ECOLOGY DUE DILIGENCE REPORT
|
|
- Morgan Taylor
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ECOLOGY DUE DILIGENCE REPORT Saunderton Data Centre GP Limited, Haw Lane, Saunderton November 2010 Our Ref: JSL1776-R-003 RPS Lakesbury House Hiltingbury Road Chandlers Ford Hampshire SO53 5SS Tel: Fax:
2 QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Nicholas Betson Authorised by: Craig Thomson Date: November 2010 Project Number/Document Reference: JSL1776/ Due Diligence Report DISCLAIMER The opinions and interpretations presented in this report represent our best technical interpretation of the data made available to us. However, due to the uncertainty inherent in the estimation of all parameters, we cannot, and do not guarantee the accuracy or correctness of any interpretation and we shall not, except in the case of gross or wilful negligence on our part, be liable or responsible for any loss, cost damages or expenses incurred or sustained by anyone resulting from any interpretation made by any of our officers, agents or employees. Except for the provision of professional services on a fee basis, RPS does not have a commercial arrangement with any other person or company involved in the interests that are the subject of this report. RPS cannot accept any liability for the correctness, applicability or validity for the information they have provided, or indeed for any consequential costs or losses in this regard. Our efforts have been made on a "best endeavours" basis and no responsibility or liability is warranted or accepted by RPS. COPYRIGHT RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Saunderton Data Centre GP Limited and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of Saunderton Data Centre GP Limited or RPS.
3 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION BASELINE ECOLOGY SURVEYS ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES...10
4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The development of a new data centre by Saunderton Data Centre GP Limited at Saunderton, Buckinghamshire on a former industrial site was granted planning permission in November An Environmental Statement (ES) for the development was produced by King Sturge LLP in 2008 with the ecology information based on work undertaken by Ove Arup & Partners Ltd in This in turn was based on ecology work previously completed by Enviros in 2006 (Enviros 2006). This report describes an analysis of the work completed to inform the development against good practice standards and relevant legislation/policy operating at the time to ensure it was fit for purpose. It is concluded that the work undertaken by Ove Arup & Partners Ltd in 2007 is consistent with good practice and, although undertaken over a shorter time period than would normally be recommended, is unlikely to have missed anything of material importance, given the highly developed nature of the site. The work is therefore considered to be adequate to inform the subsequent impact assessment of the development of the site. The Ecological Impact Assessment (EcIA) completed by King Sturge LLP and reported within the ES for the data centre development was undertaken according to standard guidelines, is considered to provide a robust description of impacts and offers sufficient mitigation to account for them. It goes on to provide details of significant appropriate enhancements to the site and is therefore considered to be fit for purpose and fully compliant with all legislation/policy operating at the time it was produced. Overall, the combination of the two work elements is considered to be fit for purpose and provide sufficient detail to ensure all legislation/policy is complied with during the development of the data centre at Saunderton.
5 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The development of a new data centre by Saunderton Data Centre GP Limited at Saunderton, Buckinghamshire on a former industrial site was granted planning permission in November An Environmental Statement (ES) for the development was produced by King Sturge LLP in 2008 (King Sturge LLP 2008) with the ecology information based on work undertaken by Ove Arup & Partners Ltd (hereafter referred to as the Arups Report) in 2007 (Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 2007). This in turn was based on ecology work previously completed by Enviros in 2006 (Enviros 2006). 1.2 RPS Ecology were commissioned by Saunderton Data Centre GP Limited to produce a due diligence report of the work completed by Ove Arup & Partners Ltd, along with the subsequent assessment within the ES by King Sturge LLP, to ensure that all ecological issues identified were correctly addressed according to best-practice methodologies and legislation in force at the time they were written. 1.3 This report therefore presents a brief overview of the results from each piece of work and assesses them against accepted standards and legislation/policy. Extent of site and description 1.4 The data centre site comprised mostly a mix of buildings and hard standing interspersed by occasional areas of short-mown amenity grassland, covering approximately 10 ha. 1.5 The site is located approximately half a mile to the west of the existing settlement of Saunderton on Haw Lane, accessed by vehicle via the Wycombe Road (A4010). It is set within the rolling Chiltern landscape of chalk hills and dry valleys. Outline of development proposals 1.6 The works would proceed in phases and in brief would include: Demolition of existing buildings; Construction of four data centre buildings in four distinct phases; Creation of a pond during phase 1; Planting of phase-appropriate landscape scheme; and Adoption of appropriate management within fields adjacent to the site. 1.7 A significant feature of each phase of the development is the inclusion of substantial green roofs across the majority of the roof space of each building. These are to be planted and managed as calcareous meadow, in keeping with the surrounding Chiltern countryside. Assessment criteria 1.8 The criteria against which the ecological work completed to inform the impact assessment is to be assessed includes the legislation/policy and best practice survey guidelines that were in force at the time the work was completed.
6 1.9 The principal legislation and policy to be accounted for includes: Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended; The Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000; Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006; The Conservation (Natural Habitats &c.) Regulations (1994); UK Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP); PPS9; Buckinghamshire County Structure Plan ; Wycombe District Local Plan to 2011; and Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes BAP ( ) Each element of the survey work and subsequent assessment was set against the requirements of the relevant section of legislation/policy to ensure compliance. Compliance was taken to mean that the survey/assessment, as described within the relevant report, gave due regard to the above legislation and policy Similarly, each piece of survey work was compared with the relevant accepted methodologies (as described in each section below) to ensure the assessments were based on sufficiently robust data. For example, surveys completed at the correct time of the year, using the correct level of survey effort etc. Should any element of the work be deemed not to be in accordance with these requirements, this is highlighted and corrective action to ensure compliance proposed It should also be noted that the survey work described here is over two years old, with the data search described three years old. As such, if in the future, further development were proposed, surveys to update those described here, along with a further data search from BMERC, would be required. This would ensure that the development preceded in a lawful manner, accounting for changes to protected species status, BAP species etc that may have occurred since the Arup/Enviros work was completed. Limitations 1.13 It should be noted that the assessments made here are based on the information provided in the Arups Report (2007); no ground-truthing of survey results has been possible. Therefore, if, in the process of undertaking the original survey work, something of ecological importance was missed (the presence of a Badger sett, for example), it would be beyond the scope of this report to identify that. However, every effort was made within the report to determine if any material issues were potentially missed The 2006 Enviros survey work (Enviros 2006) was not available for review and is therefore not assessed in this report. However, the work completed subsequently (by Arups and King Sturge LLP) should provide sufficient information to inform the assessment undertaken here of due diligence.
7 2 BASELINE ECOLOGY SURVEYS 2.1 This section provides an overview and assessment of each of the ecology surveys presented in the Arups Report (2007). These included: An extended Phase 1 Habitat survey; Bat survey; and Reptile survey. Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey 2.2 A walkover survey of the site was completed by an Arups ecologist on the 13 th September 2007 to map the habitats present and identify any that had potential to support protected species. The survey found the site to largely comprise buildings, hardstanding and amenity grassland with some small areas of scrub, immature broad-leaved woodland and semi-improved calcareous grassland. A small, artificial concrete water body was also noted as present. 2.3 Although not stated as such within the report, the description of habitats and associated field map demonstrate that the survey was apparently completed according to accepted best-practice methods (JNCC 2003). 2.4 The timing of the survey in mid September is within the standard habitat survey season (April to September), although, as acknowledged in the Arups Report, some species etc may not have been visible at the time of survey. This limitation is present for all botanical surveys and, from the detail provided, is not considered to have impacted on the final definition of habitats given within the report. 2.5 The assessment of the relative conservation importance of the habitats notes that the majority of those present within the site are of little ecological value, beyond those of semi-natural origin (the calcareous grassland, for example), all of which are to be retained within the final development. The assessment goes on to provide potential enhancement measures, in accordance with PPS9, to further the aims of both UK and Buckinghamshire & Milton Keynes BAP (provision of ponds and increased areas of calcareous grassland). 2.6 As well as classifying the habitats present, the survey sought to identify those features of the site that had potential to support protected or otherwise notable species. From this, further surveys for bats and reptiles were recommended and the potential presence of breeding birds within vegetation noted. The potential for protected or rare amphibians within the water body recorded on site was discounted on the basis of that the habitat was not suitable, lacking sufficient vegetation. 2.7 From the information presented in the report, it is considered the conclusions were justified and, given the information presented in the Arups Report, the recommended further surveys the only ones necessary to fully inform an impact assessment of the development. 2.8 It is therefore concluded that the Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey conducted by Arups was undertaken at an appropriate time of year to recognised standards and that the further work/assessment of conservation significance is supported by the evidence presented.
8 Bat surveys 2.9 The Bat survey presented in the Arups Report comprised an inspection of the interior roof voids of two buildings identified as having potential to support bat roosts and emergence/activity surveys within the wider site. The surveys did not identify any roost within the buildings to be demolished but did note bat activity (foraging and commuting) along the boundary with Haw Lane and the southern site boundary. No activity was identified within the majority of the (developed) site All bat surveys were noted in the Arups Report as being undertaken according to the best practice guidelines; Bat Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature 2004) and Bat Surveys; Good Practice Guidelines (BCT 2007). The survey methodology, as described, for both internal inspections and emergence/activity surveys is consistent with this statement The internal inspections were carried out on the 24 th September Such surveys can be completed at any time of the year The emergence/activity surveys were completed on the 13 th and 24 th September 2007 with a dawn swarming survey on the 25 th September. This survey effort is in accordance with good practice guidelines for a site of this nature (highly developed and therefore low potential) requiring three survey visits (including a dusk/dawn within one 24 hour period) Although the survey guidelines state that the period for such surveys is between March and September, the optimum period of activity is between June and August (BCT 2007). However, given the low quality nature of much of the site for bat foraging/commuting it is considered that this is unlikely to have compromised the findings of the survey The assessment of the importance of the site for bats takes account of the relevant legislation and acknowledges that some short-term impacts to bats using the site are possible during the construction phase from increased activity on site. However, the report also provides suitable enhancement suggestions to ensure that, in the long-term, the quality of the site is improved for bats Although the emergence/activity surveys were conducted outside of the optimum period, it is concluded that this is not likely to have materially impacted the results (given the low quality habitat available on the majority of the site). The survey work in relation to bats is therefore considered to have been completed to a suitable standard and it is concluded therefore that the assessment of the impacts on bats is sufficiently robust. Reptile surveys 2.16 The reptile surveys completed on site presented in the Arups Report assessed the semi-natural fringes of the site, as identified during the Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey. No reptiles were recorded as being present within the areas surveyed The Arups Report stated that the methodology for the reptile surveys followed that of standard guidelines (Froglife 1999, Gent & Gibson 1998 and HGBI 1998). Methodologies described in the Arups Report support this Although surveys for reptiles can often be undertaken until mid-late October, depending on the weather conditions, and September is considered to be an optimum time as young reptiles will
9 be active enough to be detected, it is generally recommended that the period over which the survey is undertaken is extended as long as possible (Froglife 1999), thereby allowing time for any reptiles present to find the refugia. Therefore, only allowing five days between laying the refugia in the field and the start of surveys, combined with undertaking the surveys over seven consecutive days means that the survey took less than two weeks to complete. While this is still compliant with the requirements of the standard guidelines and, as described in the report, any substantial population present is likely to have been detected, it may be that a small population may not have been recorded However, those areas of habitat that may support such small populations are being retained within the final development and landscape measures suggested provide enhanced habitat for reptiles overall. Therefore, it is considered that the conclusions within the Arups Report will not have been impacted by this short survey period. Background data search 2.20 A background data search from the Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes Environmental Records Centre (BMERC) had been undertaken previously by Enviros in 2006 (Enviros 2006). This was reported again within the Arups Report. The government website Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside (MAGIC) and Natural England website Nature on the Map were also consulted to provide information on local designated sites The range of sources consulted is consistent with good practice in ascertaining existing background ecological data to inform impact assessment. Although no update was compiled for the Arups 2007 report, it is considered that this will not have impacted the final conclusions within this report.
10 3 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 3.1 The ecological impact assessment (EcIA) undertaken by King Sturge LLP and presented in the ecology chapter of the ES for the data centre was based on the site work undertaken by Arups which in turn updated that completed by Enviros in It presented an assessment of the impact of the development of the data centre on the ecology on and around the Haw Lane site. Consultation 3.2 Along with the data presented within the Arups Report, the EcIA presented consultations with a range of statutory and non-statutory bodies including: Natural England; Environment Agency; RSPB; Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Board; National Trust; Wildlife Trust; Berkshire and South Buckinghamshire Bat Group; North Bucks Bat Group; and Wycombe Wildlife Group. 3.3 Responses from the consultation exercise are included within the final ecology chapter and have been incorporated, where relevant into the final EcIA. 3.4 The range of bodies contacted is consistent with good practice in ascertaining a sufficient level of background detail and the views of relevant stakeholders. Impact assessment 3.5 The King Sturge LLP EcIA states that it was completed according to the Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom (IEEM 2006). This involves assigning a value to an ecological resource within the site dependent on a range of factors such as geographic frame of reference, biodiversity value etc. The impact assessment then considers the potential impacts and effects to each resource (negative/positive, magnitude etc) and the significance of that impact based on the size/value of the resource, the duration of the effect etc. Finally, potential mitigation/enhancement is presented to reduce/avoid any negative impacts identified. 3.6 The methodology used to complete the EcIA is consistent with standard industry good practice and the evidence relating to how this methodology was applied to the data centre development presented within the ecology chapter supports this. 3.7 From the data collected by Arups, the following ecological resources (with the assigned ecological value shown in parenthesis) were identified on or near the site:
11 Bradenham Woods, Park Wood and the Coppice Site of Special Scientific Interest (National); Hearton Wood County Wildlife Site (Regional); Locally designated sites (County and Regional); Bats (foraging and commuting) (Local); Birds (District); and Significant Habitat Features (Local). 3.8 The rationale behind the selection of these resources and their respective value, although not presented in detail within the chapter, is logical and accounts for the ecological features found on site during the Arup / Enviros surveys. 3.9 The subsequent assessment of effects and significance accounts for both the construction and operational phases. Each resource is dealt with in turn and a coherent description of the potential for impacts as a result of the development and its significance is presented. The impact assessment and the manner in which each resource is dealt with is consistent with good practice and is considered to appropriately describe the potential impacts to ecology of the development Potential mitigation to minimise/eliminate those impacts is also presented along with future enhancement. This includes: The implementation of an appropriate lighting regime to avoid impacts to bats; Clearance of vegetation outside of the breeding bird season; Protection of retained vegetation to ensure continuity of bird nesting habitat; The creation and implementation of a full landscape and ecology strategy and management plan for the site to ensure habitats are managed for biodiversity benefit; Creation of ponds as part of drainage management; Reinforcement of hedgerows; Creation of calcareous grassland green roofs on all four of the data centre buildings; and Management of two adjacent fields to encourage their reversion to calcareous grassland The range of mitigation proposed is considered to adequately account for the impacts described and therefore ensure that the overall direct impact of the development on ecology is negligible. The range of enhancement measures, taken on top of the mitigation, is considered sufficient to provide an overall increase in the biodiversity value of the site, in line with government policy Overall, it is considered that the EcIA completed by King Sturge LLP presented within the ecology chapter of the ES for the data centre development is consistent with good practice. It provides a robust description and analysis of impacts including sufficient mitigation/enhancement to ensure the overall development provides a net gain for biodiversity in the area.
12 4 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 The work relating to ecology undertaken to inform the development of the data centre at Saunderton has been reviewed for consistency with good practice and compliance with legislation/policy. 4.2 From the information available, it is concluded that the survey work and background data search undertaken by Arups in 2007 is consistent with good practice. Although the reptile survey was undertaken over a relatively shorter time period than would normally be recommended, this is unlikely to have missed anything of material importance. The work is therefore considered to be adequate to inform the subsequent impact assessment of the development of the site. 4.3 From the information available, the EcIA completed by King Sturge LLP and reported within the ES for the data centre development was undertaken according to standard guidelines and is considered to provide a robust description of impacts and offers sufficient mitigation to account for them. It goes on to provide details of significant enhancements to the site and is therefore considered to be fit for purpose and fully compliant with relevant legislation/policy.
13 5 REFERENCES Bat Conservation Trust (2007) Bat Surveys- Good Practice Guidelines. Bat Conservation Trust, London. English Nature (2004) Bat Mitigation Guidelines. English Nature, Peterborough. Enviros (2006) Extended Phase 1 Habitat Report. Enviros. London. Froglife (1999) Reptile survey: an introduction to planning, conducting and interpreting surveys for snake and lizard conservation. Froglife Advice Sheet 10. Froglife. Halesworth. Gent T. & Gibson S. (1998) Herpetofauna Worker s Manual. JNCC, Peterborough. Herpetofauna Groups of Britain and Ireland (HGBI) (1998) Evaluating local mitigation/translocation programmes: Maintaining best practice and lawful standards. HGBI advisory notes for ARGs. HGBI c/o Froglife, Halesworth. IEEM (2006) Guidelines for Ecological Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom. IEEM, Winchester. JNCC (2003) Handbook for Phase 1 habitat survey a technique for environmental audit. JNCC Peterborough. King Sturge LLP (2008) Molins Site Haw Lane, Saunderton: Environmental Statement. King Sturge LLP, London. Ove Arup & Partners (2007) e-shelter Saunderton: Baseline Ecology Report. Ove Arup & Partners, London.
Dormouse Method Statement
, Northamptonshire A Report on behalf of April 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Method Statement 1.2 Site Background 1.3 Dormouse Ecology & Legal Protection 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Tool Box
More informationECOLOGICAL ADVICE SERVICE
ECOLOGICAL ADVICE SERVICE TO: FROM: Guy Wilson Marie Thibault DATE: 11 th August 2016 SUBJECT: CA/16/01502/FUL / Land adjoining Goose Farm, Canterbury Thank you for requesting advice on this application
More informationWingerworth, Chesterfield. February Surveyor: James Porter
Report Wingerworth, Chesterfield February 2014 Surveyor: James Porter (Natural England Licence Number: CLS00241 Contents Contents Notice to readers 1.0 Introduction Background Information Site Description
More informationPlanning Application 13/00952/FULLS at Ampfield Hill, Romsey, Test Valley: Great Crested Newt Survey Following on From Ecological Assessment
10 June 2014 Mr Allan Clark esq Ampfield Parish Council Blue Haze Ampfield Hill Ampfield Romsey SO51 9BD By email only Our Ref: P13/46 Dear Mr Clark Planning Application 13/00952/FULLS at Ampfield Hill,
More informationNeighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces
Neighbourhood Planning Local Green Spaces Introduction... 2 1. Why green space is important... 4 2. Neighbourhood plans and green space... 6 3. Evidence... 8 Statutory designations... 9 Green space audit...
More informationA16 Ecology: Application 2 - LBHF
A16 Ecology: Application 2 - LBHF Addendum to the Environmental Statement Volume I January 2012 Introduction A16.1 This Chapter of the Addendum to the June 2011 Environmental Statement (ES) (hereafter
More informationProposed Residential Development at Church Stile Farm in Cradley, Herefordshire. Hazel Dormouse Surveys
Proposed Residential Development at Church Stile Farm in Cradley, Herefordshire A report to: Terra Strategic BSL Strategic Ltd. 2 The Courtyard 707 Warwick Road Solihull B91 3DA By: Udall-Martin Associates
More informationStatutory and Non-Statutory Designated Sites and Ecology
Statutory and Non-Statutory Designated Sites and Ecology The National Planning Policy Framework considers the conservation and enhancement of the natural environment in chapter 11 paragraphs 109-119, where
More informationLand at Whiteditch Lane, Newport, Essex
Land at Whiteditch Lane, Newport, Essex Ecology Report Produced for Sworders Agricultural By March 2013 Document Control: Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 0.1 01.03.2013
More informationCLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL STIRLING - ALLOA - KINCARDINE RAILWAY (ROUTE RE- OPENING) AND LINKED IMPROVEMENTS (SCOTLAND) BILL
CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL STIRLING - ALLOA - KINCARDINE RAILWAY (ROUTE RE- OPENING) AND LINKED IMPROVEMENTS (SCOTLAND) BILL GREAT CRESTED NEWT SURVEY REPORT JUNE 2003 Scott Wilson (Scotland) Ltd Contact:
More information15.0 ECOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION
15.0 ECOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION Introduction 15.1 This chapter of the ES assesses the likely significant effects of the Overall Development in terms of and is supported by Appendices 15.1 to 15.9.
More informationWildlife and Planning Guidance: Neighbourhood Plans
Wildlife and Planning Guidance: Neighbourhood Plans This Leaflet is one of a series of 4 Wildlife and Planning Guidance Leaflets and is intended to provide useful information to assist you to campaign
More informationCotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines. June 2016
Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines June 2016 Cotswolds AONB Landscape Strategy and Guidelines Introduction The evolution of the landscape of the Cotswolds AONB is a result of the interaction
More informationEnvironmental Assessment (Scotland) Act 2005: Clackmannanshire Council Sustainability Strategy Scoping Request
TAYSIDE & CLACKMANNANSHIRE Tel: 01738 458582(direct line) Fax: 01738 458616 e-mail addresses: denise.reed@snh.gov.uk Niall Urquhart Team Leader Sustainability Clackmannanshire Council Kilncraigs Greenside
More informationCriteria for the Selection of SINCs in the Mid-Valleys Area
Criteria for the Selection of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation in the County Boroughs of Blaenau Gwent, Caerphilly, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhondda Cynon Taff (the Mid-Valleys Area ) Prepared by
More informationLand at Rampton Road. Cottenham
Land at Rampton Road Cottenham Introduction TEP is preparing an outline planning application for 54 dwellings on 6.9 hectares of land adjacent to Rampton Road, Cottenham on behalf of the owners Cambridgeshire
More informationPreliminary Ecological Appraisal
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Seminar Outline What is Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA)? What are the main objectives of PEA? Methods of PEA Wildlife legislation and planning policy Examples of
More informationInterim Advice Note 76 / 06 ASSESSMENT PART 1 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. Contents
Interim Advice Note 76 / 06 VOLUME 11 SECTION 1: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION PART 1 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Contents 1. Introduction and Application 2. Aims and Objectives
More informationTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED).
FAO: D. Williams Isle of Anglesey County Council Council Offices Llangefni Anglesey LL77 7TW 16 November 2017 DCRM Ref. No: WN0904-QUD-OS-LET-00002_English Dear Mr Williams TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT
More informationHRA PLANNING Chartered Town Planning and Environmental Consultants
HRA PLANNING Chartered Town Planning and Environmental Consultants Screening Statement for the Purposes of Determining the need for Appropriate Assessment Proposed development of 74 no. residential units
More informationLand at Porch Farm, Kingsclere Ecology Briefing Paper, April 2016 C_EDP3343_01a
C_EDP3343_01a Introduction 1.1 This Ecology Briefing Paper has been prepared by The Environmental Dimension Partnership Ltd (EDP) on behalf of Linden Homes. This briefing paper considers the ecological
More informationPlumpton Neighbourhood Development Plan Revised Pre Submission Document - Regulation 14 Consultation
REPRESENTATIONS... Plumpton Parish Council Plumpton Neighbourhood Development Plan Revised Pre Submission Document - Regulation 14 Consultation Representations submitted on behalf of: Cala Homes (South
More informationGrantham Southern Quadrant Link Road Environmental Statement
Grantham Southern Quadrant Link Road Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary Introduction Lincolnshire County Council (LCC) is submitting a planning application for the proposed implementation of
More informationApplicant: Mr C Fletcher Agent: Ms B Stala Case Officer: Sally Smith (HBC) Jill Lee (WCC) Ward: Stakes Parish Southwick and Widley
Site Address: Berewood Phase 2 Development Site, London Road, Purbrook, Waterlooville Proposal: Reserved Matters Application for landscaping of Phase A of the Town Park (under Condition 6(i)d)), together
More informationBarvills Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
Barvills Solar Farm Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary 13 March 2015 Produced for Prepared by St John s House Queen Street, Manchester M2 5JB Contents Contents... 2 1 Introduction... 3 1.1 Development
More informationOxford Green Belt Study. Summary of Final Report Prepared by LUC October 2015
Oxford Green Belt Study Summary of Final Report Prepared by LUC October 2015 Project Title: Oxford Green Belt Study Client: Oxfordshire County Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by
More informationReplacement Golf Course Facilities and Residential Development, Churston. Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary
Replacement Golf Course Facilities and Residential Development, Churston Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary July 2011 Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey s map with the permission of the Controller
More informationABBEY MANOR GROUP/SAINSBURY S SUPERMARKETS LTD
ABBEY MANOR GROUP/SAINSBURY S SUPERMARKETS LTD Mixed Use Development including Business Park and Foodstore Land at Bunford Park, Bunford Lane, Yeovil Environmental Statement: Non-Technical Report June
More informationBREEDON NORTHERN LIMITED
Non Technical Summary CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 SITE DESCRIPTION... 1 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT... 6 4 NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT... 8 5 KEY ISSUES CONSIDERED IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...
More informationComments on the proposed scope are requested from WCC/NBBC officers to be provided to SLC Rail by 25 th March 2016 and sent to
Introduction WCC have indicated that in advance of the surveys and assessments being undertaken consultation should be undertaken with technical officers of both Warwickshire CC and Nuneaton and Bedworth
More informationUniversity Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011
University Park, Worcester Non Technical Summary December 2011 Introduction UW Wrenbridge LLP, a Joint Venture Company of the University of Worcester and Wrenbridge Land Ltd (the Applicants ) intend to
More informationDEFGH. Crystal Place Park. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Elin Thomas and Emily Low Waterman Environmental
DEFGH Crystal Place Park Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Elin Thomas and Emily Low Waterman Environmental 10.12.07 EIA Presentation Content What is EIA? Legal Requirements Process Q&A Key Topics
More informationBasic Habitat Survey Tabernacle Gardens, Pembroke
Basic Habitat Survey Tabernacle Gardens, Pembroke Produced by The Wildlife Trust of South and West Wales Contact Ecologist: Position: Nathan Walton Wildlife Trust Officer Registered Office: Wildlife Trust
More informationEbbsfleet Development Corporation
Title of Paper Planning and Housing Delivery Report September 2018 Presented by Sub-Committee Mark Pullin, Chief Planning Officer Planning Committee Purpose of Paper and Executive Summary This paper provides
More informationStrategic Environmental Assessment Screening Report. Dublin Port Masterplan Review 2017
Strategic Environmental Assessment Screening Report Dublin Port Masterplan Review 2017 Table of Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Purpose of the Masterplan... 2 3 Task 1.1 Pre-Screening Check... 5 4 Task
More informationHabitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Determination. May 2017
Cholsey Parish Council Cholsey Neighbourhood Plan Habitat Regulations Assessment (HRA) Screening Determination May 2017 Cholsey Neighbourhood Plan Page! 1 of! 10 SASR - HRA v1.1 Page Left Intentionally
More informationParish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Parish of Repton NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN BASIC CONDITIONS STATEMENT December 2018 CEF 4 Legal Requirements This statement has been produced by the NDP Working Group on behalf of Repton Parish Council
More information3. Neighbourhood Plans and Strategic Environmental Assessment
1. Introduction This report sets out a draft Screening Determination for the Preston Parish Council s Neighbourhood Plan and has been prepared by rth Hertfordshire District Council. The purpose of the
More informationWatford Local Plan Part 2 Publication Stage Environmental Report. Appendix 3: Consultation Comments
Watford Local Plan Part 2 Publication Stage Environmental Report Appendix 3: Consultation Comments August 2016 Appendix 3 - Responses to Consultation of the Local Plan Part 2 As required by the SEA Directive,
More informationVelindre Cancer Centre Environmental Statement Vol.1: Environmental Statement Text. Chapter 1: Introduction
Velindre Cancer Centre Environmental Statement Vol.1: Environmental Statement Text Chapter 1: Introduction Draft - March 2017 Prepared by: Address: Email: Website: Mott McDonald, The Urbanists and HLM
More informationWildlife and Planning Guidance: Local Plans
Wildlife and Planning Guidance: Local Plans This Leaflet is one of a series of 4 Wildlife and Planning Guidance Leaflets and is intended to provide useful information to assist you to campaign effectively
More informationGUILDFORD BOROUGH GREEN BELT AND COUNTRYSIDE STUDY
GUILDFORD BOROUGH GREEN BELT AND COUNTRYSIDE STUDY Volume II - Addendum On behalf of Guildford Borough Council PPG Ref : BNL.0287 April 2014 COPYRIGHT The conents of this document must not be copied or
More informationA payment of 1080 is due in this instance, for a meeting and follow up written response, and will be made by card over the phone.
JPPC ref: AG/6002 18 th September 2014 Planning Services Vale of White Horse District Council Benson Lane Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford OX10 8ED Dear Sir/Madam REQUEST FOR PRE-APPLICATION ADVICE RE: RESIDENTIAL
More informationLANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT
THE COUNTY DURHAM LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT FOREWORD The landscape of County Durham is one of great contrast and diversity. From the North Pennines in the west to the Durham Coast in the east it contains
More informationHigh Speed Rail (London- West Midlands)
High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Draft Environmental Minimum Requirements Annex 3: Draft Heritage Memorandum November 2013 ESA 4.4 High Speed Rail (London- West Midlands) Draft Environmental Minimum
More informationOVERVIEW OF PLANNING POLICY AND PROCEDURE RELATING TO BIODIVERSITY IN ENGLAND
OVERVIEW OF PLANNING POLICY AND PROCEDURE RELATING TO BIODIVERSITY IN ENGLAND Disclaimer: This document is a guide to legislation and procedure relating to biodiversity in England. It is offered to readers
More informationvolume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08
DESIGN MANUAL FOR ROADS AND BRIDGES volume 11 environmental assessment section 2 environmental impact assessment Part 7 ha 218/08 glossary of terms Used in DMRB Volume 11, Sections 1 and 2 SUMMARY This
More informationChapter 4. Route Window C12: Mile End Park and Eleanor Street Shafts
Chapter 4 Route Window C12: Mile End Park and Eleanor Street Shafts 48 Crossrail Amendment of Provisions 4 Route Window C12: Mile End Park and Eleanor Street Shafts Location plan of Mile End Park and Eleanor
More informationStatement of Community Involvement LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE
LAND OFF SOUTHDOWN ROAD HORNDEAN, HAMPSHIRE CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Pre-application Discussions 4 3. The Consultation Process 5 4. Consultation Feedback 7 5. Responses to Consultation Feedback
More informationResponse by The Dartington Hall Trust
Consultation Response by The Dartington Hall Trust Site Reference: SH_39_02_08/13 Contents Introduction 1 Site Description 2 Development Proposal and Context 3 Site Technical Assessment 4 Planning Policy
More informationLocation: The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire, Lings House, Billing Lings, Northampton NN3 8BE
Role Description Role Title: Volunteer Conservation Officer Location: The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire, Lings House, Billing Lings, Northampton NN3 8BE Accountable
More informationHS2 Hybrid Bill Petitioning. Summary of SMBC Asks 23/09/13. Background
Summary of SMBC Asks 23/09/13 Background The Council has a developed a significant number of asks and propositions for consideration by HS2 Ltd and Government throughout further development of the HS2
More informationPolicy DM19: Development and Nature Conservation
Avonmouth Wetland Habitat Project October 2010 and December 2011 (the Cresswell study). Policy Links Bristol Local Plan Core Strategy Lead Policy BCS4: Avonmouth and Bristol Port BCS9: Green Infrastructure
More informationWard: Southbourne. Outline application with all matters reserved. Erection of 5 no. dwellings and associated works.
Parish: Southbourne Ward: Southbourne SB/16/00205/OUT Proposal Site Outline application with all matters reserved. Erection of 5 no. dwellings and associated works. Dunkirk South Lane Southbourne Emsworth
More informationUTT/17/2075/FUL - (BERDEN) (Referred to Committee by Councillor Janice Loughlin. Reason: In the Public Interest)
UTT/17/2075/FUL - (BERDEN) (Referred to Committee by Councillor Janice Loughlin. Reason: In the Public Interest) PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Amendments to the design of a scheme for a 49.99MW battery
More informationbuilding with nature - a new benchmark for green infrastructure
building with nature - a new benchmark for green infrastructure Danielle Sinnett, Gemma Jerome, Sarah Burgess, Nick Smith and Roger Mortlock outline the aims, development and proposed operation of Building
More informationSTATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND (CD/H01) LAND ADJ A385 TOTNES ROAD COLLATON ST MARY APPEAL REFERENCE: APP/X1165/A/14/
STATEMENT OF COMMON GROUND (CD/H01) LAND ADJ A385 TOTNES ROAD COLLATON ST MARY APPEAL REFERENCE: APP/X1165/A/14/2214154 APPEAL BY TAYLOR WIMPEY (EXETER) LIMITED LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY TORBAY COUNCIL
More informationLAND AT WEST YELLAND. Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Welbeck Strategic Land LLP
LAND AT WEST YELLAND Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Welbeck Strategic Land LLP May 2014 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft FINAL Date
More informationWhat now for home building?
Successful Partners DELIVERING QUALITY 2017 Residential Seminar What now for home building? The post Brexit world May 2017 Successful Partners DELIVERING QUALITY 2017 Residential Seminar 30 March 2017
More informationROCHFORD LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment. Rochford Core Strategy Preferred Options Document
ROCHFORD LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK: Sustainability Appraisal/ Strategic Environmental Assessment Non Technical Summary Rochford Core Strategy Preferred Options Document October 2008 SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL
More informationHS2 Environment. Protecting the environment
HS2 Environment Protecting the environment Approach to mitigation EIA Regulations require an ES to include a description of the measures envisaged in order to avoid, reduce and, if possible, remedy significant
More informationPeter Brett Associates LLP (PBA) act on behalf of db symmetry ltd in respect of the proposed symmetry park, Kettering development (the Site).
Our ref: 30062 2 nd August 2017 Kettering Borough Council Planning Department Municipal Offices Bowling Green Rd Kettering NN15 7QX 61 Oxford Street Manchester M1 6EQ T: +44 (0)161 245 8900 E: manchester@peterbrett.com
More informationCALA Homes is preparing a planning application for a development of up to 36 new homes, including a mix of properties to meet local demand.
WELCOME Welcome to this public consultation event for our proposed development on land to the south of Twelve Leys in Wingrave. Thank you for taking the time to come along today. Homes is preparing a planning
More information(In relation to the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 and the Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011)
Midlothian Council 2 nd Biodiversity Duty Report - November 2017 (In relation to the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 and the Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011) 1. Introductory
More informationSouth Macclesfield Development Area Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary March 2017
South Macclesfield Development Area Environmental Statement March 2017 Contents 1.0 Introduction... 2 1.1 Background... 2 1.2 Environmental Assessment... 2 1.3 Site Description... 2 2.0 The Proposals...
More informationDEACON LANDSCAPES, WOOTON, KENT ECOLOGY DORMOUSE SURVEY ISSUE 1 NOVEMBER 2015
DEACON LANDSCAPES, WOOTON, KENT ECOLOGY DORMOUSE SURVEY ISSUE 1 NOVEMBER 2015 Landscape Architects Ecology & Environment Masterplanning Arboriculture Historic Landscapes ISSUE NO. AUTHOR CHECKED BY DATE
More informationSouth Macclesfield Development Area, Phase 1 Environmental Statement Non- Technical Summary. For Engine of the North
South Macclesfield Development Area, Phase 1 Environmental Statement Non- Technical Summary For Engine of the North April 2015 Contents Contents 3 1 Introduction 1 2 The Proposals 5 3 Alternative Options
More informationBiodiversity Standard
14 Sustainability Service + This is a controlled document whilst viewed at https://universityofleeds.myeqms.com/login/login.aspx. Once downloaded or printed it becomes an uncontrolled copy. Please check
More informationNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
Proposed Sand and Gravel Extraction and Associated Processing Operations with Restoration to a Mixture of Agriculture and Nature Conservation including Areas of Shallow Water at Hedgeley, Northumberland
More informationAECOM Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report 64
AECOM Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report 64 14 Conclusions It can be concluded from the scoping report that the following topics should be scoped in
More informationRef: A073350/SM/sm Date: 13 September 2013
Ref: A073350/SM/sm Date: 13 September 2013 Ian Parkinson Development Control Team Leader Planning Portsmouth City Council Civic Offices Guildhall Square Portsmouth PO1 2AY Dear Ian LIGHT & GLEAVE VILLA
More informationChalk, Cherries and Chairs Central Chilterns Landscape Partnership Scheme LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT OFFICER JOB INFORMATION PACK
Chalk, Cherries and Chairs Central Chilterns Landscape Partnership Scheme LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT OFFICER JOB INFORMATION PACK How to apply Please complete our application form, together with
More informationNON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY THE HIDE, BISHOP AUCKLAND PROPOSED ECO CHALET DEVELOPMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY 1 Introduction 1.1.1 This non-technical summary for the (ES) prepared in relation to the proposed eco-chalet
More informationAbout 10% of the Borough's population lives in the seven rural parishes. Population figures from the 1991 census are given below:-
8. THE DISTRICT VILLAGES 8.1 Population About 10% of the Borough's population lives in the seven rural parishes. Population figures from the 1991 census are given below:- Village No. of Persons Cottingham
More informationEnvironmental Impact Assessment for Waterway Restoration Projects. Chris John, Technical Director Ecus Ltd.
Environmental Impact Assessment for Waterway Restoration Projects Chris John, Technical Director Ecus Ltd. Environmental Impact Assessment for Waterway Restoration Projects What is Environmental Impact
More informationSouth Whitehaven, Cumbria EIA
South Whitehaven, Cumbria EIA Environmental Statement - Non Technical Summary June 2013 in association with 1. Introduction Story Homes is applying to Copeland Borough Council (CBC) for a new residential
More informationSHORELINE, FLOOD AND COASTAL DEFENCE MANAGEMENT PLANS
These plans may provide opportunities as well as concern for recreational boating. They are currently being revised and consulted on. This document explains how we can engage in the process. Shoreline,
More informationSouth West Nature Map - A Planners Guide
South West Nature Map - A Planners Guide Helping to Shape Spatial Planning for Biodiversity in Local Development Frameworks Working together for wildlife CONTENTS Foreword 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose
More informationSustainability Statement. Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan
Sustainability Statement Whitby Business Park Area Action Plan November 2014 Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Scoping 3 3. Sustainability Appraisal of Options 6 4. Assessment of Draft Area Action Plan
More informationEnvironmental Impact Assessment
Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is the process of systematically drawing together an assessment of the likely significant environmental effects of a development project.
More informationProposed S.U.E. Drayton Fields Industrial Estate. Royal Oak Industrial Estate. Daventry Town Centre. Long Marsh Industrial Estate.
local context and amenities Existing Local Facilities Nearby Education Facilities in Daventry Local Retail Welton C of E Primary School Well Lane, Welton. This is a mixed sex rural primary school and has
More informationMid Suffolk District Council Planning Control Department 131 High Street Needham Market IP6 8DL
Mid Suffolk District Council Planning Control Department 131 High Street Needham Market IP6 8DL OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION Town and Country Planning Act 1990 THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT
More informationResponse by The Dartington Hall Trust
Consultation Response by The Dartington Hall Trust Site Reference: (T6 in DPD) 14_56/2246/13/f Contents Introduction 1 Site Description 2 Development Proposal and Context 3 Site Technical Assessment 4
More informationCONSULTATION RESPONSE. Application for approval of reserved matters for Phase 2 Landscaping pursuant to outline planning application 05/00291/MKPCO
CONSULTATION RESPONSE ITEM 7 Application Number: 12/00677/MKPCR Application for approval of reserved matters for Phase 2 Landscaping pursuant to outline planning application 05/00291/MKPCO AT Area 10,
More informationTHE NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL (SOUTH BRISTOL LINK CLASSIFIED ROAD) SIDE ROADS ORDER 2013 THE NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL (SOUTH BRISTOL LINK)
NSC/6/1 THE NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL (SOUTH BRISTOL LINK CLASSIFIED ROAD) SIDE ROADS ORDER 2013 THE NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL (SOUTH BRISTOL LINK) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2013 THE NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL (SOUTH
More informationE16: MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS
HIGH SPEED TWO INFORMATION PAPER E16: MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS This paper outlines the proposed approach to the maintenance of landscaped areas created for HS2 Phase One. It will be of particular
More informationLand to the North of Main Road, Wybunbury
Land to the North of Main Road, Wybunbury Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary November 2014 Land to the North of Main Road, Wybunbury Environmental Statement Non-Technical Summary Prepared on
More informationTOPIC PAPER 2: Links to other sustainability tools
TOPIC PAPER 2: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Landscape Character Assessment can inform a range of other sustainability tools and methodologies. Equally these other tools may assist in reaching decisions concerning
More informationTandridge Local Plan Assessing the Ecological Suitability of 183 sites considered for development Tandridge District Council, Surrey
Tandridge Local Plan Assessing the Ecological Suitability of 183 sites considered for development Tandridge District Council, Surrey PLANNING I DESIGN I ENVIRONMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION TEP conducted Site
More information7 Scoping and Introduction to the Assessments
7 Scoping and Introduction to the Assessments 7.1 Scope of the assessments 7.1.1 Rule 8 of the TWR makes provision for an applicant to request a scoping opinion from the SoS indicating the information
More informationPlanning Area Committee 25 June 2018 Addendum to Officers Report RESTRICTION OF PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS - EXTENSIONS
Planning Area Committee 25 June 2018 Addendum to Officers Report 17/8150/RMA West Hendon Regeneration Area (Phase 6) Pages 11 54 The conditions section shall be changed as follows: RESTRICTION OF PERMITTED
More informationSchedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date:
Schedule of Planning Applications Committee Date: 23 May 2018 Reference: 06/17/0726/F Parish: Hemsby Officer: Mr J Beck Expiry Date: 22-05-2018 Applicant: Proposal: Site: Mr Gillett Change of use to the
More informationLONDON BRIDGE STATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY
LONDON BRIDGE STATION ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY June 2011 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS Page 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 The Site 4 3 THE DEVELOPMENT 3.1 What is it? 5 3.2
More informationDemolition of The Suffolk Punch Public House and clearing of the site including the car park and associated works. Parish: Bradwell Parish Council
APP 01 Application Number: 15/01914/FUL Demolition of The Suffolk Punch Public House and clearing of the site including the car park and associated works. AT The Suffolk Punch, 1 Langcliffe Drive, Heelands
More informationPlanning, Taxi Licensing and Rights of Way Committee Report. Valid Date: 29/06/2016
Planning, Taxi Licensing and Rights of Way Committee Report Application No: P/2016/0686 Grid Ref: 296587.2 267871.39 Community Council: Rhayader Valid Date: 29/06/2016 Officer: Karen Probert Applicant:
More informationAT MOONS YARD, GROVE ROAD, SELLING, FAVERSHAM PLANNING STATEMENT DHA REF: JAC/MG/9967
DEMOLITION OF EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS, REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING HARD SURFACE AREAS AND THE ERECTION OF 5 No DWELLINGS WITH AMENITY SPACE, PADDOCKS, PARKING, ACCESS AND LANDSCAPING AT MOONS YARD, GROVE
More informationWelcome. Proposals for land at Smug Oak Lane BRICKET WOOD
Proposals for land at Smug Oak Lane BRICKET WOOD Previous Linden Homes and Wates Developments scheme Welcome Welcome to Linden Homes and Wates Developments public exhibition. Working together as joint
More informationWELCOME. Land North of STEVENAGE. We would like to thank you for attending our public exhibition today.
WELCOME We would like to thank you for attending our public exhibition today. The purpose of this event is to share our proposals and hear your thoughts on our ideas. Members of the project team are on
More informationABOUT CALA HOMES CALA HOMES
WELCOME Welcome to this public consultation event for our proposed development on land to the east of Salisbury Road, in Hungerford. Thank you for taking the time to come along today. Homes and Wates Developments
More informationThe Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Wales) Regulations 2016, Regulation 13 Scoping Opinion
Mr Graham Clark Berrys Newchurch Farm Kinnersley Hereford HR3 6QQ BY EMAIL The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Wales) Regulations 2016, Regulation 13 Scoping Opinion SC/2017/0001
More information