Roosevelt TOD Assessment

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Roosevelt TOD Assessment"

Transcription

1 Roosevelt TOD Assessment Existing Conditions Summary Report Sound Transit TOD On-Call Contract No. RTA/AE Task Order No. 014 January 15, 2016 Final Report

2

3 Roosevelt TOD Assessment Existing Conditions Summary Report Sound Transit TOD On-Call No. RTA/AE Task Order No. 014 January 15, 2016 Prepared for: Ms. Sarah Lovell TOD Manager Department of Planning, Environment, and Project Development Sound Transit 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA Prepared by: Jeff Lehman, Project Manager Sara Roberts, SE, Principal KPFF Consulting Engineers Contributions by: VIA Architecture Land Use Code Summary Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit i

4 This page intentionally left blank. KPFF Consulting Engineers ii

5 Table of Contents ES. Executive Summary of Findings... 1 Purpose... 1 Summary of Findings Background Existing Conditions Assessment Site Description Lot Status Summary Land Use Code Summary Utility Service Summary Environmental and Geotechnical Considerations Items for Further Study Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit iii

6 List of Figures Figure 2-1: Vicinity Map... 3 Figure 2-2: Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station Area Aerial... 3 Figure 2-3: Roosevelt Station Area Construction Staging... 4 Figure 2-4: Green Construction Fence Surrounding Site... 5 Figure 2-5: Excavation Area from Pedestrian Viewing Window... 5 Figure 2-6: Excavation Plans of Main Site... 6 Figure 2-7: General Site Plan... 7 Figure 2-8: NW - Three-Dimensional Massing of Completed Roosevelt Station Site Conditions... 7 Figure 2-9: SE - Three-Dimensional Massing of Completed Roosevelt Station Site Conditions... 8 Figure 2-10: Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station Box Tie-Back Extents... 9 Figure 2-11: Anticipated Site Access Figure 2-12: Street Frontage at Roosevelt Way Figure 2-13: Street Frontage Restoration Plan at Roosevelt Way NE and NE 66 th and 67 th Streets Figure 2-14: Street Frontage at 12th Ave Figure 2-15: Bus Route 66 and 67 Stop on East Side of 12th Ave Figure 2-16: Street Frontage Restoration Plan at 12 th Ave and NE 66 th Figure 2-17: Street Frontage Restoration Plan at 12 th Ave and NE 67 th Figure 2-18: NE 66th Frontage Figure 2-19: NE 67th Frontage Figure 2-20: NE 67th Frontage - Power Pole Outside of Construction Fencing Figure 2-21: Construction Access to Main Site from Roosevelt Way NE Figure 2-22: Roosevelt Property Parcel History Figure 2-23: City of Seattle Express Mapper of Utilities Sanitary Sewer, Storm and Combined Sewer/Storm Figure 2-24: City of Seattle Express Mapper of Utilities - Water Figure 2-25: Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines in NE 67th Street Figure 2-26: Underground Power and Telecommunications Existing Conditions in 67th Street Figure 2-27: Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines over 12th Avenue NE Figure 2-28: Overhead Lines on 12th Avenue NE Crossing from East Side of Street to West Side Figure 2-29: Electrical Vaults and Ductbanks at 12 th Ave and NE 67 th Figure 2-30: Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines along NE 66th and Roosevelt Way Figure 2-31: PSE Gas System Maps 18107E and 18107F List of Tables Table 2-1: Utility Providers Appendices Appendix A VIA Roosevelt Station Area Zoning Code Summary KPFF Consulting Engineers iv

7 Executive Summary of Findings PURPOSE Sound Transit (ST) is performing planning level studies to assess future Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) potential at three properties, or assemblages of properties, located in the Roosevelt neighborhood of Seattle, Washington, within an area known as the Roosevelt Station Area Overlay District. The Roosevelt properties are located at 6600 Roosevelt Way NE, 1023 NE 66 th Street, 1027 NE 66 th Street and two unaddressed parcels at the northeast corner of 12 th Avenue NE and NE 67 th Street. The properties are located within multiple land use zones including NC3P-65 (2.0), NC3P-85 (2.0) and NC3P-85 (5.75). The largest property at 6600 Roosevelt Way NE, which encompasses the Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station North Entry, measures approximately 73,400 square feet (SF), 53,000 SF of which is available for TOD. The remaining two assemblages of properties located to the north, on the northwest corner of NE 67 th Street and 12 th Avenue NE, and to the south, at 1023 and 1027 NE 66 th Street, measure approximately 6,100 SF and 3,645 SF, respectively. The combined portion of the Roosevelt properties available for TOD measures a total of approximately 63,000 square feet (SF), or 1.37 acres (AC), in size. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The Seattle Municipal Code (SMC) allows for both residential and non-residential development within the NC3P-65 (2.0), NC3P-85 (2.0) and NC3P-85 (5.75) zones up to a height of 65 or 85 feet, as indicated by the zoning prefix. Permitted uses for these properties vary widely; however, the focus for this study surrounds uses that support TOD, including residential, office, and hotel. Floor Area Ratios (FARs) for these zones range from a minimum FAR of 2.0 and 5.75 for any single use, as indicated by the value in the zoning suffix, up to a maximum of 6.0 for mixed uses, with requirements for developers to use bonus incentives to achieve this higher FAR. Roosevelt Way NE and 12 th Avenue NE are classified by the City of Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) as both Principal Arterial and Minor Transit Streets, carrying potential requirements for sidewalk and pedestrian facility improvements such as pedestrian weather protection and lighting. The SMC further classifies Roosevelt Way NE as a Principal Pedestrian Street, requiring street level uses, such as retail, eating establishments, or other use, to be incorporated as part of any future development program. NE 66 th and NE 67 th are both classified as Commercial/Residential Access Streets, with requirements for improvements such as wide sidewalks, landscape buffers and street trees. Vehicular access to the largest property will likely be permitted from NE 67 th Street, though future developers may apply for a departure to allow for permitted access from Roosevelt Way NE or NE 66 th Street, if proof can be established that access via NE 67 th Street would create a disturbance caused by noise, heavy traffic or other. Access to the smaller assemblage of properties to the north will likely be required from NE 67 th Street and from NE 66 th Street for the south assemblage of properties. All of the Roosevelt properties are currently being used for construction staging related to the Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station construction. These properties are currently served by a number of different utility providers from various public and private entities, providing sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage, electric power, natural gas, and telecommunication services. A preliminary review of parcel title reports provided by ST identifies a few easements and/or encumbrances that no longer appear applicable. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 1

8 1. Background Sound Transit (ST) is performing planning level studies to assess future Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) potential at three properties, or assemblages of properties, adjacent to the Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station (Roosevelt Station) in the Roosevelt neighborhood of Seattle, Washington, within an area known as the Roosevelt Station Overlay District. The Roosevelt Station Area properties are located at 6600 Roosevelt Way NE, 1023 NE 66 th Street, 1027 NE 66 th Street and two unaddressed parcels at the northeast corner of 12 th Avenue NE and NE 67 th Street. The properties are located within multiple land use zones including NC3P-65 (2.0), NC3P-85 (2.0) and NC3P-85 (5.75). The combined portion of the Roosevelt properties available for TOD measures a total of 63,000 square feet (SF), or 1.37 acres (AC), in size. ST requested that KPFF conduct an existing conditions assessment, including review of applicable zoning and code requirements, existing utility service and base map information, and existing titles, easements, and encumbrances related to this property. Based on our review, KPFF has prepared this existing conditions summary, which focuses on identifying applicable zoning and code requirements, existing utility service and base map information, and existing titles, easements, and encumbrances which may inhibit future development potential for this property. KPFF Consulting Engineers 2

9 2. Existing Conditions Assessment 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The location of the Roosevelt Station Area properties within the greater context of the City of Seattle (the City) is depicted in Figure 2-1 below. Figure 2-2, below, depicts their location within the local Seattle context. Figure 2-1: Vicinity Map (Underlay Courtesy of King County imap; Accessed August 11, 2015) Figure 2-2: Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station Area Aerial (Underlay Courtesy of 2015 Google Earth) For the purposes of this report, the two unaddressed parcels located at the northeast corner of 12th Avenue NE and NE 67th Street will be referred to as the North Roosevelt TOD site (or North Site), the four smaller parcels located at 1023 and 1027 NE 66th Street will be referred to as the South Roosevelt TOD site (or South Site), and the largest single parcel located at 6600 Roosevelt Way NE will be referred to as the Main Roosevelt TOD site (or Main Site). Figure 2-2 above illustrates the parcel divisions noted above. The core focus of this report is to provide existing conditions related to the Main Site, which Sound Transit has prioritized due to its anticipated availability for TOD ahead of the other two parcels. The North Site is a rectangular shaped site located within the City s NC3P-65 (2.0) zone, measuring approximately 6,100 SF, or 0.14 AC, in size, bounded by an adjacent property to the north and west, 12th Avenue NE (12th Ave) to the east and NE 67th Street (NE 67th) to the south. This North Site measures approximately 102 feet north-south and 60 feet east-west and is currently being used as construction staging for Roosevelt Station construction. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 3

10 The South Site is located within the City s NC3P-85 (2.0) zone, measuring approximately 3,645 SF, or 0.08 AC, in size, bounded by an adjacent property to the south and west, NE 66th Street (NE 66th) to the north and the Roosevelt Station South Entry to the east. This South Site measures approximately 102 feet north-south and 36 feet east-west and is currently being used as construction staging for Roosevelt Station construction. The Main Site is a rectangular shaped site located within the City s NC3P-85 (5.75) zone, measuring approximately 73,400 SF, or 1.68 AC, in size, bounded by Roosevelt Way NE (Roosevelt Way) to the west, NE 67th Street (NE 67th) to the north, 12th Ave to the east and NE 66th to the south. The Main Site measures approximately 204 feet north-south by 266 feet east-west. The east portion of the site is currently under construction and will be permanently dedicated for use as the Roosevelt Station North Entry (North Entry). The North Entry covers approximately 20,400 SF of the east side of the Main Site, leaving approximately 53,000 SF to the west for future TOD development. The western portions of the Main Site, as well as both the North and South Site, are currently being used for construction staging in support of the remainder of the Roosevelt Station (Figure 2-3). The entire Main Site slopes approximately 4% from north to south and is currently surrounded by a tall, solid green construction fence providing site security (Figure 2-4). There are viewing windows on the south end of the construction area, on NE 65th Street, where pedestrians can view the site and see the excavation area (Figure 2-5). Figure 2-3: Roosevelt Station Area Construction Staging (Underlay Courtesy of 2015 Google Earth) KPFF Consulting Engineers 4

11 Figure 2-4: Green Construction Fence Surrounding Site (Looking Southwest from 12 th Ave) Figure 2-5: Excavation Area from Pedestrian Viewing Window (Looking North from NE 65 th Street) Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 5

12 The Main Site was previously used as a QFC Grocery Store and associated parking. Site preparation documents for the Roosevelt Station project include excavation plans that show which elements will remain through excavation. These site preparation documents (Figure 2-6) mainly show that existing basement walls and retaining walls along the north and southwest site boundary are to remain throughout excavation. According to documentation from ST on August 26, 2015, the QFC basement area was backfilled with concrete slurry, jet grout spoils, and on-site soils. Construction monitoring documents do not indicate if backfill materials were placed in lifts or compacted. Future development proposing new building foundations, excavation, and below grade construction, should be aware of these below-grade structures and backfill material. Figure 2-6: Excavation Plans of Main Site (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated January 17, 2012) A general site plan prepared by Jacobs Associates, dated June 22, 2015, (Figure 2-7) represents the proposed site conditions at completion of the Roosevelt Station construction project. The site plan shows the constructed Roosevelt Station occupying approximately the east 100 feet of the site. Project completion will also include frontage improvements represented in Figure 2-7 below. A three-dimensional rendering of the completed project shown in Figures 2-8 and 2-9 also depicts these finished conditions. KPFF Consulting Engineers 6

13 Figure 2-7: General Site Plan (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated June 22, 2015) Figure 2-8: View Looking Northwest of Three-Dimensional Massing of Completed Roosevelt Station Site Conditions (Portion of 90% Roosevelt Station 3D Model Accessed Via Sharepoint on 8/15/2015) Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 7

14 Figure 2-9: View Looking Southeast of Three-Dimensional Massing of Completed Roosevelt Station Site Conditions (Portion of 90% Roosevelt Station 3D Model Accessed Via Sharepoint on 8/15/2015) The Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station is composed of both above- and below-grade structures. The abovegrade station structure, known as the head house, extends approximately 67 feet above grade at the highest point. The below-grade station concrete structure, known as the station box, extends approximately 100 feet below grade. Soldier pile with tie back shoring utilized for excavation and construction of the below-grade station box will remain in place following completion of the light rail station box construction. A portion of the soldier pile tie backs will be de-tensioned to allow for excavation for TOD on the Main Site; however, future TOD excavation depths will be limited to approximately 20 feet from grade for a distance of 100 feet beyond the station box walls. Figure 2-10 below conceptually illustrates the extents of the station box tie backs and associated encumbrance. KPFF Consulting Engineers 8

15 Figure 2-10: Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station Box Tie Back Extents Section Looking North In general, when a project has frontage on both an arterial road and a residential/commercial access street, access is required to be taken from the residential/commercial access street. Furthermore, NE 66 th Street is planned for designation as a green street which discourages vehicular access. Therefore, site access to the Main Site will likely be permitted from NE 67 th, though future developers may apply for a departure through the design review process to allow for permitted access from Roosevelt Way or NE 66 th, if a clear case can be made for why the NE 66 th Street access would provide for better urban design as interpreted by the Seattle Design Review Board. An illustration of potential site accesses is shown in Figure 2-11 below. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 9

16 Figure 2-11: Anticipated Site Access (Underlay Courtesy of 2014 Google Earth) Roosevelt Way is classified by the City of Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) as both a Principal Arterial and Minor Transit Street, carrying potential requirements for sidewalk and pedestrian facility improvements such as pedestrian weather protection and lighting. Traffic flow on this portion of the road is one-way, southbound only. The roadway has two motor vehicle lanes, a bicycle lane, on-street parking, and a total right-of-way (ROW) width of 60 feet. Existing frontage improvements include asphalt paved roadway, vertical concrete curb, concrete sidewalks, and street trees on both sides of the roadway (Figure 2-12). KPFF Consulting Engineers 10

17 Figure 2-12: Street Frontage at Roosevelt Way (Looking South) The sidewalk along the east side of Roosevelt Way, which is the west side of the Main Site, currently contains areas of cracking and lifting from tree roots. Roosevelt Station site restoration plans identify complete reconstruction of the sidewalk as well as a 20-foot-wide driveway allowing vehicular access to the site from Roosevelt Way, as shown in Figure Roosevelt Way is also classified as a Minor Transit Street and King County Metro Routes 66 and 67 have stops north and south of the site. Figure 2-13: Street Frontage Restoration Plan at Roosevelt Way NE and NE 66 th and 67 th Streets (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated June 22, 2015) Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 11

18 According to SDOT, 12 th Ave is also classified as a Principal Arterial and Minor Transit Street, Traffic flow on this street is currently one-way in the northbound direction. Existing frontage improvements include new asphalt paved roadway, planter strip, vertical concrete curb, and concrete sidewalks on the west side of the street. The roadway currently includes two motor vehicle lanes, a bicycle lane, on-street parking, and a total ROW width of 60 feet. King County Metro Routes 66 and 67 currently have stops along 12 th Ave north and south of the site; see Figure 2-15 below. Figure 2-14: Street Frontage at 12th Ave (Looking Northwest) Figure 2-15: Bus Route 66 and 67 Stop on East Side of 12th Ave (Looking North from NE 65th) KPFF Consulting Engineers 12

19 A construction fence is currently erected along the edge of roadway on the west side of 12 th Ave, which is the east side of the Main Site. Full frontage improvements on the east side of the site will be constructed as part of the Roosevelt Station construction as shown in Figures 2-16 and 2-17 below. 12 TH AVE NE Figure 2-16: Street Frontage Restoration Plan at 12 th Ave and NE 66 th (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated June 22, 2015) Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 13

20 Figure 2-17: Street Frontage Restoration Plan at 12 th Ave and NE 67 th (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated June 22, 2015) The existing NE 66 th roadway is concrete with vertical concrete curbs and concrete sidewalks along the south side of the roadway. The green construction fence goes up to the edge of pavement on the north side of the roadway. Both the street frontage and the section of NE 66 th removed for tunnel excavation are identified for full restoration as part of Roosevelt Station construction from the 12 th Avenue frontage up to approximately 30 feet east of the east edge of the Roosevelt Way roadway (Figure 2-17). NE 66 th and NE 67 th are both classified as Commercial/Residential Access Streets, with requirements for improvements such as wide sidewalks, landscape buffers, and street trees. The City of Seattle has also communicated that in the future NE 66 th Street may be classified as a Green Street, which would include requirements for additional pedestrian accommodations and landscaping. Due to the current construction of the Roosevelt Station on the east portion of the Main Site, sections of both NE 66 th and NE 67 th have been temporarily closed and incorporated into the construction site; see Figures 2-18 and 2-19 below. KPFF Consulting Engineers 14

21 APPENDIX A Figure 2-18: NE 66th Frontage (Looking East from Roosevelt Way) Figure 2-19: NE 67th Frontage (Looking East from Roosevelt Way) The existing NE 67th roadway is concrete with vertical concrete curbs, concrete sidewalks, as well as a vegetation strip with street trees and ground cover along the north side of the roadway. The green construction fence goes up to the edge of pavement on the south side except for a small distance where the fence goes around a power and telecommunications pole; see Figure At this location, frontage improvements include concrete vertical curb and sidewalks with concrete panel replacement at the east end of the roadway, and an area of curb modification at the west end of the roadway (Figures 2-13 and 2-17). Frontage and roadway improvements along NE 67th will be completed as part of Roosevelt Station construction. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 15

22 Figure 2-20: NE 67th Frontage - Power Pole Outside of Construction Fencing (Looking South) Main construction vehicle access to the site is currently from three locations: one off of Roosevelt Way (Figure 2-21), and two entrances off of 12 th Avenue, each with rolling gates. There are smaller pedestrian entry-exit doors into the site located throughout the fencing. Figure 2-21: Construction Access to Main Site from Roosevelt Way NE (Looking Northeast from NE 66 th and Roosevelt Way) 2.2 LOT STATUS SUMMARY According to the King County Assessor s map, the North and South sites consists of multiple tax lots, while the Main Site currently consists of a single tax parcel. See Figure 2-22 below for an illustration of the various tax lots. KPFF Consulting Engineers 16

23 The Main Site was acquired by Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority (ST) from Pryde Johnson Roosevelt, LLC, through condemnation in December 2008 under recording number The current title report provided by ST (prepared by First American Title, dated December 1, 2008) references only a single side-sewer easement on the property. The side sewer easement is from 1925 and presumably benefitted an internal lot prior to consolidation of the entire block as a single tax parcel number. Further discussions with the title insurance company could warrant removal of the title exception as it is no longer relevant. City of Seattle DPD GIS data shows that there is an open land use and building permit active on the Main Site to allow for construction of the approximately 9,300 SF North Station Entry and associated light rail tunnel connections. In addition, there are various other open permits for electrical, dewatering, and temporary sewer connections associated with Roosevelt Station construction. The Main Site tax lot could potentially be segregated using a short plat to separate the ST Roosevelt Station infrastructure on the east side of the lot from the future TOD. The short plat could create separate fee-simple lots allowing separate consideration of access and utility services to the separate developments. Short plats are administered by the City through the Master Use Permit (MUP) process. They are reviewed and approved administratively, typically with approval conditions. Public notice is provided and the approval decision may be appealed. Figure 2-22: Roosevelt Property Parcel History (Portion of King County Assessor s Map) Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 17

24 The North Site consists of two tax parcels, which are currently unaddressed. According to the title report provided by ST (Prepared by Pacific Northwest Title, dated January 16, 2007), these are both fee-simple lots with no title exceptions. Future development proposals may pursue development on each parcel individually or consolidate the parcels for a larger development proposal. The South Site consists of four tax lots, previously belonging to an 8-unit lot subdivision approved by the City of Seattle in 2002, and recorded with King County under recording number The unit lots are a unique City of Seattle land segregation process to create fee-simple single-family, townhouse, or row house lots demonstrating zoning and land use compliance of the parent lot. Unit lot subdivisions frequently include shared access and utilities contained in easements. It appears that the unit lot subdivision has been broken with the four eastern most lots utilized as part of the permanent Roosevelt Station South Entry. It is no longer possible for residential development on the remaining four unit lots to show compliance with the original unit lot subdivision requirements for zoning and land use, access, and utilities. Any new development proposal will likely need to submit a new land use application under the current zoning which may result in consolidation of the remaining four unit lots. Breaking a unit lot subdivision is a unique condition, which may warrant discussions with DPD to clarify whether any other additional steps are necessary. 2.3 LAND USE CODE SUMMARY According to Seattle DPD Zoning Map 43, the Main, North and South Sites are all currently located within the greater Roosevelt Station Area Overlay District, with further zoning designations applied to each site. The Main Site is located in the NC3P-85 (5.75) zone, while the North and South Sites are located within the NC3P- 65 (2.0) and NC3P-85 (2.0), respectively, as indicated in Seattle DPD Zoning Map 43. A brief land use code summary is provided as Appendix A. Applicable codes that will guide future development at these sites include the most recently adopted version of the following codes: SMC, Title 23 Land Use Code (Accessed 08/2015) 2012 International Building Code (as amended by City of Seattle) 2012 Seattle Energy Code Environmentally Critical Areas (ECA) Code 2012 Seattle Fire Code 2014 Seattle Electrical Code 2012 Seattle Plumbing Code Seattle Mechanical Code 2012 Seattle Residential Code (SRC) The NC3P-85 (5.75) and NC3P-85 (2.0) zones, encompassing the Main and South Sites respectively, allow for residential or commercial development up to a height of 85 feet, as noted in section 23.47A.012 of the SMC. FARs for these zones range from a minimum FAR of 5.75 for the Main Site and 2.0 for the South Site, as indicated by the value in the zoning suffix. The maximum FAR within a Station Overlay District is 6.0 for mixed uses, with requirements for developers to use bonus incentives to achieve this higher FAR, as noted within Section 23.58A of the SMC. Gross floor area below-grade, gross floor areas containing parking, and rooftop greenhouses are not counted toward the minimum FAR. KPFF Consulting Engineers 18

25 The NC3P-65 (2.0) zone, encompassing the North Site, allows for residential or commercial development up to a height of 65 feet, as noted in Section 23.47A.012 of the SMC. FARs for this zone ranges from a minimum FAR of 2.0, as indicated by the value in the zoning suffix, to a maximum FAR of 5.75 for mixed uses. The SMC requires developers to use bonus incentives to achieve this higher FAR, as noted within Section 23.58A of the SMC. Gross floor area below-grade, gross floor areas containing parking, and rooftop greenhouses are not counted toward the minimum FAR. The Main, North, and South Sites all lay within a pedestrian overlay district, as indicated by the P within the zoning designation. The pedestrian overlay district requires that 80 percent of street-facing façade on the sites be dedicated to retail or other commercial uses listed in Section 23.47A.005.D.1 with an average depth of retail or other space measuring 30 feet, with a minimum depth of 15 feet. Loading berths for future residential development are not required; however, low- and medium-demand nonresidential uses, such as business support services or office use, would require at least one loading berth for aggregate gross floor areas between 10,000 to 40,000 gross square feet (GSF). Higher-demand nonresidential uses, such as eating and drinking establishments and heavy commercial, would require at least one loading berth for uses under 16,000 GSF, with additional loading berths required for uses exceeding 16,000 GSF, according to Section Table A. Located within the Roosevelt Station Area Overlay, all sites are exempted from minimum parking requirements. Development within this NC3P-85 zone will need to meet additional requirements per the SMC and City of Seattle ROW Manual, including but not limited to street frontage and landscape development standards, drainage facility improvements and pedestrian access improvements, and fire access for non-arterial ROWs. NE 66th Street is currently included in the Roosevelt Neighborhood Streetscape Concept Plan, which recommends a 5-foot setback at the southern edge of the Main Site. This plan is voluntary but encouraged by the City and the Roosevelt Neighborhood Association. A 10-foot setback at the eastern edge of the property for residential levels may be necessary to provide fire separation from the transit station. 2.4 UTILITY SERVICE SUMMARY This utility summary focuses on providing input regarding the Main Site, with limited information regarding the North and South Sites. The Main Site is served by a number of different utility providers from various public and private entities. Utility and service providers serving the Main Site are summarized in Table 2-1 below. All utilities serving the site have been called out to be capped at the property line as part of construction documents for the Roosevelt Station. Table 2-1: Utility Providers Utility or Service Sanitary Sewer Water Storm Drainage Electric Power Natural Gas Telecommunications Provider Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) SPU SPU Seattle City Light (SCL) Puget Sound Energy (PSE) Centurylink, Comcast, and Frontier,Wave, others Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 19

26 2.4.1 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drainage According to the City of Seattle Franchise Maps (Figure 2-23) and Seattle side sewer cards, the Main Site is served by side sewer connection to combined sanitary and storm sewer mains. There is a 10-inch combined sewer main located in NE 66 th and an 8-inch combined sewer main in NE 67 th that both serve the Main Site. The combined sewer main in NE 67 th has three separate services that serve the site from the north, while the main in NE 66 th has 5 services that serve the site from the south and one from the west. These services are all either 6-inch or 4-inch diameter. Figure 2-23: City of Seattle Express Mapper of Utilities Sanitary Sewer, Storm and Combined Sewer/Storm Multiple existing side sewer services are serving the site. A future development proposal will need to physically investigate these services through potholing and video observation of the lines if they propose to reuse them. Re-use of existing side sewers is common if slip lining of the existing pipe is completed with new construction. In addition, future development proposals will also need to evaluate locations of existing side sewers in relation to on-site building mechanical plans to confirm connections can be made at the existing sewer service locations based on internal building plumbing. On-site and off-site improvements will need to provide Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) to the maximum extent feasible per the requirements of the FCWQRTTRM. Typically bioretention is not required in the ROW when the frontage improvements drain to combined sewer Water According to the Roosevelt Station construction plans, there is a 32-inch steel water main in Roosevelt Way, an 8-inch cast iron water main in NE 66 th and NE 67 th, and 42-inch steel water main in 12 th Ave. An overview of the existing water mains can be seen on the SPU map showing water services and other utilities in the KPFF Consulting Engineers 20

27 project area (Figure 2-24). The map shows that the main in 12 th Ave and Roosevelt Way are classified as supply lines. No new services could be taken from these lines. The mains in NE 66 th and NE 67 th are both distribution mains. There are two existing water services from the main in NE 67 th and one from NE 66 th. There is a fire hydrant located on the southwest corner of the Main Site. Other hydrants are located across the street from the site at the three other corners of the property. Future development proposals will need to obtain a water availability certificate from SPU to determine the point of connection for water service for their development. Water service for the new Roosevelt Station is currently taken from NE 66 th. Figure 2-24: City of Seattle Express Mapper of Utilities - Water Electric Power and Telecommunications There are existing overhead power, telecommunication, and fiber optic lines along the property frontage for the west half of the block along NE 67 th (Figure 2-25 below). At approximately mid-block the overhead lines are carried underground where the Roosevelt Station plans show the underground lines continue east along NE 67 th. Power along NE 67 th Street is underground for the length of the block (Figure 2-26 below). An existing conditions plan prepared by Jacobs Associates and provided by Sound Transit shows that the underground power, telecommunication, and fiber optic lines cross to the north side of 67 th Street and terminate at vaults before reaching the light rail tunnel construction area (Figure 2-26 below). Any new development proposal will be required to meet minimum clearances from overhead power and telecommunication lines, or must relocate those lines underground. Undergrounding of overhead lines is the developer s responsibility. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 21

28 Figure 2-25: Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines in NE 67th Street (facing west/southwest) Figure 2-26: Underground Power and Telecommunications Existing Conditions in 67th Street (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated June 22, 2015) There are also both overhead power and telecommunication lines located along 12 th Ave. The lines are currently on the east side of the street, south of the Main Site (Figure 2-27 below) and cross over the street to the west KPFF Consulting Engineers 22

29 side of the street just north of the site (Figure 2-28 below); however, this is a temporary condition. Overhead lines will be relocated to the west side of 12 th Avenue along the property frontage following construction. This should have no bearing on future TOD development, as the TOD parcel is not fronting on 12 th Avenue. Survey information included in Roosevelt Station Site Preparation documents indicate that there is a Qwest (or Century Link) vault located in the intersection of 12 th Ave and NE 67 th and another located slightly north of the Main Site in 12 th Ave. In addition to these vaults, there are multiple fiber optic duct banks located in 12 th Ave. Figure 2-29 shows Roosevelt Station Site Preparation documentation identifying a 23-inch, 16-inch, 14-inch, and 12-inch duct bank located in 12 th Ave. Figure 2-27: Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines over 12th Avenue NE (facing north) Figure 2-28: Overhead Lines on 12th Avenue NE Crossing from East Side of Street to West Side (facing south/southwest) Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 23

30 APPENDIX A th th Figure 2-29: Electrical Vaults and Ductbanks at 12 Ave and NE 67 (Prepared by Jacobs Associates, Dated June 22, 2015) A portion of the NE 66th frontage includes both telecommunication and power lines overhead. Similar to the lines along NE 67th, the lines are overhead along the south side of the street, for the western extent of the street (Figure 2-30). The lines underground at the third pole shown in Figure 2-30 and continue eastward. These underground lines have been identified to be deactivated and removed as a part of Roosevelt Station construction. th Figure 2-30: Overhead Power and Telecommunication Lines along NE 66th and Roosevelt Way (Looking Northeast along NE 66 at Roosevelt Way) KPFF Consulting Engineers 24

31 Telecommunication and fiber optic lines are overhead along Roosevelt Way (Figure 2-30). Underground power for street lighting runs along the property frontage below the existing sidewalk. This location is not in a district noted by Seattle City Light (SCL) as requiring underground distribution. Future development proposals will need to carefully review building clearance requirements from overhead lines, or alternatively will need to underground overhead lines Natural Gas According to Puget Sound Energy (PSE) maps 18107E and 18107F (Figure 2-31), there are 2-inch intermediate pressure gas mains in 12 th Ave, NE 66 th, Roosevelt Way, and NE 67 th. Portions of the mains in NE 66 th and NE 67 th along the east end of the Main Site have been deactivated for Roosevelt Station construction. Roosevelt Station Plans do not show reactivation of these mains. The Main Site has four 1¼-inch services on the north property line and two 1¼-inch services along the south side of the property. The site also has a single 1¼-inch service on the west side of the site from the main in Roosevelt Way. The gas services shown on the east end of the site, along the deactivated mains, are no longer in service and appear to have been removed. The deactivated services include five 1¼-inch services and a single 1-inch service off of NE 66 th, 12 th Ave, and NE 67 th. Future development will need to submit a service application to PSE according to the needs of the specific development proposal. It is common for new development to require a new service connection to the main at a size appropriate for the scope of development proposed. All work related to gas service is designed and permitted by PSE at the developer s expense. The North Site receives gas service from the main in 12 th Ave. Future development of the South Site will require construction of new gas services, as their previous services stemmed from portions of the gas main in NE 66 th which were deactivated. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 25

32 Figure 2-31: PSE Gas System Maps 18107E and 18107F (Combined). 2.5 ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS Environmental Critical Areas According to the City of Seattle DPD GIS data, there are no mapped environmental critical areas (ECAs) on the subject property. The City of Seattle tracks the following ECAs: steep slopes, potential slide areas, riparian corridors, wetlands, liquefaction areas, flood prone areas, abandoned landfill, known slide areas, peat settlement areas, wildlife, and shoreline habitat areas. ST may consider performing additional site specific environmental assessment to determine if ECAs are present Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Report A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared for the Main Site by Environmental Partners, Inc., dated November 29, According to the report, there is potential for shallow soil contamination due to homes with heating oil storage tanks and a gasoline service station previously located on the property. The Phase 1 ESA indicates that the shallow soil impacts were likely removed with excavation and grading for the QFC Grocery Store and associated parking lot that occupied the site after KPFF Consulting Engineers 26

33 2.5.3 Phase 2 Environmental Assessment Report Senior Geologist Greg McCormick of CDM Smith prepared a memo dated November 28, 2006, that recommended that a Phase 2 ESA not be conducted for the property. The reasoning behind this recommendation was that residual contamination is likely limited and the investigation of possible contaminated areas would not be cost effective. Instead of initiating a Phase 2 ESA at that time, McCormick recommended that LRT construction contingency planning include field screening during excavation of soils that may be contaminated, lab analysis of soil samples, and the disposal of soil with levels of contamination exceeding the applicable cleanup levels Geotechnical Engineering Report A Geotechnical Baseline Report was prepared for the Northgate Link Extension Project (Contract N125) by Jacobs Associates, dated August Section 6 of the report details some of the testing associated with the Roosevelt Station site. Findings noted within the baseline report identify a potential higher water table during the wet months of the year, possibly requiring dewatering when excavating within the Main Site. Baseline hazardous or contaminated substances are not expected at the Main Site, as noted within the baseline report. However, removal of higher ph containing materials, such as the below-grade retaining walls and concrete slurry remaining on site, may require special disposal requirements. ST may consider completing an updated geotechnical investigation specific to the Main, North, and South Sites in order to understand potential impacts to property value as well as to shorten the due-diligence time frame of perspective buyers. Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit 27

34 3. Items for Further Study This Existing Conditions Summary identified the information associated with the current state of the sites described above. There are several items that are recommended for further study should ST want to better understand details and negotiations required for future TOD at the subject site: Requirements for Development Adjacent to Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station: Similar to Capitol Hill Station Area, it is recommended that ST consider the benefit of preparing a technical document which identifies specific requirements that a future developer will need to adhere to when developing adjacent to the Roosevelt Link Light Rail Station. Items include, but are not limited to: o o o o Limitation of building loads imposed to the adjacent below-grade station box, which may impact the overall height and foundation layout of future TOD. Limits of excavation depth and extents adjacent to the below-grade station box. Potential for transmission of vibration and/or noise from the adjacent active station. General construction requirements regarding crane swings, construction access, maintenance of sidewalk access or other similar items. Due Diligence Materials: Recommend that ST evaluate the benefit of supplying additional due diligence materials that would likely be required by a prospective buyer considering purchase of this property. Lack of due diligence materials may cause delay in the sale for the buyer while they obtain these additional materials such as an updated ALTA survey and a Geotechnical Engineering Report. Title Clean Up and Parcel Data: Recommend that ST evaluate the benefit of cleaning up the title and preparing updated parcel data, including short plat of the Main Site, consolidation of the broken unit lot subdivision on the South Site and other items identified in Section 2.2 above. Possible Environmental Assessment: Recommend that ST evaluate the benefit of completing a Phase 2 Assessment for the Roosevelt Station Area properties. Findings from completion of a Phase 2 Assessment may not necessarily trigger a need for any action by ST prior to disposition, but would simplify a buyer s due diligence and therefore the property transaction. This report was prepared based upon an agreed scope, schedule, and budget negotiated between ST and KPFF. This report is for the exclusive use of ST. KPFF Consulting Engineers 28

35 Appendix A VIA Roosevelt Station Area Zoning Code Summary Roosevelt TOD Assessment Sound Transit Appendix A

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department ROYAL OAKS NORTH OUTLINE PLAN OP-07-03 NW 35-71-6 W6M May 7, 2007 Royal Oaks North Outline Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........ 3 1.1 Purpose

More information

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services

OP Council Resolution June 16, Planning and Development Services OP-08-01 Council Resolution June 16, 2008 Planning and Development Services Kingsgate Landing Outline Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose of Plan 1 1.2 Plan Area Location 1 1.3 Ownership

More information

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018

ROAD CLOSURE AND LAND USE AMENDMENT SILVER SPRINGS (WARD 1) NORTHEAST OF NOSEHILL DRIVE NW AND SILVER SPRINGS ROAD NW BYLAWS 2C2018 AND 29D2018 Page 1 of 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application proposes redesignating two parcels in the community of Silver Springs from Special Purpose Future Urban Development (S-FUD) District and undesignated road

More information

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS

EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS EXHIBIT B PROJECT NARRATIVE POULSBO MEADOWS Name of Project: Poulsbo Meadows; A Planned Residential Development (PRD)/Plat Applicants Name: PBH Group LLC/Byron Harris PO Box 1010 Silverdale, WA 98038 Description

More information

The transportation system in a community is an

The transportation system in a community is an 7 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system in a community is an important factor contributing to the quality of life of the residents. Without a sound transportation system to bring both goods and patrons

More information

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax

Town of Windham. Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME voice fax Town of Windham Planning Department 8 School Road Windham, ME 04062 voice 207.864-5960 fax 207.892.1916 MEMO DATE: TO: Staff Review Committee FROM: Amanda Lessard, Planner Cc: Ellen Rathbone, St. Germain

More information

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC

Land Use Amendment in Southwood (Ward 11) at and Elbow Drive SW, LOC 2018 November 15 Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This land use amendment application was submitted by Rick Balbi Architect on 2017 August 31 on behalf of Sable Developments Ltd, and with authorization from

More information

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Drexel, Barrell & Co. Drexel, Barrell & Co. December 21, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning

More information

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS WHEN PROCESS TYPE III IS USED References to Process Type III applications are found in several places in the Milton Municipal Code (MMC), indicating that the development, activity, or use, is permitted

More information

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC

14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC 14 October 10, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MPB, INC PROPERTY OWNER: MUNDEN & ASSOCIATES, LP STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-1 & AG-2 to Conditional O-2) ADDRESS

More information

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH

12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 12 January 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: TAILWIND DEVELOPMENT GROUP,LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (from PD-H1 Planned

More information

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements

SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements CITY OF LANCASTER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, California 93534 (661) 723-6100 SPECIFIC PLAN Requirements Purpose The purpose of a specific plan is to provide for the logical development

More information

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018

M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018 M E M O R A N D U M July 27, 2018 To: Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee From: Kenneth Baker, Sr. Director of Planning and Development Services Subject: Item #6 First National Bank Purpose Review,

More information

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan

Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan Red Fox Commercial Outline Plan City of Cold Lake, Alberta Prepared by Durrance Projects Ltd and Ross W. Sharp & Associates Ltd October 2014 Rupert 1 Table of Contents 1. PURPOSE...3 1.1. Location...4

More information

Drexel, Barrell & Co.

Drexel, Barrell & Co. Drexel, Barrell & Co. June 18, 2018 Engineers/Surveyors Boulder Colorado Springs Greeley 3 South 7 th Street Colorado Springs, Colorado 80905-1501 719 260-0887 719 260-8352 Fax El Paso County Planning

More information

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan

Town of Portola Valley General Plan. Nathhorst Triangle Area Plan Town of Portola Valley General Plan Amended December 10, 1997 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Planning Area... 1 Objectives... 2 Principles... 2 Standards... 4 Description... 4 Community Commercial...

More information

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Zone: I-3. Tier:

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at  Zone: I-3. Tier: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

Transportation. Strategies for Action

Transportation. Strategies for Action Transportation A major priority for the Overlake Neighborhood is to develop a multimodal transportation system. To achieve this system, a balance has to be found among travel, circulation and access needs;

More information

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 181 Burloak Drive, Oakville February 2017 Our File: 1730B 230-7050 WESTON ROAD / WOODBRIDGE / ONTARIO / L4L 8G7 / T: 905 761 5588/ F: 905 761 5589/WWW.MHBCPLAN.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

IV. Development Standards

IV. Development Standards IV. Development Standards Seattle Children s proposes development standards to govern physical development within the MIO boundaries. As a supplement to the proposed development standards, Children s proposes

More information

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014

McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014 Introduction / Written Statement McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville McDonald s Corporation is proposing to redevelop the existing McDonald s eating establishment with a drive-through located at 121 N

More information

2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC WAY COMMENT PERIOD: JUNE 1 TO JUNE 30, 2015

2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE PUBLIC WAY COMMENT PERIOD: JUNE 1 TO JUNE 30, 2015 AGENCY: 2016 REVISIONS COMMENT FORM Section Title Number Chapter 1 Introduction Comment 1.1 CDOT Mission Statement 1.2 Purpose of Rules and Regulations for Construction in the Public Way 1.3 Chicago Department

More information

Low Impact Development Code Update and Integration Training

Low Impact Development Code Update and Integration Training Low Impact Development Code Update and Integration Training Project Team CPD Solutions Instructors Gretchen Muller Senior Associate Rebecca Dugopolski Senior Engineer Logistics Schedule 4-hour training

More information

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009

North Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009 North Oakville East November, 2009 POLICY CONTEXT 1) Purpose a) The purpose of this document is to be a guide for the location, configuration, design and development of the parks system for the North Oakville

More information

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services

CITY OF PUYALLUP. Background. Development Services CITY OF PUYALLUP Development Services 333 South Meridian Puyallup WA 98371 To: City Council From: Katie Baker, AICP, Planning Division Re: South Hill Neighborhood Plan Adoption Date: (Meeting date: February

More information

DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE

DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE RFQ: 17-C-00003 DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES FOR THE DESIGN CRITERIA PACKAGE PREPARED BY: JAMES E. JACKSON, JR. AIA CITY ARCHITECT CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT and INTERFLOW ENGINEERING, L.L.C DESIGN CRITERIA

More information

Palisades Outline Plan

Palisades Outline Plan NE ¼ 25 36 28 W4 Town of Penhold Approved August 13, 2012 Contents Figures & Tables... 2 Introduction... 1 Overview... 1 Purpose... 1 Development Area... 3 Ownership... 3 Topography... 3 Existing & Surrounding

More information

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area

Ten Mile Creek Planning Area PLANNING AREA POLICIES TEN MILE CREEK Ten Mile Creek Planning Area Location and Context The Ten Mile Creek Planning Area ( Ten Mile Creek area ) is located south of the current Boise AOCI, generally south

More information

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN

COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN COLVER ROAD INDUSTRIAL CONCEPT PLAN A CONCEPTUAL LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR TA-4 AN URBAN RESERVE AREA OF THE CITY TALENT City of Talent Adopted by City Council Resolution No., June, 2015 PART

More information

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report

ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville. Environmental Screening Report Page 1 of 18 ENBRIDGE GAS DISTRIBUTION INC. Proposed Relocation for Ninth Line, Markham and Whitchurch-Stouffville Environmental Screening Report July 2011 Page 2 of 18 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION

More information

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction

Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative. Introduction Mitchell Ranch South MPUD Application for Master Planned Unit Development Approval Project Narrative Introduction Mitchell Ranch South is a proposed single family (detached) residential development on

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 & PUD-0000102-2017 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 18, 2017 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision Dauphin Creek Estates Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL

More information

S o u t h C e n t r a l O u t l i n e P l a n. Leduc Business Park. North Leduc Industrial Area Structure Plan C it y of Led u c.

S o u t h C e n t r a l O u t l i n e P l a n. Leduc Business Park. North Leduc Industrial Area Structure Plan C it y of Led u c. Leduc Business Park North Leduc Industrial Area Structure Plan C it y of Led u c Prepared for Farm Air Properties Inc. January, 2007 Table of Contents Page Number 1.0 Purpose of Plan and Definition of

More information

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS

BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS 88-323 BOULEVARD AND PARKWAY STANDARDS 88-323-01 PURPOSE Considerable public and private investment exists and is expected to occur adjacent to boulevards and parkways within the city. The following standards

More information

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North.

MEMORANDUM. This memo deals with proposed amendments to previously issued Development Permit No for Park Royal North. MEMORANDUM Date: August 28, 2015 Our File: 1010-20-15-062 To: Design Review Committee From: Lisa Berg, Senior Community Planner Re: Amendment to Development Permit for Park Royal North This memo deals

More information

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: . 4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MID-ATLANTIC AUTO PROPERTY OWNER: DZR, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (truck rental, automobile service, and automotive/bulk

More information

Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University

Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University Institutional Master Plan The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University Submitted to: Boston Redevelopment Authority One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Submitted by: The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University

More information

This application has been applied for with support of an Outline Plan to provide the technical details for the site s development.

This application has been applied for with support of an Outline Plan to provide the technical details for the site s development. Page 1 of 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This application consists of a Land Use Amendment application proposing redesignation from Special Purpose Future Urban Development (S-FUD) District to an assortment of multiresidential,

More information

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and

F. The following uses in the HR District: attached single-family dwellings, condominiums, and institutional uses; and 1102 DESIGN REVIEW 1102.01 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY Section 1102 is adopted to provide standards, criteria, and procedures under which design review may be approved. Design review is required for: A.

More information

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan

City of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan City of Toronto Emery Village Transportation Master Plan May 2009 Emery Village Transportation Master Plan Toronto, ON May 2009 Consulting Inc. 100 York Blvd., Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 Tel:

More information

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents

City of Yelm. Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines. Table of Contents City of Yelm Tahoma Terra Final Master Plan Development Guidelines Table of Contents Table of Contents... 1 Purpose... 2 Low Density Residential (R4-6)... 3 Moderate Density Residential (R6-10)... 5 Neighborhood

More information

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment

Urban Design Brief December 23, 2015 Southside Construction Group Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment Urban Design Brief Proposed Official Plan & Zoning By-Law Amendment 3244, 3263 and 3274 Wonderland Road South Southside Group December 23, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION... 1 SECTION 1 LAND

More information

SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST

SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST City of Seminole 9199 113 th Street N. Seminole, FL 33772 Ph: (727) 392-1966 Fx: (727) 319-6583 SITE PLAN REVIEW ITEMS - REFERENCE CHECKLIST Note: This checklist is designed to aid designers in the review

More information

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church

R E S O L U T I O N. Single-Family Residence/ Church. 2,488 sq. ft. 2,488 sq. ft. Area Parking Required: Church R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George s

More information

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 617-451-2770 fax 614-482-7185 www.mapc.org Serving the 101 Cities Towns in the Metropolitan Boston Region MEMORANDUM TO:

More information

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM DATE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 6A AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL Community Development PUD Concept & Development Stage Plan Preliminary Plat & Final Plat PREVIOUS

More information

Central and East Neighbourhoods - Hermitage Outline Plan

Central and East Neighbourhoods - Hermitage Outline Plan Central and East Neighbourhoods - Hermitage Outline Plan Office Consolidation September 2013 Prepared by: Planning and Policy Services Branch Planning and Development Department City of Edmonton The Central

More information

Capital Projects in and near Odenton Town Center

Capital Projects in and near Odenton Town Center Capital Projects in and near Odenton Town Center Map ID Anne Arundel County Department of Public Works This project provides for the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of approximately

More information

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax

Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts fax Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 617-451-2770 fax 614-482-7185 www.mapc.org Serving the 101 Cities and Towns in the Metropolitan Boston Region MEMORANDUM

More information

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum

Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum Right-of-Way Acquisitions and Relocations Technical Memorandum Southeast Extension Project Lincoln Station to RidgeGate Parkway Prepared for: Federal Transit Administration Prepared by: Denver Regional

More information

Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17)

Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17) Proposed Walkability Ordinance for City of Knoxville (6/16/17) New or revised text is highlighted Section 1: Purpose The purpose of this ordinance is to set requirements for walkability and pedestrian

More information

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts

ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts ARTICLE 6: Special and Planned Development Districts 6-10 Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District 6-10.10 Purpose and Intent The Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND) District provides

More information

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist

Major Subdivision Sketch Plan Checklist This checklist provides specific requirements that are apart of the Sketch process. The entire process is described by the Huntersville Subdivision Review Process which details all the submittal and resubmittal

More information

Olde Towne Vision Plan

Olde Towne Vision Plan Olde Towne Vision Plan Introduction In 2016, the City of Bellevue will complete its move of City offices from Olde Towne Bellevue to its new municipal complex on Wall Street. The City intends to sell its

More information

Directors Rules for Seattle Municipal Code, Chapters Stormwater Code

Directors Rules for Seattle Municipal Code, Chapters Stormwater Code Directors Rules for Seattle Municipal Code, Chapters 22.800 22.808 Stormwater Code Requirements for Green Stormwater Infrastructure to the Maximum Extent Feasible for Single-Family Residential and Parcel-Based

More information

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to:

DRAFT Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 DRAFT AUGUST 29, Goals Land Use. The goals of this Plan are to: AUGUST 29, 2017 12.15 Northeast Quadrant of Kipling Avenue and Highway 7 12.15.1 Goals 12.15.2 Land Use The goals of this Plan are to: 12.15.2.1 General Provisions: a) Ensure the development of a compact

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES CITY OF PORT ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES URBAN SERVICES STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES January 2017 Craig Fulton, P.E., Director TABLE OF CONTENTS "URBAN SERVICES STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES"

More information

City of Cornwall Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Proposed Improvement and Extension of Lemay Street

City of Cornwall Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. Proposed Improvement and Extension of Lemay Street Welcome City of Cornwall Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Proposed Improvement and Extension of Lemay Street Redevelopment and Design of the Municipal Works Yard Public Information Centre #1 Thursday,

More information

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional)

REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional) Rezoning Petition 2016-117 Zoning Committee Recommendation January 4, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: O-15(CD) (office) Proposed Zoning: TOD-M(CD) (transit oriented development mixed-use, conditional) LOCATION

More information

The principal elements of the NTC Strategic Vision plan are as follows.

The principal elements of the NTC Strategic Vision plan are as follows. The proposed project would improve the NTC site plan, circulation, visitor amenities, and landscaping, and would include construction of two new stadiums to replace the existing Louis Armstrong Stadium

More information

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 Rezoning Petition 2017-177 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 16, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: O-2 (office) and MUDD-O (mixed use development, optional) Proposed Zoning: MUDD-O (mixed use development,

More information

Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan

Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan 425 Hillside Avenue Request for Statement of Interest in Implementation of the Roosevelt Road Redevelopment Plan I. INTRODUCTION The is seeking the services of a qualified consulting firm to prepare plans

More information

CRESCENT RESOURCES INC.

CRESCENT RESOURCES INC. CRESCENT RESOURCES INC. Due Diligence Checklist Project Name: Client: Project No. Date: 1 Survey Review survey for compliance with Crescent Resources, Inc. s Instructions to Surveyors (see below): All

More information

CITY of RIDGEFIELD TYPE I DECISION SITE PLAN REVIEW (SPR 99-10) PDM MOLDING INC. PHASE II EXPANSION

CITY of RIDGEFIELD TYPE I DECISION SITE PLAN REVIEW (SPR 99-10) PDM MOLDING INC. PHASE II EXPANSION Page 1 CITY of RIDGEFIELD TYPE I DECISION SITE PLAN REVIEW (SPR 99-10) PDM MOLDING INC. PHASE II EXPANSION TO: Mayor, and Members of the Ridgefield City Council and Planning Commission FROM: Eric Eisemann

More information

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016

PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP. April 5, 2016 PLAN ELEMENTS WORKSHOP April 5, 2016 needs more housing. But there is no one-size fits-all solution. Every neighborhood has its own character. In some places, density is not only appropriate it is badly

More information

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent

COMMUNITY DESIGN. GOAL: Create livable and attractive communities. Intent COMMUNITY DESIGN Intent An attractive, well-designed County will attract quality development, instill civic pride, improve the visual character of the community, and create a strong, positive image for

More information

F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:

F. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following: Section 20.945.040 General Design Standards for Surface Parking Areas. A. Review Authority. Parking lot design and drainage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Transportation Manager. B.

More information

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01

City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01 City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department KENNEDY DEVELOPMENTS LTD. OUTLINE PLAN OP-09-01 July 27, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Plan Area Location & Context... 1 1.2 Ownership

More information

TENTATIVE MAP CHECKLIST

TENTATIVE MAP CHECKLIST Business License 707.648.4357 www.cityofvallejo.net Central Permit Center 555 Santa Clara Street Vallejo CA 94590 Building 707.648.4374 Planning 707.648.4326 TENTATIVE MAP CHECKLIST Public Works/Engineering

More information

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa

FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN. Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa FORMER CANADIAN FORCES BASE (CFB) ROCKCLIFFE SECONDARY PLAN Official Plan Amendment XX to the Official Plan for the City of Ottawa 1 INDEX THE STATEMENT OF COMPONENTS PART A THE PREAMBLE PAGE Purpose...

More information

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018

URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 URBAN DESIGN BRIEF URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 721 FRANKLIN BLVD, CAMBRIDGE August 2018 DESIGN BRIEF CONTENTS PART A 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS OF SITE CONTEXT 3.0 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS AND OPPORTUNITIES

More information

AGENDA ITEM: IOWA. west] that were not FISCAL IMPACT. the City of Clive. STAFF REVIEW. Resolution II. Amendment PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY:

AGENDA ITEM: IOWA. west] that were not FISCAL IMPACT. the City of Clive. STAFF REVIEW. Resolution II. Amendment PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: AGENDA ITEM: CITY OF WAUKEE, IOWA CITY COUNCIL MEETING COMMUNICATION MEETING DATE: March 7, 2016 AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of approval of a resolution approving Engineering Services Amendment No. 1 with

More information

APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW

APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW APPENDIX G: TOWN ORDINANCE REVIEW TYLin (225740) Woodard & Curran SWMP January 2013 Stormwater LID strategies, ranked for Zoning Bylaw and Site Plan Review Standards Dimensional Requirements Permit the

More information

9IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING

9IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING 9IMPLEMENTATION AND PHASING Purpose A key objective of the Railyard Master Plan is the integration of the public and private realm to provide a network of places that connect to and complement Commercial

More information

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION

Planning Districts INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION To facilitate detailed examination of development prospects for all areas of the community, Delano has been divided into 14 planning districts. The location of these planning districts is

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008

Planning Commission Staff Report June 5, 2008 Owner/Applicant Taylor Village Sacramento Investments Partners, LP c/o Kim Whitney 1792 Tribute Road #270 Sacramento, CA 95815 Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Staff Report Project: File: Request:

More information

6. CPRC Group, requests sketch plan review for 70 Pleasant Hill Road, Map R77, Lot 7

6. CPRC Group, requests sketch plan review for 70 Pleasant Hill Road, Map R77, Lot 7 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Planning Board November 20, 2017 1. Call to Order (7:00 P. M.) 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes (October 30, 2017) 4. Rosewood Land Development, Inc., requests sketch plan review

More information

INFRASTRUCTURE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE A. Circulation B. Signals C. Drainage D. Utilities

INFRASTRUCTURE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE A. Circulation B. Signals C. Drainage D. Utilities 7.01. EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE A. Circulation B. Signals C. Drainage D. Utilities 7.02. PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE A. Overall Concept B. Circulation C. Signals D. Drainage 7.03. INFRASTRUCTURE MAP A. Key Infrastructure

More information

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017

LAND USE AMENDMENT DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL CORE (WARD 7) MACLEOD TRAIL SE AND 5 AVENUE SE BYLAW 254D2017 Page 1 of 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Land Use Amendment application seeks to redesignate a full downtown block (currently the YWCA site) from a Direct Control based on the CM-2 District (Land Use Bylaw

More information

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

HEALTH SCIENCES BUILDING REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT INTRODUCTION In recent years, the University of Cincinnati (University) has demonstrated a commitment to identifying and implementing sustainable goals and objectives throughout University s Uptown Campuses.

More information

Access Management: An Overview

Access Management: An Overview Figures 1-5 Below Evolution of development along a highway. In the early stages, land along the road is used for farming with little traffic generated. As time passes, the highway corridor becomes a de

More information

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY

PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY SECONDARY PLAN UPDATE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES September 2015 DRAFT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NUMBER # to the Whitby Official Plan PURPOSE: The intent of this Amendment

More information

WEST WESTFIELD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PARK

WEST WESTFIELD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PARK Prepared For: DRAFT Borough of Roselle Park 110 East Westfield Avenue Roselle Park, New Jersey 07204 2016 WEST WESTFIELD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PARK Prepared By: Neglia Engineering

More information

Preliminary Development Plan 07/ /2

Preliminary Development Plan 07/ /2 OWENSBORO METROPOLITAN PLANNING COMMISSION Preliminary Development Plan 07/06 120 1/2 Development Information The table at right refers to the application materials required for submission, unless otherwise

More information

MEMORANDUM. I2 District Downtown Parking Overlay District 24,000 square feet /.55 acres. Industrial Employment District North Loop Small Area Plan

MEMORANDUM. I2 District Downtown Parking Overlay District 24,000 square feet /.55 acres. Industrial Employment District North Loop Small Area Plan Department of Community Planning & Economic Development 50 South 4th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis, MN 5545-385 MEMORANDUM To: City Planning Commission, Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Peter Crandall,

More information

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier:

Rezoning Transportation Analysis Petition Number: General Location Identifier: From: Kelsie Anderson, PE Kelsie.Anderson@charlottenc.gov 704-432-5492 Staff Reviewer: Kory Hedrick, PE, PMP Khedrick@charlottenc.gov 704-432-6511 CDOT s review of this rezoning petition is intended to

More information

APPENDIX J PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR GRAVEL MINE, PIT MINE, OR QUARRY

APPENDIX J PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR GRAVEL MINE, PIT MINE, OR QUARRY APPENDIX J PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR GRAVEL MINE, PIT MINE, OR QUARRY A. Purpose: 1. Regulatory Requirement and Use Mitigation: The purpose of this appendix is to provide a regulatory context (standards)

More information

CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION

CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL Planning Department 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd phone (919) 968-2728 fa (919) 969-2014 www.townofchapelhill.org Parcel Identifier Number (PIN): 9880267455

More information

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania

APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS. In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania APPENDIX A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FOR SMALL PROJECTS In West Sadsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 II. Importance of Stormwater Management

More information

Public Meeting. US Highway 14 (6TH Street) from Main Ave to Medary Ave Urban Reconstruction Project Brookings, SD P-PH 0014(179)419 PCN 027B

Public Meeting. US Highway 14 (6TH Street) from Main Ave to Medary Ave Urban Reconstruction Project Brookings, SD P-PH 0014(179)419 PCN 027B Public Meeting US Highway 14 (6TH Street) from Main Ave to Medary Ave Urban Reconstruction Project Brookings, SD P-PH 0014(179)419 PCN 027B Mark Leiferman Chief Road Design Engineer April 28, 2014 Why

More information

KANATA CENTRUM 255 KANATA AVENUE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

KANATA CENTRUM 255 KANATA AVENUE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT KANATA CENTRUM 255 KANATA AVENUE OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT JUNE 2015 PREPARED BY: FOTENN Consultants Inc. 223 Mcleod Street Ottawa, ON K2P OZ8 (613) 730-5709 PREPARED FOR: Kanata

More information

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development

Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development CHAPTER 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development Chapter 3 Site Planning and Low Impact Development 3.0 Introduction The City of Charleston requires that major residential, large commercial (>1 acre),

More information

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE

SDOT DPD. SDOT Director s Rule DPD Director s Rule DCLU DR SED DR of 7 CITY OF SEATTLE SDOT SDOT Director s Rule 2-07 DPD Applicant: CITY OF SEATTLE Page 1 of 7 Supersedes: DCLU DR 11-93 SED DR 93-4 Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) Department of Planning and Development (DPD)

More information

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN

ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN ELMVALE ACRES SHOPPING CENTRE MASTER PLAN Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 2 2.0 LOCATION... 2 3.0 EXISTING CONTEXT... 2 4.0 VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES... 2 5.0 LAND USE AND BUILT FORM... 4 5.1 St. Laurent

More information

8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing

8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing 8 October 14, 2015 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: PRICE S HOLDINGS, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Lasley REQUEST: A. Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair Garage) B. Change in Nonconforming

More information

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement

East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement East Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement Alternatives Considered Operating Plan The requirements for opening day operations versus year 2030 are based on ridership and operations. Opening day

More information

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General

ARTICLE 13 STREETS General ARTICLE 13 STREETS 13.1 General Streets shall be designed to suit their functions. Many streets have purposes other than vehicular traffic. As an alternative to current N.C. Department of Transportation

More information

NORTH BETHANY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ASSESSMENT

NORTH BETHANY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ASSESSMENT NORTH BETHANY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Prepared by: October 10, 2014 Page 2 Introduction and Purpose This report provides an assessment of two potential sites for a new elementary

More information

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH

112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG PGH 112th Avenue Light Rail Options Concept Design Report JUNE 2010 PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY TBG060310124909PGH C ontents Introduction 1 Project Overview 1 Public Involvement and Technical Coordination 4 Description

More information

PDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx

PDR /21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx PDR150001 1/21/15 Noah Beals 1/7/15 xx 01.07.15 HTP Harmony Frontage Infrastructure Preliminary Design Review Project Narrative a) What are you proposing/use? The HTP Harmony Frontage Infrastructure project

More information