Recommendations Affecting the University Heights Neighborhood that Overlap Both the Uptown and North Park Community Planning Areas
|
|
- Nathaniel Jackson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 October 21, 2010 William Anderson, Director City Planning and Community Investment City of San Diego 202 C Street, MS 5A San Diego, CA RE: Recommendations Affecting the University Heights Neighborhood that Overlap Both the and North Park Community Planning Areas Dear Mr. Anderson: As the City of San Diego updates the and North Park Community Plans, the University Heights Historical Society requests that the City adopt and incorporate the following measures for University Heights into both these plans. Our recommendations are based upon meetings of the University Heights Planning Committee and the University Heights Community Development Corporation, both of which are comprised of North Park and property owners, and upon a survey of residents and businesses in University Heights. The following is a summary of our recommendations; a variety of maps and documents are attached which provide more specific recommendations for these areas. Land Use, Zoning and Height Preserve existing neighborhood oriented areas that have a wide variety of housing types and that physically define the neighborhood development pattern over time. Establish Land Use, Zoning, and Height recommendations as outlined in the attached table and map. Conservation Areas Building on the proposal by the City in the 2007 Historic Survey, develop and implement Conservation Area Overlay Zones in each area to protect existing character in specific areas of University Heights, while planning for new construction that is compatible with the existing neighborhood.
2 Historic Preservation Promote historic preservation by establishing new and expanding existing historical districts. Building on recommendations by the City for a potential West University Heights Historic District, we recommend the establishment of four additional potential districts (Spalding Place, Valle Vista, Lincoln Street Annex to the West University Heights Historical District, and the Educational Complex) and expanding the boundaries of the Shirley Ann Place Historic District. Attached please find the following documents with specific recommendations for each of the forgoing areas: Map showing recommended changes in zoning and height restrictions Table describing recommended changes in zoning and height restrictions Map showing existing, city-proposed, and community-proposed historic districts and conservation areas Urban Design Guidelines Draft Council Policy on Conservation Areas Results of University Heights Neighborhood Survey We would be pleased to meet with you to discuss and answer any questions concerning these recommendations. We believe that both the University Heights and North Park communities wholeheartedly support these recommendations and look forward to working with you to make them a reality. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kristin Harms Mary Wendorf Ernestine Bonn Chair Vice-Chair Founding Member Cc: Councilmember Todd Gloria Steve Hill, City of San Diego Land Use and Housing Committee Consultant Rob Steppke, Chair, North Park Planning Committee Leo Wilson, Chair, Planners
3 UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS AND NORTH PARK Existing, City-Proposed, and Community-Proposed Historic Districts and Conservation Areas ADAMS AVE MADISON AVE MEADE AVE NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY AVE LANDIS ST UPAS ST KEY -North Park Planning Area Boundary University Heights Boundary North Park Boundary Existing historic districts City-proposed historic districts Community-proposed historic districts Community-proposed residential conservation areas Community-proposed commercial conservation areas
4 UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS Recommended Changes to Zoning and Height Restrictions UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS 1 ADAMS AVE MADISON AVE. 2 5 Georgia Florida Alabama MONROE AVE. 1 MEADE AVE. MEADE AVE 6 3 EL CAJON 4 LINCOLN UPTOWN NORTH PARK UNIVERSITY AVE KEY University Heights Boundary -North Park Planning Area Boundary Single family residential, R1-7, 1 to 2 story height limit Low medium multi-family residential, MR-3000, 1 to 2 story height limit Medium multi-family residential, MR-1500, 30 foot height limit Medium high multi-family residential, MR-1000, 30 foot height limit Commercial district, MR-1500, 30 foot height limit San Diego Unified School District, MR-3000, 30 foot height limit
5 University Heights Planning Committee Recommendations for the Community Plan: Land Use, Zoning, and Heights Area Description of Map Areas Recommended Zoning Recommended Heights Planning Area 1 Single Family Refer to UH Map as there have been a number of changes increasing the Single Family designation R -1-7 add Maryland/ Lincoln/Johnson/Hayes; east/west streets: Madison/Monroe/Meade/ Van Buren; Tyler east to Cleveland. The west end of Adams to alleykeeping commercial use from alley to Park Blvd. 1 2 Stories - conforms to built environment 2 Low Medium Multi-Family Refer to UH Map 3 Medium Multi-Family Res. Refer to UH Map MR-3000 (2 on 1 lot) with second dwelling unit built behind to retain a sf character to the street front. No lot consolidation. Areas have remained stable within this designation. MR-1500 (15-29 DU/Ac) No lot consolidation 1-2 Stories conforms to built environment 30 Height Limit conforms to built environment 4 Medium High Multi-Family Res. North side Washington St.: Normal St. to Maryland St. Refer to UH Map 5 Park Blvd. Commercial Area Adams Ave. to Lincoln Ave. both sides. Recommended Conservation Area. Refer to UH Map MR-1000 (29-44 DU/Ac) If lot consolidation, then discretionary. MR-1500 Mixed-Use (CN-3 or CV-3 Zone that would provide and add to best neighborhood uses currently in place.) East side is in NP Planning Area and both sides should reflect a mirror image. 30 Height Limit (2-3 stories). Not suitable for Mixed-use in this area because of the traffic constraints. 30 Height Limit The height of new construction should relate to the height of existing development. Abrupt variances in scale between large commercial & adjacent residential should be avoided. 1
6 University Heights Planning Committee Recommendations for the Community Plan: Land Use, Zoning, and Heights Area Description of Map Areas Recommended Zoning Recommended Heights Planning Area 6 San Diego Unified School District/Ed Center Proposed Historic District with Teachers Training Bldg. Annex 1 as site for future UH Branch Library Institutional Overlay Zone with underlying zone MR-3000; Site has a number of historically significant buildings. A Historic Survey is on file with City. 30 Height Limit conforms to built environment. 7 El Cajon Blvd. east from Park Blvd. to Texas St. both sides MR-1000 Mixed- Use Residential 3 4 Stories Set-back 2 nd Floor North Park 8 East of Park Blvd. from Lincoln on the South to Adams on the North (all North to South Sts) Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana. Florida from Meade to Adams Ave. 9 Florida St. - North of El Cajon Blvd. to Meade Ave. on the east side. MR Stories North Park MR Stories North Park 2
7 University Heights Urban Design Guidelines Combined Outline for Historic Preservation and Community Character Elements October 2010 We recommend the following items for inclusion in the update of the Community Plan and where applicable in the Update of the North Park Community Plan. I. Historic Preservation Element a. Goal of the Historic Preservation Element University Heights first subdivision was recorded on August 6, 1888, and its early development was influenced by the proposed location of a branch of the University of Southern California. However, the failure of that educational body did not deter the location in 1898 of the San Diego Normal School on that site. The site to this day is an educational complex comprising the San Diego Unified School District offices, Birney Elementary, the remnants of the San Diego Normal School; namely, the Nationally designated Teachers Training Building, as well as other significant structures. The community has completed an historic survey of this site as well as the local designation of the Adams Avenue Car Barn property now the Trolley Barn Park, and the vestiges of the Mission Cliff Gardens - an earlier version of Balboa Park. University Heights is a village in and of itself, and one of the early streetcar suburbs. The goals of the historic preservation element are (1) Continue to advance the preservation and designation of the unique historic and architecturally significant homes, commercial and institutional buildings, streetcar lines, streetscapes, landscapes, viewscapes and other historic resources; (2) Implement Conservation Areas and Historic Districts in University Heights; and (3) Maintain the community s unique historic character. b. Introduction to Preservation Element i. The Community Plan should include a local context statement and history of University Heights. ii. There should be a description of the existing environment, including designated resources, and historical districts. c. Implementation Plan i. Complete the Historic Survey and the North Park Historic Survey using State approved status codes. Address those areas historically defined as University Heights Subdivisions that overlap into the North Park Planning Area, and identify potential historic districts and other historical resources. ii Process historic districts based on results of the completed and North Park Surveys that list University Heights subdivisions, and adopt tailored design guidelines for historic districts. iii. Encourage any infill development to be sensitive to the character and scale of existing identified historical resources impacted by such development by adopting: 1. Height limits in mixed-use and commercially zoned areas that are sympathetic to existing low-scale nature of the neighborhood and do not overwhelm adjacent residential areas. 2. Respect the main street or village streetscape that gives the University Heights Business District its distinct character by 1
8 University Heights Urban Design Guidelines Combined Outline for Historic Preservation and Community Character Elements October 2010 implementing design guidelines for mix-use and commercially zoned areas. iv. Retain the existing single family structures that are being utilized in the business district as commercial enterprises that fit within the allowable land uses. v. Encourage adaptive reuse to preserve historic resources. vi. Require recycling of building materials and interior architectural accessories from demolished older properties. vii. Install historic acorn style street lighting. An economically feasible time would be when utility under-grounding occurs. viii. Require replacement of sidewalks with the historic sidewalk scoring patterns, coloration, and texture. Retain historic contractor stamps by saw cutting for placement as close as possible to original location. Preserve original sidewalks when possible also sidewalk stamps and property line markers. II. Community Character Element a. Goal of the Community Character Element University Heights is one of the early streetcar suburbs and maintains its original village character. We recommend that the Community Plan contain guidelines for specific elements that will preserve the character of the early development pattern that was and still is present. This pattern matches the Neighborhood/Community Center factors in the 2008 General Plan s Land Use and Housing Planning Element as follows: i. Neighborhood-oriented areas unique to the community in which they are located; ii. Variety of housing types and rents/prices, including multi-family residential uses; iii. Including some structures with office or residential space above commercial space; iv. Public facilities such as schools, libraries, or other community facilities; v. Inviting, accessible, and attractive streets and public spaces; vi. Public gathering spaces and/or civic uses, including public parks, community meeting spaces, outdoor gathering spaces, open space areas that contain desirable landscape and streetscape design amenities, or outdoor dining and market activities; vii. Local commercial uses and local offices; viii. Integrated to the maximum extent possible in order to encourage a pedestrianoriented design and encourage transit ridership; ix. Increasingly connected to other villages by an expanded regional transit system. b. Implementation Plan i. Preserve existing neighborhood oriented areas that have a wide variety of housing types and that physically define the neighborhood development pattern over time. 2
9 University Heights Urban Design Guidelines Combined Outline for Historic Preservation and Community Character Elements October Preserve existing single-family neighborhoods, including homes in areas zoned multi-family; 2. Modify the Land Development Code/MidCity Planned District Ordinance Zoning Regulations to preserve the existing development pattern that has historically defined University Heights. Use the original built environment as the standard: maintain setbacks, FAR, lot coverage, architectural fenestrations, footprint, height, and street patterns of the original sub-divisions; 3. Maintain single-family character on the street by requiring new development behind front home. Require same scale & height when building on back of property. 4. Require pedestrian friendly front yards, porches, and windows that provide a view on the street for safety; i.e. eyes on the street. 5. Use quality natural building materials, and require wood doors and windows (no vinyl windows) when restoring, remodeling or adding additions to older homes. 6. Disallow lot consolidations in residential areas, and require discretionary review in the business district. ii. Develop and implement Conservation Area Overlay Zones including those areas that overlap into the North Park Planning Area boundaries, and: 1. Define ways to conserve existing character while planning for new construction that is compatible with existing neighborhood; 2. Establish design guidelines and review process; 3. Include heightened scrutiny for demolition in Conservation Areas; 4. Map-out proposed Conservation Areas. iii. Protect and increase inviting, accessible, attractive streets, public spaces and public gathering places. Protect, manage, and acquire natural canyon, open-space areas and view corridors, and: 1. Utilize paper streets to establish trails and add to open space; 2. Provide green spaces in multi-family developments for dog runs; 3. Protect and manage public parks; acquire and develop park space to bring University Heights closer to compliance with General Plan standards for park acreage; 4. Establish landscaping guidelines and standards for public right-of-ways in the residential and commercial zones; determine trees for each street parkway and plant as a community project; 5. Provide appropriate traffic calming along thoroughfares and neighborhood collector streets in University Heights; 3
10 University Heights Urban Design Guidelines Combined Outline for Historic Preservation and Community Character Elements October Build safe walkways and bike paths to connect University Heights to Hillcrest over Hwy 163 and down Texas Street to Mission Valley. 7. Increase on-street parking to offset business and residential deficiencies; 8. Maintain public furniture and trash/recycling receptacles; 9. Establish guidelines and limits for billboards, outdoor advertising and signage; 10. Encourage use of the City s Storefront Improvement Program; 11. Promote public art where feasible with community input. iv. Support community character through appropriately designed local commercial uses and local offices, including office or residential space above commercial space, and: 1. Establish and enforce appropriate maximum building heights in commercial and mixed-use area zones of University Heights in both the and North Park Planning Areas; 2. Support development, redevelopment, adaptive reuse and continued existence of commercial areas that can serve as public gathering or community center spaces especially dining and market areas especially on south side of Adams Avenue from SE corner of Alabama to Park Boulevard; from Park Boulevard on east and west sides to Lincoln Avenue mirror image on both and North Park sides of Park Boulevard; 3. Ensure sufficient parking facilities in new commercial projects (No Tandem Parking). Monitor and increase parking for existing commercial areas as needed in order to avoid impacts to the adjacent residential neighborhoods; 4. Disallow tandem parking in new development in University Heights. Require one full parking space per bedroom in multi-family units. 5. Process condo conversions as discretionary projects to ensure appropriate design, compatibility and landscaping. v. Support pedestrian-, bicycle- and community appropriate mobility options and transit alternatives to improve safety. vi. Define boundaries of University Heights and unite community into one planning group. 4
City of Villages Parking Strategies. William Anderson, FAICP City Planning & Community Investment San Diego Parking Symposium July 14, 2006
City of Villages Parking Strategies William Anderson, FAICP City Planning & Community Investment San Diego Parking Symposium July 14, 2006 City of Villages Strategy A hierarchy of walkable, mixed use districts
More information, C-MS I June 3, 2016 $1500 pd chk #216918
, C-MS-8 LOTS 21 THROUGH 40, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 299 CLEMENTS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF DENVER SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST, SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY
More informationDRAFT. 10% Common Open Space
% OF CHARLOTTE IS CATEGORIZED AS A. LAND USES : Placeholder map displaying location of Place Type GOALS: Accommodate XX% of future growth. Provide a concentration of primarily commercial and civic activity
More informationCHAPTER 1. Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1
INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 Ms. Guajardo s Class - Central Elementary CH 1 1 1.1 SETTING South Centre City is a linear corridor south of Downtown Escondido paralleling Centre City Parkway and South Escondido
More informationelk grove design guidelines Table Contents
Table Contents of I. Introduction... 7 A. Purpose and Intent...7 B. Background...7 C. Organization and Use...8 II. Administration... 11 A. What is Design Review?...11 B. When is Design Review Required?...11
More informationLOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NO: CPC 2006-9374 CRA CEQA: Exempt DATE: December 21, 2006 Location: Valley Plaza and Laurel Plaza TIME: after
More informationA Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006
A Context-Based Design Code for Pedestrian & Transit-Oriented Development RAIL~VOLUTION NOVEMBER 2006 Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update. Project Overview City of Palo Alto Palo Alto Zoning Ordinance Update.
More informationTable L-1 Summary Action Strategy. Action Item Timing Status Responsible Agency
CHAPTER 4: CIRCULATION ELEMENT ISSUE #1: MAJOR THOROUFARES AND TRANSPORTATION ROUTES A balanced transportation system for Fontana is provided that meets the mobility needs of current and future residents
More informationBUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5 ELEMENTS:... 5 FAÇADES (COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL) 5
VISION STATEMENT 3 UTILIZATION OF THE GUIDELINES 3 IMPLEMENTATION 3 PROCEDURES FOR DESIGN REVIEW 3 LAND USE AND ZONING 4 LAND USE 4 ELEMENTS:... 4 ZONING 4 ELEMENTS:... 4 BUILDING SCALE AND SETBACKS 5
More informationSheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N
Sheridan Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N 1 City of Lakewood Adopted November, 2006 S H E R I D A N B O U L E VA R D S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N The Vision The City of Lakewood s overall vision is
More informationStatus Report: MD 355 Project
Status Report: MD 355 Project OCTOBER 2006 M-NCPPC MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Summary of Community Comments, and break to the Results of the MD 355 Participation Session Brookside Gardens -
More informationGREENING THE BOULEVARD Master Plan Concepts for Venice Boulevard between Lincoln and Sawtelle
GREENING THE BOULEVARD Katherine Spitz Associates Inc. 4212½ Glencoe Avenue Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 310 574 4460 Fax 574 4462 January 2008 Table of Contents Overview Proposed Design Improvements Illustration
More informationREDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN
REDLANDS TRANSIT VILLAGES SPECIFIC PLAN CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION JANUARY 4, 2019 Redlands Blvd. Eureka St. Orange St. State St. Citrus Ave. Vine St. GENERAL PLAN TRANSIT VILLAGES WE ARE HERE SPECIFIC
More informationGUIDING PRINCIPLES IN THIS CHAPTER
GUIDING PRINCIPLES The guiding principles and design concepts in this chapter work together with the Chapel Hill 2020 Comprehensive Plan to support new public places that can be enjoyed by all while also
More informationSMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS. An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation
SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS An Illustrated Working Draft for Test Implementation SMALL LOT DESIGN STANDARDS ILLUSTRATED WORKING FOR TEST IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW SMALL LOT CODE AMENDMENT & POLICY UPDATE
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationCommercial Development Standards. City of Homestead
Commercial Development Standards City of Homestead Presentation Outline Introductions Purpose and Intent Objectives Administrative Process Established Districts Design Standards Purpose and Intent Supplement
More informationMIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT
MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT Zoning regulations developed by committee to the Planning Board for the Town of DeWitt, NY Issue date: 13 July 2017 revised 3/12/2018, revised 4/26/2018, 5/9/2018
More informationBe it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new A (Transit Oriented Development (TOD) District) is adopted:
Local Law No. 4 of 2018 (Adoption of 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development District) Be it enacted by the Town Board of the Town of Guilderland that the following new 280-18A (Transit Oriented Development
More informationCitizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011
Citizen Advisory Group Meeting 5: Land Use April 14, 2011 Meeting Agenda 1. Background Review 2. Transportation Follow-up 3. PED Overlay Approach 4. Land Use Mapping 5. Group Exercise 6. Wrap-up and Next
More informationLower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013
Lower Merion Commercial Districts Issues and Characteristics Handbook November 2013 DRAFT TOWNSHIP-WIDE VISION: To maintain and enhance commercial areas to complement the surrounding high-quality residential
More informationRESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS The residential district standards have been revised to reflect on-the-ground conditions, while continuing to respect the use patterns established within the neighborhoods. This will
More informationEast Central Area Plan
East Central Area Plan Steering Committee Meeting March 8 th, 2018 CHUN Tears McFarlane House Vision Statement Development Opportunities Analysis Vision Elements 1. Equitable, Affordable and Inclusive
More informationC-I-10. The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: B. Reduce the cluttered aspects of current development by:
C-I-10 PART C SECTION I ARTICLE 10 GENERAL REGULATIONS PROJECT SITE REVIEW I. Purpose The effect of establishing a comprehensive site review as follows will: A. Protect streetscapes from projects that
More informationUrban Planning and Land Use
Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: City Planning
More informationIntroduction. Chapter 1. Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1
Chapter 1 Introduction Lakewood 2025: Moving Forward Together Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan Plan Organization Planning Process & Community Input 1-1 Purpose of the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive
More informationZoning Code Issues Prioritization
City of Streetsboro The City of Streetsboro has begun the process of updating its Zoning Code. The new Zoning Code will be based on the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, which establishes the overall
More informationCitizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee
Citizen Comment Staff Response Staff Recommended Revision Planning Committee Area No. 1: Owner desires retail land uses. Area No. 1a: Owner of two small parcels adjacent to Area No. 1 desires retail land
More informationCommunity Design Plan
Gardena General Plan 2006 Authority While the is not a required element of a General Plan, it is included because improving the community appearance and image is paramount to the overall quality of life
More informationCHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES. City of Greensburg Comprehensive Plan. Introduction. Vision Statement. Growth Management Goals.
CHAPTER 3 VISION, GOALS, & PLANNING PRINCIPLES Introduction The Greensburg Comprehensive Plan is intended as a working community document. A combination of long and short-term goals, this document is intended
More informationListening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware
Listening Sessions: Guiding Principles and Unified Development Code New Castle County, Delaware March 2015 AGENDA Introduction: Who We Are Work Program and Schedule Guiding Principles Discussion Project
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting October 15, 2005 DATE: September 28, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise the adoption of the 2005 Clarendon Sector Plan C. M. RECOMMENDATION:
More informationPlanning Board Briefing
Planning Board Briefing Why Now? The Sector Plan Implementation Chapter States: Before Stage 1 begins, the following must occur: Approval of the Sectional Map Amendment. Approval of the Greater Lyttonsville
More informationCity of Lafayette Study Session Project Data
City of Lafayette Study Session Project Data For: Design Review Commission By: Michael P. Cass, Senior Planner Date: August 24, 2015 Property Address: 954 Mountain View Drive APN: 243-070-011 Zoning District:
More informationCHAPTER VIII Implementation
CHAPTER VIII Implementation VIII. Implementation The vision for the Marlboro Pike Corridor will require that a variety of participants work together to make it a reality. The following action steps outline
More informationTyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan. June 5, 2008
Tyvola & Archdale Transit Station Area Plan Second Public Meeting June 5, 2008 Presentation Outline 1. Purpose and Process 2. Station Area Overview 3. Plan Recommendations 4. Comments Received and Proposed
More informationCENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
Applicant s Name: Project Address: NEIGHBORHOOD Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable to the project. Check the box if meets guideline. Indicate
More informationPublic input has been an important part of the plan development process.
Lakewood s Comprehensive Plan recognizes that transportation helps shape the community, and that the way the community provides for the safe and efficient movement of people affects the character of the
More informationStaff Report and Recommendation
Community Planning and Development Planning Services 201 W. Colfax Ave., Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2915 f: 720.865.3052 www.denvergov.org/cpd TO: City Council Neighborhoods and Planning Committee
More information7700 College Town Drive, Suite Ninth Street, Suite 212 Sacramento, CA Sacramento, CA 95814
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS/PROJECT TEAM: Property Owners Representative: The Hodgson Company John Lambeth 7700 College Town Drive, Suite 220 1025 Ninth Street, Suite 212 Sacramento, CA 95826 Sacramento, CA 95814
More informationDRAFT Land Use Chapter
Stevens Creek Urban Village DRAFT 1 18 17 Land Use Chapter INTRODUCTION This Land Use Chapter describes how the Stevens Creek Urban Village will accommodate the growth that is planned for it in the Envision
More informationHOT SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OUTLINE
HOT SPRINGS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OUTLINE 7/28/2015 Draft outline - Hot Springs Comprehensive Plan Draft outline of topics to be discussed at public hearings and in planning sessions. Order and topics and
More informationWadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N
Wadsworth Boulevard S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N City of Lakewood Adopted November, 2006 The Vision The City of Lakewood s overall vision is to transform the area around the light rail station into a mixed-use
More information5.1 Site Plan Guidelines
5. Community Core Guidelines Development of the Community Core will take place by plan of subdivision and site plan approval. It will occur in a phased manner that will reflect the timing of residential
More informationThe University District envisions, in its neighborhood
Envisioning the University District Link Light Rail in Seattle s neighborhoods CIY OF SEALE CONCEP-LEVEL SAION AREA PLANNING RECOMMENDAION RESOLUION # 30165 EXHIBI L Vision 08.2000 he University District
More informationImplementation Guide Comprehensive Plan City of Allen
Implementation Guide 2030 Comprehensive Plan City of Allen DRAFT 2015 Implementation Guide Allen 2030 Comprehensive Plan INTRODUCTION The Comprehensive Plan serves as a guide for the growth and development
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director
More informationCPD Rules and Regulations. Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines
CPD Rules and Regulations Arapahoe Square Zoning and Design Standards/Guidelines Denver Planning Board May 4 th, 2016 Sponsor & Community Partners Sponsored by Albus Brooks, Council District 9 Developed
More informationFRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project
FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6
More informationTHE 355/270 CORRIDOR:
THE 355/270 CORRIDOR: Strategic Ideas for Sustaining a Livable Work Place Project Summary ACCESS LIFE DESIGN HEALTH WORK Montgomery County Planning Department The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning
More information4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES
4.1.3 LAND USE CATEGORIES a. City Center District The City Center District incorporates the existing character and mix of uses in downtown Belmont to encourage redevelopment and new development in keeping
More informationCreating Quality Places: Successful Communities by Design
Creating Quality Places: Successful Communities by Design Communities across the metropolitan Kansas City area are growing. Our challenge is to shape future development in ways that will maintain and enhance
More informationGold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan
Appendix F Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Transit Oriented Development (BRTOD) Helmo Station Area Plan Introduction and Purpose of the Plan The Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit facility is an eleven-mile dedicated
More informationD1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
D1 September 11, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT: BEACH MUNICIPAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION PROPERTY OWNER: SISTERS II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agriculture
More informationStatus Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February Plan for Prosperity
Status Update (2006 vs. Now) Citizen s Advisory Committee February 2018 Plan for Prosperity 2000 2017 2000 2017 Gardnerville Population 6,000 5,760 5746 5,500 5,000 5,067 5,550 5,165 5,394 5,412 5,250
More informationSteering Committee Meeting
Neighborhood Planning Initiative NPI EAST CENTRAL AREA PLAN Steering Committee Meeting November 9, 2017 6:00PM 8:00PM Tears McFarlane House East Central Area Plan Steering Committee Meeting 11/9/17 AGENDA
More informationW O R K S H O P S U M M A R Y. Community Workshop #1: Visioning September 11th, 2007
W O R K S H O P S U M M A R Y Community Workshop #1: Visioning September 11th, 2007 Upper Market Community Workshop Series and Design Plan Page 1 of 9 INTRODUCTION The Upper Market Community Workshop Series
More information280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 280 Manse Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 11, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
More informationSeptember 25th, 2018 $2000 fee pd CC
2.7267 acres 2018I-00075 September 25th, 2018 $2000 fee pd CC Rezoning Review Criteria Analysis - Map Amendment Application Number: 2018I-00075 805 W. 38 th Avenue October 19, 2018 (amd.) September 17,
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: Urbana Plan Commission FROM: Kevin Garcia, Planner II DATE: October 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Plan Case Nos. 2314-PUD-17 and
More informationCONCEPT BRIEF. 101 West Abram Street Arlington, Texas
CONCEPT BRIEF 101 West Abram Street Arlington, Texas 76010 817-459-6502 www.arlingtontx.gov/planning PD13-18 Case Number: Form must be filled out completely. Please type or legibly print all information.
More informationCity of Toronto. Emery Village Transportation Master Plan
City of Toronto Emery Village Transportation Master Plan May 2009 Emery Village Transportation Master Plan Toronto, ON May 2009 Consulting Inc. 100 York Blvd., Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 Tel:
More informationProposed Major Institution Master Plan Street Vacation. March 19, 2009
Presentation to Seattle Design Commission Proposed Major Institution Master Plan Street Vacation March 19, 2009 1 Why We Need to Grow More children surviving with chronic disease increasing the demand
More informationNeighborhood Districts
NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICTS SEVEN MAIN DISTRICTS Neighborhood Districts While the Development Plan provides a broad-scale overview of the neighborhood, this section focuses on uses and relationships at the
More informationAtlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update
Atlanta BeltLine Subarea 3 Master Plan Update April 14, 2018 Workshop Meeting 1 22 miles, connecting 45 neighborhoods 22 MILES of transit 46 MILES of streetscapes and complete streets 33 MILES of urban
More informationFrom: Mayor Sam Liccardo Councilmember Chappie Jones Councilmember Dev Davis Subject: SEE BELOW Date: June 23, 2017
CITY OF fit SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY Memorandum, To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Mayor Sam Liccardo Councilmember Chappie Jones Councilmember Dev Davis Subject: SEE BELOW Date: June
More informationA larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF.
MAP Committee Input McLoughlin Area Draft Vision Map A larger version of this map is located on the last page of this PDF. 1. The map above is intended to portray a vision for the McLoughlin area. It highlights
More informationCity Plan Commission Public Hearing
City Plan Commission Public Hearing September 20, 2016 Image Source City of Richardson Agenda Project Overview Community Input Process Key Direction from City Plan Commission and City Council Code Layout,
More informationM E M O R A N D U M November 9, 2018
M E M O R A N D U M November 9, 2018 To: Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee From: Kenneth Baker, Sr. Director of Planning and Development Services Subject: Item #8 Up to thirteen (13) residential
More informationLUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING #2 October 12, 2016 LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY AGENDA 5:00 to 5:30pm: Open House 5:30 to 6:15pm: Presentation 6:15 to 7:00pm: Individual paced workshop with
More informationBRYN MAWR. Tier 2 Characteristics: Location: Lancaster Avenue from Old Lancaster Road on the east to Norwood Avenue on the west
BRYN MAWR Tier 2 Characteristics: Transit-oriented Mixed use Along Lancaster Avenue Serve township-wide needs Civic space Employment centers Location: Lancaster Avenue from Old Lancaster Road on the east
More informationCity of Farmington. Downtown Plan. Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004
City of Farmington Amendment to the 1998 Master Plan Adopted October 11, 2004 Introduction Planning Background 1 Scope and Components of the Plan Amendment 2 Concept Introduction 3 Plan Concepts 3 Conceptual
More informationDRAFT. October Wheaton. Design Guidelines
October 2011 DRAFT Wheaton Design Guidelines 2 Draft - Design Guidelines - Wheaton Sector Plan Contents 04 Section 1: Introduction 06 Section 2: Context 08 Section 3: Design Guidelines 09 Goal 1: Create
More informationORDINANCE WHEREAS, this Ordinance is consistent with the City of Winter Garden Comprehensive Plan; and
ORDINANCE 17-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, CREATING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 118 OF THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN CODE OF ORDINANCES PROVIDING FOR THE EAST PLANT
More informationA. Background Summary of Existing Challenges and Potential Possibilities. 1. Summary of Existing Assets and Potential Opportunities
A. Background 1 A Main Street Master Plan Study was performed and completed in October of 2007. The study was initiated to review current land uses and development patterns along Main Street, from Parrish
More informationVILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT
VILLAGE OF CLEMMONS PLANNING BOARD DRAFT STAFF REPORT PETITION INFORMATION Docket # C-226 Staff Megan Ledbetter Petitioner(s) JBJH Properties, LLC Owner(s) JBJH Properties, LLC Subject Property 5892-49-1766
More informationBROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION
BROOKHILL NEIGHBORHOOD MODEL ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PREFACE TO APPLICATION June 15, 2015 Revised: August 1, 2016 I. VISION Brookhill is a proposed community based upon the principles of Albemarle County
More informationPROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GLEN ABBEY GOLF CLUB. STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY (excerpt from the Urban Design Brief) TOWN OF OAKVILLE.
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF THE GLEN ABBEY GOLF CLUB STREETSCAPE DESIGN STUDY (excerpt from the Urban Design Brief) TOWN OF OAKVILLE OCTOBER, 2016 for 2.4.2 STREETS Streets are the single largest component
More informationII. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
II. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Castle Rock is made up of numerous individually built houses and subdivision tracts that have been developed during the past century. Some of the tracts are diverse in architectural
More informationCourtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Courtice Main Street Study Community Vision Workshop PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT July 22, 2009 Tonight s Meeting 7:00 pm Introduction David Crome, Director of Planning 7:05 Presentation Stasia Bogdan,
More informationInfill Residential Design Guidelines
Infill Residential Design Guidelines Adopted March 23, 2004 Amended September 10, 2013 City of Orange Community Development Department Planning Division Phone: (714) 744-7220 Fax: (714) 744-7222 www.cityoforange.org
More informationVille de. Côte Gelée
Ville de Côte Gelée ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN GUIDELINES - DRAFT JUNE 28, 2006 Youngsville Hwy (LA Hwy 89) Youngsville Hwy (LA Hwy 89) Project Summary & Site Context Evangelline Hwy (US 90) La Neuville Road
More informationGateway commercial MIXED USE MASTER SITE PLAN. CITILAND AIrDRIE GATEWAY VENTURE INC. airdrie GATEWAY COMMERCE CENTRE. airdrie, ALBERTA FEBRUARY 2012
Gateway commercial MIXED USE MASTER SITE PLAN 1914 CENTRE STREET NORTH CALGARY, AB CANADA T2E 2S8 T. 403.264.7177 F. 403.264-7175 WWW.CITILAND.CA CITILAND AIrDRIE GATEWAY VENTURE INC. airdrie GATEWAY COMMERCE
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More informationTOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board
TOWN OF BRUDERHEIM Report to the capital region board Introduction to the Town of Bruderheim Municipal Development Plan amendment and Relation to the CRB Evaluation Criteria 02 march 2017 1 Introduction
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 TO: Chair Woollett and Members of the Design Review Committee THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Leslie Aranda Roseberry, Planning Manager Daniel Ryan,
More informationThe Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan
The Five Components of the McLoughlin Area Plan This documents contains the complete language of the five components of the McLoughlin Area Plan: The Vision Statement The Values The Guiding Principles
More informationCompleting the Vision:
Completing the Vision: North A1A-Lane Reconfiguration TDLC-Transportation Design for Liveable Communities Surf Rd. Redirection of Traffic Phase III Streetscape October 30, 2012 1 Project Overview District
More informationURBAN DESIGN BRIEF. 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road. Town of Oakville
URBAN DESIGN BRIEF 2136&2148 Trafalgar Road Town of Oakville Prepared By: METROPOLITAN CONSULTING INC For 2500674 Ontario Inc November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Introduction/Description of Subject
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Through the joint efforts of the City of Tulsa planning staff and the Land Services division of Indian Nations Council of Governments (INCOG), the Berryhill Land
More informationAnalysis of Environs of Clinton Park located at 901 W 5 th Street
Environs Definition p.1 Analysis of Environs of Clinton Park located at 901 W 5 th Street Step One Historical Significance and Context Clinton Park was identified on Searl s first survey plan for Lawrence
More informationPlanning Districts INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION To facilitate detailed examination of development prospects for all areas of the community, Delano has been divided into 14 planning districts. The location of these planning districts is
More informationHorizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element
CITY OF SUNNYVALE Horizon 2035 Land Use and Transportation Element City Council Study Session March 7, 2017 Overview General Plan Context Mixed Use Villages Transportation Mode & Parking General Plan Policy
More informationLehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Community Planning Project
Lehigh Acres Land Development Regulations Planning Effort Summary In July, 2010 Commissioner Frank Mann invited the Lehigh Acres community to start discussing how to achieve their recently adopted community
More informationCrossroads Specific Plan City of Temple City GPAC Review Draft 10/05/16
TEMPLE CITY GENERAL PLAN Crossroads Specific Plan City of Temple City GPAC Review Draft 10/05/16 Introduction... 1-3 What is a Specific Plan?... 3 Where is the Crossroads Specific Plan?... 4 Why a Specific
More informationNorth Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM
North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: November 13, 2017 TO: Members of the North Downtown Specific Plan Advisory Committee FROM: Jeanine Cavalli, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Materials for the
More informationSECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines
SECTION TWO: Overall Design Guidelines This section provides overall design principles and guidelines for the Gardnerville Mixed-use Overlay. They provide criteria for mixed-use places consisting of residential,
More informationBeachside Redevelopment Committee
Beachside Redevelopment Committee DRAFT FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS MARCH 22, 2018 This is a new slide 2 This is a new slide Table of Contents I. Introduction and Overview II. III. Community Improvements and
More informationPedestrian and Bike Bridge LOGO
6.2.2 Pedestrian and Bike Bridge The proposed pedestrian and bike crossing re-envisions the existing bridge at Pismo Creek on Cypress Street. The bridge is currently underutilized by vehicular through
More information4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY
SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 4.1 AESTHETICS AND VISUAL QUALITY This section evaluates the potential impacts to aesthetics and visual quality. Aesthetics refers to visual resources and the quality of what can
More information