INDEX TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #7/10. Friday, September 10, 2010

Transcription

1 INDEX TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING #7/10 Friday, September 10, 2010 MINUTES Minutes of Meeting #6/10, held on August 6, HEARING REPORT Ontario Khalsa Darbar Inc., 7080 Dixie Road, City of Mississauga 374 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed Thornhill Ravines Development Corporation 382 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed E. Manson Investments Limited and Zureit Holdings Limited 385 GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project 388 REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND West side of Weston Road, north of Highway No. 401, City of Toronto 392 TOWN OF CALEDON Request for a permanent easement for a stormwater management facility and purchase of property located north of Mayfield Road and east of Highway 10, Town of Caledon and City of Brampton, Region of Peel 395 CITY OF TORONTO Conveyance of Land for Beechgrove Drive, south of Lawrence Avenue East, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed 399 CITY OF TORONTO Conveyance of Land for the Construction of a Cul-de-sac as Part of the Partial Closure of Kirkhams Road, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River Watershed 402

2 HYDROLOGIC STUDY OF IMPACTS OF FLOOD FLOWS AND MITIGATION Future Development in the Humber River Watershed 405 EAST DON TRAIL - ASPHALT PAVING Tender RSD # APPOINTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT OFFICER Suzanne Bevan 409 ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 10 Plymbridge Road Davies Crescent Curtis Crescent East Drive Thompson Avenue Reidmount Avenue Baby Point Road Ontario Inc Jane Street Ferris Road Ontario Limited Glen Albert Drive Berry Creek Drive Spring Valley Court th Concession Varsity Road Madras Avenue Elmwood Avenue Nattress Street Ellis Avenue Humbervale Boulevard Proctor Avenue True Davidson Drive Ontario Inc. and Bikramjeet Rakhra Crimson Forest Drive Ontario Ltd Owen Boulevard Riverside Drive Old Humber Crescent Woodland Heights Crimson Forest Drive Mill Cove Trail Ridge Lane Rosedale Heights Drive Kingsbury Crescent Crimson Forest Drive Beckett Avenue th Concession 443

3 ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 Cont'd 29 Crimson Forest Drive Fenwood Heights York Valley Crescent Majesty Court Glenview Avenue Edgehill Road Green Valley Road Chaya Sara Gardens King Street Francesca Court Edinborough Court Oakfield Drive Beech Grove Sideroad Sideline #4, RR Millersgrove Drive Grandvista Crescent Main Street North Lake Road th Sideroad South Kingsway Bow Valley Drive Hampton Park Crescent th Side Road Highland Crescent Clarence Street East Drive 423 Amexon Holdings Inc., City of Toronto and Metrolinx 412 Apostolic Pentecostal Church 411 Bell Canada 427, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440 Belmont Properties (Weston) Inc. 419, 420 Brampton, City of 411 Carstone Financial Inc. 446 Cogeco Data Services LP 414 Enbridge Pipelines Inc. 432 Fernbrook Homes 431 Glorco Holdings Inc. 431 Hornepayne Investments Ltd. 454 Huntington Landowners Group 421 Hydro One Telecom 435 King, Township of 427 Markham, Town of 455 Mattamy (Clarkway) Limited 451 Maxim Group Building Restoration Inc. 426 Metroplitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No Molise Kleinburg Estates Inc. 422 MTS Allstream 433

4 ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 Cont'd Times Group Corporation 432 Toronto, City of 418, 428, 430 Parks Forestry and Recreation 429 Toronto Transit Commission 451 City of Toronto 417, 452, 453 Uxbridge, Township of 442 Vaughan, City of 420 York, Regional Municipality of 424, 425, 433, 434, 435, 437, 441, 442 YRSCC 1069: Terraces on the Green 423

5 MEETING OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE #7/10 September 10, 2010 The Executive Committee Meeting #7/10, was held in the Victoria Room, Black Creek Pioneer Village, on Friday, September 10, The Chair Gerri Lynn O'Connor, called the meeting to order at 9:40 a.m. PRESENT Maria Augimeri Gay Cowbourne Suzan Hall Jack Heath Ron Moeser Gerri Lynn O'Connor Anthony Perruzza Richard Whitehead ABSENT David Barrow Glenn De Baeremaeker Colleen Jordan Maja Prentice Vice Chair Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member Member RES.#B93/10 - Moved by: Seconded by: MINUTES Richard Whitehead Gay Cowbourne THAT the Minutes of Meeting #6/10, held on August 6, 2010, be approved. CARRIED 373

6 HEARINGS PURSUANT TO ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06 HEARING REPORT - ONTARIO KHALSA DARBAR INC., 7080 DIXIE ROAD, CITY OF MISSISSAUGA RES.#B94/10 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Gay Cowbourne THAT the committee sit as a Hearing Board. MEMBERS PRESENT FOR HEARING Maria Augimeri Gay Cowbourne Suzan Hall Jack Heath Ron Moeser Gerri Lynn O'Connor Richard Whitehead CARRIED Vice Chair Member Member Member Member Chair Member Following the roll call, a hearing was held re: Application #0465/10/MISS to develop within a Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek watershed to recognize the recent placement of 10,360 cubic metres of fill at the property municipally known as 7080 Dixie Road, in the City of Mississauga. The applicants propose to temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material originating on the site or elsewhere within a Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek Watershed Ontario Khalsa Darbar Inc., 7080 Dixie Road, City of Mississauga. The owners of 7080 Dixie Road have applied to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), under Ontario Regulation 166/06, to develop within a Regulated Area to recognize the unauthorized placement of approximately 10,360 cubic metres of fill. The works were completed without obtaining approval under Ontario Regulation 166/06. Staff do not support the application on the basis that it adversley impacts the control of flooding. A presentation was made by Mr. Mahadeo Singh, P.Eng., M P S Engineering Inc., representative for Ontario Khalsa Darbar Inc. A written staff report was submitted and a presentation made by Mr. Quentin Hanchard, Planner I, Planning and Development Division. The Hearing Board asked questions of staff and the applicant/representative. RES.#B95/10 Moved by: Seconded by: Suzan Hall Richard Whitehead 374

7 THAT the Hearing Board consider this matter in closed session. DECISION OF THE HEARING BOARD RES.#B96/10 CARRIED Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Richard Whitehead THAT Application #0465/10/MISS to develop within a Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek watershed to recognize the recent placement of 10,360 cubic metres of fill at the property municipally known as 7080 Dixie Road, in the City of Mississauga be refused as it adversely impacts the control of flooding. CARRIED RES.#B97/10 Moved by: Seconded by: Jack Heath Gay Cowbourne THAT the Hearing Board arise and Report from closed session. MOTION TO RECONVENE RES.#B98/10 CARRIED Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Gay Cowbourne THAT Executive Committee Meeting #7/10 reconvene. MOTION TO RATIFY RES.#B99/10 CARRIED Moved by: Seconded by: Maria Augimeri Richard Whitehead THAT the Executive Committee ratify the Decision of the Hearing Board that Application #0465/10/MISS to develop within a Regulated Area of the Etobicoke Creek watershed to recognize the recent placement of 10,360 cubic metres of fill at the property municipally known as 7080 Dixie Road, in the City of Mississauga be refused as it adversely impacts the control of flooding. CARRIED BACKGROUND This application has been submitted for approval of works after-the-fact. The applicant is presently seeking permission to retain the fill (approximately 10,360 cubic metres of fill) that has recently been placed on the subject property within the Regulatory Floodplain of Etobicoke Creek 375

8 TRCA Enforcement staff observed the filling on the subject property, adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek on October 13, TRCA Enforcement staff subsequently issued a notice of violation on October 16, 2009, as the required permits (pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06) had not been attained from TRCA. The owners were subsequently charged under the Conservation Authorities Act for the unlawful placement of fill without attaining a permit from TRCA, and legal proceedings in the form of charges before District Court commenced August 24, This matter is anticipated to be proceeding through the courts in the fall of Violation notices and charges under the Conservation Authorities Act have previously been issued on this property to the same owners as a result of previous filling activity and watercourse alterations in another section of the river corridor on the property. Following the enforcement notices, TRCA staff received a permit application and associated materials on January 14, 2010 to regularize the prior placement of approximately 10,360 cubic metres of fill on the site. As a result of the adverse impacts to the control of flooding (detailed further below) TRCA staff cannot support this permit application. In the case of the proposal for approval of works after-the-fact for 7080 Dixie Road, TRCA staff concludes that the control of flooding has been adversely affected. Before refusing permission, TRCA must hold a Hearing to which the applicant and other interested persons are a party (Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.27-28(12)). The applicants have requested such a hearing before the TRCA Hearing Board. PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is located on the west side of Dixie Road, north of Derry Road, and is traversed by the main West Branch of Etobicoke Creek. The subject property is surrounded by employment lands, just west of the Lester B. Pearson International Airport, in the City of Mississauga. The south portion of the property contains an existing temple facility and associated parking lot and recreational field. The north portions of the parking lot and temple are within TRCA's Regulated Area adjacent to the Etobicoke Creek valley corridor. The recreational field, located just north of the temple, is located entirely within the Regional Floodplain and is subject to flood depths of up to two metres. A TRCA permit was previously issued for an addition to the existing temple and an expansion to the parking lot in 1997 (TRCA Permit #C-97053). A TRCA permit was also issued in 2006 for an additional parking lot expansion as well as the removal of fill and slope stabilization works adjacent to the creek, to resolve a previous violation on the property (TRCA Permit #C-06078). TRCA JURISDICTION Pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06, a permit is required from TRCA prior to any development, if in the opinion of the Authority, the control of flooding, erosion, dynamic beaches or pollution or the conservation of land may be affected by the development. Development is defined as: i) the construction, reconstruction, erection or placing of a building or structure of any kind, ii) any change to a building or structure that would have the effect of altering the use or potential use of the building or structure, increasing the size of the building or structure or increasing the number of dwelling units in the building or structure, iii) site grading, 376

9 iv) the temporary or permanent placing, dumping or removal of any material, originating on the site or elsewhere. An Ontario Regulation 166/06 permit must be applied for and obtained before any grading or site alteration works can commence within portions of a property regulated by TRCA. In the case of 7080 Dixie Road, a permit under Ontario Regulation 166/06 would have been required prior to the site grading works and fill placement commencing within TRCA s Regulated Areas; this has been conveyed to the same proponent on several occasions through previous violation and permitting processes on the same property. TRCA staff review all permitting requirements in concert with our Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) policies (1994). VSCMP integrates TRCA's natural hazard management, public safety responsibilities and reaffirms its commitment to ecosystem planning at a watershed level. The VSCMP outlines policies for new development and modifications to existing properties within highly urbanized areas such as the area surrounding and including the subject property. THE PROPOSAL This permit application is to seek permission after-the-fact for the fill placed within a TRCA Regulated Area, and the Regulatory Floodplain, adjacent to Etobicoke Creek. According to the report submitted in support of this application, prepared by MPS Engineering Inc., dated January 2010, approximately 10,360 cubic metres of fill has been placed over an area of 12,140 square metres (for an average depth of 0.85 metres). The submitted report and application identify that the fill has been placed on an existing soccer field in order to create a level soccer field for the benefit of temple members. The fill placed on site is located within the Regional Storm floodplain. STAFF REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL Control of Flooding The submission does not meet the five tests under Ontario Regulation 166/06 as it negatively impacts the control of flooding. The report completed by MPS Engineering Inc., submitted with the application states that the fill placement has resulted in the direct loss of 8,640 cubic metres of floodplain storage during a Regional Storm event. TRCA staff has determined that this loss of flood storage is unacceptable and that the cumulative impacts to the available flood storage throughout the watershed, should this type of activity be allowed, would result in adverse changes to the function of the floodplain and its ability to convey flood waters. The loss of flood storage will result in an increase in peak flood flows and water levels. As noted above, the Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program is utilized by TRCA staff to guide the review of applications pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06. The VSCMP stresses in 'Principle No. 4' that valley and stream corridors are vulnerable to the incremental and cumulative impacts of land use change. As a result, the VSCMP does not permit large-scale filling within the floodplain, which results in significant incremental and cumulative losses to floodplain storage for the purposes of facilitating development. This proposal is inconsistent with the following policies of the VSCMP: 377

10 1. Section C) identifies that alterations of valley corridors through such activities as filling shall not be permitted to create additional useable area and/or accommodate development. The fill has been placed within the valley corridor and is contrary to policy C). 2. Section 4.1- New Development, of the VSCMP emphasizes the need to protect and rehabilitate valley and stream corridor landforms, features and functions while being sensitive to the development characteristics and needs of the Region as a whole and to the use of these important resources by the community. The placement of fill within the Regulatory Flood Plain of the Etobicoke Creek valley contributes to the cumulative storage loss of flood waters in the watershed. Granting permission to regularize the fill placed on site: i. may put additional properties upstream or downstream at risk of flooding during a Regional Storm event as a result of the cumulative impacts to floodplain storage; ii. would set a precedent that would make it difficult to refuse future applications of this nature. The cumulative impacts of such approvals would compromise the ability of TRCA staff to effectively manage flood risk on a watershed basis. Prohibiting development such as this that creates potential risk to life and property is further emphasized in Policy 4.1, which states that (T)he main thrust of the Authority s policies and procedures for undeveloped valley and stream corridors is to prevent new development that would introduce risk to life and property associated with flooding, erosion and slope stability The fill placed on the subject property is considered development and introduces potential flooding risk to life and property within the Etobicoke Creek watershed and is not consistent with Section 4.1 of the VSCMP. 3. Policy E. of the VSCMP recognizes the need for provisions dealing with ancillary structures and property improvements, such as minor filling. Section E.1) states that minor alterations to grade/landscaping, if located within the Regulatory Flood Plain, may be permitted so long as the location and design of the alterations do not result in unacceptable impacts to flood storage and conveyance. As previously stated, the filling on this site is not minor, and it is the opinion of TRCA Water Resources Engineering staff that the fill placed in the Regulatory Flood Plain has resulted in an unacceptable loss of flood storage and is inconsistent with this policy. 4. The unacceptable impact is further emphasized in Policy E.5) of the VSCMP, which states that property improvements and ancillary structures that introduce greater potential for valleyland impacts, such as filling, shall be prohibited. As noted above, the significant amount of fill placed on site has resulted in an unacceptable loss of flood storage, and thus a significant impact on the Etobicoke Creek valleyland. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS TO FLOODPLAIN STORAGE / PRECEDENT The submitted engineering report concludes that the placement of fill will only marginally increase the Regional Storm event water levels across the subject site. However, these impacts are cumulatively important in terms of scale of impact. Although the report suggests the fill has caused only marginal impacts, TRCA Water Resources Engineering staff conclude that this anticipated degree of change is unacceptable in this sector of the urbanized main Etobicoke Creek. 378

11 When determining the risks associated with the fill activity, TRCA staff must also consider the management of the reach as a whole, and not only the subject site. TRCA staff is concerned about the loss of floodplain storage as this activity will negatively impact the overall function of the valley system to convey flood flows and will result in higher water levels downstream of the subject site. It is not possible to model the cumulative impacts to the Regional Floodplain water levels as a result of fill in the floodplain on a site-specific basis, given the current hydraulic modelling tools available. Although the impacts cannot be determined on a site specific basis, the cumulative impacts of permitting such fill or structural encroachments within the Regional Storm Floodplain will result in increases to the floodplain water levels. The recent floodplain mapping update of the Etobicoke Creek watershed indicated a significant watershed sensitivity to incremental development and floodplain change. In fact, additional areas of the subject property are now flood vulnerable during a Regional Storm event. Based on the preceding, TRCA staff has adopted a floodplain management approach that prohibits the placement of significant amounts of fill in the floodplain. This submission is, therefore, not supported as it contributes to the impact created by the cumulative loss of Regional Floodplain storage within the Etobicoke Creek watershed. Permitting this intrusion could be argued by future applicants to have established a precedent which will lead to similar applications or fill proposals after-the-fact within TRCA s jurisdiction, given the constant pressure for more land use intensification within existing urban areas. This, in turn, would lead to additional lands being located within the Regional Storm Floodplain and potentially greater flood risks to those lands which are already vulnerable to flooding. Planning and Development staff receive inquiries for similar works both in rural and urban areas on a frequent basis. Most inquiries for such works do not progress beyond the preliminary inquiry stage in part because staff has the ability to refer to TRCA's historically consistent approach to watershed management which has not allowed such works to be permitted. If this application is approved, staff will have difficulty opposing future applications for the placement or recognition of placement of significant amounts of fill within valley corridors, which will result in additional negative impacts to our more urbanized watersheds. If this application is approved, such works could also be proposed by others in order to create additional tableland for development. The cumulative impacts of permitting such development would put additional properties at risk of flooding and expose TRCA to liability for having permitted it. Indeed, the TRCA's position before the Mining and Lands Commissioner on future appeals relating to its refusal to permit filling will become less defensible. It is the opinion of TRCA staff that this application does not have any merit and could possibly, if approved, be argued by future applicants to have created a significant and negative precedent for TRCA and undermine the legitimacy of TRCA's policies which have also been upheld by the Mining and Lands Commissioner. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The restrictions to development within the floodplain, including the requirement for a TRCA permit, have been conveyed to the proponent through previous violation, planning and permit processes and is not a new circumstance. In summary, staff recommends that the application be denied for the following reasons: 379

12 1. The submission does not meet the tests applied to applications under Ontario Regulation 166/06. Specifically, this proposal will adversely affect the Control of Flooding as it: results in a loss in flood storage during a Regional Storm event within the Etobicoke Creek valley; 2. The submission does not comply with the objectives or policies of TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program. Specifically, it does not conform with Sections (C), 4.1, New Development, E. and E.5., Property Improvements and Ancillary Structures. 4. The submission could be argued by future applicants to have created a precedent that will: result in future consideration of similar proposals or after-the-fact applications to regularize significant amounts of fill within valley corridors in the City of Mississauga and other urbanized areas of TRCA s jurisdiction; undermine the consistent application of TRCA's policies; and reduce TRCA's ability to defend such policies at the Mining and Lands Commission. Report prepared by: Jason Wagler, extension s: jwagler@trca.on.ca For Information contact: Jason Wagler, extension s: jwagler@trca.on.ca Date: August 31, 2010 Attachments: 1 380

13 Attachment 1 381

14 SECTION I - ITEMS FOR AUTHORITY ACTION RES.#B100/10 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed Thornhill Ravines Development Corporation, CFN Purchase of property located east of Dufferin Street, south of Major Mackenzie Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gay Cowbourne Ron Moeser THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 1.25 hectares (3.10 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 19, Concession 2 and designated as Block 33 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Schaeffer & Dzaldov Limited, Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No A, dated June 22, 2010, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located east of Dufferin Street, south of Major Mackenzie Drive, be purchased from Thornhill Ravines Development Corporation; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including execution and signing of all necessary documentation. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A260/05 at Authority Meeting #9/05, held on November 25, 2005, approved the Greenlands Acquisition Project for Negotiations have been conducted with Ms. Bonica Leung, Planner, of Thornhill Ravines Development Corporation. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. Access to the subject lands will be directly available from the internal road system of the proposed subdivision. 382

15 RATIONALE The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don River watershed as outlined in the approved Greenlands Acquisition Project for Through the review of Phase 2A of subdivision 19T-03V01 for proposed single family lot residential development of this site, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 33 on Plan of Survey) which is comprised of the valley corridor of the East Don River at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on TRCA's preliminary review of the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption under the Provincial Conservation Land Tax Incentive Program, it would appear that all of the subject property would be eligible for exemption for the 2012 taxation year. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca or rdewell@trca.on.ca Date: July 07, 2010 Attachments: 1 383

16 Attachment 1 384

17 RES.#B101/10 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River Watershed E. Manson Investments Limited and Zureit Holdings Limited, CFN Purchase of property located east of Dufferin Street, north of Major Mackenzie Drive, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, under the "Greenlands Acquisition Project for ", Flood Plain and Conservation Component, Don River watershed. Moved by: Seconded by: Gay Cowbourne Ron Moeser THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT 0.90 hectares (2.22 acres), more or less, of vacant land being Part of Lot 22, Concession 2 and designated as Block 36 on a draft Plan of Subdivision prepared by Schaeffer Dzaldov Bennett Limited, Ontario Land Surveyors, under their Job No E, dated May 31, 2010, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, located east of Dufferin Street, north of Major Mackenzie Drive, be purchased from E. Manson Investments Limited and Zureit Holdings Limited; THAT the purchase price be $2.00; THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transaction at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs, and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to finalize the transaction including execution and signing of all necessary documentation. CARRIED BACKGROUND Resolution #A260/05 at Authority Meeting #9/05, held on November 25, 2005, approved the Greenlands Acquisition Project for Negotiations have been conducted with Ms. Mai Somermaa of Emery Investments, on behalf of E. Manson Investments Limited and Zureit Holdings Limited. Attached is a plan showing the location of the subject lands. Access to the property will be provided by an easement / right-of-way through Block 34 of the subdivision which will link Block 36 to the internal road system. 385

18 RATIONALE The subject property falls within TRCA's approved master plan for acquisition for the Don River watershed as outlined in the approved Greenlands Acquisition Project for Through the review of Phase 3 of subdivision 19T-00V02 for proposed single family lot residential development of this site, TRCA staff established the limits of the open space lands (i.e. Block 33 on Plan of Survey) which is comprised of the valley corridor of the East Don River at this location. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE Based on TRCA's preliminary review of the environmental criteria for lands that are eligible to receive a property tax exemption under the Provincial Conservation Land Tax Incentive Program, it would appear that all of the subject property would be eligible for exemption for the 2011 taxation year. The addition of the subject parcel of land will not significantly impact TRCA's maintenance costs at this location. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the TRCA land acquisition capital account. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca or rdewell@trca.on.ca Date: August 26, 2010 Attachments: 1 386

19 Attachment 1 387

20 RES.#B102/10 - GREENLANDS ACQUISITION PROJECT FOR Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project, CFN Partial takings from 10 property owners on the Lake Ontario shoreline, City of Toronto, in the Scarborough Community Council Area, to facilitate the construction of Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project. Moved by: Seconded by: Ron Moeser Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) acquire the following partial takings to facilitate the construction of the Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project: Parcel 'A' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.620 acres) being Part of Lots 169 and 170 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 2 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 50 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Hakeem Olajuwon; Parcel 'B' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.379 acres) being Part of Lots 168 and 169 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Parts 4 and 6 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 48 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Joanne and Robert Brown; Parcel 'C' THAT two parcels of land containing hectares (1.033 acres) being Part of Lots 165, 167 and 168 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Parts 8, 10 and 14 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 32 and 42 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from William Wai-Leung Chan; Parcel 'D' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.426 acres) being Part of Lot 166 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 12 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 38 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from David Keane and Melba Cuddy-Keane; Parcel 'E' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.431 acres) being Part of Lot 164 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 16 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 30 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Trevor Harris; 388

21 Parcel 'F' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.440 acres) being Part of Lot 163 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 18 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 22 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Gisela, Rudolph and Margot Braune; Parcel 'G' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.334 acres) being Part of Lot 162 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 20 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 20 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Daphne and William Webster; Parcel 'H' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.383 acres) being Part of Lot 161 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 22 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 16 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Janet Fitzpatrick and Alister Sinclair; Parcel 'I' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.353 acres) being Part of Lot 160 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 24 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 10 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Susan Scinocca; Parcel 'J' THAT a parcel of land containing hectares (0.541 acres) being Part of Lot 159 on Registered Plan M-440, designated as Part 26 on a plan of survey prepared by Vinklers Wallace Ertl Limited dated July 15, 2010 and referenced as DWG T-0022-RP, City of Toronto (formerly City of Scarborough) and municipally known as 2 Meadowcliffe Drive be purchased from Ronald and Ruby Gunraj; THAT the purchase price for each of the parcels be $2.00 plus vendor's reasonable legal costs and the owners entering into an erosion control agreement; THAT TRCA receive conveyance of the land free from encumbrance, subject to existing service easements; THAT the firm of Gardiner Roberts LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, be instructed to complete the transactions at the earliest possible date. All reasonable expenses incurred incidental to the closing for land transfer tax, legal costs and disbursements are to be paid; AND FURTHER THAT the appropriate TRCA officials be authorized and directed to execute all necessary documentation required. CARRIED 389

22 BACKGROUND The Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project was originally developed in 1985, at the request of several homeowners concerned over the loss of property and the potential long term risk to their homes. After geotechnical review by Terraprobe in 2006, and review of long term solutions to the shoreline erosion by Shoreplan Engineering, TRCA submitted the Environmental Study Report for the project to the Ministry of the Environment per the Environmental Assessment Act in March, The preferred solution determined through the Environmental Assessment process is a shoreline treatment consisting of cobble beach anchored by a series of parallel headlands which will protect 600 metres of eroding bluff below Meadowcliffe Drive. Construction of this project commenced in the summer of 2010, in terms of stockpiling materials for the project. The project will provide protection for 13 parcels of land involving 10 owners along the south side of Meadowcliffe Drive between Cudia Park and Bellamy Ravine. The subject parcels being acquired are strips of land below the 86 metre contour line which is approximately the lower one quarter of the bluff face. The lands to be retained by the owners include the upper portion of the bluffs face together with the tablelands above the bluffs and the improvements. The Ontario Heritage Trust (OHT) owns a property at 1 Meadowcliffe Drive. TRCA acquired the shoreline from this property when TRCA undertook the Bellamy Ravine Erosion Control Project. Based on a review of the survey, TRCA owns sufficient land at this location for construction of the access road and revetment. It may be necessary in the future to enter into an agreement with OHT to undertake slope buttressing. RATIONALE The subject property is required for the construction of the Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project. TAXES AND MAINTENANCE The parcels of land will be turned over to the City of Toronto under the terms of the existing management agreement. FINANCIAL DETAILS Funds for the costs related to this purchase are available in the Meadowcliffe Drive Erosion Control Project, through the City of Toronto capital. Report prepared by: Dan O Donohue, extension s: do donohue@trca.on.ca For Information contact: Dan O Donohue, extension 5767; Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension s: do donohue@trca.on.ca; mfenning@trca.on.ca or rdewell@trca.on.ca Date: August 26, 2010 Attachments: 1 390

23 Attachment 1 391

24 RES.#B103/10 - Moved by: Seconded by: REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY-OWNED LAND West side of Weston Road, north of Highway No. 401, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), CFN Toronto and Region Conservation Authority is in receipt of a request for a land exchange of a parcel of Toronto and Region Conservation Authority land located on the west side of Weston Road, north of Highway No. 401, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), Humber River watershed. Ron Moeser Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) land located on the west side of Weston Road, north of Highway No. 401, City of Toronto (Etobicoke York Community Council Area), be retained for conservation purposes. CARRIED BACKGROUND A letter has been received from Mr. Guillaume Lavictoire of Rueter Scargall Bennett LLP, who is acting on behalf of Dulane Construction Company Ltd., Torch Investments Ltd. and Hillhurst Acres Ltd., requesting that the subject parcel of TRCA land situated on the west side of Weston Road, north of Highway No. 401 be exchanged for the valleyland portion of his clients' neighbouring property to the north. At Executive Committee Meeting #10/09, held on December 11, 2009, Resolution #B180/09 was approved as follows: THAT the potential disposal of a parcel of land located on the west side of Weston Road, north of Highway No. 401, City of Toronto - Etobicoke York Community Council Area, be referred to Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) staff for review and discussion in accordance with established TRCA policies; AND FURTHER THAT a report be brought forward to the Executive Committee at a future date recommending further action. This request was circulated to City of Toronto staff and TRCA staff for review and comment. The following comments have been received: City of Toronto Staff Comments The City is not allowed to sell parkland; however, the City can exchange parkland provided that the exchange meets Parks, Forestry and Recreation Department (PF&R) objectives and meets policies set out in the Official Plan. 392

25 Section of the Official Plan notes that: Parkland Cannot Be Sold: The policy prohibits the sale of city-owned land (not just parkland but any city lands) that are part of the Green Space System which means designated Parks and Open Space (POS). But it Can Be Exchanged: The policy recognizes that in some cases it would be acceptable to exchange City-owned POS land if the land to be exchanged is: nearby (i.e. within normal walking distance); equivalent or larger in area; and comparable or superior green space utility (i.e. does the exchange make the park the same or better). PF&R staff has said that this land exchange would comply with the Official Plan policies for land exchange involving areas designated as open space. TRCA Staff Comments Planning and Development staff does not support the request for disposal of TRCA lands at this location for the following reasons: The Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) sets out the policy Framework for TRCA. The VSCMP defines the limits of stream/valley corridors to include a minimum of 10 metres inland from the top of valley bank, provided that the stream or valley is in a stable condition. In the case of the subject lands, the top of valley bank is located on the far eastern portion of the property near the road, placing the entire property within the valley and its 10 metre buffer. In addition, one of the principles in the VSCMP states: "the successful management of valley and stream corridors is dependent on good tableland management". Removing lands that are considered to be buffers from public ownership does not meet the notion of good tableland management. Finally, as part of day-to-day negotiations with the development industry and private property owners, staff always endeavors to obtain a buffer for the protection of ecological features/stream and valley corridors as well as to protect private lands. A plan illustrating the location of the subject lands is attached. CONCLUSION While the City of Toronto's Official Plan policies do allow exchanges of park land in certain circumstances, the disposal of the subject parcel of land is contrary to TRCA's VSCMP policies as well as TRCA's mandate to conserve natural areas and protect adjacent land from natural hazards. Therefore, staff is recommending that the subject parcel be retained. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca or rdewell@trca.on.ca Date: August 24, 2010 Attachments: 1 393

26 Attachment 1 394

27 RES.#B104/10 - Moved by: Seconded by: TOWN OF CALEDON Request for a permanent easement for a stormwater management facility and purchase of property located north of Mayfield Road and east of Highway 10, Town of Caledon and City of Brampton, Region of Peel, CFN Receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon and Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited to provide a permanent easement for a stormwater management facility and purchase of property located north of Mayfield Road and east of Highway 10, Town of Caledon and City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek watershed. Gay Cowbourne Ron Moeser THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the Town of Caledon for a stormwater management facility which will assist Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited with their development in this vicinity; WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interests of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the Town of Caledon and Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a permanent easement containing hectares ( acres), more or less, be granted to the Town of Caledon for a stormwater management facility to facilitate the development of adjacent lands owned by Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited, said land being part of Lot 18, Concession 1 E.H.S., designated as Part 1 on Plan 43R-33386, Town of Caledon and City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, subject to the following terms and conditions: (a) (b) The easement price is $295,176 which is to be paid by Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited to TRCA, plus all legal and survey costs incurred to complete the transaction; In addition, Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited will provide the following: (i) purchase of a parcel of land by TRCA for nominal consideration of $2.00 containing hectares ( acres), said land being part of Lot 18, Concession 1 E.H.S., designated as Part 2 on Plan 43R-33386, City of Brampton, Regional Municipality of Peel, subject to a permanent easement for the stormwater management facility; (ii) contribution towards the Etobicoke Creek Regeneration Project in an amount satisfactory to TRCA staff be made to mitigate for the adverse impacts of the stormwater management facility on the natural system; (c) All disturbed areas are to be restored to the satisfaction of TRCA as soon as possible after completion of construction; 395

28 (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) Sediment control measures in a manner satisfactory to TRCA are to be practiced during construction; Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited shall monitor the effectiveness of the facility for a two year period following construction and rectify to the satisfaction of both Town of Caledon and TRCA staff any performance issues; The Town of Caledon is to be responsible for all repairs and/or maintenance of the stormwater management facility which may be required in perpetuity and for indemnifying TRCA from any and all claims arising from the construction; An archaeological investigation is to be conducted before any site disturbance with any mitigative measures required being carried out all at the expense of Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited to the satisfaction of TRCA; Any additional considerations as deemed appropriate by TRCA staff or its solicitor. THAT said easement be subject to an Order in Council being issued in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27 as amended; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to implement the easement agreement, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The proposed stormwater management facility will service lands owned by Fernbrook Homes (Etobicoke Creek) Limited located north of Mayfield Road and east of Highway 10, Town of Caledon and City of Brampton, Etobicoke Creek watershed. In accordance with TRCA guidelines ''Use of Authority Owned Lands For Storm Water Management" approved at Authority Meeting #11/92, held on January 22, 1993, the proponent has demonstrated that the proposed location on TRCA-owned land is reasonable and all technical requirements of TRCA staff has been satisfied. A permit is required under Ontario Regulation 166/06 and the report relating to the permit is on the agenda of this Executive Committee meeting. The Town of Caledon hosted a Public Information Session on April 5, 2006 to explain the proposed application. The Town of Caledon Council endorsed the staff recommendation supporting draft approval of the Fernbrook subdivision on July 7, 2009 which was also a public meeting. The subject land is part of a larger parcel acquired from the E. & H. B. Ellis under the Snelgrove Dam & Reservoir Project on February 28, 1972 and from A. & R. Snell under Etobicoke Creek component of the Land Acquisition Project on August 17,

29 Staff has carried out negotiations with representatives of the developer and respectfully submit that the compensation package relating to the hectares ( acres) easement, is fair and reasonable. The total compensation package includes $295,176 for purchase of the permanent easement and an additional payment to produce an ecological net gain in the Etobicoke Creek watershed. This payment will be determined based on the characteristics of the subject lands and the impacts the stormwater management facility has on the natural environment. FINANCIAL DETAILS It is proposed that the compensation obtained from this easement be utilized for the purchase of priority properties under the Greenlands Acquisition Project. Report prepared by: Mike Fenning, extension s: For Information contact: Mike Fenning, extension 5223 or Ron Dewell, extension s: or Date: August 13, 2010 Attachments: 1 397

30 Attachment 1 398

31 RES.#B105/10 - Moved by: Seconded by: CITY OF TORONTO Conveyance of Land for Beechgrove Drive, south of Lawrence Avenue East, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Highland Creek Watershed, CFN Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for conveyance of land for Beechgrove Drive, south of Lawrence Avenue East, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). Gay Cowbourne Ron Moeser THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to convey certain lands for Beechgrove Drive, south of Lawrence Avenue East, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area); AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA-owned land containing hectares (0.111 acres), more or less, required for Beechgrove Drive, said land being Part of Block A, Registered Plan M-1080, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area) designated as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on Plan 66R-24996, be conveyed to the City of Toronto; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by the City of Toronto; THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this sale; THAT said conveyance be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT the authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED BACKGROUND The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired by TRCA from Ravine View Investments Limited on February 18, 1965, under the Highland Creek Component of the Land Acquisition Project. The City of Toronto has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that the TRCA lands required for Beechgrove Drive be conveyed for the nominal consideration of $

32 A portion of TRCA land at this location extends onto Beechgrove Drive immediately south of the intersection with Lawrence Avenue East. This section of Beechgrove Drive has been utilized as a road since 1963 and the City of Toronto wishes to acquire the property to regularize the situation. There is no construction proposed as part of this sale. FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca or rdewell@trca.on.ca Date: August 23, 2010 Attachments: 1 400

33 Attachment 1 401

34 RES.#B106/10 - Moved by: Seconded by: CITY OF TORONTO Conveyance of Land for the Construction of a Cul-de-sac as Part of the Partial Closure of Kirkhams Road, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), Rouge River Watershed, CFN Receipt of a request from the City of Toronto for conveyance of land for the construction of a cul-de-sac as part of the partial closure of Kirkhams Road, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area). Ron Moeser Jack Heath THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT WHEREAS Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) is in receipt of a request from the City of Toronto to convey certain lands for the construction of a cul-de-sac as part of the partial closure of Kirkhams Road, in the City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area); AND WHEREAS it is in the opinion of TRCA that it is in the best interest of TRCA in furthering its objectives, as set out in Section 20 of the Conservation Authorities Act, to cooperate with the City of Toronto in this instance; THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT a parcel of TRCA-owned land containing 0.12 hectares (0.29 acres), more or less, required for the construction of a cul-de-sac as part of the partial closure of Kirkhams Road, said land being Part of Lot 5, Concession 3, City of Toronto (Scarborough Community Council Area), designated as Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4 on a draft Plan of Survey prepared by the City of Toronto Technical Services - Survey and Mapping, entitled: KIRKHAMS ROAD, under their Job No , dated September 21, 2009, be conveyed to the City of Toronto; THAT consideration be the nominal sum of $2.00, plus all legal, survey and other costs to be paid by the City of Toronto; THAT an archaeological investigation be completed, with any mitigative measures being carried out to the satisfaction of TRCA staff, at the expense of the City of Toronto; THAT the conveyance of land be subject to a landscaping plan, subject to the approval of TRCA staff; THAT the City of Toronto is to fully indemnify TRCA from any and all claims from injuries, damages or costs of any nature resulting in any way, either directly or indirectly, from this sale or the carrying out of construction; THAT said conveyance be subject to approval of the Minister of Natural Resources in accordance with Section 21(2) of the Conservation Authorities Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.27, as amended; AND FURTHER THAT authorized TRCA officials be directed to take whatever action may be required to give effect thereto, including the obtaining of necessary approvals and the signing and execution of any documents. CARRIED 402

35 BACKGROUND The subject lands form part of a larger acreage acquired by TRCA from Glen-Rouge Parks Limited on January 26, 1968 and the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto on October 4, 1983, under the Rouge River Component of the Land Acquisition Project. The City of Toronto has conveyed lands to TRCA over the years for nominal consideration of $2.00 and has requested that TRCA lands required for the construction of the cul-de-sac as part of the partial closure of Kirkhams Road be conveyed for the nominal consideration of $2.00. This City of Toronto road project has been reviewed under the Schedule C Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) process by TRCA staff. The City proposal consists of the removal of the severely deteriorated Kirkhams Road bridge and substructure; re-instatement and renaturalization of the Rouge River valley; relocation of the existing watermain by trenchless technology under the Rouge River; creation of cul-de-sacs north and south of the river; and a gate at Meadowvale Road which will be used for access by maintenance vehicles. Only the north cul-de-sac will occur on TRCA property. The EA process has been completed and TRCA staff is presently reviewing a permit application pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06 for the proposed Kirkhams Road project. The permit application will be considered at a future Executive Committee meeting. Rouge Park staff has reviewed the proposed sale of TRCA-owned land to the City of Toronto for the purpose of constructing a cul-de-sac following the removal of the Kirkhams Road bridge and confirm that the City has selected an appropriate location in an area of relatively limited environmental sensitivity. Overall, Rouge Park is supportive of the Kirkham's Road bridge removal, as it will ultimately be ecologically beneficial to this section of the Rouge River valley and, therefore, has no opposition to the proposed property sale. A plan illustrating the fee simple conveyance and temporary easement locations is attached. Plantings: All lands disturbed by construction will be stabilized and, where deemed appropriate by TRCA staff, revegetated with native woody and herbaceous plant material in accordance with existing TRCA landscaping guidelines. A landscape plan will be prepared and form part of the permit pursuant to Ontario Regulation 166/06. FINANCIAL DETAILS The City of Toronto has agreed to assume all legal, survey and other costs involved in completing this transaction. Report prepared by: George Leja, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca For Information contact: George Leja, extension 5342 or Ron Dewell, extension s: gleja@trca.on.ca or rdewell@trca.on.ca Date: August 24, 2010 Attachments: 1 403

36 Attachment 1 404