APPENDIX 2.1 ANNUAL TESTING REPORTS

Transcription

1 APPENDI 2.1 ANNUAL TESTING REPORTS The following buildings are listed in this report. Please only give bids on the buildings listed in Appendix 3.8 Cost Breakdown. If a building is not listed here, PSU does not have an annual report for it.

2 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information ART BUILDING 1990 S.W. 5th AVE PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

3 GENERAL 10/12/12 LI4120 ART BUILDING A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked Aug Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Aug-09 Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI SYSTEM MAIN 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED WET SYSTEM 1 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED DRY SYSTEM 1 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED PAINT BOOTH 1 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED YES NA NO s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After WET RISER DRY SYSTEM Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1990 S.W. 5th AVE YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

4 10/12/12 LI4120 ART BUILDING WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 4''SHOTGUN RISER W/FLOWSWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model 4''TYCO DPV-1 Date last trip tested Sep-11 Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

5 10/12/12 LI4120 ART BUILDING 1990 S.W. 5th AVE THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 1990 S.W. 5th AVE Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

6 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /22/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 12, 2012 PORTLAND, OR ART BUILDING DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1990 S.W. 5th AVE LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

7 10/12/12 LI4120 ART BUILDING Owner YES NA NO A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? B. Owner/Owner Rep. Name. KEN NI C. Signature:. A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? 2482 TYCO DPV-1 Before Test YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 80 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 41 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? Main Drain Test A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 80 B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. 56 C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 60 Partial Trip Test 4 ART BUILDING BASEMENT PARKING STRUCTURE Valve Information YES NA A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. 24 C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. 12 E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 63 Sec. 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 9/1/11 A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. Sec. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? 8/1/09 A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 1990 S.W. 5th AVE NO NO Dry Valve Inspection

8 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information Blackstone Housing 1831 Park Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

9 10/12/12 LI4120 Blackstone Housing GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO s Double Check 2 os&y SUPERVISED 1ST FLOOR 1 os&y SUPERVISED 2ND FLOOR 1 os&y SUPERVISED 3RD FLOOR 1 os&y SUPERVISED 4TH FLOOR 1 os&y SUPERVISED 5TH FLOOR 1 os&y SUPERVISED WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN DRAIN NA 47 Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1831 Park YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

10 10/12/12 LI4120 Blackstone Housing WET SYSTEMS A. No. of Systems 5 Make & Model SHOTGUN WITH FLOW SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? YES NO Sys. 4 Sys.5 DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. ALARMS Location Testing Results A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? YES NO EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. SUPERVISORY SWITCHES ON DOUBLE CHECK DO NOT SEND SIGNALS COULD NOT FLOW MAIN DRAIN- TERMINATES A FEW FEET ABOVE SINK 1831 Park Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

11 10/12/12 LI4120 Blackstone Housing THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: PIPE MAIN DRAIN TO OUTSIDE INSTALL NEW OR REPAIR TAMPER SWITCHES ON DOUBLE CHECK ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1831 Park Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

12 Date: 8/13/13 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI5246 Technician: DARREN AREHART Five Year FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information BLUMEL HALL BUILDING 1705 S.W. 11th AVE PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY P.O. BO 751 PORTLAND, OR RANDY JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

13 GENERAL 8/13/13 LI5246 BLUMEL HALL BUILDING A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEVIN JOHNSON YES NA NO s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO SYSTEM MAIN 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 5 OS&Y SUPERVISED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN RISER 2 N-48 W-50 N-36 W-38 N42-W44 7th Floor 1.25 N34-W30 N15-W11 N34-W30 3rd Floor 1.25 N-39 W-40 N-39 W-15 N40-W36 8th Floor 1.25 N30-W24 N13-W12 N30-W17 4th Floor 1.25 N-40 W-39 N-27W-15 N40-W39 9th Floor 1.25 N28-W25 N20-W12 N28-W15 5th Floor 1.25 N-43 W-35 N-23 W-14 N35-W35 6th Floor 1.25 N-36 W-31 N-17 W-11 N36-W31 TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? YES NA NO 1705 S.W. 11th AVE Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

14 8/13/13 LI5246 BLUMEL HALL BUILDING WET SYSTEMS YES A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 4''SHOTGUN RISER W/PRESSURE SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? NO DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. WE WEREN T GIVEN ACCESS TO THE STUDENTS PRIVATE LIVING QUARTERS Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

15 8/13/13 LI5246 BLUMEL HALL BUILDING 1705 S.W. 11th AVE THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: SHOULD REPLACE 8TH FLOOR CONTROL VALVE THE VALVE FACE PLATE IS DISCONNECTED FROM VALVE BODY (2.5 MILWAKIE GROOVED MODEL # BB-SCSO) SHOULD REPLACE HEADS THAT HAVE BEEN DAMAGED THERE ARE 9 TOTAL IN THE MAIN HALLWAYS NEAR ROOMS 403, TWO NEAR ROOM 407 ONE NEAR ROOM 503 ONE NEAR ROOM 507 ONE NEAR ROOM 509 ONE NEAR ROOM 609 ONE NEAR ROOM 814 AND ONE NEAR THE 9TH FLOOR ELEVATOR ( 8 HEADS ARE RELIABLE CHROME 165' 1/2 HORIZONTAL SIDE WALLS ONE IS A 155' RELIABLE STANDARD RESPONSE CHROME PENDANT 1/2'') WE DIDN'T RECEIVE ACCESS THE STUDENTS LIVING QUARTERS NO VISUAL INSPECTION. ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: WE DID A INTERNAL PIPE OBSERVATION AND BACK FLUSHED THE FDC CHECK VALVE AS PART OF THE FIVE YEAR TEST AND INSPECTION WE REPLACED PRESSURE GAUGES ON THE 1st FLOOR NORTH SYSTEM THE 3rd FLOOR NORTH AND THE 8th FLOOR WEST. ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1705 S.W. 11th AVE Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

16 8/13/13 LI5246 BLUMEL HALL BUILDING Obstruction investigation A. Describe the condition that requires an obstruction investigation. WE DID AN INTERNAL PIPE OBSERVATION AS PART OF THE FIVE YEAR INSPECTION & TEST B. List the 4 locations examined during obstruction investigation? (i.e., System Valve, Riser, Cross Main, Branch Line) 1 MAIN WATER SUPPLY 2 MAIN RISER 3 8TH FLOOR CROSS MAIN 4 1ST FLOOR BRANCH LINE C. Briefly describe the conditions found at each location. #1 THE MAIN WATER SUPPLY IS IN EELENT CONDITION NO SCALE OR DEBRIS. #2 THE MAIN RISER PIPING IS IN VERRY GOOD CONDITION NO SCALE OR BUILD UP OF ANY KIND #3 THE 8TH FLOOR CROSS-MAIN IS IN GOOD CONDITION THERE IS LITTLE OR NO DEBRIS OR BUILD UP #4 THE FIRST FLOOR BRANCH LINE IS IN VERRY GOOD CONDITION NO DEBRIS OR BUILD UP S.W. 11th AVE Obstruction Investigation

17 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /23/13 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: P.O. BO 751 August 13, 2013 PORTLAND, OR BLUMEL HALL BUILDING DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: RANDY JOHNSON 1705 S.W. 11th AVE LI5246 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

18 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information Broadway Housing 621 SW Jackson Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

19 10/12/12 LI4120 Broadway Housing GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO PUMP CONTROLS 5 BFV/OS&Y SUPERVISED RISER ROOM 4 BFV SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 10 BFV SUPERVISED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After 1ST FLOOR TH ND TH RD TH TH TH TH TH TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? YES NA NO 621 SW Jackson Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

20 10/12/12 LI4120 Broadway Housing WET SYSTEMS A. No. of Systems 10 Make & Model SHOTGUN WITH FLOW SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? YES NO Sys. 4 Sys.5 DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model RELIABLE MODEL D 4" Date last trip tested 9/14/2011 Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. ALARMS Location Testing Results A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? YES NO EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. 621 SW Jackson Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

21 10/12/12 LI4120 Broadway Housing THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 621 SW Jackson Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

22 10/12/12 LI4120 Broadway Housing Owner A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? YES NA NO Valve Information A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? STANDPIPE Before Test RELIABLE 2004 D 4 PUMP ROOM YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 173 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 47 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. NA G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? Main Drain Test A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 173 B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. 150 C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 157 Partial Trip Test YES NA A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. NA C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. NA D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. 27 E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. DT Sec. 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 8/13/11 A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. Sec. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 621 SW Jackson NO NO Dry Valve Inspection

23 10/12/12 A. Did the pump start by reducing pressure in the pump controller pressure sensing line? B. Was pump shaft checked for proper rotation? YES NA NO appear to be in accordance with sprinkler system components (typically 175psi) pressure rating at time of inspection? D. Does the reservoir appear to have a adequate level of water to perform the test? E. Does there appear to be adequate heat in the pump room to maintain a minimum temperature of 40*F at all times? A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Fire pump started 140 B. Record the stop pressure (psi) (switch settings inside of the controller) 160 comments: MAIN PUMP Broadway Housing Before Test C. Does the pressure downstream of pump pressure relief valve if applicable During the test A. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass control valves if provided fully open? B. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass valves (if provided) equipped with either (Tamper, Supervision or Valve seal)? C. With pump running is there a slight discharge of water from both pump packing glands? (1 drip per second) D. Under churn (no flow conditions) test condition does circulation relief valve appear operate and discharge enough water? E. Is the pump free from any unusual noise or vibration when running? F. Does the pump casing appear to maintain an acceptable temperature during the test? Controller A. Is controller pilot light (power on) illuminated? B. Where any power drop situations participated and coordinated with the owner/occupant? (If no transfer switch is not to be tested) C. If applicable did all fire pump enunciation conditions and supervisory sensors to operate when tested? Records (Jockey Pump) A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump started 155 B. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump stopped 166 Records (Fire Pump) Pump Churn A. Were churn (no flow conditions) test conditions maintained for 10 minutes? B. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Suction side pressure gauge. A. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Discharge side pressure gauge. LI SW Jackson Electric Pump, Inspection

24 10/12/12 A. Did the pump start by reducing pressure in the pump controller pressure sensing line? B. Was pump shaft checked for proper rotation? C. Does the pressure downstream of pump pressure relief valve if applicable appear to be in accordance with sprinkler system components (typically 175psi) pressure rating at time of inspection? D. Does the reservoir appear to have a adequate level of water to perform the test? E. Does there appear to be adequate heat in the pump room to maintain a minimum temperature of 40*F at all times? Controller A. Is controller pilot light (power on) illuminated? B. Where any power drop situations participated and coordinated with the owner/occupant? (If no transfer switch is not to be tested) C. If applicable did all fire pump enunciation conditions and supervisory sensors to operate when tested? Records (Jockey Pump) A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump started Broadway Housing Before Test During the test A. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass control valves if provided fully open? B. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass valves (if provided) equipped with either (Tamper, Supervision or Valve seal)? C. With pump running is there a slight discharge of water from both pump packing glands? (1 drip per second) D. Under churn (no flow conditions) test condition does circulation relief valve appear operate and discharge enough water? E. Is the pump free from any unusual noise or vibration when running? F. Does the pump casing appear to maintain an acceptable temperature during the test? B. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump stopped 166 Records (Fire Pump) A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Fire pump started 120 B. Record the stop pressure (psi) (switch settings inside of the controller) 175 Pump Churn A. Were churn (no flow conditions) test conditions maintained for 10 minutes? B. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Suction side pressure gauge. NA A. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Discharge side pressure gauge. 165 comments: back up pump YES NA NO LI SW Jackson Electric Pump, Inspection

25 10/12/2012 LI4120 PUMP Manufacturer: ITT Serial No.: QK6786 Location Of Pump: PUMP ROOM Shaft - Horizontal: FM Approved: YES Model/: WT Impellor Size: 7.19 Vertical: Rated GPM: % GPM: 375 RPM: 1770 Suction From: TANK Tank Size: 1515 Rated (psi): % Rated (psi): 99.3 MA rated (psi): Suction Size: 4 Discharge Size: 4 Tank Height: 5 Last year pump results Churn : % : % : 90 Flow Gpm at Churn: 0 100%: %: 375 IF VERTICAL TYPE Vertical Distance (ft.): 5 Manufacturer: ITT Performance - Smooth: Discharge Gauge Pumping (ft.): 5 Shop/Serial No.: QK6786 Rough: to Water Level (ft.): FM Approved: YES Model/: WT DRIVER Manufacturer: METRON Serial No.: HQ2552BLFC Rated H.P.: 25 Phase: 3 FM Approved: NO Model/: AU Rated RPM: 1765 Cycles: 60 Electric/Diesel: ELEC Rated Voltage: 230/460 Operating Voltage: 460 Service Factor: 1.15 Other: Rated Full Load Amps: 64/32 150%: 73/36 Hours on engine: DIESEL ENGINE STARTS Battery #1 Battery #2 water level of batteries Frame No. CONTROLLER Manufacturer: METRON Serial No.: SE03N Starting (psi): 120 Stop (psi): 175 FM Approved: YES Model/: M300DMS25480C Manual: Manual: Horse Power.: 25 Auto: Auto: Jockey Pump Manufacturer BALDOR Start (psi): 155 Drop: Stop (psi): 166 Water Flow: Transfer Switch 1.75 insert hose monster Coeff.=.975 Play pipe (Ul Listed) Coeff.=.97 Broadway Housing 621 SW Jackson 2.5" hose monster Coeff.=.906 Manufacturer: METRON Model: MTS100A Number of Size of Corrected to rated Aver Targeted Velocity Aver of Hose Coeff. Hose Pitot Readings Flow Suction Discharge Net PSI RPM speed of flow head corr. Amps Streams Streams Volts Net PSI Flow Churn % / % / Actual Voltage across the Churn AB 480 AC 484 BC 480 Actual Churn A 21 B 21 C 21 Actual Voltage across the 100% AB 480 AC 484 BC 480 Actual 100% A 29 B 30 C 29 Actual Voltage across the 150% AB 480 AC 484 BC 480 Actual 150% A 32 B 32 C 32 Recommendations S/N: SE03N Notes/Comments: THIS IS THE BACKUP PUMP Page 1Pump Test (2)

26 Flow Test Last Years Test Minimum acceptable 100% GPM Page 2Pump Test (2)

27 10/12/2012 LI4120 PUMP Manufacturer: ITT Serial No.: /QK678 Location Of Pump: PUMP ROOM Shaft - Horizontal: FM Approved: YES Model/: 1580 Impellor Size: 7.89 Vertical: Rated GPM: % GPM: 750 RPM: 3550 Suction From: Tank Size: Rated (psi): % Rated (psi): 69 MA rated (psi): 104 Suction Size: 5 Discharge Size: 4 Tank Height: Last year pump results Churn : % : % : 145 Flow Gpm at Churn: 0 100%: %: 750 IF VERTICAL TYPE Vertical Distance (ft.): Manufacturer: Performance - Smooth: Discharge Gauge Pumping (ft.): Shop/Serial No.: Rough: to Water Level (ft.): FM Approved: Model/: DRIVER Manufacturer: US ELECTRIC Serial No.: NA Rated H.P.: 40 Phase: 3 FM Approved: NO Model/: AD27 Rated RPM: 3525 Cycles: 60 Electric/Diesel: ELEC Rated Voltage: 230/460 Operating Voltage: 460 Service Factor: 1.15 Other: Rated Full Load Amps: 95/47 150%: 86/43 Hours on engine: NA DIESEL ENGINE STARTS Battery #1 Battery #2 water level of batteries Frame No. CONTROLLER Manufacturer: METRON Serial No.: 5E03N Starting (psi): 140 Stop (psi): 160 FM Approved: YES Model/: M300DMS C Manual: Manual: Horse Power.: 40 Auto: Auto: Jockey Pump Manufacturer Start (psi): 155 Drop: Stop (psi): 165 Water Flow: Transfer Switch 1.75 insert hose monster Coeff.=.975 Manufacturer: Play pipe (Ul Listed) Coeff.=.97 Model: Broadway Housing 621 SW Jackson 2.5" hose monster Coeff.=.906 Number of Size of Corrected to rated Aver Targeted Velocity Aver of Hose Coeff. Hose Pitot Readings Flow Suction Discharge Net PSI RPM speed of flow head corr. Amps Streams Streams Volts Net PSI Flow Churn % / % /4 NA NA Actual Voltage across the Churn AB 480 AC 476 BC 480 Actual Churn A 27 B 23 C 27 Actual Voltage across the 100% AB 480 AC 472 BC 480 Actual 100% A 42 B 40 C 44 Actual Voltage across the 150% AB AC BC Actual 150% A B C Recommendations FLOWMETER IS ONLY 500GPM- CANNOT RECORD 150% FLOW (750 GPM) NEEDS TO BE REPLACED WITH CORRECT GPM FLOWMETER S/N: Notes/Comments: THIS IS THE PRIMARY PUMP Page 1Pump Test

28 Flow Test Last Years Test Minimum acceptable 100% GPM Page 2Pump Test

29 Date: 10/19/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information CORBETT BUILDING 2828 S.W. CORBETT ST. PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

30 GENERAL 10/19/12 LI4120 CORBETT BUILDING A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked Aug Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Aug-09 Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI YES NA NO s SYSTEM MAIN 1 OS&Y SUPERVISED WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN RISER Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 2828 S.W. CORBETT ST. YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

31 10/19/12 LI4120 CORBETT BUILDING WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model SHOTGUN RISER W/FLOWSWITCH SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. SYSTEM PRESSURE LOW DURING FULL FLOW TEST SYSTEM AT 15 PSI RESIDUAL Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

32 10/19/12 LI4120 CORBETT BUILDING 2828 S.W. CORBETT ST. THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 2828 S.W. CORBETT ST. Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

33 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /22/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 19, 2012 PORTLAND, OR CORBETT BUILDING DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 2828 S.W. CORBETT ST. LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

34 Date: 10/9/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information CRAMER HALL 1721 SW Broadway PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR CARY MORRIS Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

35 GENERAL 10/9/12 LI4120 CRAMER HALL A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO PUMP CONTROLS 6 OS&Y/BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 6 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED JOCKEY PUMP CONT 2 GATE SUPERVISED YES NA NO s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After BASEMENT st FLOOR rd FLOOR th FLOOR Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1721 SW Broadway YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

36 10/9/12 LI4120 CRAMER HALL WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 4''SHOTGUN RISER W/PRESSURE SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. THE 2nd & 4th FLOORS AS OF NOT YET SPRINKLERED TO BE DONE AT A LATER DATE Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

37 10/9/12 LI4120 CRAMER HALL 1721 SW Broadway THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 1721 SW Broadway Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

38 10/9/12 A. Did the pump start by reducing pressure in the pump controller pressure sensing line? B. Was pump shaft checked for proper rotation? YES NA NO appear to be in accordance with sprinkler system components (typically 175psi) pressure rating at time of inspection? D. Does the reservoir appear to have a adequate level of water to perform the test? E. Does there appear to be adequate heat in the pump room to maintain a minimum temperature of 40*F at all times? Records (Jockey Pump) A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump started 100 B. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump stopped 120 A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Fire pump started 90 B. Record the stop pressure (psi) (switch settings inside of the controller) 130 comments: CRAMER HALL Before Test C. Does the pressure downstream of pump pressure relief valve if applicable During the test A. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass control valves if provided fully open? B. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass valves (if provided) equipped with either (Tamper, Supervision or Valve seal)? C. With pump running is there a slight discharge of water from both pump packing glands? (1 drip per second) D. Under churn (no flow conditions) test condition does circulation relief valve appear operate and discharge enough water? E. Is the pump free from any unusual noise or vibration when running? F. Does the pump casing appear to maintain an acceptable temperature during the test? Controller A. Is controller pilot light (power on) illuminated? B. Where any power drop situations participated and coordinated with the owner/occupant? (If no transfer switch is not to be tested) C. If applicable did all fire pump enunciation conditions and supervisory sensors to operate when tested? Records (Fire Pump) Pump Churn A. Were churn (no flow conditions) test conditions maintained for 10 minutes? B. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Suction side pressure gauge. A. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Discharge side pressure gauge. LI SW Broadway Electric Pump, Inspection

39 10/9/2012 LI4120 CRAMER HALL Owner YES NA NO A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? Owner/Owner Rep. Name. KEVIN JOHNSON Signature: Valve Information Valve Serial Numbers Manufactures Name Manufacturers Date (year) Valve Model Valve Size Location? FLOODAY 1999 B 2.OO SUB-BASEMENT Area protected by Preaction system? SERVER ROOM SUB-BASEMENT Before Test YES NA NO A. Is system control valve in OPEN position? B. Does the air compressor if applicable appear to be free of physical damage at the time of inspection? C. Do all gauges on the Preaction valve appear to be operable? D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 135 E. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 30 F. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the pressure gauge of the Pneumatic Actuator if applicable. 135 G. Are all trim valves on the trim in their proper positions at the time of inspection? H. Does the valve room appear to have adequate heat to maintain a minimum of 40*F? I. Does the system control valve have any of the following - a tamper, sealed, locked or supervised? Main Drain Test A. Record supply pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 135 B. Record supply pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. 95 C. Record supply pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 115 Testing A. Was a trip test of the Preaction valve conducted with control valve fully opened? B. Was the system activated using the manual actuation devices? C. Was the detection system operated? D. If detection was used to trip the valve what type was used? LOW AIR Partial Trip Test YES NA NO A. Was partial trip test of the Preaction valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. If applicable C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of Preaction valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve Sec. 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 9/1/11 A. Was a full flow trip test of Preaction valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. If applicable C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of Preaction valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. F. Record time in seconds between the start of test and water flow from inspectors test connection G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. Sec. Sec. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? A. Was internal inspection of Preaction valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? If applicable B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 1721 SW Broadway Preaction System, Inspection

40 10/9/2012 LI4120 CRAMER HALL 1721 SW Broadway PUMP Manufacturer: PEERLESS Serial No.: Location Of Pump: BASEMENT Shaft - Horizontal: FM Approved: YES Model/: 3PVF8 Impellor Size: 6.17 Vertical: Rated GPM: % GPM: 375 RPM: 3500 Suction From: CITY Tank Size: Rated (psi): % Rated (psi): 39 MA rated (psi): 58 Suction Size: 6 Discharge Size: 6 Tank Height: Last year pump results Churn : 100% : 150% : Flow Gpm at Churn: 100%: 150%: IF VERTICAL TYPE Vertical Distance (ft.): 1 Manufacturer: PEERLESS Performance - Smooth: Discharge Gauge Pumping (ft.): 1 Shop/Serial No.: Rough: to Water Level (ft.): FM Approved: YES Model/: 3PVF8 DRIVER Manufacturer: EMERSON Serial No.: FF15S1V Rated H.P.: 15 Phase: 3 FM Approved: YES Model/: AD14A Rated RPM: 3500 Cycles: Electric/Diesel: ELECTRIC Rated Voltage: 200 Operating Voltage: 400 Service Factor: 1.15 Other: Rated Full Load Amps: %: 20.5 Hours on engine: DIESEL ENGINE STARTS Battery #1 Battery #2 water level of batteries Frame No. CONTROLLER Manufacturer: US ELECTRIC Serial No.: RE Starting (psi): 90 Stop (psi): 130 FM Approved: YES Model/: FTA750-AD15HH Manual: Manual: Horse Power.: 15 Auto: Auto: Jockey Pump Manufacturer GRUNFOS Start (psi): 90 Drop: Stop (psi): 130 Water Flow: 1.75 insert hose monster Coeff.=.975 Play pipe (Ul Listed) Coeff.= " hose monster Coeff.=.906 Transfer Switch Manufacturer: US ELECTRIC Model: S/N: Targeted flow Number of Hose Streams Coeff. Size of Hose Streams Velocity Pitot Readings Flow Suction Discharge Net PSI head corr. Churn % / % / Corrected to rated speed Actual Voltage across the Churn AB AC BC Actual Churn A B C Actual Voltage across the 100% AB AC BC Actual 100% A B C Actual Voltage across the 150% AB AC BC Actual 150% A B C Recommendations RPM Net PSI Flow Aver of Volts Aver of Amps Notes/Comments: Page 1Pump Test

41 Flow Test Last Years Test Minimum acceptable 100% 0 GPM Page 2Pump Test

42 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /22/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 9, 2012 PORTLAND, OR CRAMER HALL DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: CARY MORRIS 1721 SW Broadway LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

43 Date: 10/19/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information ENGINEERING BUILDING 1930 S.W. 4th AVE. PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

44 GENERAL 10/19/12 LI4120 ENGINEERING BUILDING A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI PUMP CONTROLS 3 OS&Y/BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 3 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED JOCKY PUMP CONT. 2 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED YES NA NO s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond 87 Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After ATRIUM RISER th Floor ST FLOOR RISER th Floor EAST & WEST PENTHOUSE nd Floor rd Floor TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? YES NA NO 1930 S.W. 4th AVE. Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

45 10/19/12 LI4120 ENGINEERING BUILDING WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model SHOTGUN RISER W/ PUMP B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

46 10/19/12 LI4120 ENGINEERING BUILDING 1930 S.W. 4th AVE. THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 1930 S.W. 4th AVE. Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

47 10/19/12 A. Did the pump start by reducing pressure in the pump controller pressure sensing line? B. Was pump shaft checked for proper rotation? YES NA NO appear to be in accordance with sprinkler system components (typically 175psi) pressure rating at time of inspection? D. Does the reservoir appear to have a adequate level of water to perform the test? E. Does there appear to be adequate heat in the pump room to maintain a minimum temperature of 40*F at all times? A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Fire pump started 140 B. Record the stop pressure (psi) (switch settings inside of the controller) 160 comments: ENGINEERING BUILDING Before Test C. Does the pressure downstream of pump pressure relief valve if applicable During the test A. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass control valves if provided fully open? B. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass valves (if provided) equipped with either (Tamper, Supervision or Valve seal)? C. With pump running is there a slight discharge of water from both pump packing glands? (1 drip per second) D. Under churn (no flow conditions) test condition does circulation relief valve appear operate and discharge enough water? E. Is the pump free from any unusual noise or vibration when running? F. Does the pump casing appear to maintain an acceptable temperature during the test? Controller A. Is controller pilot light (power on) illuminated? B. Where any power drop situations participated and coordinated with the owner/occupant? (If no transfer switch is not to be tested) C. If applicable did all fire pump enunciation conditions and supervisory sensors to operate when tested? Records (Jockey Pump) A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump started 145 B. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump stopped 158 Records (Fire Pump) Pump Churn A. Were churn (no flow conditions) test conditions maintained for 10 minutes? B. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Suction side pressure gauge. A. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Discharge side pressure gauge. LI S.W. 4th AVE. Electric Pump, Inspection

48 PUMP Manufacturer: A-C FIRE PUMPS Serial No.: /QK917 Location Of Pump: 1ST FLOOR PUMP ROOM Shaft - Horizontal: FM Approved: yes Model/: 7L Impellor Size: 7.16 Vertical: x Rated GPM: % GPM: 750 RPM: 3550 Suction From: city Tank Size: Rated (psi): % Rated (psi): 54 MA rated (psi): 90 Suction Size: 4 Discharge Size: 4 Tank Height: Last year pump results Churn : 100% : 150% : Flow Gpm at Churn: 100%: 150%: IF VERTICAL TYPE Vertical Distance (ft.): 1 Manufacturer: A-C FIRE PUMPS Performance - Smooth: Discharge Gauge Pumping (ft.): Shop/Serial No.: /QK9170 Rough: to Water Level (ft.): FM Approved: yes Model/: 7L DRIVER Manufacturer: us electric Serial No.: FF30S1EV Rated H.P.: 30 Phase: FM Approved: yes Model/: AFD24 Rated RPM: 3550 Cycles: Electric/Diesel: electric Rated Voltage: 230/460 Operating Voltage: 190/380 Service Factor: Other: Rated Full Load Amps: %: 34 Hours on engine: DIESEL ENGINE STARTS Battery #1 Battery #2 water level of batteries Frame No. CONTROLLER Manufacturer: METRON Serial No.: LL-05N Starting (psi): 75 Stop (psi): FM Approved: YES Model/: M30AM B Manual: Manual: Horse Power.: 30 Auto: x Auto: Jockey Pump Manufacturer metron Start (psi): 145 Drop: x Stop (psi): 158 Water Flow: x Targeted flow 10/19/2012 Transfer Switch 1.75 insert hose monster Coeff.=.975 Manufacturer: Number of Hose Streams Coeff. Size of Hose Streams METRON Play pipe (Ul Listed) Coeff.=.97 Model: ENGINEERING BUILDING 1930 S.W. 4th AVE. 2.5" hose monster Coeff.=.906 MTS-100A Velocity Pitot Readings Flow Suction Discharge Net PSI head corr. Churn % / % / Actual Voltage across the Churn AB AC BC Actual Churn A B C Actual Voltage across the 100% AB AC BC Actual 100% A B C Actual Voltage across the 150% AB AC BC Actual 150% A B C Recommendations S/N: RPM LL-05N Corrected to rated speed Net PSI LI4120 Flow Aver of Volts Aver of Amps Notes/Comments: Page 1Pump Test

49 Flow Test 10 0 Last Years Test Minimum acceptable 100% GPM Page 2Pump Test

50 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /29/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 19, 2012 PORTLAND, OR ENGINEERING BUILDING DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1930 S.W. 4th AVE. LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

51 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information Extended Studies 1025 SW Mill St Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

52 10/12/12 LI4120 Extended Studies GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves s Supervision Operational Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Sealed,Supervised or Locked Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes NO MAIN CONTROL 1 OS&Y NO WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN DRAIN 2 75 NA 70 Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1025 SW Mill St YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

53 10/12/12 LI4120 Extended Studies WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model CENTRAL MODEL A 4"ALARM CHECK B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. ALARMS Location Testing Results A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? YES NO EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. Water motor gong shut off os&y not tampered practice rooms in basement not protected could not perform main drain test 1025 SW Mill St Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

54 10/12/12 LI4120 Extended Studies THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: add locks or tamper switches to os&y add sprinkler coverage to practice rooms repair/replace water motor gong pipe main drain to outside ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1025 SW Mill St Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

55 GENERAL 10/12/12 LI4120 PSU SB A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI YES NA NO s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO SYSTEM MAIN 1 OS&Y LOCKED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN RISER Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

56 10/12/12 LI4120 PSU SB WET SYSTEMS YES A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 4''SHOTGUN RISER W/PRESSURE SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? NO DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. MAIN DRAIN CAN'T BE FULLY FLOWED DRAIN BACKS UP Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

57 10/12/12 LI4120 PSU SB THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: MAIN DRAIN NEEDS TO BE PIPED SO A FULL FLOW TEST CAN BE PREFORMED. ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

58 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information HELLEN GORDON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 1609 SW 12th PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

59 GENERAL 10/12/12 LI4120 HELLEN GORDON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked Aug Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Aug-09 Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI YES NA NO s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO SYSTEM MAIN 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED WET SYSTEM 1 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED DRY SYSTEM 1 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After WET RISER DRY SYSTEM Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1609 SW 12th YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

60 10/12/12 LI4120 HELLEN GORDON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 4''SHOTGUN RISER W/FLOWSWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model RELIABLE MODEL A 2.5'' Date last trip tested Sep-11 Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

61 10/12/12 LI4120 HELLEN GORDON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER 1609 SW 12th THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1609 SW 12th Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

62 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /29/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 HELLEN GORDON CHILD October 12, 2012 PORTLAND, OR DEVELOPMENT CENTER DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1609 SW 12th LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

63 10/12/12 LI4120 HELLEN GORDON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Owner YES NA NO A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? B. Owner/Owner Rep. Name. KEN NI C. Signature:. A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? n/a RELIABLE MODEL A 2.5 BASEMENT Before Test OUTSIDE CANOPY Valve Information YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 60 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 31 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? Main Drain Test A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 60 B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. 45 C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 55 Partial Trip Test YES NA A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. 20 C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. 12 E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 17 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 9/1/11 A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? 8/1/09 A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 1609 SW 12th Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? NO NO Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Dry Valve Inspection

64 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information King Albert 1809 SW 11th Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

65 10/12/12 LI4120 King Albert GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO MAIN CONTROL 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 4 OS&Y SUPERVISED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN DRAIN Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1809 SW 11th YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

66 10/12/12 LI4120 King Albert WET SYSTEMS A. No. of Systems 5 Make & Model B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? YES NO Sys. 4 Sys.5 DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. ALARMS Location Testing Results A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? YES NO EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR SW 11th Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

67 10/12/12 LI4120 King Albert THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: NEED TO CHANGE SSP THAT IS PAINTED IN FRONT OF UNIT 105 IN HALLWAY ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1809 SW 11th Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

68 Date: 10/22/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Annual Inspection Job Site Information Koinonia House 633 SW Montgomery Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

69 10/22/12 LI4120 Koinonia House GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves s Supervision Operational Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Sealed,Supervised or Locked Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes NO MAIN CONTROL 1 OS&Y NO WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After BASEMENT Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 633 SW Montgomery YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

70 10/22/12 LI4120 Koinonia House WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model SHOTGUN WITH FLOW SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. ALARMS Location Testing Results A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? YES NO EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. 1 PAINTED 165 SSU IN MAIN RESTAURANT AREA 633 SW Montgomery Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

71 10/22/12 LI4120 Koinonia House THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: REPLACE PAINTED SSU ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 633 SW Montgomery Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

72 Date: 10/19/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information LINCOLN HALL 1620 SW Park PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

73 GENERAL 10/19/12 LI4120 LINCOLN HALL A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO SYSTEM MAIN 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 8 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED YES NA NO s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow MAIN RISER BASEMENT ST FLOOR ND FLOOR RD FLOOR TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1620 SW Park After Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow YES NA NO After Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

74 10/19/12 LI4120 LINCOLN HALL WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 6''SHOTGUN RISER W/PRESSURE SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

75 10/19/12 LI4120 LINCOLN HALL 1620 SW Park THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 1620 SW Park Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

76 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /22/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 19, 2012 PORTLAND, OR LINCOLN HALL DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1620 SW Park LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

77 Date: 7/19/13 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI5246 Technician: DARREN AREHART Five Year FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information PSU MILLER LIBRARY 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

78 GENERAL 7/19/13 LI5246 PSU MILLER LIBRARY A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked Aug Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Aug-09 Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEVIN JOHNSON WET SYSTEM 3 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED DRY CONTROL 1 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED YES NA NO s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After DRY RISER WET RISER Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

79 7/19/13 LI5246 PSU MILLER LIBRARY WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model SHOTGUN RISER W/FLOWSWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model 4'' RELIABLE MODEL D Date last trip tested Sep-11 Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. THIS WAS A FIVE YEAR INSPECTION INTERNAL PIPE OBSERVATION AND BACKFLUSH OF THE FDC CHECK VALVE Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

80 7/19/13 LI5246 PSU MILLER LIBRARY 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: THE DRY HEADS ON THE OUTSIDE CANOPY AT THE MAIN ENTRANCE SHOULD BE CHANGED OUT THEY ARE STARTING TO CORRODE ( there are ' chrome semi reccessed model G pendants) THERE ARE 45 GLASS BULB HEADS DATED 1967 THESE HEADS SHOULD BE REPLACED TO MATCH THE REST OF THE HEADS ON THE ENTIRE FLOOR 1/2 165' CHROME PENDANTS MODEL G THESE HEAD ARE ON THE BASEMENT LEVEL ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: DID A FIVE YEAR INSPECTION AND TEST WE DID A INTERNAL OBSERVATION BACK FLUSHED THE FDC CHECK VALVE CHANGED OUT THE DRY SYSTEM AIR AND WATER PRESSURE GAUGES WITH NEW GAUGES. ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

81 7/19/13 LI5246 PSU MILLER LIBRARY Obstruction investigation A. Describe the condition that requires an obstruction investigation. WE ARE DOING A FIVE YEAR INSPECTION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM B. List the 4 locations examined during obstruction investigation? (i.e., System Valve, Riser, Cross Main, Branch Line) 1 MAIN RISER 2 BASEMENT BRANCH LINE 3 BASEMENT CROSS-MAIN 4 DRY SYSTEM MAIN-DRY VALVE C. Briefly describe the conditions found at each location. #1 MAIN RISER HAS A LITTLE BIT OF RUST PIPE LOOKS GOOD #2 BASMENT BRANCH LINE PIPE WAS FREE OF ANY DEBRIS OR BUILD UP #3 BASEMENT CROSS-MAIN PIPE IS IN GOOD CONDITION NO DEBRIS OR SCALE #4 THE DRY SYSTEM MAIN AND DRY VALVE ARE IN GOOD CONDITION NO DEBRIS 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. Obstruction Investigation

82 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /6/13 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 July 19, 2013 PORTLAND, OR PSU MILLER LIBRARY DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. LI5246 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

83 7/19/13 LI5246 PSU MILLER LIBRARY Owner YES NA NO A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? B. Owner/Owner Rep. Name. KEVIN JOHNSON C. Signature:. A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? 17007B 2003 D Before Test RELIABLE OUT SIDE CANOPY YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 51 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 36 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? Main Drain Test A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 51 B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. 31 C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 40 Partial Trip Test 4 RISER ROOM FIRST FLOOR Valve Information YES NA A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 43 Sec. 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 9/19/11 A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. Sec. Sec. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? 7/19/13 A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 1620 S.W. PARK AVE. NO NO Dry Valve Inspection

84 Date: 10/11/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information MONTGOMERY BUILDING 1802 SW 10TH PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

85 GENERAL 10/11/12 LI4120 MONTGOMERY BUILDING A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEN NI YES NA NO s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO SYSTEM MAIN 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 5 OS&Y SUPERVISED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN RISER Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1802 SW 10TH YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

86 10/11/12 LI4120 MONTGOMERY BUILDING WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model 4''SHOTGUN RISER W/PRESSURE SWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model Date last trip tested Partia N Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. ON MAIN DRAIN FLOW TEST THE WATER WILL RUN BACK IN TO THE BUILDING THROUGH THE PENETRATIONS BELOW THE FOUNDATION NEED TO RUN A HOSE OR PIECE OF PIPE OUT OFF THE DRAIN. Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

87 10/11/12 LI4120 MONTGOMERY BUILDING 1802 SW 10TH THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 1802 SW 10TH Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

88 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /22/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 11, 2012 PORTLAND, OR MONTGOMERY BUILDING DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1802 SW 10TH LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

89 Date: 10/15/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information Ondine Building 1912 SW 6th Ave. Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Kevin Johnson Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

90 10/15/12 LI4120 Ondine Building GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO MAIN CONTROL 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED PUMP CONTROLS 5 BUTTERFLY/OS&Y SUPERVISED JOCKEY CONTROLS 2 BUTTERFLY SUPERVISED FLOOR CONTROLS 15 OS&Y SUPERVISED s WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow MAIN DRAIN 1st FL th floor nd floor th floor rd floor th floor th floor th floor th floor th floor TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? After 1912 SW 6th Ave. Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow YES NA NO After Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

91 10/15/12 LI4120 Ondine Building WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model SHOTGUN RISER W/FLOOR ISOLATION VALVES AND FLOW SWITCHES B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model 4.0 FPV-1 Date last trip tested Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. 11th floor th floor th floor th floor th floor SW 6th Ave. YES NO Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

92 10/15/12 LI4120 Ondine Building THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 1912 SW 6th Ave. Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

93 10/15/12 LI4120 Ondine Building Owner A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? YES NA NO x Valve Information A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? Reliable 2011 dpv-1 6 b2 parking b2 parking Before Test YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? x x C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 75 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 39 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? x F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? x G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? x H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. na G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? x H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? x I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? x Main Drain Test A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 75 B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. na C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 63 Partial Trip Test YES NA A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? x B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. na C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. na D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. 13 E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. dt 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? na A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? na A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? x B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? x C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? x After Test Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? x A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? x B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? x 1912 SW 6th Ave. NO NO Sec. x Sec. Sec. Sec. Dry Valve Inspection

94 10/15/12 A. Did the pump start by reducing pressure in the pump controller pressure sensing line? B. Was pump shaft checked for proper rotation? YES NA NO appear to be in accordance with sprinkler system components (typically 175psi) pressure rating at time of inspection? D. Does the reservoir appear to have a adequate level of water to perform the test? E. Does there appear to be adequate heat in the pump room to maintain a minimum temperature of 40*F at all times? A. Is controller pilot light (power on) illuminated? A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump started B. Record the pressure (psi) when the Jockey pump stopped Controller Records (Jockey Pump) A. Record the pressure (psi) when the Fire pump started 140 B. Record the stop pressure (psi) (switch settings inside of the controller) 170 comments: Ondine Building Before Test C. Does the pressure downstream of pump pressure relief valve if applicable During the test A. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass control valves if provided fully open? B. Are pump suction, discharge and by-pass valves (if provided) equipped with either (Tamper, Supervision or Valve seal)? C. With pump running is there a slight discharge of water from both pump packing glands? (1 drip per second) D. Under churn (no flow conditions) test condition does circulation relief valve appear operate and discharge enough water? E. Is the pump free from any unusual noise or vibration when running? F. Does the pump casing appear to maintain an acceptable temperature during the test? B. Where any power drop situations participated and coordinated with the owner/occupant? (If no transfer switch is not to be tested) C. If applicable did all fire pump enunciation conditions and supervisory sensors to operate when tested? Records (Fire Pump) Pump Churn A. Were churn (no flow conditions) test conditions maintained for 10 minutes? B. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Suction side pressure gauge. A. Record pressure (psi) shown on the Discharge side pressure gauge. LI SW 6th Ave. Electric Pump, Inspection

95 10/15/2012 LI4120 PUMP Manufacturer: Peerless Serial No.: A Location Of Pump: B2 Parking Shaft - Horizontal: FM Approved: no Model/: 5PVF-11 Impellor Size: 8.52 Vertical: Rated GPM: % GPM: 750 RPM: 3565 Suction From: city Tank Size: Rated (psi): % Rated (psi): 68 MA rated (psi): 113 Suction Size: 5 Discharge Size: 5 Tank Height: Last year pump results Churn : NA 100% : NA 150% : NA Flow Gpm at Churn: NA 100%: NA 150%: IF VERTICAL TYPE Vertical Distance (ft.): Manufacturer: Performance - Smooth: Discharge Gauge Pumping (ft.): Shop/Serial No.: Rough: to Water Level (ft.): FM Approved: Model/: DRIVER Manufacturer: Emerson Serial No.: na Rated H.P.: 50 Phase: 3 FM Approved: no Model/: DC36 Rated RPM: 3565 Cycles: 60 Electric/Diesel: Electric Rated Voltage: /460 Operating Voltage: 460 Service Factor: 1.15 Other: Rated Full Load Amps: %: na Hours on engine: NA DIESEL ENGINE STARTS Battery #1 Battery #2 water level of batteries Frame No. CONTROLLER Manufacturer: Firetrol Serial No.: RE Starting (psi): 140 Stop (psi): 174 FM Approved: yes Model/: FTA1930-AM50B Manual: Manual: Horse Power.: 50 Auto: Auto: Jockey Pump Manufacturer Grundfos Start (psi): 145 Drop: Stop (psi): 167 Water Flow: Transfer Switch 1.75 insert hose monster Coeff.=.975 Manufacturer: Firetrol Play pipe (Ul Listed) Coeff.=.97 Model: Ondine Building 1912 SW 6th Ave. 2.5" hose monster Coeff.=.906 FTA950-AM100B Number of Size of Corrected to rated Aver Targeted Velocity Aver of Hose Coeff. Hose Pitot Readings Flow Suction Discharge Net PSI RPM speed of flow head corr. Amps Streams Streams Volts Net PSI Flow Churn % / % / Actual Voltage across the Churn AB 484 AC 485 BC 486 Actual Churn A 29 B 30 C 31 Actual Voltage across the 100% AB 482 AC 483 BC 486 Actual 100% A 50 B 51 C 52 Actual Voltage across the 150% AB 482 AC 484 BC 484 Actual 150% A 54 B 55 C 56 Recommendations S/N: RE Notes/Comments: Page 1Pump Test

96 Flow Test Last Years Test 10 0 Minimum acceptable 100% GPM Page 2Pump Test

97 Date: 10/15/12 Time: 8:00 A.M. Job Number: LI4120 Technician: DARREN AREHART Annual FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECTION & TEST Job Site Information PARKING l 1872 SW Broadway PORTLAND, OR KEN NI Billing Information PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 PORTLAND, OR KEVIN JOHNSON Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

98 GENERAL 10/15/12 LI4120 PARKING l A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? Owner/Rep. Signature 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked Aug Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Aug-09 Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? s Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals where they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) where removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves KEVIN JOHNSON YES NA NO s SYSTEM CONTROLS 2 OS&Y LOCKED WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After DRY RISER Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1872 SW Broadway YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

99 10/15/12 LI4120 PARKING l WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems 1 Make & Model SHOTGUN RISER W/FLOWSWITCH B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model RELIABLE MODEL D Date last trip tested Sep-11 Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. Location Testing Results ALARMS YES NO A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. THIS SYSTEM IS VERRY HARD TO RESET VALVE. Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

100 10/15/12 LI4120 PARKING l 1872 SW Broadway THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: CITY & STATE: ATTN: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 ZIP: 1872 SW Broadway Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

101 INSPECTION REPAIR PROPOSAL PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY /22/12 Proposal Submitted to: Phone: Date: Date of Street Address: Fax Number: Inspection: 121 S.W. MORRISON #200 October 15, 2012 PORTLAND, OR PARKING l DARREN AREHART City, State, Zip Code Site Name: INSPECTOR: To The Attention of: Job Location: Job Number: KEVIN JOHNSON 1872 SW Broadway LI4120 SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDED IN THIS PROPOSAL All previous noted comments or suggested improvements can be repaired at a time and material basis. A fixed cost price could be quoted with ample time allowances. ALL WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY All WORK TO BE DONE DURING OUR NORMAL WORKING HOURS MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY ECLUSIONS: Work beyond repair of the deficiencies noted above. TERMS TIME AND MATERIALS - Western States Fire Protection proposes to complete the work described above for an hourly labor rate of $95.00 per hr for field labor. parts delivery, project design if required, and project management if required. PAYMENT: Payment is to be made in monthly as work progresses to the value of 100 percent of all work completed and all materials uses or stored on site. Payments of the amount billed shall be paid within 30 days from receipt of each invoice. LIMITATION OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY LIABILITY CLIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY IS NOT AN INSURER AND THAT THE PAYMENTS MADE TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY BY CLIENT ON THIS PROJECT ARE BASED UPON THE VALUE OF THE SYSTEM AND/OR SERVICES PROVIDED AND ARE UNRELATED TO THE VALUE OF CLIENT'S PROPERTY OR BUSINESS. IN RECOGNITION OF THE RELATIVE RISKS AND BENEFITS TO THE CLIENT AND TO WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY RESULTING FROM THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED BY WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, THE RISKS HAVE BEEN ALLOCATED SUCH THAT THE CLIENT, AS WELL AS THE CLIENT'S ASSIGNS, AGENTS, AND REPRESENTATIVES, AGREE, TO THE FULLEST ETENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LIMIT THE LIABILITY OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, TO A MAIMUM OF $10,000 OR THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT/PRICE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED, WHICHEVER IS LESS, AND CLIENT DOES HEREBY RELEASE WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY FROM ANY CLAIMS IN ECESS OF SAID LIMIT. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL APPLY TO ALL JUDGMENTS, CLAIMS, LIABILITY, COSTS, CLAIM EPENSES, AND ALL OTHER DAMAGES OR LOSSES OF ANY NATURE SUSTAINED BY CLIENT, CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTORS, OR ANY OTHER PARTY CLAIMING BY OR THROUGH THEM. THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL BE ENFORCEABLE, 1.) REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT OF ANY ACTUAL DAMAGES SUSTAINED, IF ANY, AS A RESULT OF THIS WORK; AND, 2.) EVEN IF THE LOSS OR DAMAGE IN ISSUE IS CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED BY THE NEGLIGENCE, BREACH OF WARRANTY, DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS, VIOLATIONS OF THE DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, OR OTHER FAULT OF WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY OR WESTERN STATES FIRE PROTECTION COMPANY'S PARENT, SUBSIDIARIES, AFFILIATES, CONSULTANTS, SUBCONTRACTORS, VENDORS, OR THEIR RESPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. SHOULD CLIENT DESIRE A DIFFERENT LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SUCH IS AVAILABLE AS AN ADDITIONAL SERVICE AT AN ADDITIONAL COST. IF PAYMENT FOR WORK PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT PAID WHEN DUE, CLIENT AGREES TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AS WELL AS INTEREST COMPUTED AT THE HIGHEST RATE ALLOWABLE BY APPLICABLE STATE LAW. ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT/PROPOSAL THE ABOVE PRICES SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE AS OUTLINED ABOVE. Please contact : Bryan Kelley at phone number: (503) Name Signature

102 10/15/12 LI4120 PARKING l Owner YES NA NO A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? B. Owner/Owner Rep. Name. KEN NI C. Signature:. A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? 6C C Before Test RELIABLE 6 RISER ROOM PARKING/STORAGE YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 65 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 37 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. 37 G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? Main Drain Test Valve Information A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve Partial Trip Test A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. YES NA NO C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Sec. 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 8/1/09 A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. 32 D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. 31 E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 34 Sec. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. 48 Sec. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. 34 Sec. 5 Year Internal Inspection Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? 8/1/09 A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 1872 SW Broadway NO Dry Valve Inspection

103 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information Parking 3 12th and Montgomery Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

104 10/12/12 LI4120 Parking 3 GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves No. of Valves Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO s MAIN CONTROL 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located MAIN DRAIN Size Test Pipe Before Flow After Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 12th and Montgomery YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

105 10/12/12 LI4120 Parking 3 WET SYSTEMS YES NO A. No. of Systems NA Make & Model B. Was the date of the gauge(s) checked, since gauges are required to be tested with a calibrated gauge or replaced every five years? If tested with a calibrated gauge and the gauge was not within 3% over the full scale they must be recalibrated or replaced C. If applicable, have any dry type heads more than 10 years old had a representative sample tested D. Has the owner or owner's representative been advised that cold weather valves are not recommended by NFPA? E. Have all known and readily apparent antifreeze systems been tested? F. Date antifreeze systems were tested G. The antifreeze tests indicate protection to temperature: Sys. 1 Sys. 2 Sys.3 Sys. 4 Sys.5 H. Did alarm valves, water flow alarm indicators and retards test satisfactorily? DRY SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems 1 Make & Model CSC 6IN-175-DPV Date last trip tested 9/14/2011 Partia Full B. Are the air pressure and priming water levels normal? C. Did the air compressor operate satisfactorily? D. Were readily accessible and visible low points drained during this inspection? E. Were dry system trip tests performed? (If yes, see DPV Trip Test Report) F. Do dry valves appear to be protected from freezing? G. Is the dry valve house heated? SPECIAL SYSTEMS Qtly. A. No. of systems NA Make & Model B. Were all known valves tested as required? C. Did all heat responsive systems operate satisfactorily: D. Did the supervisory features operate during testing? Heat Responsive Devices of Test Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Valve No Auxiliary Equipment No. ALARMS Location Testing Results A. Did the water motor(s) and gong(s) operate during testing? B. Did the electric alarm(s) operate during testing? C. Did the supervisory alarm service test satisfactorily? D. Was the alarm panel free of alarm and trouble signals upon your arrival If no, please explain below E. Was the alarm panel clear of alarm and trouble signals upon your departure If no, please explain below SPRINKLERS - PIPING A. Do sprinklers generally appear to be in good external condition? B. Do sprinklers generally appear to be free of corrosion or loading and visible obstructions? C. Are extra sprinklers available on the premises? D. Does the exterior condition of the fire sprinkler system appear to be satisfactory? E. Does hand hose on the sprinkler system appear to be in satisfactory condition? YES NO EPLANATION OF ANY PREVIOUS ANSWERS ABOVE THAT MAY REPRESENT A PROBLEM, OR COMMENTS FROM THE INSPECTOR. Priming level was very high. Air compressor too small to fill system in 30 minutes. Valve will not hold priming water when attempting to set up. Dry standpipes last tested th and Montgomery Page 2 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

106 10/12/12 LI4120 Parking 3 THE INSPECTOR SUGGESTS THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER, THESE SUGGESTIONS ARE NOT THE RESULT OF AN ENGINEERING SURVEY: Install larger tank mounted air compressor. Replace dry pipe valve rubber if available. ADJUSTMENTS OR CORRECTIONS MADE: ALL LISTED CHANGES IN THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD OR FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT, AS ADVISED BY THE OWNER IN SECTION: Signature of Owner or Owner's Representative Printed Name Date: 1/0/00 Does the owner/owner's representative want a copy of this report sent to another location? (i.e. Insurance, Main Office, etc.) DUPLICATE TO: STREET: ZIP: CITY & STATE: ATTN: 12th and Montgomery Page 3 Fire Sprinkler Inspection

107 10/12/12 LI4120 Parking 3 Owner A. Has the owner/owner rep. been notified that the low point drains need to be maintained all year long? YES NA NO Valve Information A. Valve Serial Numbers B. Manufactures Name C. Manufacturers Date (year) D. Valve Model E. Valve Size F. Location? G. Area protected by Dry system? CSC YES NA A. Does Air compressor appear to be free of physical damage and be operating properly at the time of the inspection? B. Does the exterior of valve appear to be in good condition and both gauges operable at the time of inspection? C. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Water Supply pressure gauge. 65 D. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the System side (air) pressure gauge. 46 E. Is system control valve in OPEN position? F. Do the trim valves appear to be in their appropriate open or closed positions at the time of inspection? G. Does the exterior of QOD appear to be in good condition and gauge operable at the time of inspection? H. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the QOD pressure gauge. 44 G. Is the pressure gauge on QOD indicating the same pressure as the air gauge on the system side of the dry pipe valve? H. Does the QOD appear to be free from leakage at the time of inspection? I. Does the intermediate chamber appear to be free from leakage at the time of the inspection? Main Drain Test A. Record system static pressure (psi) before opening main drain valve. 65 B. Record system residual pressure (psi) with main drain valve open. 45 C. Record system static pressure (psi) after closing main drain valve. 55 Partial Trip Test YES NA A. Was partial trip test of the dry pipe valve conducted with control valve partially opened? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. 16 C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. 16 D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. 15 E. Record the time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. DT 3rd Year Full Trip Test Date last Full trip Test was performed? 9/8/10 A. Was a full flow trip test of dry valve conducted with control valve opened fully? B. Record the pressure (psi) shown on the Air gauge When Supervisory Signals Occurred. C. Record the pressure that the QOD operates. D. Record air pressure (psi) at trip of dry valve. E. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. F. Record time in seconds that it took for the water to reach the inspectors test. G. Record time in seconds between the start of test and trip of valve. Date last Internal inspection and cleaning was performed? 5 Year Internal Inspection A. Was internal inspection of dry pipe valve conducted this year? B. Do all components appear to operate properly and move freely? C. Has valve been cleaned and appear to be in good condition? After Test IN-175-DPV PARKING Before Test 6 LOWER PARKING Is priming water level correct at the time of inspection? A. Does the air pressure maintained appear to be at proper setting for system? B. Have all known drum drip/low point drain been drained and inspected during the inspection? 12th and Montgomery NO NO Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Dry Valve Inspection

108 SERVICE NAME: Parking 3 CONTACT PERSON: Kevin Johnson TITLE: PHONE: OWNER/MGMTCO/CONTRACTOR: Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR (503) (503) Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY TEST AND MAINTENANCE REPORT CUSTOMER MUST RETAIN A COPY OF THIS REPORT FOR A MINIMUM OF THREE YEARS WATER DIST/AUTHORITY: METER ACCOUNT NO: TEST NO: SERVICE ADDRESS: Portland Or Portland Or MAILING ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON: TITLE: PHONE: NEW: EISTING: REPLACEMENT FOR: USE: CONTAINMENT: ISOLATION: DOMESTIC: FIRE: IRRIGATION: PROCESS: ASSEMBLY TYPE: REDUCED PRESSURE: DOUBLE CHECK: PRESSURE VACUUM BREAKER: MFG: MODEL NO: SIZE: SERIAL NO: DATE INSTALLED: LAST INSPECTION: LINE PRESSURE: PSI. LOCATION: Check No. 1 (PVB, RP, DC) INITIAL RESULTS RE-TEST RESULTS COMMENTS TIGHTNESS TIGHTNESS DIFFERENTIAL Check No. 2 (RC, DC) Relief Valve (RP) Buffer (RP) Air Inlet (PVB) Shut-off Valve No. 1 Shut-off Valve No. 2 REPAIR/COMMENTS ASSEMBLY MECHANICAL TEST: Pass Fail If mechanical test fails, the water purveyor/authority must be notified immediately and repairs made as soon as possible. ALARM COMPANY NOTIFICATION: TURN-OFF DATE: TIME: TURN-ON DATE: TIME: TECHNICIAN CERTIFIES THIS ASSEMBLY HAS BEEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.S.S.E. PROCEDURE TESTERS NAME: TESTERS PHONE: TESTERS SIGNATURE: CERTIFICATION NO 1: CERTIFICATION NO 2: EPIRES: EPIRES: TEST GAUGE: GAUGE RE-CERT DATE: OWNER OR AGENT SIGNATURE: Signature indicates verification by signer that the isolation valves are in the open position after the test is completed. BFP

109 Date: 10/12/12 Time: 7:00 AM Job Number: LI4120 Technician: Jeff Wall Annual Sprinkler Inspection Job Site Information Parkway Housing 1609 SW PARK Portland Or Kevin Johnson Billing Information PSU 121 SW Morrison Portland Or Western States fire Protection CO Fir Street, Suite B Oregon City, OR Phone Number (503) Fax Number (503) API Group Inc. is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council Western States Fire Protection Albuquerque, NM: Centennial, CO: Fort Collins, CO: Pflugerville, T: San Antonio, T: Nampa, ID: Casper, WY: Lakewood, CA: Colorado Springs, CO: Houston, T: Phoenix, AZ: Spokane, WA: Missoula, MT: Glenwood Springs, CO: Black Hawk, SD: Grand Prairie, T: Oregon City, OR: Redmond, WA: Sacramento, CA: Upland, CA: El Paso, T: National Fire Suppression Decatur, IL: Kansas City, KS: Maryland Heights, MO: Statewide Fire Protection Las Vegas, NV

110 10/12/12 LI4120 Parkway Housing GENERAL YES NA NO A. (To be answered by the Owner or the Owner's representative) Was owner available? 1. Have there been any changes in the occupancy classification, machinery or operations since the last inspection? 2. Have there been any changes or repairs to the fire protection systems since the last inspection? 3. If a fire occurred since the last inspection, have all damaged sprinkler system components been replaced? 4. Has the piping in all dry systems been checked for proper pitch within the past five years? Date last checked 5. Has the piping in all systems been checked for obstructive materials? Date last checked 6. Have all fire pumps been tested to their full capacity through the use of hose streams or flow meters within the past 12 months? 7. Are gravity, surface or pressure tanks protected from freezing? 8. Are any of the sprinklers 50 years old or older? (Testing and/or replacement is recommended for such sprinklers.) 9. Are any extra high temperature solder sprinklers regularly exposed to temperatures near 300 F? B. (To be answered by the inspector) 1. Have the sprinkler systems been extended to all visible areas of the building? 2. Does there appear to be proper clearance between the top of all storage and the sprinkler deflector? 3. In building areas protected by a wet system, does it appear to be heated, including its blind attics and perimeter areas, where accessible? 4. Does it appear that visible exterior openings are protected against the entrance of cold air? CONTROL VALVES A. Are sprinkler system main control valves readily visible and in the appropriate open or closed position? B. If the valve(s) had seals were they broken in order to operate the valves? C. Was the Owner or the Owner's representative notified that the seal(s) were removed if they could not be replaced? Control Valves MAIN CONTROL 2 OS&Y SUPERVISED 1ST FLOOR 1 OS&Y SUPERVISED 2ND FLOOR 1 OS&Y SUPERVISED 3RD FLOOR 1 OS&Y SUPERVISED 4TH FLOOR 1 OS&Y SUPERVISED 5TH FLOOR 1 OS&Y SUPERVISED WATER SUPPLIES Fire Pump & Tank A. Water supply source, City or Private? City Fire Pump & City Fire Pump & Pond Other Water flow Test Results Made During This Inspection Test Pipe Located No. of Valves Size Test Pipe Before Flow After MAIN DRAIN NA 81 Easily Accessible Signs Valve Open Supervision Sealed,Supervised or Operational Yes No Yes No Yes No Locked Yes NO Test Pipe Located Size Test Pipe Before Flow s After TANKS, PUMPS, FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIONS A. Do fire pumps, gravity, surface or pressure tanks appear to be in good external condition? B. It appears that gravity, surface and pressure tanks are at the proper pressure and/or water levels? C. It appears that fire department connections are in satisfactory condition, couplings free, caps or plugs in place and check valves tight? D. Are fire department connections visible and accessible? 1609 SW PARK YES NA NO Page 1 Fire Sprinkler Inspection