COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation January 19, 2011 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN. File No Project Manager: Amy Hutzel

Transcription

1 COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation January 19, 2011 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN File No Project Manager: Amy Hutzel RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $400,000 to the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association to pursue implementation of recommendations in the Ocean Beach Master Plan by conducting a traffic circulation and access study, developing a joint coastal management framework, and developing a joint open space management agreement among the multiple management entities. LOCATION: Ocean Beach, City and County of San Francisco PROGRAM CATEGORY: San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location Maps Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Sections of the Public Resources Code: The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes disbursement of up to $400,000 (four hundred thousand dollars) to the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) to pursue implementation of recommendations in the Ocean Beach Master Plan (Master Plan) by conducting a traffic circulation and access study, developing a joint coastal management framework, and developing a joint open space management agreement among the multiple management entities. This authorization is subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the disbursement of funds, SPUR shall submit for the review and approval of the Executive Officer of the Conservancy a final work program, schedule and budget; and the scopes of work and the roster of contractors to be employed in the project. 2. SPUR shall develop the project in consultation with the Golden Gate National Recreation Area and the City and County of San Francisco. Page 1 of 9

2 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the current Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines, last updated by the Conservancy on November 10, The proposed authorization is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy Program, Chapter 4.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code. 3. The San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association is a non-profit organization existing under 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, and whose purposes are consistent with Division 21 of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT SUMMARY: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy authorize disbursement of up to $400,000 (four hundred thousand dollars) to the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR) to pursue implementation of recommendations in the Ocean Beach Master Plan (Master Plan) by conducting a traffic circulation and access study, developing a joint coastal management framework, and developing a joint open space management agreement among the multiple management entities. Ocean Beach lies within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), along the west side of San Francisco (see Exhibit 1). It is jointly owned and managed by the GGNRA (the beach) and the City and County of San Francisco (the road and parking). At five-miles long, it is one of the longest urban beaches in the country. Ocean Beach has the potential to become one of the most spectacular metropolitan beaches in the world, but currently suffers from erosion, neglect and a lack of amenities. The Conservancy provided a $300,000 grant to SPUR in May of 2010 to develop a Master Plan for Ocean Beach. The Master Plan effort has, in less than 18 months, achieved an unprecedented level of cooperation and consensus among the management agencies and key stakeholders at Ocean Beach, after previous planning efforts that had faltered for various reasons. The Master Plan is nearing completion (the final report will be released in February or March of 2012), with draft recommendations presented to stakeholders in October of 2011 (Exhibit 2). The recommendations reflect a robust process involving many stakeholders and have received broad, enthusiastic support. The recommendations address major issues and processes at Ocean Beach, including climate change and sea level rise; erosion; natural resources protection; public access and recreation; vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access and circulation; and implementation, management and maintenance. There are six key recommendations, divided between the south, middle, and north reaches of Ocean Beach, as follows: South Reach (Skyline Blvd. to Sloat Blvd.): 1) Reroute the Great Highway behind the San Francisco Zoo via Sloat and Skyline Boulevards. 2) Introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection, restoration, and access system. Page 2 of 9

3 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN Middle Reach (Sloat Blvd to south end of Golden Gate Park): 3) Reduce the width of the Great Highway to provide amenities and managed retreat. 4) Conduct native dune restoration in key locations. North Reach (south end of Golden Gate Park to the south end of Lands End): 5) Create a better connection between Golden Gate Park and Ocean Beach. 6) Implement bicycle and pedestrian improvements north of Balboa St. The Master Plan is a non-regulatory guidance document and its implementation will depend on sustained engagement of stakeholders and management agencies. This authorization would enable SPUR to pursue implementation of the recommendations in coordination with the appropriate partner agency while keeping the public engaged and political support high and working to secure implementation funding. Specifically, SPUR will conduct the following activities: Implementation Leadership and Coordination: For each of the implementation actions below, SPUR will serve as the coordinator and manager, providing continuity of leadership and maintaining the key relationships developed to date. SPUR will coordinate closely with partner agencies to pursue and secure additional funding, build political momentum, and maintain the focused engagement of all partners. SPUR will lead public communications and steward the core principles of the Master Plan through the full range of implementation efforts. SPUR will identify and seek funds for implementation of the Master Plan recommendations, including from the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the Cosco-Busan Oil Spill Settlement, the National Park Service, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Traffic Circulation and Access Study: The recommended approach to coastal management at Ocean Beach will require significant reconfiguration of roadways, in particular the closure of the Great Highway south of Sloat Blvd. and the rerouting of traffic via Sloat and Skyline Blvds. This will require the reconfiguration of several intersections and the redesign of Sloat Blvd. into a multi-modal coastal gateway. SPUR will 1) conduct traffic analysis of the Great Highway rerouting and associated roadway and intersection reconfigurations, 2) coordinate with ongoing city transportation plans and studies, including the 19 th Avenue Corridor Study, 3) plan for an extension of the L-Taraval rail line to the Zoo entrance, 4) develop an area-wide parking management plan, including a reconfigured access plan for the San Francisco Zoo parking lot, and 5) develop a roadway configuration and design. Joint Coastal Management Framework: The coastal management recommendations will require significant analysis and their implementation will depend on agreement among GGNRA, USACE, and SFPUC. A joint coastal management framework will define an agreed upon set of triggers and actions for adaptation to rising sea levels and associated coastal hazards at Ocean Beach. SPUR will facilitate the development of a Joint Coastal Management Framework, to provide the basis of a formal agreement among the agencies responsible for and affected by coastal management. Elements will include: coastal engineering studies, phasing plan with climate and erosion triggers, economic and cost benefit analysis, and coordination on capital project planning. Page 3 of 9

4 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN Joint Open Space Management Agreement: Ocean Beach is experienced as a single place, but to date, management of Ocean Beach as an open space resource has been divided among several public agencies, namely GGNRA, San Francisco Department of Recreation and Parks, SFPUC, and the San Francisco Zoo. SPUR will facilitate the creation of a joint open space management agreement or similar structure, to both improve day-to-day operations and maintenance and allow for future improvements to public access and amenities, as recommended in the Master Plan. This effort will include drafting a management agreement and facilitating its execution, developing an open space and programming plan, developing a cost and revenue sharing framework, and doing a schematic design of public access improvements. SPUR is a long-standing 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization formed in 1910 as the San Francisco Planning and Housing Association, and changed to the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association in SPUR is a public policy think tank that seeks to promote good planning and good government through research, analysis, public education and advocacy. SPUR has extensive experience with planning, land use, transportation and economic issues in San Francisco, including revitalization of San Francisco as the Bay Area s urban core. SPUR has done excellent work developing the Ocean Beach Master Plan under the previous Conservancy grant. Site Description: Ocean Beach lies within GGNRA, along the west side of San Francisco. It is jointly owned and managed by GGNRA (the beach) and the City and County of San Francisco (the road and parking). At five-miles long, it is one of the longest urban beaches in the country. The project area is bounded by Golden Gate Park and residential areas to the East, Fort Funston to the South and cliffs to the North (see Exhibit 1). Even with its current lack of amenities, Ocean Beach is annually visited by as many as two million people for activities such as walking, picnicking, jogging, dog walking, surfing and fishing. The Master Plan includes recommendations to enhance the visitor experience, including improved access between Golden Gate Park and Ocean Beach and improved bicycle connections from Ocean Beach to the north. Ocean Beach also provides habitat for plants and animals, including the Western snowy plover, a federally threatened species, and the bank swallow, a state-listed threatened species. There are large dune areas, which are primarily vegetated with European beach grass. The Master Plan includes recommendations for dune restoration in the middle reach. Ocean Beach is facing a severe coastal erosion issue in the south reach (between Sloat and Skyline Blvds.) which has caused temporary closures of that section of the Great Highway and prompted the City of San Francisco to undertake emergency repairs and seek Coastal Commission permits for additional work. The Corps deposits dredged materials to the south of the shipping channels entering San Francisco Bay, which have resulted in the growth of the northern end of Ocean Beach. However, due to where the sediments are placed and offshore dynamics, there is no (or limited) deposition on the southern end of Ocean Beach, which is eroding away and threatening the Great Highway. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission manages major infrastructure within the bounds of the project area, namely the Oceanside Wastewater Treatment Plant, and the associated Lake Merced Wastewater Tunnel, Southwest Ocean Outfall, and the sewer transport boxes that run under the Great Highway. This infrastructure is susceptible to sea level rise and coastal erosion to varying degrees, and was a significant driver in the Master Plan process. Page 4 of 9

5 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN The Great Highway and Sloat Boulevard are major traffic corridors in the area, but are both oversized. The Master Plan includes recommendations for improved traffic circulation, which would allow for the permanent closure of the Great Highway south of Sloat and a reduction in size of the Great Highway north of Sloat Blvd., which allows for more creative solutions to the coastal erosion issue, allows for a greater level of managed retreat from sea level rise, and allows for increased public amenities. Project History: In 2000, residents, businesses, government entities and community-based organizations came together to coordinate the activities of the many government agencies involved in the Ocean Beach area, as well as develop an active grassroots movement to support its revitalization and protection. This group identified the need for a single document that integrates the requirements of the natural environment and green spaces, the desires of area residents, recreational opportunities, as well as the plans and expertise of the number of public agencies maintaining the area. In early 2008, Mayor Gavin Newsom created the Ocean Beach Vision Council, whose main task was to create a Master Plan for revitalizing Ocean Beach. The Conservancy authorized a $300,000 grant to SPUR in May of 2010 to develop the Master Plan, building upon the work of the Ocean Beach Vision Council. Through the Master Plan effort, SPUR developed a set of far reaching and multi-objective recommendations. This authorization would allow for SPUR to take the next step in ensuring the recommendations are implemented by the public agencies responsible for management of Ocean Beach. PROJECT FINANCING: Coastal Conservancy $400,000 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission $300,000 National Park Service $125,000 Total Project Cost $825,000 Conservancy funds are anticipated to come from the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 84). Proposition 84 funds may be used for the purposes of promoting access to and enjoyment of the coastal resources of the State in accordance with the provisions of the Conservancy s enabling legislation, Division 21 of the Public Resources Code. Consistent with the purposes of Proposition 84, the proposed project will be undertaken pursuant to the San Francisco Bay Area Conservancy Program (Chapter 4.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code), and will consist of planning and related activities necessary to assist, promote and enhance access to and visitor-serving amenities at Ocean Beach in the City and County of San Francisco. The SFPUC has indicated in their budget documents, which are subject to approvals by the Mayor and Board of Supervisors, an appropriation of $300,000 for this effort over the next two fiscal years. The SFPUC may be able to increase their contribution. The National Park Service has committed $125,000 towards the efforts to implement the Ocean Beach Master Plan, using funds intended for transportation enhancements within GGNRA. Funds are also being sought for the project through the San Francisco County Transportation Authority. In addition, the project will benefit from the in-kind services of members of the steering committee and advisory committee. Page 5 of 9

6 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY S ENABLING LEGISLATION: The proposed project is consistent with Chapter 4.5 of Division 21 of the Public Resources Code, sections regarding San Francisco Bay projects. Pursuant to Section 31162, the Conservancy may award grants in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area that help to achieve various specific goals, including the goals of increasing public access to the coast, protecting natural habitats and open space resources of regional importance, and promoting projects that provide open space and natural areas accessible to urban populations for recreational purposes. The proposed project is located entirely within the County of San Francisco. Consistent with Section 31162(a), the proposed project will plan for improved public access to the coast and improved connection of population centers to the coast through efforts to implement the Master Plan recommendations. The proposed project will not have a significant adverse effect on agricultural operations, environmentally sensitive areas or wildlife; in fact, the Master Plan recommends dune restoration to better protect environmentally sensitive habitat areas and wildlife and changes in traffic circulation to allow for improved public amenities, enhanced habitat, and managed retreat from sea level rise. Consistent with Section 31162(b), the proposed project, which will pursue implementation of the Master Plan recommendations, will increase protection of natural habitats, scenic areas and open-space resources of regional importance in the Ocean Beach area. Consistent with Section 31162(c), the activities proposed for funding will serve to assist in carrying out the policies of the City and County of San Francisco s certified Local Coastal Program, as discussed in detail in the CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM POLICIES section, below, as well as the policies governing the GGNRA. Consistent with Section 31162(d), the activities proposed for funding will assist and promote a project whose major purpose is to provide increased accessibility of the Ocean Beach area to urban populations for recreational and educational purposes. In addition, the proposed project satisfies criteria for determining project priority under Section 31163(c), as follows: (1) the proposed project is multijurisdictional (Ocean Beach is jointly owned and managed by the National Park Service as part of the GGNRA and the City and County of San Francisco) and will serve a regional consistency (Ocean Beach receives over two million visitors annually, including residents and tourists); (2) the proposed project will be implemented in a timely way (anticipated to start immediately); (3), the proposed project will include matching funds from other sources (SFPUC and GGNRA); and (4) the project is fully consistent with and supported by adopted local plans, as described in the Consistency with Local Coastal Program Policies section, below. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY S 2007 STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL(S) & OBJECTIVE(S): Consistent with Goal 1, Objective C of the Conservancy s 2007 Strategic Plan, the proposed project will plan for the creation or improvement of approximately 3.5 miles of the Coastal Trail. Page 6 of 9

7 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN Consistent with Goal 6, Objective G, the proposed project will facilitate development and implementation of efforts to manage shoreline erosion. Consistent with Goal 11, Objective A, the proposed project will facilitate implementation of a plan that provides for recreational opportunities. Consistent with Goal 11, Objective H, the proposed project will develop a plan for community connectors that link an urban area to the Coastal Trail. CONSISTENCY WITH CONSERVANCY S PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA & GUIDELINES: The proposed project is consistent with the Conservancy s Project Selection Criteria and Guidelines, last updated on November 10, 2011, in the following respects: Required Criteria 1. Promotion of the Conservancy s statutory programs and purposes: See the Consistency with Conservancy s Enabling Legislation section above. 2. Consistency with purposes of the funding source: See the Project Financing section above. 3. Support of the public: The proposed project is supported by Senator Dianne Feinstein, State Senator Leland Yee (District 8), State Assemblymember Fiona Ma (District 12), Supervisors Eric Mar (District 1) and Carmen Chu (District 4), Surfrider, Save The Waves, and many individuals who reside near or use Ocean Beach. Please see letters in Exhibit Location: The proposed project is located on the Pacific Coast waterfront of the City and County of San Francisco, which is within the nine-county Bay Area. 5. Need: Conservancy funds are needed to leverage SFPUC and GGNRA funds and allow SPUR to begin work immediately, which will sustain the engagement of agencies and stakeholders. 6. Greater-than-local interest: Located within the City and County of San Francisco and the GGNRA, Ocean Beach receives over two million visitors annually, from local to international origin. 7. Sea level rise vulnerability: The Master Plan addresses sea level rise, laying out an ambitious and new approach to management of Ocean Beach in the face of coastal erosion and sea level rise. This proposed next phase of work will develop a new traffic circulation plan that will allow for managed retreat, as well as phasing plans with triggers for adapting to sea level rise and associated coastal erosion. Additional Criteria 8. Urgency: Winter storms in December 2009 and January 2010 have eroded between 30 and 70 feet of bluff along Ocean Beach, affecting the Great Highway, the Lake Merced Wastewater Tunnel and the Southwest Ocean Outfall Pipe. The recommendations in the Master Plan squarely address this issue and need to be moved towards implementation. Page 7 of 9

8 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN 9. Resolution of more than one issue: The proposed project addresses the following elements by pursuing the implementation of the Master Plan s multi-objective recommendations: climate change and sea level rise; coastal erosion; natural resources protection; public access and recreation; vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian access and circulation; and implementation, management and maintenance. 10. Leverage: See the Project Financing section above. 11. Conflict resolution: A comprehensive public engagement process took place as part of the Master Plan development, and included three public workshops, numerous community presentations, an Advisory Committee and Steering Committee that each met several times, and a robust online and social media presence, and an exhibit at SPUR s Urban Center. These efforts have deepened public understanding of the challenges and constraints at Ocean Beach and have resulted in a set of broad, multi-objective recommendations that resolve multiple conflicts. 12. Readiness: The proposed project will commence as soon as funds are authorized, and will be completed within three years. 13. Cooperation: The proposed project will build upon the stakeholder engagement to date and the cooperation of the public agencies involved in management of Ocean Beach. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM POLICIES: The proposed project is consistent with the applicable policies contained in the land use plan portion of the City and County of San Francisco s certified Local Coastal Program (certified March 14, 1986), namely the Western Shoreline Plan: A Part of the Master Plan of the City and County of San Francisco (adopted by the San Francisco City Planning Commission by Resolution No on April 18, 1985). The Western Shoreline Plan covers a six-mile area from the Point Lobos recreational area in the north to the Fort Funston cliff area in the south, and includes Lake Merced, the San Francisco Zoo, Ocean Beach, the Great Highway, Golden Gate Park, and the Sutro Heights Park and Sutro Baths. Much of this planning area will be within the scope of the Ocean Beach Master Plan, which is consistent with the following Western Shoreline Plan policies: Consistent with Transportation Policies 1 and 2, the proposed project will seek to improve east-west public transit connections to Ocean Beach, and improve connections amongst the coastal recreation destinations (e.g., the zoo, etc). Consistent with The Great Highway Policy 4, the proposed project will seek to provide for a continuous Class 1 bicycle trail; consistent with Policy 6, the proposed project will seek to improve public access to Ocean Beach from Golden Gate Park; consistent with Policies 7-8, the proposed project will seek to address safe and flexible parking areas; consistent with Policies 9-11, the proposed project will seek to improve pedestrian safety at crossings and parking areas. Consistent with the Golden Gate Park Objective (No. 3), the proposed project will seek to enhance the recreational connection between Golden Gate Park and the beach frontage by strengthening visual and physical connections. Consistent with The Zoo Objective (No. 4), the proposed project will seek to improve the quality of the zoo s relationship to the coastal zone recreational system. Page 8 of 9

9 OCEAN BEACH MASTER PLAN Consistent with the Ocean Beach Objective (No. 6), the proposed project will seek to maintain and enhance the recreational use of the Ocean Beach shoreline. Consistent with Policies 1 and 2, the proposed project will seek to continue and maintain the beach s natural areas; consistent with Policies No. 3-4, the proposed project will seek to maintain and improve the beach s natural appearance and physical condition; consistent with Policy No. 5, the proposed project will seek to enhance the enjoyment of visitors by providing for convenient visitor-oriented services. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA: The proposed planning project is statutorily and categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under two sections of the CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15000, et seq. The proposed planning activities are statutorily exempt pursuant to Section in that they will involve feasibility and planning analysis for possible future action that has not yet been adopted, approved or funded and they will include consideration of environmental factors. The planning activities are likewise categorically exempt under to the extent that they involve basic data collection and resource evaluation activities. Staff will file a Notice of Exemption upon approval of the project. Page 9 of 9

10 Project Location Exhibit 1 Project Location Map

11 San Rafael Larkspur Richmond Corte Madera El Cerrito Mill Valley Tiburon Albany Berkeley Sausalito Oakland Bay Area Ridge Trail Alameda Ocean Beach Master Plan Area San Francisco miles Daly City Colma Brisbane OCEAN BEACH Regional Map

12 Fort Point Mason St Crissy Field Palace of Fine Arts Fort Mason Presidio of San Francisco Lombard St China Beach Jackson St Divisadero St Van Ness Ave Lincoln Blvd Arguello Blvd Presidio Ave Broadway St Pine St Fillmore St Bush St Lincoln Park California St Sutro Heights Park 36th Ave 25 th Ave Geary Blvd 14th Ave Funston Ave Fulton St University of San Francisco Turk St Fell St Alamo Square Gough St Frankli n St Oak St Golden Gate Park Buena Vista Park Duboce Park Market St Lincoln Way 19th Ave 16th St 17th St Ocean Beach Master Plan Area Judah St Lawton St Mission Dolores Park Dolores St Guerrero St Ocean Beach Great Hwy 46th Ave Sunset Blvd Noriega St 28th Ave i d g e T r a i l R Castro St 24th St Clipper St B a y A r e a Taraval St Vicente St Porto la Dr San Francisco Zoo Sloat Blvd San Francisco State University Junipero Serra Blvd Holloway Ave Ocean Ave Monterey Blvd San Jose Ave Mission St Silver Ave Naples St Ca miles Fort Funston Lake Merced Blvd Plymouth Ave Alemany Blvd OCEAN BEACH Geneva Ave Persia Ave Site-Scale Map

13 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations public workshop 3 click to edit master title style october 29, october 29, 2011

14 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations draft recommendations october 29, 2011

15 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations ü analysis to 2100 horizon ü recommendations to 2050 ü non-regulatory guidance document ü ongoing monitoring + adaptive management ü re-evaluation in 2030 october 29,

16 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations south reach 2 4 middle reach north reach 6 1 six (6) key moves SOUTH REACH KEY MOVE 1 : Reroute Great Highway behind the Zoo via Sloat and Skyline KEY MOVE 2 : Introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection/restoration/access system MIDDLE REACH KEY MOVE 3 : Reduce width of Great Highway to provide Amenities / Managed Retreat KEY MOVE 4 : Middle Reach Native Dune Restoration NORTH REACH KEY MOVE 5 : Better Connection between Golden Gate Park and Beach KEY MOVE 6 : Bicycle + pedestrian improvements north of Balboa october 29,

17 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations SOUTH REACH october 29,

18 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 1 reroute great highway behind the zoo via sloat and skyline october 29,

19 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 1 : reroute great highway behind the zoo via sloat and skyline 1.1 reconfigure sloat/great highway and sloat/skyline intersections 1.2 maintain 1-lane out southbound from oceanside treatment plant (OTP) for trucks 1.3 reconfigure sloat blvd, with parking along zoo boundary, permeable pavement, bikeway, and coastal access amenities 1.4 pull L-taraval south across sloat, terminus at zoo gate 1.5 introduce coastal trail to ft funston 1.6 connect N-S to california coastal trail, linking lake merced all the way to marin 1.7 replace beach/zoo parking along armory road and using OTP roof 1.8 reopen armory road: skyline to zoo lot october 29,

20 ocean beach master Exhibit plan 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations draft recommendations KEY MOVE 1 : reroute great highway behind the zoo via sloat and skyline 1.3 reconfigure sloat blvd, with parking along zoo boundary, permeable pavement, bikeway, and coastal access amenities october 29,

21 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 1 : reroute great highway behind the zoo via sloat and skyline BEFORE october 29,

22 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 1 : reroute great highway behind the zoo via sloat and skyline 1.3 reconfigure sloat blvd, with parking along zoo boundary, permeable pavement, bikeway, and coastal access amenities bike lane swale permeable paving AFTER october 29,

23 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 1 : reroute great highway behind the zoo via sloat and skyline benefits ü spectacular new coastal trail, continuous pedestrian connection ü enables significant retreat from coastal erosion ü more flexible infrastructure protection ü major improvements to sloat blvd design, with green infrastructure elements constraints ü some traffic impacts, likely minor ü requires reconfiguring zoo access ü cost of roadway and intersection improvements outstanding questions ü nature of traffic impacts? ü configuration of sloat blvd? ü funding sources? october 29,

24 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 2 introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection / restoration / access system october 29,

25 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 2 : introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection / restoration / access system 2.1 withdraw from bluff edge, incrementally demolish roadway, parking, restroom at sloat cobble berm + sand 2.2 reinforce the lake merced tunnel in place with a low profile structure or internal ballast, remove revetments and fill 2.3 sand nourishment via army corps,develop and pursue best practices for beach nourishment 2.4 cobble berm over lm tunnel covered by sand (via army corps sand nourishment) serves as wave dissipation zone; overwash occurs during severe storm events 2.5 second cobble berm protects force mains, high ground at pump station, fleishhacker bldg october 29,

26 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 2 (cont) : introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection / restoration / access system vegetated seawall 2.6 terraced, vegetated seawall with cobble toe along oceanside treatment plant, incorporating tunnel structure, coastal trail, erodible bluff (banks swallow habitat), and plant driveway 2.7 create detention swale (through zoo) and constructed wetland to passively clean and infiltrate stormwater from sloat blvd and adjacent parking 2.8 fleishhacker bldg renovated as warming hut and interpretive center 2.9 pump station, force mains remain; interpretive elements explain the system to visitors. beautify pump station and reconfigure to maximize adjacent coastal access constructed wetland 2.10 conduct near-term pilot studies of dynamic coastal protection october 29,

27 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations KEY MOVE 2 : introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection / restoration / access system 2.4 cobble berm over lm tunnel covered by sand (via army corps sand nourishment) serves as wave dissipation zone; overwash occurs during severe storm events 2.5 second cobble berm protects force mains, high ground at pump station, fleishhacker bldg october 29,

28 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations KEY MOVE 2 : introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection / restoration / access system zoo parking lot bluff fleishhacker pool bldg back beach second cobble berm cobble berm + sand detention pond force mains lake merced tunnel october 29,

29 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations october 29,

30 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations revetments exposed fill ocean level 2011 BEFORE october 29,

31 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations cobble berm ocean level 2050 cobble berm + sand AFTER october 29,

32 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 2 : introduce a multi-purpose coastal protection / restoration / access system benefits ü incorporates significant coastal retreat ü protects costly infrastructure in place for decades ü a softer approach to coastal protection, that can work with coastal processes ü restores ecological and recreational function constraints ü significant up-front investment from multiple agencies ü challenging to maintain sand cover and surface restoration ü depends on careful integration with army corps beach nourishment ü new approach requiring careful study and monitoring outstanding questions ü can the tunnel be protected at a low enough profile for a reasonable cost? ü how will wave action interact with cobble and sand to shape the beach and berm? ü how will protection measures be phased to prevent spills, protect habitat, and manage cost? october 29,

33 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations MIDDLE REACH october 29,

34 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 3 reduce the width of great highway to provide amenities / managed retreat october 29,

35 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 3 : reduce the width of great highway to provide amenities / managed retreat 3.1 reduce great highway from 4 lanes to 2 at balboa-sloat, including wide shoulder for cycling/emergency access; use current south-bound lanes and median for dune restoration, amenities 3.2 reconfigure great highway/sloat intersection slightly inland, following transport box to avoid erosion 3.3 introduce small pockets of parking distributed at key access nodes 3.4 powered by wind and solarrestore existing restrooms; introduce 3 new off-the-grid restrooms 3.5 improve access at judah, taraval, rivera and noriega with trailheads/info, bike parking, vertical elements, etc 3.6 traffic calming and mitigation measures to lessen neighborhood traffic impacts 3.7 LID (Low-Impact Design) throughout adjacent neighborhoods to address stormwater management DETAIL october 29,

36 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 3 : reduce the width of great highway to provide amenities / managed retreat 3.1 reduce great highway from 4 lanes to 2 at balboa-sloat, including wide shoulder for cycling/emergency access; use current south-bound lanes and median for dune restoration, amenities 3.2 reconfigure great highway/sloat intersection slightly inland, following transport box to avoid erosion 3.3 introduce small pockets of parking distributed at key access nodes 3.4 restore existing restrooms; introduce 2-3 new off-the-grid (wind/solar) restrooms 3.5 improve access at judah, taraval, rivera and noriega with trailheads/info, bike parking, vertical elements, etc 3.6 traffic calming and mitigation measures to lessen neighborhood traffic impacts 3.7 LID (Low-Impact Design) throughout adjacent neighborhoods to address stormwater management DETAIL october 29,

37 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations october 29,

38 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations public restroom seating / play permeable parking bike share station signage KEY MOVE 3 : reduce the width of great highway to provide amenities / managed retreat october 29,

39 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 3 : reduce the width of great highway to provide amenities / managed retreat benefits ü a restored dune system is given space to migrate landward, allowing a wider beach as sea-level rise sets in. ü allows space for additional amenities, improved beach access ü favors pedestrians, bicycles, beach access, and wildlife over traffic flow constraints ü traffic impacts, which may be significant, in adjacent neighborhoods ü limited space gained at substantial cost ü potential to bring more users to plover habitat areas ü some redundancy between recreational trails outstanding questions ü what will traffic impacts be and to what degree can they be mitigated? ü how much additional beach width will result in the long run? october 29,

40 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 4 middle reach native dune restoration october 29,

41 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 4 : middle reach native dune restoration 4.1 sand nourishment via army corps of engineers along southern end of middle reach 4.2 dune restoration in key locations: especially at lincoln, vicente 4.3 sand ladders and modular boardwalks provide access while limiting impact dune restoration sand ladder october 29,

42 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations CA native dune profile non-native dune profile EXISTING non-native dune at OB PROPOSED native dune restoration october 29,

43 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 4 : middle reach native dune restoration benefits ü ecological restoration and improved aesthetics ü removal of non-native species ü lower profile will allow more visual access to the ocean ü potential for improved sand management with lower profile constraints ü significant cost ü challenge of fully removing non-native grasses ü access to dunes limited to protect restoration outstanding questions ü would a native dune form offer comparable coastal protection? ü to what degree would management of windblown sand be improved ü how can sand placed through beach nourishment best feed the dune system? october 29,

44 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations NORTH REACH october 29,

45 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 5 better connection between golden gate park and beach october 29,

46 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 5 : better connection between golden gate park and beach 5.1 tighten parking lot potentially replacing asphalt for permeable paving, preserve event/flex-space capacity 5.2 maintain row of watching the water parking 5.3 modify parking entrances, and improve pedestrian crossings at JFK/beach chalet 5.4 provide vertical arrival element / overlook at ends of golden gate park 5.5 add east side bike lanes (in both directions) north of fulton to balboa, connect bike trail with existing GGP trail right-ofway 5.6 add abundant bike parking 5.7 joint city/federal parking management plan, consider some fee parking on peak days 5.8 introduce landscape site elements and seating appropriate to rugged conditions and introduce and restore climate appropriate/native landscape golden gate park october 29,

47 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations KEY MOVE 5 : better connection between golden gate park and beach permeable parking + ocean overlook seating / overlook public restroom permeable parking 5.1 tighten parking lot potentially replacing asphalt for permeable paving, preserve event/flex-space capacity october 29,

48 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 5 : better connection between golden gate park and beach benefits ü a sense of arrival in a context-appropriate landscape ü improved basic amenities at the busiest access point ü maintains parking and event capacity while improving pedestrian and bicycle safety ü improved environmental performance with permeable paving, alternative energy constraints ü cost ü interagency management challenges october 29,

49 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 6 bicycle + pedestrian improvements north of balboa october 29,

50 ocean beach master Exhibit plan 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations draft recommendations KEY MOVE 6 : bicycle + pedestrian improvements north of balboa 6.1 narrow great highway north of balboa (from 4 to 2 lanes) 6.2 keep diagonal cliff house parking 6.3 narrow point lobos avenue from 4 lanes to 2, add 2-way separated bikeway on inland side; separated bikeway along cliff to prevent bicycle/vehicular conflict on steep slope 6.4 connect bike lane to bike trail to lands end and add bicycle box at pt lobos and 49 th october 29,

51 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 6 : bicycle + pedestrian improvements north of balboa BEFORE october 29,

52 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 6 : bicycle + pedestrian improvements north of balboa 6.3 narrow point lobos avenue from 4 lanes to 2, add 2-way separated bikeway on inland side; separated bikeway along cliff to prevent bicycle/vehicular conflict on steep slope 6.4 connect bike lane to bike trail to lands end and add bicycle box at pt lobos and 49 th AFTER october 29,

53 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations ocean beach master plan draft recommendations KEY MOVE 6 : bicycle + pedestrian improvements north of balboa benefits ü improved pedestrian, bicycle safety, shortened crossings ü improved aesthetics and street design ü maintains cliff house parking while reducing car-bike conflicts ü enhances key recreational connection to land s end, coastal trail constraints ü modest traffic impacts outstanding questions ü what is the optimal arrangement of bicycle lanes along point lobos avenue? ü what will the traffic impacts be? october 29,

54 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations key moves after 2050 ü with the same assumptions: ü additional armoring will likely be required ü availability of sand may change ü beach may become difficult to maintain ü revisit assumptions and adapt in 2030 ü infrastructure configuration ü private property acquisition october 29,

55 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations key moves key move 7 ocean beach master plan adaptive revision : 2030 ü better data on climate change ü advances in techniques and policies ü more public awareness ü 2 decades of proactive management ü 2 decades left in phase I october 29,

56 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations implementation updates ü Army Corps beach nourishment process update ü Environmental Review Documents Pending ü Beneficial Reuse Plan in Draft Form ü Dredge retrofit awaiting funding october 29,

57 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations implementation updates ü OBMP implementation roadmap in progress ü projects ü lead and partner agencies ü regulatory process ü funding opportunities october 29,

58 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations implementation updates ü Several efforts already pending ü Recreation and Open Space Element (SF General Plan) ü GGNRA General Management Plan Update (in Draft) ü Urban Watersheds Framework (SFPUC) ü "Tier 5" Westside Transportation Study (meeting 11/2, SFSU) october 29,

59 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations 09/11 10/11 11/11 12/11 01/12 02/12 PAC 5 public workshop 3 PAC 6 PAC briefing session PAC 7 public presentation recommendations draft master plan (MP) MP document draft final master plan october 29,

60 Exhibit 2: Ocean Beach Master Plan Presentation: Draft Recommendations master plan document draft : december 2011 next public meeting : february 2012 questions / comments / suggestions? oceanbeach@spur.org october 29,

61 Exhibit 3: Project Letters

62 Exhibit 3: Project Letters