IV. Environmental Impact Analysis J.4 Public Services Parks and Recreation

Transcription

1 IV. Environmental Impact Analysis J.4 Public Services Parks and Recreation 1. Introduction This section analyzes the potential impacts of the proposed project on parks and recreational facilities. The analysis identifies the existing parks and recreational facilities in the project vicinity and determines whether they can accommodate the growth generated by the project. The analysis also evaluates the proposed project s provisions for recreational facilities and open space relative to applicable City goals and regulatory requirements. Information regarding parks and recreational facilities surrounding the project site was provided in part by the Department of Recreation and Parks (DRP). This section is based in part on information provided by the DRP included in Appendix K-1 of this Draft EIR. 2. Environmental Setting a. Existing Conditions (1) Local Area The Department of Recreation and Parks is responsible for the provision, operation, and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities in the project vicinity. Currently, the DRP maintains and operates more than 390 sites for recreational use including: 180 recreation centers, 59 swimming pools, 13 municipal golf courses, nine lakes, seven camps (both within and outside of City limits), more than a dozen museums and historic sites, and hundreds of programs for youth, seniors, the physically disabled, and volunteers. The DRP also administers more than 15,600 acres of parkland, including 4,217 acres in Griffith Park, one of the largest municipal parks within the boundaries of an American city. 90 As of 2008 (the existing conditions year for the project), the City of Los Angeles as well as the Boyle Heights Community Plan Area, within which the project site is 90 Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, Who We Are, accessed August 2, Page IV.J-80

2 located, both had a park ratio of 0.70 acre of neighborhood and community parkland per 1,000 residents. 91 (Further discussion of parkland ratios is provided below.) The project site is located in the Metro Region of the DRP s jurisdiction. Several park and recreational facilities are located within a 2-mile radius of the project site. 92 As shown in Figure IV.J-4 on page IV.J-82, these park and recreational facilities include the following: 93 Lou Costello Recreation Center, located immediately southeast of the project site at 3141 East Olympic Boulevard, includes Costello Pool, the Costello Senior Citizen Center, and Hostetter Playground, as well as various ball courts and fields, a gymnasium, picnic area, auditorium, and community room. Monseignor Ramon Garcia Recreation Center (formerly Fresno Park Recreation Center), a 7.26-acre neighborhood facility located at 1016 South Fresno Street, approximately 0.25 mile northeast of the project site, which includes ball courts, a gymnasium, playground, picnic area, auditorium, and community room. Boyle Heights Sports Center, an 8.20-acre neighborhood park located at 933 South Mott Street, approximately 0.32 mile north of the project site, which includes a ball field and courts, a playground, picnic area, and community room. Hollenbeck Park and Recreation Center, Skate Park, and Lake, a acre community facility located at 415 South Saint Louis Street, approximately 0.70 mile north of the project site. This facility includes ball courts, a gymnasium, playground, picnic area, auditorium, and community room. Evergreen Recreation Center and Childcare Center, a 6.45-acre community facility located at 2839 East 4th Street, approximately 0.96 mile northeast of the project site, which includes ball courts, a gymnasium, playground, picnic area, auditorium, and community room. Ross Valencia Pocket Park, a 0.08-acre pocket park located at East 1st Street and Chicago Street, approximately 1.19 miles north of the project site. 91 Written communication, Jon Kirk Mukri and Michael Shull, Department of Recreation and Parks, July 18, Distances listed for each park are approximate driving distances. 93 Written communication, Jon Kirk Mukri and Michael Shull, Department of Recreation and Parks, July 18, 2008; and the Department of Recreation and Parks website, accessed May 11, Page IV.J-81

3 Page IV.J-82 BROADWAY BROADWAY ST ST ALAMEDA ST 6TH ST 7TH ST 1ST ST 7 4TH ST SOTO ST WHITTIER BLVD 2 WABASH AVE 5 60 EVERGREEN AVE AVE EAST CESAR CHAVEZ AVE 3RD ST Lou Costello Recreation Center 3141 East Olympic Boulevard Monseignor Ramon Garcia Recreation Center 1016 South Fresno Street Boyle Heights Sports Center 933 South Mott Street Hollenbeck Park and Recreation Center, Skate Park, and Lake 415 South Saint Louis Street Evergreen Recreation Center and Childcare Center 2839 East 4th Street Ross Valencia Pocket Park East 1st Street & Chicago Street Pecan Recreation Center 127 South Pecan Street 10 PROJECT SITE 1 8 Prospect Park 612 North Echandia Street 9 State Street Recreation Center 716 North State Street 10 Wabash Recreation Center 2765 Wabash Avenue Ross Snyder Recreation Center 1501 East 41st Street 710 Source: Google Earth Pro, 2010; Matrix Environmental, N Mile Approximate Scale in Miles Boyle Heights Mixed Use Community Project Figure IV.J-4 Locations of Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities in the Vicinity of the Project Site

4 Pecan Recreation Center, a 4.28-acre neighborhood park located at 127 South Pecan Street, approximately 1.36 miles northwest of the project site, includes Pecan Park Pool, several ball courts, a playground, gymnasium, picnic area, and community room. Prospect Park, a 2.68-acre neighborhood park located at 612 North Echandia Street, approximately 1.75 miles north of the project site, includes a playground. State Street Recreation Center, a 2.56-acre neighborhood park located at 716 North State Street, approximately 1.76 miles north of the project site, includes a ball field and courts, a playground, auditorium, and community room.. Wabash Recreation Center, a 1.34-acre neighborhood park located at 2765 Wabash Avenue, approximately 1.93 miles northeast of the project site, includes ball courts, a gymnasium, playground, auditorium, and community room. Ross Snyder Recreation Center, an acre community park located at 1501 East 41st Street, approximately 2 miles southwest of the project site, which includes the Ross Snyder Pool, various ball courts and fields, a gymnasium, playground, picnic area, auditorium. Given its location adjacent to the project site, Costello Recreation Center is the DRP facility most easily accessible to existing site residents. The center is heavily used by local residents, particularly in summer months when the pool is open, and a variety of classes and organized activities are held. Over time, the facilities at the center have deteriorated and are currently in need of repair. In addition to extensive graffiti throughout the park, numerous facilities and equipment exhibit dilapidated conditions, including play equipment that is damaged and unusable; several buildings show visible signs of structural decay; and equipment storage facilities are inadequate. The City has proposed plans to demolish and rebuild the swimming pool and bathhouse, with improvements to the pool pump house, basketball court, playground, parking lot, perimeter fencing, landscaping, and irrigation system. While some funding has been identified via park fees and voter-approved taxes, substantial additional funding is needed before the project can commence. (2) Project Site The existing site s open space and yard areas in relation to the building footprints and paved areas, including the amount of acreage devoted to each type of use, is illustrated in Figure IV.J-5 on page IV.J-84. As shown, the existing contiguous grassy open space consists of approximately 9.5 acres. This calculation takes into account green space that is clearly bounded by public walkways on all sides, that has buildings fronting all sides, and that is not associated with any one building in particular, such as a forecourt, streetscape, parking area, driveway, or area that has been claimed by an adjacent unit with fencing. Photographs depicting the character and location of the existing publically Page IV.J-83

5 Source: Torti Gallas and Partners, Inc N Feet Boyle Heights Mixed Use Community Project Figure IV.J-5 Overview of Existing Conditions Including Existing Open Space Page IV.J-84

6 accessible open space are provided in Figure IV.J-6 on page IV.J-86. The existing open space is irregular in shape and characterized by narrow fingers that protrude into developed areas of the site. While the open space is relatively significant in size, its awkward configuration, and uneven grade, limits its usefulness and makes it difficult to provide high quality passive and active recreational opportunities for the residents of the existing site and the surrounding community. The lawn and planted areas are in varying state of disrepair. The functionality, attractiveness and use of the existing space is further diminished by the multiple asphalt pedestrian pathways running throughout the open space as well as the fact that some existing residents have fenced or walled in portions of the public open space so as to create private yards for themselves. In addition to the contiguous open space there are approximately 9.71 acres of interstitial open space composed of bits and pieces of open space formed by the gaps between buildings or courtyards within buildings. Photographs depicting the character and location of the existing interstitial open space are provided in Figure IV.J-7 on page IV.J-87. In some cases these spaces have grass or plantings, and in some cases theses spaces are comprised of dirt surfaces. While some of these areas are grassy, because they are small, irregularly shaped, and often tightly sandwiched between buildings, roads, and parking lots, they do not significantly contribute to the open space at the project site. There are another approximately acres of unfenced yard space which are composed of the areas between the façades of each building and the adjacent asphalt pathways. Photographs depicting the character and location of the existing unfenced yard space are provided in Figure IV.J-8 on page IV.J-88. In addition, there are another 3.55 acres of private yards that were originally either interstitial open space or common open space that have been claimed by individual units as private open space through the use of fencing. Photographs depicting the character and location of the existing fenced yard space are provided in Figure IV.J-9 on page IV.J-89. Existing courtyard spaces, which in many cases consist of the yard space in the middle of a U-shaped building or the space in between two U-shaped buildings facing each other, are included in either the interstitial open space or unfenced yard space categories. Photographs depicting the character and locations of the existing courtyard spaces are provided in Figure IV.J-10 on page IV.J- 90. There are also an additional 8.2 acres of asphalt-covered surface parking lots. The largest expanse of open space at the site, known as the Mall, is approximately 80 feet wide and approximately one-third of a mile in length. This lawn area functions as an open space/drainage channel running from west to east, surrounded by pedestrian pathways, and with a perpendicular section bisecting the channel from north to south. Running the length of the Mall is a 40 foot wide surface drainage channel over which the has an easement that was granted in Overtime, the extensive tree root systems compounded by settlement of compacted subsurface conditions provide poor water penetration into the soil, resulting in pooling and standing water within the City s drainage easement area and parts of the Mall are prone to flooding where it does not drain Page IV.J-85

7 Character of Existing Publically Accessible Open Space Source: Fifteen Group Land and Development; Torti Gallas and Partners; Melendrez, FIFTEENGROUP LAND AND DEVELOPMENT Torti Gallas and Partners / M ELÉNDREZ N OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS Boyle Heights EXISTING Mixed-Use CONDITIONS Community Project JULY 7, 2011 Figure IV.J-6 Existing Publically Accessible Open Space Page IV.J-86 Page IV.E.1-23

8 Character of Existing Interstitial Open Space Source: Fifteen Group Land and Development; Torti Gallas and Partners; Melendrez, FIFTEENGROUP LAND AND DEVELOPMENT Torti Gallas and Partners / M ELÉNDREZ N OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS Boyle Heights EXISTING Mixed-Use CONDITIONS Community Project JUNE 14, 2011 Figure IV.J-7 Existing Interstitial Open Space Page IV.J-87 Page IV.E.1-23

9 Character of Existing Unfenced Yard Space Source: Fifteen Group Land and Development; Torti Gallas and Partners; Melendrez, FIFTEENGROUP LAND AND DEVELOPMENT Torti Gallas and Partners / M ELÉNDREZ N OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS Boyle Heights EXISTING Mixed-Use CONDITIONS Community Project JUNE 14, 2011 Figure IV.J-8 Existing Unfenced Yard Space Page IV.J-88 Page IV.E.1-23

10 Character of Existing Fenced Yard Space Source: Fifteen Group Land and Development; Torti Gallas and Partners; Melendrez, FIFTEENGROUP LAND AND DEVELOPMENT Torti Gallas and Partners / M ELÉNDREZ N OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS Boyle Heights EXISTING Mixed-Use CONDITIONS Community Project JUNE 14, 2011 Figure IV.J-9 Existing Fenced Yard Space Page IV.J-89

11 Character of Existing Courtyards Source: Fifteen Group Land and Development; Torti Gallas and Partners; Melendrez, FIFTEENGROUP LAND AND DEVELOPMENT Torti Gallas and Partners / M ELÉNDREZ N OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS Boyle Heights EXISTING Mixed-Use CONDITIONS Community Project SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Figure IV.J-10 Existing Courtyard Space Page IV.J-90

12 adequately. Over time, this condition has caused site erosion, particularly through the center of the site within the Mall and along adjacent build entryways and porches. Please see View 3 in Figure II-5 in Section II, Project Description, of this Draft EIR. The resulting erosion has worn away the finished ground surface in areas such that the site's open space is rutted and uneven in grade and the erosion of the top soil has exposed underground pipes in places, thus rendering the open space less functionally usable for recreation. Nonetheless, the Mall and the interstitial open space areas are used occasionally for passive recreation. In addition, there is a small area of the Mall that includes recreational equipment for children. In summary, because of the configuration of the site on six superblocks and the organization of the residential buildings around the Mall, access and sight lines through the open space areas are limited. The configuration of the existing buildings means that much of the contiguous open space cannot be accessed physically or visually from the residential units. In most cases, building entrances are on the other side of the units from the green spaces. The inability of residents to monitor these areas from the existing buildings is a security concern and is particularly noticeable at the Mall. There is also a lack of connectivity between the various fingers of open space, and a lack of direct access from existing buildings to existing open space. The interstitial spaces are often perceived as neither public nor private and hence are underutilized, neglected, and often unsafe. In addition, over the years occupants of individual units have claimed some common open space areas for private use through the erection of fences and walls, leaving such areas unavailable for the enjoyment of the community. Please refer to Figures IV.J-5 through IV.J-9 for photos illustrating these existing site conditions. b. Regulatory Framework (1) State Level (a) Quimby Act Section of the California Government Code, also known as the Quimby Act, was enacted in an effort to promote the availability of park and open space areas in response to California s rapid urbanization and decrease in the number of parks and recreational facilities. The Quimby Act authorizes cities and counties to enact ordinances requiring the dedication of land, or the payment of fees for park and/or recreational facilities in lieu thereof, or both, by developers of residential subdivisions as a condition to the approval of a tentative map or parcel map. Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section was authorized pursuant to the Quimby Act. The Quimby Act requires that parkland dedications not exceed 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons residing within a subdivision and that in-lieu fee payments not exceed Page IV.J-91

13 the proportionate amount necessary to provide 3 acres of parkland, unless the amount of existing neighborhood and community parkland exceeds that limit. As stated above, the current ratio of parkland in the project area is 0.70 acre per 1,000 residents. Thus, since the parkland standard is not exceeded in the project area, the maximum parkland dedication requirement for the proposed project under the Quimby Act would be 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. (2) Local Level The DRP has completed a number of planning documents that address the need for parks and recreational facilities within the. The most recent document completed by DRP is a Citywide Community Needs Assessment, discussed below. In addition, the General Plan indicates that the adequacy of the public park and recreation system is based on three general standards: (1) sufficient land area reserved for parks and recreation; (2) appropriate distribution of park and recreation facilities throughout the City; and (3) a full complement of park and recreation facility types (i.e., active and passive recreation for all age groups) to accommodate a wide variety of users. The General Plan further states that parks and recreational facilities should be provided at the neighborhood, community, and regional levels. The Public Recreation Plan (PRP), a component within the Service Systems Element of the City s General Plan, establishes policies and standards related to parks, recreation facilities, and open space areas in the City. The PRP provides citywide goals, objectives, and recommendations concerning parks and recreation facilities. In addition to the standards established in the PRP, park and open space requirements pursuant to the Quimby Act are also set forth in Sections and of the LAMC. The following provides information regarding both the PRP and applicable LAMC standards and requirements, as well as relevant objectives and policies from the Boyle Heights Community Plan. (a) Citywide Community Needs Assessment Recognizing the importance of parks and open space in the community, in 2009 the DRP completed a Citywide Community Needs Assessment (Assessment) that examines current and future recreational needs in the City as a first step in developing a Citywide park master/strategic plan and a five-year capital improvement plan. The overall objectives of the Assessment are to identify, quantify, and preliminarily prioritize the need for recreation and open space within the City, address needs for additional recreational facilities and parkland, identify improvements to facilities to meet current and future Page IV.J-92

14 demands, prevent future maintenance issues, and offer positive alternatives to an increasingly dense and urbanized population. 94 The Assessment provides a number of key recommendations to be implemented through a detailed master planning process. These recommendations include, but are not limited to, working with the City s Planning Department to modify Section of the LAMC and update the PRP, developing an updated pricing and revenue plan to offset capital and operational costs, and implementing a land acquisition strategy involving developer impact agreements based on the standards for open space desired. 95 Based on the Assessment, the expectation as to how far people are willing to travel to parks and recreational facilities has changed drastically since the time that the PRP (discussed below) was adopted in Specifically, 63 percent of survey respondents for the Assessment stated that they would travel at least 1 mile to visit a neighborhood park, and 38 percent of respondents would travel at least 2 miles. Additionally, 71 percent of respondents would travel at least 2 miles to visit a community park, while 37 percent would travel more than 3 miles. Given the accessibility of public transit, people have the opportunity to access parks further than 0.5 mile from their place of residence. The Assessment identifies some of the challenges faced by the DRP, including acquiring additional recreation and park land, preventing future maintenance problems through effective asset management and offering positive recreational alternatives to an increasingly dense and urbanized population. The Assessment sets forth guidelines for the DRP with respect to the size of parks and recommended service levels for the City s residents as follows: Mini parks of less than 1 acre in size: 0.10 acre per 1,000 persons; Neighborhood parks between 1 and 5 acres in size: 1.5 acres per 1,000 persons; Community parks between 10 and 50 acres in size: 2 acres per 1,000 residents; and 94 Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, Citywide Community Needs Assessment, planning/pdf/exesum.pdf, accessed August 30, Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks, Final Report of the Citywide Community Needs Assessment, accessed August 30, Page IV.J-93

15 Regional and large urban parks of greater than 50 acres in size: 6 acres per 1,000 residents. The Assessment also makes the following findings: The City lacks the appropriate levels of neighborhood and community parks that are close to home, and parks are not equitably distributed. The amount of park land available in the City is low for the level of density in the City, and people would like more land for mini parks, neighborhood parks, community parks and downtown parks. More parks are needed in redevelopment areas. There is a concern that some parks are unsafe and controlled by gangs and lack significant security, keeping people from using such parks in a productive manner. Parks are in need of infrastructure improvements to restrooms, parking areas, playgrounds, picnic facilities, sports courts, security lighting, irrigation systems, and sports fields. Poor general site conditions encourage vandalism and keep the community from using the parks in a positive manner. Sports fields are a needed amenity. Sustainable landscapes in parks are an important design element that the DRP should incorporate into design standards. Some existing parks are outdated in design. The DRP needs to develop new design standards for parks in the future and customize the parks to the people living in the area that will be using each park. The walkability of the City and the ability to walk in City parks are important. The DRP must create a balance of park types and manage park and amenity standards that promote equal access. Many citizens indicate that parks are overused on weekends. Los Angeles River improvements were brought forward as opportunity sites that could be developed and improved for parks and recreational purposes. (b) Public Recreation Plan Adopted in 1980 by the Los Angeles City Council, the PRP focuses on the development of physical facilities by emphasizing the provision of neighborhood and community recreation sites, including community buildings, gymnasiums, swimming pools, Page IV.J-94

16 and tennis courts. 96 To a large extent, the PRP focuses on facility planning in residential areas, as these areas generate the greatest demand for parks and recreational facilities. The PRP also establishes general locations for future facilities based on a proposed service radius and projected population levels. According to the standard park characteristics identified in the PRP, park facilities are discussed in terms of local parks and regional facilities. Local parks (while not discussed in the PRP) are generally accepted to include neighborhood and community recreation sites, open space, and small parks, which are usually characterized as less than 1 acre in size. A neighborhood park typically provides space and facilities for outdoor and indoor recreational activities intended to serve residents of all ages within the immediate neighborhood. Neighborhood parks typically include a recreation building, multipurpose field, hard court area, play apparatus, picnic area, off-street parking, and a maintenance area. Although the PRP states that minimum desirable acreage of a neighborhood park is 5 acres and the ideal size for a neighborhood park is considered to be 10 acres, such parks within the are typically between 1 to 5 acres in size. Community parks are designed to serve residents of all ages in several surrounding neighborhoods and include such facilities as community buildings, multi-purpose fields, hard court areas, parking, maintenance service areas, and play areas. These facilities may also include baseball diamonds, football and soccer fields, tennis and handball courts, and a swimming pool. According to the PRP, the minimum desirable acreage of a community park is 15 acres and the ideal size for a community park is considered to be 20 acres. Regional parks are generally at least 50 acres and provide specialized recreational facilities such as lakes, golf courses, campgrounds and museums. Regional parks serve residents throughout the Los Angeles basin. The PRP also states that the location and allocation of acreage for neighborhood and community park and recreational facilities should be determined on the basis of the service radius within residential areas throughout the City. The desired long-range standard for local parks is based on a minimum of 2 acres per 1,000 persons for neighborhood parks with a service radius of 0.5 mile, and a minimum 2 acres per 1,000 persons for community parks with a service radius of 2 miles. However, the PRP also notes that these long-range standards may not be reached during the life of the plan and, therefore, includes more attainable short- and intermediate-range standards of 1 acre per 1,000 persons within a 1-mile service radius for neighborhood parks and 1 acre per 1,000 persons within a 2-mile service radius for community parks. These standards are 96, Public Recreation Plan, a portion of the Service Systems Element of the Los Angeles General Plan, approved October 9, Page IV.J-95

17 Citywide goals and are not intended to be requirements for individual development projects. Furthermore, as indicated above, the Citywide Community Needs Assessment states that since the time that the PRP was adopted in 1980, the expectation as to how far people are willing to travel to parks and recreational facilities has changed drastically. Given the accessibility of public transit, it is now easy and convenient for people to access parks further than 1 or 2 miles from their place of residence. (c) Los Angeles Municipal Code Section of the LAMC requires that all residential developments containing six or more dwelling units on a lot provide, at a minimum, the following usable open space area per dwelling unit: 100 square feet for each unit having less than three habitable rooms, 125 square feet for each unit having three habitable rooms, and 175 square feet for each unit having more than three habitable rooms. 97 Section of the LAMC also identifies what areas of a project qualify as usable open space for the purposes of meeting the project s open space requirements. Usable open space is defined as areas designed and intended to be used for active or passive recreation and may consist of private and/or common areas as further defined and regulated in Section Common open space (i.e., areas that are readily accessible to all residents of the site) must constitute at least 50 percent of the total required usable open space. Common open space areas can incorporate recreational amenities such as swimming pools, spas, children s play areas, and sitting areas. A minimum of 25 percent of the common open space area must be planted with ground cover, shrubs, or trees. In addition, indoor recreation amenities cannot constitute more than 25 percent of the total required usable open space. Private open space is defined as areas which are contiguous to and immediately accessible from an individual dwelling unit and which contain a minimum of 50 square feet, of which no more than 50 square feet per dwelling unit is counted toward the total required usable open space. Private open space may not have a dimension of less than 6 feet in any direction. In addition, Section of the LAMC, authorized under the Quimby Act, requires developers of residential subdivisions to set aside and dedicate land for park and recreational uses and/or pay in-lieu fees for park improvements. The area of land within a subdivision that is required to be dedicated is determined by the maximum density permitted by the zone within which the development is located. The proposed project is requesting a zone change to the Boyle Heights Mixed-Use Specific Plan Zone, which would be permitted to develop a maximum density of 60 to 70 dwelling units per acre. Thus, based on the provisions set forth in LAMC Section 17.12, 24.7 percent or approximately 97 Per LAMC Section 12.03, for the purpose of applying the open space requirements of Section G, a kitchen shall not be considered a habitable room. Page IV.J-96

18 16.5 acres of the gross subdivision area would be required to be dedicated to park and recreational uses. If the developer does not meet the full dedication requirement, fees for park improvements may be paid to the DRP in lieu of the dedication of all or a portion of all the land. The in-lieu fees are calculated per dwelling unit to be constructed based on the zoning of the project site and must be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. These fees are adjusted annually. As the project involves a zone change to newly defined zone, the in lieu fee shall be established by DRP. Section of the LAMC allows recreation areas developed on a subdivision for use by the particular subdivision s residents to be credited against the project s land dedication requirement. High intensity recreational areas that qualify under this provision of Section include, in part, swimming pools and spas (when the spas are an integral part of a pool complex), tennis and basketball courts, and children s play areas with playground equipment comparable in type and quality to those found in City parks. Low intensity recreational areas include landscaped open areas, picnic grounds and athletic fields. Furthermore, the recreational areas proposed as part of a project must meet the following standards in order to be credited against the requirement for land dedication: (1) each facility is available for use by all residents of a subdivision; and (2) the area and the facilities satisfy the park and recreation needs of a subdivision so as to reduce that project s need for public park and recreation facilities. Importantly, the recreational facilities must be privately owned and maintained and the use of the facilities must be restricted for park and recreational purposes by recorded covenants that run with the land. (d) Boyle Heights Community Plan As further described in Section IV.G, Land Use, of this Draft EIR, the Boyle Heights Community Plan (Community Plan) was originally adopted on November 10, The Community Plan sets forth objectives, policies, and programs to meet the needs of the Boyle Heights community through the year The intent of the Community Plan is to promote an arrangement of land uses, circulation, and services that will encourage and contribute to the economic, social, and physical health, safety, welfare, and convenience of the people who live and work in the community. The Community Plan provides a number of objectives and policies regarding recreation and park facilities. In particular, objectives and policies of the Community Plan regarding recreation and park facilities include the following: Page IV.J-97

19 (i) Objectives 1. To provide adequate recreation and park facilities which meet the needs of the residents in the community. 2. To conserve, maintain and better utilize existing recreation and park facilities which promote the recreational experience. (ii) Policies Preserve and improve the existing recreation and park facilities and park space. In addition to the acquisition of new parkland and expansion and improvement of existing parks, the Community Plan recognizes that joint use of public school facilities may help to achieve parkland goals, as will the use of open space along freeways. In addition to dedicated park and recreational facilities, open space frequently serves recreational purposes. Pursuant to the Community Plan, open space is broadly defined as follows: Land which is essentially free of structures and buildings or is natural in character and which functions in one or more of the following ways: (1) recreational and educational opportunities; (2) scenic, cultural, and historic values; (3) public health and safety; (4) preservation and creation of community identity; (5) right-of-way for utilities and transportation, facilities; and (6) preservation of natural resources as ecologically important areas Environmental Impacts a. Methodology The methodology used to evaluate potential park and recreation impacts involves the following: (1) reviewing the existing parks and recreational facilities in the project vicinity; (2) projecting the future residential population associated with the project; and (3) evaluating the demand for park and recreation service anticipated at the time of project buildout compared to the expected level of service available, considering both DRP facilities as well as the project s open space and recreational amenities. In addition, the analysis compares the project s provision of recreational and open space areas to the standards set forth by the Quimby Act, the PRP, and the LAMC. To be consistent with the standards set forth in the aforementioned regulatory guidance documents, the analysis of 98 Boyle Heights Community Plan, November 10, 1998, pages III-7 and III-8. Page IV.J-98

20 impacts is based, in part, on the acreage of park/open space available per 1,000 project residents. It is noted, however, that the PRP parkland standards are Citywide goals and do not constitute requirements for individual development projects. b. Thresholds of Significance Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines provides sample questions that address impacts with regard to public facilities such as parks, as well as recreation. These questions are as follows: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Parks? Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? In the context of these questions, based on the CEQA Thresholds Guide (2006) and Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the determination of significance for impacts to parks and recreation facilities is made on a case-by-case basis, considering the following factors: The net population increase resulting from the proposed project. The demand for recreational and park services anticipated at the time of project build-out compared to the expected level of service available. Consider, as applicable, scheduled improvements to recreation and park services (renovation, expansion, or addition) and the project s proportional contribution to the demand. Whether the project includes features that would reduce the demand for recreational and park services (e.g., on-site recreation facilities, land dedication or direct financial support to the Department of Recreation and Parks). Page IV.J-99

21 Based on these factors, the proposed project would have a significant impact on parks and recreational services if: The project generates a demand for park or recreational facilities that cannot be adequately accommodated by existing or planned facilities and services; or Project construction interferes with existing park usage in a manner that would substantially reduce the service quality of the existing parks in the project area. c. Project Design Features The project would include a substantial amount of landscaped open space and recreational areas of different scales and styles. The goals of these open space areas are to: (1) provide safe recreational opportunities in an under-served community; (2) make available a mix of active and passive recreational uses; (3) ensure open sight lines; (4) facilitate access by a variety of users; (5) promote a high level of connectivity throughout the neighborhood; and (6) provide clearly delineated public and private boundaries to ensure a safe environment for residents, park users, and businesses. The size and configuration of the new open space will create a cohesive and interconnected open space environment that will provide a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities that accommodate a wide variety of users. Specifically, the project would include a civic plaza, an expansive central park, active parks with recreational facilities, neighborhood greens, neighborhood playgrounds, and landscaped courtyards and pathways. All of the various parks will provide either active or passive recreational opportunities to the community. The passive areas within the neighborhood parks will offer shade trees, shade trellises, benches, small plaza spaces and places to sit and relax. Playground equipment, appropriate to a variety of age groups, will be constructed, as well as adequate shade and seating for supervising adults. Open space and recreational areas would be spread throughout the site, with the most expansive open space element centrally located and adjoining other nearby open space amenities, as shown in Figure II-6 in Section II, Project Description. The surface drainage channel within the existing Mall would be replaced in the project with a state-of-the-art stormwater management system comprised of bio-swales, biofiltration and infiltration, native plantings and oaks. Known as the Arroyo Walk, this modern stormwater management system would move stormwater across the site through the bio-swales for infiltration, incorporating pedestrian pathways and natural plantings. This central park would serve as the central public gathering area for the project and include a linear water feature and a paved civic plaza space which will function as an outdoor community patio. Page IV.J-100

22 Three neighborhood and/or civic parks to be located along the northern boundary of the project site at Eighth Street are significant design features of the new open space. The project would redistribute the open space so that it is accessible and inviting to the surrounding neighborhood. The two tot-lots that would be improved as part of the project would provide a direct linkage between the project and the adjacent schools of Christopher Dena Elementary School located on Dacotah Street to the east of the site and the Garza Primary Center located on E. Hostetter Street to the west of the site. The tot-lots would provide active recreational opportunities as well as increase pedestrian participation in the development. As discussed in detail in Section II, Project Description, of this Draft EIR, the proposed project includes approximately 10.5 acres of publicly available, privately funded and maintained, usable open space. This space would include a civic plaza, an expansive central park, active parks, neighborhood greens, and neighborhood playgrounds. Recreational areas would include amenities such as play equipment, athletic courts, seating, and open play areas. A public use easement would ensure access for the greater general public from dawn until dusk. In addition, semi-private open space would be provided for each individual development within the site. Semi-private open space includes facilities such as pools, recreational rooms within residential buildings, roof decks, and courtyards. The required percentage of semi-private open space set forth in the Specific Plan is based on building types; each building type would have a minimum open space requirement that is measured as a percentage of the lot area and ranges from 15 percent to 30 percent (e.g., rowhouses would require at least 15 percent of the lot area to be dedicated to open space, podium buildings would require at least 25 percent, podium high-rise buildings would require at least 30 percent, etc.). Furthermore, the Specific Plan dictates how the minimum open space requirements can be achieved for each building type, for instance through yards, patios, roof decks, courtyards, etc. The final amount of semi-private open space provided on-site would vary depending on the building types ultimately selected for development, however, based on a conservative conceptual site plan and conceptual building arrangement presented in Figure II-6 and Figure II-7 in Section II, Project Description, the project is expected to include approximately 11 acres of semi-private open space. Such facilities would be available to the residents of each building/complex within which each facility is located. In total, the project s public and semi-private open space/recreational areas would be approximately 21.5 acres. Private open space may also be provided in the form of residential balconies accessible from individual dwelling units. Based on conservative assumptions, it is Page IV.J-101

23 anticipated that at least 2.5 acres of private balconies would be provided. 99 Such private spaces would be in addition to the open space requirements set forth in the Specific Plan and would provide for a total of approximately 24 acres of public, semi-private, and private recreational and open space on-site. Moreover, the project would provide approximately 10.4 acres of landscaped streetscape and approximately 7.8 acres of unfenced yard space. The project s open space and yard areas in relation to the building footprints and paved areas, including the amount of acreage devoted to each type of use, is illustrated in Figure IV.J-11 on page IV.J-103. Upon completion of the project, the total amount of open space at the ground level, including publicly accessible open space, unfenced yards, streetscape, interstitial spaces, paseos, and courtyards would be acres, compared to acres of comparable space that currently exists on the project site. However, the proposed project would reorganize the hierarchy of open space by eliminating the 8.2 acres of surface parking lots and much of the existing interstitial open space and yard space, and replacing these areas with enhanced streetscapes, a reorganized and improved park system, and courtyard spaces for each of the proposed new buildings. As such, the quality and usability of the on-site open spaces would be substantially improved. Up to 25,000 square feet of civic uses would also be provided as part of the project. These uses would be located in the central northern portion of the site and would consist of community-serving or public facilities, potentially including a public library and community room. d. Analysis of Project Impacts (1) Impacts on Existing Facilities As discussed in Section IV.I.3., Population, of this Draft EIR, the proposed project includes the development of up to 4,400 new dwelling units, which would introduce an estimated residential population of 10,127 persons (a net increase of 3,982 persons over current site conditions). The net population increase associated with the proposed development would generate additional demand for parks and recreational facilities. However, as discussed above, the project would provide approximately 24 acres of public, semi-private, and private open space with various substantial active and passive recreational amenities. Due to the size and availability of a wide range of amenities, it is anticipated that project residents would primarily utilize on-site open space to meet their recreational needs. Therefore, the use of off-site park and recreational facilities by project 99 Assumes that half of all residential units on-site have a 50-square-foot balcony. Page IV.J-102

24 Source: Torti Gallas and Partners, Inc Boyle Heights Mixed Use Community Project N Feet Figure IV.J-11 Overview of Proposed Conditions Including Proposed Open Space Page IV.J-103

25 residents would be minimized. While project residents would be expected to utilize off-site community parks and recreational facilities to some degree, given the amount of park and open space amenities to be provided on-site, the project s population of 10,127 residents would not cause or accelerate substantial physical deterioration of any off-site local or regional park or recreational facilities. In addition, off-site recreational facility use by employees and customers of the proposed project is expected to be minimal. Through the availability of on-site facilities, the project s demand for park facilities is anticipated to be adequately met. Thus, the project would not substantially increase the use of off-site neighborhood and regional parks and recreational facilities, nor would it substantially increase demand for recreation programs. (2) Consistency with Regulations (a) Public Recreation Plan (PRP) As discussed above, the PRP s desired long-range standard for local parks for the City is 2 acres per 1,000 persons for neighborhood parks and 2 acres per 1,000 persons for community parks. However, the PRP also notes that these long-range standards may not be reached during the life of the plan, and therefore includes more attainable short- and intermediate-range standards of 1 acre per 1,000 persons for neighborhood parks and 1 acre per 1,000 persons for community parks. Currently, both Citywide park space and Community Plan Area park space are provided at an estimated rate of 0.70 acre per 1,000 residents. 100 Therefore, neither the City nor the Community Plan Area meets the PRP s desired short-, intermediate-, or long-range standards. However, as previously indicated, these standards are Citywide goals and are not intended to be requirements for individual development projects. Furthermore, the Citywide Community Needs Assessment states that since the time that the PRP was adopted in 1980, the distance many people are willing to travel to parks and recreational facilities has increased substantially. Based on the estimated 10,127 residents to be generated by the project, the project would require approximately 20 acres of neighborhood parkland within a 0.5-mile radius to meet the PRP s long-range standard or approximately 10 acres within a 1-mile radius to meet the PRP s short- and intermediate-range standard. Of the approximately 24 acres of public, semi-private, and private open space to be provided by the project, approximately 10.5 acres would consist of publically available, privately funded and maintained open space, including a civic plaza, an expansive central park, active parks with recreational 100 Written communication, Jon Kirk Mukri and Michael Shull, Department of Recreation and Parks, July 18, Page IV.J-104

26 facilities, neighborhood greens, neighborhood playgrounds, and landscaped courtyards and pathways and, thus, would be considered as neighborhood parkland. Also, there is an additional 11 acres of semi-private open space throughout the project that would be readily accessible to residents. These amenities essentially provide the residents with a neighborhood park that is customized to the type of residential development proposed. These facilities would serve residents of all ages within the immediate neighborhood (the residential unit) and would include both active and passive recreational amenities and, therefore, should also be included when considering the public open space at the project. Therefore, in total, the project would provide approximately 21.5 acres of neighborhood open space, thereby exceeding the approximately 20 acres needed to meet the PRP s long-range standard. The proposed project would also meet the short- and intermediaterange standards for neighborhood parks. For comparison, based on the project s net population increase of 3,982 residents, the project would require approximately 8 acres of neighborhood parkland within a 0.5-mile radius to meet the PRP s long-range standard or approximately 4 acres within a 1-mile radius to meet the PRP s short- and intermediaterange standard. The project would meet these standards. Similarly, with regard to community parks, the project would need to provide approximately 20 acres of community parkland to meet the PRP s long-range standard or approximately 10 acres to meet the short- and intermediate-range standard of the City. With the project s common open space and recreational opportunities, the use of existing community parks in the area would be minimized. Nevertheless, residents of the proposed development may utilize off-site community parks and recreational facilities in addition to using the on-site recreation and open space amenities. Despite the project s provision of approximately 10.5 acres of public open space, the project would fall short of DRP s various community park standards. However, implementation of the mitigation measure specified below would ensure that through the provision of on-site recreational amenities and open space areas, payment of in-lieu fees, dedication of parkland, or a combination of these methods, the project would comply with the parks and recreational requirements set forth by State law. (b) Municipal Code (LAMC) As previously discussed, Section of the LAMC requires that all buildings containing six or more dwelling units on a lot provide a minimum square footage of usable open space per dwelling unit. As described above, in lieu of these provisions, the open space requirements of the Boyle Heights Mixed-Use Community Specific Plan would be implemented, and open space would be provided based on each of the building types ultimately developed on-site. These Specific Plan requirements would exceed the requirements set forth in Section of the LAMC, as shown in Table IV.J-13 on page IV.J-106. Specifically, based on the LAMC requirements, the proposed dwelling unit types, and assumed unit sizes, the project would be required to provide a total of 679,000 square Page IV.J-105