PROVINCIE NOORD-HOLLAND PAKHUIS DE ZWIJGER AMSTERDAM 27TH NOVEMBER MAAK PLAATS! WERKEN AAN KNOOPPUNTONTWIKKELING

Transcription

1 PROVINCIE NOORD-HOLLAND PAKHUIS DE ZWIJGER AMSTERDAM 27TH NOVEMBER MAAK PLAATS! WERKEN AAN KNOOPPUNTONTWIKKELING THE REGIONAL METRO SYSTEM (RMS) OF NAPLES: DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPACTS prof. Ennio Cascetta University of Naples Federico II DICEA - Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering ennio.cascetta@unina.it OUTLINE 1. THE CONTEXT 2. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS 3. THE IMPLEMENTATION 4. THE IMPACTS 1

2 1 THE CONTEXT OUTLINE 1. THE CONTEXT POPULATION AND INHABITANTS DENSITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSABILITIES ON MOBILITY PLANNING 2. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS 3. THE IMPLEMENTATION 4. THE IMPACTS 2

3 THE CONTEXT Naples Vesuvius Pompei Ischia Sorrento Amalfi Capri THE CONTEXT POPULATION AND INHABITANTS DENSITY Provinces Inhabitants Inhabitants density [inh/ sqkm] Caserta Benevento Napoli Avellino Salerno Campania Region

4 THE CONTEXT LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSABILITIES ON MOBILITY PLANNING LR.3/2002 Campania Region Law - Reform of Local Public Transportation and Mobility Systems THREE LAYERS SYSTEM REGION Overall coordination of public system. Programming and contracting on: a)regional and local rail infrastructures and services; b)interregional or interprovincial (that connect three or more Provinces) bus and tram infrastructures and services; c) maritime infrastructures and services PROVINCES Programming and contracting on: a)urban and extraurban bus and tram infrastructure and services; b)multimodal exchange nodes; c)interprovincial (that connect two Provinces) bus and tram infrastructure and services; d)cable infrastructures and services CAPITALS OF PROVINCES Programming and contracting on: a)urban bus and tram infrastructures and services; b)urban rail and metro infrastructures and services; c) multimodal exchange nodes; d)cable infrastructure and services within the municipality territory. 2 THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS 4

5 OUTLINE 1. THE CONTEXT 2. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS THE DECISION PROCESS MILESTONES THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROCESS SUCCESS FACTOR 3. THE IMPLEMENTATION 4. THE IMPACTS THE DECISION PROCESS MILESTONES beginning of the planning process Urban Transport Plan of Naples Stations Plan Feasibility study for the SMR (Regional Metro System) Inserting the SMR in 2001 CIPE 121 (Framework Law) 2001 Approval of the Master Plan - PRG of Naples 2002 Approval by the regional government of the SMR project (DGR 1282) From 2001 to 2010, ten yearly budget allocation acts: Implementation Plan of the General Programme of Infrastructures 2006 Resolution No Approval of the guidelines for the design and construction of stations of the Regional Metro System Large EU projects: 2007 (approved), SMR - Line 1: Dante - Garibaldi 2012 (for approval), SMR - Line 6: Mergellina - City Hall 5

6 THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROCESS THE PROCESS IS BASED ON THREE LEGS : Dynamic and pragmatic decision-making process Decision-makers choose alternatives which satisfy main objectives and constraints, learning from previous choices by successive approximations, taking into account the feedbacks from decision-makers and stakeholders (Public Engagement). Public Engagement Identification and incorporation of stakeholders concerns, needs and values in the transport decision-making process. transparent decision-making process with greater input from stakeholders and their support of the decisions (larger coalitions). Quantitative methods: Quantitative analysis of currect conditions. Simulation and assessment of alternative projects/ solutions. THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROCESS INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS Steering Committee participation in meetings Regional Alderman coordination for feasibility studies and projects direction and management of stakeholders relationship public presentations, media campaigns Institutional stakeholders Other stakeholders quality assessment for studies and projects Regional Technical structure (ACAM) executive projects, contract management and construction supervision public presentations, media campaigns Railway companies 6

7 Institutions and Authorities European Union National government and authorities National parliament THE STRUCTURE OF THE PROCESS Users Direct users (passengers) Indirect users (passengers) Transport users associations INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS Transport operators Transport operators Professionals and experts Business and Unions National and local industry associations National and local trade unions Local communities Local interest groups (e.g. borough associations) Environmental associations Media TV station Radio station Retailers associations Citizens Newspapers Regional governments and Authorities Regional transport authority Industry in public works Industry in vehicles production Visitors Local authorities (Provinces and Municipalities) Political parties and single members Industry in technology production SUCCESS FACTORS CONTEXT Financial Joint, synergic use of different funds: European, national and regional (European funds for Objective 1 regions and national investment programs in infrastructure) Legal Devolution of regulatory competences on local and regional rail services from central to regional government in 2001 Ad hoc normative tools, approved at the regional and municipal levels Technical The presence of an extensive existing rail network, developed since Priority to the completion and/or upgrading of the unfinished projects started in previous decade; explanation of the high cost benefit ratios. The strong interdisciplinary approach to the project, involving planners, engineers, architects, urban designers. Simultaneous planning and construction of HSR and regional lines Strong process coordination capabilities (Regional Mobility Agency and a new holding Company for regional railways). 7

8 SUCCESS FACTORS DECISION MAKING APPROACH Strong vision: strong public transportation system centered around railways Stations with high symbolic value and rehabilitation of surrounding Delivery of visible results early in the process to build enthusiasm and expectations High level of political commitment at the local level Long-term stability of the supporting local institutions from 1994 to 2010 Coalition building and expectations from the citizenship high number of open options compatible with the need to implement actual decisions To Decide from latin: de-coedere to cut out has an opportunity cost Dynamic decision-making Credible process coordination 3 THE IMPLEMENTATION 8

9 OUTLINE 1. THE CONTEXT 2. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS 3. THE IMPLEMENTATION INFRASTRUCTURES ARCHEOLOGY URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS SERVICES ROLLING STOCK PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 4. THE IMPACTS INFRASTRUCTURES LINES AND STATIONS REGIONAL METRO SYSTEM Year 2000 Completed Construction Design Total Railways (km) (14%) Station (n.) (30%) NAPLES METRO SYSTEM Year 2000 Completed Construction Design Total Railways (km) (90%) Station (n.) (132%) Completed Ongoing Programmed M M M 9

10 INFRASTRUCTURES LINES AND STATIONS INFRASTRUCTURES LINES AND STATIONS completed in progress project 10

11 ARCHEOLOGY ARCHEOLOGY 11

12 ARCHEOLOGY Integrated in the new stations Museo Station Piazza Nicola Amore station Museo Station THE ART METRO PERINO&VELE A subway è chiù sicura, 2001 Salvator Rosa Station JOSEPH KOSUTH Queste cose visibili (Napoli, a Ferruccio Incutti), 2001 Dante Station 12

13 THE ART METRO MICHELANGELO PISTOLETTO Intermediterraneo, 2001 Dante Station MARIO MERZ no title, 2003 installation, 2005 Vanvitelli Station THE ART METRO KARIM RASHID Synapsi, 2010 Università Station WILLIAM KENTRIDGE Naples Procession, 2012 Toledo Station 13

14 URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS STATION RENAISSANCE IN NAPOLI URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS SALVATOR ROSA STATION (1956) 14

15 URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS SALVATOR ROSA STATION (DURING THE TRANSFORMATION) URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS SALVATOR ROSA STATION (AFTER) PROJECT BY ATELIER MENDINI 15

16 URBAN REHABILITATION S. Rosa (Atelier OF Mendini) STATION AREAS SALVATOR ROSA STATION (AFTER) BY ATELIER MENDINI URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS DANTE STATION (BEFORE) 16

17 URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS DANTE STATION PROJECT BY GAE AULENTI URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS TOLEDO STATION (VIA DIAZ, BEFORE) 17

18 URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS TOLEDO STATION (VIA DIAZ, AFTER) PROJECT BY OSCAR TUSQUET BLANCA URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS TOLEDO STATION William Kentrige Bob Wilson 18

19 URBAN REHABILITATION OF STATION AREAS TOLEDO STATION PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTION METROPOLIS EXHIBITION Naples ( December 2006 and September 2007) Venice (September 2006) Bruxelles (June 2007) 19

20 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTION ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS Opening Museo Station- Archeological Museum Passage Opening Dante Station PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COMMUNICATION AND PROMOTION BOOKLET AND PUBLICATIONS Publications Booklet for high school students «Public transport for a Sustainable Mobility: problems and solution» 20

21 4 THE IMPACTS OUTLINE 1. THE CONTEXT 2. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS 3. THE IMPLEMENTATION 4. THE IMPACTS MOBILITY IMPACTS 21

22 MOBILITY IMPACTS Pax/year on the regional railways Δ( ) :+38% -110 ktep/year; t/year CO2 reduction 4% of emission Pax/yr on the Naples rail Network Δ( ) :+78% Transit modal share Naples: 43% (+11% w.r.t. 1996) Average large Italian cities : 29% Δ( ) Car/p.c. Naples : -6%; Italy +6% Source: ACaM Study center Thank you for your attention 22