March1,2018 MEMORANDUM. President Michael K. Young President, Texas A&M University. CBE Recommendation: Spirit Plaza

Transcription

1 COUNCL FOR THE BULT ENVRONMENT Co-Chairs: Dr. Carol A. Fierke, Provost and Executive Vice President Dr. Jerry R. Strawser, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March1,2018 MEMORANDUM TO: SUBJECT: President Michael K. Young President, Texas A&M University CBE Recommendation: Spirit Plaza The Council for the Built Environment (CBE) reviewed a request from the Class of '69 for project approval and conceptual design of Spirit Plaza which would transform the area between the YMCA building, Coke building, Military Walk, and Houston Street into a plaza that would honor the Silver Taps and Muster traditions. This project was previously routed through the CBE Track B process under the name Traditions Plaza and was not approved with the recommendation to consider a more minimal design. Since that time, Class of '69 representatives have met with university representatives and have revised their conceptual design based on those conversations. The request as well as the sub-council's report are attached. The Design Review sub-council (DRsc) voted to recommend approval of the conceptual design of the Spirit Plaza with the following caveats: Approval is provided for the conceptual design for the plaza to honor Silver Taps and Muster traditions, however, further simplification of plaza elements is still necessary. Concern that some of the design elements as shown are not appropriate or in alignment with the 2017 Campus Master Plan. As intent of the plaza is to honor Silver Taps and Muster traditions and relocate the existing sculptures for each from the Academic Plaza, request re-evaluation of necessity to include the Core Values as these are noted elsewhere in multiple locations around the campus built environment. Concern with overuse of emblems and iconography on the pedestals and request simplification. Note that any use of the TAMU seal should be eliminated, and care should be taken to ensure that this plaza does not deemphasize the presidential seal on Military Walk. Logos and reference to individual student groups should be eliminated, as the plaza should appeal to the student body as a whole. Concern with extensive use of text as the primary method of storytelling, as it gives the feel of a museum rather than a plaza. Request reconsideration to translate the narrative into a physical form that's not so literal. Any use of text is subject to review and approval by the appropriate TAMU entities and policies, such as Marketing and Communications and the Texas A&M Campus Plaque Policy. This policy can be found at Naming of landscape areas is outside of DRsc scope. Plaza name must be approved by appropriate T AMU entities. Jack K. Williams Administration Building, Suite TAMU College Station, TX USA Tel Fax

2 March 1, 2018 CBE Recommendation: Spirit Plaza Page2 Re-evaluation of height and design ofthe seat walls is necessary as they appear inconsistent with campus standards. Height of display walls and bronze sculptures should be consistent. Visually, all design elements should not be greater than 42". The historical visual corridor as noted within the 2017 Campus Master Plan needs to be maintained. Concern with landscape concept as currently proposed, as it removes ground level vegetation and proposes a large homogenous path of pavers which may not complement the banded paver walk as seen in the Houston Street updates. Request redesign that will complement the nearby streetscapes and incorporate more vegetation while allowing for a 26' wide fire lane. Professional design services should be engaged to complete the design. Please ensure the T AMU procurement requirements are followed. Further design details should be presented to the DRsc at 100% Schematic Design and 100% Design Development. Any further reviews should include a comprehensive 3D rendering of the space and clarification of materials. Facilities Utilization and Planning sub-council (FUPsc) recommends approval of the Spirit Plaza. The Maintenance sub-council (Msc) recommends approval of the Sprit Plaza with the following caveat: A maintenance endowment fund should be established to provide for future maintenance of the plaza. The Technical Review sub-council (TRsc) recommends approval of the Sprit Plaza with the following caveats: Facilities Services: The project team should coordinate with SSC Grounds Management for landscaping and irrigation concerns. Construction must be coordinated with the Student Services Building to mitigate the disruption of the high traffic area. Transportation Services: Construction must be coordinated with the MSC Streets and Sidewalk mprovement projects. Utilities & Energy Services: t is unclear what exact changes will be made to the existing finished grade in the area. T AMU UES recently upgraded the storm water system in this area and any modifications to area paving, drainage, or storm flow need to be approved by T AMU UES Technical Services prior to design completion and construction. Contact Bob Henry, bobhenry@tamu.edu. Any existing utility system access points need to be maintained andor adjusted to the new finished grade. Any excavation or modification to the area will need to follow the policy for digging on campus. f any utility systems will need to be modified or added to as part of the project, the design team will need to follow the applicable TAMU Design Standards and receive acceptance from UES prior to any installation. Although all sub-councils have recommended conceptual approval of the project, the request was reviewed for action by the CBE as the project proposes creation of a new landscape plaza in a prominent campus location.

3 March, 2018 CBE Recommendation: Spirit Plaza Page 3 The CBE voted to recommend, with noted caveats, the President's approval of the concept for the Spirit Plaza. The details of the project, as presented, is not recommended for approval until concerns are addressed. Date Provost and Executive Vice President Co-Chair, Council for the Built Environment )52~@3= 03~:~ Executive Vice President & Chief financial Officer Co-Chair, Council for the Built Environment Approved: President Date Attachment cc: Sub-Council Chairs, Council for the Built Environment Freddie Wong, Class of'69 Spirit Plaza Committee

4 DVSON OF FNANCE AND OPERATONS OFFCE OF THE UNVERSTY ARCHTECT Lilia Gonzales University Architect COUNCL FOR THE BULT ENVRONMENT TRACK B REPORT Project Name: ssue Date: Spirit Plaza (formerly called Traditions Plaza) Project Requestor: ndividualcollege or DivisionDepartment or Unit Date Request Received: Freddie Wong, Class of 69 through Dr. Daniel Pugh, Division of Student Affairs CBE Sub-Councils Reviewed (reports attached): X DRsc X TRsc X FUPsc X Msc Other Report copies provided to: CBE Co-Chairs, CBE Coordinator, CBE Sub-Council Chairs Daniel Pugh Status: Not Approved Approved Approved with Caveats Caveats: For full details see the attached Sub-Council Reports X DRsc X TRsc FUPsc X Msc Summary of Caveats: Design Review sub-council recommend approval with caveats Approval is provided for the conceptual design for the plaza to honor Silver Taps and Muster traditions, however, further simplification of plaza elements is still necessary. Concern that some of the design elements as shown are not appropriate or in alignment with the 2017 Campus Master Plan. As intent of the plaza is to honor Silver Taps and Muster traditions and relocate the existing sculptures for each from the Academic Plaza, request re-evaluation of necessity to include the Core Values as these are noted elsewhere in multiple locations around the campus built environment. Concern with overuse of emblems and iconography on the pedestals and request simplification. Note that any use of the TAMU seal should be eliminated, and care should be taken to ensure that this plaza does not deemphasize the presidential seal on Military Walk. Logos and reference to individual student groups should be eliminated, as the plaza should appeal to the student body as a whole. Concern with extensive use of text as the primary method of storytelling, as it gives the feel of a museum rather than a plaza. Request reconsideration to translate the narrative into a physical form that s not so literal. Any use of text is subject to review and approval by the appropriate TAMU entities and policies, such as Marketing and Communications and the Texas A&M Campus Plaque Policy. This policy can be found at Naming of landscape areas is outside of DRsc scope. Plaza name must be approved by appropriate TAMU entities. Re-evaluation of height and design of the seat walls is necessary as they appear inconsistent with campus standards. Height of display walls and bronze sculptures should be consistent. Visually, all design elements should not be greater than 42. The historical visual corridor as noted within the 2017 Campus Master Plan needs to be maintained. Concern with landscape concept as currently proposed, as it removes ground level vegetation and proposes a large homogenous path of pavers which may not complement the banded paver walk as seen in the Houston Street updates. Request redesign that will complement the nearby streetscapes and incorporate more vegetation while allowing for a 26 wide fire lane. Professional design services should be engaged to complete the design. Please ensure the TAMU procurement requirements are followed. General Services Complex, Suite TAMU College Station, TX Tel lilia.gonzales@tamu.edu

5 DVSON OF FNANCE AND OPERATONS OFFCE OF THE UNVERSTY ARCHTECT Lilia Gonzales University Architect Further design details should be presented to the DRsc at 100% Schematic Design and 100% Design Development. Any further reviews should include a comprehensive 3D rendering of the space and clarification of materials. Maintenance sub-council recommend approval with caveats A maintenance endowment fund should be established to provide for future maintenance of the plaza. Technical Review sub-council recommend approval with caveats Facilities Services: The project team should coordinate with SSC Grounds Management for landscaping and irrigation concerns. Construction must be coordinated with the Student Services Building to mitigate the disruption of the high traffic area. Transportation Services: Construction must be coordinated with the MSC Streets and Sidewalk mprovement projects. Utilities & Energy Services: Looks forward to working closely with the project and design team to ensure that all campus requirements are met and the project is successful. t is unclear what exact changes will be made to the existing finished grade in the area. TAMU UES recently upgraded the storm water system in this area and any modifications to area paving, drainage, or storm flow need to be approved by TAMU UES Technical Services prior to design completion and construction. Contact Bob Henry, bobhenry@tamu.edu. Any existing utility system access points need to be maintained andor adjusted to the new finished grade. Any excavation or modification to the area will need to follow the policy for digging on campus. f any utility systems will need to be modified or added to as part of the project, the design team will need to follow the applicable TAMU Design Standards and receive acceptance from UES prior to any installation. Facilities Utilization and Planning sub-council recommend approval Comments from the University Architect: Although all sub-councils have recommended conceptual approval of the project, am recommending this be reviewed for action by the Council for the Built Environment as the project proposes creation of a new landscape plaza in a prominent campus location. General Services Complex, Suite TAMU College Station, TX Tel lilia.gonzales@tamu.edu

6 COUNCL FOR THE BULT ENVRONMENT DESGN REVEW SUB-COUNCL DESGN REVEW SUB-COUNCL REPORT From: Ms. Lilia Gonzales Design Review Sub-Council Chair Date: January 25, 2018 Subject: Spirit Plaza Representatives from the Class of 69 presented for project approval and conceptual design the Spirit Plaza request which would transform the area between the YMCA building, Coke building, Military Walk, and Houston Street into a plaza that would honor the Silver Taps and Muster traditions. This project was previously routed through the CBE Track B process under the name Traditions Plaza and was not approved with the recommendation to consider a more minimal design. Since that time, Class of 69 representatives have met with university representatives and have revised their conceptual design based on those conversations. The proposed conceptual design features a plaza area containing two granite display wall panels (one on each side) with text to describe the Silver Taps and Muster traditions. The Century Tree display as proposed in the original project request has been eliminated. The display walls would be approximately 42 inches in height and 8 feet in length. The proposed panel size is now much smaller than what was in the original request, which is in alignment with the Campus Master Plan guidelines for keeping an open space and maintaining view corridors. This also matches the height of the existing historical markers along Military Walk. The existing Silver Taps and Muster bronze sculptures would be relocated to this area and placed on a pedestal adjacent to the corresponding display panel. Campus standard benches would be located on each side. The display wallsplinths will be a granite from the same quarry as those on Military Walk. While the Military Walk displays use vinyl wrapped plaques, the Spirit Plaza displays are proposed to be an inlaid black granite. Cast stone cap and brick wrapped seat walls (consistent with campus standard style) will be added to line the existing flower beds on each end of the plaza. A pedestal or end cap is proposed to be added to the four corners on the plaza entrances. The seat walls are around 18 inches high. t is proposed to add bas-reliefs of iconic TAMU figures or symbols to the face of the pedestals, such as the Aggie Ring Crest or Muster Committee logo. Spirit Plaza is proposed to be inscribed on top of these pedestals. This design is still conceptual. A bronze replica of the Donald Coward letter is proposed to be added on a separate granite display near the Silver Taps display panel. The front page of the letter and envelope would be shown on the top of the display, and the remaining pages would be engraved on the vertical face below along with his original signature. Significance of the letter: Donald Coward was a freshman in 1968 and was so moved after attending his first Silver Taps ceremony that he wrote a powerful letter to his parents that evening. Three weeks later he was tragically killed in a car accident. Since 2000, this letter has been read to incoming freshmen at Fish Camp to help explain the Silver Taps and Muster traditions. t was noted that the Class of 72 (Donald Coward s class) wishes to participate in funding this part of the project.

7 COUNCL FOR THE BULT ENVRONMENT DESGN REVEW SUB-COUNCL The entire plaza surface is proposed to be comprised of brick pavers in TAMU s standard tan color. A compass is proposed to be inlaid in the center of the plaza and will be made from a combination of different colored stones similar to the university seal on Military Walk (LED lights in original proposal were eliminated). The width of the plaza will support fire truck access. Four trees will be added on the YMCA side of the plaza. Plant materials will be native, using the same palette as what you already see at Military Walk. This project is fully funded including an endowment for future maintenance needs. The Class of 69 desires to have construction completed by Summer 2018, if possible, to align with its 50 th class year reunioncelebration during the academic year. DRsc members expressed agreement with the concept to make this area into a plaza to honor the Silver Taps and Muster traditions and create a home for the existing statues, but that the final design needs to complement existing design elements of Military Walk and still provide an uninterrupted visual axis to the Academic Building. This proposed plaza is on a major axis of the campus and in one of TAMU s most important view corridors. n addition, this plaza was noted in the 2017 Campus Master Plan as a historical outdoor space and view corridor. Given the significance of the area, it is important that the landscape design approach for this area be done in a thoughtful way. Recommendation DRsc members voted to recommend approval of the conceptual design of the Spirit Plaza with the following caveats: Approval is provided for the conceptual design for the plaza to honor Silver Taps and Muster traditions, however, further simplification of plaza elements is still necessary. Concern that some of the design elements as shown are not appropriate or in alignment with the 2017 Campus Master Plan. As intent of the plaza is to honor Silver Taps and Muster traditions and relocate the existing sculptures for each from the Academic Plaza, request re-evaluation of necessity to include the Core Values as these are noted elsewhere in multiple locations around the campus built environment. Concern with overuse of emblems and iconography on the pedestals and request simplification. Note that any use of the TAMU seal should be eliminated, and care should be taken to ensure that this plaza does not deemphasize the presidential seal on Military Walk. Logos and reference to individual student groups should be eliminated, as the plaza should appeal to the student body as a whole. Concern with extensive use of text as the primary method of storytelling, as it gives the feel of a museum rather than a plaza. Request reconsideration to translate the narrative into a physical form that s not so literal. Any use of text is subject to review and approval by the appropriate TAMU entities and policies, such as Marketing and Communications and the Texas A&M Campus Plaque Policy. This policy can be found at Naming of landscape areas is outside of DRsc scope. Plaza name must be approved by appropriate TAMU entities. Re-evaluation of height and design of the seat walls is necessary as they appear inconsistent with campus standards.

8 COUNCL FOR THE BULT ENVRONMENT DESGN REVEW SUB-COUNCL Height of display walls and bronze sculptures should be consistent. Visually, all design elements should not be greater than 42. The historical visual corridor as noted within the 2017 Campus Master Plan needs to be maintained. Concern with landscape concept as currently proposed, as it removes ground level vegetation and proposes a large homogenous path of pavers which may not complement the banded paver walk as seen in the Houston Street updates. Request redesign that will complement the nearby streetscapes and incorporate more vegetation while allowing for a 26 wide fire lane. Professional design services should be engaged to complete the design. Please ensure the TAMU procurement requirements are followed. Further design details should be presented to the DRsc at 100% Schematic Design and 100% Design Development. Any further reviews should include a comprehensive 3D rendering of the space and clarification of materials. cc: DRsc Members

9 DVSON OF STUDENT AFFARS Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs MEMORANDUM TO: Lilia Gonzales University Architect FROM: ub~councll DATE: December 1, 2017 SUBJECT: CBE TRsc Recommendation: Request for Spirit Plaza The CBE's Technical Review Sub~council reviewed the revised proposal for the request for building Spirit Plaza (formally called Traditions Plaza). The revisions include changes to conform to the 2017 Campus Master plan, changing the name from Traditions Plaza to Sprit Plaza, lowering the profile of all the displays and adding soft~scapes. Recommendation The Technical Review Sub-council supports the proposed request for Spirit Plaza and recommends approval, provided the following issuesconcerns are addressed and funded. FCORGS: Facility Services: The project team should coordinate with Grounds Management for landscaping and irrigation concerns. Recommend support with the caveat that the construction must be coordinated with the Student Services Building to mitigate the disruption of the high traffic area. Transportation Services: There will need to be coordination between this project and the MSC streets and sidewalk improvement projects. Utilities: TAMU UES looks forward to working closely with the project and design team to ensure that all campus requirements are met and that the project is successful. t is unclear what exact changes will be made to the existing finished grade in the area. TAMU UES recently upgraded the storm water system in this area and any modifications to area paving, drainage, 117 Koldus Student Services Building 1256 TAMU College Station, TX Tel Fax irs. tam u.ed u

10 or storm flow need to be approved by TAMU UES Technical Services prior to design completion and construction. Henry, Robert H bobhenrv@tamu.edu. Any existing utility system access points need to maintained and or adjusted to new finished grade. Any excavation or modification to the area will need to follow the policy for digging on campus - f any utility systems will need to be modified or added to as part of the project the project design team will need to follow the applicable TAMU Design Standards- and receive acceptance from UES prior to any installation. Capital Financial Planning, CS. Procurement. EH&S. Telecommunications. University Police and Energy Services. Student Affairs: No concerns. Xc: CBE Technical Review Sub-council CBE Support Staff

11 Council for the Built Environment Facilities Utilization and Planning Sub-Council December 5, 2017 MEMORANDUM To: Dr. Carol A. Fierke Provost & Executive Vice President Co-Chair, Council for the Built Environment Dr. Jerry Strawser Executive VP for Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer Co-Chair, Council for the Built Environment From: Subject: Dr. J. Martin Scholtz Executive Associate Vice President for Research Chair, CBE-Facilities Utilization and Planning Sub-Council Request for Building the Spirit Plaza (formerly called Traditions Plaza) SCOPE The Council for the Built Environment s (CBE) Facilities Utilization and Planning subcouncil (FUPsc) considered the request by the Class of 69 Spirit Plaza Committee, to construct a new Spirit Plaza located on the Texas A&M University campus in the area bounded by the YMCA Building, Coke Building, Military Walk and Houston Street. The project is a gift from the class in honor of the 50 th reunion of their class planned for April 21, This is a revised plan for the project that is now in alignment with the Master Plan. The changes provide for a lower profile design to the exhibits with a more open viewmalllike feel. They are also maintaining space necessary for the fire lane and have eliminated the need for electrical by using different colored stones for the compass rather than LEDs. RECOMMENDATON The majority of FUPsc recommends that the CBE support the construction of Spirit Plaza. We are pleased to offer this recommendation and welcome further inquiries related to this analysis. CC: CBE-FUPsc members

12 COUNCL FOR THE BULT ENVRONMENT MANTENANCE SUB-COUNCL MANTENANCE SUB-COUNCL REPORT From: Ralph R. Davila ~ ~ Maintenance Sub-Council Chair Date: December 3, 2017 Re: Student Affairs- Building Spirit Plaza (formerly called Traditions Plaza) Rev. The Maintenance Sub-Council (Msc) reviewed a revised request by Student Affairs for Building Spirit Plaza (formerly cajied Traditions Plaza). The Msc council agreed that this project was something that would benefit the Aggie Experience for many years. Discussion on maintenance of the site and it was recommended a maintenance endowment fund would need to be established to maintain the items described in the request. There were no other major issues or concerns. Recommendation The CBE Msc voted to recommend approval of the Traditions Plaza proposal with the noted caveat above. Please contact me with any questions. Cc: Msc Members Jr. "'V 11 1alr' P.1 1 i( r.,l.. ',, 1 'i AMU Collegf! Ste1tiun, TX T.:1 i Sht

13 November 9, 2017 To: Dr. Carol A. Fierke, Provost and Executive VP Co-Chair, Council for the Built Environment Dr. Jerry R. Strawser, Vice President for Finance and Administration Co-Chair, Council for the Built Environment Through: Dr. Daniel J. Pugh, Jr., Vice President for Student Ser ce~ From: Freddie Wong on behalf of Class of '69 Spirit Plaza Committee Committee members: Bill Zemanek, Bill Maddox, Bob Lynch and Tom Woodbury Subject: Rev. 1 Request for Building the Spirit Plaza (formerly called Traditions Plaza) Background n early June 2017, our committee submitted to the Council of Built Environment, CBE, a proposal of a legacy project from our class to the university in honor of our soth reunion planned for April 21, The title for the project was Traditions Plaza. n late July, 2017 we received a response Lilia Gonzales, the university architect, advising us that the project was approved to proceed, but with substantial changes to our original proposed design. The primary concern of the CBE subcouncils was that the proposed design does not conform with the 2017 Campus

14 Master plan to provide a more open viewmall like feel. Also we did not provide any soft-scape in the original proposal. At the suggestion of Ms. Gonzales, in the late afternoon of August 9, our committee met with her and Dr. Danny Pugh, our project sponsor, at the proposed location for the project. Also present on this occasion was a representative of Traditions Council. During that site meeting, we agreed to substantially change our design by lowering the profile of all our displays. Also we were advised that Traditions Plaza is a space at the entrance to the Bonfire Memorial and we needed to suggest a different name. Working with the Traditions Council in consultation with Muster Committee, we accepted one of the options suggested by the Traditions Council to name our project as Spirit Plaza. Proposal The diagram below represents the revised proposed design for the Spirit Plaza. Some of the major changes are outlined below: The display walls height before were in the range of 6'. The proposed design is now 42". RECEVED ]-616 NOV Vice President for Finance and Administration

15 ' \ u..,,.;ot!ll cr,r t '9t r.&:t S;~ ).!i:l..,.l 'ltl)>l s.:.. 1V..M. '-. \..._ ; S.1 W f+~ T f ll.- -,... -~ ' \ The wall lengths were 16' long before and they are now 8' long, see below:.<.,) L

16 And because the heights of the displays are lowered, and therefore closer to the viewer, we are able to use smaller font sizes and still be very legible. The compass in the middle of the plaza will be made of a combination different colored stones similar to the university seal on Military Walk adjacent to the proposed site. The Century Tree display is eliminated. We have added 4 concrete corner pedestals arrangements next to the existing flower beds at both entrances into plaza, see diagram below. There are two sides of each pedestal visible to visitors to the plaza. Our plan is to put iconic Aggie figures on these surfaces. Some examples we have in mind are Aggie Ring Crest, Muster Committee symbol to be downloaded from their home page, other iconic figures which are readi ly recognizable by Aggies of all ages. We also plan in inscribing "Spirit Plaza" on the top of these pedestals, pending approval of the use of the name.. 0 "_J The Donald Coward letter will be displayed as depicted in the drawing below:

17 ... By putting the benches on the side of the plaza, we make sure the space in the middle is wider than 27' to accommodate a fire truck. Also we have not received a response to our request for instruction on how to get a statue approved on campus in case the Donald Coward letter is deemed a "statue" rather than a wall s=display like the rest of our proposed work; and the authority to approval for naming the plaza as ((Spirit Plaza". Signature: Freddie Wong Class of '69 Project Planning Team Signature: Larry Lippke Class of '69 Agent

18 nitial Proposed Design Spirit Plaza Class of 69

19 Spirit Plaza Class of " \ \ \. ~ 3: ) j ~==::::::::====~1 ClOr n~;~ 1 Plot Plan of nitial Proposed Design

20 Spirit Plaza Class of 69 Actions after First Round Review Met at proposed job site with L. Gonzales, D. Pugh, T. Reber, Trad. Council VP Re-convened design team to lower profile of proposed displays Worked with Traditions Council, Muster Committee, Tim Power on proposed display text

21 Plot Plan of Revised Proposed Design Spirit Plaza Class of 69

22 Proposed Revised Panel Design Spirit Plaza Class of 69

23 Proposed 4 Corner Pedestals Spirit Plaza Class of 69

24 Proposed Donald Coward Letter Display Spirit Plaza Class of 69

25 VEW OF SLVER TAPS WALL AND ENTRY PEDESTAL LOOKNG TOWARDS THE COKE BULDNG VEW OF SLVER TAPS WALL AND ENTRY PEDESTAL LOOKNG TOWARDS THE ACADEt.liC BULDNG DONALD COWARD LETTER DSPLAY Wm-1 BENCHES

26 E j -; ~ j 1:1 i ::! l!....~ g -Ei ~ 0 :; "' a ~...u =.! ~ ~ YMCA BU LD NG!l : :!! ~ UMTS OF CONSTRUCTON ""' \ \ 0 EXSTNG PAVER SDEWALK TO REMAN UND STURB(D \ EXSTNG PAVER SOEWAU<: (MUTA.RY WALJ( ). TO RE MAN UNDSTURBED <. ~ ~ ll.)e--t ~ ) ~ -+- ~ ~ ;::J ~ z 0 f-vl ::J 0 ' _. ' ' 01.) :5 ~t':l o_ Cl'.:l ~ ::;; w 0 -u ~ ~ 0 u s ~~.2 N ) '.9 11.) <J: \ ~ Q ~~ ~ri'j f-vl E <{ ~~ u <{ 'FEAT\JRE DSPLAY [ 2] 42" HGH GRANTE MONUt.ENT; SMLAR TO MUTARY W<J.J( \ ,,,' ""' \ \ \ \ '--- "'";T"' LANDSCAPE BED. \,!,',, ""'~ ~ EXSTNG LANDSCAPE BED. ""' \ ""' _J <( "-..._ L-1 -- ~ COKE BU LDNG ~ <( --~ DATE: JOB NO: DRAWN BY: MAT CHECKED: _J ~ ""' \ SHEET 0 \ \ 5 10 SCALE 1" =10'-0" 20