGIONAL/MULTIMUNICIPAL 1. Brandywine Battlefield Strategic Landscapes Plans Phase 1 and Phase 2 (/13-12/15; /15 12/17) These projects are being funded through an American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) grant from the National Park Service. Phase 1 entails completing strategic plans for four of 13 identified strategic battlefield landscapes. Each plan includes information about: key lands and resources for planning and preservation, verification/land studies of the locations of troop movements and cultural resources, specific recommended resource protection strategies based on the Brandywine Battlefield Preservation Plan, and public access and interpretation recommendations, where appropriate. The technical report and full drafts of the three strategic landscapes plans (covering four landscapes) were submitted to the NPS in November Comments have been received on the technical report. The Phase 1 plans will be finalized following NPS review and comment. Preliminary outreach to the municipalities involved in Phase 2 of the project (New Garden, Kennett, Pennsbury, and East Marlborough townships and Kennett Square) has begun, as has the research into the 1 th century landscape by Chester County Archives. CCPC is developing an RFP for a geophysical and military historian expert consultant for the project. Percent Complete: 95% (Phase 1) 10% (Phase 2) Consultant: Chester County Planning Commission Project Planners: Jeannine Speirs, Karen Marshall 5

112 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February Coatesville Region Mill Trail Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Plan (pending) This multi-municipal effort being led by South Coatesville proposes to provide detailed analysis for the Mill Trail, including preliminary designs and specifications. Partnering municipalities include Coatesville, Modena, and Valley Township. The municipalities have selected McMahon Associates and Brandywine Conservancy and contract details are being worked through. Percent Complete: Contract Pending Consultant: McMahon Associates/Brandywine Conservancy VPP Monitor: Justin Smiley 20. Honey Brook Borough and Township Zoning Ordinances Update (pending) The Borough and Township will coordinate on an update to their individual zoning ordinances to implement multiple recommendations from their recently adopted joint Comprehensive Plan. The project will bring the ordinances into consistency with the comprehensive plan, and help them achieve economic development and rural lands preservation through collaboration. The municipalities have chosen the Brandywine Conservancy to assist them with this project. Percent Completed: Contract Pending Consultant: Brandywine Conservancy VPP Monitor: Jeannine Speirs 21. Kennett Area Economic Development Study (9/15-/17) The Borough and Township are conducting an economic development study to provide a strategy for selected geographic areas that cross municipal boundaries. The kick-off meeting took place October 16 th and included a tour of the sites being examined by the study. The consultant is proceeding with stakeholder interviews and preliminary market and demographic inventory. A public meeting will be held February 11, 2016, with a second public meeting in late March. Percent Complete: 30% Consultant: 4Ward Planning/RBA Group VPP Monitor: Kevin Myers, Sean O Neill 22. Longwood Gardens Cooperative Planning Project (10/13-12/15) The townships of East Marlborough, Kennett, and Pennsbury, along with Longwood Gardens, are working cooperatively with CCPC to facilitate communication, work through potential incompatibilities, and create updated zoning regulations to meet the needs of the townships and Longwood Gardens. East Marlborough adopted zoning amendments in November Meetings have been held with Kennett Township and Pennsbury Township throughout the spring of 2015, and a joint meeting with all stakeholders was held September 15th. CCPC staff will continue to work with Pennsbury and Kennett on their zoning amendments and a Memorandum of Agreement for the project. Percent Complete: 70% Consultant: Chester County Planning Commission Project Planner: Susan Elks 6

113 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February Western Chester County Region Route 30 Multi-Modal Transportation Study (5/15-4/17) The Western Chester County Region is undertaking a multi-modal study with a focus on the Route 30/Business 30/Amtrak Keystone Corridor one of six multi-modal corridors identified in Landscapes2. The project is funded through both a VPP grant and a TCDI grant. As a result of both the first public meeting and October task force meetings, the corridor vision and priority projects were finalized. The consultant s next steps include development of land use/transportation strategies for the interchanges and Business 30 corridor. Strategies include renderings and alternatives analysis. These will be presented at the second public information meeting, scheduled for February 29, Percent Completed: 60% Consultant: McMahon Associates VPP Monitor: Justin Smiley/Kevin Myers VPP Inquiries The municipalities listed below have made recent inquiries about VPP: 1. Atglen Borough - Comprehensive Plan update with economic development component (February 2015, June 2015) 2. Charlestown Township Comprehensive Plan (July 2015) 3. East and West Brandywine Townships Bike and Pedestrian Plan (July 2015) 4. East Vincent Township Comprehensive Plan (June 2015) 5. New Garden Township Comprehensive Plan (July 2015) 6. Phoenixville Region Comprehensive Plan (December 2015) 7. Thornbury Township Comprehensive Plan and Ordinances (June 2015). Wallace Township Regulatory Amendments (July 2015) 9. West Goshen Township Comprehensive Plan (August 2015) 10. West Sadsbury Township Comprehensive Plan (June 2015) 11. Willistown Township Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Study (July 2015) 7

114 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February 2016 HISTORIC PRESERVATION The following summarizes historic preservation activities (beyond efforts already noted within Municipal Assistance) as of February 1, Town Tours and Village Walks: Meetings are underway to begin planning 2016 s 300 Years of Ironmaking in PA celebration. All but one date is filled. 2. Brandywine Battlefield Task Force: Continue to coordinate with outside entities on the conservation and protection of properties within the battlefield, and reviewing development proposals that may negatively impact critical battlefield resources. The Steering Committee met in November. The Historic Resource and Interpretation Subcommittee met December 10 th, when Cory Kegerise from PHMC presented on the multiple property nomination process. 3. Historic Resource Mapping: Working on mapping historic resources within Easttown Township. 4. Bridge Activity: Attended a preconstruction meeting in Schuylkill Township on County Bridge #175. Bridge field reviews for the bridge protocol are scheduled for February. 5. Technical Assistance: Continue to provide support regarding Chester County Historical Society, and requests from professionals and owners regarding historic properties. Providing support regarding Birmingham Township s historic resource reviews and the Fussell House in Kennett Township. Acting as technical advisor for the East Bradford Strode s Barn subcommittee. 6. Chester County Historic Preservation Officer Activities/Reviews: Franklin: transportation project and gas line project Coatesville: Lutkins Building Landmark status and possible demolition Coatesville: Carver Court National Register nomination, eligibility determination was approved by the PHMC. Section 106 reviews: 926 bridge at Pocopson, Darlington Corners at 926/202, Paoli Train Station, Twin Bridges, and Keim Street bridge. Fricks Lock Schuylkill River Trail head development Assistance with Act 247 reviews and comprehensive planning as requested by peers 7. Marketing and County Heritage Education: Chester County Historic Preservation Network (CCHPN): Planning for 2016, to include two training workshops and the annual awards dinner for historic commissions/committees and HARBs. Iron and Steel Heritage: Conducted regional meetings and working with the National Iron and Steel Heritage Museum regarding the 2016 Town Tours and Village Walks program. Assisting Natural Lands Trust and Carol DeWolf to develop a scenic byway management plan application for Route 23 from Valley Forge National Historical Site to Elverson Borough. Quakers and the Underground Railroad: Advising the Kennett Underground Railroad Center (KURC).

115 Planning Services Division Municipal Assistance and Historic Preservation Activities February 2016 Rural History Confederation: Serve as Recording Secretary. Working with Springton Manor Farm on the Ag Museum at the park and creating interactive children s displays. Harriet Tubman Trail to Freedom: Working with the Historic Preservation Graduate Program at Delaware State University. Students are assisting with research and mapping of the proposed trail. Conducting Phase 2 review of the plan with Delaware County. Campaign of 1777 Interpretation: Initiated meeting with Chester County Historical Society, Friends of Martin s Tavern, Friends of Strode s Barn, and Brandywine Battlefield Task Force to explore funding opportunities. 9

116 Infrastructure and Plan Review

117 Year In Review 2015 Activity Summary

118 ACT 247 PROPOSALS 2015 COMPARISON OF PROPOSALS FROM 1/01 TO 12/31 COMPARISON OF LOTS/UNITS FROM 1/01 TO 12/ Single-Family Multi-Family Mobile Home Agr Com Ind Ins Totals ,343 2,539 COMPARISON OF ORDINANCE REVIEW ACTIVITY FROM Comprehensive Plans SLDO Amendments Zoning Amendments Official Map 2 3 Miscellaneous Amendment 15 7 Totals January 27, 2016

119 D Act 247 Reviews of Proposed Development 2015 Symbols Note: Excludes lot line revisions, lot consolidations, second reviews, sketch plans, and surface parking, UNLESS those reviews cited unique or significant community impacts Miles 10, , , ,001-1,200,000 Other D Livable Landscapes2 Growth Areas Rural Resource Areas Rural Center Rural Agricultural Suburban Center Suburban Urban D Mixed Use Not Consistent with Livable Landscapes Residential Lots/Units Non-Residential Square Feet

120 Proposed Lots/Units Proposed Lots/Units: Chester County, PA 14,000 12,000 12,243 11,495 11,043 11,210 10,000,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 6,726 4,352 4,467 3,99 3,732 3,475 6,036 4,993 6,425 6,019 5,719 9,402,43 7,752 6,970,590,101 3,54 3,710 3,31 2,17 1,67 4,542 3,343 2,590 2,539 0 Year Prepared By: Chester County Planning Commission (Infrastructure and Plan Review Division) January 5, 2016

121 Act 247 Reviews of Proposed Development King's Family Farms, LLC Poultry 15,200 SSF 2015 D Odessa Development 500 Units Lee Boulevard 121,575 SSF 6 Great Valley Parkway 119,977 SSF Malin Road Development 264 Units Brightview - Wayne 11,41 SSF Life Time Fitness, Inc. 176,96 SSF Great Valley Corporate Center 109,00 SSF Other D D Symbols Residential Lots/Units Non-Residential Square Feet 1-10,000 10, , ,001-1,200,000 Mixed Use Not Consistent with Livable Landscapes2 Livable Landscapes2 Growth Areas Urban Suburban Suburban Center Rural Resource Areas Agricultural Rural Rural Center Church Farm School 12,5 SSF Note: Excludes lot line revisions, lot consolidations, second reviews, sketch plans, and surface parking, UNLESS those reviews cited unique or significant community impacts. Kennett Square Specialties LLC 153,61 SSF Miles

122 Percentage of All Proposed Lots/Units in Chester County Located within Growth Area Designations of the Livable Landscapes Map % 90% 0% 70% 75% 71% 67% 75% 0% 73% 5% 9% 2% 7% 93% 60% 50% 49% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Year Prepared By: Chester County Planning Commission (Infrastructure and Plan Review Division) January 5, 2016

123 ,325,325 1,529,921 Proposed Non-Residential Structural Square Footage 3,659,04 3,47,90 2,634,433 2,763,450 4,400,000 4,249,366 4,417,23 3,735,95 3,960,000 4,72,950 3,31,017 3,494,375 2,47,076 2,39,61 2,74,23 3,317,070 2,742,361 2,755,233 4,61,344 5,935,940 5,301,291 5,10,109 4,467,90 6,751,22 7,92,02,902,349 9,229,16 10,447,567 Proposed Non-Residential Structural Square Footage: Chester County, PA 12,000,000 10,000,000,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 Year Prepared By: Chester County Planning Commission (Infrastructure and Plan Review Division) January 5, 2016

124 Percentage of Proposed Non-Residential Structural Square Footage in Chester County Located within Growth Area Designations of the Livable Landscapes Map % 90% 0% 70% 76% 0% 6% 72% 70% 7% 93% 95% 93% % 4% 60% 59% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Year Prepared By: Chester County Planning Commission (Infrastructure and Plan Review Division) January 6, 2015

125 Lots/Units,000 7,000 Proposed Single-Family/Agricultural Lots vs. Proposed Multi-Family Lots Chester County, PA Proposed Single-Family/Agricultural Lots Multifamily Lots/Units 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Year Prepared by: Chester County Planning Commission (Infrastructure and Plan Review Division) January 2, 2016

126 American Community Survey 5-Year Update

127 American Community Survey Update Key Points Summary: For the first time ever, Census data is available in 5-year increments We can use this to generate trends for the Landscapes2 update The explanation of this new data resource is VERY CONFUSING

128 American Community Survey Update ACS Background: The ACS replaced the Census long form The 5-year ACS includes municipal data The 1-year ACS only has county level data The 3-year ACS has been discontinued

129 American Community Survey Update ACS Background: The ACS program began in 2005 The first full 5-Year ACS data set included data from In 2010, the Decennial Census took place There was NO data overlap from the YR ACS and the 2010 Census

130 American Community Survey Update 5-YR ACS Cycles Every Five Years

131 American Community Survey Update ACS Unique Data Sets: The 2010 Census has NO data overlap with the 2009 ACS The 2010 Census has data overlap with the 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 ACS HOWEVER the best overlap is the 2012, because 2010 is its middle year. Thus 2012 ACS is most reflective of the 2010 Census.

132 American Community Survey Update 5-YR ACS Cycles Every Five Years

133 American Community Survey Update Two Options for comparing unique ACS sets: 1. Compare the 2012 ACS with the 2017 ACS (to be fully reported in Dec. 201) CONS: There is an odd year cycle. The actual reporting will be in Compare the 2010 ACS with the 2015 ACS (to be fully reported in Dec. 2016) PROS: 2010 ACS easily relates to 2010 Census. The five year cycle repeats in 2015.

134 American Community Survey Update Option 1 is most reflective but as accurate as Option 2. Option 2 is much easier to understand and so is preferred.

135 American Community Survey Update The Most Recent 5-YR ACS, Data is Posted at Landscapes2.org

136 American Community Survey Update Comparing 5-YR ACS, 2009 & 2014

137 American Community Survey Update Comparing the 5-YR ACS of 2009 & 2014

138 Jake Michael Demographer Chester County Planning Commission