Item: Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA and 3435 West Spruce Street. AYE NAY ABSENT DATE: November 14, 2016

Transcription

1 Resolution Item: Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA and 3435 West Spruce Street AYE NAY ABSENT DATE: November 14, 2016 Mitch Thrower, Chair Bowen A Arnold, Vice-Chair Gary Pike, Member-at-Large Stephanie A Agliano X X X X Matthew D Buzza X Mitch Thrower X Chair Derek L Doughty, PE Theodore Trent Green, RA Nigel M Joseph Jacqueline S Wilds Melissa E Zornitta, AICP Executive Director X X X Melissa E. Zornitta, AICP Executive Director On motion of Comm. Arnold Seconded by Comm. Joseph The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission has developed a Comprehensive Plan for Tampa, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, which was originally adopted by the Tampa City Council on January 7, 2016 as amended; and WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission has received a privately initiated map amendment to the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan; and Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org planner@plancom.org E Kennedy Blvd 18 th Floor Tampa, FL, WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission staff has reviewed TA/CPA that proposes a future land use designation of Community Mixed Use-35 for the subject parcels 0.7-acres that are located at 3425 and 3435 West Spruce Street; and WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed map amendment, has considered existing/future development patterns and community facilities, as well as the adopted goals, objectives and policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan as follows:

2 Resolution Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA Map Amendment 3425 and 3435 West Spruce Street November 14, 2016 Livable City- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.1: Recognize the Central Tampa District as the primary urban employment, civic and cultural center, building upon the heritage assets found in its diverse neighborhoods while fostering a vibrant urban lifestyle through mixed-use development via entertainment and cultural facilities. LU Policy 1.1.6: Encourage transit oriented, pedestrian friendly mixed-use development with attractive and multifunctional corridors through Community Planning efforts in the Westshore, Central Tampa and University planning districts. LU Policy 1.1.7: Continue to consider the development of strategically located mixed-use areas in all districts that accommodate local serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses. Mixed Use Corridors- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 6.1: The transformation of major corridors to include a broader mix of uses, both horizontal and vertical, that provides opportunities for medium and higher density housing, while also addressing local and citywide demand for retail and services. LU Policy 6.1.1: Promote redevelopment of existing automobile-oriented corridors and the upgrading of existing commercial development to create vibrant, mixed- use boulevards that balance efficient movement of motor vehicles with the creation of attractive pedestrian-friendly districts that serve the adjoining neighborhoods as well as passing motorists. LU Policy 6.1.6: Ensure that the introduction of higher density mixed-use development along major arterial corridors and collector roads is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring such features as: Buildings setback from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-family residential uses; Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses (including historic districts) to maintain appropriate transitions in scale, massing and height and to protect privacy and solar access; Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas, to the degree feasible; and Lighting shielded and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses. LU Policy : Promote densities, mixes of uses, and transportation improvements that support walking and use of public transportation. LU Policy : Accommodate planned levels of household and employment growth. Depending on the characteristics of each area, establish concentrations of employment and housing at varying densities and with varying mixes of uses.

3 Resolution Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA Map Amendment 3425 and 3435 West Spruce Street November 14, 2016 LU Policy : Collaborate with the community in planning for the future. Overall Residential Development and Redevelopment- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 9.3: Compatible development and redevelopment to sustain stable, neighborhoods and ensure the social and economic health of the City. LU Policy 9.3.1: Areas adjacent to, or within, neighborhoods that are planned for non-residential uses shall be developed in a manner which is sensitive and compatible to the affected neighborhood(s). Commercial Areas Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 15.2: Develop commercial areas in a manner which enhances the City of Tampa s character and ambiance. LU Policy : Mixed-use development is preferred over commercial development. LU Policy : Develop incentives to encourage commercial structures to be more than one story and vertically mixed. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission staff has determined that TA/CPA is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission recommends the Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment TA/CPA be found CONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forwards it to the Tampa City Council for approval.

4 City of Tampa: TA/CPA and 3435 West Spruce Street Planning Commission Public Hearing: November 14, 2016 Future Land Use Map Amendment Summary Information Application Type Privately Initiated Location 3425 and 3435 West Spruce Street Property Size 0.7 ± acres Folio Number , Existing Future Land Use Residential-10 (R-10), Residential-20 (R-20) Proposed Future Land Use Community Mixed Use-35 Existing Land Use Vacant Residential Roadways North Himes Avenue and West Spruce Street are designated as collector roadways. Neighborhood McFarlane Park Vision Map Designations Central Tampa Planning District Agency Review Comments All Agency Comments are provided in Attachment B Applicable Plan Sections Livable City, Mixed Use Corridors, Commercial Areas Staff Planner Jennifer Malone, , ext. 324, malonej@plancom.org Staff Recommendation CONSISTENT Impact of Proposed Change Potential Impact Current Land Use Category Proposed Land Use Category Acres: 0.51 acres Residential-10 (R-10) Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) Maximum Density Up to 10 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC) Up to 35 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC) Maximum Residential 5 DU 17 DU Development Potential Range of Allowable Uses Single family detached and attached residential development. General commercial, professional office, and multifamily development (either density or floor area ratio); gathering places such as a plaza, courtyard, or parks; and compatible public, quasi-public and special uses. Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)/Non-Residential Development 0.35 FAR/ 7,775 square feet of non-residential uses. 2.0 FAR/ 44,431 square feet of non-residential uses. To encourage a true mixture of uses, residential development may be guided by either density or FAR. 1

5 Practical Impacts The proposed change would allow general commercial uses, support a mixed-use development pattern, and increase the allowable density and intensity of the subject site. Potential Impact Current Land Use Category Proposed Land Use Category Acres: 0.19 acres Residential-20 (R-20) Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) Maximum Density Up to 20 dwelling units per gross acre(du/ac) Up to 35 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC) Maximum Residential Development Potential 3 DU 6 DU Range of Allowable Uses Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)/Non-Residential Development Single family detached and attached residential development. Compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses are allowed consideration. Limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses consistent with Locational Criteria in the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. 0.5 FAR/ 4,138 square feet of non-residential uses. General commercial, professional office, and multifamily development (either density or floor area ratio); gathering places such as a plaza, courtyard, or parks; and compatible public, quasi-public and special uses. 2.0 FAR/ 61,552 square feet of non-residential uses. To encourage a true mixture of uses, residential development may be guided by either density or FAR. Practical Impacts The proposed change would allow general commercial uses, support a mixed-use development pattern, and increase the allowable density and intensity of the subject site. CUMULATIVE TOTAL OF ENTIRE REQUEST Potential Impacts Current Land Use Category Proposed Land Use Category Total Acres: 0.70 acres Maximum Density Residential-10 (R-10), Residential-20 (R-20) Up to 10 and 20 dwelling units per gross acre, dependent on Future Land Use designation (DU/AC) Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) Up to 35 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC) 2

6 Maximum Residential Development Potential 8 DU 25 DU Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)/Non-Residential Development 0.35 FAR, 0.5 FAR/ 11,913 square feet of non-residential uses. 2.0 FAR/ 105,983 square feet of non-residential uses. To encourage a true mixture of uses, residential development may be guided by either density or FAR. Practical Impacts The proposed change would allow general commercial uses, support a mixed-use development pattern, and increase the allowable density and intensity of the subject site. Context of Proposed Change 3

7 Existing Land Uses and Typical Development in the Area The existing land uses of the subject site, which is comprised of two parcels, are single-family (yellow) and vacant (grey). Existing land uses in the surrounding area include: public to the north, which is the location of a water tower (blue), single family to the east and northwest (yellow), and light commercial to the west and south (pink). Existing Land Use Map Future Land Uses The subject property has two Future Land Use designations, Residential-10 (orange) and Residential-20 (light brown). Residential-10 provides for low-density single family detached residential and limited townhomes. Residential-20 provides for single-family dwelling units, as well as greater opportunities for multi-family dwelling units. Each of the categories allow consideration of limited neighborhoodserving commercial uses, if consistent with the Locational Criteria in the Comprehensive Plan. Community Mixed Use-35 (pink) is Adopted Future Land Use Map located to the west of the subject sites, along North Himes Avenue. Community Commercial-35 (red) is also to the west of the site, which allows for more intense commercial uses. Regional Mixed use-100 (dark pink) is located further west, along North Dale Mabry Highway. Regional Mixed Use-100 allows for high intensity and density development, with an allowable Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 3.5 and 100 dwelling units per acre. Typical uses in the Regional Mixed Use-100 category are major office and regional-serving commercial developments. North Dale Mabry Highway is also designated as a Transit Emphasis Corridor, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. these are roadways in which redevelopment should be supported by quality transit services, as well as innovative urban design and traffic engineering standards to create safe and attractive streets for pedestrians and automobiles. 4

8 Applicant s Request The applicant s request would amend 0.7 acres from Residential 10 (R-10) and Residential-20 (R-20) to Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35). Proposed Future Land Use Map Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Criteria Livable City- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.1: Recognize the Central Tampa District as the primary urban employment, civic and cultural center, building upon the heritage assets found in its diverse neighborhoods while fostering a vibrant urban lifestyle through mixed-use development via entertainment and cultural facilities. LU Policy 1.1.6: Encourage transit oriented, pedestrian friendly mixed-use development with attractive and multifunctional corridors through Community Planning efforts in the Westshore, Central Tampa and University planning districts. LU Policy 1.1.7: Continue to consider the development of strategically located mixed-use areas in all districts that accommodate local serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses. Mixed Use Corridors- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 6.1: The transformation of major corridors to include a broader mix of uses, both horizontal and vertical, that provides opportunities for medium and higher density housing, while also addressing local and citywide demand for retail and services. LU Policy 6.1.1: Promote redevelopment of existing automobile-oriented corridors and the upgrading of existing commercial development to create vibrant, mixed- use boulevards that 5

9 balance efficient movement of motor vehicles with the creation of attractive pedestrian-friendly districts that serve the adjoining neighborhoods as well as passing motorists. LU Policy 6.1.6: Ensure that the introduction of higher density mixed-use development along major arterial corridors and collector roads is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring such features as: Buildings setback from rear or side yard property lines adjoining single-family residential uses; Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses (including historic districts) to maintain appropriate transitions in scale, massing and height and to protect privacy and solar access; Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas, to the degree feasible; and Lighting shielded and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses. LU Policy : Promote densities, mixes of uses, and transportation improvements that support walking and use of public transportation. LU Policy : Accommodate planned levels of household and employment growth. Depending on the characteristics of each area, establish concentrations of employment and housing at varying densities and with varying mixes of uses. LU Policy : Collaborate with the community in planning for the future. Overall Residential Development and Redevelopment- Goals, Objectives and Policies LU Objective 9.3: Compatible development and redevelopment to sustain stable, neighborhoods and ensure the social and economic health of the City. LU Policy 9.3.1: Areas adjacent to, or within, neighborhoods that are planned for non-residential uses shall be developed in a manner which is sensitive and compatible to the affected neighborhood(s). Commercial Areas Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 15.2: Develop commercial areas in a manner which enhances the City of Tampa s character and ambiance. LU Policy : Mixed-use development is preferred over commercial development. LU Policy : Develop incentives to encourage commercial structures to be more than one story and vertically mixed. Staff Analysis The subject property is comprised of 2 parcels that total approximately 0.7 acres. The subject site is located within the Macfarlane Park neighborhood. The subject property is surrounded by residential and commercial land uses. West of the subject site is North Dale Mabry Highway, which is a designated Transit Emphasis Corridor. The subject 6

10 site benefits from its location at the northeast corner of a signalized intersection of two collector roadways. The intersection presently has general and neighborhood serving uses on two of the four corners as what could be referred to as a neighborhood commercial node. The roadways also connect to a variety of activity centers in Tampa, and provide alternate North-South and East- West routes through the City. The development trend in the immediate area is currently low-density commercial. Directly to the south of the subject site is a gas station, and a strip commercial development is to the southwest. Further south along Himes Avenue is the rear of a high intensity commercial development, which fronts North Dale Mabry Highway. The primary impact of the change would be to allow general commercial uses and, increase the allowable density and intensity of the subject site. Examples of uses allowed under the Community Mixed Use-35 designation include medical and professional offices, restaurants, and pharmacies. The proposed change is consistent with the existing uses along Himes Avenue, extending from the interstate, north to Columbus Drive, which mostly consist of professional office uses. Allowing these types of uses along Himes Avenue are complementary in character and scale to the existing built environment, and further the intent of the comprehensive plan as it relates to the long-term vision of mixed use corridors as areas in the city which provide for a broad mix of uses, and which serve the adjoining neighborhood and passing motorists (LU Policy 6.1.1). The Tampa Comprehensive Plan also encourages strategically mixed-use areas in all districts, to provide local serving commercial and employment uses (LU Policy 1.1.7). Based on the access to a transportation network, and the development trend along Himes Avenue and Spruce Street, the requested change is in the best interest of the surrounding area. The change to Community Mixed Use-35 will complement the Community Mixed Use-35 presently along Himes Avenue, and will allow for the continued transformation of North Himes Avenue and West Spruce Street in the Central Tampa Planning District. Based on this direction from the Comprehensive Plan, and the historical development pattern of the area, the requested change is comparable and compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the proposed land use designation change for Tampa Plan Amendment TA/CPA from Residential-10 (R-10) and Residential-20 (R-20) to Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) CONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to Tampa City Council. 7

11 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 8

12 Attachment A Map Series 1. General Locator Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Adopted Future Land Use Map 5. Proposed Future Land Use Map 9

13 CITY OF TAMPA GENERAL LOCATION MAP LAKE FERN RD LUTZ NS BL VD AUGUST 2016 PLAN AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL BR UC E B DO W LIVINGSTON AVE XPWY NS E RA TE VE RI S MO R FOWLER AVE HIMES AVE ^^ ^ TA/CPA KINGSWAY RD RD BETWEEN GREEN AND MAIN STREETS EX PW Y N MO YS EL RO MACDILL AVE LE E WESTSHORE BLVD TA/CPA EAST SIDE OF N. MANHATTAN AVENUE, SR 60 / BRANDON BLVD TA/CPA SOUTH DALE MABRY HIGHWAY AND WEST DELEON STREET TA/CPA NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST SPRUCE STREET AND NORTH HIMES AVENUE JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. BLVD BLOOMINGDALE AVE E IDG I-75 Y BR E. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. BLVD. AND E. IDA STREET H OR E D GAN SR 60 / ADAMO DR CAUSEWAY BLVD TA/CPA EAST SIDE OF N. SUWANEE AVENUE, BETWEEN BLVD KING VE WAY A KENNEDY BLVD / SR 60 TA/CPA I- D L NK RA D BROA ML BAYS AR W HO 5/ 7 2 GE RID F RD WA HO E IDG ^ COLUMBUS DR Y 92 VALRICO RD TA/CPA W US H PARSONS AVE TA/CPA I-4 WILLIAMS RD AV E R DB AN MAJOR RIVERS WATER NEBRASKA AVE H SW Y MPBELL C DB AN KL AN R F EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK FALKENBURG RD E Y CA OR OU G TAMPA SERVICE AREA 78TH ST COURTN SB COUNTY BOUNDARY URBAN SERVICE AREA CR 579 BUSCH BLVD HI LL 1 56TH ST AV E NE Y UG H 30 FLETCHER AVE HA R BA NN HW Y Y MCINTOSH RD N BOULEVARD LIN E GU HW PLAN AMENDMENT JURISDICTION BOUNDARY ARMEN IA AVE RA RD SHELDON RD CE K US I-275 FLORIDA AVE S AVE ARS BE AC TR ^ BR ID DALE MABRY HWY GE RD LEGEND H US 0 6,500 13,000 26,000 39,000 52,000 WY Feet 41 BOYETTE RD RHODINE RD AUTHOR:WELSH Date: 10/7/2016 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Bev\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpaAugust 2016loc.mxd µ 10 10

14 FIGURE 2 CITY OF TAMPA AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY TA/CPA W Palmetto St LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA W Cherry St ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY W Pine St TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA N Glen Ave N Lincoln Ave W Walnut St N Himes Ave N Sterling Ave N Marie Ave N Dale Mabry Hwy W Walnut St W Spruce St W Chestnut St W Union St DATA SOURCES: Aerial Photography 2016, Hillsborough County Geomatics. PARCEL DATA: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. 0 W Main St Feet Author: danielsb Date: 10/7/2016 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Bev\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1611aerial.mxd W Green St Interstate 275 S µ 11 11

15 FIGURE 3 CITY OF TAMPA EXISTING LAND USE W Palmetto St TA/CPA N Himes Ave W Cherry St EXISTING LAND USE LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOME W Pine St TWO FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY MOBILE HOME PARK VACANT PUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONS N Dale Mabry Hwy W Walnut St N Marie Ave N Sterling Ave N Glen Ave W Walnut St PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES RIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYS EDUCATIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL HIGH INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MINING RECREATION / OPEN SPACE W Spruce St AGRICULTURAL NATURAL WATER UNKNOWN NOT CLASSIFIED W Chestnut St W Union St W Chestnut St N Lincoln Ave ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY EXISTING LAND USE: Derived from Property Appraiser parcels and NAL DOR Codes. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. W Main St Feet Author: danielsb Date: 10/7/2016 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Bev\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1611elu.mxd W Green St Interstate 275 S µ 12

16 W Beach St FIGURE 4 CITY OF TAMPA ADOPTED 2040 FUTURE LAND USE W Palmetto St TA/CPA LEGEND CITY OF TAMPA PLAN AMENDMENT AREA RURAL ESTATE - 10 (.25 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 3 (.35 FAR) W Cherry St RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 10 (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.50 FAR) W Pine St RESIDENTIAL - 35 RESIDENTIAL - 50 (.60 FAR) (1.0 FAR) W Spruce St N Marie Ave N Sterling Ave W Walnut St N Himes Ave N Glen Ave W Walnut St N Lincoln Ave RESIDENTIAL - 83 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 16 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 24 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 35 GENERAL MIXED USE -24 URBAN MIXED USE - 60 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (.65 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES,.75 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (.75 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.0 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (1.0 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.5 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (1.5 FAR) (3.25 FAR) (2.0 FAR) (1.5 FAR) (3.5 FAR) (2.0 FAR) (1.5 FAR) (1.5 FAR) RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE W Chestnut St W Chestnut St WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY W Union St TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, Jurisdicitonal areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. N Dale Mabry Hwy W Main St ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission Author: danielsb Date: 10/7/2016 Document Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Bev\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1611flu.mxd Feet W Green St Interstate 275 S µ 13

17 W Beach St W Palmetto St FIGURE 5 CITY OF TAMPA PROPOSED 2040 FUTURE LAND USE TA/CPA FROM: RESIDENTIAL - 10; RESIDENTIAL-20 TO: COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA TAMPA FUTURE LAND USE RURAL ESTATE - 10 (.25 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 3 (.35 FAR) W Cherry St RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 10 (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.50 FAR) W Pine St RESIDENTIAL - 35 RESIDENTIAL - 50 (.60 FAR) (1.0 FAR) W Spruce St N Marie Ave N Sterling Ave W Walnut St N Himes Ave N Glen Ave W Walnut St N Lincoln Ave RESIDENTIAL - 83 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 16 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 24 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 35 GENERAL MIXED USE -24 URBAN MIXED USE - 60 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (.65 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES,.75 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (.75 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.0 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (1.0 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.5 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (1.5 FAR) (3.25 FAR) (2.0 FAR) (1.5 FAR) (3.5 FAR) (2.0 FAR) (1.5 FAR) (1.5 FAR) RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE W Chestnut St W Chestnut St WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY W Union St TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. N Dale Mabry Hwy W Main St ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission Author: danielsb Date: 10/7/2016 Document Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Bev\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1611flu_proposed.mxd Feet W Green St Interstate 275 S µ 14

18 Attachment B Agency Comments 15

19 C STAFF REPORT ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION: CPA HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 14, 2016 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 3425 W. SPRUCE STREET VICINITY - EAST SIDE OF N. HIMES AVENUE, BETWEEN WALNUT & SPRUCE STREETS CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE: R-10 R-20 REQUESTED FUTURE LAND USE: CMU-35 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE The subject property consists of two lots totaling 0.96 ± acres located in the Central Tampa Planning District. This site is located in the general vicinity north of I-275, east of North Dale Mabry Highway, on the northeast side of North Himes Avenue and West Spruce Street. The subject property is adjacent to a vacant residential lot to the east, gas station and a single family dwelling to the south, across West Spruce Street, a water tower to the north, and single family residential to the west across North Himes Avenue. The property is currently zoned Residential Single-family-50 (RS-50), which provides primarily for single family residential uses, requiring a minimum lot width of 50 x 100. The western portion of the site, which fronts North Himes Avenue, is located within the Westshore Overlay Design District. The Westshore District has been designated with future land use categories that support significant redevelopment potential. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The proposed future land use category of Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) would allow for medium intensity/density horizontal and vertical mixed-use and sign-use commercial and residential (by either density or floor area ratio); gathering places such as a plaza, courtyard, or park; and compatible public, quasi-public and special uses. Key city form characteristics include: A development pattern with moderate lot coverage, limited side yard setbacks, and buildings sited up to the corridor to create a consistent street wall; More intense mixed-use development at intersections with stepped down residential uses in between; Building heights that are generally 2 to 5 stories; Building heights that are highest at major intersections and lower when adjacent to neighborhoods unless near a major intersection; Building facades and entrances that directly address the street; Buildings with pedestrian-oriented uses such as outdoor cafes located at the street level; Integrated (vertical and horizontal) residential and non-residential uses along the corridors; Parking that is located to the side or behind buildings, or in parking structures; Limited number of curb cuts along arterial streets, with shared and/or rear alley access to parking and service functions; Attractive streetscape with sidewalks designed to accommodate pedestrian traffic that includes appropriate landscaping, lighting, and pedestrian amenities/facilities; and Public and semi-public outdoor spaces such as plazas, courtyards, and sidewalk cafes. 16

20 C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES LIVABLE CITY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.7: LU Objective 1.2: LU Policy 1.2.3: LU Policy 6.1.3: Continue to consider the development of strategically located mixed-use areas in all districts that accommodate local serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses. Create inspired urban design while respecting Tampa s human scale, unique history, aesthetics, natural environment, and sense of community identity as the City changes and evolves. Relate new buildings and development to the context of the neighborhood and community. Support proposals to convert non-residential properties along mixed-use corridors, between major intersections, to residential or mixed-use residential uses and ensure the development is compatible with surrounding land uses and has adequate access to transit services and community services. LU Policy 6.1.6: Ensure that the introduction of higher-density mixed-use development along major arterial corridors and collector roads is compatible with adjacent land uses, particularly residential uses, by requiring such features as: Buildings setback from rear or side yard property lines adjoining singlefamily residential uses; Building heights stepped back from sensitive adjoining uses (including historic districts) to maintain appropriate transitions in scale, massing and height and to protect privacy and solar access; Landscaped off-street parking areas, loading areas, and service areas screened from adjacent residential areas, to the degree feasible; and Lighting shielded and directed downward to minimize impacts on adjacent residential uses. COMMUNITY PLANS - GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES NE Goal 1: Every neighborhood will be a desirable place to live. NE Policy 1.1.2: NE Objective 1.2: Continue to protect and enhance single family neighborhoods by providing sensitive transitions between these neighborhoods and adjoining areas, and requiring new development, both private and public, to respect and respond to those existing physical characteristics buildings, streetscapes, open spaces, and city form that contribute to the overall character and livability of the neighborhood. Strengthen the positive attributes and distinctive character of each neighborhood to help sustain Tampa as a healthy, vital City. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION This site is located in the Central Tampa Planning District. In the Central Tampa Planning District, development of strategically located mixed-use areas which accommodate local serving commercial, employment, and entertainment uses are encouraged. The requested CMU-35 land use category will allow for these uses. City of Tampa planning staff has reviewed this request and has no objections. Page 2 17

21 REVIEW CRITERIA FOR PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTS City Council must consider the following criteria as set forth in the City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan when deciding the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; both staff s professional opinion and factual information is provided in bold below: 1. The requested land use category meets the intent of the general character description of the City Form component in which it is being requested and is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Per the Comprehensive Plan excerpts provided below, Tampa s specific City Form? (Pages 29 30), the proposed future land use change meets the intent of the City Form for this area within the South Tampa Planning District. As an urban city, Tampa has a defined city form that encompasses many components such as employment centers, urban villages, mixed-use corridors, mixed-use centers, transit stations, and neighborhoods. Elements of City Form: Development Components The physically built environment called the City Form has six (6) major components which are described below. The City Form includes the following: Employment Centers Urban Villages Mixed-use Corridors Mixed-use Centers Transit Stations Neighborhoods o Urban o Traditional o Suburban and Contemporary o The Waterfront Tampa s form is and will continue to be shaped by historical development patterns. The City has developed over the span of 150 years, and is influenced by the building patterns that occurred during three significant periods of time. The potential intensification of such uses allowed in the requested CMU-35 land use category is consistent with the existing development pattern of the surrounding area. 2. In approving any request for a land use category that provides for an increase in density, intensity or for a broader range of uses, than the existing land use category, City Council shall take into consideration and determine if: a. a land use category of similar density or intensity is located on at least one (1) side of the subject site, and The CMU-35 land use category is located to the south, at the northeast corner of North Himes Avenue and West Spruce Street, and to the west, across North Himes Avenue. b. the subject site is within 1320 (1/4 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor, and There is a transit emphasis corridor within a ¼ mile of the 18 Page 3

22 application site to the west: S. Dale Mabry Highway Avenue running north-south through this area. c. the subject parcel is located adjacent to a parcel which has a land use classification of R-6 or R- 10, the subject site is located within 660 (1/8 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor. N/A. 3. In the event that City Council determines that the above criteria are not met, then City Council may deny the amendment or make a determination that the existing land use classification is no longer in the best interests of the public, it may approve the amendment or direct the local planning agency to propose an alternative amendment to the existing land use classification. Based on the historical development pattern of the area and the location of the subject parcels in relation to a core neighborhood of the City, staff believes that the CMU-35 land use category is in the best interest of this neighborhood and the City as a whole. The modification would allow for the continuation mixed use development into this area. 4. If a land use is changed based on this criteria, the property owner shall process through a site plan district and, if provided for in the City s land development regulations, shall meet the Development Performance Incentive Criteria, unless the development is within an approved Community Planning Area/Adopted Form Based Code Area, in which case a site plan zoning may not be required, as provided for in the specific plan in the land development regulations. Acknowledged. 19 Page 4

23 LaChone Dock From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Calvin Thornton Thursday, October 06, :45 PM LaChone Dock Melanie Calloway; Jonathan Scott; Vik Bhide; Milton Martinez RE: TA CPA 16-07, 16-09, 16-10, Agency Comment Request - COMMENTS DUE Calvin Thornton.vcf Hello LaChone Transportation Design section has no objection to plan amendment TA CPA 16 07, and However with plan amendment TA CPA 16 11, transportation would like to request a 10 feet by 10 feet corner clip for the traffic signal on the northeast corner of Himes Avenue and Spruce Street. Thanks Calvin Thornton From: LaChone Dock Sent: Wednesday, September 28, :07 AM To: Calvin Thornton Subject: FW: TA CPA 16-07, 16-09, 16-10, Agency Comment Request - COMMENTS DUE Good morning Calvin, Sorry I missed your call, I ve been out a couple days. For CPA the planning commission staff attached the incorrect maps for this location. In the body of my I mentioned the correct maps have been attached. I apologize, I probably should have highlighted it in the summary. So you should have the necessary maps, if not let me know. Also note for CPA the folio numbers are incorrect on the report. I have provided the correct folio numbers and addresses for this application. Thanks, LaChone 1 20

24 21

25 22

26 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request TA/CPA Transportation Information Road Name Himes Ave. Himes Ave. Spruce St. From - To I-275 to Spruce St. Spruce St. to Columbus Dr. Himes Ave. to MacDill Ave. Number of Lanes Adopted LOS Standard Current LOS Pedestrian LOS Bicycle LOS 4LD D C C D 4LD D C C D 2L NA NA NA NA Transportation Analysis Existing The site is on the corner of West Spruce Street and North Himes Avenue There is no sidewalk or bicycle facilities on Spruce St. directly in front of the site. There is a sidewalk but no bicycle facility on Himes Ave in front of the site. HART provides bus service in this area. Transportation Analysis Future Proposed There are no capacity improvements in this area in the current 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. There are no capacity improvements in this area in the current 5 year Transportation Improvement Program. The HART Transit Development Plan identifies the need for expansion of transit service in this area. Special Area Analysis This area is identified in the MPO s Demographic Analysis for Environmental Justice Purposes as an area having a high density of minority populations. Residents in these areas tend to be more reliant on cycling, walking, and transit (when available) for their travel purposes whether to work, school, shopping, and appointments. *This is a cursory transportation assessment. Once a site plan has been revealed, a more detailed Transportation Impact Assessment should be performed. 23

27 MEMORANDUM To: Tony LaColla, AICP From: Amber K. Dickerson Wheeler, AICP Department Manager, Planning & Siting Date: September 23, 2016 Re: City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment TPA/CPA and 3435 West Spruce Street ( , ) Amendment TPA/CPA would convert a 0.96 acre parcel from Residential-10 (R-10) and Residential-20 (R-20) to Community Commercial (CC-35). Up to twenty-five (25) dwelling units could potentially be developed on the site. Based on adopted Student Generation Rates the amendment could potentially generate four (4) students in the kindergarten through 5 th grade level, two (2) students at the 6 th through 8 th grade level, and two (2) students at the high school level. Per the Department of Education s Capital Outlay Full Time Equivalent (COFTE) projections, all of the impacted schools are projected to have capacity in the next 5 years. The amendment area will be served by West Tampa Elementary School, Madison Middle School, and Jefferson High School. The capacity and projected enrollments at the three schools are as follows: FISH Capacity Reserved for concurrency Students generated by amendment Enrollment Available Capacity Projected Enrollment Available Capacity School West Tampa Elementary Madison Middle Jefferson High This is a capacity review, and is not a concurrency determination. A concurrency review will take place prior the preliminary plat or site plan approval. 24

28 Attachment C Site Photos Subject site, facing north on West Spruce Street. 25

29 Subject site, facing north. North Himes Avenue is directly to the west; the West Tampa water tower is visible in the distance. 26

30 Surrounding area. Gas station located at the southwest corner of West Spruce Street and North Himes Avenue (across the street from the subject site). 27

31 Surrounding area, intersection of West Spruce Street and North Himes Avenue, facing south. 28

32 Surrounding area, facing east on West Spruce Street, new construction homes

33 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 30

34 Attachment D Basis of Review Adopting and Amending Plan The Tampa City Council shall have the power to adopt and amend the Tampa Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the provisions of Chapter , Laws of Florida, as amended; Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; and the provisions of this section. The Local Planning Agency may submit to the Tampa City Council proposals for amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. Citizens owning or having a substantial interest in property may submit to the Local Planning Agency proposals for amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. The Tampa City Council shall review any such proposal for the purpose of assessing its appropriateness in light of the Goal, Objectives, and Policies of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, and after receiving recommendations from The Planning Commission and Tampa City Administration, shall provide final interpretation of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan and take action. All citizens, whether they are directly or indirectly affected shall be given an opportunity to contribute to the planning and policy-making process through public meetings and hearings. However, all questions of standing shall be reviewed pursuant to relevant law. Amendment to the Adopted Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment of any aspect of the comprehensive plan represents a major policy decision by the Tampa City Council. An amendment of the Future Land Use Map, in particular, is a declaration that growth and development pattern initially sought by the City in a particular location, through thoughtful adoption of the comprehensive plan, is no longer appropriate. A significant change in circumstances affecting the suitability of property in a particular area for the kind of development intended by the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, which was not contemplated at the time the comprehensive plan was adopted, may justify a reconsideration of the land use category into which that area has been placed on the map. Future Land Use Map changes not functionally related to the overall purposes expressed in the Map and policies contained herein could seriously undermine the integrity of the Map and other provisions of the comprehensive plan itself. Amendments therefore should not occur with the same frequency as parcel rezoning amendments; and their effect upon the entire Comprehensive Plan, including the practical consequences of the policy shift signified by the amendment shall be considered. It is a stated public purpose that growth and change in neighborhoods must be managed so that the quality of life in this part of the city form is maintained or enhanced. The plan amendment process is one tool that will be used to achieve this. Assessing a Proposed Amendment In assessing the merits of a Plan amendment, the Local Planning Agency and the Tampa City Council shall consider the policy implications the amendment would have on the Future Land Use Map in the general area of the affected property and the development pattern and growth policies currently being pursued there. In order that the Tampa City Council may be able to fully assess the consequences of approving the proposed change, the Local Planning Agency s report to the City Council shall include: 31

35 An assessment of the consistency of the proposed change with other portions and features of the Plan, and Recommendations for whatever further amendment would be advisable in conjunction with the proper amendment, and An analysis of infrastructure requirements for service necessitated and the benefits generated by the proposed amendment, and/or A finding, if applicable, based on information currently available, that an error or mistake had been made in the original land use designation shown on the Future Land Use Map. If a development proposal is not supported by the Goals, Objectives, and Policies within the Plan, serious consideration should be given to making modifications to the proposal, or the following criteria should be used to determine if a Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be justified. the character of the adjacent neighborhood; the zoning and uses of nearby properties; the suitability of the property for the uses allowed under the current zoning designation; the type and extent of positive or detrimental impact that may affect adjacent properties, or the community at large, if the request is approved; the impact of the proposal on public utilities and facilities; the length of time that the subject and adjacent properties have been utilized for their current uses; the benefits of the proposal to the public health, safety, and welfare compared to the effect on the applicant if the request is not approved; comparison between the existing Future Land Use Plan Map and the proposed change regarding the relative conformance to the goal and policies; and consideration of professional staff recommendations. In the case of more comprehensive proposals (such as a capital improvements program, or a subarea plan/study), a more extensive evaluation may be required to identify potential revisions to the proposal or to the Plan. The report should include an evaluation which includes the following: description of the proposal; identification of Sections of the Comprehensive Plan that would be affected by the proposal; evaluation of the effects of the proposal on the Comprehensive Plan, by Section. If the proposal supports the Plan, the evaluation should also indicate; but if it conflicts with the Plan, the nature and extent of the conflict should be identified; and identification of adjustments to the Plan or the proposals that would reduce any noted conflicts or negative impacts. If adjustments to the Plan are proposed, they should be undertaken and adopted per the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process before final action is taken on the comprehensive proposal. 32

36 Review Criteria for Plan Amendment Requests In considering a plan amendment, City Council shall review the following criteria: The requested land use category meets the intent of the general character description of the City Form component in which it is being requested and is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In approving any request for a land use category that provides for an increase in density, intensity or for a broader range of uses, than the existing land use category, City Council shall take into consideration and determine if:: a land use category of similar density or intensity is located on at least one (1) side of the subject site, and the subject site is within 1320 (1/4 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor, and the subject parcel is located adjacent to a parcel which has a land use classification of R-6 or R-10, the subject site is located within 660 (1/8 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor. In the event that City Council determines that the above criteria are not met, then City Council may have cause to deny the amendment. If City Council makes a determination that the existing land use classification is no longer in the best interests of the public, it may approve the amendment or direct the local planning agency to propose an alternative amendment to the existing land use classification. If a land use is changed based on this criteria, the property owner shall process through a site plan district and, if provided for in the City s land development regulations, shall meet the Development Performance Incentive Criteria, unless the development is within an approved Community Planning Area/Adopted Form Based Code Area, in which case a site plan zoning may not be required, as provided for in the specific plan in the land development regulations. 33