National Fire Protection Association. 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax:

Transcription

1 National Fire Protection Association 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA Phone: Fax: M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: NFPA Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage and Miscellaneous Occupancies Kristin Collette, Staff Liaison DATE: October 26, 2010 SUBJECT: NFPA 5000 ROC TC Letter Ballot (A 2011 Cycle) The ROC letter ballot for NFPA 5000 is attached. The ballot is for formally voting on whether or not you concur with the committee s actions on the comments. Reasons must accompany all negative and abstention ballots. Please do not vote negatively because of editorial errors. However, please bring such errors to my attention for action. Please complete and return your ballot as soon as possible but no later than Friday, November 12, As noted on the ballot form, please return the ballot to Diane Matthews either via to dmatthews@nfpa.org or via fax to You may also mail your ballot to the attention of Diane Matthews at NFPA, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA The return of ballots is required by the Regulations Governing Committee Projects. Attachments: Comments

2 Log #33 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, Review the definitions from NFPA 88A, 2011 edition (proposed) and make any additional changes that may be necessary. In addition, the committee is asked to revise the content of 3.XX.1,. The reference to Section 5.5 of NFPA 88A should be revised as follows: Extract text of NFPA 88A, Section 5.5 to Chapter 30 of NFPA 5000 (such as 30.8.XX) and then revise the definition to refer to this paragraph. The public proposal refers to the 2010 edition, the committee statement refers to the 2012 edition but the current schedule shows there will be a 2011 edition of NFPA 88A. The definition should be revised to refer to the necessary text in NFPA 5000 as opposed to referring back to NFPA 88A. This can be accomplished by extracting the additional text as suggested. 1. Revise definitions to read as follows: 3.3.XX* Parking Structure. A building, structure, or portion thereof used for the parking, storage, or both, of motor vehicles.[88a, 3.3.2] A.3.3.xx A parking structure is permitted to be enclosed or open, use ramps, and use mechanical control push-button-type elevators to transfer vehicles from one floor to another. Motor vehicles are permitted to be parked by the driver or an attendant or are permitted to be parked mechanically by automated facilities. Where automated-type parking is provided, the operator of those facilities is permitted either to remain at the entry level or to travel to another level. Motor fuel is permitted to be dispensed, and motor vehicles are permitted to be serviced in a parking structure in accordance with NFPA 30A. [80A, A.3.3.2] 3.3.XX.1 Parking Structure, Open. A parking structure that meets the requirements of 5.5 of NFPA 88A [88A, 3.3.x] 3.3.XX.2 Parking Structure, Enclosed. Any parking structure that is not an open parking structure.[88a, ] 3.3.XX.3 Parking Structure, Ramp Type. A parking structure that utilizes sloped floors for vertical vehicle circulation. [88A, ] 3.3.XX.4 Parking Structure, Assisted Mechanical Type. A parking structure that uses lifts or other mechanical devices to transport vehicles to the floors of a parking structure, where the vehicles are then parked by a person.[88a, ] 3.3.XX.5 Parking Structure, Automated Type. A parking structure that uses computer controlled machines to store and retrieve vehicles, without drivers, in multi-level storage racks with no floors. [88A, ] Special Definition Open Parking Structure. A parking structure that, at each parking level, has wall openings open to the atmosphere, for an area of not less than 1.4 ft2 (0.13 m2) for each linear foot (0.3 m) of its exterior perimeter. Such openings are distributed over 40 percent of the building perimeter or uniformly over two opposing sides. Interior wall lines and column lines are at least 20 percent open, with openings distributed to provide ventilation. [88A,2007] Open Parking Structures shall comply with through Each parking level shall have wall openings open to the atmosphere, for an area of not less than 0.4 m2 for each linear meter (1.4 ft2 for each linear foot) of its exterior perimeter. [88A, 5.5.1] Such openings shall be distributed over 40 percent of the building perimeter or uniformly over two opposing sides. [88A, 5.5.2] Interior wall lines and column lines shall be at least 20 percent open, with openings distributed to provide ventilation. [88A, 5.5.3] The revised text responds to the request of the Technical Correlating Committee. The text was revised so that the definition of Open Parking Structure references the appropriate section of Chapter 30, not NFPA 88A. The annex note accompanying the definition of Parking Structure was added and extracted from NFPA 88A. This was unintentionally omitted from the definitions during the ROP. 1

3 Log #37 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, Reconsider the committee action on the Proposal with regard to a series of requirements being shown in this definition. In addition, the committee is asked to consider deleting this definition from Chapter 3. The NFPA Manual of Style precludes requirements from being integrated into definitions. The addition of an area threshold (750 sq ft) establishes a requirement that is better handled as a standalone provision elsewhere in the code such as in Chapter 30. The three conditions noted in the unchanged portions of the definition are also requirements and should be relocated to other areas of the code outside of Chapter 3. This term is only used in Chapter 30 ( ) and the various criteria might best be consolidated in Chapter * Mini-Storage Building. A storage occupancy partitioned into individual storage units, with no unit greater than 750 square feet in area, that are rented or leased for the purposes of storing personal or business items where a majority of the individual storage units are not greater than 750 sq ft. where all of the following apply: (1) the storage units are separated from each other by less than a 1-hr fire resistance rated barrier; (2) the owner of the facility does not have unrestricted access to the storage units; and (3) the items being stored are concealed from view from outside the storage unit An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout all mini-storage buildings greater than 2500 ft2 (232 m2) and where any of the individual storage units are separated by less than a one hour fire resistance rated barrier. The revised language removes requirements from the definition of 'mini-storage building'. The 750 sq ft threshold is retained as part of the definition because it is a necessary descriptor of a mini storage building, not a requirement for one. This is similar in format to the 75 ft threshold for high rise buildings. The revised language of section clarify the requirements for sprinklered mini-storage buildings by incorporating the requirements formally located in the definition. The changes address the recommendations from the Technical Correlating Committee. 2

4 Log #115 BLD-IND Rick Thornberry, The Code Consortium, Inc Revise the current text in Mini-Storage Building as proposed in the original Proposal as follows: A storage occupancy partitioned into individual storage units, with a majority of the individual units not greater than 750 square feet in area, that are rented or leased for the purposes of storing personal or business items where all of the following apply: (1) the storage units are separated from each other by less than a 1-hr fire resistance rated barrier; (2) the owner of the facility does not have unrestricted access to the storage units; and (3) the items being stored are concealed from view from outside the storage unit. The revised wording proposed in this Public Comment will make Section Mini-Storage Building identical to that in Proposal 1-49 to NFPA 1 Fire Code Section Mini-Storage Building submitted on behalf of the American Pyrotechnics Association (APA). That proposal was accepted by the NFPA 1 Fire Code Technical Committee during their Report on Proposals (ROP) meeting. The problem with the revision made by the Industrial, Storage and Miscellaneous Occupancies Technical Committee is that it creates a loophole in the definition of Mini-Storage Building. This loophole would allow what would otherwise be considered a mini-storage building to be constructed to an area greater than 2,500 sf without having to provide an automatic sprinkler system as would otherwise be required by Section Mini-Storage Building of NFPA 5000 because one of the individual storage units within the building exceeded 750 sf in area. The original revisions to the definition for Mini-Storage Building proposed in Proposal (as well as Proposal 1-49) would not allow that situation to occur where some of the individual storage units exceeded the 750 sf area per individual storage unit. This is because of the phrase being added that refers to a majority of the individual units not being greater than 750 sf in area. Thus, a mini-storage building could have individual storage units greater than the 750 sf limitation but still be classified as a mini-storage building where most of the individual storage units are less than 750 sf in area so that when the building exceeds the 2,500 sf in area, it would be required to have an automatic sprinkler system. The original intent of the revisions to the definition for Mini-Storage Building was to provide for a practical upper limit on the square footage area of individual storage units that would encompass the vast majority of mini-storage buildings constructed throughout the country so that larger type speculative warehouse buildings constructed for multi-tenants would not be captured by this definition. In conclusion, we believe that the revisions to the definition contained in Proposal , as well as Proposal 1-49, correctly implement the intent of the definition for Mini-Storage Building. Also, by accepting this Public Comment, a potential conflict between NFPA 5000 and NFPA 1 regarding the definition of Mini-Storage Building will be avoided. The committee addressed this recommendation in Comment (Log #37). See committee action on Comment (Log #37). 3

5 Log #139 BLD-IND Glossary of Terms Technical Advisory Committee, a Extract the same definition of Handling from NFPA 1, Fire Code Handling. The deliberate movement of material by any means to a point of storage or use. [400, , 2009] NFPA 1 has the same definition as NFPA 400. This creates consistency within the NFPA Glossary of Terms project. Revise definition to read as follows: Handling. The deliberate movement of material by any means to a point of storage or use. [400, , ] NFPA 5000 extracts specific sections of the applicable Code or Standard. The extract reference should state the section reference of NFPA 1 for the definition, not the edition date. The extract should be updated when newer editions of NFPA 1 are referenced aa Log #CC553 BLD-IND a Health Hazard Material. A chemical or substance classified as a toxic, highly toxic, or corrosive material in accordance with definitions set forth in this Code. [400, ] ab Log #CC554 BLD-IND b Physical Hazard Material. A chemical or substance classified as a combustible liquid, explosive, flammable cryogen, flammable gas, flammable liquid, flammable solid, organic peroxide, oxidizer, oxidizing cryogen, pyrophoric, unstable reactive), or water-reactive material. [400, ] 4

6 ac Log #CC551 BLD-IND a * Hazardous Material. A chemical or substance that is classified as a physical hazard material or a health hazard material, whether the chemical or substance is in usable or waste condition. (See also Health Hazard Material, and , Physical Hazard Material.) [400, ] A Hazardous Material. Hazardous wastes might or might not be classified as hazardous materials. Management and disposal of hazardous waste is regulated by the EPA under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA requires wastes identified as hazardous to be handled, stored, treated, and disposed of according to the stipulations of the RCRA hazardous waste program in 40 CFR 260 to 265 and 40 CFR 266 to 299. [400, A ] ad Log #CC552 BLD-IND b * Incompatible Material. Materials that, when in contact with each other, have the potential to react in a manner that generates heat, fumes, gases, or by-products that are hazardous to life or property. [400, ] A Incompatible Material. Information on incompatible materials can be found in material safety data sheets (MSDS) or manufacturers product bulletins. [400, A ] a Log #CC555 BLD-IND b Pyrophoric Material. A chemical with an autoignition temperature in air at or below 130 F (54.4 C). [400, ] 5

7 b Log #CC556 BLD-IND a * Highly Toxic Material. A material that produces a lethal dose or lethal concentration that falls within any of the following categories: (1) a chemical that has a median lethal dose (LD50) of 50 mg/kg or less of body weight when administered orally to albino rats weighing between 200 g and 300 g each; (2) a chemical that has a median lethal dose (LD50) of 200 mg/kg or less of body weight when administered by continuous contact for 24 hours, or less if death occurs within 24 hours, with the bare skin of albino rabbits weighing between 2 kg and 3 kg each or albino rats weighing 00 g to 300 g each; (3) a chemical that has a median lethal concentration (LC50) in air of 200 parts per million by volume or less of gas or vapor, or 2 mg/lor less of mist, fume, or dust, when administered by continuous inhalation for 1 hour, or less if death occurs within 1 hour, to albino rats weighing between 200 g and 300 g each. [400, ] The 2012 edition of NFPA 5000 will reference the 2010 edition of NFPA 400. The 2010 edition of NFPA 400 currently extracts this definition from NFPA If NFPA 5000 extracts from NFPA 400 for this edition the extract references will be circuitous. For this edition, NFPA 5000 will not extract from NFPA 400 but will add the extracts back Per the ballot comment, the definition is renumbered to make it a subset of Material not Toxic Material c Log #CC558 BLD-IND c * Toxic Material. A material that produces a lethal dose or a lethal concentration within any of the following categories: (1) a chemical or substance that has a median lethal dose (LD50) of more than 50 mg/kg but not more than 500 mg/kg of body weight when administered orally to albino rats weighing between 200 g and 300 g each; (2) a chemical or substance that has a median lethal dose (LD50) of more than 200 mg/kg but not more than 1000 mg/kg of body weight when administered by continuous contact for 24 hours, or less if death occurs within 24 hours, with the bare skin of albino rabbits weighing between 2 kg and 3 kg each, or albino rats weighing 200 g to 300 g each; (3) a chemical or substance that has a median lethal concentration (LC50) in air of more than 200 parts per million but not more than 2000 parts per million by volume of gas or vapor, or more than 2 mg/l but not more than 20 mg/l, of mist, fume, or dust when administered by continuous inhalation for 1 hour, or less if death occurs within 1 hour, to albino rats weighing between 200 g and 300 g each. [400, ] A Toxic Material. While categorization is basically simple in application, the degree of hazard depends on many variables that should be carefully considered individually and in combination. Some examples include the following: (1) Materials wherein the toxic component or mixtures thereof are inextricably bound and cannot be released so there is little or no potential for exposure (2) Nonfriable solid hazardous materials existing in product forms and in the demonstrated absence of inhalable particles that might not present the same inhalation hazard as the chemical components existing in a friable state (3) Mixtures of toxic materials with ordinary materials, such as water, that might not warrant classification as toxic. Any hazard evaluation that is required for the precise categorization of toxic material is required to be performed by experienced, technically competent persons. [400, A ] 6

8 d Log #CC557 BLD-IND b * Unstable (Reactive) Material. A material that, in the pure state or as commercially produced, will vigorously polymerize, decompose or condense, become selfreactive, or otherwise undergo violent chemical change under conditions of shock, pressure, or temperature. [400, ] A Unstable (Reactive) Material. Unstable (reactive) material is classified as follows: (1) Class 4 unstable (reactive) materials are those that, in themselves, are readily capable of detonation, explosive decomposition, or explosive reaction at normal temperatures and pressures and include, among others, materials that are sensitive to localized thermal or mechanical shock at normal temperatures and pressures. (2) Class 3 unstable (reactive) materials are those that, in themselves, are capable of detonation, explosive decomposition, or explosive reaction, but that require a strong initiating source or that must be heated under confinement before initiation, and include, among others, materials that are sensitive to thermal or mechanical shock at elevated temperatures and pressures. (3) Class 2 unstable (reactive) materials are those that readily undergo violent chemical change at elevated temperatures and pressures and include, among others, materials that exhibit an exotherm at emperatures less than or equal to 30 F (-1 C) when tested by differential scanning calorimetry. (4) Class 1 unstable (reactive) materials are those that, in themselves, are normally stable, but that can become unstable at elevated temperatures and pressures and include among others, materials that change or decompose on exposure to air, light, or moisture and that exhibit an exotherm at temperatures greater than 30 F (-1 C), but less than or equal to 57 F (14 C), when tested by differential scanning calorimetry. [400, A ] e Log #CC559 BLD-IND c * Water-Reactive Material. A material that explodes; violently reacts; produces flammable, toxic, or other hazardous gases; or evolves enough heat to cause self-ignition or ignition of nearby combustibles upon exposure to water or moisture. [400, ] 7

9 Log #5 BLD-IND Patrick A. McLaughlin, McLaughlin & Associates / Rep. PPG Industries, Inc. and Arch Chemicals, Inc a Revise text as follows: Any solid or liquid material, other than a blasting agent or explosive, that readily yields oxygen or other oxidizing gas, or that readily reacts to promote or initiate combustion of combustible materials and under some circumstances can undergo a vigorous self-sustained decomposition due to contamination or heat exposure. [400, ] The definition that was approved, according to the substantiation, was to be extracted from NFPA 400, however, what was printed was incomplete. This comment extracts all the NFPA 400 text in the oxidizer definition. 1. Accept revised definition. 2. Delete current annex language and add extracted annex language from NFPA 400 as follows: A Oxidizer. Oxidizer liquids and solids are subdivided as follows: (1) A Class 4 oxidizer is an oxidizer that can undergo an explosive reaction due to contamination or exposure to thermal or physical shock, enhances the burning rate, and might cause spontaneous ignition of combustible materials. (2) A Class 3 oxidizer is an oxidizer that causes a severe increase in the burning rate of combustible materials with which it comes in contact or that undergoes vigorous, self-sustained decomposition due to contamination or exposure to heat. (3) A Class 2 oxidizer is an oxidizer that causes a moderate increase in the burning rate or that might cause spontaneous ignition of combustible materials with which it comes into contact. (4) A Class 1 oxidizer is an oxidizer whose primary hazard is that it slightly increases the burning rate but does not cause spontaneous ignition when it comes into contact with combustible materials. A Oxidizer. Examples of other oxidizing gases include bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. The classification of oxidizers is based on the technical committee s evaluation of available scientific and technical data, actual experience, and its considered opinion. Classification refers to the pure oxidizer. Gross contamination can cause oxidizers of all classes to undergo exothermic or explosive reaction, particularly if they also are subjected to confinement and heating. (See G.1.2 through G.1.4 for oxidizer classifications.) The classification of oxidizers is based on the degree to which an oxidizing chemical increases, if at all, the burning rate of available combustible fuels. Factors that can influence the burning rate of oxidizers are concentration, particle size, product form, product packaging, and packaging configuration. Examples of Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 chemical oxidizers are listed in Annex G.1. The definition of the current classes and the oxidizers listed as typical of each Class in Annex G.1 are based on the technical committee s evaluation of available data, experience and results of tests done by the Bureau of Mines and GE Research in the 1970s. The definition of Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 oxidizers is subjective. Currently, there is no bench scale test method that adequately measures the burning rate of oxidizers for large scale storage. The UN s Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods includes a bench scale test method (Test O.1) to assign packing groups to solid oxidizers. Thirty grams (1.06 oz) of a mixture of the test substance and cellulose powder is ignited with a Nichrome wire. The time from ignition to the end of visible burning of the mixture is compared with the burning time of several different mixtures of potassium bromate (Class 3) and cellulose powder. The test does not characterize chemical reactivity or thermal stability. The test is not representative of packaged oxidizers. The determination of burning time is strongly dependent on test conditions, particle size and the test operator s perception of the end of active burning. The Fire Protection Research Foundation (FPRF) published National Oxidizing Pool Chemicals Storage Fire Test Project in August The technical report includes literature abstracts, large-scale calorimetry test data and intermediate scale rack storage tests. The peak rate of heat release of packaging and packaged oxidizers trichloroisocyanuric acid (Trichlor, Class 1) and calcium hypochlorite (available chlorine >68%, Class 3) are summarized in Table A The Class 1 Trichlor did not increase the burning rate of the combustible packaging. Class 3 calcium hypochlorite (available chlorine >68%) caused a severe increase in the burning rate of the combustible packaging. In 2006, the FPRF published a report on the Development of an Enhanced Hazard Classification System for Oxidizers. The report includes a review of fire losses, historical test data, and current test methods for oxidizing materials used by 8

10 transportation and environmental regulatory agencies. Two classification schemes with multiple test methods and performance-based criteria were proposed to distinguish between Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 oxidizers in a storage situation. Future FPRF effort is proposed to define an appropriate bench scale test, validated by medium scale free burn testing, for oxidizers. The goal of the enhanced classification system would be to prescribe tests and use performance based criteria to define the different classes of oxidizers based on the degree of burning rate enhancement, chemical reactivity and thermal stability. ****Insert Table A **** The revised definition of 'oxidizer' extracts the term from NFPA 400. The annex language from the definition in NFPA 400 should also be extracted to coordinate with the definition Log #53 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, Review the action taken by BLD-BLC on proposal Proposal considers removal of the story height limits and area criteria from Chapter 7. No correlative action was considered as to how the allowable construction types for the occupancy chapters would be handled (in the Section) without such content. The Mercantile and Business committee reviewed the actions of the Building Construction committee. No further action is needed at this time. It is the committee's understanding that, during their ROC meeting, the Building Construction committee has voted to retain the height and area table in NFPA Chapters 29 through 31, 33 and 34 do not contain construction requirements that would be affected by the actions of the Building Construction committee Log #67 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, a Reconsider the action on this proposal to determine if latching is required or not. Section (3) appears to not require the latching hardware but implies that the occupancy chapters can offer a different option. The Occupancy Chapter TCs should review their chapter provisions applicable to smoke barriers and, if it is the TC s desire, revise text so as to specifically require latching in the appropriate locations. The occupancy chapters might need to be correlated with the change made to (3). The committee has reviewed proposal a and the provisions of the this committee's designated occupancy chapters. No provisions, specific to smoke barriers are located in Chapters 29 through 31, 33, or 34. In response to proposal a, no additional language is required at this time. 9

11 Table A Results of Large-Scale Calorimetry Tests with Packaging and Packaged Oxidizers on Wood Pallets Oxidizer and Packaging Total Weight with Pallets Peak Convective HRR (kw) (lb) 40 cartons of empty HDPE 2 lb capacity containers cartons of pea gravel filled HDPE 2 lb capacity containers 40 cartons of granular Trichlor in HDPE 2 lb capacity containers 40 cartons of tablet form Trichlor in HDPE 2 lb capacity containers 48 cartons of granular calcium hypochlorite in 1 lb capacity Surlin (plastic) bags 36 cartons of granular calcium hypochlorite in HDPE 1452 > lb capacity containers For SI units, 1 lb = 0.45 kg. Source: FPRF, National Oxidizing Pool Chemicals Storage Fire Test Project, Aug NFPA 5000 Log #5 CA A2011 ROC

12 Log #143 BLD-IND High Rise Building Safety Advisory Committee, c Accept proposed new Section but do not accept new This public comment was prepared by the NFPA High-Rise Building Safety Advisory Committee (HRB-SAC). The HRB-SAC members are: HRB-SAC is an advisory committee established by the NFPA Standards Council to advise the association, and especially the association s technical committees, on all safety issues related to high-rise buildings. This public comment is in reaction to the action taken in the ROP. The permission to exempt all special purpose industrial occupancies from the high rise building requirements in Chapter 33 is too broad. There are select high rise special purpose industrial occupancies that, if exempt from this package of provisions, would become hazardous for fire fighter operation and response as well as potentially reducing occupant life safety. In addition, adequate technical justification has not been provided as to why these special purpose industrial occupancies should be treated differently than the other types of industrial occupancies that may often have similar characteristics, or how the life safety of special purpose industrial occupancies would not be adversely affected should the requirements of Chapter 33 not apply. Following the meeting at which HRB-SAC prepared this public comment, it was letter balloted by HRB-SAC. The ballot results follow: HRBSAC Ballot Results for This Comment Agree - 8 Agree with Comment - 0 Disagree - 0 Abstain - 0 Not Returned -2 (Nilles, Pratt) Total 10 10

13 Log #144 BLD-IND High Rise Building Safety Advisory Committee, e Accept proposed new but reject proposed new This public comment was prepared by the NFPA High-Rise Building Safety Advisory Committee (HRB-SAC). The HRB-SAC members are: HRB-SAC is an advisory committee established by the NFPA Standards Council to advise the association, and especially the association s technical committees, on all safety issues related to high-rise buildings. This public comment is in reaction to the action taken in the ROP. The permission to exempt all low hazard storage occupancies from the high rise building requirements in Chapter 33 is too broad. There are select high rise, low hazard, storage occupancies that, if exempt from this package of provisions, would become hazardous for fire fighter operation and response as well as potentially reducing occupant life safety. In addition, adequate technical justification has not been provided as to why these occupancies should be treated differently than the other types of storage occupancies that may often have similar characteristics, or how the life safety of low hazard storage occupancies would not be adversely affected should the requirements of Chapter 33 not apply. Following the meeting at which HRB-SAC prepared this public comment, it was letter balloted by HRB-SAC. The ballot results follow: HRBSAC Ballot Results for This Comment Agree - 8 Agree with Comment - 0 Disagree - 0 Abstain - 0 Not Returned -2 (Nilles, Pratt) Total b Log #CC560 BLD-IND a Unless otherwise permitted by Chapters 15 through 31 and 33 through 34, the standby power system shall be connected to the following:... As an occupancy based Code, the occupancy chapters should have the option to respond to a requirement located in a core chapter. See committee action on ROP c and e for new language that requires the addition of correlative text to be located in Chapter 33. Correlating language was also proposed and accepted for addition to NFPA 101 Chapter

14 Log #81 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, b The committee is asked to review the recommendation in this proposal to determine if the language is consistent with NFPA 400 as pointed out in the negative ballot. The provisions of Chapter 34 concerning flammable and combustible liquids should not be in conflict with NFPA Hazardous Materials Code. Buildings, and portions thereof, where hazardous materials within the scope of NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code are stored, used, or handled shall also comply with the applicable requirements of NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code. The revised text is consistent with NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code. The committee incorporated the details addressed in the negative ballot as requested by the Technical Correlating Committee Log #82 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, The committee is asked to review the recommendation in this proposal to determine if the reference to NFPA 36 in NFPA 5000: is consistent with how the document would apply to Chapter 34. The general reference to NFPA 36 in Chapter 6 of NFPA 5000 would appear to address the equipment and design concerns expressed in the proposal. The committee has reviewed proposal and no further action is needed at this time. The committee's position from the ROP stands. Section and direct the user to the use of the additional standards for code application purposes. There is no conflict in the current code language Log #83 BLD-IND Technical Correlating Committee on Building Code, The committee is asked to review the recommendation in this proposal to make any additional corrections that are necessary as pointed out in the Comment on Affirmative ballots. A footnote reference was not shown. The committee has reviewed the ballot comments. No action is needed. All corrections were made during the ROP. The correct table appears in the published ROP. 12

15 Log #4 BLD-IND Patrick A. McLaughlin, McLaughlin & Associates / Rep. PPG Industries, Inc. and Arch Chemicals, Inc Revise text as follows: Add footnote "j" to the "Oxidizer" row in the "CLASS" column, to 3 to read: Oxidizer 4 3 j 2 1 The comments corrects an error in the Table. When it was transcribed, superscript "j", permitting 200 lbs of Class 3 oxidizers under certain conditions, was inadvertently left off Class 3 oxidizer, however, the text of "j" does appear with the table a Log #CC550 BLD-IND Delete section Maximum Allowable Quantity (MAQ) of Flammable and Combustible Liquids in Industrial Occupancies. The MAQ of flammable and combustible liquids in storage and closed use combined in industrial occupancies shall be as follows: (1) 25 gal (95 L) of Class IA liquids in containers [30: (1)] (2) 120 gal (454 L) of Class IB, Class IC, Class II, or Class III liquids in containers [30: (2)] (3) 1586 gal (6000 L) of any combination of the following: [30: (3)] (a) Class IB, Class IC, Class II, or Class IIIA liquids in metal portable tanks or metal intermediate bulk containers, each not exceeding 793 gal (3000 L) (b) Class II or Class IIIA liquids in nonmetallic intermediate bulk containers, each not exceeding 793 gal (3000 L) (4) 20 portable tanks or intermediate bulk containers each not exceeding 793 gal (3000 L) of Class IIIB liquids [30: (4)] In the 2009 edition of NFPA 5000, the current text of section is extracted from the 2000 edition of NFPA 30, which is an outdated referenced document. This section was never updated to reflect the edition of NFPA 30 referenced by Chapter 2. Since the 2000 edition of NFPA 30, the document has been reogranized to reference NFPA 5000's MAQ values for the use formally required by There is no longer a need for this section and it should be deleted. 13