Staff Report. Re: National Park Service Ferry Landing Facilities at Piers 31, 31½ and 33 Joint Meeting with BCDC Design Review Board
|
|
- Rudolph Henry
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Port of San Francisco Waterfront Design Advisory Committee Agenda Item No. 2 Meeting Date: January 22, 2018 Staff Report To: From: Waterfront Design Advisory Committee: Laura Crescimano Jeff Joslin Marsha Maytum Kathrin Moore David Winslow Dan Hodapp and Ming Yeung Re: National Park Service Ferry Landing Facilities at Piers 31, 31½ and 33 Joint Meeting with BCDC Design Review Board Project Proponents and Property Owners National Park Service ( NPS ), Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy ( Conservancy ), and Port of San Francisco ( Port, Property Owner) Prior Reviews and Management This is the second review of the proposed Project by NPS, the Conservancy, and the Port. The first review was on August 7, This review focuses on the Project proponents responses to comments from the first review. Project Description The project site is located at Piers 31, 31½, and 33, on the San Francisco waterfront, near the intersection of Bay Street, Francisco Street, and The Embarcadero. The site consists of the pier deck located between Pier 31 and Pier 33 (known as Pier 31½) and portions of the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings. The project site is currently used as a terminal for a ferry service that transports passengers between San Francisco and Alcatraz Island, which is part of NPS Golden Gate National Recreation Area. The terminal includes at the Pier 31½ pier deck, a portable ticket booth, two temporary canopies, passenger queuing areas, interpretive exhibits, limited parking for NPS vehicles, benches, and water stations. A gangway and one float accommodate two berthed ferries from Pier 31½. The Pier 33 shed building includes a restroom and operational space, and within the Pier 33 bulkhead building is the privately-operated Alcatraz Café and Grill. The Pier 31 bulkhead building is vacant. The project site is within the Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District. Visitors may reach the project site via public transit (bus, streetcar, or BART), taxi and rideshare, bicycle, personal vehicle, or walking. There is an ADA-accessible tour bus and drop-off area along The Embarcadero adjacent to the Pier 33 bulkhead building. A 2012 Visitor Flow Survey conducted by NPS found that most visitors arrive by public transportation (35 percent), walk (35 percent), or carpool (28 percent). Various paid parking lots are located in the vicinity of the project site. From The Embarcadero, visitors enter the project site between the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead buildings, approaching first the ticket booth, circulating through existing interpretive exhibits, and
2 entering a covered queuing area. A separate pre-boarding area adjacent to the gangway offers seating for passengers with disabilities. In 2016, the Pier 31½ facility served 1.76 million visitors. There were 7,007 annual ferry trips to Alcatraz Island from Pier 31½, which includes service to both Alcatraz Island and Angel Island (the Alcatraz Plus Angel Island Loop ). In addition, during peak season (June to September), the concessionaire operated 133 bay cruises from the site that were not associated with NPS operations. The number of visitors to Alcatraz Island is restricted by the NPS General Management Plan guidelines that limit seasonal service levels based, in part, on large nesting bird populations at Alcatraz Island. Ferries run from Pier 31 ½ every 30 minutes between 8:30 am and 3:30 pm, seven days a week. In addition, there are two evening departures to the island (6 pm and 6:30 pm). A typical visit to the island is approximately two hours, however visitors may remain at the island as long as they like and return on any available vessel. Although the total number of passengers per visit fluctuates throughout the day based on guest flow, the total number of visitors per scheduled departure is limited to approximately 300 passengers. Proposed Project The project would renovate an outdoor space on the Pier 31½ pier deck as well as interior space in the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings to provide an enhanced visitor experience in keeping with NPS practices. The project would also construct space for administrative and operational functions in the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings. The proposed boarding ramps and floats would support berthing of up to three ferry boats at a time. In addition to its current ferry routes, the improved terminal would provide limited ferry service for interpretive cruises of the Bay, and a new route between Pier 31½ and the Fort Baker pier (City of Sausalito). Overall, visitor demand is expected to grow in line with a general growth in tourism in the City and County of San Francisco. NPS modeling forecasts show that in 2018, 7,790 visitors could visit the primary ferry embarkation site per day, or 1.9 million visitors per year. The proposed project would remove the existing non-historic canopy structure, parking area, queuing and ticketing area, and interpretive exhibits at Pier 31½. The existing floating dock and gangway would be removed to accommodate two new floating docks and gangways. Existing uses within portions of the Pier 31 and Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings, including the Alcatraz Café and Grill, would cease, and the buildings would be reconfigured and renovated. All work would rehabilitate existing historic elements at the project site, consistent with the Secretary of the Interior s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings. The following improvements are proposed: In the Bay: 1. Expanded Berthing Facilities. An existing floating dock and gangway would be replaced with two individual docking facilities, each with an ADA-accessible gangway, float, and guide piles, to berth a total of three ferry vessels. The landside of the proposed project is characterized by the Project Proponents in three zones: Civic Plaza, Embarkation, and Disembarkation (Please see exhibit Sheet 2). At the Pier 31½ pier deck: 1. Entryway and Civic Plaza. A public plaza would be created at the center of Pier 31½, extending from the sidewalk at Herb Caen Way to the edge of the pier deck, allowing for
3 Bay views that are now partially obstructed. Stepped seating would be installed at opposite corners of the plaza to provide seating and help organize site circulation. A monument sign similar in design to those found at the Exploratorium (Piers 15/17) and the cruise terminal (Pier 27) would be installed at the Embarcadero entrance. Pedestrian-scale light poles would line the perimeter of the plaza. The plaza paving would be distinct from the remainder of the deck to define the space, along with the seating and lighting elements. 2. Primary Queuing Area. A visitor information desk would be installed near the entryway to the queuing area for ticketed passengers adjacent to the Pier 33 shed building. The queuing area would be reorganized from its current configuration, and the existing canopy structure would be replaced by a concrete canopy structure. Benches and glass panels would be used in places to delineate the queuing area. The glass panels would serve as a wind break and would include opaque or semi-transparent overlays with interpretive information. 3. Secondary Queuing Area and Café. A secondary queuing area would be provided adjacent to the Pier 31 shed building at the Bay edge. This area would incorporate seating and glass panel elements as described for the primary queuing area. The secondary queuing area would primarily serve the ferry berth used for Bay cruises and proposed service to Fort Baker. An enclosed café with food stalls and seating would be built adjacent to the secondary queue. Both the secondary queuing area and the café would be covered by a single concrete canopy structure. 4. Interpretive Exhibit Area. An interpretive exhibit area, including benches, would be created at the plaza area bound by the ticket window area, the primary queuing area, and the public restrooms in the Pier 33 shed building. At the Pier 33 bulkhead and shed buildings: 5. East Façade Improvements. New ticket windows would be installed along the east façade, and the façade would be restored, including the historic windows and removal of post-1949 additions. 6. Interior Renovations. The bulkhead building interior would be renovated to accommodate exhibits, retail, and a ticket office. The second floor would be mostly demolished except for a small area to create a mezzanine level for offices and a mechanical platform. Portions of the shed would be renovated for public restrooms, storage, and site operations. At the Pier 31 bulkhead and shed buildings: 7. Interior Renovations. A café would be constructed within a portion of the bulkhead building. Portions of the shed would be renovated to include public restrooms, public bicycle parking, disabled visitor parking (3 spaces), staff and service parking (10 spaces), and site operations. Compliance with Historic Resource Standards The project is subject to review for consistency with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties because it is within the Port of San Francisco Embarcadero Historic District, and includes alterations to Pier 31 and 33 and the adjacent marginal wharf. Piers 31, 33 and portions of the adjacent marginal wharf are contributing resources to the historic district and listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Port Commission adoption of the historic district in 2006 included policy requiring that the Secretary Standards apply to all
4 Port and Non-Port projects within the district. Because the project is also subject to environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the project sponsor retained the firm of Architectural Resources Group (ARG), Historic Preservation Consultants, who prepared an evaluation of the project for consistency with the Secretary Standards as part of the required CEQA analysis of impacts on historic resources. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Compliance NPS is seeking LEED platinum certification for the work under the system established by the US Green Building Council. Environmental Review A final Environmental Impact Statement was released by NPS in January 2017, and a July 2016 Memorandum of Understanding between NPS and the Port outlines lease terms for a future ferry concessioner and the Conservancy. CEQA review is underway and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was released on December 6, 2017 for public review and the comment period concluded on January 5, The final document is anticipated to be completed in early Prior Review Comments and Responses The WDAC and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission s Design Review Board (DRB) jointly reviewed the proposed project on August 7, At that meeting the DRB and WDAC reviewed the previous iteration of the proposed Project and provided a detailed set of comments summarized below. The project proponents have considered and incorporated these comments. The table below provides a narrative description of how the project has changed to reflect major comments from the DRB and WDAC s feedback from the August meeting. For a complete list of comments and responses see Exhibit sheet 32. DRB and WDAC Comments Comment Comment # per Exhibit sheet 32 5 The buildings along the Embarcadero orient to the tangent of the roadway. Consider a different geometry than imposing a rectangle in the middle, such as a fan shape that is more appropriate to the context and which would allow a more open interpretation of the view. The parti is appreciated, but a consideration of the plaza shape would be appreciated. 15 Concerned about the "rock" icon. May not be understood and appear odd. Appropriateness of only placing one rock on the site. Response Other geometries were considered and eliminated earlier in the design process. The current geometry situates the plaza perpendicular to the dominant tangent of the Embarcadero and in relationship to the adjacent finger piers and historic shed buildings. Please see sheet 24 for more detail. The use of the rock has been abandoned. 18 The rock will invite children and others to climb on it. Consider incorporating this further into the overall design. 17 The same design experience of the plaza should carry through to the in- The NPS and Port will require the future ferry service concessioner to design the ramps, docks,
5 water connections to the ferries. 19 Are the ferry facilities part of the project? (not described in the presentation) 17 Encourage materials and other clues to draw visitors to the water's edge. and floats to meet performance specifications, subject to Port review and approval. This approach will enable fair competition among parties interested in the future ferry concession that may have differing vessels and operating needs. The railings are designed with open fields to allow visitors to view the water and will incorporate interpretive elements that will attract visitors interest. Please see sheets 6 and 28 for more detailed information on integration of interpretation and selection of materials. Also the large fixed seating feature in the Civic Plaza draws visitors to the water s edge and encourages them to linger. Please see sheet 16, 23, and 24 for more details and illustrations. 19 Think more about how the empty spaces could be used. Create a balance that is perhaps temporary and adaptable between the current cluttered location and the proposed design, which is perhaps too sparse. 20 How could the central empty space be used, think about how the site could provide more furnishings. 23 Consider another material besides concrete for the shear walls. 24 Are there other ways to accomplish the job of the shear walls such as bracing 26 How will the wayfinding for the two different ferry services be defined? 28 The facades on Piers 31 and 33 can help amplify the sense of arrival. Provide further views and narrative to what is this experience. 29 Anticipate what modifications to the terminal may be necessary over time because future modifications could diminish the integrity of the overall design. 29 Think of all the future site adjustments that could occur and include them now. The central civic plaza serves as a welcome mat inviting visitors into the site and providing generous circulation for the high volume of visitors. The current design includes significant additional seating and the appropriate mix of fixed and movable site furnishings that help to activate spaces, define boundaries, and provide opportunities for plantings. Please see sheets 25-28, 31 for more details and illustrations. Other materials and methods were considered and abandoned earlier in the design process. In the current design the concrete shear walls help to define the entry to the queuing areas and the outdoor cafe. Please sheets for illustrations. Each ferry queue includes an A/V (LED) display to show intended destination and may also display interpretive information/ imagery. Please see sheets 7 and 9 for more details. Treatment of the facades is consistent with Port policy for the Embarcadero and the Secretary of Interior s Standards for Historic Properties. Please see sheets 21 and 22 for illustrations. The design team has done all that it can at this time to anticipate future site adjustments and modifications. The current design reflects a 15-year design horizon which is consistent with the next ferry service concession. Once a concessioner is selected the design will advance and may require refinements which could be accommodated due to the flexibility of the current design. The Team is dedicated to continuing to work with skillful, highlyqualified designers to ensure the same high quality of design and materials are reflected in any future refinements.
6 Committee Review of the Project The WDAC reviews Port Projects to ensure that they are consistent with policies and design criteria set forth in the Design & Access Element of the Port s Waterfront Land Use Plan. Below are policies and criteria in the Design & Access Element that apply to the proposed project. Page 31, Commercial Facilities Within and Adjacent to Public Access and Open Space - Design public access so that the user is not intimidated nor is the user s appreciation restricted by structures or incompatible uses. Allow accessory commercial activities (e.g. food and beverage services, bike or skate rentals, ferry queuing) within open space and public access areas after maintaining adequate pedestrian circulation and minimizing blockage of the waterfront edge. Allow adjacent commercial uses (e.g. restaurants) to spill out onto public access and open space areas. Clearly delineate adjacent commercial use areas from public use areas with signs, planting, fences, elevation changes, or other distinguishing characteristics. The public access areas allow visitors to reach and travel along the Bay edge. Commercial functions of the project are located inside the bulkheads and where outside they are located out of the most obvious circulation corridors and in the view shadow of the Pier 31 bulkhead. Historic Resource Policies Page 51, Preservation Preserve and adaptively reuse significant historic resources where feasible. The Project would rehabilitate the Embarcadero wall of the Pier 33 bulkhead with a new and enlarged entry to match the original, but currently covered opening. The side wall of the Pier 33 bulkhead and the wall facing the Pier 31½ wharf would be renovated with windows consistent with the original improvements. The project would also include improvements within the Pier 33 shed including installing curtain wall storefronts immediately inside the location of the roll-up doors adjacent to the wharf area. The roll-up doors would be retained in an up position and interior improvements would feature views of the shed roof and structural elements by installing glass above first level partitions. The Pier 31 bulkhead would be renovated to a single full height space exposing its structural elements. Similar to Pier Shed 33, Pier Shed 31 would receive new public restrooms, storefronts and other operational space. All improvements would be evaluated for compliance with the Secretary s Standards as described above. Page 51, Waterfront Character Require development of the waterfront to be compatible with historic resources. All proposed improvements are required to be consistent with the Secretary s Standards. The WDAC should evaluate the new queuing and ticketing canopy and other visitor amenities to determine if they are architecturally compatible with the existing historic resources while also clearly differentiated from them. Page 55, Bulkhead Buildings and Piers Sheds Retain and reuse the historic bulkhead buildings and pier sheds at Piers 9, 15, 31, 33, The Project plans include retaining and reusing Pier 33, the shed and bulkhead building, consistent with the Secretary s Standards as described above. Page 61, Industrial Maritime Character The architectural character of pier development should respect, but not mimic, the historic industrial/maritime character of the waterfront.
7 Waterfront Design Advisory Committee NPS Alcatraz Ferry Landing Facilities at Piers 31, 31½ and 33 January 22, 2018 The Pier 33 historic shed would retain its industrial/maritime character. WDAC members should evaluate the proposed new queuing and ticketing canopy structure to determine conformance with this policy. Page 61, Historic Preservation Retain and reuse the historic piers and pier sheds. The Project plans include retaining and reusing the Pier 33 shed and bulkhead building and the wharf area consistent with the Secretary s Standards as described above. Page 84, Transparency Maximize transparency of pier edges facing adjacent open spaces, to the extent compatible with maritime uses. The Pier 33 roll-up doors would be retained in an up position with new curtain wall storefronts installed to allow views from the shed to the wharf area. In addition, the new concrete canopies over the embarkation and post-tour areas are designed with gently sloping roofs to maximize views below the roofs of the historic pier sheds and of the Bay. Page 84, Open Space Pier 31½ Create a public access area within the pier (wharf) which maintains a view corridor between the Pier 31 and 33 bulkhead buildings to the Bay. The project removes the ticket structure and other site improvements currently within the central (view) corridor and places only low seating structures within this space. Also, the canopies are designed to maximize views as described above. Weather protection for diners is located in the view shadow of the Pier 31 bulkhead and an information kiosk is located in the view shadow of the Pier 33 bulkhead. P:\Planning\Waterfront Design Advisory Committee\Projects\Pier 31-5 Alcatraz\NPS Alcatraz_ doc 7
PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO WATERFRONT PLAN UPDATE: PART 3
Waterfront Planning Timeline WHAT IS THE PORT? The Port of San Francisco manages 7½ miles of the San Francisco waterfront from Fisherman s Wharf in the north to Heron s Head Park in the south. Port properties
More informationBenches Trash & Recycling Containers Railings and Bullrail Edges Paving Planting Pier Apron Lighting Interpretive Signage
130 Appendix C: PortWalk The PortWalk give guidance for improvements within the Port s public access and open space system to ensure a certain standard of design consistency while preserving opportunities
More informationM i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t
114 M i s s i o n B a y W a t e r f r o n t Character of the Area: The Mission Bay Waterfront extends from Pier 48 at China Basin Channel to 18th Street in the Central Basin. This area of the waterfront
More informationNotice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report and Public Scoping Meeting for the Alameda Shipways Residential Project
Notice of Preparation (NOP) of an Environmental Impact Report and Public Scoping Meeting for the Notice is hereby given that the City of Alameda, Lead Agency, will prepare an Environmental Impact Report
More informationThis Review Is Divided Into Two Phases:
Semiahmoo Town Centre Review The purpose of this review: To review the Semiahmoo Town Centre Concept Plan, originally approved in 1993, to ensure that this centre will continue to serve the needs of South
More informationCENTRAL ESTUARY PLAN AVISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT
Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment Presentation to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission December 9, 2009 This Afternoon s Presentation
More informationPORT OF SAN FRANCISCO
PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO WATERFRONT LAND USE PLAN Prop H (1990) required a Waterfront Land Use Plan Port property in BCDC jurisdiction Define Acceptable Uses Hotels prohibited on piers Prioritize Maritime
More informationDESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM AGENDA DATE: AUGUST 2, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: SUBJECT: Chair Imboden and Members of the Design Review Committee Anna Pehoushek, Assistant Community Development Director
More informationFLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist
FLORIN ROAD CORRIDOR Site Plan and Design Review Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for all guidelines applicable
More informationFifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee. DOWNTOWN Street Design
1 Fifth and Detroit Street Design May 2017 Capital Improvements Committee Agenda 2 Review Street Configuration Prior Meeting Review Outreach Synopsis Functional Street Design Refinements Curb Edge, Turning
More information1. Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Parks Community Parks Special Use Sites 2. Open Space 3. Trails
Appendix A: Park Classifications The intent of parks and recreation classifications is to aid in making acquisition and design decisions for park sites, facilities and the organization of recreation space
More informationPhilip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Acting Planning and Capital Program Director
Date: March 7, 2018 To: Through: From: Subject: Recreation and Park Commission Capital Committee Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Acting Planning and Capital Program Director Dan Mauer,
More informationWEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
WEST LOOP DESIGN GUIDELINES CHECKLIST Section 1.0 General Strategies 1.1 DESIGN EXCELLENCE: ENCOURAGE HIGH QUALITY AND INNOVATIVE DESIGN OF NEW BUILDINGS WITHIN THE WEST LOOP WITHOUT BEING PRESCRIPTIVE
More informationpreliminary master plan Cover Slide executive summary public presentation
preliminary master plan public presentation executive summary Cover Slide {agenda} + Master Plan Process + Context and Overviews + Preliminary Concepts - Entry/Gateways - Core District - Streetscape +
More informationA L F O N S O A R C H I T E C T S
A L F O N S O A R C H I T E C T S A L M A T H E P I E R O F S T. P E T E R S B U R G A L F ALFONSO O N S O A R ARCHITECTS C H I T E C T S ALMA 1. Please demonstrate how the project fits within the Pinellas
More informationVILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use
VILLAGE OF SKOKIE Design Guidelines for Mixed-Use Districts NX Neighborhood Mixed-Use TX Transit Mixed-Use CX Core Mixed-Use TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITE DESIGN Purpose 1 CHAPTER 2 SITE DESIGN Streetscape
More informationHarmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending, Project Development Plan/Final Development Plan - FDP #130021
ITEM NO FDP #130021 MEETING DATE July 23, 2013 STAFF Pete Wray ADMINISTRATIVE TYPE I HEARING STAFF REPORT PROJECT: APPLICANT: OWNER: Harmony Technology Park Third Filing, Second Replat Custom Blending,
More informationR STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist
R STREET CORRIDOR NEIGHBORHOOD Site Plan and Design Review Supplemental Guidelines Checklist Applicant s Name: Project Address: Phone: Email: Applicant shall fill out the design guidelines checklist for
More informationLUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING #2 October 12, 2016 LUNDY S LANE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN STUDY AGENDA 5:00 to 5:30pm: Open House 5:30 to 6:15pm: Presentation 6:15 to 7:00pm: Individual paced workshop with
More informationPORT OF VANCOUVER WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT. Concept Development Plan City Center Redevelopment Authority April 20, 2017
PORT OF VANCOUVER WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT Concept Development Plan City Center Redevelopment Authority April 20, 2017 Port History PORT ESTABLISHED 1912 TERMINAL 1 ACQUIRED 1925 GWM SIGNS LEASE 1935 HARBOR
More informationCourthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study. Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014
Courthouse Square Planning & Urban Design Study Courthouse Square Working Group #13 October 15, 2014 1 Courthouse Square Process Working Group Community Courthouse Square Advisory Groups & Civic Associations
More informationNorth Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM
North Downtown Specific Plan MEMORANDUM MEETING DATE: November 13, 2017 TO: Members of the North Downtown Specific Plan Advisory Committee FROM: Jeanine Cavalli, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Materials for the
More information8implementation. strategies
PROGRAM STRATEGIES 8implementation strategies T he implementation actions of this chapter are designed to support and carry out the land use, economic development, transportation, urban design, and program
More informationFRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project
FRUITVALE TRANSIT VILLAGE (Phase 2) Residential Project DEVELOPER: SIGNATURE PROPERTIES ARCHITECT: HKIT ARCHITECTS April 23, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 Vision 4 Description of Site 5 Guiding Concepts 6
More informationVision for East Cowes
Vision for East Cowes A better East Cowes for now and the future The East Cowes Regeneration project is a major regeneration scheme on the Isle of Wight. It will create a vibrant community with a long-term
More informationSubject: Expo Light Rail - Revision of the Terminus Station North Entrance Design
Information Item Date: June 12, 2012 To: Mayor and City Council From: David Martin, Director, Planning & Community Development Martin Pastucha, Director, Public Works Kathryn Vernez, Deputy City Manager
More informationPolicies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center
Policies and Code Intent Sections Related to Town Center The Town Center Vision is scattered throughout the Comprehensive Plan, development code and the 1994 Town Center Plan. What follows are sections
More informationFisherman s Wharf Public Realm Plan
Fisherman s Wharf Public Realm Plan SPUR Presentation July 11, 2008 3 February 2010 WHY A PUBLIC REALM PLAN? Public Life 1900 1950 1965 2000 Mainstreet Copenhagen in 100 years From nessesary to optional
More informationMaster Plan Implementation Committee Meeting
MILTON VILLAGE ZONING AND WATERFRONT STUDY Master Plan Implementation Committee Meeting February 12, 2018 7:00-9:00 pm IMAGE: GOOGLE COMPILED MEETING FEEDBACK/SURVEY RESULTS Waterfront Principles - Prioritized
More informationPORT WHITBY COMMUNITY
PORT WHITBY COMMUNITY SECONDARY PLAN UPDATE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES September 2015 DRAFT PROPOSED AMENDMENT NUMBER # to the Whitby Official Plan PURPOSE: The intent of this Amendment
More informationHonorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and Development
Office of the City Manager ACTION CALENDAR January 29, 2013 To: From: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Christine Daniel, City Manager Submitted by: Eric Angstadt, Director, Planning and
More informationLos Angeles Harbor Commission Approves a New Wilmington Waterfront
At the Port of Los Angeles Los Angeles Harbor Commission Approves a New Wilmington Waterfront In June, the Los Angeles Harbor Commission approved the Wilmington Waterfront Development Project. The project
More information- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING
- INVITATION - COURTESY INFORMATIONAL MEETING Hosted by the Property Owner and Project Developer CAMELLIA COURT DEVELOPMENT WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25, 2017, 7:00 9:00 P.M. BLOY CENTER 1441 S. BENITO AVE, ALHAMBRA,
More informationTable of Contents. Elm Avenue Improvement Plan City of Waco, Texas. Introduction 1. Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2.
Table of Contents Introduction 1 Existing Context 1 Figure 1 2 Plan Guidelines 3 Future Urban Form 4 The West-End 4 Main Street 6 The East-End 7 Figure 2 9 Public Improvement Recommendations 7 General
More informationTown Center Design Guidelines
Adopted by City Council on September 18, 2018 Design Theme The Draper Town Center Design Theme is defined as encompassing those architectural design styles that were prevalent in the construction of civic
More informationSFMTA PHELAN LOOP AND PUBLIC PLAZA PHELAN OCEAN AVENUE
SFMTA Municipal Transportation Agency Image: a bus in front of the Palace of the Legion of honor SFMTA PHELAN LOOP AND PUBLIC PLAZA PHELAN AVENUE @ OCEAN AVENUE Community Meeting May 23, 2012 San Francisco,
More informationDesign Considerations
Essential to the development of a successful Master Plan for the Park Complex is input from the community that the park will serve. The community outreach component of the planning process included numerous
More informationDowntown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board
Agenda Item 5 CONDITIONAL USE DEV2014-095 Pai in the Sky Downtown / Ballough Road Redevelopment Board Staff Report TO: Downtown / Ballough Road Board Members FROM: Jason Jeffries, Project Manager DATE:
More informationGeorge Hotel application STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 14, 2014
George Hotel application STAFF REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE JANUARY 14, 2014 1 Presentation outline Purpose: to seek Council direction for next steps in the review process Application process to date
More information4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT:
. 4 January 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MID-ATLANTIC AUTO PROPERTY OWNER: DZR, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (truck rental, automobile service, and automotive/bulk
More informationDowntown Waterfront Municipal Harbor Plan Advisory Committee
Downtown Waterfront Municipal Harbor Plan Advisory Committee Waterfront Activation and Programming Subcommittee November 1, 2013 1 Our Process 1. Solicit Ideas and Public Input a. Through charrettes Charrette
More informationTown Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan)
Town Center (part of the Comprehensive Plan) Mercer Island Town Center Looking North (2014) In 1994, a year-long process culminated in a set of design guidelines and code requirements for the Town Center
More informationCHAPTER 3. Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Industrial, Recreational and Institutional Uses
CHAPTER 3 Design Standards for Business, Commercial, Section Number Title Ordinance Number Date of Ordinance 16-3-1 Applicability 2006-11 2008-04 07-01-08 16-3-2 Uniform Standards for Architectural Design
More informationMARINA MARKET & WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT STUDY PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS
MARINA MARKET & WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT STUDY PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS FEBRUARY 2015 PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REGIONAL POSITIONING SITE IMPRESSIONS PLANNING & DESIGN PRINCIPLES EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
More informationSOUTH UNIVERSITY Street Design Alternatives in Progress
1 Alternatives in Progress 2016.01.20 Meeting Agenda 2 1. Progress & Schedule 2. Utilizing the Street Design Manual 3. Site Characteristics and Input Received 4. Street Geometry What can we accomplish
More informationCommunity Engagement Committee Meeting #1 December 10, :30pm-8:30pm
Community Engagement Committee Meeting #1 December 10, 2014 6:30pm-8:30pm Welcome and Introductions Dana Murdoch Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Project Manager Ryan French Walker Art Center Director
More informationCENTERS AND CORRIDORS
INITIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES for CENTERS AND CORRIDORS City of Spokane Planning Services Third Floor, City Hall 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd. Spokane, WA 99201-3329 (509) 625-6300 www.spokaneplanning.org
More informationViews from the Bridge
Chapter 2 Views from the Bridge Alternative 2A would primarily have adverse visual impacts to views from the Bridge, with the exception of a strongly adverse visual impact from Viewpoint 11 (Car View East)
More informationWINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES
WINDSOR GLEN DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted by Council, 2006 WINDSOR GLEN REDEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES August 2006 1.0 Master Plan Organization For this area of the Coquitlam Town Centre, a mix of high,
More informationSF REC & PARK STANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENT. Supervisor London Breed District 5. Project Manager Dan Mauer Recreation and Parks Department
SF REC & PARK STANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENT COMMUNITY MEETING #3 THURSDAY, JANUARY 25 TH, 2018 Supervisor London Breed District 5 Project Manager Dan Mauer Recreation and Parks Department Design Team William
More informationPIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE. October 19, 2017
PIKE PINE RENAISSANCE: ACT ONE October 19, 2017 WATERFRONT SEATTLE PROGRAM PROJECT INTRODUCTION Pike and Pine streets, between First and Melrose avenues Pedestrian and streetscape improvements Budget:
More informationDyersville Downtown Plan. Open House October 24, 2017
Dyersville Downtown Plan Open House October 24, 2017 What is a Comprehensive Plan? - Vision - Guidance for decisions - Basis for regulations What is a Downtown Plan? - Understand priorities - Identify
More informationPHASE 3-4 PARKS SOUTH PARK AND CHANNEL PARK
PHASE 3-4 PARKS SOUTH PARK AND CHANNEL PARK Sheet List L1.0 L2.0 L3.0 L4.0 L5.0 L6.0 L7.0 L8.0 L9.0 L10.0 L11.0 L12.0 L13.0 L14.0 L15.0 L16.0 L17.0 L18.0 L19.0 L20.0 L21.0 L22.0 Cover Open Space Context
More informationMeeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014.
Meeting Display Boards for Public Hearing on the Wilson Transfer Station Project held Tuesday, February 18, 2014. Board 1: Welcome Welcome to the Wilson Transfer Station Project Public Hearing. The purpose
More informationUrban Design Manual 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES. Background. Urban Design Challenges
222221 2.0 DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES Background In recent years, drive-through facilities have grown significantly in popularity with drive-through restaurants, in particular, being established on numerous
More informationPhase I Redevelopment Plan. First Community Meeting
Hoboken Terminal and Yard Phase I Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting May 31, 2011 One Hudson Place Phase I Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment Plan First Community Meeting Agenda 1. Redevelopment
More informationFuture Proposed Development
Future Proposed Development on and around Link light rail s Capitol Hill Station Meeting September 24, 2012 Tonight s Agenda 6:00 pm Open House 6:30 pm Introductions Richard Conlin, City of Seattle Councilmember/Sound
More informationCITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY OF MERCER ISLAND DESIGN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item: 2 March 9, 2011 Project: Description: Applicant: DSR11-004 The applicant is requesting approval to replace the existing exterior wood framed
More informationFREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT
FREEWAY/TOURIST DISTRICT DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE March, 2014 MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FREEWAY/TOURIST DESIGN STANDARDS March, 2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...1 Design Site Design
More informationSubject: 30 Otis Street, Evaluation of Shadow on Proposed 11th and Natoma Park
Date: September 5, 2018 To: Recreation and Park Commission Capital Committee Through: Philip A. Ginsburg, General Manager Toks Ajike, Director, Capital & Planning Division From: Brian Stokle, Planner,
More informationGUIDELINES EXHIBITION PLACE LOCATION: OBJECTIVES. Structure Plan URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Development in the Exhibition Place lands will be consistent with the following urban design guidelines. They provide a framework for new development of the lands and are to be read in conjunction with
More informationTOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION
Workshop #3 TOWN COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION January 20, 2011 Consultant Team In Attendance Tonight BMS Design Group Nevada City and San Francisco Michael Smiley, AICP, ASLA Partner-in-Charge Nancy L.
More informationMcDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville Town of Purcellville Special Use Permit Statement of Justification July 24, 2014
Introduction / Written Statement McDonald s Restaurant - Purcellville McDonald s Corporation is proposing to redevelop the existing McDonald s eating establishment with a drive-through located at 121 N
More informationVANCOUVER CONVENTION CENTRE EXPANSION PROJECT (VCCEP) SUPPLEMENTARY BULLETIN: * WATER-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
City of Vancouver Planning - By-law Administration Bulletins Community Services, 453 W. 12th Ave Vancouver, BC V5Y 1V4 F 604.873.7344 fax 604.873.7060 planning@vancouver.ca VANCOUVER CONVENTION CENTRE
More informationCHAPTER 3 GENERAL LAND USE POLICIES 39
CHAPTER 3 GENERAL LAND USE POLICIES 39 Regulatory and Policy Context for this Plan 40 Maritime Uses 48 Open Spaces and Public Access 56 Residential Uses 61 Commercial Uses 62 Other Uses 70 Interim Uses
More informationWELCOME and introduction
1 WELCOME and introduction Mobility Hub Locations within Burlington STUDY OVERVIEW STUDY OBJECTIVES The City of Burlington is developing four Area Specific Plans, one for each of Burlington s Mobility
More informationAMEND DMENT H HOSPITAL
AMEND DMENT TO LAND USE PLAN ELEMENT VILLAGE OF RIDGEWOOD MASTER PLAN H HOSPITAL ZONE DISTRICT Village of Ridgewood Planning Board February 28, 2014with technical revisions from June 9, 2014 Planning Board
More informationMixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines
1 Mixed Use Centres Development Permit Guidelines Area Commercial or Mixed Use development occurring in City Centre, Urban Centre, Neighbourhood Centre, or Institutional Complex land use designations is
More informationF. Driveways. Driveways which provide access to off-street parking or loading from public streets shall comply with the following:
Section 20.945.040 General Design Standards for Surface Parking Areas. A. Review Authority. Parking lot design and drainage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Transportation Manager. B.
More informationBuildings may be set back to create small plazas provided that these setbacks do not substantially disrupt the street wall s continuity.
6-22 Community Design Street Walls and Street-front Setbacks The siting of buildings will play a critical role in establishing the character and sense of place for the District. Siting buildings at the
More informationd Escoto, M. City of Chicago Streetscape and Urban Design Program, Chicago Department of Transportation. (2003). Streetscape Guidelines.
WORKS CITED McCann, B., & Rynne, S. Planning Advisory Service, (n.d.). Complete streets: Best policies and implementation strategies (559). Retrieved from American Planning Association website: http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents/cs/resources/cs-bestpractices-chapter5.pdf
More informationSUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA
1 SUBCHAPTER 4-B GUIDELINES FOR THE B-3 COMMERCIAL CHARACTER AREA Downtown Bozeman should be the location of buildings of greatest height and intensity in the community. The following guidelines apply
More informationMIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT
MIXED-USE VILLAGE OVERLAY FLOATING DISTRICT Zoning regulations developed by committee to the Planning Board for the Town of DeWitt, NY Issue date: 13 July 2017 revised 3/12/2018, revised 4/26/2018, 5/9/2018
More informationEMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
EMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Date: Report Date: April 19, 2012 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Planning and Building Department Miroo Desai, Senior Planner (ECCL) (UPDR12-001)
More informationNew Westminster Downtown Parking Strategy Public Open House #1 September 13, 2012
New Westminster Downtown Parking Strategy Public Open House #1 September 13, 2012 The City is preparing a strategy for parking in Downtown New Westminster. The study team and a group of key stakeholders
More informationUrban Design Manual PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction. Station Study Areas
111111 PLANNING AROUND RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS (PARTS) Introduction The ION rapid transit system will link Waterloo, Kitchener and Cambridge through a central transit corridor (CTC). There are a number
More informationCommunity Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)
18.28.500 Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) The Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU) are intended to help implement the land use goals and strategies found in the Golden Vision 2030 values,
More informationSIMPLOT OFFICE BUILDING
SIMPLOT OFFICE BUILDING 1) Urban Context and conformance with the River Myrtle Masterplan The proposed project is part of a larger development on the block between 9th and 11th, and Myrtle and Front Street.By
More information~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO
~o counr~, ~P'~'~; SAN FRANCISCO ~'.~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT a 2 757 O~~~S 0 Case No.: Project Address: Zoning: Certificate of Determination COMMUNITY PLAN EVALUATION UMU (Urban Mixed Use) District 58-X Height
More informationVisual and Aesthetics
Such a connection could accommodate timed transfers and improve connections between local transit service and Presidio Shuttle service. Level of Service The results of the analysis are provided on a route-by-route
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 21A.46.120 Proposal to Create a Localized Alternative Sign Overlay for Library Square Case # 25 April 2012 Planning and Zoning Division Department
More informationB L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development
B L A C K D I A M O N D D E S I G N G U I D E L I N E S for Multi-family Development Adopted June 18, 2009 This section of the Design and focuses on site planning and design guidance for new multi-family
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORTH VANCOUVER Meeting of the Held at City Hall, 141 West 14th Street, North Vancouver, B.C. in Conference Room A on Wednesday, July 20,2005 M I N U T E S Present: Staff:
More informationSouth th E ast Communit ity Centre (SECC)
South East Community Centre (SECC) 1 New Park Design & Community Centre Update Thursday, February 8, 2018 Public Open House Thank you for attending this Open House! The town and the Consulting Team will
More informationDivision VI Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards
Division VI 18.40.800 Community Mixed Use (CMU) Architectural Guidelines and Standards 18.40.810 Guidelines The goals of the Comprehensive Plan include a focus on pedestrian safety, amenities and aesthetics
More informationV. Gateways GATEWAYS / V-1
V. GATEWAYS / V-1 Many of Chesapeake s gateways are located on highways and call for bold and attractive designs that motorists can understand, appreciate, and enjoy. can also take the form of natural
More information4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines
4.9 Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan Design Guidelines The Mendocino Avenue Corridor Plan addresses the area between College Avenue and Steele Lane. Mendocino Avenue is a busy arterial that runs parallel
More informationBayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines
Bayshore Boulevard Home Improvement District Design Guidelines guidelines for New construction projects and major alterations IN the bayshore boulevard home improvement special use DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO
More informationEmerson Park Master Plan Update. Public Meeting III August 27, 2014
Emerson Park Master Plan Update Public Meeting III August 27, 2014 Meeting Agenda: Project Update Presentation of Master Plan Components Discussion and Feedback The Path Forward: Building on the Concept
More informationSTAFF BRIEF. Project: 2016-COA-356 Meeting: September 8, th Street Oxford Hotel
Community Planning and Development Denver Landmark Preservation 20 West Colfax, Dept. 205 p: (720)-865-2709 f: (720)-865-3050 www.denvergov.org/preservation STAFF BRIEF E-Mail: landmark@denvergov.org This
More information1.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION THEME 1: PUTTING TRANSIT AT THE CENTRE OF COMMUNITIES. Fully integrate transit with community design
TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION TRANSIT VISION 2040 defines a future in which public transit maximizes its contribution to quality of life with benefits that support a vibrant and equitable society,
More informationThe University District envisions, in its neighborhood
Envisioning the University District Link Light Rail in Seattle s neighborhoods CIY OF SEALE CONCEP-LEVEL SAION AREA PLANNING RECOMMENDAION RESOLUION # 30165 EXHIBI L Vision 08.2000 he University District
More informationOfficial Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)
District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 4360, 2004, Amendment Bylaw No. 4897, 2016 (Sewell s Landing) Effective Date: 1089612v1 District of West Vancouver Official Community Plan Bylaw
More informationHighland Falls Waterfront Redevelopment Feasibility Study Village Board Meeting March 20, 2017
Village Board Meeting March 20, 2017 Agenda I. Public Meeting #1 Visioning Summary II. Public Meeting #2 Comment Summary III. IV. IV. Case Study: Milton Train Station Schematic Design Concepts Schedule/Next
More information5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING
5.2 LAND USE AND ZONING This section describes the land use and zoning of the project site and surrounding area, followed by an analysis of the potential for incompatibility or adverse impact on prevailing
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.3 DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Approving the removal of Municipal Railway bus zones at various
More informationCreating an integrated waterfront. Recommendations
Creating an integrated waterfront Recommendations Railway Square Post Office + Shell Station Post Office Square Civic Square Ilot Green Wakefield St Wakefield St (Tory Cars) Wakefield St (New World Supermarket)
More informationNorth Oakville East Parks Facilities Distribution Plan. November, 2009
North Oakville East November, 2009 POLICY CONTEXT 1) Purpose a) The purpose of this document is to be a guide for the location, configuration, design and development of the parks system for the North Oakville
More informationGoal 1: To Encourage the Orderly, Harmonious and Judicious Use of University Resources in the Development of University Land.
2.0 Future Land Use Goal 1: To Encourage the Orderly, Harmonious and Judicious Use of University Resources in the Development of University Land. Objective 1.1: Make available future building sites that
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of March 20, 2007 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT #2 Additional and Revised Information DATE: March 20, 2007 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise Public Hearings
More information