Bike / Pedestrian Count Project
|
|
- Morgan Lawrence
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Bike / Pedestrian Count Project October Introduction In, the Capitol Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) updated the Regional Bike/Ped Plan, The CRCOG Commitment to a Walkable and Bikeable Region. The plan highlights the positive impacts that walking and bicycling can have on local and state economies as well as on our overall health, air quality, and mobility. The plan also lists a set of recommended action steps that CRCOG will carry out in an effort to support the communities in our region in their Bike/Ped planning. Collecting bicycling and pedestrian data falls under recommendations. and. in the plan. The plan provides a snapshot of the current walking and bicycling patterns in our region, however, much of the data represents commuters traveling to and from work. At this time, there is no data source that allows us to truly understand what mode choices people are using for recreation or everyday activities in our region. Whereas vehicle counts are typically conducted as part of standard traffic studies, and bus ridership figures are collected to study ridership, there is not a comparable effort to collect data on bicycle and pedestrian volumes. In September 9, CRCOG participated in the National Bike/Ped Documentation Project (NBPD), a project sponsored by the Institute of Transportation Engineers and co-sponsored by Alta + Planning and Design. The nationwide effort provides a consistent model of data collection and ongoing data for use by planners, governments, and bicycle and pedestrian professionals. The purpose of the project is to encourage agencies nationwide to start conducting bicycle/pedestrian counts and surveys in a consistent manner similar to motor vehicle counts. Working in conjunction with the NBPD, we modified the count and instruction forms to represent our region. The purpose of participating in the NBPD was to initiate a bicyclist/pedestrian data collection program for the Capitol Region.
2 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project The 9 count was limited in scope, and in, counts were taken at even fewer locations. In, we expanded the program to include dozens of counters and locations. The extended count was undertaken again in. In all years, we counted in September, during the designated national count period. In, we were able to obtain automatic count data from a counter that was placed on the Hop River Trail in Bolton. We obtained data for September of 9 and. This report updates our earlier work with the count results but does not yet include results. Count Methodology/Implementation It was determined by CRCOG staff that counts would be conducted at intersections (including where paths/trails crossed) and screen line counts would be conducted on trails. In addition, it was determined that bicyclists and pedestrians would be counted at each location, as opposed to bicycle-only or pedestrian-only counts. We developed count forms and detailed instructions for our volunteers. The NBPD recommended that counts take place the second week of September, : to : PM during the weekday and : to : PM during the weekend. We modified the count period to take place at : to : PM during the weekday period which represents the standard peak commute times in our region. We also counted some trails between PM and PM on the weekend, as local trail advocates indicated that was the actual peak for the trail. We chose to conduct only weekday counts at those locations where we expected to measure bicycle commuting. We did both weekend and weekday counts at most trail locations. We were somewhat limited by availability of counters for the intersection counts and so counted most of those locations on weekdays only. Both bicyclist and pedestrians were counted and recorded on an intersection diagram. Bicyclists were recorded by the direction they approached the intersection and their destination (turning right, going straight, and turning left.) Counters also recorded if a bicyclist was travelling the wrong way or riding on the sidewalk. Pedestrians were counted as they crossed the intersection and recorded for the appropriate crosswalk. Diagonal crossings by pedestrians were also recorded. The counter noted if a pedestrian was using a wheelchair or cane, pushing a stroller, or using a skateboard or roller blades. Bicyclists and pedestrians counted were recorded by male and female. Screenline counters counted bicyclists and pedestrians who passed an imaginary line across the trail or roadway being counted. The following page shows the count forms used for the and counts (these are slight modifications of the 9, forms.)
3 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project
4 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project Count Summaries and Findings Table represents a summary of the total bicyclist/pedestrian counts for the three years of counting. In 9, we counted locations and counted over, bicyclists and pedestrians. In we had increased our program to 9 locations and counted more than, bicyclists and pedestrians. As we increased our count locations, we also increased the number of bicyclists counted, as compared to the first year. Notably, in, we counted almost an equal number of bicyclists and pedestrians in our weekend counts, whereas in the first year, the percent of bicyclists in both weekday and weekend counts was much smaller. It should be noted, that with the automatic counts in (on the Hop River Trail in Bolton), we were unable to determine if trail users were bicyclists or pedestrians or male or female. Therefore, those counts are not included in any of these summary tables. TABLE SUMMARY OF COUNTS Weekday Weekend Totals Number % Number % Number % Bicyclists* 9.%.% 9.% Pedestrians 9 9.%.%.% Total 9.%.%.% Total No. of Count Locations 9 9 Weekday Weekend Totals Number % Number % Number % Bicyclists 9 9.9% 99.9% 9 9.% Pedestrians.% 9.%.% Total.%.%.% Total No. of Count Locations Weekday Weekend Totals 9 Number % Number % Number % Bicyclists.%.% 9.% Pedestrians 9.%.%.% Total 9.%.%.% Total No. of Count Locations Table * Note, in shows, machine the counts counts by were female/male used for a and few locations shows that on trails. with We each attributed year we all have automatic counted counts greater to numbers bicyclists. of female bicyclists, and greater numbers of male pedestrians. Again, it needs to be noted, that we did not include the Bolton automatic counts in this summary. TABLE Female Male* Number % Number % Bicyclists*.%.% Pedestrian.%.% Total.% 9.% Female Male Number % Number % Bicyclists.9%.% Pedestrian 9.%.% Total.9%.% 9 Female 9 Male Number % Number % Bicyclists 9.9%.% Pedestrian.% 9 9.% Total.9%.% * In we used automatic counters for some trails. We attributed all automatic counts to male bicyclists.
5 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project The following graphs show how bicyclists were operating on the roads at the count locations. (we do not show data from because most of the counts that year were on trails, and very few roadway bicyclists were counted.) In 9, most roadway bicyclists counted were on the sidewalk (%), only % were riding on the roadway with traffic. In, the number of bicyclists counted on the road riding with traffic increased to % and the number riding on the sidewalk decreased to %. We don t know if this shows an improvement in bicyclist behavior or if this resulted because of the count locations selected. As the program continues and the same locations are counted each year, we will be able to evaluate trends for riding behavior. 9 Roadways Cyclist Maneuvers % % Riding with Traffic % Riding Against Traffic % Riding on Sidewalk % % Roadways Cyclist Maneuvers % % Riding with Traffic % Riding Against Traffic % Riding on Sidewalk % % The next two charts show the difference in female bicyclist and male bicyclist behavior relative to riding position. The findings are very interesting, with a majority of women preferring sidewalk riding in the 9 count, and few riding with traffic. In, this is flipped, with female bicyclists preferring to ride on the road over sidewalk riding. More years of data may
6 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project show whether this is a trend or an anomaly based upon count locations in 9. Male bicyclists also rode more often on the sidewalk in the 9 count, and in they were split evenly between riding on the sidewalk and riding with traffic. Both sexes decreased riding against traffic..% 9 Roadway Totals.%.%.%.%.9%.%.%.%.% 9.9%.%.%.%.% 9.%.% Riding With Traffic Riding Against Traffic Riding on the Sidewalk Male Bicyclist Female Bicyclist Total.%.% Roadway Totals.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.9%.99%.9%.% Riding With Traffic Riding Against Traffic Riding on the Sidewalk Male Bicyclist Female Bicyclist Total The charts showing riding behavior by sex can be somewhat misleading without understanding how many males and females were actually counted on the roadways. The following charts show that the percentage of females counted on the roadways has actually declined from 9 to. And the actual count of females riding on the road decreased from 9 to ( to ). So while the chart above seems to indicate a nearly equivalent number of male and female
7 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project bicyclists riding on the roadways, in fact, the number of men riding on the roadways far exceeds the number of women 9 Roadways Male/ Female Bicyclists % 9 Female 9 Male % The next three charts show the split in male/female bicyclists on trails:
8 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project Next steps The count data and database used to summarize the data are a very rich source of information, limited only by the manpower available to analyze and evaluate the data. It would be useful to develop standard queries for the database that would enable us to extract the data for individual towns and locations and then share that information with the towns, for their own analysis. Going forward CRCOG might want to develop a program of counting locations every other year. This might make the counting program more manageable. Additionally, CRCOG should investigate how to incorporate more automatic counters into the program, as this method of counting could lead to understanding of bicycle and pedestrian peaks by type of facility, by time of day, day of week, and month of year. Detailed Count Information The following pages provide detailed information on the counts. The first table summarizes the bike and pedestrian counts, by location, for each year of the count. The counts have been completed, but have not yet been entered into our database for evaluation. The second table
9 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project gives the list of count location ID numbers and actual locations. The final set of pages gives the detailed results for each location that was counted at least once from 9 to. 9
10 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project
11 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project
12 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project
13 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project
14 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project CRCOG_ID Municipality Street Street AV Avon Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Fisher Dr. Route / AV Avon Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Country Club Road BO Bolton Hop River Trail Steeles Crossing Road BO Bolton Camp Meeting Town line BO Bolton Route Town Line CA Canton Farmington River Trail Bridge St. / Front St. CA Canton Farmington River Trail Bridge St. / Center St. CA Canton Farmington River Trail Center St. / Maple Ave. CA Canton Farmington River Trail Bridge St/River St CA Canton Farmington River Trail Maple/ Allen Intersection CA Canton Farmington River Trail Route EG East Granby Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Bridge EG East Granby Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Route EH East Hartford Silver Lane Applegate Lane EH East Hartford Charter Oak Greenway Forbes Street EL Ellington Route Route EL Ellington Route Route FA Farmington Farmington Canal Heritage Trial Red Oak Hill Road FA Farmington Farmington River Trail Route FA Farmington Farmington River Trail Route Tunnel FA Farmington Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Brickyard Road GL Glastonbury Main St. Hebron Ave. GL Glastonbury Hebron Ave. New London Turnpike GL Glastonbury Main St. Douglas Rd. HF Hartford Franklin Ave. Brown St. HF Hartford Founders Bridge HF Hartford Bulkeley Bridge HF Hartford Charter Oak Bridge HF Hartford Asylum Ave. Sigourney St. HF Hartford Farmington Ave. Sisson Ave. HF Hartford Farmington Ave. Sigourney St. HF Hartford Farmington Ave. Whitney St. HF9 Hartford Farmington Ave Woodland St. HF Hartford Main St. North of Park HF Hartford Washington St. Park St. HF Hartford Capitol Laurel HF Hartford Church St. High St. HF Hartford Main St. Pleasant St. HF Hartford Park St. Park Terrace MC Manchester Charter Oak Greenway Main St./ Hartford Rd. MC Manchester Middle Turnpike Wickham Park, across Fountain Village Apt. MC Manchester Clark St. Chapel Rd.
15 Capitol Region Council of Governments - Bike / Pedestrian Count Project NE Newington Main St. Cedar St. NE Newington Cedar St. Willard Ave. NE Newington Cedar St Fenn Rd. NE Newington Willard Ave. West Hill Rd. NE Newington Linear Greenway Griswoldville RH Rocky Hill Route Route (Cromwell/ New Britain Ave) SI Simsbury Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Sand Hill Road SI Simsbury Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Route (Bidwells/ Old Agway) SI Simsbury Farmington Canal Heritage Trail Route / SU Suffield Farmington Canal Heritage Trail North of Phelps Rd. SW South Windsor Bissell Bridge Old Main SW South Windsor Buckland Road Tamarack WH West Hartford Farmington Ave. LaSalle Rd. WH West Hartford Farmington Ave. Main St. WH West Hartford Boulevard Quaker Ln WH West Hartford Boulevard Prospect Ave. WH West Hartford Asylum Ave. Quaker Ln. WH West Hartford Fern Rd. Quaker Ln. WI Windsor Broad St. Maple Ave.
16 Bike/Pedestrian Count Details ################### Avon CRCOG ID: AV Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
17 CRCOG ID: AV Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 Page of
18 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
19 Bolton CRCOG ID: BO Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Rural - High Scenic Qualities - None - Good System Connections (both ends) - > Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Under, ADT - - MPH -, -, Feet - Minimal (X-Walks only) - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of
20 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of
21 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday (AM - PM) Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of
22 Date: 9// Time Period: Weather Condition: Count Type: Screenline Page of
23 Canton CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
24 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page 9 of
25 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
26 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of
27 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
28 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of
29 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: Weather Condition: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 9 Page of
30 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
31 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
32 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
33 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
34 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page 9 of
35 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 9 Page of
36 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
37 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
38 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
39 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
40 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
41 CRCOG ID: CA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Very High Traffic (>, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
42 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
43 East Granby CRCOG ID: EG Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Rural - High Scenic Qualities - None - Good System Connections (both ends) - > Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every, -, Feet - Minimal (X-Walks only) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
44 CRCOG ID: EG Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Rural - High Scenic Qualities - None - Good System Connections (both ends) - > Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Every, -, Feet - Minimal (X-Walks only) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page 9 of
45 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 Page of
46 East Hartford CRCOG ID: EH Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Suburban - Poor Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of
47 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
48 CRCOG ID: EH Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Limited Connections (one end only Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): -, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
49 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
50 Ellington CRCOG ID: EL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Rural Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - No Connections, Poor Access - Part of Sidewalk Network - Poor Direct Access from Adj Neighborhoods - Poor Community System of Bikeways or Walkways -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every, -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Poor Condition (Rough Surf, Vandalism,Debrs)i - Moderate Grades Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of
51 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Page of
52 CRCOG ID: EL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Suburban Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - High Scenic Qualities - No Connections, Poor Access - Poor Direct Access from Adj Neighborhoods - Poor Community System of Bikeways or Walkways -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every, -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: Page of
53 Farmington CRCOG ID: FA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
54 CRCOG ID: FA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Very High Traffic (>, ADTs) Condition: Topography: - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page 9 of
55 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
56 CRCOG ID: FA Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - > Miles Access: - Excellent Access, Including Trailheads Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): -, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Minimal (X-Walks only) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page of
57 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
58 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page of
59 Glastonbury CRCOG ID: GL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Sidewalk (>=Ft. Wide) - Suburban Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - Limited Connections (one end only - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Good Community System (Continuous, Good Cond) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
60 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of
61 CRCOG ID: GL Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: - Sidewalk (>=Ft. Wide) - Suburban Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - Limited Connections (one end only - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Good Community System (Continuous, Good Cond) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - All Minor Streets (<, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
62 Hartford CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
63 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
64 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page 9 of
65 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
66 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 99 Page of
67 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of
68 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
69 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of
70 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of
71 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: 9 Page of
72 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
73 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Urban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - < Mile - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday (-9AM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Count Type: Screenline Page of
74 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Extreme (Hvy Rain, Snow, Very Humid, Over 9d) Count Type: Screenline Page 9 of
75 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday (-9AM) Weather Condition: - Poor ( - d, 9-9d, Lgt Rain, Wind) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Poor ( - d, 9-9d, Lgt Rain, Wind) Count Type: Screenline,,, Page of
76 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Poor ( - d, 9-9d, Lgt Rain, Wind) Count Type: Screenline Page of
77 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday (-9AM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
78 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline 9 9 Page of
79 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Sidewalk (>=Ft. Wide) - Urban - High Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - < Mile - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - None - Minimal (X-Walks only) - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
80 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Count Type: Screenline Page of
81 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
82 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Page of
83 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
84 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page 9 of
85 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
86 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
87 CRCOG ID: HF Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
88 Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
89 CRCOG ID: HF9 Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Street or Road w/no Shoulders or <Ft. Wide - Urban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Good System Connections (both ends) - Part of Sidewalk Network - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) -, -, ADT - - MPH - Every -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Level Year: 9 Date: 9/9/9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
90 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
91 Date: 9//9 Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
92 Manchester CRCOG ID: MC Type Of Facility: Type of Setting: Scenic Quality: Schools, Parks, etc: Quality of Connecting Facilities: Length of Facility: Access: Quality of Overall Network: Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): Crossing and Intersection Protection: Crossing and Intersection Traffic: Condition: Topography: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet - Suburban - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities - and over - Limited Connections (one end only - - Miles - Adequate Access - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) - Over, ADT - - MPH -, -, Feet - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekend ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page of
93 Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
94 CRCOG ID: MC Type Of Facility: - Paved Multi Use Path at least feet Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - Neutral or Better Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Good System Connections (both ends) Length of Facility: - - Miles Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: Traffic Speed: Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to High Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) Page 9 of
95 CRCOG ID: MC Type Of Facility: - Street or Road with Marked Shoulders(ft.wide) Type of Setting: - Suburban Scenic Quality: - High Scenic Qualities Schools, Parks, etc: - - Quality of Connecting Facilities: - Limited Connections (one end only Length of Facility: - Part of Sidewalk Network Access: - Adequate Access Quality of Overall Network: - Adequate Community System (Intermittent) Traffic Volumes of Adjacent Road: -, -, ADT Traffic Speed: - - MPH Crossings and Intersections (Average): - Every, -, Feet Crossing and Intersection Protection: - Adequate (X-Walks, Stop SIgns, and Signals) Crossing and Intersection Traffic: - Minor to Moderate Traffic (, -, ADTs) Condition: - Good Condition (Smooth Surf, Good Maint.) Topography: - Moderate Grades Year: Date: 9// Time Period: - Weekday ( - PM) Weather Condition: - Acceptable (-9d, no rain) 9 9 Page of
Tolland Turnpike Manchester Q1 final design submission re-scheduled from 7/31/2017 to 10/27/2017
241 Main Street / Hartford / Connecticut / 06106 Phone (860) 522-2217 / Fax (860) 724-1274 www.crcog.org To: From: Cost Review Subcommittee Sotoria Montanari, Program Manager Date: November 3, 2017 c:
More informationOpen Space and Farmland Preservation
Vibrant. Green. Connected. Competitive. Open Space and Farmland Preservation Statement of Purpose The purpose of this section of the Plan is to encourage and support the preservation of open space areas
More informationPedestrian Annual Count Report
Pedestrian Annual Count Report 2016 Table of contents Contents Overview 1 Materials and methodology 5 Results 10 Appendix A 13 Contact Information Jordan Kocak, Pedestrian and Bicycle Coordinator Jordan.Kocak@hennepin.us
More informationTOWN BRANCH COMMONS & VINE STREET MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS
TOWN BRANCH COMMONS & VINE STREET MOBILITY IMPROVEMENTS CONTACT: Jeff Fugate, President O: 859-367-4972 F: 859-425-2292 JFugate@LexingtonDDA.com www.lexingtondda.com TOWN BRANCH COMMONS & VINE STREET MOBILITY
More informationRoute 347. New York State Department of Transportation Region 10, Long Island. THE GREENING of ROUTE 347
The GREENING of Route 347 The Greening of Route 347 The Greening of Route 347: History 3 The Greening of Route 347 4 The Greening of Route 347 5 The Greening of Route 347 Smith Haven Mall 6 The Greening
More informationWelcome. Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012
Welcome Comprehensive Plan & Transportation Plan Open House November 7, 2012 Agenda Proposed future land use plan Comprehensive Plan strategies Traffic forecasts Future traffic operations Possible future
More informationSecrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018
Secrest Short Cut and Monroe Expressway Small Area Plan AUGUST 29, 2018 Background and Process Monroe Expressway will be open by the end of 2018 Union County and Indian Trail identified a need to revisit
More information1.0 Introduction. Purpose and Basis for Updating the TMP. Introduction 1
1.0 Introduction The Town of Castle Rock is situated between the metropolitan areas of Denver and Colorado Springs, amidst a unique terrain of rolling hills, mesas, ravines, and waterways. Like many Front
More informationMALLETTS BAY INITIATIVE
MALLETTS BAY INITIATIVE Stormwater Management & Transportation Scoping Study January 19, 2017 Project Team Bryan Osborne Director of Public Works Sarah Hadd Director of Planning & Zoning Marshall Distel
More information2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Adopted: April 15, 2013 APPENDIX D HIGHWAY NEEDS PLAN PROJECTS FREDERICKSBURG Existing and Committed Projects Fall Hill Avenue/Mary Washington Blvd. (Fredericksburg)
More informationDate: April 10, 2017 City Council Work Session April 24, 2017: Status Report on the Comprehensive Plan Update and Transportation Master Plan
AGENDA REPORT To: From: By: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Warren Hutmacher, City Manager Sharon Ebert, Director Community Development Date: April 10, 2017 Agenda: City Council Work Session April
More informationGreat Rivers Greenway CLEAN GREEN CONNEC TED T RAILS
Great Rivers CLEAN GREEN CONNEC TED T RAILS Great Rivers (GRG) was established in 2000 to create a clean, green, connected St. Louis region. Today, many new and exciting projects demonstrate the social,
More informationPOLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
July 26, 2018 POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PHASE Agenda 1. Welcome and introductions. 2. Overview of project activities. 3. Community Advisory Committee update. 4. Public engagement
More informationAsbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan
Asbury Chapel Subdivision Sketch Plan PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: NVR Inc. Project Size: +/- 76.13 acres Parcel Numbers: 02101112,02116101,02116112, 02116113 Current Zoning: Transitional Residential
More informationRoute 1 Corridor Study
Route 1 Corridor Study Westbrook, Connecticut A Vision for the Connecticut Shoreline Public Informational Meeting July 28, 2015 Lower Connecticut River Valley Council of Governments Fitzgerald & Halliday,
More informationFinish Roanoke River Greenway from Green Hill Park to the Blue Ridge Parkway Regional Surface Transportation Program Application
Finish Roanoke River Greenway from Green Hill Park to the Blue Ridge Parkway Regional Surface Transportation Program Application 1. Project Sponsors: City of Roanoke, City of Salem, Roanoke County, Town
More informationIssues, Challenges & Opportunities
Below is a summary of issues, challenges, and opportunities relating to the revitalization of Downtown Romeoville and potential development of the Village s East Side TOD Area. Current Issues & Challenges
More informationMunicipal Class EA Study Public Information Centre No. 1 December 13, :00 pm 7:00 pm. Please sign in so we can keep you updated on this study
Reconstruction of Regional Road 45 (Creek Road) Between Regional Road 27 (River Road) and Regional Road 63 (Canborough Road) in the Township of Wainfleet Municipal Class EA Study Public Information Centre
More informationPublic input has been an important part of the plan development process.
Lakewood s Comprehensive Plan recognizes that transportation helps shape the community, and that the way the community provides for the safe and efficient movement of people affects the character of the
More informationMary Hills Nature Area. Roadway Lighting. The Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology Courage Kenny Rehabilitation Institute
PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS Mary Hills Nature Area Enhanced Programming Glenview Terrace Valley View Roadway Lighting Enhanced Streetscape Trail Lighting / Roadway Lighting Wayfinding Public Art The Minneapolis
More informationPEARSON OPEN HOUSE #2 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK REPORT PEARSON OPEN HOUSE #2 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK REPORT ( )
PEARSON OPEN HOUSE #2 QUESTIONNAIRE FEEDBACK REPORT (2013 07 10) 1 INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Approximately 200 people attended the June 6 th and 8 th open houses for Pearson Dogwood Lands. The City of Vancouver
More informationReconstruction Project. Wayzata Task Force Meeting September 3, 2009
CSAH 101 Reconstruction Project Wayzata Task Force Meeting September 3, 2009 Agenda 700 7:00 Re-Introductions ti 7:05 2008 Activity Recap / 2009 Activities-to-date 7:10 Discussion of Layout Revisions (per
More information4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07
4-Town Comprehensive Plan DRAFT 7/30/07 Acknowledgements ning Committee Town of Harrisburg Norman Roof Randy Nicol Town of Martinsburg Terry Thisse Paul Kelly Town of Montague Jan Bagdanowicz Wendy Perry
More informationPublic Meeting Final Recommendations August 8, 2013
Public Meeting Final Recommendations August 8, 2013 Meeting Agenda 1. Existing Conditions 2. Plan Building Blocks & Process 3. The Plan Policies 4. What we heard 5. Next Steps Existing Conditions Existing
More informationKensington Center. Public Meeting # Transit-Oriented Development, Town of Berlin, CT
Kensington Center Public Meeting #1 10.27.16 Transit-Oriented Development, Town of Berlin, CT CivicMoxie 2016 What is Transit-Oriented Development Definition: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) = is an
More informationPennDOT Public Meeting. S.R. 3044, Section A01 Castle Shannon Boulevard Roadway Improvement Project
PennDOT Public Meeting S.R. 3044, Section A01 Castle Shannon Boulevard Roadway Improvement Project Mt Lebanon Township, Allegheny County Mt Lebanon Township Municipal Building November 6, 2014 1 Project
More informationI-84 HARTFORD PROJECT HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
I-84 HARTFORD PROJECT HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT DRAFT PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT October 2016 I. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The City of Hartford is the capital of Connecticut, and the largest employment
More informationRich Valley Greenway Master Plan. Central Greenway Connectivity Study
Rich Valley Greenway Master Plan Central Greenway Connectivity Study Dakota County Planning Commission February, 2017 Rich Valley Greenway Master Plan Dakota County Greenway Vision Establish a County-wide
More informationCHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation
AGLE AREA COMMUNITY Plan CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 7: Transportation, Mobility and Circulation Transportation, Mobility and Circulation The purpose of the Transportation, Mobility and Circulation Chapter is to
More informationUnique. Livable. Connected. Sustainable. Anticipate and Manage Change. Variety of Housing Choices. Enhanced Arterial Corridors
Neighborhood Vision The Old Town Neighborhoods are Unique, Livable, Connected, and Sustainable. As mature, established neighborhoods, many of the ideas and opportunities expressed by stakeholders in support
More information1. Lenox Dale Community Character Strengths and Opportunities Identified by Residents: Strong neighborhood identity and sense of community.
LENOX DALE ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES -- EIGHT CATEGORIES: Concerns and opportunities identified by Lenox residents and in previous Community Surveys, along with thought-starter suggestions on possible Town
More informationSH 199 Corridor Master Plan. Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017
Community Meeting No. 2 May 31, 2017 Transportation Projects On or Near SH 199 SH 199 from 0.3 miles south of FM 1886 to south end of Lake Worth bridge Construct freeway mainlanes and frontage roads 10-Year
More informationComplete Streets Master Plan for Downtown New Britain CRCOG Transportation Committee Meeting Monday, December 9, 2013
CRCOG Transportation Committee Meeting Monday, December 9, 2013 Introduction Why the Project was Initiated About Downtown New Britain Master Plan Goals Master Plan Overview Master Plan Study Areas and
More informationThis Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:
Semiahmoo Town Centre Review The purpose of this review: To review the Semiahmoo Town Centre Concept Plan, originally approved in 1993, to ensure that this centre will continue to serve the needs of South
More informationTransit-Oriented Development
Transit-Oriented Development Path to Sustainability West Windsor February 22, 2007 George S. Hawkins Context for Presentation NJ Future is a non-partisan, 501(c)3 non-profit organization. Offer perspective,
More informationExisting Conditions Assessment. August 18, 2016
Existing Conditions Assessment August 18, 2016 1 Overview Existing Conditions Assessments 1 2 3 4 Site Conditions Land Use + Zoning Market Transportation + Parking Opportunities and Constraints 2 Site
More informationPART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY. The application is Attachment A. The site plan is Attachment B.
Belleterre Subdivision Sketch Plan Town Board 8.7.17 Belleterre Subdivision Sketch Plan PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: Bowman Development Project Size: +/- 20.85 acres Parcel Number: 01115104 and 01115121
More informationSt. Clair Avenue West Area Transportation Master Plan
1 (Between Keele Street and Old Weston Road) Public Information Centre 1 December 2, 2015 2 Welcome Welcome to the first Public Information Centre for the St. Clair Avenue West Area. The panels will present
More informationTown of New Scotland. Public Workshop. Visioning / Planning the Future of this Hamlet. New Scotland Hamlet Master Plan.
Public Workshop Visioning / Planning the Future of this Hamlet December 1, 2011 Voorheesville High School Commons Agenda I. Presentation Project Introduction The Study Area Existing Conditions Outcomes
More informationImprove Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution
HOW TO Planning Guide Improve Neighborhood Design and Reduce Non Point Source Water Pollution This document was funded by a grant from the New Hampshire Coastal Program with funding from the National Oceanic
More informationMeridian. Pathways Master Plan 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS. Needs Overview. Recreational Needs. Utilitarian Needs
Meridian Pathways Master Plan 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS Needs Overview This section provides an overview of user needs identified for the City s pathways system. The existing pathways system currently attracts
More informationNew York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary
New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project Public Meeting #1 Summary I. King Jordan Student Academic Center (SAC) Gallaudet University, Washington, DC February 23, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...
More informationSection4 Design Vision & Implementation Plan
Section4 Design Vision & Implementation Plan W Woodschurch Rd 4.1 Design Focus Areas The Framework Plan is simply the starting point for directing the design and implementation of a wide range of transportation
More informationAccess Management: An Overview
Figures 1-5 Below Evolution of development along a highway. In the early stages, land along the road is used for farming with little traffic generated. As time passes, the highway corridor becomes a de
More informationTown of Avon Village Center. A New Village Center for Avon October, 2015
Town of Avon Village Center A New Village Center for Avon October, 2015 A busy Avon Center approx. 1940 The Avon Town Center Study: In 2004 the Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) undertook the Avon
More informationCHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS. Noble 2025 Vision Statement
CHAPTER 7: VISION AND ACTION STATEMENTS This chapter presents the vision, policy and action statements that transform the comprehensive planning study, an analysis of Noble s past, future trends and community
More informationLambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements
Lambeth Main Street Streetscape Improvements Open House October 5th, 2017 Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Project Background 3. Context 4. Project Objectives 5. Design Principles & Approach 6. Streetscape Design
More informationWelcome to the. Open House
Welcome to the 5th Street to Kinsman Road Open House November 14 5:30 7:00 p.m. Please sign in Project Overview In December 2016, City Council adopted SW 5th Street as the preferred alignment to connect
More informationWhitehurst Freeway Deconstruction Feasibility Study
Whitehurst Freeway Deconstruction Feasibility Study Draft Existing Conditions Report Prepared By: For: District Department of Transportation District of Columbia October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...1-1
More informationPROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GLEN ABBEY GOLF CLUB. STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY (excerpt from the Urban Design Brief) TOWN OF OAKVILLE.
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GLEN ABBEY GOLF CLUB STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY (excerpt from the Urban Design Brief) TOWN OF OAKVILLE OCTOBER, 2016 for 2.4.2 STREETS Streets are the single largest component
More informationEvaluation of Strobe Lights in Red Lens of Traffic Signals
36 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1495 Evaluation of Strobe Lights in Red Lens of Traffic Signals BENJAMIN H. COTTRELL, JR. Strobe lights are used as a supplement to the red lens to draw the attention
More informationLower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013
Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013 DRAFT TOWNSHIP-WIDE VISION: To maintain and enhance commercial areas to complement the surrounding high-quality residential
More informationOld Town Neighborhoods Plan. Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015
Old Town Neighborhoods Plan Choices Event Wednesday, December 9, 2015 Agenda 6:00 6:10 p.m. Welcome + Sign In 6:10 6:30 p.m. Presentation 6:30 8:00 p.m. Workshop + Open House Seeking your input on: Neighborhood
More informationRef: March 21, Ms. Jody Kablack Director of Planning and Community Development Town of Sudbury 278 Old Sudbury Road Sudbury, MA 01776
35 New England Business Center Drive Suite 140 Andover, MA 01810-1066 Office: 978-474-8800 Fax: 978-688-6508 Web: www.rdva.com Ref: 7198 Director of Planning and Community Development Town of Sudbury 278
More informationCLACKAMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 2051 Kaen Road, Oregon City BCC Hearing Room - 4th Floor. LAND USE HEARING October 3, :30 AM
CLACKAMAS COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES BUILDING 150 BEAVERCREEK ROAD OREGON CITY, OR 97045 503-742-4500 ZONINGINFO@CLACKAMAS.US
More informationCity Avenue Official Map Workshop Meeting Notes
City Avenue Official Map Workshop Meeting Notes Saturday, January 28, 2012 10:00 12:00 p.m. GSB Building 1 Belmont Avenue (City Ave & Belmont Ave), 12 th Floor Bala Cynwyd, PA The City Avenue Official
More informationBiscuit Run Gateway. TJPDC staff recommends combining the following projects:
Biscuit Run Gateway I. Summary: The Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission recommends that the Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board vote to combine several existing projects on the Long
More informationProposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Strategies DRAFT for discussion June 28, 2017 Land Use Rural Areas Refine the Farm and Forest area (FF) Update FF boundaries to account for existing lots less than five acres
More informationTOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION
Workshop #3 TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION January 20, 2011 Consultant Team In Attendance Tonight BMS Design Group Nevada City and San Francisco Michael Smiley, AICP, ASLA Partner-in-Charge Nancy L.
More informationTricia Millington, RLA New York State Department of Transportation
Tricia Millington, RLA New York State Department of Transportation pmillington@dot.state.ny.us Context Sensitive Principles: Context Sensitive Solutions is a philosophy wherein safe transportation solutions
More informationB. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION
Executive Summary A. INTRODUCTION Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company ( Metro-North or the Project Sponsor ) is proposing the construction of a new, expanded parking garage at 50 Haarlem Avenue (formerly
More informationBROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION
BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION June 15, 2015 Revised: August 1, 2016 I. VISION Brookhill is a proposed community based upon the principles of Albemarle County
More informationAPPROVED Minutes Regional Planning Commission Meeting West Hartford Town Hall, 50 South Main Street, West Hartford, CT Thursday, March 8, pm
241 Main Street / Hartford / Connecticut / 06106 Phone (860) 522-2217 / Fax (860) 724-1274 www.crcog.org APPROVED Minutes Regional Planning Commission Meeting West Hartford Town Hall, 50 South Main Street,
More informationPipeline Trail Master Plan Preliminary Concept Design. O Connor Mokrycke Consultants May 14, 2015 meeting
Pipeline Trail Master Plan Preliminary Concept Design O Connor Mokrycke Consultants May 14, 2015 meeting 1 Purpose of the Meeting: - Share information regarding traffic studies - Present ideas arising
More informationTRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOAL I: To create and maintain a safe, efficient and aesthetic transportation system that encourages multi-modal transportation and promotes the mobility strategies of the Ocala
More informationSouth Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT
South Davis County COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT Davis/SLC Community Connector Bus Rapid Transit line connecting SLC & Davis County RTP Phase 1 Project Generate 3,100 average weekday riders Relieve congestion on
More informationRutherford County Projects
Rutherford Projects 5307 Urban Operating for Rover Public Transit - Relax & Ride Service TIP # 2005-006 Transit Operations Murfreesboro Public Transit Rutherford Length 0.00 Regional Plan ID Consistent
More information4 Circulation. Master Plan Recommendations: Access and
45 4 Circulation Master Plan Recommendations: Access and 46 Chapter 4 MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS: Access and Circulation Access and Circulation Lake Calhoun/Bde Maka Ska and Lake Harriet are heavily used
More informationSAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IN A PLANNED COMMUNITY
DALE CITY TLC SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IN A PLANNED COMMUNITY PROJECT KICKOFF MEETING MARCH 7, 2016 AGENDA 1. Introductions 2. Project Overview 3. Discussion 4. Site Visit PROJECT KICKOFF MEETING MARCH
More informationCourthouse Planning Area
Courthouse Planning Area Current Reality The Courthouse Planning Area is the characterized by expansive suburbanscale residential areas as well as the community resource planned area of athletic, educational,
More informationCommittee Meeting: Downtown Today & Concept Refinement September 11, 2017
Committee Meeting: Downtown Today & Concept Refinement September 11, 2017 AGENDA 1. Brief Input Update 2. Comprehensive Plan Principles 3. Downtown Today 4. Concept Updates 5. Future Schedule What is a
More informationPlanning Board Briefing
Planning Board Briefing Why Now? The Sector Plan Implementation Chapter States: Before Stage 1 begins, the following must occur: Approval of the Sectional Map Amendment. Approval of the Greater Lyttonsville
More informationInformation Session July 25, 2018
Concord Pike (US 202) Master Plan Information Session July 25, 2018 1 Concord Pike (US 202) Master Plan 2018 Project Partners Wilmington Area Planning Council Delaware Department of Transportation New
More informationALTERNATIVE STATION AREA -
ALTERNATIVE STATION AREA - THE 10 TH STREET GARDEN STATION Two alternative land use scenarios and designs are illustrated here: Scheme A - Transit-Oriented Development High to Mid-Density Residential /Office
More informationComprehensive Plan & Station Area Zoning
Village of Tarrytown Comprehensive Plan & Station Area Zoning Public Workshop November 5, 2017 Warner Library WXY architecture + urban design Pace University - Land Use Law Center George M. Janes & Associates
More informationDefining and Measuring the Sustainable Transportation Network
Defining and Measuring the Sustainable Transportation Network Andrew Gast-Bray Norm Marshall Kevin Tilbury Scott McCarey Fred Dock Norman Garrick Ellen Greenberg What is a Network? A structure that serves
More informationPublic Meeting May 20, 2014
Public Meeting May 20, 2014 Overview Study Purpose Study Area Overview Strategies Potential Opportunities Implementation and Discussion Skeo Solutions Raleigh Walkable Watershed Pilot 2 Purpose Develop
More informationCommunity Engagement Committee Meeting #1 December 10, :30pm-8:30pm
Community Engagement Committee Meeting #1 December 10, 2014 6:30pm-8:30pm Welcome and Introductions Dana Murdoch Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Project Manager Ryan French Walker Art Center Director
More informationMidtown Greenway to lake street
Making the connection: Midtown Greenway to lake street May 2016 Design experiment: site amenities, wayfinding, and activities at Cepro, near the Midtown Global Market Recent Greenway Development Highlights
More informationThe Project Team advertised the eleventh Open Planning Studio in the following ways:
REPORT OF MEETING Date, Time, Location: Tuesday, November 15, 2016, 12-8 PM at Parkville Senior Center, 11 New Park Avenue, Hartford AND Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 4 8 PM at Asylum Hill Congregational
More informationHenderson County Project Prioritization Discussion
French Broad River MPO Henderson County Project Prioritization Discussion A discussion on projects considered for MPO Local Input Points in the tier for P 5.0 French Broad River MPO 8-8-2018 INTRODUCTION
More informationA larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.
MAP Committee Input McLoughlin Area Draft Vision Map A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF. 1. The map above is intended to portray a vision for the McLoughlin area. It highlights
More informationGrand Rounds History
Grand Rounds History 1883 Plan for Minneapolis Park System prepared by Landscape Architect Horace W. S. Cleveland. The system of connecting parks and parkways was first called the Grand Rounds by William
More informationUNIVERSITY CITY AREA PLAN. Volume Two: Implementation Plan
UNIVERSITY CITY AREA PLAN Volume Two: Implementation Plan Transforming the University City MSD into the vibrant, people-oriented place envisioned in the University City Plan will occur incrementally through
More informationVIRGINIA / LAKE HIGHLAND TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY
VIRGINIA / LAKE HIGHLAND TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE STUDY COMMUNITY MEETING #2 - PRESENTATION OVERVIEW 1 INTRODUCTION 2 CONTEXT STUDIES 3 VISION FRAMEWORK 4 DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS 2 1 INTRODUCTION Project
More informationPotential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop
Potential Green Infrastructure Strategies May 6, 2015 Workshop Background The City of Cortland is developing the Tioughnioga Urban Headwaters Green Infrastructure Action Plan with funding from the National
More informationComanche Creek Greenway IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Comanche Creek Greenway IMPROVEMENT PROJECT City of Chico 2012 INTRODUCTION The City of Chico owns approximately 20 acres along Comanche Creek between Midway and the Union Pacific Railroad line, referred
More informationCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Review Process Los Angeles Union Station Forecourt and Esplanade Improvements constitute a Project Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
More informationWHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE?
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE OPEN HOUSE? OPEN HOUSE PURPOSE The purpose of the open house is to provide an update on the study process and introduce the preliminary concept alternatives. The open house provides
More informationGlenborough at Easton Land Use Master Plan
Vision Statement Sunrise Blvd. Hazel Ave. Prairie City Rd. Gencorp Property Lincoln Regional Airport 1.0 VISION STATEMENT The identifies City of the principles, goals, policies, and standards Lincoln that
More informationIMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES. In This Chapter. Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 CHAPTER 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
In This Chapter Goals & Strategies 182 Project List 183 Future Land Use 186 11 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES NORTH AUGUSTA, SC 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 179 Individual commitment to a group effort that is what
More informationITEM #8. Regional Smart Growth Program. Regional Smart Growth Program. Presentation Overview. Coast Highway Vision and Stategic Plan.
Regional Smart Growth Program Economic Development Commission What is Smart Growth? Adopted as part of the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) RCP provides vision for region based on Smart Growth and sustainability
More information4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY This section evaluates the potential impacts to aesthetics and visual quality. Aesthetics refers to visual resources and the quality of what can
More informationYadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run
Fact Sheet Village of Clemmons, Town of Lewisville, Town of Bermuda Run Project Background The Yadkin River Greenway Feasibility Study is a joint project with the Village of Clemmons, the Town of Bermuda
More informationCommunity Feedback and Recommendations. FAQ Section. 2. Will there be enough open space for the amount of new people proposed to live in the area?
Community Feedback and Recommendations How long do we have to respond to the documents? Response: Comments must be received by October 1st Open Space FAQ Section 1. Where will the open space and/or parks
More informationPLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE
PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE Fall Meeting/Luncheon Welcome! October 16, 2009 PLANNING COORDINATING COMMITTEE Fall Meeting/Luncheon WELCOME! WELCOME! October 16, 2009 October 16, 2009 Agenda I. Lunch/Socialize
More informationMeridian. Pathways Master Plan 1. INTRODUCTION. Plan Overview
Meridian Pathways Master Plan 1. INTRODUCTION Plan Overview Pathways offer numerous aesthetic and recreational opportunities, as well as commuter options for traveling to and from destinations in the city
More informationThe Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation. Route 173, including the Millburn Bypass
The Illinois Department of Transportation and Lake County Division of Transportation welcome you to this Public Hearing for U.S. Route 45 from Illinois Route 132 to Illinois Route 173, including the Millburn
More informationPopulation and Demographics Alternatives Development Design Criteria Stormwater Management Guidelines Alternative 1: No Build
Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 1 Purpose and Need... 1 Alternatives Development... 2 Impacts and Costs... 2 Next Steps... 3 Findings Report... 5 Purpose and Need... 5 Introduction...
More informationThe following principles guide the development of goals and strategies to protect and promote these amenities:
OPEN SPACE/PARKS/TRAILS/RECREATION GOALS/STRATEGIES Cherry Hills Village is a living environment that offers low density development, open areas, public scenic vistas, public trails and public parks. This
More information